NUTRITION-SENSITIVE FOOD SYSTEMS...

NUTRITION-SENSITIVE FOOD SYSTEMS(2016-2020)

Official

Typewritten Text

Official

Typewritten Text

Official

Typewritten Text

NUTRITION-SENSITIVE FOOD SYSTEMS(2016-2020)

This document is the result of a joint effort by the following ministries:

Ministry of AgricultureMinistry of Fisheries and LivestockMinistry of Food Ministry of Water ResourcesMinistry of IndustriesMinistry of Social WelfareMinistry of Disaster Management and ReliefMinistry of Women and Children AffairsMinistry of Chittagong Hill Tracts AffairsMinistry of Environment, Forest and Climate ChangeLocal Government Division, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and CooperativesRural Development and Cooperatives Division, Ministry of LGRDC Health Services Division, Ministry of Health and Family WelfareStatistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of PlanningGeneral Economics Division, Bangladesh Planning CommissionImplementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division, Ministry of Planning Economic Relations Division, Ministry of FinanceFinance Division, Ministry of Finance

This document was developed in close consultation with private sector representatives, civil society organisations, farmer groups and organisations, representatives from research and academia, and resource partners.

Coordinated by the Food Planning and Monitoring Unit (FPMU), Ministry of Food

ISBN 978-984-34-4961-0

________________________________________________________________________________Published by the FPMU, Ministry of Food. For copies and updates, please contact: DG, FPMU, Khaddya Bhaban, 16 Abdul Ghani Road, Dhaka-1000; [email protected]

i

Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ iiiExecutive summary ........................................................................................................................... ix1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 12. Context ....................................................................................................................................... 33. The CIP2: a powerful tool to achieve the country’s development goals .................................... 54. A nutrition-sensitive food systems approach ............................................................................. 65. Preparation of the CIP2 .............................................................................................................. 86. Guiding principles of the CIP2 .................................................................................................. 117. The CIP2 programmes ............................................................................................................... 148. Anchoring of the CIP2 in FNS national and international frameworks ..................................... 429. Institutional arrangements for coordination and monitoring towards a unified framework for the CIP2 and the SDGs ......................................................................................................... 5010. Results framework, indicators of programmes and impact of investments ............................... 5311. Cost and financing ...................................................................................................................... 6512. Challenges and risks ................................................................................................................... 75Annexes ............................................................................................................................................. 77Annex 1: List of consultations .......................................................................................................... 77Annex 2: Main issues raised during the consultations and recommendations for action ................. 79Annex 3: Synthesis of recommendations and links to the CIP2 programmes and sub-programmes ............................................................................................................... 98Annex 4: Detailed description of each investment programme and sub-programme ...................... 113Annex 5: Details of the cost and financing of the CIP2 ................................................................... 150Annex 6: Specifics of the CIP2 monitoring and evaluation process ................................................ 189

ii

Acronyms and Abbreviations7FYP Seventh Five Year PlanADB Asian Development BankADP Annual Development ProgrammeAFSRD Agriculture, Food Security and Rural DevelopmentAICC Agriculture Information and Communication CentreAIGA Alternative Income Generating ActivityAIS Agriculture Information ServiceAMR Antimicrobial ResistanceAP-DEF Asia-Pacific Development Effectiveness FacilityAPA Annual Performance Agreement APSU Agricultural Policy Support UnitATC Agricultural Technical Committees AusAID Australian Agency for International DevelopmentAWD Alternate Wetting and DryingBAB Bangladesh Accreditation BoardBADC Bangladesh Agricultural Development CorporationBAEC Bangladesh Atomic Energy CommissionBAPA Bangladesh Agro-Processors’ AssociationBARC Bangladesh Agricultural Research CouncilBARI Bangladesh Agricultural Research InstituteBAU Bangladesh Agricultural UniversityBBF Bangladesh Breastfeeding FoundationBBS Bangladesh Bureau of StatisticsBCSA Bangladesh Cold Storage AssociationBCC Behaviour Change CommunicationBCCSAP Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action PlanBCIC Bangladesh Chemical Industries CorporationBCSIR Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial ResearchBDHS Bangladesh Demographic and Health SurveyBDP Bangladesh Delta PlanBEI Blue Economy InitiativesBFD Bangladesh Forest DepartmentBFDC Bangladesh Fisheries Development CorporationBFRI Bangladesh Fisheries Research InstituteBFSA Bangladesh Food Safety AuthorityBFSLN Bangladesh Food Safety Laboratory Network BIDS Bangladesh Institute of Development StudiesBINA Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear AgricultureBIRDEM Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation for Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic DisordersBIRTAN Bangladesh Institute of Research and Training on Applied NutritionBJRI Bangladesh Jute Research InstituteBKMEA Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters AssociationBLRI Bangladesh Livestock Research InstituteBLAST Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services TrustBMDA Barind Multipurpose Development AuthorityBNNC Bangladesh National Nutrition CouncilBOAA beta -N- oxalyl-amino -L -alanineBRC British Retail ConsortiumBRDB Bangladesh Rural Development BoardBRRI Bangladesh Rice Research InstituteBRWSSP Bangladesh Rural Water Supply and Sanitation ProjectBSCIC Bangladesh Small and Cottage Industries Corporation BSMRAU Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University

iii

BSRI Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research InstituteBSTI Bangladesh Standards and Testing InstitutionBWDB Bangladesh Water Development BoardCAB Consumers Association of BangladeshCARS Centre for Advanced Research in SciencesCBA Cost-Benefit AnalysisCDB Cotton Development BoardCDIL Central Disease Investigation LaboratoryCFS Committee on World Food SecurityCGIAR Consultative Group on International Agricultural ResearchCIP Country Investment PlanCIP1 First Country Investment PlanCIP2 Second Country Investment PlanCNRS Center for Natural Resource StudiesCSA Civil Society AllianceCSO Civil Society OrganisationDAE Department of Agricultural ExtensionDAM Department of Agricultural MarketingDANIDA Danish International Development AgencyDATA Data Analysis and Technical AssistanceDC District ControllerDCCI Dhaka Chamber of Commerce IndustryDDM Department of Disaster ManagementDfID Department for International DevelopmentDFTRI Department of Food Technology and Rural IndustriesDG Director-GeneralDGF Directorate General of FoodDGFP Directorate General of Family Planning DGHS Directorate General of Health ServicesDLS Department of Livestock ServicesDNCRP Directorate of National Consumer Rights ProtectionDoE Department of EnvironmentDoF Department of FisheriesDP Development PartnerDPE Directorate of Primary EducationDPHE Department of Public Health EngineeringDSS Department of Social ServicesDTC District Technical CommitteesECA Ecologically Critical AreasEFCC Environment, Forestry and Climate ChangeEKN Embassy of the Kingdom of the NetherlandsEPZ Export Processing Zones ERD Economic Relations DivisionERG Economic Research GroupEU European UnionFAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFBCCI Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce and IndustryFIAC Farmer’s Information and Advisory CentreFLW Food Loss and WasteFNS Food and Nutrition SecurityFPMC Food Planning and Monitoring CommitteeFPMU Food Planning and Monitoring UnitFPWG Food Policy Working Group

iv

FSN Food Security and NutritionFSNSP Food Security Nutritional Surveillance ProjectFYP Five Year PlanG2P Government to PersonGAIN Global Alliance for Improved NutritionGAP Good Agricultural PracticesGDDS General Data Dissemination SystemGFLI Global Food Loss IndexGHG Green House GasGHP Good Hygienic PracticesGIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale ZusammenarbeitGMO Genetically Modified OrganismGMP Good Manufacturing PracticesGoB Government of BangladeshGR Gratuitous ReliefGVC Global Value ChainHACCP Hazard Analysis and Critical Control PointsHIES Household Income and Expenditure SurveyHKI Helen Keller InternationalHPNSDP Health, Population and Nutrition Sector Development ProgrammeHYV High Yielding VarietiesIATI International Aid Transparency InitiativeICDDR,B International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, BangladeshICN2 Second International Conference on NutritionICT Information and Communication TechnologyIDA International Development AssociationIDB Islamic Development BankIDRA Insurance Development Regulatory AuthorityIDTS Inspection, Development and Technical Services IEDCR Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and ResearchIFAD International Fund for Agriculture DevelopmentIFC International Finance CorporationIFPRI International Food Policy Research InstituteIFRC International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent SocietiesIFST Institute of Food Science and TechnologyILO International Labour OrganizationIMD Inclusive Market ApproachIMED Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation DivisionINFS Institute of Nutrition and Food ScienceIPC Integrated Food Security Phase ClassificationIPH Institute of Public HealthIPHN Institute of Public Health and Nutrition IPM Integrated Pest Management IRRI International Rice Research InstituteIUU Illegal, Unregulated and UnreportedIYCF Infant and Young Child Feeding JCS Joint Cooperation StrategyJDCF Japan Debt Cancellation FundJICA Japan International Cooperation AgencyKFW Kreditanstalt für WiederaufbauLCG Local Consultative GroupLCGAFSRD Local Consultative Group on Agriculture, Food Security and Rural DevelopmentLDDMPP Livestock Development based Diary and Meat Production Project

v

LGD Local Government Division, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operativesLGED Local Government Engineering DepartmentLoA Letter of AgreementMAFAP Monitoring and Analysing Food and Agriculture PoliciesMBBS Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of SurgeryMDG Millennium Development GoalMFSP Modern Food Storage Facilities ProjectMICS Multiple Indicator Cluster SurveyMISM Management Information System and MonitoringMIYCN Maternal, Infant and Young Child NutritionMoA Ministry of AgricultureMoCommerce Ministry of CommerceMoDMR Ministry of Disaster Management and ReliefMoEd Ministry of EducationMoEFC Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate ChangeMoF Ministry of FinanceMoFood Ministry of Food MoFL Ministry of Fisheries and LivestockMoHFW Ministry of Health and Family WelfareMoI Ministry of IndustriesMoLE Ministry of Labour and EmploymentMoLGRD&C Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and CooperativesMOP Murate of PotashMoPME Ministry of Primary and Mass EducationMoST Ministry of Science and TechnologyMoSW Ministry of Social WelfareMoU Memorandum of UnderstandingMoWCA Ministry of Women and Children AffairsMoWR Ministry of Water ResourcesMRVA Multi Risk Vulnerability Assessment MappingMSME Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises MTBF Medium-Term Budgetary FrameworkMUCH Meeting the Undernutrition ChallengeNAPA National Adaptation Programme of ActionNARS National Agricultural Research SystemNATCC National Agricultural Technical Coordination Committees NC National CommitteeNCD Non-Communicable DiseaseNCRPC National Consumer Rights Protection CouncilNEC National Economic CouncilNFNSP National Food and Nutrition Security Policy NFP National Food Policy NFPCSP National Food Policy Capacity Strengthening ProgrammeNFSMAC National Food Safety Management Advisory CouncilNFSL National Food Safety LaboratoryNGO Non-Governmental OrganisationNIPN National Information Platform for NutritionNIPORT National Institute of Population Research and TrainingNIPU Nutrition Information and Planning UnitNNP National Nutrition PolicyNNS National Nutrition ServicesNPAN2 Second National Plan of Action for NutritionNSA Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture

vi

NSDS National Strategy for the Development of StatisticsNSSS National Social Security StrategyNWA National Women’s Agency (Jatiyo Mohila Songstha)NWRC National Water Resources CouncilNWRD National Water Resources DatabaseOMS Open Market SalesPA Precision AgriculturePARIS21 Partnership in Statistics for Development in the 21st CenturyPDBF Palli Daridro Bimochon Foundation [Rural Poverty Alleviation Foundation]PE Public ExpenditurePFDS Public Food Distribution SystemPHL - DCC Public Health Laboratory of Dhaka City CorporationPHSC Post-Harvest Service CentrePKSF Palli Karma-Sahayak FoundationPMO Prime Minister’s OfficePoA Plan of ActionPPP Public Private PartnershipPPRC Power and Participation Research CentrePPW Plant Protection WingR&D Research and DevelopmentRC Regional ControllerRDA Rural Development AcademyRDCD Rural Development and Co-operatives DivisionREACH Renewed Efforts Against Child HungerRTC Regional Technical CommitteesRtF&SS Right to Food and Social SecuritySAARC South Asian Association of Regional CooperationSAU Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural UniversitySCA Seed Certification AgencySDDS Special Data Dissemination StandardsSDF Social Development FoundationSDG Sustainable Development GoalSFDF Small Farmers Development FoundationSID Statistics and Informatics DivisionSIS Small Indigenous SpeciesSMART Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-boundSME Small and Medium EnterprisesSOFI State of Food Insecurity in the WorldSOP Standard Operating ProcedureSPF Specific Pathogen FreeSRDI Soil Resource Development InstituteSSN Social Safety NetSSNP Social Safety Net ProgrammesSUN Scaling Up NutritionSVRS Sample Vital Registration SystemTA Technical AssistanceTAT Technical Assistance TeamTMRI Transfer Modality Research InitiativeTSP Triple Super PhosphateTT Thematic TeamTWG Technical Working GroupUESD Utilization of Essential Service DeliveryUN United Nations

vii

UNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeUNFPA United Nations Population FundUNICEF United Nations Children's FundUSAID United States Agency for International DevelopmentUSG Urea Super GranulesVAM Vulnerability Analysis and MappingVGD Vulnerable Group DevelopmentVGF Vulnerable Group FeedingVRA Vulnerability Risk Assessment WARPO Water Resources Planning OrganizationWASH Water, Sanitation and HygieneWB World Bank WDB Water Development BoardWFP World Food ProgrammeWHA World Health AssemblyWHO World Health Organization

viii

Executive summaryThe Bangladesh Second Country Investment Plan 2016-2020 (CIP2) is integral to the multisectoral approach needed to tackle hunger and malnutrition and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It is a tool to mobilise funds and align sectoral and cross-sectoral food and nutrition security (FNS) related programmes. The overarching goal of the CIP2 is to achieve improved food security and nutrition for all at all times by making food systems nutrition-sensitive and sustainable. Its strategic objective is to ensure availability, affordability and nutritional quality of foods, and that all people have access to a variety of safe and nutritious foods, and to the knowledge they need to make wise food choices for a healthy diet. It sets forth priority nutrition-sensitive investment programmes for each stage of the food value chain -‘from production to plate’- as well as emerging challenges to the food systems that impact diets and nutrition.

Attaining the developmental goals that will make Bangladesh a middle-income country will require a transformational change implying a massive increase in mobilisation of resources, profound institution-al capacity development and the much better integration and coordination of actions. The resource delivery mechanism will be mainstreamed with country’s policy and institutional systems. Coherence of initiatives will be ensured at the national and sub-national levels. Supportive guidance will be sought from the Food Planning and Monitoring Committee (FPMC), Bangladesh National Nutrition Council (BNNC) and related high-level governance mechanisms.

The CIP2 represents a powerful tool in the hands of the Government to: (i) assess needs for additional financial resources required to achieve some of the key SDGs and to create a nutrition-sensitive food system that works to ensure food and nutrition security in a coordinated way; (ii) prioritise these invest-ments; (iii) integrate and coordinate actions across sectors and ministries for better effectiveness; and (iv) mobilise resources as required and foster alignment of all sources of financing, including budget resources and contributions from Development Partners (DPs) behind a single, inclusive -but evolving- investment plan which will prevent needs not being fulfilled and avoid same projects appearing in more than one government plan. As Bangladesh embarks upon its Seventh Five Year Plan (7FYP), the invest-ments made towards solving hunger and malnutrition will reflect the complexities of the issue at hand. The CIP2 implementation will build on and provide input to monitoring of SDGs, the upcoming Nation-al Food and Nutrition Security Policy (NFNSP), Second National Plan of Action for Nutrition (NPAN2), related strategies and action plans.

The CIP2 proposes 13 investment programmes to improve food and nutrition security in an integrated way. It is solidly anchored in existing policies and programmatic frameworks and incorporates the priorities expressed by stakeholders, ranging from government agencies to civil society such as Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) or farmers’ organisations to the private sector. The total cost of the CIP2 is estimated at US$ 9.25 billion with US$3.6 billion still requiring funding. This financing gap amounts to US$2.4 billion while prioritising nutrition-weighted funding for nutrition impact.

ix

x

CIP2 Investment programmes (in million US$)

CIP2 Programmes by pillar Total Financing gap

Nutrition-weighted financing gap*

I. Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets 3815 2182.3 1627.2

I.1. Sustainable intensification and diversification of crop-based production systems 622 438.1 328.6

I.2. Improved access, quality and management of agricultural inputs, including water and land 2401 1250.8 928.5

I.3. Enhanced productivity and sustainable production of animal source foods 792 493.4 370.1

II. Efficient and nutrition-sensitive post-harvest transformation and value addition 3172 1246.9 623.4

II.1. Strengthened post-harvest value chain with particular focus on MSMEs (storage, processing, branding, labelling, marketing and trade)

437 383.8 191.9

II.2. Improved access to markets, facilities and information 2735 863.1 431.5

III. Improved dietary diversity, consumption and utilisation 228 53.9 43.0

III.1. Enhanced nutrition knowledge, promotion of good practices, and consumption of safe and nutritious diets

89 53.8 42.9

III.2. Optimised food utilisation through provision of safe water, improved food hygiene and sanitation 139 0.1 0.1

IV. Enhanced access to social protection and safety nets and increased resilience 1808 55.2 41.4

IV.1. Timely and effective disaster preparedness and response through emergency food distribution, steps towards agricultural sector rehabilitation and mitigation measures

962 0.8 0.6

IV.2. Strengthened cash and food based programmes for targeted groups across the life cycle including disabled and displaced populations

846 54.4 40.8

V. Strengthened enabling environment and cross-cutting programmes for achieving food and nutrition security

227 90.5 62.9

V.1. Improved food safety, quality control and assurance, awareness on food safety and hygiene 83 70.8 53.1

0 0 0 etsaw dna sessol doof decudeR .2.VV.3. Improved information and data for evidence-based

monitoring and adjustment of policies and programmes

46 1.3 0.6

V.4. Improved FNS governance, capacity strengthening and leadership across FNS relevant stakeholders 98 18.4 9.2

Grand Total 9250 3628.7 2397.9

The development of this nutrition-sensitive CIP2 with national stakeholders serves to highlight the areas of investment required to achieve FNS goals and will help mobilise and channel resources to the areas most effective in improving the nutrition outcomes of the country.

* Weighing the budget according to nutrition sensitivity as detailed in Table A5.1.

Official

Typewritten Text

Official

Typewritten Text

Official

Typewritten Text

1Second Country Investment Plan

1. IntroductionPrioritising agriculture, food and nutrition security has been central to the Government of Bangladesh’s (GoB) development strategy since the birth of the nation and has yielded impressive results. The goals set in the 2006 National Food Policy (NFP) regarding the reduction of underweight and stunting of children under five and population level undernourishment have been achieved. Yet, these successes conceal critical numbers of people still suffering from the effects of poverty, hunger and malnutrition which the Government endeavours to address rapidly.

The GoB recognises that addressing hunger and malnutrition should not only be a goal in itself but a means to achieve other development goals. Malnutrition in all its forms -undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, overweight and obesity- results in high economic and social costs. Nutrient deficiency in children affects school attainment in the same way that inadequate nutrition worsens the mental and physical productivity of the labour force, thereby decreasing economic growth. Other examples of the effect of nutrition on socio-economic development abound, and in its efforts to bring Bangladesh to the status of middle-income country, the GoB is fully taking this on board. Accordingly, it has embraced the global agenda set by the UN’s post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which, in their endeavour to eradicate poverty in all its dimensions, aim at ending hunger, achieving food security and improved nutrition, and promoting sustainable agriculture (SDG2). But it also acknowledges the need for nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive actions across the entire food system to achieve the 16 other SDGs.

By joining the SUN (Scaling Up Nutrition) movement in 2011, the country also committed to intensify-ing direct nutrition interventions and advancing nutrition-sensitive development, helping to build multi-stakeholder platforms across sectors, and aligning their programmes. It reaffirmed its commit-ment during the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organi-zation (WHO) Second International Conference on Nutrition (ICN2) in Rome in 2014 which sought to identify comprehensive solutions to address malnutrition, placing a strong emphasis on the role of food systems. The GoB also endorsed the six global nutrition targets and their indicators to be achieved by 2025 at the World Health Assembly (WHA) in 2012.

The Bangladesh Second Country Investment Plan (CIP2) follows the First Country Investment Plan 2011-20151 (CIP1) whose development was prompted in response to a need to efficiently mobilise resources in the aftermath of the 2008 food price crisis. As Bangladesh embarks upon its Seventh Five Year Plan (7FYP), the investments made towards solving hunger and malnutri-tion will reflect the complexities of the issue at hand. The CIP2 2016-2020 is integral to the multi-sectoral approach needed to tackle hunger and malnutrition and achieve the SDGs. It is a tool to mobilise funds and align sectoral and cross-sectoral food and nutrition security related programmes. The overarching goal of the CIP2 is to achieve improved food security and nutrition for all at all times by making food systems nutrition-sensitive and sustainable. Its strategic objective is to ensure availabili-ty, affordability and nutritional quality of foods, and that all people have access to a variety of safe and nutritious foods, and to the knowledge they need to make healthy diet choices. It sets forth priority nutrition-sensitive investment programmes for each stage of the food value chain -‘from production to plate’- as well as emerging challenges to the food systems.

Before describing the investment programmes and 1 The CIP1 was later extended to last until 2016.

Genaral Economics Division (GED)Planning CommisionGoverment of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh

thFIVE YEAR PLANFY2016 - FY2020FY2016 - FY2020Accelerating Growth, Empowering Citizens

sub-programmes proposed by the CIP2, the main body of this document sets the context, including its linkages to existing frameworks and policies, its objectives and the approach adopted. It describes the process by which the CIP2 was developed and the guiding principles on which it is based. It then goes on to detail the institutional set up for the coordination and monitoring of the programme implementa-tion and outlines the results framework. The cost of each programme and sub-programme is then set out. The annex provides further details on the consultations carried out, on the programmes and sub-programmes and on the monitoring and evaluation of the plan. It also provides details on the finan-cial aspect of the programmes, including an inventory of the existing and proposed projects under different CIP2 programmes.

The CIP2 was prepared by the GoB under the coordination of the Food Planning and Monitoring Unit (FPMU) of the Ministry of Food with contributions from a wide range of ministries, agencies and departments, donors, civil society, the private sector and NGOs, reflecting the breadth of the food systems approach adopted.

2 Second Country Investment Plan

2. ContextOver the last three decades, Bangladesh has managed the feat of producing enough rice to keep up with population growth -which almost doubled to 160 million. In terms of calorie availability, it has achieved self-sufficiency. People’s economic capacity to access food has risen through a rapid decline in the poverty headcount -from 48.9% in 2000 to 23.2% in 20162 -, 90% of which is accounted for by agriculture3 and an increasing purchasing power even among the poorest. With regards to food utilisa-tion and nutrition, the third dimension of food security, it also claims ‘the fastest prolonged reductions in child undernutrition in recorded history’4.

Notwithstanding these impressive achievements, much remains to be done if Bangladesh is to ensure the food and nutrition security of its people and unlock their productive potential. Alarming numbers of people still suffer from hunger, acute hunger and seasonal hunger and the prevalence of child undernu-trition is high, much above the WHO cut off levels of public health significance. While 2015 Millenni-um Development Goals (MDGs) concerning the prevalence of undernourishment in the population and underweight for children younger than five were achieved, around 16% of the population remains undernourished and one third of young children are underweight. Stunting, whose causes begin in utero and continues for at least the first two years of postnatal life, and whose consequences are life-long -diminished cognitive, educational and economic performance, poor health- and last across generations, continues to affect 37% of children under five. Concurrently, the prevalence of overweight and obesity is steadily rising, even among the poorer sections of the population, leading to a rise in non-communica-ble diseases such as of diabetes, cardio-vascular diseases and certain cancers.

The causes of malnutrition and hunger are wide-ranging and are exacerbated by a host of challenges that continue to afflict the country: low quality diets; the rapid growth of an already sizeable population which stretches existing resources; gender disparities in income, opportunities, education and health; climate change which further shrinks the natural resources available -habitable and arable land, sweet water, etc.-; and price volatility.

In response to the rising need for food, agricultural growth has risen, albeit irregularly, over the last few years, reaching the target set in the CIP1. Specific efforts have been made notably through investments channeled through the CIP1, to improve water management and infrastructure for irrigation purposes5, but also to improve the quality of inputs and soil fertility6. The share of cropped area under irrigation steadily expanded over the course of the CIP1 for example, and agricultural credit disbursement soared. In a context where climate change is rapidly taking its toll on the country’s economy and agriculture, with among others, the fall in agricultural land availability at 0.45% per annum over the last decade, a new approach of intensive crop production that is both highly productive but also environmentally sustainable needs7 to be adopted. An eco-friendly approach is required which is adapted to the needs of smallholders, combines traditional methods and conservation agriculture with modern technology, and protects natural resources, while increasing productivity. Indeed, climate change and natural resource depletion place stress on food production and increase the volatility of supply. Also, animal source food supply contributes to climate change through increased carbon dioxide emissions.

Over the CIP1 period, agriculture has clearly shown signs of diversification with the fisheries and livestock sector growing steadily towards improving nutritional security, a trend that needs to be main-tained. However, crop diversification towards non-cereal crops and commercial high value crops has been limited. Efforts are needed to diversify crops -without compromising rice production given the population pressure. Agricultural diversification is key not only to ensure better quality diets, boost farmers’ incomes and value addition, but also ease the country’s agricultural trade deficit by producing tropical fruits and vegetables instead of importing them.

2 The 2016 figure is an interim BBS figure based on quarterly figures and therefore not using the same methodology used for previous years. It does, however, give a sense of the overall falling trend.

3 As found by the World Bank (http://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2016/10/07/bangla-desh-growing-economy-through-advances-in-agriculture).

4 WFP (2016) Strategic Review of Food Security and Nutrition in Bangladesh5 Programme 2 of the CIP16 Programme 3 of the CIP17 Such as the ‘Save and Grow’ approach advocated by FAO since 2011


Overall, farming systems can only be transformed from semi-subsistence to more productive and com-mercial ones by creating less fragmented, more competitive supply chains that respond to quality stand-ards and include those that are usually excluded, women in particular. The CIP1 Programme 6 concen-trated on building new growth centres also prompted the spontaneous growth of centres through private means. Private sector participation needs to be further stimulated along the value chain with invest-ments in infrastructure building and maintenance such as markets or roads.

For the many still unable to access adequate diets for lack of resources and income making opportuni-ties, social protection that is suited to their circumstances will need to ensure their adequate FNS. Groups temporarily affected by disasters must be dealt with differently than for example vulnerable elderly people with no means to provide for themselves, abandoned women or disabled people. While answers are needed to immediately tackle the problem, longer term solutions also need to be identified.

Further down the food value chain comes the challenge of translating the consumption of good quality diets into efficient utilisation of the nutrients ingested which is still threatened by the consumption of unsafe water, poor sanitation and hygiene practices. Diarrhea is still a frequent phenomenon and the supply of safe water for domestic use has remained static despite efforts8. With the accelerating pace of urbanisation, slums are bourgeoning bringing with them the water and sanitation challenges associated with very high density urban environments. Therapeutic and supplementary feeding as proposed in the CIP19 also needs to continue to remedy enduring acute nutritional deficits in the short-run.

While there is enough evidence to establish desirable dietary patterns that are beneficial for preventing malnutrition in all its forms, dietary guidelines have not been accompanied by desirable changes in the dietary patterns. Trans fat intake is increasing and ultra-processed foods and sugar sweetened beverages in diets are on the rise.

Food wastage at all stages of the food supply chain is a factor that needs to be tackled if the country wants to meet the food and nutrition needs of its people. FAO estimates that up to a third of the food produced is never consumed worldwide. The nutritional value of the food that makes it onto the plate needs to be maximised by adapting the treatment and transformation of food post production. Measures to reduce waste and losses at production, marketing and distribution level are also required. The country also faces a substantial challenge in ensuring that the foods available are safe for consumption. The Food Safety Act of 2013 sets the legal framework to solve this problem, but its implementation will require a lot of strengthening of capacities, a review of the standards and an enhanced coordination between all stakeholders.

To respond to these challenges, the CIP2 proposes a series of investment programmes to improve food and nutrition security in an integrated way. It is solidly anchored in existing policies and programmatic frameworks as detailed in Section 8 and incorporates the priorities expressed by stakeholders, ranging from government agencies to civil society such as NGOs or farmers’ organisations to the private sector.

The CIP1 was successful in its role of mobilising funds towards the implementation of the NFP. Its periodic monitoring allowed for a regular and dynamic review of the country’s needs making the Coun-try Investment Plan (CIP) a ‘living document’. However, the food systems approach adopted for CIP2 means that implementing the plan will be a complex task given the wide range of actors across sectors, processes and linkages between them that will need to provide feedback through the annual monitoring process. The Government’s institutional and governance framework will need to be ready for this challenge and capacities to carry out these tasks will need ever more strengthening in this respect.

8 See Programme 12 of the CIP19 Programme 10.3


3. The CIP2: a powerful tool to achieve the country’s development goalsBangladesh can only achieve the medium and long-term goals set in the National Food Policy, the Seventh Five Year Plan, its Vision 2021 and the 2030 SDGs if it is able to mobilise adequate financial resources, prioritise investments and use domestic and external resources effectively. To this effect, finance is recognised by the SDG agenda as the first of the five ‘means of implementation’. SDG 17 aims at strengthening these means of implementation and target 17.3 aims to ‘mobilise additional finan-cial resources for developing countries from multiple sources’. The 2030 agenda refers to the Addis Ababa Action Agenda on Financing for Development, adopted in July 2015, in which countries re-af-firm that they ‘remain committed to further strengthening the mobilisation and effective use of domestic resources’ and that they ‘recognise that significant additional domestic public resources, supplemented by international assistance as appropriate, will be critical to realising sustainable development and achieving the sustainable development goals’.

Attaining the developmental goals that will make Bangladesh a middle-income country will require a transformational change implying a massive increase in mobilisation of resources, profound institution-al capacity development and the much better integration of actions. The CIP2 represents a powerful tool in the hands of the Government to:

(i) assess needs for additional financial resources required to achieve some of the key SDGs and to create a nutrition-sensitive food system that works to ensure food and nutrition security in a coordinated way;

(ii) prioritise these investments giving precedence to the most nutrition-sensitive ones; (iii) integrate and coordinate actions across sectors and ministries for better effectiveness; and(iv) mobilise resources as required and foster alignment of all sources of financing, including

budget resources and contributions from Development Partners (DPs) behind a single, inclu-sive -but evolving- investment plan which will prevent needs not being fulfilled and avoid same projects appearing in more than one government plan.

The ‘SDGs Needs Assessment and Financing Strategy: Bangladesh Perspective’10 provides a well-de-fined work plan that highlights all the actions necessary to attain significant progress in the SDGs in Bangladesh. As per the 7FYP extended growth scenario, the aggregate GDP at constant 2015-2016 prices for the period 2017-2030 would be Taka 498,900.3 billion11. Estimates of annual resource gaps available in the strategy provide an opportunity to highlight programme priorities and government policy interventions as in this case, those relevant to nutrition-sensitive food systems.

10 General Economics Division, Planning Commission, GoB. (2017) SDGs needs assessment and financing strategy: Bangladesh perspective

11 USD 5,004.99 billion.


4. A nutrition-sensitive food systems approachThe CIP1 built on the 2006 NFP which constituted a fundamental shift in acknowledging the compre-hensive nature of food and nutrition insecurity by focusing on three objectives to ensure dependable sustained food security for all people of the country at all times, adequate and stable supply of safe and nutritious food, increased purchasing power and access to food by all, and adequate nutrition for all individuals, especially women and children.

While the overall goal of the CIP2 remains the same, the approach taken is to consider the food system in its entirety i.e. a system ‘that embraces all elements (environment, people, inputs, processes, infra-structure, institutions, markets and trade) and activities that relate to the production, processing, distri-bution and marketing, preparation and consumption of food and the outputs of these activities, includ-ing socio-economic and environmental outcomes’12 (Figure 1). This approach is better suited to the 2012 Committee on World Food Security definition of food and nutrition security that has been widely adopted following ICN2: ‘Food and nutrition security exists when all people at all times have physical, social and economic access to food, which is consumed in sufficient quantity and quality to meet their dietary needs and food preferences, and is supported by an environment of adequate sanitation, health services and care, allowing for a healthy and active life.’

The food systems approach acknowledges the substantial overlaps and interlinkages between different components of the food system. For example, the way a household consumes will be influenced by its knowledge of nutrition, its preferences and cultural practices, but also by market prices and advertise-ments by big companies. This approach goes beyond the traditional linear approach where producers supply food to the food processors. Producers can also be consumers and involved in post-harvest processing. They may belong to a vulnerable group that is supported, or needs to be, by social safety nets. Food systems thus involve multiple interactions between different actors and stakeholders involved at different stages of the food value chain13 that evolve in a complex setting -institutions, processes, natural environment, etc.- that can be influenced to enable more favourable FNS outcomes (Figure 1).

A good understanding of these linkages is important to identify entry points for nutrition-sensitive investments along the food system that can trigger structural changes that will result in positive nutri-tion-related outcomes. This identification and prioritisation of investments towards the achievement of FNS also need to acknowledge the need for environmental, economic and social sustainability as embedded in the SDGs.

There are many pathways to adjusting agricultural strategies to improve nutrition outcomes. Providing information to farmers on the existence of crops that will benefit diets in bringing food and nutrient diversity that may be profitable to them, or by breeding animals that are rich in key micronutrients, are some of them. Actions that can retain the nutritional benefits of food can also be incorporated in programmes relating to post-harvesting and preservation activities. For instance, improved drying techniques can prevent contamination of foods. Certain ways of processing or preparing foods can add or decrease their nutritional content. There are also many ways to rendering social protection programmes nutrition-sensitive: targeting the most nutritionally vulnerable is one, but it could also be making women the recipients of benefits since they are shown to be more inclined to spend financial resources on the health and nutrition of family members compared to their male counterparts. Food systems can also affect food safety, health, food prices, incomes and women’s access to productive resources, all of which influence nutrition.

12 As defined by the UN High Level Task Force of Global Food and Nutrition.13 The cross-references between the different programmes proposed under the CIP demonstrate these linkages.



By prioritising projects that are nutrition-sensitive over those that are nutrition-specific or merely support nutrition14, this document endeavours to guide Government and DP spending over the life-span of the CIP2 towards projects that will directly impact the nutritional outcomes of the country.

This nutrition-sensitive food systems’ approach adopted in the CIP2 will help in shaping the upcoming National Food and Nutrition Security Policy (NFNSP) that is to be formulated and approved by 2019.

Figure 1. Attempting to capture the complexities of food systems15

14 Section 11 details how this prioritisation is carried out.15 FLW stands for food loss and waste which can arise at every step of the food value chain.

PROG

RAMM

ING

E

NVIRONMENT

MARKETS AND TRADE POLICIES INFRASTRUCTURE PROCESSES

NUTRITION EDUCATION

INPU

TS

FLW

Food Lossand Waste

(FLW)

FLW

FLW

FLW

FLW

TransportProduction

Consumption

Preparation Distribution

Marketing

Processing

NGOs

LawenforcersExtension

workers

Researchers

Policymakers

Healthworkers Community

workers

Teachers

Producers

Women

Elderly

Consumers

Children

Adolescentgirlsgroups

vulnerable

5. Preparation of the CIP2To succeed to the CIP1, the 7FYP requires the CIP2 to be prepared to cover the 2016/17 to 2019/20 fiscal years. To this effect, in June 2016, a notification was issued by the Government for the Technical Working Groups (TWGs) to begin the process. The background work towards its preparation was initiated in July 2016 with a series of 32 meetings by the TWGs spanning a period of six months. During these meetings, the decision was taken to shift from a focus on the three objectives of the NFP (availa-bility of, access to and utilisation of food) to five areas that cover all aspects of the food value chain -‘production to plate’-as well as all the challenges to the food systems, namely:

1. Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets2. Post-harvest transformation, value addition, nutrition and supply 3. Improved dietary diversity, consumption and utilisation4. Enhanced access to social protection and safety nets and increased resilience5. Strengthened enabling environment for achieving food and nutrition security and cross-sectoral

issues.

In parallel, six background papers were commissioned to national technical experts to provide an analytical narrative of the progress observed in the areas of investment identified by the Food Policy Working Group (FPWG), flag issues and provide actionable recommendations to inform the develop-ment and implementation of the CIP2. The pillar on ‘Strengthened enabling environment for achieving food and nutrition security and cross-sectoral issues’ gave rise to two separate papers, to better reflect the heterogeneity of the issues it covered, namely:

• Improved food safety and quality and reduced food losses and waste• Governance, cross policy implementation and FNS information.

In April 2017, the authors of the papers presented their findings to FPMU officials and the Technical Assistance Team (TAT) of the Meeting the Undernutrition Challenge (MUCH) project which supports the GoB in its work on the NFP and CIP. Based on the feedback from the first in-house consultation, a revised set of draft thematic background papers were prepared. These background papers provided the technical context and foundation to the CIP2. The TWG meetings and papers led to the identification of 13 programmes for investment. These programmes and the contents of the sub-programmes were refined through an extensive consultation process.

Following the identification of programmes and sub-programmes, government agencies were requested to identify current projects and potential projects that should fall under the CIP2. This process was facil-itated by FPMU under the guidance of the Director-General (DG) of FPMU and leadership of the Secre-tary, Ministry of Food.

The consultation process

Consultations were held across the country using different approaches and venues -villages, universi-ties, upazila offices- to maximise the feedback received from different stakeholders. About 400 individ-uals -around 20% of them female- participated to these events. Representatives from 18 ministries/divi-sions’ agencies and departments, and 26 organisations from Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), the private sector, DPs and the United Nations (UN) attended. Table 1 provides the detail of the participat-ing institutions.



A first consultation was held on the 9th of May 2017 with the participation of FPMU, the TWG, the Thematic Teams (TTs), the Bangladesh National Nutrition Council (BNNC), the authors of the back-ground papers and the MUCH TAT. The main objectives of the consultation were to: explain the CIP context; share the framework and objectives, CIP methodology and development; engage in an open discussion to solicit feedback on the approach and papers; and elicit questions on policy priorities that could serve as a basis for questions for key informants during upcoming field consultations.

Over two weeks in May 2017, ten consultations took place across five divisions of the country (see Annex 1 for details). These meetings included farmers, local leaders and villagers, local government officials from Food Security and Nutrition (FSN) relevant ministries at district and upazila levels, NGOs and academic faculty members. In the consultations involving local government officials, after an introduction explaining the background to the CIP, the purpose and the methodology of the exercise as well as the importance of taking a nutrition-sensitive approach by FPMU officials with support by FAO, remarks were provided by special guests from the relevant district. The attendees were then randomly divided into groups to identify priorities for the CIP2 for each of the broad areas of invest-ment previously identified for the CIP2 by the TWGs in the context of their region. A set of questions were given to them to guide them through the process. The FAO team and FPMU officials facilitated these parallel sessions. A representative from each group was then asked to present the main points identified in a plenary, before opening the floor up for discussions.

In sessions with farmers and villagers, less emphasis was placed on formally presenting the rationale for the CIP2 and discussions took place with the whole group. Explicit efforts were made to elicit womens' point of view.

The session held at the Bangladesh Agricultural University in Mymensingh which brought together accomplished academics from disciplines covering a broad range of topics related to food systems was

Table 1. Participating institutions

BNNC Cabinet Division Ministry of Agriculture:

Secretariat; DAE, BADC; DAM; BRRI; BARI; BARC; SRDI; BSRI; BINA

Ministry of Disaster Management: Secretariat

Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock: DoF, DLS; Secretariat

Ministry of Food: Secretariat; BFSA; RC Food/DC Food

Ministry of Health: IPHN; Civil Surgeon office

Ministry of Industries: BSTI, BAB

Ministry of Planning: BBS Ministry of Primary and Mass

Education Ministry of Public

Administration: District Commissioner

Ministry of Social Welfare: DSS

Ministry of Water Resources: BWDB

MoWCA: Secretariat Planning Commission

ADB DfID European Union EKN Global Affairs Canada USAID World Bank

Universities/Research Institutes

BAU BIDS BSMRAU BRAC University Center for Natural

Resource Studies (CNRS) Dhaka University

Economic Research Group (ERG)

IFPRI/IRRI Oxford Policy Management Power and Participation

Research Centre (PPRC) Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural

University (SAU)

Development PartnersGovernment United Nations

FAO UN Women UNICEF United Nations Development

Programme (UNDP) International Labour

Organization (ILO) World Food Programme (WFP) World Health Organization

(WHO)

CSOs

Action Aid Action Contre la Faim Alive and Thrive BAPA BBF BIRDEM BRAC CAB Care Bangladesh Caritas Bangladesh CIP-International Potato

Center and AVRDC -The World Vegetable Center

Civil Society Alliance (CSA) for SUN

Concern Worldwide Eco Social Development

Organization FHI 360 Bangladesh Harvest Plus GAIN German Red Cross Helen Keller IFRC Islamic Relief Nutrition International

Bangladesh Oxfam PKSF Plan International RDRS Right to Food Save the Children Shushilan Winrock International World Fish

Private Sector / Media

APEX Bangladesh Knitwear

Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA)

Colombia Garments Dhaka Chamber of Commerce

and Industry (DCCI) Data Analysis and Technical

Assistance (DATA) DBL Group Dnet FBCCI Fresh Group of Companies Lenny Fashions PRAN-RFL Group

Media - Bangladesh Betar Media- BTV Media - Maasranga Television Media - New Age Media- Prothom Alo

ICDDR,B

slightly different in nature. In this case, following an introduction of the rationale behind the consulta-tions, participants were grouped according to their specialty and asked to discuss specifically the draft list of CIP2 programmes and sub-programmes already prepared. Some of the proposed programmes and sub-programmes were challenged while gaps were also identified. The consultation held with the private sector in July 2017 was organised around three broad discussion points: i) Does the draft CIP2 adequately address the development strategies and priorities concerned with the private sector in terms of achieving food and nutrition security in Bangladesh? What are the missing elements or sub-programmes? Business opportunities? Win-win solutions? ii) How can the ongoing and planned investment activities and projects of the private sector be incorporated in the new CIP to better depict the real situation of investment in food and nutrition security in Bangladesh? iii) How can we better achieve food and nutrition security in collaboration with the private sector? What would be the concrete steps necessary to make the private sector involved more in policy dialogue and coordination with other multi-stakeholders, including government, CSOs and resource partners?

One final consultation was held with the DPs, UN agencies, CSOs and academia in July 2017 to elicit their views on the draft of the CIP2. The following questions were put to the participants: i) Does the CIP2 draft adequately address the government’s development strategies and priorities concerned with DPs, UN, CSOs, research institutions and academia in terms of achieving food and nutrition security? ii) Which area of the CIP2 would your agency most likely provide support or contribute to? iii) How can the Government better achieve food and nutrition security in collaboration with its partners: DPs, UN, CSOs, research institutions and academia? What would be the concrete steps necessary to strength-en the engagement of all the parties/stakeholders in policy dialogue and coordination? Based on their comments, as relevant, modifications were made to the draft of the CIP2.

The Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture held in 2016 helped to conceptualise the CIP2 and paved the way for nutrition-sensitive approaches to be taken into consideration by the CIP2. Likewise, discussions held during the Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection held in 2017 provided suggestions and comments incorporated in the final CIP2 version.

Outcomes of the consultations

By ensuring that stakeholders’ views are reflected in the CIP2, the consultations contributed to building ownership, making it a country-led programme, one of the 2009 Summit on Food Security Rome Principles which the international community endorsed as governing guidelines for FNS interventions. The consultations also reiterated some of the principles that guided the CIP1 and put forward additional ones, reflecting emerging priorities (see Section 6). They also confirmed some of the key programmatic issues identified in the TWG meetings and in the background papers, and uncovered additional ones. Finally, they provided the elements needed to develop the sub-programmes and priority investments required to achieve FNS as detailed in Section 717 .

17 The detail of the issues that were flagged in the consultations and suggestions for priority investments is reported in Annex 2 and are synthesised in Annex 3 where they are also juxtaposed with the corresponding programme and sub-programme.


6. Guiding principles of the CIP2Underlying the implementation of the CIP2 are a series of guiding principles which characterise the terms by which the GoB, the DPs and all other food system stakeholders -the private sector, NGOs, farmer organisations, consumer groups, researchers- will work to achieve the CIP2 goal.

Policy and institutional coherence

The CIP2 provides a clear framework with common objectives that stakeholders can align to. It is anchored in existing national policies and encourages policy coherence and coordination with related policy frameworks, programmes and monitoring tools, in line with the principles agreed to at the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan in 2011. Its delivery mechanism will be main-streamed with the country policy and institutional systems. Efforts will also be made to ensure coher-ence of initiatives at the national and sub-national level. Supportive guidance will be sought from the FPMC and BNNC.

Resource mobilisation

The CIP2 galvanises investments towards country’s most urgent needs as defined jointly by stakehold-ers and encourages investment partnerships. It can help reduce duplication of efforts and allows devel-opment cooperation to be more predictable thus allowing for a more efficient government planning. It acknowledges the existence of other related investment plans on nutrition, climate change, etc. and seeks to build complementarities with them, as applicable. In particular, synergy will be established with the Second National Plan of Action for Nutrition (NPAN2), the National Social Security Strategy (NSSS) and the Bangladesh Environment, Forestry and Climate Change Country Investment Plan (2016-2021).

A nutrition-sensitive food systems approach

The CIP2 adopts a nutrition-sensitive food systems approach to encapsulate the most urgent needs for investment along the food value chain (see Section 4). Nutrition must be rooted in local food systems based on food sovereignty, small-scale producers, agro-ecological principles, sustainable use of natural resources, local seeds and livestock breeds, traditional knowledge and practice, local markets, guaran-teeing sustainable and resilient biodiversity as well as diversity of diets18. By putting nutrition at the centre, it also stresses its commitment to the SUN and Renewed Efforts Against Child Hunger (REACH) initiatives. Concomitantly, it involves all sectors -18 ministries and divisions-, DPs, private sector agents and civil society stakeholders whose involvement is needed to achieve food and nutrition security for all at all times.

Inclusiveness, participation and dialogue for a ‘living document’

In keeping with the CIP1, the CIP2 endeavours to be a collaborative effort from inception to implemen-tation to monitoring. Ensuring that all stakeholders, including those at sub-national level such as farm-ers’ organisations, participate in continuous dialogues throughout the life of the CIP2, can improve its effectiveness, governance and accountability as well as the consistency of its approaches across the country. Such involvement in processes can also encourage the private sector or NGOs to mobilise their own resources to contribute to the implementation of the CIP. The annual monitoring reports of the CIP allow for an integration of improvements and adaptations that may arise from exchanges between stake-holders or from emerging issues, making the plan a dynamic ‘living document’. In addition to this, the gradual move of focus from process-orientation to result-orientation provides an objective basis to evaluate overall performance of the ministry/division at the end of the year which is in line with the Annual Performance Agreement of the Government.

18 ICN2 (2015) Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Secretariat on the Conference


Sustainability

In line with the CIP1, the CIP2 is designed and is to be implemented in a way that ensures coherence with the national and international policy and strategy landscape, quality, impact but also sustainability. All projects must be environmentally sustainable but also, to the extent possible, contribute to mitigat-ing the effects of climate change. This issue of sustainability concerns agricultural practices but also consumption patterns that may be promoted as part of the CIP2. Sustainability of projects should also be understood in terms of their ability to sustain their effects beyond the life of the project for a long-term impact.

Focus on women’s empowerment

Women’s empowerment and gender equality are at the nexus of the agriculture, nutrition and health sectors. Women play an essential role along the food system value chain and in the nutrition of their families. They often have a say on which crops and varieties to grow, eat, and sell. They are increasingly active as labour -paid or unpaid- for pre-and post-harvesting activities e.g. planting of seedlings and saplings, irrigation, harvesting, threshing, storing seeds, nursery management, jute extraction, vegetable plantation, horticulture, preparation of bio and compost fertiliser. With the rapid ‘feminisation’ of agriculture, giving women farmers adequate access to assets such as land and inputs, training but also women-friendly markets are essential. Women also mostly manage household food preparation and consumption, making them ideal targets for nutrition-specific and sensitive programmes that can provide adequate and healthy food especially to children in their formative years. As the bearers of children, their own nutritional status matters in providing the nutrients required for brain development, healthy growth and a strong immune system to babies in the womb and while they are being breastfed. A final consideration are the trade-offs in the allocation of time to the dual productive and reproductive roles of women. More time spent on the farm or work place will result in less time spent raising children which may negatively affect children’s nutritional status unless effective alternatives for child care can be found. Despite their critical and potentially transformative role in agriculture growth, women contin-ue to be limited in their access to resources. The CIP2 must contribute to their empowerment so that they can achieve their full potential.

Targeting of the most vulnerable Adequate emphasis must be put on reaching the most vulnerable strata of the population with effective targeting and prioritisation mechanisms put in place. This includes women and children but also marginalised minorities and populations most vulnerable to the effects of climate change and geograph-ical remoteness. In particular, the South of the country is experiencing a higher incidence of cyclones and storm surges, and the coastal belt suffers from salinity intrusion. In the North, extreme temperatures and droughts are arising challenges. Loss of land due to river erosion is bringing new migrants to the capital who live in poor or inadequate hygiene conditions and have limited access to clean water, which has dire consequences on their nutritional status.

Enhanced partnerships with emphasis on Public Private Partnerships (PPPs)

Partnerships between stakeholders will be encouraged for a better performance of the CIP2. Collabora-tion may be in the form of information and knowledge sharing but also between the private sector and the Government or DPs. Bangladesh pioneered PPPs in South Asia in the 1990s and such mechanism should be embraced as an effective mechanism to deliver actions under the CIP2. To this effect, the GoB has put in place a conducive legal framework19 and is looking to build strong bilateral relationships with other governments to develop and upgrade large public infrastructure assets in partnership with other countries through PPPs20 . While actual PPP budgets cannot be included in the CIP2, projects working to develop concepts, policies, design, technically assist and generally facilitate and promote PPPs will be encouraged. 19 Through the Bangladesh Public Private Partnership Act 2015 which was specifically passed by Parliament as part of the

Vision 2021 goal to ensure a more rapid, inclusive growth trajectory, and to better meet the need for enhanced, high quality public infrastructure services in a fiscally sustainable manner.

20 As set out in the Policy for Implementing PPP Projects through Government to Government (G2G) Partnership, 2017.12 Second Country Investment Plan

Cross-sectoral partnerships may be facilitated by third parties: for example, the SUN Movement helps address issues of conflict of interest in such partnerships to clarify rules of engagement of all partners and avoid conflicts of interest. This is essential if the private sector is to be involved in solving the prob-lem of food insecurity and under- and malnutrition. Successful partnerships allow for the comparative advantage of different stakeholders to be exploited and identify the financial and incentive arrange-ments that align the interest of all parties. The rapid development in recent years of social enterprises whereby the private sector engages in activities that to contribute to poverty reduction should be tapped into, while also adopting an Inclusive Market Approach (IMD) where emphasis is put on making markets work for the poor.

Embrace innovation, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and scale up

The CIP2 will continue to encourage investments in innovation and new technologies for greater impact on food and nutrition security. The role of ICTs as foreseen by the GoB in its promotion of a ‘digital Bangladesh’ will be embraced for example through GIS-based soil mapping system to provide informa-tion relating to crop suitability, land zoning, nutrient status and fertiliser or the creation of information tele-centres to deliver information to farmers. Efforts to monitor public food stock through computer-ised means should also be stepped up for more effective planning by the GoB, notably with respect to its Public Food Distribution System. Emphasis will be placed on rapidly scaling up innovations that have been found to be successful.


21Close to 90% of farm households are small or marginal and farm between 0.0.5 and 2.49 acres.

7. The CIP2 programmesThis chapter describes the 13 CIP programmes: their expected outputs, the justification for the programme in question, the priority interventions by sub-programme and the recommendations for implementation. Table 2 summarises the information and indicates the agencies responsible for the implementation of each of the programmes.

OUTCOME I: Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets

Programme I.1. Sustainable intensification and diversification of crop-based production systems

Expected programme aggregate output: The use of agricultural land to provide affordable and healthy diets to all is optimised by enhancing overall productivity and growing high value and nutritious crops in a sustainable way that is resilient to climate change.

Justification for this programme: In the context of a rapidly growing population and shrinking arable land and ever more erratic weather patterns, crop-based production needs to be stimulated to improve productivity of staples while releasing land for other crop and non-crop foods that are high-value, nutri-tious and increase the diversity of diets. The research and technology development that can provide these improvements must generate sustainable solutions that will not negatively impact on soil fertility and can work in the context of the changes happening due to climate change. Crop production also needs attention because a large number of people, many of them among the poorer segments of vulnera-ble sections of the population21- rely on it for their livelihood.

Priority interventions

I.1.1. Enhance agricultural research and knowledge and technology development for a more productive, diverse, sustainable and nutrition-sensitive agriculture Research and technology development is required to support the development of sustainable high yield-ing and high-value varieties that make efficient use of inputs -hybrid, green super rice-; of varieties adapted to different ecosystems and ensuring year-round availability of nutritious foods -short maturing Aus and Aman rice, summer season hybrid vegetables, lean and year-round season fruits-; and of varie-ties that are naturally rich in key elements such as iron and zinc or are biofortified. Steps will be taken to develop the cultivation of crops such as khesari, mugbean, watermelon, vegetables, cowpea, sesame, sunflower, groundnut, sweet gourd, chilli, sweet potato, barley, soybean, sorghum, chewing varieties of sugarcane, sugar beet and coconut which are suitable for coastal areas and marine islands. Research is also needed to ensure not only greater yields but also to develop crops that have good nutritional quali-ties. Efforts are needed to develop gender-sensitive technology given the role of women in agriculture that can, for example, reduce their work load and free up their time for other household activities. Indeed, women’s empowerment is paramount under this programme given their potential role in agriculture. Organic farming along with the use of crop residues, compost, and animal waste, especially of horticultural crops, should be further developed and expanded for domestic but also export markets (see Programme V.1.2). Finding the underlying causes of, and possible solutions to, the yield gap is also needed. Investments will be required to strengthen the capacities and the infrastructure of the institu-tions that are to carry this research and develop technologies.

I.1.2. Develop technologies, including biotechnologies, and measures to adapt agricultural systems to climate change

Crops will need to be adapted to unfavourable ecosystems and climate-smart agricultural methods expanded to respond to the regional effects of climate change on food and nutrition security through climate-smart technology development, dissemination and adoption down to the farmer’s level. New


high-impact technologies, such as green biotechnology, biofortification, and nanotechnology including Green House Gas (GHG) emission reducing technology where appropriate, will be used to boost productivity and enhance the nutritional qualities of food in an eco-friendly manner. Partnerships with the private sector will be essential in this regard. Low water survivor crops will be promoted in drought-prone regions and stress-tolerant crop technology, such as flexible High Yielding Varieties (HYVs), developed. Trials will need to be conducted on the most vulnerable regions based on the priori-ties set in the National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) and the Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (BCCSAP). Emphasis should be placed on developing nutrient dense and resilient crops given the evolving climatic conditions and opportunities arising from this new context. Commercial cultivation of seaweed on coast lines is an example of nutrient dense sources that can be explored. Adjustments to crop-based agriculture will be based on recommendations from research that will focus on the most economically and climatically vulnerable areas of the country. For this, invest-ments in research infrastructure are needed.

I.1.3. Improve and expand nutrition-sensitive extension programmes and agricultural advisory services

Extension services draw their strength from research but also from farmers’ knowledge, innovations and feedback. The institutional mechanisms put in place to link research to extension -District Technical Committees (DTC), Regional Technical Committees (RTC), Agricultural Technical Committees (ATC) and National Agricultural Technical Coordination Committees (NATCC)- need to be revitalised and operationalised while the capacity of extension departments (DAE) and farmers’ organisations needs to be strengthened to allow the two-way transfer of knowledge. The creation of information hubs around the country and effective use of ICTs, with the establishment of a nationwide digitised agricultural database system should facilitate and accelerate information transfer to farmers. An ICT-based surveil-lance system can also assist farmers by detecting, diagnosing, preventing and controlling diseases. This can complement more traditional farmers’ training and demonstrations, field days and exhibitions. Climate change adaptation in crop sector, and early warning and vulnerability -Vulnerability Risk Assessment (VRA), Food Security Early Warning, Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) and Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping (VAM)- information, beneficiary awareness building and insti-tutional arrangement need to be strengthened for supply of relevant scientific information through extension services. It is also essential that women are explicitly targeted by extension services to unleash their potential in agriculture. For example, additional female extension workers can be recruited to ease communication to women farmers who constitute a large part of the farmer community. Efforts will be needed in promoting practices that test e.g. adaptive trials for direct seeded rice cultivars and all technology developed by National Agricultural Research System (NARS), and apply improved practic-es that will render agriculture more productive, resilient, diverse and sustainable such as the introduc-tion of new cropping patterns, crops, increased affordable mechanisation, or spread of contract-farming. Extension services hold an important role in sensitising farmers to the importance of agriculture in providing healthy diets by promoting the cultivation of nutrient-rich and diversified crops.

Important ongoing and pipeline investment operations

The Ministry of Agriculture plans to invest in strengthening environmental stress research for sustaina-ble crop production in the problem areas of Bangladesh through Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI). A major Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) project is also in the pipeline to strengthen diversified crop production by climate-smart agriculture system. Its main ongoing projects are the Rural Development and Co-operatives Division's (RDCD) ‘Expansion, Renovation and Mod-ernization of Bangabandhu Poverty Alleviation Training Complex’ in Gopalgonj and DAE’s ‘Year-Round Fruit Production for Nutrition Improvement Project’.

Additional considerations: The agricultural knowledge and information system in Bangladesh forms a complex web of actors from public, private and non-government institutions. There are, for instance,


12 government organisations falling under the purview of different ministries that act as agricultural extension service providers. A number of research institutes generate agricultural knowledge: NARS is composed of 13 research institutes. More coordination between these actors is required for greater efficiency and to ensure women and smallholders do not fall through the extension net as still happens often despite representing a large share of the agricultural sector. Additionally, this programme relies extensively on the enhancement of knowledge through research and improved technology which will require substantial resources, both human and infrastructural. However, grass root knowledge and expe-rience should also be used as an essential source of information that can help identify better practices adapted to the emerging challenges such as climate change. Agriculture Information and Communica-tion Centre (AICC) at village level and Farmer’s Information and Advisory Centre (FIAC) at union level could be established as a means of extension programme and agricultural advisory services.

Programme I.2. Improved access, quality and management of agricultural inputs, including water and land

Programme aggregate output: Farmers are able to access quality agricultural inputs more cheaply and readily and are able to manage their use more sustainably and efficiently.

Justification for this programme: The acute pressure that exists on natural resources in Bangladesh is exacerbated by the effects of climate change and demographic pressure which means more food needs to be produced with less. Access to enough quality agricultural inputs is therefore crucial to maximise production under the existing constraints. Not only is research key to developing more performing inputs, such as seeds and pesticides, but a Save and Grow approach which encourages eco-friendly practices needs to be developed and disseminated to preserve the quality of land and water needed for agriculture and build resilience to climate change.


I.2.1. Enhance availability and efficient use of affordable and quality inputs (seeds, fertilisers, pesticides) and credit for safe and diversified crops

Because most research and development (R&D) for seed production, multiplication, processing and preservation and testing occurs in the public sector, investments in this area are paramount. With regards to importation, multiplication and distribution of seeds, the right measures need to be put in place for fruitful collaborations with NGOs and the private sector that favour farmers, especially the most vulnerable ones. In conjunction with this, farmers’ own capacity to produce seeds should be devel-oped. Farmers’ groups, especially women farmers’ groups, should be involved in creating such condu-cive environment to ensure better access to seeds and other inputs. While quality and supply of inputs is improved, Precision Agriculture e.g. use of Urea Super Granules and Integrated Pest Management through biocontrol should be promoted to optimise input use and maximise returns while preserving resources and reducing environmental damage. The push needed for farmers to diversify their crops requires access to affordable credit.

I.2.2. Preserve agricultural land fertility and establish land rights of most vulnerable populations

While timely access to unadulterated fertilisers needs to be ensured, farmers must be trained to use fertilisers in a balanced way -basing dosages on soil tests carried out by well-equipped soil testing labo-ratories and with kits made available locally- to maintain soil fertility while supporting the production and widespread distribution of bio-fertilisers and mineral fertilisers which do not affect the quality of water. More generally, environmentally sound fertility management practices, such as the use of vermin compost, must be promoted to help sustain soil fertility. The use of fertilisers fortified in micronutrient should be part of the sensitisation by extension workers of farmers to the importance of nutrients in diets. Other practices that can help preserve soils should be expanded such as the use of certain vegeta-


tion and trees and the introduction of some crop rotation e.g. with legumes. Land needs to be protected from the increasing threat of erosion by appropriate river dredging initiatives. Detailed inventorying of land and soil resources based on soil surveys at union level would allow precision agricultural planning. Land zoning of the country needs to be completed to enable sustainable land and water (see Programme I.2.3.) use given the competing existing demands for these resources associated with rapid demographic and economic growth. The establishment of land rights especially for the most vulnerable groups, with special focus on women, can help create long-term incentives to preserve land fertility.

I.2.3. Improve water management through conservation, sustainable extraction and distribution of ground water and efficient use of surface water for irrigation

Regular updating of the National Water Resource Database to monitor groundwater levels, floods, drainage, salinity, and arsenic levels in the dry and monsoon seasons in Bangladesh is needed to be able to plan water usage and needs. As with other agricultural inputs, it is important to develop technologies and spread practices that can help save conserve water, such as the use of buried pipes, drip and sprin-kler irrigation, and the use of Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD). Given the extensive use of arsenic-contaminated groundwater to irrigate crops, it is urgent to develop the capacity to mitigate its adverse effects. A more cost-effective water distribution system needs to be put in place. Irrigation at night, discouraging the use of deep tube well for irrigation and the cultivation of high water demand crop in Barind Area could be incorporated as a means of improved water management. Surface water irrigation needs to be promoted to reduce pressure on ground water and circumvent the arsenic problem, through the expansion of irrigation infrastructures such as solar panels for small-scale irrigation. The creation of water reservoirs and the harvesting of rain water in rainfed/coastal/hilly areas should be encouraged, and small-scale water resources systems promoted with active participation of local com-munities to ensure proper maintenance of the infrastructure. Efforts are also needed to excavate/re-exca-vate the natural canals and other water bodies which can help small-scale surface water irrigation and control waterlogging. Complementary irrigation should be supplied to rain-fed T. Aman and Aus rice when required to minimise dependence on irrigation-dependant Boro rice. Water reservoir, canals and other water bodies have the potential to be used for multiple uses, including fish farming for increased production of animal source foods (see Programme I.3). PPPs are recognised as an effective way to overcome financial constraints in the development of irrigation and ventures to enable their develop-ment should be encouraged.

I.2.4. Mitigate the effects of saline water intrusion and its impact on food production and implica-tions for consumption

Large areas of crop land in coastal areas suffer from salinisation due to natural calamities driven by the effects of climate change. Presently, in compliance with the National Shrimp Policy 2014, eco-friendly integrated shrimp farming is being promoted, which will ultimately ensure the health of soil and water. Assessing the biodiversity changes that are likely to happen in this context need to be appropriately considered for policy responses. Solutions that can be put in place range from coastal afforestation to the development of saline-resistant rice varieties and climate-resilient crop varieties, planting of saline-tolerant fruit trees and using the water for farming of saline-tolerant fish species (see Programme I.3). Shrimp farming may be integrated in low-saline and non-saline areas with the adoption and intro-duction of salt-tolerant varieties following the Land Zoning Guidelines of the Government in the coastal areas. The numerous damaged polders built to provide protection against tidal intrusion and to increase agricultural production should be rehabilitated.


The pipeline budget of this programme is inflated by the planned setting up of a modern, energy efficient with higher capacity urea fertiliser factory to cost over US$ 1 billion with one quarter of the funds to come from DPs. Most substantial ongoing projects are related to irrigation and water management.


Additional considerations: Bangladesh is plagued with a number of problems due to geographical idiosyncrasies, such as declining aquifer levels, arsenic contamination, silting and increased salinity in coastal areas, drainage congestion due to rise in sea level, and river bed rise, which make implementa-tion of agricultural programmes all the more challenging. The success of this programme relies on the close collaboration between several ministries but particularly the Ministries of Agriculture, Industry and Water Resources. The involvement of farmer organisations and the private sector is also critical. A supportive policy environment that enables public private partnerships and enhances participation of private sector entrepreneurs is key in providing quality inputs and services. Input adulteration is also a continuous threat which Programme V.1. seeks to address.

Programme I.3. Enhanced productivity and sustainable production of animal source foods

Programme aggregate output: The production of foods from animal source is increased by boosting the productivity and profitability of fisheries, aquaculture, dairy, meat and eggs in a sustainable manner.

Justification for this programme: Inadequate growth in early childhood has been linked to poor dietary diversity, notably low intake of good quality protein and micronutrient-rich animal source foods. These foods play a crucial role in addressing chronic child malnutrition and related FNS issues given their intrinsic nutritional qualities but also because they substantially enhance the bioavailability of micronutrients from other foods22. In line with global trends, capture fisheries are threatened by the overall drastic shifts in agricultural production and management of land and water, more areas brought under high yielding rice varieties, expansion of irrigation, drainage and protection by flood control embankments and insecticide and pesticide excessive use. In addition, overfishing, destructive practices and pollution affect biomass and biodiversity. Fish farming has more than compensated for the sharp decline in consumption of naturally harvested fish to some extent, but the nutritive value of these usual-ly large farmed fish is low compared to the capture fisheries and small fish which are rich in sources of important micronutrients, including iron, zinc, calcium, vitamin A and vitamin B12, as well as essential fatty acids and animal protein. The production in livestock and poultry needs to be enhanced in relation to demand. The strong call for development of this sector came from government agencies, CSOs, private sector and farmers recognising the contribution of this sector to income and employment gener-ation, and food and nutrition security. Milk production is beleaguered with a multitude of problems such as lack of high yielding breeds, knowledge gaps of farmers, inadequate milk value chain, lack of adequate veterinary services and shortage of quality feeds and fodder. Other challenges are poor availa-bility of drugs, vaccines and artificial insemination facilities, poor husbandry practices and lack of labo-ratory facilities of Department of Livestock Services (DLS) at field levels.


I.3.1. Improve management of fisheries, livestock and poultry to increase production and produc-tivity and nutritional value while ensuring sustainability

I.3.1.1. Fisheries and aquaculture: In order to preserve the amount and diversity of capture fish, current rules and systems in place need to be implemented and reviewed: national and local governance of wetlands, fish and wetlands sanctuaries, connectivity between water bodies and wetlands, fish sanctuar-ies, fishing bans in critical areas during certain seasons, rules regarding the gear used and the species that can be fished, etc. The joint management of water resources by community-based organisations should be further encouraged drawing from recent positive experiences. Ensuring rights over water bodies for the most vulnerable, with special focus on women will contribute to sustainable fishing prac-tices. Farmers need to be educated through extension services on optimal management practices and supported to ensure that water bodies used as refuges and sanctuaries are protected, do not dry out and connectivity to wetlands is maintained. Economical ways to produce feed with high content in protein and micronutrients must be encouraged. Research must be promoted to ensure that efficient and sustain-able technologies and practices are adopted by farmers.

22This is also the case of foods rich in vitamin C.


I.3.1.2. Livestock and poultry: Breed development needs to be strengthened with the introduction of individual animal identification and recording systems. Establishment of good husbandry practices is also central to this process. Enhanced production of meat and poultry with special emphasis on beef fattening, small ruminants and broiler production are also high policy priorities that merit major invest-ment. Boosting milk production should also be a focus of attention while also ensuring that the milk value chain is strengthened to allow for efficient marketing of this commodity (see Programme II.1.). To complement the National Nutrition Services, poultry raising, and other community level nutri-tion-based agricultural activities should be revived by providing training to farmers and through behav-iour change communications (BCC), especially smallholders who can then supplement their diets. The promotion of smallholder dairy farming integrated with crop and fish culture is another avenue into effectively enhancing diets for nutrition. The creation of small-scale biogas farms can be encouraged as a way to enhance households’ income. For these changes to take place, advice will have to be provided through extension workers, notably door step and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) based service delivery.

I.3.2. Sustain micronutrient-rich animal food production through conserving fisheries and livestock biodiversity

I.3.2.1. Fisheries and aquaculture: Polyculture of large fish and highly nutritious small fish which increases total fish production as well as the nutritional quality of the production must be promoted and scaled up. The large fish are sold, thereby increasing household income, whereas, part of the small fish is used for household consumption, supplying good quality protein, fatty acids and multiple micronutri-ents. Total fish production and diversity of species can be greatly enhanced by making use of a continu-um of production systems, for example, ponds connected to rice fields for part of the production cycle and use of seasonal water bodies for fish farming. The human and physical capacities of government departments and other institutions that contribute to the preservation and improvement of diverse fish species, including farmed species and production of good quality brood stock, fish fingerlings, technol-ogy development through extensive research and provide extension services must be strengthened.

I.3.2.2. Livestock and poultry: Strengthening productivity of dairy animals through genetic improve-ment is a major priority. Genetic improvement of local genomes along with conservation and utilisation of indigenous breeds with proven potential needs to be scaled up. An autonomous institution should be established for quality assurance and certification of livestock products, vaccines and biologics. Artifi-cial insemination services need to be further strengthened and expanded, as appropriate. Genetic improvement of poultry, goat, sheep, cattle and buffalo and breed development needs to be made possi-ble by strengthening research and development capacity and upgraded postgraduate training.

I.3.3. Strengthen sustainable shrimp aquaculture, marine fisheries and farming systems adapted to geographical zones

Despite significant improvements, concerns remain in quality assurance in shrimp aquaculture and laboratory testing capacities must be enhanced by procuring equipment and trained manpower. The Government must facilitate the introduction of Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) shrimp by the private sector. Community organisations of shrimp farmers and marine fishermen should also be supported with technology, input, financing and market linkages to stimulate production. Marine and coastal resources will have to be protected from overfishing to safeguard their sustainability while allowing the poorer sections of the population to tap into this source of food and income. Where water salinity has become an issue, brackish water fish and shell fish culture should be promoted to minimise the negative effects of this problem on nutritional outcomes of coastal populations.

I.3.4. Improve fisheries, livestock and poultry health services, quality inputs and surveillance

Public private partnerships should be promoted to allow for greater availability and enhancement for


safer and quality inputs for all sectors -quality and healthy feed, day old chicks, breeds and medi-cine/vaccination-. By developing community-based fodder cultivation along roads and highways, rivers and embankments, in khas lands and in combination with crops, the production of food and fodder would need to be expanded. Efficient supply of inputs like day old chicks, vaccines against emerging diseases, semen and other related materials need to be enhanced. Development and implementation of hatchery regulations, introduction of new layer strains and development of Parent and Grand Parent breeds need to be improved. Additionally, mechanised and climate resilient environment friendly production practices must be promoted. Multifaceted veterinary service delivery system needs improvement. This will also require strengthening of veterinary diseases diagnostic laboratory facilities along with surveillance and monitoring. Diagnoses through animal health services need to be improved and access to drugs will have to be expanded. Field level surveillance systems need to be improved to mitigate disease outbreak, especially Avian Influenza and related veterinary diseases. Research on the prevention and control of microbes in aquaculture will need to continue, especially in light of emerging drug resistance.


The two biggest ongoing projects are the Department of Fisheries’ ‘Enhancement of Fish Production through Restoration of Water bodies Project’ and the Department of Livestock Services'‘Establishment of Institute of Livestock Science and Technology’, both of which are categorised as nutrition-sensitive projects. The Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock's (MoFL) ‘Sustainable Coastal and Marine Fisheries in Bangladesh’ pipeline project is the most substantial in this programme followed by the portion of the ‘Livestock Development based Dairy and Meat Production Project (LDDMPP)’ allocated to this programme23 .

Additional considerations: Collaboration between the Ministry of Agriculture and Ministry of Fisher-ies and Livestock is essential. An enabling policy environment and policy will be needed for promotion of public private partnerships and enhanced participation of private sector entrepreneurs. Access rights over land and water bodies are essential for the most vulnerable and needs to be addressed.

23 As explained in Section 11, some projects fall under several CIP2 programmes. In such cases, only the corresponding shares of their budgets are allocated to each programme.


OUTCOME II. Efficient and nutrition-sensitive post-harvest transformation and value addition

Programme II.1. Strengthened post-harvest value chain with particular focus on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) (storage, processing, branding, labelling, marketing and trade)

Expected programme aggregate output: Food value chains are developed and strengthened, contrib-uting to better access to safe and nutritious food and increased rural incomes through the creation of employment.

Justification for this programme: How food is processed and handled after the production phase is crucial to its final nutritional value. From the post-harvest handling and storage, processing, transporta-tion, marketing, trade, retail and promoting consumption and disposing of food- all stages can compro-mise or maximise the nutritional value a food item can offer. The potential income source that these value addition activities can constitute, especially for women and the poorest sections of the population, also needs to be exploited. Supply chain development for animal products should provide better prices to producers. Unorganised animal products marketing system need to be restructured, developing well defined marketing channel linking producers to consumers through private processors.


II.1.1. Develop skills and strengthen capacity to process and supply safe and nutrient-rich foods with emphasis on quality standards and nutrient labelling information

Better understanding of different food value chains through research is needed to better target invest-ments in this area. Research can identify profitable areas of food processing that can guide food produc-ers and agribusinesses and inform policy. Capacity strengthening for agro-processing entrepreneurs or those aspiring to join the sector is needed for this industry to develop: from the actual food processing techniques to managerial and business skills. Food producers can also benefit from developing their marketing skills, including product branding and nutrient labelling. Their technical abilities to process food in a way that yields foods with profitable margins must also be developed while ensuring the safety of food and nutritious value of these foods. This knowledge must also be imparted at individual and household levels. Tailored training can provide the most vulnerable groups the skills they need to be employable in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). The identification of skills required for local communities to be employable should be done in collaboration with the local private sector and NGOs. In addition to training, affordable credit is paramount to enable the development of SMEs. Employment and income generation programmes can be a way to introduce vulnerable groups to the food processing industry and by the same token ensure their access to varied and nutritious foods. Emphasis should be put on developing cottage industries that involves women and accommodates around their household obligations such as child care. Maternity protection at work needs to be ensured to safeguard the health of pregnant and nursing women and prevent vulnerable women from losing their jobs because of mater-nity.

II.1.2. Adopt appropriate technology and strengthen infrastructure to allow quality improve-ment, value addition, and fortification of foods

Under this sub-programme, transmission of knowledge on practices that can enhance the nutritional value of food is essential be it at the time when food is being transported, processed but also prepared. For example, germinating and malting of grains and pulses will enhance their vitamin, mineral and protein content and bioavailability whereas a prolonged exposure to heat reduces the vitamin content. For the latter, infrastructure development may be required to enable households, small and bigger farm-ers to store their produce in an appropriate manner. Attention is needed for disaster-prone areas and locations mostly likely to be affected by climate change where produce may be more easily damaged by


the climatic vagaries: ‘climate-smart’ food systems must be developed. Projects that support the devel-opment of agribusinesses that prevent food-borne illness -with the dissemination of Good Hygienic Practices as covered under Programme V.1.- and extend shelf-life ensuring year-round good nutrition and income such as freezing, fermentation, pickling, canning and pasteurisation should be favoured, tapping the potential for development of youth and women entrepreneurship (Sub-programme II.1.1.). The introduction of appropriate post-harvest technology such as small pounding and de-husking machines can relieve rural women from time-consuming tasks. Improved nutritional quality of foods also means avoiding the use or over-use of certain ingredients such as salt, trans fats, sugar and addi-tives. Plans to collaborate with the food industry to achieve such results need to be made. The 2016 Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture recommended maintaining nutrition consid-eration across the value chain, whilst removing anti-nutritional factors from products such as reduction of beta -N- oxalyl-amino -L -alanine (BOAA) content in khesari dal and erucic acid in mustard oil. Food fortification will need to be continued and scope for widening the types of food to be fortified will merit policy attention. Indeed, biofortification and HYVs need to be considered as important measures to better target the 1000 days window of opportunity for nutrition.

II.1.3. Mobilise and promote producer and marketing groups for improved market access and bargaining power, especially for women and smallholders

In a country where the agricultural sector is dominated by small enterprises, encouraging the creation of producers’ -especially small to marginal ones, and women- and marketing cooperatives is highly desirable if the processing industry is to be promoted. Food value chains can also benefit from being shortened by reducing the number of intermediaries between producers and retailers. Collectively, farmers and those involved in processing food can invest in improving market facilities and storage; their access to resources and technology is enhanced which can improve their productivity; they have better access to markets with greater bargaining power vis-à-vis buyers, leading to more remunerative prices for their produce; the effects of risks and disasters are mitigated and they are also able to take more risks such as turning to new more diverse crops which they would not otherwise. For the milk supply chain, such initiatives have proved very successful and this should be further expanded. This can highly benefit marine fishers for example, who lack of cooling facilities, and are forced to sell their catch immediately to middlemen at low prices or incur major wastage. Cost-sharing projects can change this to organise fish procurement centres and fish collection points which would be linked to domestic and international markets. Farmers’ cooperatives and groups e.g. for milk production need to be estab-lished to convert them into profit-oriented groups. Market supply chains should be shortened so that unnecessary intermediaries are excluded. Good and certified quality of products should efficiently flow through markets.


This programme counts much fewer interventions, all of which are categorised as nutrition-supportive rather than sensitive. The two main ongoing ones are DAE’s ‘Integrated Farm Management, Agricultur-al Production and Employment Programme’ and Milk Vita’s ‘Establishment of Super Instant Powder Milk Plant at Baghabarighat, Sirajgonj’. In terms of pipeline, the projects that stand out in terms of potential investments include the Department of Fisheries’ ‘Sustainable Management and Value Chain Development in Fisheries Sector’ and the DLS’ ‘Livestock Development based Dairy Revolution and Meat Production Project (LDDRMPP)’.

Additional considerations: Because the value chain involves many actors and stakeholders, develop-ing a nutrition-sensitive value chain requires substantial efforts in terms of coordination, especially among different ministries and line agencies involved and the private sector. Efforts will be needed to provide credit to marginal and small entrepreneurs if MSMEs are to be promoted in the food sector. Another major challenge will be to convince the private sector to adhere to the highest standards of nutritional quality, nutrient labelling and food safety where there is already a strong demand for their current products.


Programme II.2. Improved physical access to markets, facilities and information

Expected programme aggregate output: Food producers and processors are able to use markets more efficiently.

Justification for this programme: Inefficiencies in the value addition chain, such as market distortions through intermediaries and limited market infrastructure, can affect the variability of prices and trans-late into lower profits for growers: vegetable growers only receive 48% of the retail price against 79% for rice growers. By removing some of the barriers to agribusiness, agro-processing and supply chains, this programme aims to provide the ‘big push’ needed by agriculture and rural development.


II.2.1. Improve market infrastructures, physical access to market facilities

The maintenance and further building of link and feeder roads that connect local markets remains essen-tial to allow the prompt transportation of fresh produce -and avoid spoilage. Market infrastructure also needs to be expanded: for instance, fish landing sites, harbour-based fish dressing centres and fish processing estates, as well as modern slaughter houses and live poultry marketing facilities. The further development of cold chain infrastructure remains high on the agenda and should be undertaken in close collaboration with the private sector. Fish, for example, takes between one and three days to reach markets from their landing point and 30% are marketed fresh and 40% frozen. For this commodity, a failing cold chain signifies spoilage. Hence, where the food chain is involved, adequate measures must be put in place such as the guarantee of a continuous supply of electricity.

II.2.2. Enhance the role of the private sector and promote Public Private Partnership (PPP) investments through adequate public sector regulatory frameworks and Technical Assistance (TA) support

Two recent papers in the Lancet24 highlight the potential role of the private sector in combating undernu-trition. Because agri-food firms will inevitably affect nutritional outcomes given their role in providing food to the consumers, it is important to create an enabling environment for the private sector to contrib-ute to food value chain development that responds to the needs of the country. For example, transparent and inclusive policy frameworks that help manage the potential risks and trade-offs between private economic objectives and public goals such as the healthy nutritional value of food stuffs (see Sub-pro-gramme II.1.2.) can be devised. Private companies can also be encouraged to contribute to developing the food value chain with measures such as the reduction of financial and regulatory constraints. Private investment may be further leveraged though PPPs which can be encouraged through enabling public sector regulatory frameworks and the provision of technical support for their development and monitor-ing for example. The creation of Agro Economic Zones, like the existing Export Processing Zones (EPZs) could also help stimulate rapid economic growth of the food processing industry by setting up special areas where potential investors would find a conducive investment climate. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN) can try to leverage significant amounts of private investment and direct it toward improving the nutrition of low-income families. Efforts will also need to be mobilised through the SUN Business Network in support of the SUN Movement.

II.2.3. Scale-up information dissemination, including the establishment of ICT facilities

Market participants need to be provided with adequate market information to ensure that buying and selling is made competitive. Continuous market research will inform efficient market operations. Beyond physical access to markets (Sub-programme II.2.1.), market information systems need to be developed notably using ICTs, so that poorer and vulnerable sections of the population are able to derive financial benefits by expanding their access to markets, in the same way their richer counterparts do. Mobile phones and the internet can facilitate market access and reduce transaction costs. They can

24Gillespie, S., Haddad, L., Mannar, V., Menon, P., Nisbett (2013) The Lancet: The politics of reducing malnutrition: building commitmentand accelerating progress and Ruel, M.T. and H. Alderman (2013) Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help toaccelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition?


provide information on fair market value of goods and other important knowledge to small farmers and producers. This can drive consumer prices down and promote quality of the goods sold due to enhanced competition between food producers. This enhanced access to information through ICTs to connect more efficiently to markets is a particularly useful tool for women who tend to be more restricted in their movements. Coping with domestic food price fluctuations is another high policy priority. There is need to understand the proper functioning of food commodity markets and the sources of food price volatility given its implications for food insecure households.


The majority of projects under this programme, both ongoing and pipeline consist in building roads and bridges. This can only be considered as nutrition-supportive interventions, although they are paramount in developing economies and allowing access to markets. Because of this categorisation, only half of their budget is considered in the nutrition-weighed CIP2 budget; but these are costly endeavours, and in spite of this, they still weigh heavily in the overall CIP2 budget. DLS is currently finalising the LDDRMPP.

Additional considerations: The presence of trade syndicates can jeopardise the proper functioning of markets, by interfering with the role of prices as market signals. This is a challenging problem to solve. With regards to using ICTs, limited literacy can constitute an obstacle, especially for the poorest sections of the population who may have benefited from minimum levels of schooling.


OUTCOME III. Improved dietary diversity, consumption and utilisation

Programme III.1. Enhanced nutrition knowledge, promotion of good practices, and consumption of safe and nutritious diets

Expected programme aggregate output: Nutrition and health are improved through integrated short and long-term interventions.

Justification for this programme: Households have slowly been changing their diets and are consum-ing a broader range of foods, with greater consumption of vegetables, fruits, and animal source foods. However, the consumption rate of these foods remains below the recommended amounts. Food consumption remains heavily centred on cereals, with rice alone providing around 60 to 66% of dietary energy intake. It is therefore crucial to continue promoting diversified and quality diets through programmes based on accurate knowledge of what people are consuming and what influences the changes in their diets. Faced with the appearance of foods not traditionally consumed in Bangladesh on the markets and the influence of globalisation on diets, more than ever, people need to be informed on what an adequate diet is. Finally, these more long-term strategies must be linked to ones that can tackle some of the immediate problems.


III.1.1. Scale up nutrition training, behaviour change communications (BCC) for enhanced knowledge, safe storage, household processing and improved consumption

Availability and access to nutritious food does not guarantee that people will consume adequate diets. Consumers need to be informed on the importance of a diverse and balanced diet which includes animal source foods, with messages adapted to different audiences e.g. rural and urban through BCC. The Food Composition Tables and dietary guidelines should be widely disseminated, used in food planning and regularly updated. Women should be targeted by these campaigns since they hold a key role in the preparation and intra-household distribution of food and feeding their families. Demonstrations of the best methods to improve nutrition through low-cost food preparation that uses local nutritious foods and appropriate storage should take place as widely as possible. Sensitisation to the importance of the nutri-tion received by a child in the 1000 days since conception is also paramount as well as the promotion of optimal Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) practices, exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months and appropriate complementary feeding from 6 to 24 months. Sensitisation of children through school vege-table gardens, cooking demonstrations and nutrition education should be incorporated in the curricu-lum. Building the capacities of health workers and teachers to mainstream nutrition in their messages to women and children is a prerequisite for these activities to take place. Where appropriate, the consump-tion of fortified foods will be advised.

III.1.2. Prevent and control non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and ensure healthy diets through promotion of dietary guidelines linked with national NCD strategies and related nutrition services

Changes in diets are not explained only by changes in purchasing power: many other factors come into play which need to be understood to steer people towards healthy diets and lifestyles. The food culture will evolve as the country transitions to the status of middle-income country, changing according to the supply available but also through the influence of external markets and media. Trade and trade policies can promote better nutrition, but can also have negative nutritional outcomes. Freer trade broadens food choice, thus promoting a more diversified diet, but at the same time, it is associated with increased availability of cheaper foods that may be characterised by high calorie and low nutritional content, which can lead to an increased incidence of obesity and other diet-related diseases. In the context of urbanisation and increased market reliance in Bangladesh, trade must be observed through a nutrition lens to maximise benefits and reduce risks. It is important to scale up the implementation of national dietary guidelines through the National Nutrition Services (NNS) and the NCD strategy adjusting


dietary and nutrient requirements as per age, activity levels, and occupation. Mass-scale consumer information, BCC and public awareness campaigns need to be designed and integrated into health and food-based interventions to encourage consumption of healthy and nutritious foods and discourage/lim-it the consumption of highly processed sugar-rich, high fat and salty products. In particular, nutri-tion-sensitive price interventions may impose taxes on ultra-processed foods e.g. sugar-sweetened drinks so as to restrict their consumption. Preventive and control strategies should be popularised through dissemination of diet and nutrition information, including nutrient labelling, through digitised technology, visual and folk media at strategic points: hospitals, clinics, schools, universities, corporate offices, community clinics, extension centres and rural communities at large. Public parks and walk ways should provide facilities for physical activity as appropriate.

III.1.3. Knowledge-based tools and research on the development and promotion of nutrient dense recipes using local foods for enhancing diversified food consumption to reduce stunting, wasting and micronutrient deficiencies

The Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture held in Dhaka in April 2016 emphasised that agricultural diversity can increase dietary diversity. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions are long-term interventions, systematically targeted to reduce undernutrition rates i.e. stunting, wasting and anemia and may be mobilised to prevent overnutrition, obesity and NCDs. The Symposium highlighted that agriculture must be based on sensitivity to human nutritional needs to address them. To this effect, improving nutrition through increased production and productivity of livestock, dairy, poultry and fisheries and strengthening linkages with enhanced consumption of animal source foods can play a central role in preventing and controlling stunting, wasting and micronutrient deficiencies, notably anemia, vitamin A and zinc deficiencies. Given the importance of appropriate feeding, especially of infants and young children as well as healthy diets during pregnancy and lactation, the work to develop nutrient dense recipes that has been carried out and promoted through the field training delivered by, among others, Bangladesh Breastfeeding Foundation (BBF), Bangladesh Institute of Research and Training on Applied Nutrition (BIRTAN), DAE, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC), BARI, Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation for Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (BIRDEM), DLS, Department of Fisheries (DoF) needs to continue. These recipes must be based on the Food Composition Tables. The promotion of these recipes must not limit itself to only poorer sections of the population since studies have found that even among the richest wealth quintile, 65% of children do not receive an adequate diet 25.

Important ongoing and pipeline investment operations Only BIRTAN’s ‘Integrated Agricultural Approach for Ensuring Nutrition and Food Security Project (BIRTAN phase)’ and the Local Government Engineering Department’s (LGED) ‘Support to Urban Health and Nutrition to Bangladesh’ are ongoing under this programme. A subcomponent of a pipeline project, i.e. LDDRMPP, envisages capacity building across the livestock and dairy value chain, enhanc-ing consumer awareness and nutrition through behavioural change communication campaigns, safe animal source foods handling and preparation, nutritional aspects of milk-meat and its products and improving the diets of school children through milk and eggs incorporated in school nutrition programmes. Another component of a pipeline project on smallholder agricultural competitiveness focuses on improving diets, nutrition and product development for vulnerable smallholder groups and families, among other activities related to the horticulture value chain. Most other planned projects that have been included are part of the NNS.

Additional considerations: This programme involves many stakeholders and it is essential that actions are coordinated for a common approach. It should seek synergies with the NPAN2 and mechanisms such as SUN -with strategic focus on the first 1000 days of life- and REACH. Where the medium to long-term effects of the initiatives proposed in this programme need to be complemented by immediate treatment of acute malnutrition, therapeutic and supplementary feeding measures for pregnant women and malnourished children should be put in place as appropriate. The promotion of fortified foods should not contravene the Breast-Milk Substitutes, Infant Foods, Commercially Manufactured Comple-mentary Foods and the Accessories Thereof (Regulation of Marketing) Act 2013.

25Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014.


Programme III.2. Optimised food utilisation through provision of safe water, improved food hygiene and sanitation

Expected programme aggregate output: Measures are taken to optimise the use of the nutritional potential of food.

Justification for this programme: Many people remain unaware of how the use of unsafe water and poor hygiene can lead to illnesses that affect their body’s utilisation of food. Many still lack access to adequate sanitary facilities. Half of the drinking water available fails to meet safety standards. The qual-ity of surface water has degraded due to improper discharge of industrial waste and other pollutants, such as herbicides, thus limiting its use as a drinking water source. Awareness-raising and education are urgently needed, while ensuring that the facilities needed for safe practices are in place.

III.2.1. Scale up the supply of safe water for consumption and domestic use

Clean and safe -from arsenic for example- water must be accessible to all for consumption but also other domestic uses. Where ground water is marred by the presence of arsenic, salt and other pollutants and surface water by the presence of micro-organisms, industrial wastes, fertilisers, insecticides or herbi-cides, alternative water supply options need to be developed. The number of pumps must be expanded, especially during the monsoon as contamination can happen. The impact of the shortage of drinking water is borne disproportionately by women who are traditionally charged with water collection.

III.2.2. Ensure hygienic food handling, preparation and services, and scale-up hand washing behaviour

Those involved in handling and preparing food, be it at home, in restaurants and on the streets, can transmit bacteria that may lead to illness. Humans, through their hands, breath, hair, and perspiration can constitute a source of contamination. This is why specific campaigns to inform on the dangers of unhygienic food handling, preparation, safe storage, reheating of foods where necessary, and distribu-tion and demonstration of appropriate practices is essential. Mothers should be sensitised to the need to wash their hands before preparing food for children and feeding them in addition to the use of correct cooking temperatures, protective display of foods and service. Ensuring that soap and water are availa-ble at all times close to food preparation and feeding areas and the use of low cost hand-washing technologies should be a priority.

III.2.3. Improve sanitary facilities and practices, including the prevention of animal cross-con-tamination, for reducing diarrheal disease and food borne illness and child undernutrition

A vicious cycle exists between diarrhea and undernutrition. People must be sensitised to the impact of water-borne diseases and poor hygiene on their body’s ability to optimally utilise the food they ingest. Sanitation infrastructure must be made widely available by building more sanitary latrines and scaling up its use as well as maintenance. Efforts are needed in particular in urban areas where only 25% of households live in dwellings with a permanent sanitary structure. Different gender needs must be taken into account e.g. in schools and facilities must be built bearing in mind the possible effects of floods. Animal cross-contamination in homesteads is also an issue of concern for which awareness raising activities need to be integrated into nutrition, food safety and sanitation projects.


The Department of Public Health Engineering (DPHE)’s ‘Bangladesh Rural Water Supply and Sanita-tion Project (BRWSSP)’ accounts for the biggest portion of the ongoing projects’ budget under this programme. Only five projects have been counted as currently ongoing under this programme and two in the pipeline.


Additional considerations: Synergies may be exploited between the actions proposed towards the sensitisation to the risks of cross-contamination and to the importance of consuming safe foods (Sub-programme V.1.4.). The improvement of sanitary facilities goes beyond the construction of latrines and requires infrastructure investments beyond the remit of the CIP2. Indeed, most of the urban residents do not have any connection to a public sewerage system but are connected simply to a septic tank. Yet, improper sanitation system and untreated sewage risks mixing with water. Furthermore, inad-equately sealed latrines in rural areas create faecal pollution at times of flooding.


OUTCOME IV. Enhanced access to social protection and safety nets and increased resilience

Programme IV.1.: Timely and effective disaster preparedness and responses through emergency food distribution, steps towards agricultural sector rehabilitation and mitigation measures

Expected programme aggregate output: Systems are in place to protect vulnerable groups' food and nutrition security before, during and after disasters.

Justification for this programme: Given the ever-increasing frequency of disasters and effects of climate change on FNS in Bangladesh, the country needs to integrate these factors in its planning. For example, crops, fish and livestock that are resilient to disasters but also hold high nutritive value must be preferred by vulnerable groups; quick-response measures must be put in place for agriculture to spring back in case of a disaster; and alternative income generating activities must exist for those whose livelihood is affected. When economic access to food is jeopardised by disasters, an efficient Public Food Distribution System (PFDS) needs to be ready to intervene.


IV.1.1. Increase the resilience of agricultural systems, including the production of disaster-resil-ient nutritious crops especially by vulnerable populations

The promotion of homestead-based agriculture, poultry, fish culture, livestock farming, roof top gardening, forest nursery and horticulture through projects, such as ‘Ekti Bari Ekti Khamar’, has been shown to increase and ensure year-round availability and intake of micronutrient-rich foods and animal source foods. This strengthens households’ resilience and should therefore be expanded with particular emphasis on producing disaster resilient crops with high nutrient content as identified or developed through research (see Sub-programme I.1.1.). Access to agricultural inputs -land, seeds, fish brood stock, fingerlings, water, fertilisers-, including credit and other financial services such as insurance schemes for women, smallholders and the rural poor, should be facilitated to increase their resilience. Targeted interventions should be put in place following natural disasters to fast-track the public and private distribution of seeds/seedlings and other agricultural inputs as well as cash or in-kind transfers to the most vulnerable households. By ensuring food can quickly be grown for self-consumption and by restoring their livelihoods, the impact of the crisis on their nutritional status can be minimised. An effec-tive early warning system will be developed in line with the Bangladesh Environment, Forestry and Climate Change Country Investment Plan (2016-2021)26. Such a system that will enable timely respons-es to sudden food needs of groups living in the areas prone to disasters (see Sub-programme IV.2.1.). The Government will ensure prompt reactions by operationalising its Multiple Risk Vulnerability Assessment Mapping (MRVA) cell and Damage and Needs Assessment Cell. Such measures could help guide farmers on which types of crops to sow and timings to adopt.

IV.1.2. Ensure social and economic access to food for the poorest sections of the population in times of crisis and in areas most affected by disaster

Efforts are needed to develop alternative income generating activities (AIGAs) in cases such as that of fishermen during the lean season, for groups that depend on the utilisation of natural resources that are being overexploited e.g. forests or for those unable to cope with the unpredictability of climatic events. Special programmes are needed for groups whose incomes are seasonal if no alternative livelihood is available during the restriction period of fish catching but also for those that are temporarily affected by crises or hit by climate change. Mobile phones must be used to transfer social benefits to the most vulnerable to avoid delays during or following disasters. For those with unreliable or no access to mobile phones, Union Digital Centres may be used.

26 Outcome 3 of this CIP is to implement climate change adaptation and mitigation measures and increase resilience.


IV.1.3. Scale-up modern food storage facilities for improved Public Food Distribution System, particularly in disaster-prone areas

The GoB’s storage capacity needs to be enhanced to be able to keep buffer stocks of food grain to make up for production and stock losses due to calamities. This requires construction of modern food grain storage facilities and appropriate maintenance of existing go-downs and silos. By ensuring the existence of appropriate storage facilities across the country and in disaster-prone areas, the GoB can keep large quantities of food grains for long periods of time to respond to ad hoc needs, with minimal losses and without compromising the nutritional value of the grain that is distributed. Cash and food transfers need to be made more flexible to allow a more efficient food grain stock management, to avoid spoilage when food stocks are not required for emergencies. Concurrently, household-based stocking will be encouraged (see Sub-Programme III.1.1.). Capacity strengthening efforts are also needed to ensure efficient stock information and appropriate distribution management. For example, an ICT-based PFDS will be introduced. This will also enhance the effectiveness of PFDS in its role in price stabilisation. The GoB should investigate the possibility of introducing nutrient-rich foods, such as pulses and animal source foods, for example, dried fish, in the PFDS.


The Ministry of Food’s ‘Modern Food Storage Facilities Project (MFSP)’ stands out among the ongoing projects. Many others are related to the management of areas at risk of flooding or erosion. There is little in the way of pipeline apart from the NNS Emergency supplies programme which has been included under this programme.

Additional considerations: The GoB faces the permanent challenge of having to reconcile the three objectives of the PFDS which simultaneously aims to: (i) support social safety nets; (ii) meet food and nutrition security needs arising from disasters; and (iii) stabilise food grain prices. An additional layer of complexity is now added by the recent NSSS’ plans to gradually shift from food-based to cash-based programmes. It is important that the initiatives to enhance the PFDS under the CIP2 and the NSSS are synchronised. With regards to funds made available to respond to disasters, Bangladesh’s progress to lower middle-income status is likely to be associated with lower TA commitments from international sources. This further stresses the need for support measures that will have long-lasting positive effects on resilience.

Programme IV.2. Strengthened social protection and safety net programmes for targeted groups across the life cycle, including disabled and displaced populations

Expected programme aggregate output: Effectiveness, targeting and content of social safety net programmes are improved to provide better protection to different vulnerable groups.

Justification for this programme: Existing safety nets bypass some of the most vulnerable people. Children under five for example, the elderly and people with disabilities, are often left out. Other groups are better covered, such as school age children, but targeting mechanisms remain weak: inclusion errors i.e. non-poor beneficiary households and exclusion errors i.e. poor non-beneficiary households are high, and transfers are low in value, irregular and bring limited relief and impact. Some geographical areas also need improved coverage especially as the effects of climate change take their toll on people’s liveli-hoods. A national single social registry is planned to be established for the better targeting and capturing of potential beneficiaries. This registry then will be connected to each ministry’s information manage-ment system to monitor the progress of the NSSS. The effect of safety nets on the nutritional status can also be improved through the fortification of the foods distributed and a greater diversity of foods distributed, as well as integrating nutrition education and awareness raising in the programme. These safety net programmes can also be used as a medium to raise awareness on the importance of eating nutritious, balanced and safe diets with the most vulnerable sections of the population.



IV.2.1. Expand and strengthen safety net programmes across the life cycle supporting vulnerable groups, such as poor women, children, the elderly, disabled people and displaced populations

Further progress needs to be made on targeting -especially of women, adolescent girls, children and the elderly- and on the efficiency and effectiveness of safety net programmes. The life cycle approach adopted by the NSSS 2015 can be applied to plan CIP2 investments required to meet the needs of people at different stages of their life. Preventive programmes will be required for unborn children and their mothers into their childhood to prevent unrepairable nutritional deficiencies from occurring. Older people as well as disabled ones will need protective safety nets to ensure their dietary needs are met. Given that the transfer value of the Old Age Allowance and Disability Benefit forms a minimal propor-tion of the allowances under the NSSS, review of the current schemes for its impact on nutrition and income security of the elderly and handicapped is a priority.

IV.2.2. Expand and strengthen programmes for supporting people living in vulnerable and disad-vantaged areas (char land, river bank, haors, hill tracts and urban areas)

The social security system needs to work in conjunction with an effective disaster response system for most vulnerable areas of the country. Delivery systems also require efficient information systems to manage resources and trained personnel. Synergies between programmes should be fully exploited. For example, food or cash for work projects should concentrate on building productive infrastructure such as irrigation, rural transport and markets. Potential beneficiaries must be made aware of the existence of Social Safety Nets (SSNs). Coverage of SSN must be expanded to include the poor, vulnerable and socially excluded residents of urban areas which are ever-growing due to migration to the cities by those looking for new economic opportunities and by those that have lost their land due to environmental disasters. Safety nets need to work in conjunction with an effective preparedness and disaster response system for most vulnerable areas of the country which includes an effective early warning system that will enable timely responses to sudden food needs due to disasters (see Sub-programme IV.1.1.).

IV.2.3. Introduce nutrition-sensitive social safety net programmes (SSNP), including food fortifi-cation, especially for mothers and children

Social protection is one of the key strategies to tackle malnutrition. However, cash or in-kind transfer itself does not have direct impacts over better nutrition outcomes. While the food safety net coverage is important to ensure that all vulnerable groups, especially those nutritionally vulnerable, receive adequate food, it should also be regarded as an opportunity to fully secure nutrient needs. For example, the micronutrient-fortified rice that is distributed to vulnerable targeted groups through the Vulnerable Group Development (VGD)27 and Vulnerable Group Feeding (VGF) or sold at a subsidised price through Open Market Sales (OMS) should be scaled up. Other forms of nutrient supplementation or/and food enrichment may be investigated and foods other than grain with high nutrient content could be distributed such as dried fish, fish powder or pulses. Use of potatoes to diversify diets and as a cereal substitute is also being explored, given its ability to blend well with cereals, lentils and other foods in preparations. It will also help to enhance the energy value of diets and reduce the dependence on rice. Cash transfer with conditionality on participation in health or nutrition education programmes or no conditional cash or in-kind transfer combining nutrition education can maximise potential changes in the purchase and consumption of specific selected foods. Regular, predictable and sustainable financing for SSNP should also be ensured. In order for the SSNP to be more nutrition-sensitive, it should seek to reach the nutritionally vulnerable, incorporate explicit nutrition objectives and indicators and promote strategies that enable households to access healthy and sustainable diets as well as health care. School feeding programmes will be expanded and used as a medium to foster good food habits and healthy dietary practices among children.

27MoWCA supported by WFP tested the distribution of fortified rice together with training and cash grants for investment to VGD women. Since the result of this pilot was positive, more than USD 1 million have been allocated by MoWCA to distrib-ute fortified rice in 35 upazilas covered by the VGD programme in 2017/18.


The Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection held in Dhaka in December 2017 concluded that taking nutrition-sensitive approaches in social protection programmes can accelerate the reduction of malnutrition in Bangladesh and contribute to achieving SDG2 “End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture”. For instance, a social transfer combined with a high-quality behaviour change communication was proved to be an effective method-ology to reduce stunting.

The Symposium also recommended: (i) targeting nutritionally vulnerable groups, such as 0-4 years old children, adolescents, pregnant women, lactating mothers, as well as those in urban areas because the current SSNs cover only 9 percent of the urban population, while the rural SSNs’ coverage is 30 percent; (ii) having nutrition objectives and related indicators explicitly in all programmes and projects of the concerned ministries and organisations and thereby monitoring progress and impacts on nutrition more effectively; and (iii) improving the quality of public services, mainly health services, that are linked closely with nutrition outcomes but are far inadequate to meet the need of target populations. The implementation of these recommendations requires inter-sectoral efforts by various stakeholders.


Twenty projects are ongoing in this category, including Directorate of Primary Education’s (DPE) School Feeding programme. The two main pipeline projects in terms of financial needs belong to the Department of Cooperatives and are the ‘Livelihood improvement of disadvantaged women by rearing cows’ and ‘Livelihood improvement of the disadvantaged women’.

Additional considerations: The GoB is planning to gradually switch its food-based programmes to cash-based ones, using the financial sector based G2P (Government to Person) system. This means that awareness raising on what adequate diets are will become paramount since the opportunity that food-based programmes currently provide to enhance vulnerable people’s diets will disappear. The GoB will need to ensure that the recommended diets are affordable by those at the lower end of the wealth scale. The distribution of fortified foods should not contravene the Breast-Milk Substitutes, Infant Foods, Commercially Manufactured Complementary Foods and the Accessories Thereof (Regulation of Marketing) Act 2013 which aims to ensure that breast milk and homemade nutritious foods are preferred to any manufactured food.


OUTCOME V. Strengthened enabling environment and cross-cutting programmes for achieving food and nutrition security

Programme V.1. Improved food safety, quality control and assurance, awareness on food safety and hygiene

Expected programme aggregate output: Food safety is improved through the introduction of good practices at all steps of the food supply chain complemented by awareness raising and measures to ensure the conformity of foods for consumption.

Justification for this programme: Contamination and adulteration throughout the food chain remains a critical problem for Bangladesh. Heavy metals and trace elements accumulate in bio systems through irrigation water and soils contaminated by industrial discharge, fertiliser use, sewage and waste, eventu-ally entering the food chain. Chemical contamination also occurs due to the deliberate mixing of adul-terants to food. Bacterial contamination is common during storage, transportation and processing. Stud-ies show that many of those handling food -processed or not- are not aware of the existence of food-borne disease and of how cross-contamination can occur. In addition to jeopardising the safety of food, inadequate practices can also weaken its nutritional value. While consumers need to be made aware, standards and procedures need to be adjusted and behaviours need to be modified along with the enforcement of the existing regulatory framework. Capacity strengthening experts at national and sub-national levels in the detection and assessment of food adulteration, contamination and dietary risk surveillance also requires urgent attention.


V.1.1. Ensure conformity of foods for consumption through accreditation from certification agen-cies, inspection and laboratory services

The capacities of laboratories and systems for food quality assurance, safety and control of food and food borne illness surveillance need to be strengthened. Food courts that test for adulteration of food or of the inputs that go into producing and preparing food must be developed throughout the country for greater impact. The process by which requests for risk analysis or specific requests for tests are carried out and results fed back into the food chain production system need to be rationalised. The traceability of produce is also paramount to ensure food safety. The penalties for non-compliance to the laws and regulations need to be commensurate to the fault and need to be enforced. Upgrading testing laborato-ries to international accreditation standards, for example Organic, Fair Trade, Global GAP, British Retail Consortium (BRC), will support export compliance, with great income earning potential. Modern food testing techniques should be developed in conformity with the Codex Alimentarius. Investments in ICT are also needed to develop systems for surveillance of food-related disease outbreaks. Labelling (see Sub-programme II.1.1.) is crucial to inform consumers with regards to compliance to standards such as Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution (BSTI) and Bangladesh Food Safety Authority (BFSA) rules on allergens, product and nutrient claims and needs to be expanded.

V.1.2. Introduce and popularise Good Agricultural Practices, Good Aquacultural Practices and Good Husbandry Practices that ensure food safety and quality

Farmers must be trained to apply Good Practice codes, standards and regulations which will ensure the safety and quality of produce in the food chain. This will have the additional benefits of improving natu-ral resource use, improving workers’ working conditions, and, very importantly, of creating new market opportunities for export in particular. Such improved practices will involve maintaining and improving soil organic matter by methods appropriate to agronomic, environmental and human health require-ments. Farmers will also learn the safe use of agrochemicals and prevention of residues from veterinary medications and other chemicals given in feeds from entering the food chain. The non-therapeutic use


of antibiotics on animals also needs to be regulated. Finally, the risk of infection and disease needs to be minimised through learning of good pasture management, safe feeding, appropriate stocking rates and ensuring good housing conditions. In order to be able to train farmers, the capacities of trainers -for example extension workers- will need to be enhanced on internationally recognised food control guide-lines to ensure safe food production practices. In conjunction with these activities, the Government will need to ensure that adequate standards are in place and will have to ensure compliance to these stand-ards by, for instance, regularly checking for adulteration of fertiliser at field level, providing certifica-tion to hatcheries complying with set standards as well as to agricultural input providers. It should also ban fish fry and spawn that does not hold a quality certificate.

V.1.3. Introduce and scale-up good manufacturing practices (GMP) and good hygienic practices (GHP), including adherence to Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) compliance

Post-production good handling practices are also crucial to ensure food safety and quality. Guidelines adapted to Bangladesh should be developed and disseminated through training and multiple forms of communication at all levels of the food processing chain. In particular, training should cover the Codex Alimentarius Commission’s Good Manufacturing Practices and preliminary steps to comply with HACCP systems. The on-farm processing of produce needs to be clean and handled safely. Food should be stored under hygienic and appropriate environmental and sanitary conditions. Clean and appropriate containers should be used for the packing towards transport of food. All food processing should be carried out according to set safety standards.

V.1.4. Enhance food safety education, consumer awareness and food safety networks

Awareness of the importance of food safety must be raised among different groups: cooks within the household, school children, men who often take care of the food shopping and women given their multi-ple roles in the household -preparing the food, distributing it, feeding children, storing it, etc-. Demand for safe food must be created through this increase in awareness. The work undertaken by the Bangla-desh Food Safety Network in local communities with individuals able to influence the behaviour of consumers -community and religious leaders, journalists, etc.- should be expanded. The production and distribution of materials that has so far taken place through the Directorate General of Health Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning should be continued, adapted and expanded to DLS, DoF and DAE, and televised messages should go beyond public service messaging by, for example, incorporating them in existing programmes -children’s programmes, popular serials, etc.-. More research in the areas of food safety is critically needed.


In spite of being considered paramount in ensuring FNS in Bangladesh, this programme is small. The Minis-try of Food, however, is planning to establish seven food laboratories throughout the country and the NNS has several components dealing with different aspects of this programme. A component of the LDDMPP also plans to consider these matters.

Additional considerations: Safeguarding food safety from the time it is produced until the moment it is ingested involves many regulatory bodies whose responsibilities can sometimes overlap. Coordina-tion is therefore vital. The role of the private sector in food production is also crucial and needs to be effectively regulated through dissuasive penalties. Greater coordination on food safety management with concerted efforts of all stakeholders needs to be ensured.

Programme V.2. Reduced food losses and waste

Expected programme aggregate output: Food losses and waste are minimised throughout the produc-tion chain down to consumption by households.

Justification for this programme: Reduction of food loss and waste is now part of the 2030 Agenda under SDG 12, which seeks to “ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns”. Target 12.3


under this goal is “for halving per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels and reducing food losses along the production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses, by 2030”28. In Bang-ladesh, as in the rest of the world, a substantial portion of the food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted. Estimates for post-harvest losses of crops range between 20% and 40% in fruits and vegetables. This is particularly problematic when it concerns nutrient dense produce that are rich in protein and micronutrients -vegetables, fruits, fish, meat and dairy- which are potentially critical for food security and nutrition. Food loss include losses in nutritional value, economic value and food safety (see Programme V.1.). Food waste is an element of food loss and refers to discarding food or using it for non-food uses. Food losses and waste can occur at all stages of the value chain and have very different causes that need to be addressed through different approaches and strategies. There is increas-ing awareness of the extent of the food lost and wasted and research is already happening for example to try and recycle food that is generally wasted.


V.2.1. Improve methods of measuring food losses and implement appropriate measures to mini-mise food losses at farm level

More research is needed to identify the reasons underlying harvest losses followed by solutions that could help minimise this problem. Farmers also need to be trained on the best practices to ensure their crops keep healthy and disease-free, for example by sensitising them to the appropriate stage of maturity to harvest crops to maintain their quality even beyond harvest. Measures to stimulate the use of machin-ery for harvesting, cold storage facilities that enable farmers to preserve their produce also means that nutritious foods like dairy products, meats and fish can have extended lives that can also help avoid losses. Finally, encouraging partnerships between farmers and NGOs can ensure the harvests take place even when market prices are too low to make it worthwhile for the farmers. The effect of climate change on pests and diseases should not be neglected as these bear a heavy responsibility on harvest losses.

V.2.2. Strengthen capacity in post-harvest handling technology and infrastructure (transport, packaging, storage)

There is need to develop techniques that will allow the usage -as food or for industrial use- of elements of agriculture produce, such as rice bran, that are usually discarded. Infrastructure needs to be in place to guarantee continuous energy supply and prevent cold chains from being broken, a factor that still accounts for much of the deterioration of food in Bangladesh. The lack of processing facilities is an important reason for food losses especially with regards to seasonal produce for which small to medium producers cannot gain from given the size of the investments required. By encouraging the development of contract farming linkages between processors and farmers and creating an enabling environment for private sector investment, this problem can be circumvented. ICTs can also render food value chains more efficient thus minimising losses. Providing training to those who handle food in the food process-ing chain will also contribute to the decline of food spoilage. For the food that is wasted, alternative uses need to be found such as turning it into animal food or compost.

V.2.3. Reduce wastage and quality/quantity loss of food products at all stages of marketing and consumption

Although the proportion of food waste and losses is lower at the end of the food value chain in a lower middle-income country like Bangladesh, the societal changes that are happening are likely to increase the prevalence of this problem. As the country’s middle class grows, supermarkets are multiplying in the capital and novel processed foods are being sold. Labelling, packaging and pricing strategies e.g. that encourage overbuying all contribute to food waste. Retailers need to be sensitised and incentivised to adopt practices that will minimise the problem. While consumer food wastage is still limited, people need to be made aware of the nutritional losses that can be incurred through certain methods of storage or preparation versus others for example29. Additionally, waste can be minimised by encouraging and promoting the use of underutilised parts of plants -stalks, seeds and leaves-

28 The FLW reduction goal was also included as one of the five targets in the zero hunger challenge launched by the UN at the Rio+20 Conference in 2012. 29This may be done in association with the activities under Sub-programme III.1.1.


that are nutritious but often discarded. Plate waste should also be controlled by preparing and consum-ing appropriate portions of foods in households, hospitals, institutions and communities. This has impli-cations for weight control, health and cost issues.


This programme stands out for the absence of ongoing and pipeline projects. The extensive consulta-tions leading to the development of this document clearly flagged the issue of food losses and waste as paramount and the lack of any development investment so far should motivate the GoB and DPs to channel funding towards these issues.

Additional considerations: Knowledge and data about food losses and waste is limited in Bangladesh and major efforts will be needed to change this. Bangladesh should play an active role in the internation-al initiatives that are taking place in this regard: the Committee of World Food Security (CFS 41st session) has called on public, private and civil society actors to promote a common understanding of Food Loss and Waste (FLW) which will enable adequate monitoring and measurement. Alongside, the SDGs have included a Global Food Loss Index (GFLI) to be developed by FAO for its target 12.3 to ‘by 2030, halve the per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer level, and reduce food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses’. A Global Initiative on Food Loss and Waste Reduction30 is also bringing together donors, bi- and multi-lateral agencies and financial institutions and private sector partners -the food packaging industry and others- to develop and imple-ment the programme on food loss and waste reduction.

Programme V.3. Improved information and data for evidence-based monitoring and adjustment of policies and programmes

Expected programme aggregate output: FNS-related decisions are based on evidence and high-qual-ity, timely and comprehensive food and nutrition security analysis that draws on data and information available in the network of existing sector and stakeholder information systems.

Justification for this programme: Monitoring of FNS policies and programmes relies on evidence and indicators produced by a host of institutions. Studies on key drivers of poor dietary diversity and malnu-trition and best practices also inform this process. BCC on nutrition skills which is needed across stake-holders and sectors must deliver a consistent and effective message built on existing local knowledge attitudes and practices. While there is no dearth of FNS information in Bangladesh, coordination and harmonisation is required to build an effective and operational information system.


V.3.1. Produce more reliable and timely FNS information and data through improved informa-tion infrastructures, enhanced coordination in data collection and data exchange to improve evidence-based decision making, policy formulation and programming

The human and institutional capacities to regularly undertake and analyse food consumption surveys need to be strengthened and food and nutrition security surveillance reinforced, especially to monitor change in diets and nutrient intake of different sections of the population. Human capacities need to be built to systematically integrate the recommendations drawn from these analyses and other studies into new policies and strategies, including in regular reviews of the CIP2. The Food Composition Tables should be regularly updated and should serve to determine the needs for imports given the actual and forecast production of different foods, including micronutrient-rich foods, such as vegetables, fruit, fish, dairy and livestock, in view of the nutritional needs of the country. An important contribution of this data is the generation of food supply databases, not only in terms of quantity, but also in terms of nutrient supply. This information will assist the Government to prioritise policies, strategies and invest-ments in food production systems of diverse, nutritious foods to meet the recommended nutrient needs 30SAVE FOOD, led by FAO and Messe Düsseldorf.


of the population, especially vulnerable population groups. The outcomes of these studies should be disseminated widely to all stakeholders for enhanced policy-making. Because the information required to monitor the CIP2 covers so many different domains with very varied sources, infrastructure is needed to develop a comprehensive network of food and nutrition security information system, in line with the creation of a ‘Digital Bangladesh’ as envisioned by Vision 2021. A prerequisite for such system to exist is the harmonisation of food and nutrition security information systems across sectors which considers UN fundamental principles, and quality standards and good practices such as the IMF General Data Dissemination System (GDDS) and Special Data Dissemination Standards (SDDS).


Many SDG indicators are relevant to the CIP2 and will be used once they become available. The Bang-ladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), as part of the National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) Implementation Support Project (2013–2023), is starting to develop projects that will help collect and measure data to fill existing gaps in the SDG results framework but this is not yet included as pipeline projects. The whole NSDS is costed at around US$600 million with four priority areas: improving the quality, coverage, and use of core statistics required for national planning and economic management and for monitoring progress towards national goals; strengthening the professionalism of the NSS; building capacity to collect, compile, disseminate, and, especially, use statistics at the local level; and promoting and strengthening access to and the use of official statistics at all levels of the society, based on an ‘open-data strategy’. The National Information Platform for Nutrition (NIPN) initiative is underway that will complement and support existing FSN databases and tools that can inform policies, interventions and investments.

Additional considerations: Coordinating all actors involved in this programme will be challenging given the host of stakeholders involved i.e. data users and producers: the administration of the GoB, Bangladesh’s Parliament, the private sector, universities, research centres, civil society, media etc. as well as international partners.

Programme V.4. Strengthened FNS governance, capacity strengthening and leadership across FNS relevant stakeholders

Expected programme aggregate output: National capacities to design and implement and monitor policies, investment plans, programmes and legal frameworks are enhanced.

Justification for this programme: Embracing a nutrition-sensitive food systems approach for the CIP2 provides a framework that can be more adapted to the complexity of the challenges associated with solving food and nutrition insecurity. Tackling FNS in Bangladesh involves many interrelated actors and requires them to closely coordinate to enhance effectiveness, avoid duplications and exploit synergies. This necessitates enhanced capacities to effectively implement policies and programmes, for continuous monitoring of these policies and programmes based on reliable evidence (see Programme V.3.) that will feed back into revisions of policies and programmes such as the CIP2 and the NPAN2. Close linkages with the numerous national and international FNS frameworks and networks as well as with the Food Planning and Monitoring Committee (FPMC), BNNC and BFSA are important to achieve the National Food Policy and Nutrition Policy goals. Promoting the inclusion of the Right to Food -inclusive of nutrition- as a fundamental principle of state policy can also improve FNS govern-ance by improving accountability and eliminating uncertainties with regards to different stakeholders’ roles and obligations. To this end, linkages between CIP2 and NPAN2 implementation and monitoring must be strengthened, and synergies need to be created.



V.4.1. Strengthen existing national coordination mechanisms liaising with existing FNS frame-works, clusters and networks, including the SUN initiative and networks working towards integrating the Right to Food to the Constitution

In addition to technical food security related skills, management and coordination capacities are also needed to successfully operate the numerous linkages between stakeholders, especially in core depart-ments of the Ministries of Agriculture, Fisheries and Livestock, Food, Health and Family Welfare, Women and Children Affairs, but also with frameworks such as the SUN initiative and networks work-ing towards integrating the Right to Food to the Constitution. With regards to food safety, while the 2013 Food Safety Act makes provisions for the regulation of activities relating to food production, the current governance structure needs to be streamlined: a national food control plan is urgently required to delineate responsibilities, facilitate laboratory networking and sharing of data and information under the leadership of the Bangladesh Food Safety Laboratory Network (BFSLN) linking it with relevant authorities such as BSTI. To ensure that all stakeholders understand their role and importance in the execution of FNS policies and programmes, nutrition objectives need to be incorporated in all sector development programmes that concern food systems through trainings, organisation of events, meet-ings and publications.

V.4.2. Strengthen capacities to design and monitor the new Food and Nutrition Security Policy and implement, monitor and coordinate the CIP2

The ability of the Government to design, monitor and implement the national and international policies, strategies and programmes aiming to achieve food and nutrition security for all -the forthcoming Food and Nutrition Security Policy, CIP2, NPAN2, SDG2, etc.- should continue to be enhanced. The capaci-ties of all stakeholders -government, including local government, civil society, and the private sector- to contribute to the development and monitoring and implementation of food systems-related documents also need to be strengthened.


The ‘Revitalization, operation, inter-ministerial and multi-sectoral coordination of BNNC and imple-mentation of the NNS’ has been included as a pipeline project as well as the MUCH project. This latter project assists the GoB to achieve a strengthened enabling environment for eradicating food insecurity and malnutrition, developing human and institutional capacities for designing and implementing FNS policies and monitoring their implementation, with a specific focus on the Country Investment Plan.

Additional considerations: Local Consultative Groups (LCGs) relevant to FNS need to become more active in particular to follow up on decisions taken by the Economic Relations Division (ERD). Also, there is currently no LCG dealing specifically with social protection. Such an entity would be useful to effectively communicate with the GoB’s Central Management Committee on SSNs. BNNC whose responsibilities include providing policy guidance on nutrition, assessing the impacts of the programmes, coordination of nutrition activities across ministries should be made fully functional so as to be able to participate effectively to the CIP2 monitoring.



Tab

le 2

. Sum

mar

y ta

ble

of a

ll in

vest

men

t pro

gram

mes

, sub

-pro

gram

mes

and

res

pons

ible

age

ncie

s

I. D

iver

sifie

d an

d su

stai

nabl

e ag

ricu

lture

, fis

heri

es a

nd

lives

tock

for

heal

thy

diet

s

I.1

Sust

aina

ble

inte

nsifi

catio

n an

d di

vers

ifica

tion

of

crop

-bas

ed

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

s

I.1.1

. Enh

ance

agr

icul

tura

l res

earc

h an

d kn

owle

dge,

and

tech

nolo

gy

deve

lopm

ent f

or m

ore

prod

uctiv

e, d

iver

se, s

usta

inab

le a

nd n

utrit

ion-

sens

itive

agr

icul

ture

NA

RS

inst

itute

s, D

AE,

DLS

, DoF

, DoE

, BA

DC

, BIN

A a

nd

BM

DA

U

nive

rsiti

es, H

KI,

CG

IAR

cen

ters

(IR

RI,

CIM

MY

T an

d W

orld

Fish

, IFP

RI,

Har

vest

plus

for e

xam

ple)

, priv

ate

sect

or,

NG

Os

USA

ID, D

fID

, WB

, ID

A, I

FC, I

DB

, EK

N, F

AO

, LC

G su

b gr

oups

, inc

ludi

ng A

FSR

D

I.1.2

. Dev

elop

tech

nolo

gies

incl

udin

g bi

otec

hnol

ogie

s and

mea

sure

s to

adap

t ag

ricul

tura

l sys

tem

s to

clim

ate

chan

ge

I.1.3

. Im

prov

e an

d ex

pand

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve e

xten

sion

pro

gram

mes

and

ag

ricul

tura

l adv

isor

y se

rvic

es

I.2

Impr

oved

acc

ess,

qual

ity a

nd

man

agem

ent o

f ag

ricul

tura

l in

puts

, inc

ludi

ng

wat

er a

nd la

nd

I.2.1

. Enh

ance

ava

ilabi

lity

and

effic

ient

use

of a

fford

able

and

qua

lity

inpu

ts

(see

ds, f

ertil

iser

s, pe

stic

ides

) and

cre

dit f

or sa

fe a

nd d

iver

sifie

d cr

ops

NA

RS

inst

itute

s, M

oA, D

AE,

BA

DC

, BC

IC, S

CA

, BST

I, B

MD

A, N

WR

C, L

GED

, BW

DB

U

nive

rsiti

es, C

SOs,

CG

IAR

cent

ers (

IRRI

, CIM

MY

T an

d W

orld

Fish

and

Har

vest

plus

for e

xam

ple)

, priv

ate

sect

or,

farm

ers'

orga

nisa

tions

ID

A, A

DB,

IFA

D, I

DB,

JICA

, USA

ID, D

anid

a, A

usA

id, E

U,

Kor

ea, S

witz

erla

nd, E

KN

, LC

G su

b gr

oups

, inc

ludi

ng th

e LC

G o

n A

FSR

D, t

he L

CG

on

Wat

er, t

he L

CG

on

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

and

Envi

ronm

ent

I.2.2

. Pre

serv

e ag

ricul

tura

l lan

d fe

rtilit

y an

d es

tabl

ish

land

righ

ts o

f mos

t vu

lner

able

pop

ulat

ions

I.2

.3. I

mpr

ove

wat

er m

anag

emen

t thr

ough

con

serv

atio

n, su

stai

nabl

e ex

tract

ion

and

distr

ibut

ion

of g

roun

d w

ater

and

effi

cien

t use

of s

urfa

ce w

ater

fo

r irr

igat

ion

I.2.4

. Miti

gate

the

effe

cts o

f sal

ine

wat

er in

trusi

on a

nd it

s im

pact

on

food

pr

oduc

tion

and

impl

icat

ions

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

I.3

Enha

nced

pr

oduc

tivity

and

su

stai

nabl

e pr

oduc

tion

ofan

imal

sour

ce fo

ods

I.3.1

. Im

prov

e m

anag

emen

t of f

ishe

ries,

lives

tock

and

pou

ltry

to in

crea

se

prod

uctio

n an

d pr

oduc

tivity

and

nut

ritio

nal v

alue

whi

le e

nsur

ing

sust

aina

bilit

y

DoF

, BFD

C, B

FRI,

DLS

, BLR

I U

nive

rsiti

es, C

GIA

R ce

nter

s (W

orld

Fish

and

Har

vest

plus

for

exam

ple)

, priv

ate

sect

or,

CSO

s U

SAID

, AD

B, D

AN

IDA

, EK

N a

nd W

orld

Ban

k I.3

.2. S

usta

in m

icro

nutri

ent-r

ich

anim

al fo

od p

rodu

ctio

n th

roug

h co

nser

ving

fis

herie

s and

live

stoc

k bi

odiv

ersi

ty

I.3.3

. Stre

ngth

en su

stai

nabl

e sh

rimp

aqua

cultu

re, m

arin

e fis

herie

s and

fa

rmin

g sy

stem

s ada

pted

to g

eogr

aphi

cal z

ones

I.3

.4. I

mpr

ove

fishe

ries,

lives

tock

and

pou

ltry

heal

th se

rvic

es, q

ualit

y in

puts

an

d su

rvei

llanc

e

II. E

ffic

ient

an

d nu

triti

on-

sens

itive

pos

t-ha

rves

t tr

ansfo

rmat

ion

and

valu

e ad

ditio

n

II.1

Stre

ngth

ened

pos

t-ha

rves

t val

ue c

hain

w

ith p

artic

ular

fo

cus o

n M

SMEs

(s

tora

ge,

proc

essi

ng,

bran

ding

, lab

ellin

g,

mar

ketin

g an

d tra

de)

II.1.

1. D

evel

op sk

ills a

nd st

reng

then

cap

acity

to p

roce

ss a

nd su

pply

safe

and

nu

trien

t-ric

h fo

ods w

ith e

mph

asis

on q

ualit

y sta

ndar

ds a

nd n

utrie

nt la

belli

ng

info

rmat

ion

MoI

, DA

M, D

AE,

DLS

, DoF

, AIS

, BFD

C

Priv

ate

sect

or, B

APA

, BR

AC

, C

SOs

IFA

D, A

DB

, WB

, DA

NID

A, I

DB

, DFI

D, G

IZ, E

KN

and

K

FW

II.1

.2. A

dopt

app

ropr

iate

tech

nolo

gy a

nd st

reng

then

infra

stru

ctur

e to

allo

w

qual

ity im

prov

emen

t, va

lue

addi

tion

and

forti

ficat

ion

of fo

ods

II.1

.3. M

obili

se a

nd p

rom

ote

prod

ucer

and

mar

ketin

g gr

oups

for i

mpr

oved

m

arke

t acc

ess a

nd b

arga

inin

g po

wer

, esp

ecia

lly fo

r wom

en a

nd sm

allh

olde

rs

Inve

stmen

t are

a (p

illar

) n.

In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e

Sub-

prog

ram

mes

(pri

ority

inte

rven

tions

) M

ain

inst

itutio

ns in

volv

ed


Inve

stmen

t are

a (p

illar

) n.

In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e

Sub-

prog

ram

mes

(pri

ority

inte

rven

tions

) M

ain

inst

itutio

ns in

volv

ed

II.2

Im

prov

ed a

cces

s to

m

arke

ts, f

acili

ties

and

info

rmat

ion

II.2

.1. I

mpr

ove

mar

ket i

nfra

stru

ctur

es, p

hysi

cal a

cces

s to

mar

ket f

acili

ties

LGED

, MoA

, MoI

, MoW

CA

Pr

ivat

e se

ctor

incl

udin

g th

e B

angl

ades

h C

old

Stor

age

Ass

ocia

tion

(BC

SA),

CSO

s IF

AD

, AD

B, W

B, E

KN

, DA

NID

A, I

DB

, DfI

D, J

ICA

, GIZ

, K

FW

II.2

.2. S

treng

then

priv

ate

sect

or p

artic

ipat

ion

and

publ

ic p

rivat

e pa

rtner

ship

s II

.2.3

. Sca

le-u

p in

form

atio

n di

ssem

inat

ion

incl

udin

g th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f IC

T fa

cilit

ies

III.

Im

prov

ed

diet

ary

dive

rsity

, co

nsum

ptio

n an

d ut

ilisa

tion

III.1

Enha

nced

nut

ritio

n kn

owle

dge,

pr

omot

ion

of g

ood

prac

tices

, and

cons

umpt

ion

of s

afe

and

nutri

tious

die

ts

III.1

.1. S

cale

up

nutri

tion

train

ing,

beh

avio

ur c

hang

e co

mm

unic

atio

ns (B

CC

) fo

r enh

ance

d kn

owle

dge,

safe

stor

age,

hou

seho

ld p

roce

ssin

g an

d im

prov

ed

cons

umpt

ion

DG

HS,

IPH

N, B

IRTA

N, M

oWC

A, M

oI, M

oPM

E, D

AE,

D

LS, B

AR

C, D

AM

, DoF

IN

FS, B

BF,

BN

NC

, BIR

DEM

, IFP

RI,

CSO

s (in

clud

ing

H

KI,

ICD

DR

,B, W

orld

Fish

, BR

AC

) and

priv

ate

sect

or

Wor

ld B

ank,

JDC

F, W

HO

, UN

ICEF

, WFP

, UN

FPA

, JIC

A,

USA

ID, E

KN

, DfI

D, F

AO

and

EU

III.1

.2. P

reve

nt a

nd c

ontro

l non

-com

mun

icab

le d

isea

ses (

NC

Ds)

and

ens

ure

heal

thy

diet

s th

roug

h pr

omot

ion

of d

ieta

ry g

uide

lines

link

ed w

ith n

atio

nal

NC

D st

rate

gies

and

rela

ted

nutri

tion

serv

ices

II

I.1.3

. Kno

wle

dge

base

d to

ols a

nd re

sear

ch o

n th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

pr

omot

ion

of n

utrie

nt d

ense

reci

pes u

sing

loca

l foo

ds fo

r enh

anci

ng

dive

rsifi

ed fo

od c

onsu

mpt

ion

to re

duce

stun

ting,

was

ting

and

mic

ronu

trien

t de

ficie

ncie

s

III.2

Opt

imis

ed fo

od

utili

satio

n th

roug

h pr

ovis

ion

of s

afe

wat

er, i

mpr

oved

fo

od h

ygie

ne a

nd

sani

tatio

n

III.2

.1. S

cale

up

the

supp

ly o

f saf

e w

ater

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

dom

estic

use

M

oFoo

d, M

oA, M

oI, D

PHE

, IPH

N, I

EDC

R, D

LS,

LG

ED,

LGD

, DPH

E W

ASH

, IC

DD

R,B

, Pla

n In

tern

atio

nal,

BR

AC

and

oth

er

CSO

s U

NIC

EF, F

AO

, WH

O a

nd E

KN

III.2

.2. E

nsur

e hy

gien

ic fo

od h

andl

ing,

pre

para

tion

and

serv

ices

, and

scal

e-up

han

d w

ashi

ng b

ehav

iour

II

I.2.3

. Im

prov

e sa

nita

ry fa

cilit

ies a

nd p

ract

ices

-inc

ludi

ng th

e pr

even

tion

of

anim

al c

ross

-con

tam

inat

ion-

for r

educ

ing

diar

rhea

l and

food

bor

ne il

lnes

s an

d ch

ild u

nder

nutri

tion

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

so

cial

pr

otec

tion

and

safe

ty n

ets

and

incr

ease

d re

silie

nce

IV.1

Tim

ely

and

effe

ctiv

e di

sast

er

prep

ared

ness

and

re

spon

ses

thro

ugh

emer

genc

y fo

od

dist

ribut

ion,

ste

ps

tow

ards

agr

icul

tura

l se

ctor

reha

bilit

atio

n an

d m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s

IV.1

.1.

Incr

ease

the

resi

lienc

e of

agr

icul

tura

l sys

tem

s, in

clud

ing

the

prod

uctio

n of

dis

aste

r-re

silie

nt n

utrit

ious

cro

ps e

spec

ially

by

vuln

erab

le

popu

latio

ns

MoA

, BA

RC

, MoS

W, M

oFoo

d, M

oF, M

oFL,

MoD

MR

M

oPM

E C

SOs

and

NG

Os

that

inte

rven

e in

dis

aste

rs

Wor

ld B

ank,

AD

B, W

FP, U

NFP

A, J

ICA

, USA

ID, E

KN

, D

fID

and

EU

, LC

G s

ub g

roup

s on

Dis

aste

r and

Em

erge

ncy

Rel

ief a

nd P

over

ty

IV.1

.2. E

nsur

e so

cial

and

eco

nom

ic a

cces

s to

food

for t

he p

oore

st se

ctio

ns o

f th

e po

pula

tion

in ti

mes

of c

risis

and

in a

reas

mos

t aff

ecte

d by

dis

aste

r

IV.1

.3. S

cale

-up

mod

ern

food

stor

age

faci

litie

s for

impr

oved

Pub

lic F

ood

Dis

tribu

tion

Syst

em p

artic

ular

ly in

dis

aste

r-pr

one

area

s

IV.2

Stre

ngth

ened

soc

ial

prot

ectio

n an

d sa

fety

net

pr

ogra

mm

es fo

r ta

rget

ed g

roup

s ac

ross

the

life

cycl

e in

clud

ing

disa

bled

an

d di

spla

ced

popu

latio

n

IV.2

.1. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

safe

ty n

et p

rogr

amm

es a

cros

s the

life

cyc

le

supp

ortin

g vu

lner

able

gro

ups s

uch

as p

oor w

omen

, chi

ldre

n, th

e el

derly

, di

sabl

ed p

eopl

e an

d di

spla

ced

popu

latio

ns

BA

RC

, MoS

W, M

oWC

A, M

oFoo

d, M

oF, M

oFL,

and

M

oHFW

, MoD

MR

MoP

ME

are

the

mai

n on

es b

ut m

any

mor

e ar

e in

volv

ed (a

tota

l of 2

3)

BIR

TAN

, SD

F, IF

PRI,

BR

AC

and

oth

er C

SOs

Wor

ld B

ank,

JIC

A, W

FP, U

NFP

A,U

NIC

EF, U

SAID

, EK

N,

DfI

D, E

U, L

CG

sub

gro

ups

on D

isas

ter a

nd E

mer

genc

y R

elie

f and

Pov

erty

IV.2

.2. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

pro

gram

mes

for s

uppo

rting

peo

ple

livin

g in

vu

lner

able

and

dis

adva

ntag

ed a

reas

(cha

r lan

d, ri

ver b

ank,

hao

rs, h

ill tr

acts

an

d ur

ban

area

s)

IV.2

.3. I

ntro

duce

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve so

cial

safe

ty n

et p

rogr

amm

es (S

SNP)

in

clud

ing

food

forti

ficat

ion

espe

cial

ly fo

r mot

hers

and

chi

ldre

n

V.

Stre

ngth

ened

en

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t an

d cr

oss-

cutt

ing

prog

ram

mes

fo

r ac

hiev

ing

food

and

nu

triti

on

secu

rity

V.1

Impr

oved

food

sa

fety

, qua

lity

cont

rol a

nd

assu

ranc

e,

awar

enes

s on

food

sa

fety

and

hyg

iene

V.1

.1. E

nsur

e co

nfor

mity

of f

oods

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

thro

ugh

accr

edita

tion

from

cer

tific

atio

n ag

enci

es, i

nspe

ctio

n an

d la

bora

tory

ser

vice

s

BFS

A, B

AB

, BST

I, ne

w fo

od s

afet

y la

bora

tory

of

Ban

glad

esh

Stan

dard

s an

d Te

stin

g In

stitu

tion,

NFS

L, I

PH,

DG

F, D

oF, B

LRI,

CD

IL-D

LS, B

AR

C, D

AE-

PPW

, IPH

N

(DG

HS)

, IPH

, DG

HS,

DPH

E, B

CSI

R, B

FSLN

, MoA

, MoF

L,

MoS

T, B

AEC

, NC

RPC

and

the

DN

CR

P in

par

ticul

ar,

NFS

MA

C a

nd th

e lo

cal g

over

nmen

t bod

ies,

MoE

and

M

oHFW

, MoW

CA

, MoP

ME,

MoE

d, M

oI, M

oFL,

MoF

ood;

A

rmed

For

ces

Food

and

Dru

g La

bora

tory

, BA

RI (

Toxi

colo

gy

Lab)

, etc

.), lo

cal g

over

nmen

t (PH

L - D

CC

) Th

e no

n-pr

ofit

sect

or s

uch

as B

angl

ades

h C

rop

Prot

ectio

n A

ssoc

iatio

n, N

GO

s; B

angl

ades

h Fi

sher

ies R

esea

rch

Inst

itute

(B

FRI)

and

aut

onom

ous

inst

itutio

ns (I

FST

(BC

SIR

), B

AEC

, B

AR

I and

BR

RI)

, CA

B, B

BF;

Pub

lic e

duca

tiona

l ins

titut

ions

(C

AR

S, th

e C

hem

istry

Dep

artm

ent a

nd M

icro

biol

ogy

Dep

artm

ent o

f Dha

ka U

nive

rsity

; DFT

RI,

the

Dep

artm

ent

of B

ioch

emis

try a

nd th

e D

epar

tmen

t of A

quac

ultu

re o

f BA

U),

SUN

net

wor

ks E

U, U

SAID

, FA

O, E

KN

, WH

O

V.1

.2. I

ntro

duce

and

pop

ular

ise

Goo

d A

gric

ultu

ral P

ract

ices

, Goo

d A

qua-

cultu

ral P

ract

ices

and

Goo

d H

usba

ndry

Pra

ctic

es th

at e

nsur

e fo

od s

afet

y an

d qu

ality

V.1

.3. I

ntro

duce

and

sca

le-u

p go

od m

anuf

actu

ring

prac

tices

(GM

P) a

nd

good

hyg

ieni

c pr

actic

es(G

HP)

incl

udin

g ad

here

nce

to H

azar

d A

naly

sis

and

Crit

ical

Con

trol P

oint

s (H

AC

CP)

com

plia

nce

V.1

.4. E

nhan

ce fo

od sa

fety

edu

catio

n, c

onsu

mer

aw

aren

ess a

nd fo

od s

afet

y ne

twor

ks

V.2

R

educ

ed fo

od

loss

es a

nd w

aste

V.2

.1. I

mpr

ove

met

hods

of m

easu

ring

food

loss

es a

nd im

plem

ent

appr

opria

te m

easu

res

to m

inim

ise

food

loss

es a

t far

m le

vel

MoF

ood,

MoA

, MoF

L U

nive

rsiti

es (B

AU

), IF

PRI

FAO

, EK

N

V.2

.2. S

treng

then

cap

acity

in p

ost-h

arve

st h

andl

ing

tech

nolo

gy a

nd

infr

astru

ctur

e (tr

ansp

ort,

pack

agin

g, s

tora

ge)

V.2

.3. R

educ

e w

asta

ge a

nd q

ualit

y/qu

antit

y lo

ss o

f foo

d pr

oduc

ts a

t all

stag

es o

f mar

ketin

g an

d co

nsum

ptio

n

V.3

Impr

oved

in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta fo

r evi

denc

e-ba

sed

mon

itorin

g an

d ad

just

men

t of

polic

ies

and

prog

ram

mes

V.3

.1. P

rodu

ce m

ore

relia

ble

and

timel

y FN

S in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta th

roug

h im

prov

ed in

form

atio

n in

fras

truct

ures

, enh

ance

d co

ordi

natio

n in

dat

a co

llect

ion

and

data

exc

hang

e to

impr

ove

evid

ence

-bas

ed d

ecis

ion

mak

ing,

po

licy

form

ulat

ion

and

prog

ram

min

g

BB

S, D

AM

, DA

E, B

angl

ades

h B

ank,

NIP

U, F

PMU

, N

IPO

RT,

MoF

L, F

inan

ce D

ivis

ion,

Hea

lth In

form

atio

n Se

rvic

es o

f the

DG

HS,

ER

D

Partn

ersh

ip in

Sta

tistic

s fo

r Dev

elop

men

t in

the

21st

Cen

tury

(P

AR

IS21

), an

d C

SOs

(HK

I)

FAO

, UN

ICE

F, W

FP, W

HO

, EK

N, W

orld

Ban

k, W

AR

PO

V.4

Stre

ngth

ened

FN

S go

vern

ance

, ca

paci

ty

stre

ngth

enin

g an

d le

ader

ship

acr

oss

FNS

rele

vant

st

akeh

olde

rs

V.4

.1. S

treng

then

exi

stin

g na

tiona

l coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

s lia

isin

g w

ith

exis

ting

FNS

fram

ewor

ks, c

lust

ers

and

netw

orks

incl

udin

g th

e SU

N

initi

ativ

e an

d ne

twor

ks w

orki

ng to

war

ds in

tegr

atin

g th

e R

ight

to F

ood

to th

e C

onst

itutio

n

MoF

ood

and

the

FPM

U in

par

ticul

ar, E

RD

, all

the

min

istri

es

incl

uded

in th

e Te

chni

cal W

orki

ng G

roup

s C

SOs

(BN

NC

, Nag

orik

Udd

yog,

Cam

paig

n on

Rig

ht to

Foo

d an

d So

cial

Sec

urity

(RtF

&SS

) and

BLA

ST fo

r exa

mpl

e),

univ

ersi

ties

EU, U

SAID

, FA

O, A

DB

, WH

O, E

KN

, LC

Gs

rele

vant

to

FSN

V.4

.2. S

treng

then

cap

aciti

es to

des

ign

and

mon

itor t

he n

ew F

ood

and

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y Po

licy

and

impl

emen

t, m

onito

r and

coo

rdin

ate

the

CIP

2


Inve

stmen

t are

a (p

illar

) n.

In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e

Sub-

prog

ram

mes

(pri

ority

inte

rven

tions

) M

ain

inst

itutio

ns in

volv

ed

8. Anchoring of the CIP2 in FNS national and inter-national frameworksA cornerstone of the CIP1 was its harmonisation with existing government policies, programmatic tools and spending plans of all sectors concerned by FNS. In turn, the CIP1 was to become the basis for future FNS-related government plans and for development partners’ strategies and investment plans. Based on the encouraging results of the CIP1, the CIP2 endeavours to ensure a solid anchoring in existing nation-al and international frameworks. The breadth of the issues covered by the investment plan implies considering a wide-range of related frameworks.

Policy/Institutional framework

While the CIP1 organised its investment programmes around the three pillars of the NFP -availability, access and utilisation-, the food systems approach adopted with the CIP2 further broadens the scope of the strategies needed to solve the problems of hunger and malnutrition with the five pillars proposed. This entails building on an extensive number of existing policies, strategies and plans as exposed in Table 3.

The CIP2 is expected to play a significant role in meeting the SDGs. It primarily aims to achieve SDG2 ‘End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture’ while also substantially contributing to four other SDGs. SDG2 is by nature multi-sectoral and its achieve-ment requires the collaborative efforts of sectors and their relevant institutions, such as line ministries, towards common targets spelled out under SDG2, hence the mobilisation of 18 ministries/divisions and their respective agencies in the formulation of the CIP. Through its food system approach, the CIP2 aims to achieve the five SDG2 targets by setting agreed-upon milestones by 2020 -the timeframe of the CIP-. These five targets are:

• 2.1 By 2030, end hunger and ensure access by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round, by the combination of agricultural production (Programmes III.1., III.2. and III.3.) and safety net programmes (Programmes IV.1. and IV.2.);

• 2.2 By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving, by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under five years of age, and address the nutri-tional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant and lactating women and older persons through improved dietary diversity, consumption and utilisation (Programmes III.1. and III.2.) and safety net programmes (Programmes IV.1. and IV.2.);

• 2.3 By 2030, double the agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers, in particular women, indigenous peoples, family farmers, pastoralists and fishers, including through secure and equal access to land (Programme I.2.), other productive resources and inputs (Programme I.2.), knowledge, financial services, markets and opportunities for value addition and non-farm employment (Programmes II.1. and II.2.)

• 2.4 By 2030, ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices that increase productivity and production, that help maintain ecosystems, that strength-en capacity for adaptation to climate change, extreme weather, drought, flooding and other disasters, and that progressively improve land and soil quality (Programmes I.1., I.2. and I.3.)

• 2.5 By 2020, maintain genetic diversity of seeds, cultivated plants, farmed and domesticated animals and their related wild species, including through soundly managed and diversified seed and plant banks at national, regional and international levels, and ensure access to and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilisation of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge as internationally agreed (Programmes I.1., I.2. and I.3.)

• 2.c Adopt measures to ensure the proper functioning of food commodity markets and their derivatives and facilitate timely access to market information, including on food reserves, in order to help limit extreme food price volatility (Programme II.2.)


In addition, the CIP2 aims to substantially contribute to:• SDG1 ‘End poverty in all its forms everywhere’ through increasing incomes from farmers (Pro-

grammes I.1. and I.3.), value addition from agro-processing (Programme II.1.) and social protection for the most vulnerable so as to reduce extreme poverty (Programmes IV.1. and IV.2.).

• SDG3 ‘Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages’ through its Programmes III.1. and III.2. which advocate the prevention and control of NCDs through promotion of dietary guidelines and the prevention of animal cross-contamination for healthy food prepara-tion and consumption.

• SDG5 ‘Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls’. Women’s empowerment is mainstreamed in the CIP through: (i) the development of gender-sensitive agricultural technol-ogies under Programme I given women contribute to at least half of agriculture production; (ii) greater access to inputs by women (Programme I.2. and I.3.); (iii) the empowerment of wom-en’s groups as prioritised under several Programmes; (iv) the role of women in family (and children) diets when promoting dietary diversity (Programme II.1.); (v) targeting poor women, single headed households in safety net programmes (Programmes IV.1. and IV.2.).

• SDG6 ‘Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’ through Programme I.2. that promotes access, quality and management of agricultural inputs, including water and land; Programme III.2. that proposes to maximise food utilisation through provision of safe water, improved food hygiene and sanitation; and Programme V.1. that endeavours to improve food safety, quality control and assurance, awareness on food safety and hygiene.

• SDG8 ‘Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all’ through strengthening post-harvest value chains with particular focus on MSMEs (Programme II.1.) and ‘Improved physical access to markets, facil-ities and information’ (Programme II.2.).

• SDG9 ‘Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialisation and foster innovation’ through Programmes II.1. and II.2. which aim, respectively, to strengthen post-harvest value chain with particular focus on MSMEs and improve physical access to markets, facilities and information. The SDG target 9.C to ‘significantly increase access to infor-mation and communications technology and strive to provide universal and affordable access to the Internet in least developed countries by 2020’ will also contribute to Programme II.2.

• SDG12 ‘Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns’, in particular target 12.3 ‘By 2030, halve per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels and reduce food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses’. This is an important component of Programmes II.1. and II.2. which through investing in infrastructure, such as modern storage facilities or systems that preserve the cold chain, and by promoting the process-ing of certain foods, helps reduce wastage. This is also a major purpose of Programme III.1. through setting up targets in consumption and improving nutrition knowledge and of Programme V.1. by improving food safety, quality control and assurance, awareness on food safety and hygiene. But the CIP2 also devotes an entire Programme to this issue (Programme V.2.).

• SDG13 ‘Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts’. Thus, Sub-programme I.1.2. promotes the development of technologies and measures to adapt agricultural systems to climate change while Sub-programme IV.1.2. supports the production of disaster resilient nutri-tious crops especially by vulnerable populations.

• SDG14 ‘Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development’ through its proposed strengthening of suitable shrimp aquaculture and farming systems adapted to geographical zones (Programme I.3.).

• SDG17 ‘Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalise the global partnership for sustainable development’ through Programmes V.3. and V.5. which aim to improve information and data for evidence-based monitoring and adjustment of policies and programmes, and improve FNS governance, strengthen capacity and leadership across FNS relevant stakehold-ers, respectively.


These targets will have to be achieved while mitigating the risk of potential negative effect in particular on two SDGs by incorporating potential trade-offs in the design of the investment programmes: (i) SDG14 ‘Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable develop-ment’ and (ii) SDG15 ‘Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustaina-bly manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss’.

At a global level, Bangladesh has joined ranks with many countries that recognised the importance of a multi-sectoral approach to FNS to improve the plight of future generations by joining movements such as the SUN and REACH alliances. By bringing the Government, UN agencies, research organisations, civil society organisations, the private sector and international development agencies and partners together, the SUN initiative is able to ensure a coherent policy and legal framework and aligns programmes under a common results framework. REACH supports and coordinates actions on nutrition among stakeholders and also promotes a holistic approach to tackling undernutrition. In 2014, UN agencies in the REACH partnership produced a ‘Common Narrative on Undernutrition’ to strengthen their coherence on nutrition as a developmental priority and to set out how they will support the Gov-ernment and citizens in scaling up nutrition through multi-sectoral approaches.

In 2014, the Government contributed to the development of a South Asia Regional Action Framework for Nutrition (2014), which makes investment in nutrition a developmental priority and encourages SAARC (South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation) countries to prioritise the reduction in child undernutrition. Finally, in 2012, through the World Health Assembly Resolution, Bangladesh pledged to align nutrition in the 7FYP and endorsed a Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Mater-nal, Infant and Young Child Nutrition (MIYCN).

Programmatic and planning mechanisms

Vision 2021 and its associated Perspective Plan of Bangladesh 2010-2021 articulate the vision and goals of the Government to achieve prosperity for all by the 50th anniversary of Bangladesh’s inde-pendence. The National Sustainable Development Strategy (2010-2021) identifies strategic priority areas to achieve this vision. These documents identify agriculture as still the single largest source of employment, livelihoods and nutrition in the country hence the need to focus on it. But they also flag the need for nutrition-specific interventions that are targeted to the most vulnerable. The specific strate-gies to be followed are articulated in the Sixth and Seventh Five Year Plans. The CIP2 is fully aligned with the Seventh Five Year Plan (2016-2020) and the ensuing monitoring of investments foreseen in the CIP2 will help monitor the 7FYP implementation in fields related to FNS. Coherence and coordination with areas of investment foreseen in the Environment, Forestry and Climate Change (EFCC) Country Investment Plan (CIP) 2016-2021 has also been ensured.

The Annual Development Programme (ADP) that is developed yearly based on the Five Year Plan (FYP) is used to identify and cost the investment programmes of the CIP2. The Government also aligns its development planning with the Medium-Term Budgetary Framework (MTBF) ensuring that public expenditures evolve around development priorities.

Finance and resource mobilisation

The 2010 Joint Cooperation Strategy (JCS) was signed by the GoB and 18 DPs in the context of the Paris Declaration on Effectiveness. This document is in the process of being updated but the objective remains to align national and international commitments to support the 7FYP and the achievement of the SDGs. Effectiveness of development assistance is enhanced by creating common platforms for national and sector-based dialogues and facilitating a nationally owned process. Bangladesh continues to be proactive in enabling country-led effectiveness through its involvement in platforms such as the Global Partner-ship for Effective Development Co-operation which the country currently co-chairs, the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) or the Asia-Pacific Development Effectiveness Facility (AP-DEF).


The country now has a dedicated ‘Policy and Development Effectiveness Wing’ in the Ministry of Finance’s ERD which ensures development cooperation is delivering best results in compliance with aid effectiveness indicators. It also helps coordination with donors through the LCGs.

The identification of projects falling under the CIP will help the Government rationalise its investments and appeal for funds given the existence of other investment plans with potential overlaps with the CIP2, for example the Environment, Forestry and Climate Change Country Investment Plan or the investment plan associated with the NPAN2. Complementarities should be sought with these other investment plans.

In view of the success of CIP1 in providing a common framework to set priorities for FNS investments, the CIP2 is construed in a similar fashion. This tool will enable the Government to mobilise the resourc-es needed to attain its objectives for reducing hunger and malnutrition.



Tab

le 3

. Lin

kage

s be

twee

n th

e fi

ve in

vest

men

t are

as o

f the

CIP

2 an

d ot

her

polic

ies,

str

ateg

ies

and

init

iati

ves

Pilla

r R

elat

ed n

atio

nal a

nd in

tern

atio

nal p

olic

ies,

stra

tegi

es a

nd in

itiat

ives

•Th

e Pe

rspe

ctiv

e Pl

an 2

010-

2021

, Cha

pter

4 a

nd 1

3 •

Gov

ernm

ent’s

Ele

ctio

n M

anife

sto

of 2

014

•Se

vent

h Fi

ve Y

ear P

lan

2016

-202

0, C

hapt

er 4

•

Nat

iona

lAgr

icul

tura

lPol

icy

2018

•R

esea

rch

Prio

ritie

s in

Ban

glad

esh

Agr

icul

ture

, 201

0 •

(dra

ft) N

atio

nal A

gric

ultu

ral E

xten

sion

Pol

icy

2015

•

Nat

iona

l Int

egra

ted

Pest

Man

agem

ent P

olic

y 20

02 (C

hapt

er 2

) •

Ann

ual P

erfo

rman

ce A

gree

men

t (A

PA M

oA 2

016-

17)

•N

atio

nal L

ives

tock

Dev

elop

men

t Pol

icy

2007

•

(dra

ft) N

atio

nal L

ives

tock

Ext

ensi

on P

olic

y 20

12

•Fi

sher

ies S

ecto

r Roa

d M

ap 2

006

•N

atio

nal F

ishe

ries P

olic

y 19

98

•(d

raft)

Nat

iona

l Pol

icy

on M

arin

e Fi

sher

ies 2

016

•N

atio

nal F

ishe

ries S

trate

gy 2

006

•Fi

sh H

atch

ery

Act

201

0 •

Fish

Hat

cher

y R

ules

201

1 •

Fish

Fee

d an

d A

nim

al F

eed

Act

201

0 •

Fish

Fee

d R

ules

201

1 •

Nat

iona

l Pou

ltry

Dev

elop

men

t Pol

icy

2008

•

Nat

iona

l Aqu

acul

ture

Dev

elop

men

t Stra

tegy

and

Act

ion

Plan

of B

angl

ades

h 20

13-2

020

•N

atio

nal S

hrim

p Po

licy

2014

•

Nat

iona

l See

d Po

licy

1993

•

Pest

icid

es (A

men

dmen

t) A

ct 2

009

•N

atio

nal L

and

Use

Pol

icy

2001

•

Publ

ic W

ater

body

(Jal

mah

al) M

anag

emen

t Pol

icy

2009

•

Ban

glad

esh

Wat

er A

ct 2

013

•B

angl

ades

h C

limat

e C

hang

e St

rate

gy a

nd A

ctio

n Pl

an 2

009

•N

APA

200

5 •

Ban

glad

esh

Del

ta P

lan

(BD

P) 2

100

•M

aste

r Pla

n fo

r Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t in

the

Sout

hern

Reg

ion

of B

angl

ades

h 20

13

•N

atio

nal W

omen

Dev

elop

men

t Pol

icy

2011

and

its P

lan

of A

ctio

n

I. D

iver

sifie

d an

d su

stai

nabl

e ag

ricu

lture

, fis

heri

es a

nd

lives

tock

for

heal

thy

diet

s


Pilla

r R

elat

ed n

atio

nal a

nd in

tern

atio

nal p

olic

ies,

stra

tegi

es a

nd in

itiat

ives

•B

angl

ades

h EF

CC

CIP

201

6-20

21: S

ub-p

rogr

amm

e 1.

3.2

(Sus

tain

able

fish

erie

s and

fish

ing

habi

tat m

anag

emen

t in

inla

nd a

nd m

arin

e ec

osys

tem

s);

•SD

G1:

End

pov

erty

in a

ll its

form

s eve

ryw

here

•

SDG

2: E

nd h

unge

r, ac

hiev

e fo

od se

curit

y an

d im

prov

ed n

utrit

ion

and

prom

ote

sust

aina

ble

agric

ultu

re

•SD

G5:

Ach

ieve

gen

der e

qual

ity a

nd e

mpo

wer

all

wom

en a

nd g

irls

•SD

G6:

Ens

ure

avai

labi

lity

and

sust

aina

ble

man

agem

ent o

f wat

er a

nd sa

nita

tion

for a

ll •

SDG

13: T

ake

urge

nt a

ctio

n to

com

bat c

limat

e ch

ange

and

its i

mpa

cts

•SD

G14

: Con

serv

e an

d su

stai

nabl

y us

e th

e oc

eans

, sea

s and

mar

ine

reso

urce

s for

sust

aina

ble

deve

lopm

ent

II

. Eff

icie

nt a

nd

nutr

ition

-sen

sitiv

e po

st-h

arve

st

tran

sfor

mat

ion

and

valu

e ad

ditio

n

•Th

e Pe

rspe

ctiv

e Pl

an 2

010-

2021

, Cha

pter

5

•Se

vent

h Fi

ve Y

ear P

lan

2016

-202

0 (2

.5.3

Rol

e of

Tot

al F

acto

r Pro

duct

ivity

, 2.6

.1 G

loba

l Val

ue C

hain

s (G

VC

s), 2

.7.2

Gro

wth

, em

ploy

men

t and

po

verty

redu

ctio

n, 4

.2.2

Cha

lleng

es, 4

.2.3

Cro

p Se

ctor

, 4.4

.1 L

ives

tock

sub-

sect

or, 4

.4.2

Fis

herie

s sub

-sec

tor,

4.2.

8 St

rate

gy fo

r red

uctio

n of

ineq

ualit

y,

7.3.

3 R

ural

dev

elop

men

t stra

tegi

es, 7

.3.5

Stra

tegi

c pr

iorit

ies o

f LG

ED fo

r rur

al tr

ansp

ort d

evel

opm

ent a

nd m

anag

emen

t, 12

.3.4

Enh

anci

ng th

e qu

ality

as

pect

of I

CT

(Pro

mot

ing

agric

ultu

re th

roug

h IC

T)

•N

atio

nal N

utrit

ion

Polic

y: S

ectio

n 6.

1.1,

stra

tegi

es 6

.2.1

, 6.2

.5, a

nd 6

.5.8

•

NPA

N2,

201

6-25

•

Nat

iona

l Agr

icul

ture

Pol

icy

2018

•

Nat

iona

l Fis

herie

s Pol

icy

1998

: Sec

tion

7.16

- 7.

19, 9

.1.1

., 9.

1.3,

9.2

.1 -

9.2.

8, 9

.3.1

- 9.

3.3.

•

Nat

iona

l Liv

esto

ck D

evel

opm

ent P

olic

y 20

07: S

ectio

n 4.

1 - 4

.2 a

nd 4

.7 -

4.8

•Fo

od S

afet

y A

ct 2

013

•N

atio

nal S

kill

Dev

elop

men

t Pol

icy

2011

•

Nat

iona

l Ind

ustri

al P

olic

y 20

16

•B

angl

ades

h A

ccre

dita

tion

Act

ion

2006

•

Ban

glad

esh

Wat

er A

ct 2

013

•N

atio

nal W

omen

Dev

elop

men

t Pol

icy

2011

and

its P

lan

of A

ctio

n •

Ban

glad

esh

Publ

ic-P

rivat

e Pa

rtner

ship

Act

201

5

•SD

G 1

: End

pov

erty

in a

ll its

form

s eve

ryw

here

•

SDG

2: E

nd h

unge

r, ac

hiev

e fo

od se

curit

y an

d im

prov

ed n

utrit

ion

and

prom

ote

sust

aina

ble

agric

ultu

re

Sub-

prog

ram

me

1.4.

1 (I

mpr

ove

soil

ferti

lity

and

grou

ndw

ater

man

agem

ent i

n no

rth a

nd n

orth

wes

t Ban

glad

esh)

; Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

e 1.

4.3

(Man

age

coas

tal

land

and

pre

vent

and

cop

e w

ith w

ater

logg

ing

and

salin

ity);

Sub-

prog

ram

me

3.2.

1 (S

treng

then

coa

stal

and

inla

nd e

mba

nkm

ents

and

impr

ove

drai

nage

capa

city

); Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

e 3.

2.3

(Sup

port

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f irr

igat

ion

sche

mes

(dro

ught

-pro

ne a

reas

))


Pilla

r R

elat

ed n

atio

nal a

nd in

tern

atio

nal p

olic

ies,

stra

tegi

es a

nd in

itiat

ives

•SD

G5:

Ach

ieve

gen

der e

qual

ity a

nd e

mpo

wer

all

wom

en a

nd g

irls

•SD

G8:

Pro

mot

e su

stai

ned,

incl

usiv

e an

d su

stain

able

eco

nom

ic g

row

th, f

ull a

nd p

rodu

ctiv

e em

ploy

men

t and

dec

ent w

ork

for a

ll •

SDG

9: B

uild

resi

lient

infr

astru

ctur

e, p

rom

ote

incl

usiv

e an

d su

stai

nabl

e in

dust

rializ

atio

n an

d fo

ster

inno

vatio

n •

SDG

10: R

educ

e in

equa

lity

with

in a

nd a

mon

g co

untri

es

•SD

G12

: Ens

ure

sust

aina

ble

cons

umpt

ion

and

prod

uctio

n pa

ttern

s

III.

Impr

oved

di

etar

y di

vers

ity,

cons

umpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n

•Th

e Pe

rspe

ctiv

e Pl

an 2

010-

2021

, Cha

pter

11

•Se

vent

h Fi

ve Y

ear P

lan

(201

6-20

), C

hapt

er 1

4, se

ctio

n 14

.3 (E

nsur

ing

adeq

uate

nut

ritio

n fo

r all)

•

NSS

S 20

15: C

hapt

er 2

.2. P

over

ty p

rofil

e fr

om li

fecy

cle

pers

pect

ive;

Cha

pter

4.3

. Con

solid

atin

g a

lifec

ycle

syst

em

of so

cial

secu

rity

•N

atio

nal N

utrit

ion

Polic

y 20

15 (O

bjec

tive

5.2.

Ens

ure

avai

labi

lity

of a

dequ

ate,

div

ersi

fied

and

qual

ity fo

od a

nd p

rom

ote

heal

thy

feed

ing

prac

tice;

O

bjec

tive

5.4.

Stre

ngth

en n

utrit

ion-

sens

itive

inte

rven

tion)

•

NPA

N2,

201

6-25

(Cha

pter

5.B

Agr

icul

ture

and

die

t div

ersi

ty a

nd lo

cally

ada

pted

reci

pes;

Cha

pter

5.C

Soc

ial P

rote

ctio

n)

•N

atio

nal S

trate

gy o

n Pr

even

tion

and

Con

trol o

f Mic

ronu

trien

t Def

icie

ncy

2015

–202

4 •

Nat

iona

l Agr

icul

tura

l Pol

icy

2018

(Obj

ectiv

e to

enh

ance

agr

icul

ture

div

ersi

ficat

ion,

pro

duct

ion

of n

utrie

nt e

nric

hed

crop

s)

•N

atio

nal P

olic

y fo

r Saf

e W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

n, 1

998

•N

atio

nal S

trate

gy fo

r Wat

er a

nd S

anita

tion

Har

d to

Rea

ch A

reas

of B

angl

ades

h 20

11

•N

atio

nal H

ealth

Pol

icy

2011

•

Nat

iona

l Wom

en D

evel

opm

ent P

olic

y 20

11 a

nd it

s Pla

n of

Act

ion

•B

reas

t-Milk

Sub

stitu

tes,

Infa

nt F

oods

, Com

mer

cial

ly M

anuf

actu

red

Com

plem

enta

ry F

oods

and

the

Acc

esso

ries T

here

of (R

egul

atio

n of

M

arke

ting)

Act

201

3 •

SDG

2: E

nd h

unge

r, ac

hiev

e fo

od se

curit

y an

d im

prov

ed n

utrit

ion

and

prom

ote

sust

aina

ble

agric

ultu

re

•SD

G3:

Ens

ure

heal

thy

lives

and

pro

mot

e w

ell-b

eing

for a

ll at

all

ages

•

SDG

6: E

nsur

e av

aila

bilit

y an

d su

stai

nabl

e m

anag

emen

t of w

ater

and

sani

tatio

n fo

r all

•SD

G12

: Ens

ure

sust

aina

ble

cons

umpt

ion

and

prod

uctio

n pa

ttern

s •

ICN

2 (6

6 re

com

men

datio

ns)

•W

HA

Glo

bal N

utrit

ion

Targ

et 2

012

(6 G

loba

l Nut

ritio

n Ta

rget

s)


Pilla

r R

elat

ed n

atio

nal a

nd in

tern

atio

nal p

olic

ies,

stra

tegi

es a

nd in

itiat

ives

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al

prot

ectio

n an

d sa

fety

net

s and

in

crea

sed

resi

lienc

e

•Th

e Pe

rspe

ctiv

e Pl

an 2

010-

2021

, Cha

pter

12

•Se

vent

h Fi

ve Y

ear P

lan

(201

6-20

), C

hapt

er 1

4 on

Soc

ial P

rote

ctio

n •

NSS

S 20

15:

Cha

pter

2.2

. Pov

erty

Pro

file

from

Life

cycl

e Pe

rspe

ctiv

e; C

hapt

er 4

.3. C

onso

lidat

ing

a Li

fecy

cle

Syst

em o

f Soc

ial S

ecur

ity

•N

atio

nal W

omen

Dev

elop

men

t Pol

icy

2011

and

its P

lan

of A

ctio

n•

Ban

glad

esh

Envi

ronm

ent,

Fore

stry

and

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Cou

ntry

Inve

stm

ent P

lan

2016

– 2

021

•SD

G1:

End

pov

erty

in a

ll its

form

s eve

ryw

here

•

SDG

2: E

nd h

unge

r, ac

hiev

e fo

od se

curit

y an

d im

prov

ed n

utrit

ion

and

prom

ote

sust

aina

ble

agric

ultu

re

•SD

G5:

Ach

ieve

gen

der e

qual

ity a

nd e

mpo

wer

all

wom

en a

nd g

irls

•SD

G13

: Tak

e ur

gent

act

ion

to c

omba

t clim

ate

chan

ge a

nd it

s im

pact

s

V. S

tren

gthe

ned

enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent a

nd

cros

s-cu

ttin

g pr

ogra

mm

es fo

r ac

hiev

ing

food

an

d nu

triti

on

secu

rity

•Se

vent

h Fi

ve Y

ear P

lan

(201

6-20

) •

Food

Saf

ety

Act

201

3 •

Pest

icid

e (A

men

dmen

t) A

ct 2

009

•B

angl

ades

h Pl

ant Q

uara

ntin

e A

ct 2

011

•B

angl

ades

h St

anda

rds a

nd T

estin

g In

stitu

tion

(BST

I) O

rdin

ance

198

5 am

ende

d as

BST

I Act

200

3 •

Con

sum

er R

ight

Pro

tect

ion

Act

200

9

•N

atio

nal F

ood

Polic

y 20

06

•N

PAN

2, 2

016-

25

•N

atio

nal S

trate

gy fo

r Dev

elop

men

t of S

tatis

tics 2

013

•St

atis

tics A

ct 2

013

•B

angl

ades

h EF

CC

CIP

201

6-20

21: S

ub-p

rogr

amm

e 2.

3.1

(Min

imiz

e po

llutio

n fr

om fe

rtiliz

ers a

nd p

estic

ides

); Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

e 4.

3.4

(Sup

port

•SD

G2:

End

hun

ger,

achi

eve

food

secu

rity

and

impr

oved

nut

ritio

n an

d pr

omot

e su

stai

nabl

e ag

ricul

ture

•

SDG

6: E

nsur

e av

aila

bilit

y an

d su

stai

nabl

e m

anag

emen

t of w

ater

and

sani

tatio

n fo

r all

•SD

G12

: Ens

ure

sust

aina

ble

cons

umpt

ion

and

prod

uctio

n pa

ttern

s •

SDG

17: S

treng

then

the

mea

ns o

f im

plem

enta

tion

and

revi

taliz

e th

e gl

obal

par

tner

ship

for s

usta

inab

le d

evel

opm

ent

know

ledg

e sy

stem

s, in

clud

ing

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

Res

earc

h M

aste

r Pla

n an

d st

reng

then

ing

rese

arch

org

aniz

atio

ns, a

nd e

xten

sion

and

educ

atio

nal N

GO

s)

9. Institutional arrangements for coordination and monitoring towards a unified framework for the CIP2 and the SDGsThe institutional arrangements behind the formulation, coordination and monitoring of the CIP2 are similar to that of CIP1. These arrangements ensure that all those involved in the food system -whether through the design, implementation or monitoring of policies, regulations, programmes and projects that shape FNS, namely the Government, DPs, but also the private sector, farmer organisations and civil society- are politically engaged and willing to mobilise resources, financial or other, in the most efficient way possible. The CIP2 implementation builds on existing mechanisms for monitoring the progress toward SDGs and the projects financed through the ADP as part of the national planning process. Its monitoring will also be joined to that of the new NFNSP once it has been developed and approved.

The CIP2 Results-Based Monitoring31 System consists of regular reviews of progress made in the financial implementation of CIP2 Programmes (Input monitoring) combined with monitoring of progress against achieving CIP2 Outputs and Outcomes. In other words, the CIP2 monitoring is not only concerned with asking 'Are we taking the actions we said we would take?' but also 'Are we making progress on achieving the results that we said we wanted to achieve?' Monitoring involves tracking strategies and actions being taken by partners and other stakeholders, and identifying the new strategies and actions that may be taken to ensure progress towards the most important results.

Goal, Outcome and Output monitoring

At the level of overall Outcomes and Outputs, the institutional settings for CIP2 monitoring are integrated with those for monitoring SDGs relevant to FNS and the upcoming NFNSP in a unified framework which consist of TTs, Technical Working Groups also called Thematic Working Groups (TWGs), the expanded FPWG and the National Committee (NC), under the authority of FPMC and with support from FPMU32.

The Cabinet-level FPMC chaired by the Food Minister includes ministers and secretaries from key sectors and delivers strategic guidance on FNS issues and establishes a high-level commitment to inter-sectoral collaboration. It provides leadership and oversight in the formulation of food policy strategic documents developed by the institutions it oversees. But it also relies on the technical support provided by these same instances which provide feedback based on their monitoring activities (Figure 2).

The NC, also chaired by the Food Minister, comprises of the secretaries of key ministries and divisions, heads of universities/research institutions, DPs, private sector and other NGOs. The NC oversees the CIP implementation and monitoring processes.

The FPWG, chaired by the Food Secretary, performs the task of coordination and collaboration at the technical and operational level through the five TTs that carry out the monitoring.

The FPMU of the Ministry of Food provides technical and operational support to these institutions, and acts as the secretariat of the various instances. In addition to the institutional setup in place for the CIP1, eight TWGs which include focal points from each relevant government sector have been established by FPMU in partnership with 13 ministries33. These TWGs assisted the FPMU in developing the CIP2.

9. Institutional arrangements for coordination and monitoring towards a unified framework for the CIP2 and the SDGsThe institutional arrangements behind the formulation, coordination and monitoring of the CIP2 are similar to that of CIP1. These arrangements ensure that all those involved in the food system -whether through the design, implementation or monitoring of policies, regulations, programmes and projects that shape FNS, namely the Government, DPs, but also the private sector, farmer organisations and civil society- are politically engaged and willing to mobilise resources, financial or other, in the most efficient way possible. The CIP2 implementation builds on existing mechanisms for monitoring the progress toward SDGs and the projects financed through the ADP as part of the national planning process. Its monitoring will also be joined to that of the new NFNSP once it has been developed and approved.

The CIP2 Results-Based Monitoring31 System consists of regular reviews of progress made in the financial implementation of CIP2 Programmes (Input monitoring) combined with monitoring of progress against achieving CIP2 Outputs and Outcomes. In other words, the CIP2 monitoring is not only concerned with asking 'Are we taking the actions we said we would take?' but also 'Are we making progress on achieving the results that we said we wanted to achieve?' Monitoring involves tracking strategies and actions being taken by partners and other stakeholders, and identifying the new strategies and actions that may be taken to ensure progress towards the most important results.

Goal, Outcome and Output monitoring

At the level of overall Outcomes and Outputs, the institutional settings for CIP2 monitoring are integrated with those for monitoring SDGs relevant to FNS and the upcoming NFNSP in a unified framework which consist of TTs, Technical Working Groups also called Thematic Working Groups (TWGs), the expanded FPWG and the National Committee (NC), under the authority of FPMC and with support from FPMU32.

The Cabinet-level FPMC chaired by the Food Minister includes ministers and secretaries from key sectors and delivers strategic guidance on FNS issues and establishes a high-level commitment to inter-sectoral collaboration. It provides leadership and oversight in the formulation of food policy strategic documents developed by the institutions it oversees. But it also relies on the technical support provided by these same instances which provide feedback based on their monitoring activities (Figure 2).

The NC, also chaired by the Food Minister, comprises of the secretaries of key ministries and divisions, heads of universities/research institutions, DPs, private sector and other NGOs. The NC oversees the CIP implementation and monitoring processes.

The FPWG, chaired by the Food Secretary, performs the task of coordination and collaboration at the technical and operational level through the five TTs that carry out the monitoring.

The FPMU of the Ministry of Food provides technical and operational support to these institutions, and acts as the secretariat of the various instances. In addition to the institutional setup in place for the CIP1, eight TWGs which include focal points from each relevant government sector have been established by FPMU in partnership with 13 ministries33. These TWGs assisted the FPMU in developing the CIP2. 31Monitoring, together with planning and evaluation, is one of the interconnected processes of Results-Based Management (RBM). RBM is a broad management strategy aimed at achieving improved performance and demonstrable results. Monitoring is an ongoing process which ensures constant feedback, learning and improving: plans are regularly assessed and discussed based on key monitoring (and evaluation) findings and lessons learned.32Annex 6 provides the detailed composition of all these institutions.33See Annex 6 for the composition of the TWGs.



Finally, members of the Local Consultative Group on Agriculture, Food Security and Rural Development (LCG AFSRD) participate in the CIP Annual Review Meetings. The LCG AFSRD is the venue for dialogue between Government and its DPs. LCGs are designed to contribute towards effective and coordinated implementation of national policies, strategies, plans and programmes.

Given the alignment of the CIP2 with existing frameworks, the CIP2 tries to align its results framework to the SDG and 7FYP one by incorporating relevant indicators from these documents' results frameworks when relevant. The CIP Results Framework described in Section 10 is the key reference for monitoring the CIP2 Goal, Outcomes and Outputs. Progress is assessed through criteria established by the indicators identified in the CIP2 Results Matrix.

Figure 2. Institutional set up for the preparation and monitoring of the CIP2

Input monitoring

The monitoring of CIP2 Inputs -the financial aspect of the CIP2- is conducted according to the existing national system for monitoring ADP investments (Figure 3) as part of the existing national planning process which involves the Ministry of Finance and the Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED). The IMED provides aggregated information on the financial progress of investment projects relevant for the CIP while the Planning Commission and line ministries provide information about new project approvals. The information produced by IMED in particular is key to monitoring CIP Programme Outputs and Outcomes. ERD’s membership in the FPWG is critical for assessing DPs' contributions to the CIP2 with inputs from the LCG AFSRD. Similarly, the Finance Division's membership of this institution facilitates consistency of the CIP2 monitoring process with the Medium Term Budgetary Framework process.

Thematic TeamsSustain monitoring process at technical and operational levels

FPMU

Ensures secretarial,technical and

operational support

National CommitteeOversees CIP implementation and monitoring

process

Food Policy Working GroupFacilitates coordination and collaboration

of the monitoring process through TTs

FoodPlanning &

Monitoring CommitteeProvides strategic orientation

and sets high-level commitment

ThematicWorkingGroups


Figure 3. National monitoring system for ADP investments

The CIP2 annual monitoring report The CIP2 Results-Based Monitoring System produces an annual report which is the result of:

- Progress towards CIP Outcomes and Outputs prepared by the Thematic Teams under the supervision of the extended FPWG. Upon development and approval of the NFNSP and its Plan of Action (NFNSP PoA), these documents will be monitored jointly with the CIP2.

- Report on financial allocations and execution and progress towards results of CIP2 investment projects, consolidated at CIP2 Programme level.

- Reports on GoB allocations and donor commitments based on information from the Planning Commission's ADP book for the former, and from ERD for the latter.

The key reference for Input monitoring is the CIP project database, which is regularly updated through the national ADP monitoring process. Findings from monitoring ADP investment projects included in the CIP2 are aggregated at CIP2 Programme level. This information is assessed against the findings from the monitoring of other dimensions -Goal, Outcome, and Output- which gives an indication of the relevance of the investment projects to the CIP2 objectives.

Key findings from the monitoring reports are analysed and discussed within the TTs and the FPWG for further submission to the NC and FPMC. CIP2 monitoring findings are disseminated and lessons learned are incorporated into the following phases of CIP2 Programme implementation, through the coordination and guidance provided by the NC.

Further details of the CIP2 results framework and monitoring system functioning are provided in Section 10 and Annex 6.

Individual projects prepare regular financial and activity reports

Planning cell of line ministry collects the reports from each PMU and disseminates it

IMED collects all project reports,creates a databank, consolidatesfinancial reports and presents it

to NEC

NEC chaired by the PrimeMinister revises financial matters

and provides feedback torelevant line ministries

ProgrammingDivision revisesfinancial matters

and decidesallocation of new

resources

MoF's EconomicRelations Division(ERD) for donor-funded projects

Monthly

Financial report feedback Activity / technical report feedback

Quarterly Annually

IMEDcollects all

projectreports andcreates data

bank

FinanceDivision(MTBF)collects

expenditureinformation

PrimeMinister's

Officerevisesactivity

reports andprovides

feedback toline

ministries


10. Results framework, indicators of programmes and impact of investmentsThe results framework

The CIP Results Planning process is a top-down exercise which answers to the following questions:• In which areas do we have to work to improve food and nutrition security in the country? The answer to this question is the five areas of investment identified by the Government’s TWGs.

• What are the programmes to be implemented for contributing to the achievement of the CIP expect-ed outcomes? What are the aggregate outputs we want to achieve through the implementation of the CIP2 programmes?

This question led to the identification of the 13 CIP2 programmes.• What are the key investment interventions which are required to contribute to the achievement of

the CIP2 expected aggregate outputs? The answer provided brought to the identification of 39 priority investment areas.

The results that the country wants to achieve through the CIP2 in terms of national food and nutrition security are coherent with the relevant key strategic documents of the country such as the SDGs and the 7FYP. The Results Framework represents also the key reference for guiding CIP2 implementation and for monitoring progress towards the expected results.

Figure 4. CIP2 results chain

OUTCOMES: 5 Investment areas

SUB-OUTPUTS: 39 Investment sub-programmes

INPUTS: Projects Financial execution of projects

GOAL: NFP Objective

OUTPUTS: 13 Investment programmes

V.1. Improved food safety, quality control and assurance, awareness on food safety and hygiene

V.2. Reduced food losses and waste

V.3. Improved information and data for evidence-based monitoring and adjustment of policies and programmes

V.4. Strengthened FNS governance, capacity strengthening and leadership across FNS relevant stakeholders

IV.1. Timely and effective disaster responses through emergency food distribution, agriculture rehabilitation and mitigation measures

IV.2. Strengthened social protection and safety net programmes for targeted groups across the life cycle including disabled and displaced populations

III.1. Enhanced nutrition knowledge, promotion of good practices, and consumption of safe and nutritious diets

III.2. Optimised food utilisation through provision of safe water, improved food hygiene and sanitation

II.1. Strengthened post-harvest value chain with particular focus on MSMEs (storage, processing, branding, labelling, marketing and trade)

II.2. Improved access to markets, facilities and information

I.1. Sustainable intensification and diversification of crop-based production systems

I.2 Improved access, quality and management of agricultural inputs, including water and land

I.3. Enhanced productivity and sustainable production of animal source foods

I. Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets

II. Efficient and nutrition-sensitive post-harvest transformation and value addition

III. Improved dietary diversity, consumption and utilisation

IV. Enhanced access to social protection and safety nets and increased resilience


Adequate and stable supply of safe and nutritious food; increased purchasing power and access to food by all; and adequate nutrition for all individuals, especially women and children

The CIP2 results are reflected into a three-level results chain which defines a coherent architecture of logically linked expected outcomes, outputs and inputs. The CIP2 results chain planning is based on the logical framework methodology and on the key assumption that the effective implementation of the identified investment interventions will contribute to the achievement of the related expected outputs and outcomes. There are three levels in the results chain (Figure 4):

1. Outcome level: Five expected outcomes that correspond to the five Areas for Investment of the CIP2.

2. Output level: The outputs are linked to each of the 13 programmes of the CIP2. The aggregate output is considered rather than the output of each one of the 39 sub-programmes. Expected outputs are the medium-term development results that interventions seek to support.

3. Input level: Each of the 13 CIP programmes and 39 sub-programmes correspond to a number of specific projects. The monitoring of CIP at input level represents the financial execution of the projects and government and donor commitment, aggregated in the respective area of inter-vention and CIP programme.

In addition to this framework and in response to requests for elements to gauge the impact of an invest-ment programme, such as the CIP1 or CIP2, an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of five selected nutri-tion-sensitive sub-programmes of the CIP2 or specific activities/projects is planned. A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) approach will be adopted to this effect. This will help understand the potential impacts of these sub-programmes on achieving the objectives of corresponding key investment programmes. This is a first step towards an understanding of the CIP2’s effect on the country’s FNS outcomes and will lead the way to further evaluations.

Indicators

Input monitoring is carried out through the examination of financial execution of, and commitments to, the CIP2. For the output to the goal level of the results chain, the results framework matrix (Table 4) shows a set of measurable indicators. Proxy indicators have also been identified to monitor progress in the National Food Policy’s overall goal. For this level and the outcome level, in addition to measurable indicators, baseline figures and targets to be achieved within the timeframe of the CIP2 have been indicated. The latter were agreed through consultations and are consistent with the relevant strategic documents. The baseline information provides the reference against which to measure progress towards the targets. The verification sources are also provided. For the output level, a programme expected aggregate output, proxy indicators, a baseline value and verification sources have been provided at the aggregate output level.

SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-bound) indicators have been chosen to enable regular monitoring. When appropriate, indicators from the SDG and 7FYP results frameworks or existing monitoring frameworks have been adopted to further reinforce the coherence between these documents. When suitable, indicators from the CIP1/NFP Plan of Action results framework have been kept to retain some continuity between the CIP1 and CIP2 monitoring processes. However, some of these indicators are yet to be developed and the Government plans to do so. In such instances, the indicator is listed in italic and will be incorporated into the monitoring process as soon as it becomes available.

Findings from the CIP monitoring and evaluation processes will support the assessment of the relevance of the identified investment interventions and the extent to which they contribute to the achievement of CIP outputs and outcomes.



NFP

OV

ERA

LL G

OA

L

n.Pr

oxy

indi

cato

rsB

asel

ine

Targ

ets

Ver

ifica

tion

sour

ces

SDG

Indi

cato

r 2.1

.1: P

reva

lenc

e of

und

erno

uris

hmen

t 15

.1%

(201

4)

0%

by

2030

SOFI

201

7 FA

O, I

FAD

, U

NIC

EF, W

FP a

nd W

HO

1

SDG

Indi

cato

r 2.2

.1: P

reva

lenc

e of

stu

ntin

g (h

eigh

t for

ag

e <

-2 s.

d. fr

om th

e m

edia

n of

the

WH

O C

hild

Gro

wth

St

anda

rds)

am

ong

child

ren

unde

r 5 y

ears

of a

ge

36.1

% (2

014)

25

% b

y 20

20

(in 7

FYP)

N

IPO

RT,

BD

HS

2

SDG

Indi

cato

r 2.2

.2: P

reva

lenc

e of

was

ting

amon

g ch

ildre

n un

der 5

yea

rs o

f age

(<-2

s. d

. of w

eigh

t for

he

ight

)

14%

(201

4 B

DH

S)<8

% b

y 20

25

(NPA

N 2

) B

DH

S, B

BS,

SOFI

SDG

Indi

cato

r 2.1

.2: P

reva

lenc

e of

mod

erat

e or

seve

re

food

inse

curit

y in

the

popu

latio

n, b

ased

on

the

Food

In

secu

rity

Exp

erie

nce

Scal

e (F

IES)

SDG

Indi

cato

r 2.3

.1: V

olum

e of

pro

duct

ion

per l

abou

r un

it by

cla

sses

of f

arm

ing/

pasto

ral/f

ores

try e

nter

prise

size

SDG

Indi

cato

r 2.3

.2: A

vera

ge in

com

eof

smal

l-sca

le fo

od p

rodu

cers

, by

sex

and

indi

geno

us st

atus

SDG

Indi

cato

r 2.4

.1: P

ropo

rtion

of a

gric

ultu

ral a

rea

unde

r pro

duct

ive

and

susta

inab

le a

gric

ultu

re

tbd

tbd

tbd

tbd

tbd

tbd

tbd

Zero

hun

ger

a) B

BS (F

SNSP

), SI

Db)

NIP

ORT

(BD

HS)

, M

oHFW

a) D

AE, M

oAb)

BAD

C, M

oAc)

BFD

, MoE

FC

BBS

(SM

E Su

rvey

), SI

D

a) A

gri W

ing,

BBS,

SID

b) D

AE, M

oA

3E

nsur

e de

pend

able

su

stai

ned

food

se

curi

ty a

nd

nutr

ition

for

all

peop

le o

f the

co

untr

y at

all

times

EXPE

CT

ED

OU

TC

OM

ES

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

es

n.

Prox

y in

dica

tors

B

asel

ine

Tar

gets

V

erifi

catio

n so

urce

s

1 Po

A- C

IP1:

Ric

e im

port

depe

nden

cy (i

mpo

rt/av

aila

bilit

y)

2.2%

(2

015/

16)

0%

FPM

U/M

ISM

, BB

S

2 7F

YP:

Agr

icul

tura

l sec

tor G

DP

grow

th ra

te (%

) a) C

rop

and

horti

cultu

re

b) F

ishe

ries c

) Liv

esto

ck

tbd

a) 1

.40

b) tb

d c)

tbd

by 2

020

BB

S, D

AE,

DLS

, DoF

, BFD

3 Po

A- C

IP1:

Sha

re o

f ric

e val

ue ad

ded

in to

tal f

ood

valu

e add

ed in

curre

nt

pric

e 33

.83%

(2

015/

16)

Dec

reas

e ov

er ti

me

BB

S

4 Po

A- C

IP1:

Wag

e diff

eren

tial b

etw

een

mal

es an

d fe

mal

es in

agric

ultu

re

33%

(201

5/16

) D

ecre

ase

over

tim

e B

BS

II. E

ffici

ent a

nd

nutr

ition

-sen

sitiv

e po

st-h

arve

st

tran

sfor

mat

ion

and

valu

e add

ition

5 7F

YP:

Ave

rage

ann

ual C

PI in

flatio

n ra

te

5.9%

(2

015/

16)

5.5%

by

2020

Ba

ngla

desh

Ban

k; N

atio

nal A

ccou

nt

Stat

istic

s, B

BS

6 Ch

ange

in w

ithou

t foo

d ag

ricul

tura

l wag

e rate

of m

ale ag

ricul

tura

l lab

our

tbd

tbd

(≥

real

GD

P/ca

p gr

owth

+0.

5)

Ban

glad

esh

Ban

k/D

AM

/BB

S

7 C

hang

e in

Foo

d Pr

ice

Ano

mal

ies

tbd

(201

6)D

ecre

ase

over

tim

eD

AM

, MoF

ood

III.

Impr

oved

di

etar

y di

vers

ity,

cons

umpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n

8 Po

A- C

IP1:

Nat

iona

l die

tary

ene

rgy

inta

ke fr

om c

erea

ls (%

) 70

% (H

IES

2010

) R

ecom

men

ded

60%

FA

O, W

HO

, BB

S

9 Po

A- C

IP1:

Pro

porti

on o

f chi

ldre

n re

ceiv

ing

min

imum

acce

ptab

le d

iet a

t 6-

23 m

onth

s of a

ge (%

) 23

% (2

014)

M

ore

than

40%

by

2025

(NPA

N2)

B

DH

S, U

ESD

, NPA

N2,

BD

HS,

M

oHFW

10

PoA-

CIP

1: P

ropo

rtion

of h

ouse

hold

s con

sum

ing

adeq

uate

ly io

dise

d sa

lt co

ntai

ning

at l

east

15

ppm

57

% (2

013

MIC

S)

90%

by

2025

(NPA

N2)

B

DH

S, N

MSS

11

Prev

alen

ce o

f ana

emia

am

ong

wom

en o

f rep

rodu

ctiv

e ag

e (1

5-49

) 39

.95%

(201

4 B

DH

S)

Less

than

25%

by

2025

(NPA

N2)

SO

FI, N

atio

nal M

icro

Nut

rient

St

atus

Sur

vey

2012

, FA

O, I

FAD

, U

NIC

EF, W

FP &

WH

O

12

Min

imum

Die

tary

Div

ersi

ty (M

DD

) for

wom

en

46%

(5 o

ut o

f 9

food

gro

ups,

2015

)

75%

by

2030

Th

is in

dica

tor h

as si

nce b

een

revi

sed

to

incl

ude

10 in

stea

d of

9 fo

od g

roup

s FA

O, I

NFS

, BB

S

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al

prot

ectio

n an

d sa

fety

net

s and

in

crea

sed

resil

ienc

e

13

7FY

P: P

ropo

rtion

of p

opul

atio

n liv

ing

belo

w n

atio

nal p

over

ty li

ne,

diff

eren

tiate

d by

urb

an a

nd ru

ral

(SD

G In

dica

tor 1

.2.1

: Pro

porti

on o

f pop

ulat

ion

livin

g be

low

the n

atio

nal

pove

rty li

ne, b

y se

x an

d ag

e)

Nat

iona

l:24.

3%

Rur

al: 2

6.4%

U

rban

: 18.

9%

(201

6)

18.6

% b

y 20

20 in

7FY

P H

IES

repo

rts, B

BS

14

Prop

ortio

n of

pop

ulat

ion

unde

r nat

iona

l ext

rem

e pov

erty

line

(a) R

ural

an

d (b

) Urb

an

Tota

l:12.

9%

Rur

al: 1

4.9%

U

rban

: 7.6

%

(201

6)

8% b

y 20

20

HIE

S re

ports

, BB

S

15

GoB

fina

ncia

l com

mitm

ents

to C

IP2

USD

5.6

bill

ion

USD

9.2

5 bi

llion

M

onito

ring

Rep

ort 2

019,

FPM

U

16

Esta

blis

hmen

t of h

igh-

leve

l FN

S fo

cal p

oint

s acr

oss c

ore

min

istri

es

1 5

effe

ctiv

e fun

ctio

ning

them

atic

team

s th

roug

h re

gula

r mee

tings

FP

MU

17

Proc

ess o

f est

ablis

hmen

t of F

NS

foca

l poi

nts e

ngag

ed in

pol

icy

mon

itorin

g is

ong

oing

thro

ugh

regu

lar T

T an

d TW

G m

eetin

gs

tbd

Mon

thly

mee

tings

FP

MU

18

Ann

ual h

igh-

leve

l FN

S po

licy

repo

rts p

rodu

ced

1 1

BN

NC

, CIP

2, S

UN

ann

ual r

epor

ts

V. S

tren

gthe

ned

enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent a

nd

cros

s-cu

ttin

g pr

ogra

mm

es fo

r ac

hiev

ing

food

and

nu

triti

on se

curi

ty


I. D

iver

sifie

d an

d su

stai

nabl

e ag

ricu

lture

, fis

heri

es a

nd

lives

tock

for

heal

thy

diet

s

I. Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets

I.1

Sustainable intensification and diversification of crop-based production systems

I.1.1

. Enh

ance

agr

icul

tura

l re

sear

ch a

nd k

now

ledg

e,

and

tech

nolo

gy

deve

lopm

ent f

or m

ore

prod

uctiv

e, d

iver

se,

sust

aina

ble

and

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

agr

icul

ture

I.1

.2. D

evelo

p te

chno

logi

es

incl

udin

g bi

otec

hnol

ogie

s an

d m

easu

res t

o ad

apt

agric

ultu

ral s

yste

ms t

o cl

imat

e ch

ange

I.1

.3. I

mpr

ove

and

expa

nd

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

exten

sion

prog

ram

mes

and

ag

ricul

tura

l adv

isor

y se

rvic

es

The

use

of

agric

ultu

ral l

and

to

prov

ide

affo

rdab

le

and

heal

thy

diet

s to

all i

s opt

imis

ed b

y en

hanc

ing

over

all

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd

grow

ing

high

val

ue

and

nutri

tious

cro

ps in

a

susta

inab

le w

ay th

at

is re

silie

nt to

clim

ate

chan

ge

1 7F

YP:

% o

f agr

icul

ture

bud

get a

lloca

ted

in th

e ag

ricul

tura

l res

earc

h 4.

2 (2

014-

15)

BARC

, BA

RI, B

RRI

, BJR

I, B

INA

, BSR

I, B

IRTA

N,

CD

B, S

RD

I

2 Po

A- C

IP1:

Ann

ual c

hang

e in

maj

or cr

ops'

prod

uctio

n

Ric

e 0.

0%

Whe

at 0

.0%

M

aize

7.7

%

Pota

to 2

.3%

Pu

lses

.0%

B

rinja

l 5.5

%

Pum

pkin

4.5

%

Bea

ns 5

.7%

La

l sha

k 4.

0%

Edib

le O

ilsee

ds 1

.8%

Ban

ana

2.6%

G

uava

4.6

%

Man

go 1

4.0%

Pi

neap

ple

2.7%

Ja

ckfr

uit -

2.8%

To

mat

oes t

bd

Car

rots

tbd

Lem

on tb

d Sw

eet p

otat

o tb

d (2

015-

16)

BBS

Stat

istic

al Y

earb

ooks

&

com

mun

icat

ions

with

B

BS

Agr

icul

tura

l Win

g

3D

irect

gen

der b

udge

ting

as %

of M

oA b

udge

t (re

vise

d)

tbd

Min

istry

of F

inan

ce B

udge

t

4 Po

A- C

IP1:

Num

ber o

f im

prov

ed n

ew v

arie

ties

rele

ased

Ric

e 10

W

heat

0

Mai

ze 2

Po

tato

10

Puls

es 6

V

eget

able

s 7

Edib

le O

ilsee

ds 2

Fr

uits

1(2

015/

16)

BR

RI,

BA

RI &

BIN

A,

MoA

5 Pr

oduc

tion

of se

eds t

oler

ant t

o sa

linity

, dro

ught

and

wat

er su

bmer

genc

e in

MT

M

oA A

PA In

dica

tor 2

.5

EXPE

CT

ED

AG

GR

EG

AT

E O

UT

PUT

S

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

e C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es (p

rior

ity

inte

rven

tions

) Pr

ogra

mm

e ex

pect

ed a

ggre

gate

ou

tput

Pr

oxy

indi

cato

rs

Bas

elin

e V

erifi

catio

n so

urce

s n.


EXPE

CT

ED

AG

GR

EG

AT

E O

UT

PUT

S

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

e C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es (p

rior

ity

inte

rven

tions

) Pr

ogra

mm

e ex

pect

ed a

ggre

gate

ou

tput

Pr

oxy

indi

cato

rs

Bas

elin

e V

erifi

catio

n so

urce

s n.


6 Po

A- C

IP1:

Num

ber o

f far

mer

s tra

ined

on

sust

aina

ble

agri

cultu

re p

ract

ices

by

DA

E

1,57

7,00

0 (2

015/

16)

DA

E, M

OA

7 N

umbe

r of i

nstit

utio

ns d

eliv

erin

g nu

tritio

n tra

inin

g ac

ross

cor

e m

inis

trie

s 3

(IPH

N, B

IRT

AN

, D

AE

)

BIR

TAN

, IPH

N, B

IRD

EM,

BA

RC

, MoW

CA

, BA

RD

, IN

FS

I.2

Improved access, quality and management of agricultural inputs, including water and land

I.2.1

. Enh

ance

ava

ilabi

lity

and

effi

cien

t use

of

affo

rdab

le a

nd q

ualit

y in

puts

(see

ds, f

ertil

iser

s,

pest

icid

es) a

nd c

redi

t for

sa

fe a

nd d

iver

sifi

ed c

rops

I.2

.2. P

rese

rve

agric

ultu

ral

land

ferti

lity

and

esta

blis

h la

nd ri

ghts

of m

ost

vuln

erab

le p

opul

atio

ns

I.2.3

. Im

prov

e w

ater

m

anag

emen

t thr

ough

co

nser

vatio

n, s

usta

inab

le

extra

ctio

n an

d di

strib

utio

n of

gro

und

wat

er a

nd

effi

cien

t use

of s

urfa

ce

wat

er fo

r irr

igat

ion

I.2.4

. Miti

gate

the

effe

cts o

f sa

line

wat

er in

trusi

on a

nd

its im

pact

on

food

pr

oduc

tion

and

impl

icat

ions

fo

r con

sum

ptio

n

Farm

ers

can

acce

ss

qual

ity a

gric

ultu

ral

inpu

ts m

ore

chea

ply

and

read

ily a

nd a

re

able

to m

anag

e th

eir

use

mor

e su

stai

nabl

y an

d ef

fici

ently

8 Po

A- C

IP1:

Ann

ual c

hang

e in

impr

oved

rice

, whe

at a

nd

mai

ze s

eeds

pro

duct

ion

-0.3

% (2

015/

16)

MoA

9 Po

A- C

IP1:

Impr

oved

see

ds s

uppl

y (B

AD

C, D

AE

&

priv

ate

com

pani

es) a

s %

of a

gron

omic

requ

irem

ents

Ric

e 41

.5

Whe

at 5

8.20

%

Mai

ze 2

7.10

%

Pota

to 7

.70%

Pu

lses

10.

90%

V

eget

able

s 50

.70%

E

dibl

e oi

lsee

ds

13.4

0%(2

015/

16)

MoA

10

Num

ber o

f soi

l sam

ples

ana

lyse

d to

upa

zila

and

uni

on

leve

ls

tbd

MoA

APA

Indi

cato

r 3.2

.1

11

Ara

ble

land

incr

ease

d by

exp

ansio

n of

min

or ir

rigat

ion

cove

rage

by e

ncou

ragi

ng o

ptim

al u

se o

f sur

face

wat

er,

and

incr

easin

g th

e are

a of a

rabl

e la

nd b

y re

duci

ng

wat

erlo

ggin

g an

d su

bmer

genc

e in

thou

sand

ha

42 (p

roje

cted

for

2015

/16)

M

oA A

PA In

dica

tor 2

.3.2

12

Dir

ect g

ende

r bud

getin

g as

% o

f MoW

R b

udge

t (r

evis

ed)

22.7

0% (2

016/

17)

Min

istry

of F

inan

ce B

udge

t

13

PoA

- CIP

1: S

uppl

y of

ure

a as

% o

f est

imat

ed

requ

irem

ents

97

.7 (2

014/

15)

M

oA, F

ertil

izer

Mon

itorin

g &

Man

agem

ent U

nit

14

PoA

- CIP

1: S

uppl

y of

MO

P as

% o

f est

imat

ed

requ

irem

ents

91

.4 (2

014/

15)

M

oA, F

ertil

izer

Mon

itorin

g &

Man

agem

ent U

nit

15

PoA

- CIP

1: S

uppl

y of

TSP

as

% o

f est

imat

ed

requ

irem

ents

tb

d

MoA

, Fer

tiliz

er M

onito

ring

& M

anag

emen

t Uni

t

16

PoA

- CIP

1: A

gric

ultu

ral c

redi

t dis

burs

emen

t in

billi

on

taka

17

6.5

(201

5/16

) B

angl

ades

h B

ank

Ann

ual

Rep

ort

17

Num

ber o

f sam

ples

of f

ish

feed

test

ed fo

r qua

lity

assu

ranc

e

2000

(pro

ject

ed fo

r 20

15/1

6)

MoF

L A

PA In

dica

tor 4

.5.1

.

18

Are

a of

land

aff

ecte

d by

sal

inis

atio

n tb

d SR

DI

19

Are

a of

land

und

er o

rgan

ic fa

rmin

g tb

d D

AE

SDG

indi

cato

r 5.a

.1 (a

) Pro

porti

on o

f tot

al a

gric

ultu

ral

popu

latio

n w

ith o

wne

rshi

p or

sec

ure

righ

ts o

ver

agri

cultu

ral l

and,

by

sex;

and

(b) s

hare

of w

omen

am

ong

owne

rs o

r rig

hts-

bear

ers

of a

gric

ultu

ral l

and,

by

type

of t

enur

e

To b

e pr

oduc

ed b

y B

BS,

A

gric

ultu

re C

ensu

s

SD

G in

dica

tor

6.4.

1 C

hang

e in

wat

er-u

se e

ffici

ency

ov

er ti

me

a) D

PHE,

LG

D b

) DoE

, M

oEF

c) D

AE, M

oA d

) W

ARPO

, MoW

R

SD

G in

dica

tor

6.4.

2 Le

vel o

f wat

er s

tres

s: fr

eshw

ater

w

ithdr

awal

as

a pr

opor

tion

of a

vaila

ble

fres

hwat

er

reso

urce

s

MoW

R m

ay c

alcu

late

the

indi

cato

r fro

m th

e av

aila

ble

data

in W

DB

I.3

Enhanced productivity and sustainable production of animal source foods

I.3.1

. Im

prov

e m

anag

emen

t of

fish

erie

s, li

vest

ock

and

poul

try

to in

crea

se

prod

uctio

n an

d pr

oduc

tivity

an

d nu

triti

onal

val

uew

hile

en

surin

g su

stai

nabi

lity

I.3.2

. Sus

tain

mic

ronu

trien

t-ric

h an

imal

food

pro

duct

ion

thro

ugh

cons

ervi

ng fi

sher

ies

and

lives

tock

bio

dive

rsity

I.3

.3. S

tren

gthe

n su

stai

nabl

e sh

rim

p aq

uacu

lture

, mar

ine

fishe

ries

and

farm

ing

syst

ems

adap

ted

to

geog

raph

ical

zon

es

I.3.4

. Im

prov

e fis

herie

s,

lives

tock

and

pou

ltry

heal

th

serv

ices

, qua

lity

inpu

ts a

nd

surv

eilla

nce

The

prod

uctio

n of

fo

ods

from

ani

mal

so

urce

is in

crea

sed

by

boos

ting

the

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd

prof

itabi

lity

of th

e fis

herie

s, a

quac

ultu

re

and

lives

tock

sec

tors

in

a s

usta

inab

le

man

ner

20

7FY

P: P

erce

ntag

e of

(a) c

oast

al a

nd (b

) mar

ine

area

s th

at a

re p

rote

cted

(a) 1

.22

(201

3-14

) (b

) 0.0

0 (2

013-

14)

DoF

, MoF

L

21

7FY

P: P

erce

ntag

e of

wet

land

and

natu

ral s

anct

uarie

s m

aint

aine

d 1.

7 (2

014-

15)

MoF

L

22

PoA

- CIP

1: A

nnua

l cha

nge

in q

uant

ity o

f fis

h pr

oduc

tion

5.2%

(201

5/16

) D

oF, M

oFL

23

PoA

- CIP

1: F

ishe

ry e

xpor

ts (v

alue

as

% o

f tot

al e

xpor

t; of

whi

ch s

hrim

p sh

are

in %

) (2

015/

16)

1.97

%

84.0

3%

DoF

, MoF

L

24

PoA

- CIP

1: G

DP

from

fish

ery

sect

or a

s %

of

agric

ultu

re G

DP

(exc

ludi

ng fo

rest

), at

con

stan

t pric

es

2005

/06

26.7

8% (2

015/

16)

BB

S

25

PoA

- CIP

1: P

rodu

ctio

n of

eg gs

(mill

ion)

, milk

(MT)

, ca

ttle

and

mea

t (M

T)

Eggs

(Mill

ion)

119

10M

ilk (M

illio

n M

T)

7.27

M

eat (

Mill

ion

MT)

6.

15(2

015/

16)

DLS

, MoF

L

26

PoA

- CIP

1: G

DP

from

live

stoc

k se

ctor

as

% o

f ag

ricul

ture

GD

P (e

xclu

ding

fore

st),

at c

onst

ant p

rices

20

05/0

6

14.2

1%(2

015/

16)

BB

S

27

Gro

wth

rate

of l

ives

tock

GD

P tb

d D

LS

28

Num

ber o

f dos

es o

f vac

cine

s pr

oduc

ed

tbd

DLS

29

PoA

-CIP

1: A

nnua

l cha

nge

in a

rtific

ial i

nsem

inat

ion

6.27

% (2

015/

16)

DLS

, MoF

L30

N

umbe

r of f

arm

ers

train

ed b

y th

e D

oF a

nd D

LS

tbd

MoF

L

31

Dire

ct g

ende

r bud

getin

g as

% o

f MoF

L bu

dget

(r

evis

ed)

tbd

Min

istry

of F

inan

ce B

udge

t

32

Num

ber o

f com

mer

cial

regi

ster

ed

1. p

oultr

y 2.

live

stoc

k 3.

fish

farm

s

1. tb

d 2.

tbd

3. tb

d M

oFL

and

BB

S

33

Num

ber o

f pon

ds

1.61

mill

ion

(201

4-20

15)

Fish

erie

s St

atis

tical

Rep

ort

of B

angl

ades

h

SD

G in

dica

tor 1

4.2.

1 Pr

opor

tion

of n

atio

nal e

xclu

sive

ec

onom

ic z

ones

man

aged

usi

ng e

cosy

stem

-bas

ed

appr

oach

es

DoE

afte

r enh

anci

ng it

s ca

paci

ties

to c

arry

out

su

rvey

s


EXPE

CT

ED

AG

GR

EG

AT

E O

UT

PUT

S

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

e C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es (p

rior

ity

inte

rven

tions

) Pr

ogra

mm

e ex

pect

ed a

ggre

gate

ou

tput

Pr

oxy

indi

cato

rs

Bas

elin

e V

erifi

catio

n so

urce

s n.

EXPE

CT

ED

AG

GR

EG

AT

E O

UT

PUT

S

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

e C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es (p

rior

ity

inte

rven

tions

) Pr

ogra

mm

e ex

pect

ed a

ggre

gate

ou

tput

Pr

oxy

indi

cato

rs

Bas

elin

e V

erifi

catio

n so

urce

s n.


II.1

Strengthened post-harvest value chain with particular focus on MSMEs (storage, processing, branding,

labelling, marketing and trade)

II.1.

1. D

evel

op sk

ills a

nd

stren

gthe

n ca

paci

ty to

pr

oces

s and

supp

ly sa

fe a

nd

nutri

ent-r

ich

food

s with

em

phas

is on

qua

lity

stand

ards

and

nut

rient

la

belli

ng in

form

atio

n

II.1.

2. A

dopt

app

ropr

iate

te

chno

logy

and

stre

ngth

en

infra

struc

ture

to a

llow

qu

ality

impr

ovem

ent,

valu

e ad

ditio

n an

d fo

rtific

atio

n of

fo

ods

II.1.

3. M

obili

se a

nd

prom

ote

prod

ucer

and

m

arke

ting

grou

ps fo

r im

prov

ed m

arke

t acc

ess a

nd

barg

aini

ng p

ower

, es

peci

ally

for w

omen

and

sm

allh

olde

rs

Food

val

ue c

hain

s are

de

velo

ped

cont

ribut

ing

to b

ette

r ac

cess

to n

utrit

ious

fo

od a

nd in

crea

sed

rura

l inc

omes

thro

ugh

the

crea

tion

of

empl

oym

ent

34

Num

ber o

f lar

ge e

stabl

ishm

ents

man

ufac

turin

g fo

od

167

(201

6)

BBS

Stat

istic

al Y

earb

ook

35

Num

ber o

f med

ium

, sm

all a

nd m

icro

esta

blish

men

ts m

anuf

actu

ring

food

16

,777

(201

6)

BBS

Stat

istic

al Y

earb

ook

36

PoA

- CIP

1: D

iffer

ence

bet

wee

n fa

rm g

ate

and

reta

il pr

ice

of se

lect

ed g

oods

Coar

se ri

ce 1

0%

Lent

il 55

.20%

O

nion

23.

60%

Po

tato

29.

10%

G

reen

chi

lli tb

d (2

015/

16)

DA

M, M

oA

37

Food

and

bev

erag

es e

xpor

ted

in m

illio

n Ta

ka

69,0

20 (2

015/

16)

BBS

Stat

istic

al

Yea

rboo

k/Ba

ngla

desh

Ban

k

38

Cove

rage

of a

gro-

busin

ess e

ntre

pren

eurs

hip

train

ing

by

the

Min

istry

of A

gric

ultu

re a

nd th

e M

inist

ry o

f In

dustr

ies (

BSCI

C), i

n th

ousa

nds

1,35

0 (p

roje

cted

val

ue

for 2

015/

16) f

or M

oA

MoA

APA

Indi

cato

r 4.

3.2.

+ M

oI A

PA

II.2

Improved access to markets, facilities and information

II.2.

1. Im

prov

e m

arke

t in

frastr

uctu

res,

phys

ical

ac

cess

to m

arke

t fac

ilitie

s II.

2.2.

Stre

ngth

en p

rivat

e se

ctor

par

ticip

atio

n an

d pu

blic

priv

ate

partn

ersh

ips

II.2.

3. S

cale

-up

info

rmat

ion

diss

emin

atio

n in

clud

ing

the

esta

blish

men

t of I

CT fa

cilit

ies

Food

pro

duce

rs a

nd

proc

esso

rs a

re a

ble

to

use

mar

kets

mor

e ef

ficie

ntly

39

7FY

P: U

pazi

la a

nd U

nion

Roa

d ne

twor

k in

goo

d an

d fa

ir co

nditi

on (S

DG

indi

cato

r 9.1

.1 P

ropo

rtion

of t

he

rura

l pop

ulat

ion

who

live

with

in 2

km

of a

n al

l-sea

son

road

)

33%

(2

014)

LG

ED

40

Num

ber o

f gro

wth

cen

ters

, rur

al m

arke

ts, w

omen

m

arke

t cen

ters

, and

Uni

on P

arish

ad C

ompl

exes

de

velo

ped

by L

GED

and

DA

M

390

(201

5/16

) LG

ED M

&E

DA

M

41

Cold

stor

age

avai

labl

e in

thou

sand

MT

4000

(201

5/16

) BB

S St

atist

ical

Yea

rboo

k

42

Num

ber o

f Dig

ital C

ente

rs a

cros

s the

cou

ntry

at

natio

nal a

nd su

b-na

tiona

l lev

els

tbd

Min

istry

of I

CTs

43

Num

ber o

f foo

d, m

arke

t and

infra

struc

ture

PPP

co

ntra

cts a

war

ded

(201

5) b

y th

e PP

P au

thor

ity

2 (2

015)

Ann

ual R

epor

t 201

5/16

, Pu

blic

Priv

ate

Partn

ersh

ip

Aut

horit

y, P

rime

Min

ister

’s

Offi

ce

44Ch

ange

in fo

od p

rice

anom

alie

s tb

d (2

016)

DA

M, M

oFoo

d


EXPE

CT

ED

AG

GR

EG

AT

E O

UT

PUT

S

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

e C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es (p

rior

ity

inte

rven

tions

) Pr

ogra

mm

e ex

pect

ed a

ggre

gate

ou

tput

Pr

oxy

indi

cato

rs

Bas

elin

e V

erifi

catio

n so

urce

s n.


III.1

Enhanced nutrition knowledge, promotion of good practices, and consumption of safe and nutritious diets

III.1

.1 S

cale

up

nutri

tion

train

ing,

beh

avio

ur c

hang

e co

mm

unic

atio

ns (B

CC) f

or

enha

nced

kno

wle

dge,

safe

sto

rage

, hou

seho

ld p

roce

ssin

g an

d im

prov

ed c

onsu

mpt

ion

III

.1.2

. Pre

vent

and

con

trol

non-

com

mun

icab

le d

iseas

es

(NCD

s) a

nd e

nsur

e he

alth

y di

ets t

hrou

gh p

rom

otio

n of

di

etar

y gu

idel

ines

link

ed w

ith

natio

nal N

CD

stra

tegi

es a

nd

rela

ted

nutri

tion

serv

ices

III

.1.3

. Kno

wle

dge

base

d to

ols

and

rese

arch

on

the

deve

lopm

ent a

nd p

rom

otio

n of

nut

rient

den

se re

cipe

s us

ing

loca

l foo

ds fo

r en

hanc

ing

dive

rsifi

ed fo

od

cons

umpt

ion

to re

duce

stu

ntin

g, w

astin

g an

d m

icro

nutri

ent d

efic

ienc

ies

Nut

ritio

n an

d he

alth

ar

e im

prov

ed

thro

ugh

inte

grat

ed

shor

t and

long

-term

in

terv

entio

ns

45

7FY

P: P

ropo

rtion

of c

hild

ren

unde

r 6 m

onth

s who

are

ex

clus

ivel

y br

eastf

ed (%

) 55

.3 (2

014

BD

HS)

N

IPO

RT

BD

HS

46

PoA

- CIP

1: S

hare

of t

otal

die

tary

ene

rgy

supp

ly fo

r co

nsum

ptio

n fro

m c

erea

l and

non

-cer

eal

78%

cer

eals

22

% n

on-c

erea

ls FB

S FA

O 2

014,

BBS

47

Dire

ct g

ende

r bud

getin

g as

% o

f MoF

ood

budg

et

5.89

% (2

016/

17)

Min

istry

of F

inan

ce

Budg

et

48

PoA

- CIP

1: P

oor h

ouse

hold

s rai

sing

hom

e ga

rden

ing

and

back

yard

pou

ltry

in se

lect

ed v

ulne

rabl

e di

stric

ts 49

% (2

014/

15)

BBS

49

Prev

alen

ce o

f dia

betic

cas

es

9.2%

(201

4)

BDH

S, N

NS,

IPH

N,

DG

HS

50

PoA

- CIP

1: N

umbe

r of m

ass m

edia

act

iviti

es fo

r nu

tritio

n BC

C tb

d H

ealth

Bul

letin

/ D

GH

S/O

ther

sect

ors

51

Num

ber o

f ins

titut

ions

pro

mot

ing

diet

ary

guid

elin

es

3 (B

IRD

EM, I

PHN

, FP

MU

)

III.2

Optimised food utilisation through provision of safe water, improved

food hygiene and sanitation

III.2

.1. S

cale

up

the

supp

ly o

f sa

fe w

ater

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

dom

estic

use

III

.2.2

. Ens

ure

hygi

enic

food

ha

ndlin

g, p

repa

ratio

n an

d se

rvic

es, a

nd sc

ale-

up h

and

was

hing

beh

avio

ur

III.2

.3.

Impr

ove

sani

tary

fa

cilit

ies a

nd p

ract

ices

-in

clud

ing

the

prev

entio

n of

an

imal

cro

ss-c

onta

min

atio

n-

for r

educ

ing

diar

rhea

l and

fo

od b

orne

illn

ess a

nd c

hild

un

dern

utrit

ion

Mea

sure

s are

take

n to

opt

imise

the

use

of th

e nu

tritio

nal

pote

ntia

l of f

ood

52

7FY

P: P

erce

ntag

e of

urb

an a

nd ru

ral p

opul

atio

n w

ith

acce

ss to

safe

drin

king

wat

er (a

. Urb

an, b

. Rur

al) [

SDG

in

dica

tor 6

.1.1

Pro

porti

on o

f pop

ulat

ion

usin

g sa

fely

m

anag

ed d

rinki

ng w

ater

serv

ices

]

a) 9

9.4

b) 9

8.2

(SV

RS 2

013)

BBS,

SV

RS,

MoH

FW, M

oFoo

d

MIC

S D

PHE

53

7FY

P: P

erce

ntag

e of

urb

an a

nd ru

ral p

opul

atio

n w

ith

acce

ss to

sani

tary

latri

nes (

a. U

rban

, b. R

ural

) [SD

G

indi

cato

r 6.2

.1 P

ropo

rtion

of p

opul

atio

n us

ing

safe

ly

man

aged

sani

tatio

n se

rvic

es, i

nclu

ding

a h

and-

was

hing

fa

cilit

y w

ith so

ap a

nd w

ater

]

a) 5

9.7

b) 6

6.2

(SV

RS 2

013)

BBS,

SV

RS,

MIC

S of

D

PHE

54

Num

ber o

f chi

ldre

n ag

ed 5

yea

rs o

r les

s adm

itted

in

upaz

ila h

ealth

com

plex

es, a

t the

dist

rict-l

evel

seco

ndar

y ho

spita

ls an

d in

med

ical

col

lege

hos

pita

ls fo

r dia

rrhea

an

d ga

stroe

nter

itis o

f inf

ectio

us o

rigin

148,

078

(201

5)

DG

HS,

Hea

lth B

ulle

tin


EXPE

CT

ED

AG

GR

EG

AT

E O

UT

PUT

S

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

e C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es (p

rior

ity

inte

rven

tions

) Pr

ogra

mm

e ex

pect

ed a

ggre

gate

ou

tput

Pr

oxy

indi

cato

rs

Bas

elin

e V

erifi

catio

n so

urce

s n.


IV.1

Timely and effective disaster preparedness and responses through emergency food distribution,

steps towards agricultural sector rehabilitation and mitigation measures

IV.1

.1. I

ncre

ase

the

resil

ienc

e of

agr

icul

tura

l sy

stem

s, in

clud

ing

the

prod

uctio

n of

disa

ster-

resil

ient

nut

ritio

us c

rops

es

peci

ally

by

vuln

erab

le

popu

latio

ns

IV.1

.2. E

nsur

e so

cial

and

ec

onom

ic a

cces

s to

food

fo

r the

poo

rest

sect

ions

of

the

popu

latio

n in

tim

es o

f cr

isis a

nd in

are

as m

ost

affe

cted

by

disa

ster

IV.1

.3. S

cale

-up

mod

ern

food

stor

age

faci

litie

s for

im

prov

ed P

ublic

Foo

d D

istrib

utio

n Sy

stem

pa

rticu

larly

in d

isaste

r-pr

one

area

s

Syste

ms a

re in

pla

ce

to p

rote

ct v

ulne

rabl

e gr

oups

' foo

d se

curit

y du

ring

and

afte

r di

saste

rs

55

7FY

P: N

umbe

r of u

sabl

e cy

clon

e sh

elte

rs

3847

(201

4)

DD

M/L

GED

56

7FY

P: N

umbe

r of r

ural

com

mun

ities

with

disa

ster

resil

ient

hab

itats

and

com

mun

ities

’ ass

ets

1800

0 (2

013)

D

DM

57

Mon

th o

f ade

quat

e ho

useh

old

food

pro

visio

ning

tb

d Ba

ngla

desh

Disa

ster

rela

ted

Stat

istic

s 201

5,

BBS

58

Dire

ct g

ende

r bud

getin

g as

% o

f MoD

MR

bud

get

23.1

3% (2

016/

17)

Min

istry

of F

inan

ce

Budg

et

59

PoA

- CIP

1: E

ffect

ive

grai

n sto

rage

cap

acity

at c

lose

of

fisca

l yea

r 18

70 (2

015/

16)

IDTS

of F

ood

Dire

ctor

ate

60

PoA

- CIP

1: A

vera

ge u

se o

f effe

ctiv

e G

oB fo

od g

rain

sto

rage

cap

acity

75

%

MIS

M, F

ood

Dire

ctor

ate

61

Act

ual c

losin

g sto

cks %

of b

udge

t tar

get

52

Nat

iona

l Bud

get &

FPM

U

Stoc

k Fl

ow T

able

62

Envi

ronm

ent C

IP: E

arly

war

ning

info

rmat

ion

enha

nced

th

roug

h Re

gion

al a

nd G

loba

l Ini

tiativ

es (M

oUs a

nd

LoA

s)

4

IV.2

Strengthened social protection and safety net programmes for targeted groups across the life cycle including

disabled and displaced population

IV.2

.1. E

xpan

d an

d str

engt

hen

safe

ty n

et

prog

ram

mes

acr

oss t

he

life

cycl

e su

ppor

ting

vuln

erab

le g

roup

s suc

h as

po

or w

omen

, chi

ldre

n, th

e el

derly

, disa

bled

peo

ple

and

disp

lace

d po

pula

tions

IV.2

.2. E

xpan

d an

d str

engt

hen

prog

ram

mes

fo

r sup

porti

ng p

eopl

e liv

ing

in v

ulne

rabl

e an

d di

sadv

anta

ged

area

s (ch

ar

land

, riv

er b

ank,

hao

rs,

hill

tract

s and

urb

an a

reas

)IV

.2.3

. Int

rodu

cenu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve so

cial

sa

fety

net

pro

gram

mes

(S

SNP)

incl

udin

g fo

od

forti

ficat

ion

espe

cial

ly fo

r m

othe

rs a

nd c

hild

ren

Effe

ctiv

enes

s, ta

rget

ing

and

cont

ent

of so

cial

safe

ty n

et

prog

ram

mes

are

im

prov

ed to

pro

vide

be

tter p

rote

ctio

n to

di

ffere

nt v

ulne

rabl

e gr

oups

63

PoA

- CIP

1: B

udge

ted

cove

rage

of V

GF

(lakh

per

son)

an

d V

GD

(lak

h pe

rson

mon

th)

VG

F (la

kh p

erso

n)

64.7

2 V

GD

(lak

h pe

rson

m

onth

) 91.

33

Min

istry

of F

inan

ce

Budg

et

MoE

FC

64

PoA

- CIP

1: Q

uant

ity o

f VG

F an

d G

R di

strib

uted

(in

thou

sand

MT)

42

8 M

ISM

, DG

Foo

d

65

PoA

- CIP

1: S

afet

y ne

t pro

gram

mes

exp

endi

ture

s as %

of

GD

P [S

DG

indi

cato

r 1.3

.1. P

ropo

rtion

of p

opul

atio

n co

vere

d by

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n flo

ors/s

yste

ms,

by se

x,

disti

ngui

shin

g ch

ildre

n, u

nem

ploy

ed p

erso

ns, o

lder

pe

rson

s, pe

rson

s with

disa

bilit

ies,

preg

nant

wom

en,

new

born

s, w

ork

inju

ry v

ictim

s and

the

poor

and

the

vuln

erab

le]

1.46

% (2

015/

16)

Fina

nce

Div

ision

, M

inist

ry o

f Fin

ance

66

Num

ber o

f chi

ldre

n co

vere

d by

the

Scho

ol F

eedi

ng

Prog

ram

s in

Pove

rty P

rone

Are

as (i

n te

ns o

f tho

usan

ds)

24.4

(201

6)

Min

istry

of F

inan

ce/G

ED

67

Cove

rage

of p

eopl

e co

vere

d by

the

Allo

wan

ce fo

r the

Fi

nanc

ially

Inso

lven

t Disa

bled

(in

tens

of t

hous

ands

) tb

d M

inist

ry o

f Fin

ance

/GED

68

Cove

rage

of O

ld A

ge A

llow

ance

/Pen

sion

(in te

ns o

f th

ousa

nds)

tb

d M

inist

ry o

f Fin

ance

/GED

69

Budg

eted

cov

erag

e of

em

ploy

men

t gen

erat

ion

prog

ram

me

for t

he p

oor (

in la

kh p

erso

n m

onth

) 44

(201

6)

MoD

MR


EXPE

CT

ED

AG

GR

EG

AT

E O

UT

PUT

S

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

e

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e

Sub-

prog

ram

mes

(pri

ority

in

terv

entio

ns)

Prog

ram

me

expe

cted

agg

rega

te

outp

ut

Prox

y in

dica

tors

B

asel

ine

Verif

icatio

n so

urce

s n.


BIRT

AN

star

ted

diss

emin

atio

n th

roug

h ag

ricul

ture

ex

tens

ion

serv

ices

(2

014/

15)


V.1

Improved food safety, quality control and assurance,

awareness on food safety and hygiene

V.1

.1. E

nsur

e co

nfor

mity

of f

oods

for

cons

umpt

ion

thro

ugh

accr

edita

tion

from

ce

rtific

atio

n ag

enci

es, i

nspe

ctio

n an

d la

bora

tory

serv

ices

V

.1.2

. Int

rodu

ce a

nd p

opul

arise

Goo

d A

gric

ultu

ral P

ract

ices

, Goo

d A

qua-

cultu

ral P

ract

ices

and

Goo

d H

usba

ndry

Pr

actic

es th

at e

nsur

e fo

od sa

fety

and

qu

ality

V

.1.3

. Int

rodu

ce a

nd sc

ale-

up g

ood

man

ufac

turin

g pr

actic

es (G

MP)

and

goo

d hy

gien

ic p

ract

ices

(GH

P) in

clud

ing

adhe

renc

e to

Haz

ard

Ana

lysis

and

Crit

ical

Co

ntro

l Poi

nts (

HA

CCP)

com

plia

nce

Food

safe

ty is

impr

oved

th

roug

h th

e in

trodu

ctio

n of

go

od p

ract

ices

at al

l ste

ps o

f the

fo

od su

pply

cha

in

com

plem

ente

d by

aw

aren

ess

raisi

ng a

nd m

easu

res t

o en

sure

th

e co

nfor

mity

of f

oods

for

cons

umpt

ion

70

7FY

P: P

erce

ntag

e of

urb

an so

lid w

aste

re

gula

rly c

olle

cted

tb

d LG

D,

MoL

GR

D&

C,

City

Cor

pora

tion

71

Farm

ers t

rain

ed o

n us

e of

org

anic

ferti

liser

, gr

een

ferti

liser

and

mic

robi

al fe

rtilis

er, i

n th

ousa

nds

800

(pro

jecte

d va

lue

2015

/16)

MoA

APA

In

dica

tor 3

.3.1

, D

AE

72

Num

ber o

f foo

d sa

fety

man

agem

ent s

yste

m

certi

ficat

es a

war

ded

by B

STI

tbd

BSTI

, MoI

, BA

B

73

Num

ber o

f foo

d ite

ms s

tand

ardi

sed

by B

STI

tbd

BSTI

, MoI

, BF

SA, I

PH

74

Iden

tifie

d nu

mbe

r of v

iola

tion

of fo

od sa

fety

sta

ndar

d re

porte

d by

BFS

Atb

d M

oFL

APA

In

dica

tor 3

.5.1

75

Num

ber o

f HA

CCP/

ISM

S ce

rtifie

d in

stitu

tions

tb

d M

oI, B

AB,

BST

I, BA

RC, I

PH

76

Num

ber o

f cou

rses

del

iver

ed o

n G

AP,

GH

P an

d G

MP

tbd

MoA

, MoI

, BFS

A

77

Num

ber o

f tra

inee

s tha

t hav

e be

nefit

ed fr

om

train

ing

on G

AP,

GH

P an

d G

MP

tbd

MoA

, MoI

, BFS

A

78

Num

ber o

f foo

d sa

fety

initi

ativ

es /d

ays

obse

rved

tb

d BF

SA, I

PH

V.2

Reduced food losses and waste

V.2

.1. I

mpr

ove

met

hods

of m

easu

ring

food

loss

es a

nd im

plem

ent a

ppro

pria

te

mea

sure

s to

min

imise

food

loss

es at

farm

le

vel

V.2

.2. S

treng

then

capa

city

in p

ost-h

arve

st ha

ndlin

g te

chno

logy

and

infra

struc

ture

(tr

ansp

ort,

pack

agin

g, st

orag

e)

V.2

.3. R

educ

e w

asta

ge a

nd

qual

ity/q

uant

ity lo

ss o

f foo

d pr

oduc

ts at

al

l sta

ges o

f mar

ketin

g an

d co

nsum

ptio

n

Food

loss

es a

nd w

aste

are

m

inim

ised

thro

ugho

ut th

e pr

oduc

tion

chai

n do

wn

to

cons

umpt

ion

by h

ouse

hold

s

79

Was

tage

as a

pro

porti

on o

f agr

icul

tura

l pr

oduc

e, in

clud

ing

sect

or sp

ecifi

c pro

porti

ons

in B

angl

ades

h tb

d M

oFoo

d, M

oA,

MoF

L, M

oI

V.3

Improved information and data for evidence-based monitoring and adjustment of policies and

programmes

V.3

.1. P

rodu

ce m

ore

relia

ble

and

timel

y FN

S in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta th

roug

h im

prov

ed in

form

atio

n in

frastr

uctu

res,

enha

nced

coo

rdin

atio

n in

dat

a co

llect

ion

and

data

exc

hang

e to

impr

ove

evid

ence

-ba

sed

deci

sion

mak

ing,

pol

icy

form

ulat

ion

and

prog

ram

min

g

FNS-

rela

ted

deci

sions

are b

ased

on

evi

denc

e an

d hi

gh-q

ualit

y,

timel

y an

d co

mpr

ehen

sive f

ood

secu

rity

and

nutri

tion

anal

ysis

that

dra

ws o

n da

ta a

nd

info

rmat

ion

avai

labl

e in

the

netw

ork

of e

xisti

ng se

ctor

and

sta

keho

lder

info

rmat

ion

syste

ms

80

PoA

- CIP

1: E

xisti

ng fo

od se

curit

y an

d nu

tritio

n da

taba

ses/s

urve

illan

ce sy

stem

s

FSN

SP, N

IP,

NIS

(2

014/

15)

FPM

U

81

PoA

- CIP

1:

Food

Com

posit

ion

Tabl

es (F

CT) u

pdat

ed/

diss

emin

ated

INFS

/CA

RS/

D

U/F

PMU

/

NFP

CSP

FA

O/

INFO

OD

S/IP

HN

EXPE

CT

ED

AG

GR

EG

AT

E O

UT

PUT

S

Exp

ecte

d ou

tcom

e C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es (p

rior

ity

inte

rven

tions

)

Prog

ram

me

expe

cted

agg

rega

te

outp

ut

Prox

y in

dica

tors

B

asel

ine

Ver

ifica

tion

sour

ces

n.

V.4

V.4

.1. S

treng

then

exi

sting

nat

iona

l co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

s lia

ising

with

ex

istin

g FN

S fra

mew

orks

, clu

sters

and

ne

twor

ks in

clud

ing

the

SUN

initi

ativ

e an

d ne

twor

ks w

orki

ng to

war

ds in

tegr

atin

g th

e Ri

ght t

o Fo

od to

the

Cons

titut

ion

V.4

.2. S

treng

then

cap

aciti

es to

des

ign

and

mon

itor t

he n

ew F

ood

and

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y Po

licy

and

impl

emen

t, m

onito

r an

d co

ordi

nate

the

CIP2

Nat

iona

l cap

aciti

es to

des

ign

and

impl

emen

t and

mon

itor

polic

ies,

inve

stmen

t pla

ns,

prog

ram

mes

and

lega

l fra

mew

orks

are

enh

ance

d

82

PoA

- CIP

1: C

IP M

onito

ring

Repo

rts

prod

uced

Pr

oduc

ed

(201

5/16

) FP

MU

83

PoA

- CIP

1: A

dditi

onal

reso

urce

s mob

ilise

d fo

r the

CIP

2 in

mill

ion

USD

1,

313

FPM

U

84

PoA

- CIP

1: In

crea

se in

ong

oing

pro

ject

s (n

umbe

r and

val

ue)

Num

ber 5

0 V

alue

(mill

ion

USD

) 137

(201

5/16

) FP

MU

85

SUN

inde

x fo

r 'Br

ingi

ng p

eopl

e to

geth

er in

to

a sh

ared

spac

e fo

r act

ion'

54

% (2

016)

SU

N A

nnua

l Pr

ogre

ss R

epor

t 20

16

86

Righ

t to

Food

issu

es d

iscus

sed

by p

olic

y m

aker

s and

at P

arlia

men

tary

leve

lN

o (2

015/

16)

FPM

U

Strengthened FNS governance, capacity strengthening and

leadership across FNS relevant stakeholders


11. Cost and financingIn line with the CIP1, cost and financing requirements of the CIP2 are estimated based on:

1. an estimate of available financing of CIP activities from ongoing investment activities financed by the Government and DPs;

2. additional funds required based on the needs to achieve the CIP2 results and outcomes described in Section 10;

3. a priority ranking of different projects based on their relevance to nutrition.

A more detailed version of this section with a more extensive description of the data used and method, and an inventory of the projects included in the CIP2 can be found in Annex 5.

What is included in the CIP2 and what is not

The CIP2 includes public investments between July 2016 and June 2020, i.e. investments channelled through the ADP, which is the government process used to allocate resources on an annual basis in support of investments from existing budget sources and DP contributions.

While the food systems approach adopted in the CIP2 (see Section 4) means the breadth of elements and interconnections considered is extensive, not all investments that can potentially affect food and nutri-tion security can be included as in some cases, other mechanisms and planning tools are more appropri-ate. Thus, the following are specifically excluded from the CIP2 to avoid duplications and set bounda-ries to its remit:

• purely policy and legal measures - the CIP is a means to implement existing policies;• the distribution of food through the Public Food Distribution System and all safety net

programmes which represented 9.55% in 2015/16 of total government spending34, unless they are considered as investments and therefore appear in the ADP35. The CIP2 however does advo-cate for investments to enhance access to nutrition-sensitive social protection and safety nets and increased resilience;

• subsidies for agricultural inputs, i.e. fertilisers, which are covered by regular budgetary means;• direct transfers from DPs to implementers not linked to the Annual Development Programme;• family planning activities which is the responsibility of public health planning;• private investment, although one important objective of the CIP2 is to finance public goods to

stimulate investment by smallholder producers and leverage private investment through the promotion of PPPs. Projects under the CIP2 may therefore enable the creation of PPPs through the provision of technical assistance for their development, and facilitate their operations.

While all investments undertaken by the Government are channelled through the ADP, only part of the DP contribution is. The part that is not channelled through the ADP, such as finance to NGOs to under-take certain activities, is therefore not included in the CIP2.

Finally, because the CIP2 is about nutrition-sensitive food systems, the focus is on projects that are nutrition-sensitive or nutrition-supportive, rather than nutrition-specific which is the purview of the NPAN2.

This cost exercise therefore provides an estimate of:1. the ongoing investments reclassified according to the 13 programmes and 39 sub-programmes;2. the existing available resources already committed through the ADP, including those financed

by the budget and by the DPs; 3. the financial gap to be filled.

34This figure does not include social empowerment projects which would bring this percentage to 13.6% of the total GoB budget.35This might be the case of employment and income generating safety nets.


Two types of figures will be provided: totals and figures ‘prioritised’ according to their role in address-ing FNS, as explained below.

Identification of projects The Government’s ADP was systematically scrutinised for ongoing projects relevant to the CIP2 programmes. The Planning Commission formulates the ADP in light of the objectives defined in the Five-Year Plan on which the CIP2 is aligned. It is the budgetary tool used to allocate resources on an annual basis in support of investment i.e. excluding current expenditures. IMED documents then provide the financial information required for the CIP2 budgeting, namely: the total project budget, the residual budget for the CIP2 and the yearly expenditure. This information is provided disaggregated by source i.e. Government and development partner.

The ADP book also lists pipeline projects which are required to calculate the CIP2 financing gap. In some cases, this information was not included in this document but provided by relevant members of the Government.

The exchange rate used for calculation is US$ 1 = 78.4 Taka36.

All ongoing and planned interventions of GoB agencies and DPs relevant to the CIP2 are mapped in Annex 5.

Classification of projects

Over two hundred ongoing projects and over 100 planned interventions37 were identified to be included in the CIP2. Each of these was scrutinised to decide which programme and sub-programme they should be classified under. In some cases, projects have several components, some of which fall under different sub-programmes, or some of which are not relevant to the CIP2. In such instances, when available, the budget allocated to each component was used to apportion the component to the relevant sub-pro-grammes. In cases where the budget by component was not available, the proportion allocated under each sub-programme was calculated by weighting all identifiable components equally. Efforts have been made to obtain more detailed information from managers or other stakeholders in ambiguous cases, but responses were not always obtained. Further versions of the CIP2 will endeavour to refine this information.

The classification of CIP2 projects according to the programmes and sub-programmes identified based on priorities expressed by stakeholders was assisted by the MAFAP (Monitoring and Analysing Food and Agricultural Policies) programme. This programme is implemented by FAO and seeks to establish country-owned and sustainable systems to monitor, analyse, and reform food and agricultural policies to enable more effective, efficient and inclusive policy frameworks in developing and emerging econo-mies. The methodology used by MAFAP can provide useful insights into the composition of public investments in the CIP2.

Prioritisation

Because the focus of the CIP2 is on nutrition-sensitive food systems, two budgets are provided. One with the full amount of the ongoing and pipeline expenditures and another where these expenditures have been prioritised based on the extent to which projects are bound to have a role in achieving positive nutritional outcomes, with weights associated to their potential impact. This type of analysis advocated by the SUN initiative allows the tracking of resources contributing to nutrition which can help countries prioritise, better plan their resource allocations and advocate for increasing funding.

36This is the Bangladesh Bank exchange rate for July 2016, the beginning of the CIP2. 37The word intervention rather than project has been used as some planned ventures are yet to be shaped into actual projects.


Based on the 2013 Lancet series on Maternal and Child Nutrition, the SUN proposes to classify projects into two groups:

- nutrition-specific: high-impact nutrition actions that aim to address immediate and some inter-mediate causes of malnutrition and undernutrition such as dietary intake and feeding practices.

- nutrition-sensitive: projects that incorporate nutrition objectives to address critical underlying determinants of undernutrition. Nutrition-sensitive approaches include agriculture; clean water and sanitation; food safety; food losses and waste; education and employment; healthcare; support for resilience and women’s empowerment.

For the purpose of the CIP2, three categories of projects are considered: - ‘nutrition-sensitive +’: certain interventions categorised by the Lancet as nutrition-sensitive are

likely to have a more direct impact on nutritional outcomes e.g. promotion of dietary guidelines linked with national NCD strategies and related nutrition services. They have the potential to be leveraged to serve as delivery platforms for nutrition-specific interventions. They are given a greater weight in the nutrition budget given their more direct impact;

- nutrition-sensitive;- nutrition-supportive: this third category is created for projects that craft an environment that is

necessary for nutrition-sensitive or nutrition-specific projects to take place. This is not usually considered in nutrition budgets and yet bears a crucial role, albeit indirect, in the achievement of positive nutritional outcomes. Examples of this are the construction of infrastructure such as roads which will allow access to markets. It is also the case of strengthening of capacities to implement FNS-related policies. Such interventions are often sector-wide in nature which justi-fies not including their full cost under the CIP2.

The category attributed to each project is indicated in the inventory of projects provided in Table A5.5 of Annex 5. Weights are attributed to each type of project, yielding a nutrition-sensitive CIP2 budget. These weights are as follows:

- 100% for ‘nutrition-sensitive +’ projects- 75% for nutrition-sensitive projects- 50% for nutrition-supportive projects.

These numbers have been selected to be able to prioritise the CIP2 according to its nutrition orientation but have no justification other than wanting to create a hierarchy in the degree of relevance to nutrition. Such exercises have been carried out in other countries, but the breadth of values chosen reflects the arbitrariness of such endeavour. For example, drinking water supply projects have been given a weight ranging from 10% to 100% in different country scenarios38.

Estimates

The CIP2 is estimated at a total of US$ 9.25 billion as of June 2016, USD$ 3.6 billion of which are pipe-line projects for which funds need to be mobilised. DPs contribute to 38.8% of the ongoing projects (Table 5). When weighing the budget according to its nutrition sensitivity, its total declines to US$ 5.6 billion, or by 43%, and the financing gap to US$ 2.4 billion, or by 34% (Table 6). The lower proportion-al decline for the pipeline projects compared to the ongoing projects indicates the planned projects have a greater nutrition focus or a less nutrition-supportive nature than the operationalised projects.

38 As reported by SUN (2017) Budget analysis for nutrition: a guidance note for countries


Even after giving greater weight to nutrition-sensitive projects, the overall CIP2 budget is highly biased towards Pillar I ‘Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets’ as shown in Figure 5. This propensity is even more evident when measured by the nutrition weighting. While it reflects the country’s focus on developing agriculture to respond to the ever-increasing food requirements, it is also attributed to the fact that projects needed under this pillar are often costly. The development by Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation (BCIC) of a fertiliser factory alone costs over a billion US dollars. Projects related to irrigation which fall under this pillar also require substan-tial amounts of funding. The small share of Pillar III ‘Improved dietary diversity, consump-tion and utilisation’ is explained by the fact that many projects falling under this category are nutri-tion-specific, therefore falling outside the remit of the CIP2. However, it is a clear indication that more efforts are needed in this area to support the NPAN2 through nutrition-sensitive projects, espe-cially given that nutrition-sensitive programmes can serve as delivery platforms for nutrition-specif-ic interventions, potentially increasing their scale, coverage, and effectiveness (see the Lancet series on Maternal and Child Nutrition, 2013).

The fact that Pillar V ‘Strengthened enabling environment and cross-cutting programmes for achieving food and nutrition security’ only represents 3% of the public investment highlights the need for an urgent mobilisation of funds especially for programmes V.1. and V.2. on ‘Improved food safety, quality control and assurance, awareness on food safety and hygiene’ and ‘Reduced food losses and waste’ which are essential to attain FNS targets and require significant investments.

The MAFAP classification shown in Figure 6 shows a functional decomposition of the nutri-tion-weight-ed CIP2 budget according to the economic characteristics of the expenditures. Information on the com-position of the expenditure can be a useful tool for policy makers to further analyse the com-position of their investments in FNS. Specifically, in the case of the CIP2, roads, irrigation, water and flood man-agement, payments to suppliers -mostly investments on fertiliser factories- account for over half of the nutrition-weighted CIP2 expenditure.

This is further illustrated by Table 7, which shows that over half of the CIP2 budget is allocated to nutri-tion-supportive projects. While such endeavours are necessary to bring about the changes needed, the Government will need to refocus its own and DPs’ spending priorities towards nutri-tion-sensitive projects if it wants to achieve the CIP2’s goals.



Tab

le 5

. CIP

2 to

tal,

exis

ting

res

ourc

es a

nd a

ddit

iona

l fin

anci

ng r

equi

red,

as

of J

une

2016

(in

mill

ion

US$

)

CIP

2 Pr

ogra

mm

es b

y pi

llar

Tot

al C

IP2

Tot

al e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s F

inan

cing

gap

T

otal

GoB

DPs

I. D

iver

sifie

d an

d su

stai

nabl

e ag

ricu

lture

, fis

heri

es a

nd li

vest

ock

for

heal

thy

diet

s 3,

815.

3 1,

632.

9 1,

312.

5 32

0.4

2,18

2.4

I.1. S

usta

inab

le in

tens

ifica

tion

and

dive

rsifi

catio

n of

cro

p-ba

sed

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

s 62

2.1

184.

0 14

7.4

36.6

43

8.1

I.2. I

mpr

oved

acc

ess,

qual

ity a

nd m

anag

emen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral i

nput

s, in

clud

ing

wat

er a

nd la

nd

2,40

1.1

1,15

0.2

896.

9 25

3.4

1,25

0.8

I.3. E

nhan

ced

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd su

stai

nabl

e pr

oduc

tion

of a

nim

al so

urce

food

s 79

2.1

298.

6 26

8.2

30.4

49

3.4

II. E

ffici

ent a

nd n

utri

tion-

sens

itive

pos

t-ha

rves

t tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

and

valu

e ad

ditio

n

3,17

2.2

1,92

5.3

1,46

5.0

460.

3 1,

246.

9 II

.1. S

treng

then

ed p

ost-h

arve

st v

alue

cha

in w

ith p

artic

ular

focu

s on

MSM

Es (s

tora

ge, p

roce

ssin

g,

bran

ding

, lab

ellin

g, m

arke

ting

and

trade

) 43

7.1

53.3

37

.1

16.3

38

3.8

II.2

. Im

prov

ed a

cces

s to

mar

kets

, fac

ilitie

s and

info

rmat

ion

2,73

5.1

1,87

2.0

1,42

8.0

444.

0 86

3.1

III.

Impr

oved

die

tary

div

ersit

y, c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n 22

8.1

174.

2 11

8.2

56.0

53

.9

III.1

. Enh

ance

d nu

tritio

n kn

owle

dge,

pro

mot

ion

of g

ood

prac

tices

, and

con

sum

ptio

n of

safe

and

nu

tritio

us d

iets

89

.2

35.4

8.

5 26

.9

53.8

II

I.2. O

ptim

ised

food

util

isat

ion

thro

ugh

prov

isio

n of

safe

wat

er, i

mpr

oved

food

hyg

iene

and

sa

nita

tion

13

8.9

138.

8 10

9.7

29.1

0.

1 IV

. Enh

ance

d ac

cess

to so

cial

pro

tect

ion

and

safe

ty n

ets a

nd in

crea

sed

resi

lienc

e 1,

807.

6 1,

752.

5 53

0.3

1,22

2.1

55.2

IV

.1. T

imel

y an

d ef

fect

ive

disa

ster

resp

onse

s thr

ough

em

erge

ncy

food

dis

tribu

tion,

agr

icul

ture

re

habi

litat

ion

and

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

961.

6 96

0.8

160.

7 80

0.0

0.8

IV.2

. Stre

ngth

ened

cas

h an

d fo

od-b

ased

pro

gram

mes

for t

arge

ted

grou

ps a

cros

s the

life

cyc

le

incl

udin

g di

sabl

ed a

nd d

ispl

aced

pop

ulat

ions

84

6.1

791.

736

9.6

422.

154

.4

V.1

. Im

prov

ed fo

od sa

fety

, qua

lity

cont

rol a

nd a

ssur

ance

, aw

aren

ess o

n fo

od sa

fety

and

hyg

iene

82

.6

11.9

9.

8 2.

0 70

.8

V.2

. Red

uced

food

loss

es a

nd w

aste

-

- -

- -

V.3

. Im

prov

ed in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta fo

r evi

denc

e-ba

sed

mon

itorin

g an

d ad

just

men

t of p

olic

ies a

nd

prog

ram

mes

46

.5

45.3

5.

7 39

.6

1.3

V.4

. Im

prov

ed F

NS

gove

rnan

ce, c

apac

ity st

reng

then

ing

and

lead

ersh

ip a

cros

s FN

S re

leva

nt

stak

ehol

ders

98

.3

80.0

1.

5 78

.5

18.4

Gra

nd T

otal

9,

250.

7 5,

622.

1 3,

443.

0 2,

179.

0 3,

628.

7

227.

5 13

7.1

17.0

12

0.2

90.4

V

. Str

engt

hene

d en

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t and

cro

ss-c

uttin

g pr

ogra

mm

es fo

r ac

hiev

ing

food

and

nu

triti

on se

curi

ty


Tab

le 6

. Nut

riti

on-s

ensi

tive

CIP

2 to

tal,

exis

ting

res

ourc

es a

nd a

ddit

iona

l fin

anci

ng r

equi

red,

as

of J

une

2016

(in

mill

ion

US$

)

CIP

2 Pr

ogra

mm

es b

y pi

llar

Tot

al C

IP2

Tot

al e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s F

inan

cing

gap

T

otal

GoB

DPs

I.

Div

ersi

fied

and

sust

aina

ble

agri

cultu

re, f

ishe

ries

and

live

stoc

k fo

r he

alth

y di

ets

2,65

7.3

1,03

0.1

817.

8 21

2.3

1,62

7.2

I.1. S

usta

inab

le in

tens

ifica

tion

and

dive

rsifi

catio

n of

cro

p-ba

sed

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

s 46

6.6

138.

0 11

0.5

27.5

32

8.6

I.2. I

mpr

oved

acc

ess,

qual

ity a

nd m

anag

emen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral i

nput

s, in

clud

ing

wat

er a

nd la

nd

1,60

1.2

672.

7 50

7.5

165.

2 92

8.5

I.3. E

nhan

ced

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd su

stai

nabl

e pr

oduc

tion

of a

nim

al so

urce

food

s 58

9.5

219.

419

9.8

19.6

370.

1II

. Effi

cien

t and

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve p

ost-h

arve

st tr

ansf

orm

atio

n an

d va

lue

addi

tion

1,

586.

1 96

2.7

732.

5 23

0.1

623.

4 II

.1. S

treng

then

ed p

ost-h

arve

st v

alue

cha

in w

ith p

artic

ular

focu

s on

MSM

Es

(sto

rage

, pro

cess

ing,

bra

ndin

g, la

belli

ng, m

arke

ting

and

trade

) 21

8.6

26.7

18

.5

8.1

191.

9

II.2

. Im

prov

ed a

cces

s to

mar

kets

, fac

ilitie

s and

info

rmat

ion

1,36

7.5

936.

0 71

4.0

222.

0 43

1.5

III.

Impr

oved

die

tary

div

ersit

y, c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n 17

3.6

130.

7 88

.7

42.0

42

.9

III.1

. Enh

ance

d nu

tritio

n kn

owle

dge,

pro

mot

ion

of g

ood

prac

tices

, and

con

sum

ptio

n of

safe

and

nut

ritio

us d

iets

69

.4

26.6

6.

4 20

.2

42.9

III.2

. Opt

imis

ed fo

od u

tilis

atio

n th

roug

h pr

ovis

ion

of sa

fe w

ater

, im

prov

ed fo

od

hygi

ene

and

sani

tatio

n

104.

2 10

4.1

82.3

21

.8

0.1

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n an

d sa

fety

net

s and

incr

ease

d re

silie

nce

1,07

5.9

1,03

4.5

265.

5 76

9.0

41.4

IV

.1. T

imel

y an

d ef

fect

ive

disa

ster

resp

onse

s thr

ough

em

erge

ncy

food

dis

tribu

tion,

ag

ricul

ture

reha

bilit

atio

n an

d m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s 54

5.0

544.

4 91

.9

452.

5 0.

6 IV

.2. S

treng

then

ed c

ash

and

food

-bas

ed p

rogr

amm

es fo

r tar

gete

d gr

oups

acr

oss t

he

life

cycl

e in

clud

ing

disa

bled

and

dis

plac

ed p

opul

atio

ns

531.

0 49

0.2

173.

6 31

6.6

40.8

V.1

. Im

prov

ed fo

od sa

fety

, qua

lity

cont

rol a

nd a

ssur

ance

, aw

aren

ess o

n fo

od sa

fety

an

d hy

gien

e 62

.08.

9 7.

41.

553

.1V

.2. R

educ

ed fo

od lo

sses

and

was

te

- -

- -

- V

.3.

Impr

oved

info

rmat

ion

and

data

for e

vide

nce-

base

d m

onito

ring

and

adju

stm

ent

of p

olic

ies a

nd p

rogr

amm

es

23.3

22

.6

2.8

19.8

0.

6

V.4

. Im

prov

ed F

NS

gove

rnan

ce, c

apac

ity st

reng

then

ing

and

lead

ersh

ip a

cros

s FN

S re

leva

nt st

akeh

olde

rs

49.2

40.0

0.7

39.3

9.2

Gra

nd T

otal

5,

627.

33,

229.

51,

915.

41,

314.

12,

397.

8

V. S

tren

gthe

ned

enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent a

nd c

ross

-cut

ting

prog

ram

mes

for

achi

evin

g fo

od a

nd n

utri

tion

secu

rity

13

4.4

71.5

10

.9

60.6

62

.9

Figu

re 5

. Bud

get s

hare

s of e

ach

pilla

r in

the

tota

l CIP

2 af

ter

nutr

ition

wei

ghtin

g


V. S

treng

then

ed e

nabl

ing

envi

ronm

ent a

nd c

ross

-cu

tting

pro

gram

mes

for a

chie

ving

food

and

nut

ritio

nse

curit

y

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n an

d sa

fety

nets

and

incr

ease

d re

silie

nce

III.

Impr

oved

die

tary

div

ersi

ty,

cons

umpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n

II. E

ffici

ent a

nd n

utrit

ion-

sens

itive

pos

t-ha

rves

t tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

and

valu

e ad

ditio

n

I. D

iver

sifie

d an

d su

stai

nabl

eag

ricul

ture

, fis

herie

s and

live

stoc

kfo

r hea

lthy

diet

s

3%

3%

19%

47%

28%

Figu

re 6

. Nut

ritio

n-w

eigh

ted

CIP

2 bu

dget

acc

ordi

ng to

the

MA

FAP

clas

sific

atio

n, in

US$

mill

ion


V.2.

Kno

wle

dge s

harin

g on

clim

ate c

hang

e ada

ptat

ion,

60.

78

S. M

arke

ting,

47.

41

Q.3

. Rur

al el

ectri

city,

67.

33

U. C

lean

wat

er, s

anita

tion

and

heal

th, 3

4.14

Q.1

. Rur

al ro

ads,

brid

ges a

nd cu

lver

ts, 8

36.9

0

Oth

er ca

tego

ries r

epre

sent

ing

belo

w 1

% o

f the

tota

l,70

2.03

O.5

. Oth

er m

easu

res i

n su

ppor

t to

food

safe

ty an

dqu

ality

, 341

.95

O.4

. Ins

pect

ion

of ag

ricul

tura

l inp

uts,

602.

85

O.1

. Vet

erin

ary

and

plan

t ins

pect

ion,

321

.49

Not

clas

sifie

d, 9

8.67

G.2

. Mic

ronu

trien

t and

dew

orm

ing

inte

rven

tions

,16

1.34

F.3.

In-k

ind

trans

fers

, 1,2

95.2

0

E.1.

Em

ploy

men

t pro

gram

mes

, 37.

48

B.3.

On-

farm

serv

ices (

pest

and

dise

ase

cont

rol/v

eterin

ary

serv

ices,

on-fa

rm tr

ainin

g,tec

hnica

l ass

istan

ce, e

xten

sion

etc.,

othe

r), 2

47.2

2

B.1.

Var

iable

inpu

ts (se

eds,

ferti

llise

r, en

ergy

, cre

dit,

othe

r), 2

36.4

1

Adm

inist

rativ

e cos

ts, 1

60.0

1

1.1.

4. P

aym

ents

to p

roce

ssor

s, 16

6.89

1.1.

3. P

aym

ents

to su

pplie

rs,15

8.97

V.6.

Oth

er su

ppor

t to

wea

ther

var

iabi

llity

and

clim

ate c

hang

em

itiga

tion,

50.

21


Table 7. Nutrition-sensitive and nutrition-supportive interventions in the CIP2 (in billion US$)

CIP2 Programmes by pillar nutrition- sensitive

nutrition- supportive

grand total

I. Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets 3117.5 697.8 3815.3

I.1. Sustainable intensification and diversification of crop-based production systems 622.1 0.0 622.1

I.2. Improved access, quality and management of agricultural inputs, including water and land 1721.7 679.4 2401.1

I.3. Enhanced productivity and sustainable production of animal source foods 773.7 18.4 792.1

II. Efficient and nutrition-sensitive post-harvest transformation and value addition 0.0 3172.2 3172.2

II.1. Strengthened post-harvest value chain with particular focus on MSMEs 0.0 437.1 437.1

II.2. Improved access to markets, facilities and information 0.0 2735.1 2735.1

III. Improved dietary diversity, consumption and utilisation 228.1 0.0 228.1

III.1. Enhanced nutrition knowledge, promotion of good practices, and consumption of safe and nutritious diets 89.2 0.0 89.2

III.2. Optimised food utilisation through provision of safe water, improved food hygiene and sanitation 138.9 0.0 138.9

IV. Enhanced access to social protection and safety nets and in-creased resilience 1122.0 685.7 1807.6

IV.1. Timely and effective disaster preparedness and responses through emergency food distribution, steps towards agricultural sector rehabilitation and mitigation measures

275.9 685.7 961.6

IV.2. Strengthened cash and food based programmes for targeted groups across the life cycle including disabled and displaced populations 846.1 0.0 846.1

V. Strengthened enabling environment and cross-cutting programmes for achieving food and nutrition security 82.6 144.9 227.5

V.1. Improved food safety, quality control and assurance, awareness on food safety and hygiene 82.6 0.0 82.6

V.2. Reduced food losses and waste 0.0 0.0 0.0

V.3. Improved information and data for evidence-based monitoring and adjustment of policies and programmes 0.0 46.5 46.5

V.4. Improved FNS governance, capacity strengthening and leadership across FNS relevant stakeholders 0.0 98.3 98.3

Grand Total 4550.2 4700.5 9250.7

Note: Nutrition-sensitive in this table includes ‘nutrition-sensitive +’ projects


The CIP2 is a strategic tool for integrating investments for nutrition-sensitive food systems into a com-prehensive results framework which will help mobilise financial resources to respond to arising needs over the Plan timeline. To achieve its outcomes, the CIP needs to be implemented through coherent planning, budgeting and financing processes that harness all resources, while building on existing synergies and avoiding duplications. Efforts are needed to rationalise the mobilisation of financial resources by ensuring:

• Regular consultations on the mobilisation and use of financial resources with FPMU, the Ministry of Finance, the Planning Commission, and all line ministries and DPs involved in the CIP2;

• Quality monitoring of disbursed, available and pledged financial resources followed by an effective dissemination of the results; and

• Regular fora to promote private investment in FNS involving the private sector, farmer organi-sations, CSOs, line ministries and the Chamber of Commerce.

Keeping track of the spending progress is particularly important in view of the limited execution perfor-mance observed in the monitoring of the first CIP. To this effect, investment absorption capacity must be enhanced. This requires capacity development support of stakeholders, and especially government agencies involved, as is proposed under Programme V.4.

Finally, the GoB and the DPs should focus their efforts on financing the resource gap and prioritising nutrition-sensitive activities. They should also invest in projects that will help leverage investments and resources from the private sector, farmer organisations and CSOs. Dialogue will be required throughout to avoid duplications of efforts in a country with a high density of donors and NGOs and good practices will be actively sought to be scaled up, especially those relating to contractual arrangements e.g. contract farming and supply chains, and PPPs.



12. Challenges and risks The implementation of the CIP2 is associated with a number of challenges or risks shown in Table 8. Many of these risks and mitigation factors are similar to those identified for the CIP1, and efforts should be made to learn from the past experience in reducing these risks and minimising their effects.

Table 8. Risks associated with the CIP2 implementation and possible mitigation solutions

Critical risks measures Risk mitigation Lack of adequate political commitment and ownership from GoB and DPs which may give rise to the development of uncoordinated projects which duplicate efforts and miss out on potential synergies

Keep a high political profile and strategic focus

Strengthen the dialogue with DPs and involve them in the review of the results of the annual monitoring

Ensure that CIP2 implementation arrangements are mainstreamed into different country systems: planning, budgeting, financial management and reporting are gradually aligned Further develop the country’s capacity to coordinate investments effectively Continue involving the Finance Division and ERD in implementation arrangements Regularly bring together the several instances involved in the CIP2 implementation and monitoring for possible reviews and changes to the document Ensure the CIP2 is seen as a ‘living document’ that may evolve and react dynamically and promptly to emerging issues

Develop a better understanding of the total amounts and the composition of FNS expenditure as well as of the agents that benefit from such investments. Achieving this will require an in-depth assessment of FNS public expenditures. Establish synergies with NPAN2 and the NSSS

Insufficient fund mobilisation

Continue the regular monitoring of CIP2 results which includes the progress in expenditure and resource mobilisation Ensure the results of the monitoring exercise feeds into the GoB’s planning and financial systems - 7FYP, MTBF, ADP- and into the Economic Relations Division’s outreach to motivate new/additional funds from development partners Develop gender-disaggregated monitoring and evaluation indicators

Conduct awareness-raising training for all stakeholders

Conduct awareness-raising training for all stakeholders

Weak coordination between the many institutions involved in the implementation and monitoring may result in weak effec-tiveness and delivery and a failure to react to emerging issues

Lack of an overall understanding of the state of FNS expenditure in Bangladesh given the many relevant policies/strategies and actors. The CIP2 alone only focuses on development expenditures

Insufficient gender mainstreaming thus missing out on the potential provided by women in solving some of the FNS problems through their role in agriculture, as carers etc.

Insufficient integration of environmental issues in FNS projects


Commission research to better understand the impact of climate change on FNS Ensure close coordination and interaction with the Bangladesh EFCC CIP 2016-2021

Invest in Research and Development Promote learning Scale up good practices

Lack of involvement of private sector, farmers organisations and other CSOs

Prioritise investments with high leverage effect on other partners’ investments Sustain dialogue with private sector, farmer organisations and CSOs

Critical risks measures Risk mitigation

Tendency to rely on old solutions with limited interest in innovative ones, thus missing out on opportunities to acceler-ate the achievement of CIP2 outcomes

AnnexesAnnex 1: List of consultations

1. Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture at BARC in Dhaka (10 April 2016)2. Consultation with the participation of FPMU, the TWG, the TTs, BNNC, the authors of the

background papers and the MUCH TAT at CIRDAP in Dhaka (9 May 2017)3. Regional consultation with government officials and stakeholders at Hotel Castel Salam in

Khulna (14 May)4. Rural consultation with farmers from agriculture, fisheries and livestock in Khatail Village of

Dacop Upazila of Khulna District, Khulna Division (15 May)5. Rural consultation with farmers from agriculture, fisheries and livestock in Rakudia Village,

Dehergoti Union of Babugonj Upazila, Barisal District, Barisal Division (16 May)6. Regional consultation with government officials and stakeholders at Grand Park Hotel in Baris-

al, Barisal District, Barisal Division (16 May)7. Regional consultation with government officials and stakeholders at Motel Shaikat in Chit-

tagong, Chittagong Division (21 May)8. Regional consultation with government officials and stakeholders at Parjatan Motel in Rang-

pur, Rangpur Division (22 May)9. Regional consultation with government officials and stakeholders at the Bangladesh Agricul-

tural University (BAU), Mymensingh, Mymensingh Division (24 May)10. Regional consultation in BAU, Mymensingh with academia and researchers (24 May)11. Rural consultation with farmers from agriculture, fisheries and livestock and local government

officials in Tuker Bazar Village, Sylhet Sadar Upazila, Sylhet District, Sylhet Division (24 May)

12. Consultation with the private sector at CIRDAP in Dhaka (6 July)13. Consultation with the Development Partners, the UN, CSOs and academia, Bangabandhu Inter-

national Conference Center, Dhaka (23 July)14. Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection, le Meridien, Dhaka (4-5

December)


Figure 7. Location of the CIP2 consultations


• Maintain nutritious value along the value chain, whilst removing anti-nutritional factors from products. Particularly highlighted was the reduction of BOAA content in khesari and reduction of erucic acid in mustard oil.

• Conduct strong agricultural extension servic-es, in terms of: √ Diversifying food production, including

homestead and rooftop gardening, crop diversification, small-scale fish culture and livestock husbandry;

√ Shifting consumption patterns towards healthier diets, reflecting dietary diversi-ty -yellow, orange, dark green and leafy vegetables, fruits, dairy products, pulses, fish and meat- akin to the nutrition plate endorsed by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare;

√ Raising awareness on food hygiene, ideal cooking practices and sanitation;

√ Raising awareness on food safety and quality, food adulteration and contamina-tion and mitigation measures targeted for various actors along the food chain;

√ Building strong linkages with nutri-tion-specific interventions such as the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices.

• Promote adequate use of agricultural inputs such as pesticides, insecticides and fertilisers for safer food through the integral role of extension services.

• Increase the productivity of rice, which is relevant and provide further emphasis on this to free land and water resources for produc-tion diversity -crop diversification, horticul-

ture, livestock, etc.-. • Collaborate among sub-sectors in agriculture

to integrate nutrition outcomes – crops, fisheries, livestock, horticulture and forestry and multi-sectorally with health particularly with NNS, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), education, gender and climate change.

• Improve post-harvest facility through: √ Increasing storage facilities for food

safety issues;√ Improving processing and preservation

techniques -handling, transportation, packaging and storage, etc.- for perisha-ble fruits and vegetables;

√ Agro-processing of small indigenous fish (SIS) into chutney and fish powder – particularly mola, dhela and puti as per the National Nutrition Policy (NNP), but also other fish that are rich in protein need to be considered.

• Consider biofortification and HYVs as impor-tant measures for nutrition holistically along with other measures to better target the 1,000-days window of opportunity for nutri-tion.

• Improve access to land and resources for smallholders for production diversification.

• Include focus on obesity in policy and programming alongside undernutrition.

• Establish a common database relating nutri-tion and agriculture.

• Scale up known successes – linking govern-ment institutional arrangement with commu-nity-based approaches.

Annex 2: Main issues raised during the consultations and recommendations for action

Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture in Dhaka, BARC Auditorium on the 10th of April 2016

The Ministry of Agriculture and MUCH project in collaboration with BARC, Civil Society Alliance for SUN, Helen Keller International, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and World Fish organised a Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture in order to prioritise and address nutrition-sensitive approaches and actions in FNS. The inauguration of the symposium was attended by around 250 representatives from the Government, development partners, academia, private sector and the media. This was followed by a technical session in the afternoon, which was attended by around 100 participants. The symposium pooled together the thoughts of this group of food, policy and agriculture experts in a crucial discussion to develop a common understanding of the potential and the role of nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) in Bangladesh.

The following key issues, points and recommendations were raised:

Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture in Dhaka, BARC Auditorium on the 10th of April 2016


• Maintain the natural resource base. • Expand markets and market access for vulner-

able groups, particularly for marketing nutri-tious foods.

• Promote multi-agency and multi-sectoral collaboration to build common indicators.

• Develop national capacity - Agricultural Policy Support Unit (APSU), BIRTAN, BARC, BFSA and FPMU -the last two are supported by FAO.

• Promote further consultations with other sectors: health, WASH, education, gender, environment and climate change; land and water resources.

• Enhance private sector engagement through: √ Building awareness of nutrition along the

food chain -maintain quality control, food safety and nutrient contents in food- and of good agricultural practices;

√ Facilitating better access to low-interest loans for small and medium enterprises

for maintenance of quality and food safety along the food chain;

√ Monitoring quality of produce through grading and certification;

√ Attaining mainstream export markets, but not at the cost of domestic consump-tion.

• Engage with media for strengthened BCC.• Explore scale up of rooftop gardens in the

urban context. • Explore the potential in avocado technology. • Engage with the Ministry of Finance to lever-

age nutrition-sensitive agriculture finance.• Strengthen capacity of NNS to coordinate and

give more coordinating authority. • Provide further attention to the major issue of

food safety – BFSA has a large role to play. • Integrate nutrition more strongly into CIP

monitoring reports produced by FPMU.

• Use of land mapping and crop zoning to achieve self-sufficiency in major vegeta-bles and reduction of food losses.

• Strengthen/institute biosecurity measures, practices, livestock productivity, and increase milk production.

• Set nutrient targets in food production across

crop, fisheries and livestock sectors. • Apply zone specific and location specific

technologies to address issues of climate change.

• Improve fish seed quality. • Increase/reactivate of the budget for NARS

for more research.

• Need more and better inputs.• Assess irrigation needed for crops.• Ensure tested quality seeds, new varieties and

seed development; adequate and appropriate

credit support for female farmers and share cropping farmers; supply of good quality and unadulterated fertilisers, pesticides and feeds; stopping loss of arable land and fertility.

• Check cost and returns of the farmer to prevent distortions created by middlemen.

• Boost food processing and food preservation industries.

• Identify bottlenecks in processing and packaging.• Promote and support household level process-

ing and value addition. • Introduce methods of processing micronutri-

ent-rich foods. • Stimulate non-government initiatives for inno-

vation and research on appropriate technolo-gies.

Consultation in Dhaka, CIRDAP on the 9th of May 2017 This meeting brought together government officials from the FPMU, members of the Technical Work-ing Group and 39 participants from the Thematic Teams, the BNNC, as well as the authors of the thematic background papers. The MUCH Technical Assistance Team was also present. The following priority issues were put forward for consideration.

Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets

Agricultural inputs and water resources

Post-harvest transformation, value addition and supply

Consultation in Dhaka, CIRDAP on the 9th of May 2017


• Build awareness of farmers -and others- on need to have a balanced diet.

• Develop nutrition education and sensitisation in social safety net programmes and generally with a focus on women.

• Develop nutrition education materials for different types of audiences.

• Carry out national nutrition survey to guide development of nutrition-sensitive programmes.

• Regulate advertisements on trans fats and salt rich foods, junk foods.

• Promote healthy foods for children.• Develop sanitation and wash programmes. • Explore food-based treatment for diseases.• Identify nutritional needs of older people and

invest in this aspect given the ageing popula-tion.

• Apply the life cycle approach in social protec-tion.

• Focus on nutrition-sensitive programmes. • Improve reach of vulnerable groups in the

community/areas/regions and prevent/miti-gate/address major disasters occurring.

• Better identify vulnerable groups in different regions of the country.

• Ensure proper disbursement of cash to the beneficiaries through: updated list of benefi-

ciaries; online money transfer; information to beneficiaries through SMS.

• Increase coverage for the elderly in view of the increased life expectancy in Bangladesh.

• Fortify food based safety nets with micronu-trients.

• Key policy changes in government/public procurement system to ensure farmer’s access.

• Focus on backward and forward linkages to address food safety issues across the value chain, especially in horticulture.

• Put in place Good Practices in irrigation water, pond water use, pesticide use, for food safety.

• Accredit and upgrade laboratories. • Strengthen capacity in areas of inspection,

certification as per international standards, create relevant graduate programmes and invest in food testing facilities all over the country and laboratories.

• Train more food safety personnel.• Create hygiene awareness.• Ensure compliance.• Coordinate the work of BSTI, Bangladesh

accreditation board and BFSA.• Ensure adequate legal and organised frame-

work for food safety and quality monitoring.

Governance • Clarity regional involvement. • Promote coordination between ministries. • Convince ministries and departments to chan-

nel funds through the CIP – for example funding for the fisheries sector was low in the

first CIP and yet it is essential to achieve the NFP goal.

• Harmonise CIP projects and SDGs Plan of Action; otherwise there may be chance of duplication.

Increased dietary diversity, consumption and utilisation

Enhanced access to social protection, safety nets and increased resilience

Strengthened enabling environment for achieving food and nutrition security

Food safety

Regional consultation in Khulna, Khulna Division on 14th of May 2017

Close to 25 representatives of local public institutions and other stakeholders participated in the consul-tation that was held in Khulna. A DAE Additional Director for the Khulna District chaired the session while a Deputy Director from the Khulna Divisional Livestock office and a Deputy Director from the Khulna Division Department of Fisheries made brief presentations as special guests. Other participants included members of academia, extension officials, traders, private sector actors, public representatives,


• Continue land mapping and crop zoning.• Give incentives for particular crops depending

on region.

• Encourage shrimp cultivation in right condi-tions.

• Establish regional collection centres to be managed by agricultural cooperatives.

• Declare the minimum buying and selling prices of the major crops in regional centres estab-

lished in the union, upazila, zila and division-al level.

• Continue motivational training and awareness

building of farmers on processing and preservation of foods and value addition.

• Strengthen inter departmental coordination among agriculture, fisheries and livestock, food local departments.

• Promote regional budgeting to ensure local needs are taken into account.

• Increase awareness about nutrition by forming community groups, including people from different groups, and disseminating the infor-mation among all age categories.

• Include nutrition in academic curricula.• Involve more departments in the provision of

nutrition training.• Train physicians and influential community

members on the role of nutrition on disease prevention.

• Increase availability of animal-based nutrition by increasing livestock production.

• Build awareness on alternative sources of protein as animal protein is often expensive.

• Provide immediate food and cash assistance for vulnerable groups.

• Provide medical assistance for vulnerable groups.

• Promote productive asset transfers to poor people to encourage income generation.

• Infrastructure development -embankments, fresh water storage, etc.-.

• Consider all types of vulnerable groups in social protection: women, children, elderly, boatman, fisherman, farmer, honey collec-tors, firewood cutters.

• Address issues of endemic disease, waterlog-ging, scarcity of drinking water rapidly after disasters.

• Raise public awareness, preparedness and adequate weather forecasting to respond quickly to disasters.

• Include nutritive food ingredients such as protein in food rations distributed.

• Centralise information of cash-in kind safety nets and regularly update the database.

• Address food losses by improving cold chains, storage systems and by establishing food processing industries.

• Apply GMP and Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) in production practices.

• Give NARS the means to develop zone-spe-cific adaptive technologies.

• Sensitise policy makers to the need for nutri-tion-sensitive policies.

and NGOs. The following points and issues were raised in the open, group discussions and plenary sessions in the light of the programmes and priority interventions of CIP2.


Post-harvest transformation, value addition, nutrition and supply


Enhanced access to social protection and safety nets and increased resilience


Rural consultation in Khatail Village of Dacop Upazila, Khulna District, Khulna Division on 15th of May 2017

The farmers’ consultation included 54 participants, including 17 women farmers, and identified the following priorities for investment.


Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets Agriculture



• Improve training for farmers especially with regards to use of technology.

• Build storage facility of grains, fruits and vege-tables for gaining profitable price.

Fisheries

• Facilitate the process for ensuring quality seeds at growers’ level since fish seed production in Bangladesh is dominated by the private sector.

• Establish fish seed multiplication farms in every upazila.

• There is a lack of training, manpower and lack of knowledge in the fishery sector at the grass roots’ level.

Livestock• Support in artificial insemination.• Address foot and mouth disease.• Make good quality cows available locally for

rearing and adequate milk production.• Ensure training reaches farmers that need it

instead of those that are well connected. • Improve government training.

• Harvest water for cultivation as well as for drinking and cooking.

• Maintain sluice gates to control saline water intrusion.

• Reserve surface water for use in farming.• Continue river dredging.• Recover government canals from occupiers

and re-excavate them for farmers’ use.• Dig canals and construct embankments on

the side of canals/ponds/khals as necessary.• Stop the leasing of canals.• Improve water distribution systems and

strengthen canal digging both for irrigation-and for the benefit of fish production.

• Deal with soil salinity.• Increase loan facilities for farmers on easy

terms and conditions. Also, farmers often do not know about the available loan facilities in the banks so this needs to be transmitted to them.

• Make quality, safe and pure seeds available from the Bangladesh Agricultural Develop-ment Corporation (BADC).

• Address the high cost of fish feed: tk. 50 to 60 per kg and tk. 90 per kg for prawn.

• Make more quality affordable food for cows e.g. rice husk, gur and khoil available.

• Develop cold storage as it is inexistent or insufficient in some areas.

• Establish milk chilling centres for value addi-tion as well as marketing facilities for eggs, meat and milk.

• Develop facilities for the production of yoghurt as a way to prolong the life of milk.

• Teach milk producers to produce ‘channa’39 for the production of sweets which can last longer.

• Develop and adapt marketing infrastructure for all produce, including fish.

• Try to solve the problem of farmers not obtain-ing a fair price of their produce. Middlemen and syndicates seem to be the ones that gain most in the food value chain.This applies to crop, fish and livestock agriculture. Encourage the formation of farmer societies to promote their interests.

• Develop transport and communication for better market links.

39Cottage cheese


• Promote the production of high value crop and ensure new varieties are developed.

• Local produce needs to be promoted.• Organise hands-on nutrition training for farm-

ers.

• Use mobile applications to communicate agricultural information to farmers.

• Promote shrimp cultivation.

• Organise production based on crop zoning to make optimal use of land.

• Address problem of water salinisation and dearth of sweet water needs.

• Fish-friendly dam building should be consid-ered.

• Develop medicine for cattle to prevent diseas-es. Resistance to antibiotics is already a prob-lem in this area.

• Develop horticulture to meet nutritional needs of the people.

• Linkages between research-extension and marketing need to be strengthened.

• Promote the formation of farmers' organisa-tions

• Strengthen market linkages.• Link producers to consumers by enhancing

communication means through ICTs for example.

• Improve post-harvest collection and storage systems with the introduction of improved technology.

• Reduce post-harvest loss and ensure food safety measures along the value chain, establishment of Post-Harvest Service Centre (PHSC) may be actively considered in potential locations.

• Build modern growth/trade/collection centres for agri-products along with good trans-port/communication facilities e.g. cooling vans and storage and packaging plants. In particular, expand cold storage system for perishable items.

• Promote the establishment of agro-based processing industries e.g. for the processing of guava, coconut, coco dust, golden apple, fish, especially at the local level.

• Enhance women’s participation in fish, fruits and vegetable production and processing.

• Recognise and value the women household activities.

Increased dietary diversity, consumption and utilisation • Ensure constant availability of medicines in community clinics.

Enhanced access to social protection and safety nets and increased resilience • Include nutritious food items in the SSNs programmes that distribute food.

Strengthened enabling environment for achieving food and nutrition security • Address the problem of fish and poultry feed adulteration.

Regional Consultation at Hotel Grand Park, Barisal on the 16th of May 2017

Twenty-three representatives of local public institutions and NGO officials attended this consultation, including an Additional Director from DAE, Barisal District who chaired the session. The special guests were a Deputy Director from the Barisal Divisional Livestock office and a Deputy Director from the Barisal Department of Fisheries. What follows summarises the priorities for investment flagged for the Barisal region.





• Invest in consumers’ behaviour change com-munication, nutrition education/training with special emphasis on the elderly, women and children.

• Spread nutrition messages through SMS, electronic and print media.

• Establish a reliable database of vulnerable people and/or beneficiaries.

• Ensure dissemination of nutrition awareness messages before and after disasters.

• Utilise technology e.g. SMSs to distribute funds under social protection schemes.

• Incorporate micronutrient-enriched foods in food-based SSN programmes and ensure such foods can be afforded by vulnerable groups.

• Promote school feeding programmes for disad-vantaged children.

Food Waste• Establish waste management systems as well

as waste recycling.• Carry out cooking demonstrations to show

how to minimise food waste.• Develop appropriate packing so that fewer

quantities are spoilt.• Sensitise farmers to improve storage.

Governance• Strengthen the national level nutrition coordi-

nation body.

• Inform policy by carrying out research at regional level.

Food Safety• Strengthen food safety and biosecurity in poul-

try, fish and crop production, and strengthen monitoring systems through law enforcement.

• Ensure food safety protocols are maintained at all steps from farm to fork.

• Increase awareness programmes.

Agriculture

• Strengthen early warning systems. • Try to solve labour shortages during harvest-

ing season which mean that labour costs are high, thus reducing farmers’ profit.

Fisheries• Increase availability of adequate and quality

fish seed/fingerlings.

Livestock• Promote use of fresh milk: producers find it

difficult to compete with imported powdered milk.

• Work on reducing the role of middlemen/syn-dicates who distort markets. For example, this can affect the price of chicks which fluctuates considerably; it can more than treble within 5 days.

• Promote buried water pipeline irrigation.• Provide low interest agriculture loans to farmers.• Control the price of fish which is too costly as

well as the price of vitamins and medicines required.

• Enhance the availability of medicines for livestock in local offices.

• Ensure that cattle/poultry feed is unadulterat-ed and of high quality as well as affordable.




Rural consultation in Rakudia Village, Dehergoti Union of Babugonj Upazila, Barisal District, Barisal Division on 16th of May 2017

Forty-three farmers, including seven women, attended the discussion and raised the following issues and needs for investment. Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets







Food Safety • Special training, including biosecurity, is required for the shrimp/fish and livestock farmers Regional consultation at Motel Shaikat in Chittagong on the 21st of May 2017

Sixteen representatives of local public institutions and other stakeholders participated in this meeting with a Health Divisional Director chairing the session. A Deputy Director from the Chittagong Depart-ment of Livestock Services and a District Fisheries Officer from the Chittagong Division Department of Fisheries were also present as special guests.


• Promote milk farming clubs and build milk preservation systems.

• Strengthen market structure and communica-

tion systems for agri products.• Develop milk chilling centres to enable dairy

farmers to obtain fair prices.

• Ensure availability and supply of medicine in Health Centres and community clinics.

• Ensure regular presence of Bachelor of Medi-

cine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) doctors in community clinics.

• Strengthen nutrition awareness programmes.

• Review and check process whereby SSN bene-ficiaries are selected as there is evidence to suggest that influential -and sometimes afflu-

ent- families benefit from these programmes. • Introduce insurance system.

• Broaden the use of ICTs for agriculture exten-sion purposes.

• Enhance farmers’ knowledge of nutrition and the need for diet diversity.

• Establish ‘safe shelter’ to protect animals from salinity, cyclone and other disasters.

Agriculture

• Continue mapping and zoning for crop produc-tion.

• Promote the cultivation of fruits, especially mango in hilly areas.

• Promote pulses cultivation.

Fisheries • Promote fish rearing in the hilly areas, espe-

cially of eels. • Restore and sustain local varieties of fish.• Strengthen fish cultivation in sweet water reser-

voirs in the hilly areas.• Add government officials from the fishery and

livestock departments below the upazila level

similarly to the sub-assistant agriculture officers of the Agriculture Ministry and health workers of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW).

• Develop fish cultivation in areas affected by salinity.


The meeting included 17 representatives of local public institutions and other stakeholders, including an Additional Director from the Rangpur District Department of Agriculture Extension who chaired the session. A Deputy Director from the Rangpur Department of Livestock Services and from Rangpur Department of Agriculture Extension were present as special guests. The following points and issues were raised in the open, group discussions and plenary session:


• Increase productivity through mechanisation and technology since land for agriculture is becoming scarcer due to other pressures e.g. house building and industrialisation.

• Zinc fortified varieties need to be promoted as well as vegetables strong in


• Disseminate sustainable practices with regards to pest and insect management. A lot of progress has already been made; fewer pesticides and insecticides are being used than before (and use of pheromones instead).

• Use Teesta barrage canals used for seasonal fish culture with appropriate fish species.

essential nutrients such as carrots and sweet gourd.

• Promote rice-vegetables based cropping patterns.

• Farm owners consume animal protein and vegetables but not enough.

• Develop healthy soils to produce food through research by the Soil Research Institute.

• Expand soil testing through mobile soil testing labs to match soils to crops.


• Develop agro-based industry in this area for local produce. For example, potatoes are grown in abundance, but no post-harvest processing takes place due to lack of facilities. The same applies to milk which is therefore wasted if not sold. Concurrently, powdered milk is imported.

• Establish cold storage at district level and upazila levels as well as cool chain

development. Specialised cold storage is needed for example for lychees in regions like Rangpur.

• Develop growth centres and link them to potential markets.

• Understand the role of middle men given the huge differences between retail and farm gate prices.

• Low cost packaging is needed for milk.


• Develop adequate and relevant nutrition education materials.

• Strengthen nutrition awareness and training programme to build new food habits, especially for the younger generations. These trainings should include nutrition targets.

• Encourage milk and egg consumption to improve the population’s nutritional status. This would also encourage production.

• Dispel the widespread idea that milk or eggs are in fact bad for your health.

• Run awareness building programmes to promote dietary diversity, including those for farmers who rear animals but do not necessarily consume animal protein.

• Carry out more research on biofortification to try and create more fortified foods.

Regional consultation in the Parjatan Motel, Rangpur, Rangpur Division on the 22nd of May 2017



• Promote online money transfers. • Establish care homes for elderly people

and SSNs should ensure they cover old vulnerable people.

• Strengthen school feeding programmes by incorporating milk and egg in what is offered. This should also be the case for

other food-based safety nets. • Extend zinc fortification to all the rice

distributed through SSNs. • Strengthen awareness building

programmes for improving dietary diversity of safety net beneficiaries.

Governance, cross policy implementation and FNS information

Food safety • Develop state-of-the-art laboratories that

can examine foods for heavy metals like lead and chromium.

• Ensure GAP, GMP, GHP and good practices in every step of the food chain.

• Educate people. Many are still unaware of the risks and you will find birds still slaughtered on the markets.

FNS information • Update database of farmers for various

purposes: fertiliser distribution, need for SSN programmes and other support provided by the Government.

• Modify some of the practices in slaughter houses for safer food. For example, animals should not be fed 48 hours before they are slaughtered as this can prevent salmonella contamination.

Regional consultation in Mymensingh Division on the 24th of May 2017, morning session A Deputy Director of the Mymensingh Department of Agriculture Extension chaired a session attended by 17 representatives of local public institutions. An official from the Mymensingh Department of Livestock Services was present as special guest.


• Stimulate organic farming with awareness and skills.

• Develop skill development centres in every upazila.

• Train small and medium farmers on nutrition.


• Stimulate organic farming by making quality inputs available.

• Update farmers' database to provide support for diversified production.

• Promote farmer groups to improve their bargaining power in marketing farm products.

• Make credit available at low interest rates for marginal farmers and without collateral for asset-less people.


• Develop appropriate food processing plants and centres to different types of foods e.g. fish, milk, meat and vegetables so that their micronutrients are preserved.

• Ensure availability of cold storage/chilling centres with modern technology for all perishable foods produced.


• Establish milk, egg, collecting centres, PHSC and modem slaughter houses in every upazila.

• Establish agro-based industries to add value to produce.

• Provide technology transfers and awareness training to households and farmers so that people understand safe ways to process food.

• Promote the development of nutritious foods through agro-based industries using local produce.

• Develop transport to help farmers distribute and sell their produce.

• Strengthen the formation of farmer cooperatives to ensure that they get the right value for their products. Cooperatives then need to be linked to growth centres.

• NGOs can also help farmers to form groups.


• Enhance media awareness on nutrition. • Carry out cooking demonstration on safe and

healthy recipes. • Strengthen nutrition training programmes.

• Provide nutrition education especially to local leaders and imams of mosques.

• Promote lamb meat which is an excellent source of protein. People need to be made aware. Chicken liver also could be promoted especially for pregnant women.


• Fortify food distributed in food safety nets with micronutrients. Also try to distribute more food items, including pulses and oil.

• Increase coverage of SSN beneficiaries and ensure to cater for particular groups of vulnerable people such as old people, tribal people, destitute women, those

living in the char lands and those affected by disaster.

• Ensure adequate social assistance during disasters, including distribution of processed/cooked foods.

• Establish old-homes for elderly people.

Governance, cross policy implementation and FNS information

Food waste • Establish agro-based industries to reduce wastage.

Food safety • Ensure that a central monitoring and

safety cell monitors safety of foods locally.

• Implement the Food Safety Act 2013 by ensuring the coordination of all stakeholders.

• Ensure GAP, GMP, GHP and good practices in every step of the food chain.

The consultation was attended by 29 professors from a host of Faculties and Departments of Bangladesh Agricultural University -agricultural economics, agriculture finance, medicine, horticulture, food technology and rural industries, agricultural extension education, soil science, agronomy, animal breeding and genetics, biotechnology, agribusiness and marketing, crop botany, fisheries technology, aquaculture, plant pathology- and scientists of the Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA) and Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute (BFRI). The Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology chaired the session.

Consultation in Mymensingh Division, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU) on the 24th of May 2017, afternoon session, with BAU academics



• Ensure protected wetlands for fisheries biodiversity conservation by MoFL as with MoEFC to sustain micronutrient-rich small fish production.

• Ensure sustainable crop security in haor and other areas as per need. For example, develop early cultivation of maturing rice varieties for disaster prone areas.

• Mechanise selected agricultural operations from planting to harvesting.

• Boost livestock production through training, technology transfer, demonstration and development of better livestock husbandry practices and quality inputs.

• Conserve and improve native livestock, genetic resources through selective breeding.

• Promote research and development of modern biotechnology to produce crop resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses.

• Enhance crop diversification using pulse e.g. lentil, oils and vegetables in addition of rice in disaster prone areas.

• Adopt region specific disaster response technologies through agricultural rehabilitation programmes: Early/submergence tolerance rice cultivars in flood/flash flood/cyclone prone areas; promotion of pulses and vegetable production using floating agriculture in flood prone and waterlogged areas; cultivation of salt-tolerant crop varieties in coastal areas; cultivation of drought tolerant crops in drought prone areas.


• Enhance value chain of aquaculture inputs such as seed, feed and drugs and chemicals.

• Improve water management through conservation, extraction and distribution of groundwater as well as rainwater for irrigation.

• Ensure eco-friendly sustainable land management through appropriate conservation practices.

• Ensure eco-friendly, sustainable land management through crop zoning.

• Conserve and develop high yielding fodder and natural herbs, probiotics for the production of safe animal products.


• Develop farm level storage capacity. • Develop women-led enterprise to

cook/process low value fish in indigenous ways for local consumers.

• Develop skills and build capacity of all stakeholders.

• Promote appropriate technology adoption for quality food and value addition.

• Fortify processed foods that are poor/low in nutrient e.g. potato chips, noodles, starch-based snacks.

• Ensure ethical and responsible marketing of products/investments.

• Establish ICT facilities at each step of the value chain.

• Develop nutritious foods using local produce.

• Strengthen the capacity in post-harvest handling infrastructure -transport, packaging, storage-.

• Improve facilities at the production catchments of fisheries resources.


• Build comprehensive awareness through media to promote balanced and healthy diets for all age groups.

• Show that added nutrition can be obtained through the consumption of certain processed foods. Since value addition means higher prices, people will be willing to spend more on products.

• Prime time television can be used e.g. cookery programmes and children's programmes as well as farmer demonstrations for healthy recipes, school programmes, education of local women leaders, religious leaders, etc.

• Sensitise consumers to avoid intake of excess salt and sugar rich foods.

• Ensure that all foods have nutrition information on their labels.



• Introduce cash-based social safety net programmes through mobile banking to reduce corruption.

• Introduce crop insurance programmes in disaster prone areas and for small and marginal farmers.

• Make food banks such as the SAARC one operational.

• Ensure economic and access to balanced/diversified foods at the time of disaster.

• Increase coverage and size of social safety net benefits for small and marginal farmers in climate hit areas.

• Introduce nutrition-sensitive SSNP for mothers, children and school going students.

• Conduct cooking demonstrations of safe and healthy recipes, correct cooking practices through safety net programmes.


Food loss and waste Food safety • Ensure safe food production system. • Develop methods to assess food losses

and food waste and reduce food loss and waste -quantitative and nutritional- at farm and postharvest stages.

• Recycle discarded vegetables in the city markets as animal feed.

• Use shrimp residues, such as the shell, which are very high in protein to fortify processed foods. 20,000 MT of shrimp shell waste is being produced every year and the country pays for it to be disposed of to avoid cross contamination.

• Need to implement preventive measures of quality assurance in order to prevent loss and waste. Otherwise checks only take place at the end of the value chain and foods thrown away if not up to the standards. This could be avoided.

• Develop GPS-based traceability to help ensure quality.

Governance • Reinforce coordination between all sectors

and stakeholders through strengthening national coordination bodies e.g. need one for food safety.

• Some genetically modified organism (GMO) products are already on the market, e.g. brinjal, and many are to be introduced shortly. It is essential that these products are labelled so that the consumer is aware and has the choice to consume GMOs or not.

• Implement and enforce the Food Safety Act.

• Carry out a Total Diets Study to identify and monitor contaminants in food.

• Raise awareness of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in agriculture and the environment.

• Introduce Good Aquaculture Practices,including GHP, GMP and HACCP compliance.

• Ensure the conformity of foods for consumption through the accreditation of certification agencies and laboratory services.

• Develop animal and poultry biosecurity facilities and measures to promote consumption of safe food.

• Produce safe fish through responsible aquaculture ensuring traceability from farm to fork for local and export markets.

• Promote food safety through fisheries and livestock extension services and farmer field schools.


Thirty-three participants, including 15 women, actively participated in this consultation.


• Address water scarcity and occasional flooding e.g. from flash floods. Sluice gate is required to prevent excess water.

• Given the high cost of producing rice in this region, promote other crops and vegetable farming.


• Develop the production of livestock feed. • Make more vaccines and medicine

available for livestock and train more manpower to handle livestock’s health.

• Increase crop intensity. • Set certain rules to ensure that the land

cannot be left fallow in a region where a lot of the land is owned by people living abroad and left fallow.

• Ensure the quality of fish seed.


• Develop more satellite clinics as in many wards, there are no community clinics and essential medicine is also often not available.

• Ensure the supply of safe water.


Food safety • Ensure safety in fisheries production.

Consultation with the private sector, CIRDAP on the 11th of July 2017 Twenty-nine members of the private sector participated in this consultation which was chaired by the Secretary General of the Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FBCCI). The chief guest was the President of this organisation and the FAO Representative ad interim in Bangladesh welcomed the participants. The following issues were flagged as essential to the improvement of FNS in the country.


Agricultural inputs and water resources • Provide interest-free or low interest credit

for community-based investments and big investments needed.

Animal source food • Poultry and dairy need more investment

given the fast-moving pace of these sectors.

• Develop livestock and poultry breeds by establishing artificial insemination laboratories.

• Invest in developing the technical process of breeding and in large-scale egg production.

• Encourage seed production which is lagging behind and often relies on imports.

• Promote quality cows for quality meat such as the Bahama species.

• Strengthen technical capacities to keep poultry farms and raise livestock.

• Introduce semi-intensive shrimp culture by providing training to farmers, adequate technology and credit.

• Promote biogas plants.

Regional rural consultation at Tuker Bazar, Sadar Upazila of Sylhet District, Sylhet Division on 25th of May 2017


• Provide incentives for agricultural entrepreneurs to stop them from leaving the sector.

• Highlight the difference between organic and hybrid food so that their price can be adapted.

• Develop the production of organic produce to increase the scope for exports.

• Improve standards of agriculture, fisheries and livestock produce to allow them to be exported.

• Provide training to improve agriculture. • Help develop and recognise the quality of

farm produce with certification of products.


• Develop the processing industry. • Establish agro-processing zones. • Develop processing plants for fish, fruits

and vegetables. • Remove constraints to investment through

the provision of improved infrastructure, education and training.

• Facilitate small-scale processing.

• Develop marketing abilities of small producers.

• Make information on how to export more widely and easily available.

• Strengthen SMEs through technical support and funding.

• Set up Agro Economic Zones for food processing similar to the existing Special Economic Zones.


• Investment is required on awareness creation of diet, health and nutrition.

• Train people on the importance of hygiene.


• Strengthen school feeding programmes with rice introduced in the mid-day meal.


Food safety • Provide training for farmers. • Form clusters and zones of farmers that will

pursue good agriculture practices and good

hygienic practices through maintenance of traceability.

Governance • Prepare the CIP2 in Bengali as well so that it

can be widely shared and promoted. • Closely involve the private sector in the

implementation of the CIP2. • Maintain continuous dialogue with FBCCI.

• Promote collaboration between district Chambers of Commerce and the private sector.

• Involve media in consultations. • Address the problem of food losses and

wastage.

Forty participants attended this consultation which was chaired by the FAO Representative ad interim and benefited from the presence of two chief guests from the Consumer Association of Bangladesh (CAB) and United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Following presentations by a Research Director from FPMU, GoB and the Chief Technical Advisor of the MUCH project and remarks by the two chief guests, the audience was split into five groups reflecting the five Areas for Investment of the CIP2 to provide comments on the draft CIP2. The participants reiterated the need

Consultation with the DPs, the UN, CSOs and academia, Bangabandhu International Conference Center on the 23rd of July 2017


to empower and include women in all areas of intervention of the CIP2. It was recommended that the latest 2012 Committee on World Food Security definition of food and nutrition security be referred to. The need to evaluate the impact of the CIP1 was raised. The importance of ensuring consistency between approaches at local level across the country and between national and sub-national level was also stressed. This exercise was very useful in identifying missing actors listed in the CIP2 as 'institutions involved'. Issues that arose specific to each area for investment were as follows:


• Need to measure the nutritional quality of the crops produced and developed to ensure the focus is not only on yields.

• Develop capacity and training to improve water management.

• Ensure the focus is not only on small fish.

• Use saline water to farm fish. • Make use of canals and reservoirs for fish

farming. • Mention that animal source foods increase

bioavailability of micronutrients from other foods.

Efficient and nutrition-sensitive post-harvest transformation and value addition

• Give special attention to access to export markers for agro-processing industries.

• Expand the creation of MSMEs in hard-to-reach areas.

• Urgently ensure fair prices for producers. • Carry out more research on different value

chains. • Ensure maternity protection.


• Stress the importance of animal source foods for vulnerable people.

• Include nutritious foods in the food that is distributed e.g. dried fish, pulses or processed foods.

• Focus on the urban vulnerable groups which are ever-growing due to migration to the cities by those looking for new economic opportunities and by those that have lost their land due to environmental disasters.

• Ensure move towards cash only programmes is appropriate in all circumstances.

• Add adolescent girls to the title of sub-programme IV.2.1.

• Make sure that The Breast-Milk Substitutes, Infant Foods, Commercially Manufactured Complementary Foods and the Accessories Thereof (Regulation of Marketing) Act 2013 is respected.

Strengthened enabling environment and cross-cutting programmes for achieving food and nutrition security

Food safety and hygiene • Create a demand for food safety and

hygiene needs through awareness raising. • Involve CAB in developing such demand. • Develop labelling to reflect compliance

with BSTI standards and BFSA rules on allergens.

Improved information and data • Expand types of data to consider. • Take into account the National Strategy

for Development of Statistics.

• Ensure traceability of produce to ensure

food safety. • Invest in research.

• Create database not only of quantity of food available but also nutrients.


Improved FNS governance, capacity strengthening and leadership • Encourage the role of coordination by the

BNNC. • Link BFSLN to the relevant authorities

such as the BSTI. • Ensure the LCG FS & ARD is more active

and that decisions taken by ERD are followed up.

• Develop a LCG for social protection to help effectively communicate with the GoB’s Central Management Committee on SSNs.

The Ministry of Food organised a Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection in collaboration with the MUCH project, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Food Programme (WFP), IFPRI, and Save the Children, at Le Meridian hotel, Dhaka. This meeting was the second series of national symposia focusing on nutrition-sensitive approaches and was attended by some 140 representatives of the Government, UN agencies, international and national NGOs, academia, private sector, donor communities and media on the 4th and 5th of December.

On the 4th of December, Ms. Meher Afroze Churnki, MP, Honourable State Minister for Women and Children Affairs was the chief guest of the symposium. Mr. David Westerling, Deputy Director, USAID and Mr. Manfred Fernholz, Acting Head of Cooperation, Delegation of the European Union (EU) to Bangladesh were present as special guests. Ms. Christa Räder, Representative, WFP, Mr. Edouard Beigbeder, Representative, UNICEF, Mr. David Doolan, Representative ad interim in Bangladesh, FAO were present as guests of honour. Mr. Md. Kaikobad Hossain, Secretary, Ministry of Food was the chairperson.

On the 5th, three technical sessions and a panel discussion were held. The session started with the overview of nutrition-sensitive social protection: national perspectives, followed by lessons learned: how evidences were effectively used to form national policies, opportunities for nutrition-sensitive social protection where the role of private sector and the role of social protection in fragile context were highlighted. The last session was a panel discussion on how Bangladesh social protection system can be more nutrition-sensitive in order to improve FNS. The following key issues, points and

recommendations were raised:

Reform of the current social protection system

• Improve governance, transparency and accountability at all levels.

• Invest in data systems e.g. a single registry. • Strengthen the G2P payment system. • Strengthen grievance redress system. • Increase the transfer amount of the current

social safety net programmes to have meaningful impacts.

• Ensure funding for social protection programmes to prepare and to be responsive for crises -contingency funds-.

• Scale up the existing social protection programmes in times of crises and create linkages between social protection in humanitarian context and longer-term approaches to livelihoods, resilience, FNS.

• Develop insurance schemes to support community to build resilience to prepare and to respond to natural disasters.

• Increase partnerships between public, private and non-state actors.

• Implement progressive taxation and ensure predictability of financial streams.

• Extend the government policy to provide six months paid maternity leave to private sector's workers.

Technical Symposium on Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection, le Meridian Dhaka on 4th and 5th of December 2017


Coordination

• Create institutional mechanisms and coordination within multi-sectoral approach -health, agriculture, water and sanitation and education-, and at different levels.

• Strengthen the capacity of the Department of Social Services (DSS) under the Ministry of Social Welfare to lead coordination from 2026.

Nutrition-sensitive social protection

• Aim for a universal coverage of all the nutrition-sensitive social protection programmes as malnutrition and poverty both are widespread.

• Target the nutritionally vulnerable population and establish key beneficiaries’ groups: children under 4 -especially the first 1,000 days-, pregnant women, lactating women, adolescent girls; urban populations, persons with disabilities and other marginalised groups.

• Advocate for the integration of nutrition, food security, gender in social protection legislation and policy frameworks, including objectives and indicators.

• Strengthen social protection linkages with activities and programmes that deliver nutrition, food security and WASH services.

• Support the generation of evidence on how social protection policies and programmes affect nutrition outcomes.

Improvement of nutritional status

• Provide fortified rice to workers and iron tablets for female workers.

•• Place a nutritionist in every factory.

Promote community-based nutrition programme.

•• Establish breastfeeding spaces in factories.

Provide free medical services for female workers and their children.

• Provide awareness training to address malnutrition for workers via digital and print media.

• Strengthen dietary knowledge among the entire population.

• Support the implementation of the NNS Operational Plan managed by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

• Mobilise resources and ensure

durability/longevity of projects for sustained positive effects on food and nutrition security.

• Incorporate an intensive high-quality BCC in social protection programmes, more specifically in social safety programmes that provide a sufficient transfer amount to make impacts -1,500 tk/mth/hh from the result of the Transfer Modality Research Initiative (TMRI)-. This has been proven to reduce stunting in the TMRI tested areas.

• Provide BCC and nutrition education to both women and men.

• Enhance the quality of nutrition services and other services such as health, water and sanitation.

• Use other mechanisms -school feeding, VGD- as vehicles for micronutrients supplementation to address hidden hunger.

• Make healthy cooking part of nutrition education.

• Focus on the youth for dietary diversity education.

• Support universities to have nutrition courses in graduate programmes.

• Involve farmers as educators. • Increase investment on nutrition -only 3

percent of the Country Investment Plan 2015-16 was on nutrition-.

• Agree on key indicators to track not only the outcomes but also progress of nutritional status.


Ann

ex 3

. Syn

thes

is o

f rec

omm

enda

tions

and

link

s to

the

CIP

2 pr

ogra

mm

es a

nd s

ub-p

rogr

amm

es

Pilla

r

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

D

haka

GoB

, DPs

, CSO

s R

egio

nal /

aca

dem

ia

Farm

ers

st ei d yhtl aeh r of kcotsevil dna seirehsif , er utl ucir ga el bani at sus dna deifi srevi D .I

Use

land

map

ping

and

zo

ning

R

esea

rch

fund

ing

O

rgan

ic p

rodu

ce

Stan

dard

s C

ertif

icat

ion

Tr

aini

ng

Mea

sure

the

nutri

tiona

l qu

ality

of t

he fo

od

prod

uced

Use

land

map

ping

and

zon

ing

usin

g G

IS

Hig

h va

lue

and

dive

rse

crop

s Pr

omot

e lo

cal p

rodu

ce

Mec

hani

satio

n an

d te

chno

logy

tra

nsfe

r En

cour

age

certa

in c

ropp

ing

patte

rns

Org

anic

farm

ing

Labo

ur sh

orta

ges

Incr

ease

cro

p in

tens

ity

Cre

atin

g O

ppor

tuni

ties

for S

usta

inab

le

Agr

icul

ture

and

Gre

en

Gro

wth

A

pplic

atio

n of

Sci

ence

an

d Te

chno

logy

for

high

er le

vels

of F

ood

Prod

uctio

n

Agr

icul

tura

l Res

earc

h Pr

omot

ing

agric

ultu

ral

dive

rsifi

catio

n an

d ex

pans

ion

of

Hor

ticul

tura

l Cro

ps

Prom

ote

smal

lhol

der

dairy

farm

ing

inte

grat

ed

with

cro

p an

d fis

h cu

lture

Fa

rm M

echa

niza

tion

Mai

nstre

amin

g W

omen

in

Agr

icul

ture

B

io-C

ontro

l of P

est

Pres

erve

agr

icul

tura

l la

nd a

nd e

nsur

e pr

oduc

tion

grow

th fo

r fo

od se

curit

y w

ith

min

imum

env

ironm

enta

l de

grad

atio

n M

akin

g fo

od p

rodu

ctio

n ef

ficie

nt a

nd su

stai

nabl

e St

reng

then

ing

agric

ultu

ral

dive

rsifi

catio

n La

nd z

onin

g fo

r su

stai

nabl

e la

nd/w

ater

us

e co

mpl

eted

1.2

By

2030

, red

uce

at le

ast b

y ha

lf th

e pr

opor

tion

of m

en,

wom

en a

nd c

hild

ren

of a

ll ag

es

livin

g in

pov

erty

in a

ll its

di

men

sion

s acc

ordi

ng to

na

tiona

l def

initi

on

2.3

By

2030

, dou

ble

the

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ctiv

ity a

nd

inco

mes

of s

mal

l-sca

le fo

od

prod

ucer

s, in

par

ticul

ar

wom

en, i

ndig

enou

s peo

ples

, fa

mily

farm

ers,

past

oral

ists

and

fis

hers

, inc

ludi

ng th

roug

h se

cure

and

equ

al a

cces

s to

land

, ot

her p

rodu

ctiv

e re

sour

ces a

nd

inpu

ts, k

now

ledg

e, fi

nanc

ial

serv

ices

, mar

kets

and

op

portu

nitie

s for

val

ue a

dditi

on

and

non-

farm

em

ploy

men

t 5.

5 En

sure

wom

en’s

full

and

effe

ctiv

e pa

rtici

patio

n an

d eq

ual o

ppor

tuni

ties f

or

lead

ersh

ip a

t all

leve

ls o

f de

cisi

on-m

akin

g in

pol

itica

l, ec

onom

ic a

nd p

ublic

life

I.1

Sust

aina

ble

inte

nsifi

catio

n an

d di

vers

ifica

tion

of

crop

-bas

ed

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

s

I.1.1

. Enh

ance

ag

ricul

tura

l re

sear

ch a

nd

know

ledg

e,

and

tech

nolo

gy

deve

lopm

ent

for m

ore

prod

uctiv

e,

dive

rse,

su

stai

nabl

e an

d nu

tritio

n-

sens

itive

ag

ricul

ture


Pilla

r

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

n.

C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Sub-

pr

ogra

mm

es

Dha

ka G

oB, D

Ps, C

SOs

Reg

iona

l / a

cade

mia

Fa

rmer

s st ei d yhtl aeh r of kcotsevil dna seirehsif , er utl ucir ga el bani at sus dna deifi srevi D .I

Ada

pt to

clim

ate

chan

ge

Bio

gas p

lant

de

velo

pmen

t

Trai

ning

of f

arm

ers

Forti

fied

varie

ties

Cro

p re

sist

ant t

o bi

otic

and

ab

iotic

stre

sses

R

egio

n sp

ecifi

c re

spon

se

tech

nolo

gies

thro

ugh

agric

ultu

ral

reha

bilit

atio

n pr

ogra

mm

es

Trai

ning

of f

arm

ers

espe

cial

ly th

e m

ost

vuln

erab

le

Prom

otio

n of

Pre

cisi

on

Agr

icul

ture

R

educ

e po

tent

ial

econ

omic

loss

es d

ue to

C

limat

e C

hang

e A

ddre

ssin

g K

now

ledg

e G

ap to

Impr

ove

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Agr

icul

tura

l dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t C

limat

e C

hang

e an

d di

sast

er ri

sk re

duct

ion

2.4

By

2030

, ens

ure

sust

aina

ble

food

pro

duct

ion

syst

ems a

nd im

plem

ent

resi

lient

agr

icul

tura

l pra

ctic

es

that

incr

ease

pro

duct

ivity

and

pr

oduc

tion,

that

hel

p m

aint

ain

ecos

yste

ms,

that

stre

ngth

en

capa

city

for a

dapt

atio

n to

cl

imat

e ch

ange

, ext

rem

e w

eath

er, d

roug

ht, f

lood

ing

and

othe

r dis

aste

rs a

nd th

at

prog

ress

ivel

y im

prov

e la

nd a

nd

soil

qual

ity

13.1

Stre

ngth

en re

silie

nce

and

adap

tive

capa

city

to c

limat

e-

rela

ted

haza

rds a

nd n

atur

al

disa

ster

s in

all c

ount

ries

I.1.2

. Dev

elop

te

chno

logi

es

incl

udin

g bi

otec

hnol

ogie

s an

d m

easu

res

to a

dapt

ag

ricul

tura

l sy

stem

s to

clim

ate

chan

ge

N

utrie

nt ta

rget

s In

cent

ives

for g

row

ing

certa

in

crop

s IC

Ts fo

r adv

isor

y se

rvic

es

Hor

ticul

ture

exp

ansi

on

Link

s bet

wee

n ex

tens

ion

and

mar

kets

N

utrit

ion

train

ing

for f

arm

ers

Skill

dev

elop

men

t cen

ters

Prom

ote

crop

s tha

t ar

e ad

apte

d to

are

a A

gric

ultu

ral E

xten

sion

M

ains

tream

ing

Wom

en

in A

gric

ultu

re

Rur

al H

uman

R

esou

rces

Dev

elop

men

t Ex

tens

ion

syst

em

thro

ugh

ICTs

Pr

omot

ing

agric

ultu

re

thro

ugh

ICT

Acc

ess t

o m

arke

ts a

nd

prod

uctiv

e as

sets

(lan

d,

seed

s, fe

rtiliz

ers a

nd

exte

nsio

n se

rvic

es) b

y w

omen

2.3

See

abov

e 2.

A In

crea

se in

vest

men

t, in

clud

ing

thro

ugh

enha

nced

in

tern

atio

nal c

oope

ratio

n, in

ru

ral i

nfra

stru

ctur

e, a

gric

ultu

ral

rese

arch

and

ext

ensi

on

serv

ices

, tec

hnol

ogy

deve

lopm

ent a

nd p

lant

and

liv

esto

ck g

ene

bank

s in

orde

r to

enha

nce

agric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ctiv

e ca

paci

ty in

dev

elop

ing

coun

tries

, in

parti

cula

r lea

st

deve

lope

d co

untri

es

I.1

.3. I

mpr

ove

and

expa

nd

nutri

tion-

se

nsiti

ve

exte

nsio

n pr

ogra

mm

es

and

agric

ultu

ral

advi

sory

se

rvic

es


Pilla

r

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

D

haka

GoB

, DPs

, CSO

s R

egio

nal /

aca

dem

ia

Farm

ers

st ei d yhtl aeh r of kcotsevil dna seirehsif , er utl ucir ga el bani at sus dna deifi srevi D .I B

ette

r fis

h se

ed q

ualit

y B

ette

r qua

lity

inpu

ts th

at

have

bee

n te

sted

Se

ed d

evel

opm

ent

Trai

ning

N

o or

low

-inte

rest

cre

dit

for c

omm

unity

-bas

ed

inve

stm

ents

B

ig in

vest

men

ts

Dom

estic

seed

pr

oduc

tion

Ani

mal

med

icin

e R

esis

tanc

e to

ant

ibio

tics

Qua

lity,

safe

, aff

orda

ble

fish

feed

Ec

o-fr

iend

ly in

puts

H

igh

yiel

ding

fodd

er a

nd n

atur

al

herb

s, pr

obio

tics f

or th

e pr

oduc

tion

of sa

fe a

nim

al

prod

ucts

Upa

zila

bas

ed fi

sh

seed

mul

tiplic

atio

n an

d di

strib

utio

n A

dequ

ate

med

icin

e an

d m

edic

al c

are

for

anim

als

Qua

lity

affo

rdab

le

anim

al fe

ed

Qua

lity

seed

s

Agr

icul

tura

l Inp

uts-

Se

eds a

nd F

ertil

izer

s A

gric

ultu

ral C

redi

t A

cces

s to

mar

kets

and

pr

oduc

tive

asse

ts (l

and,

se

eds,

ferti

lizer

s and

ex

tens

ion

serv

ices

) by

wom

en

2.3

See

abov

e 2.

5 B

y 20

20, m

aint

ain

the

gene

tic d

iver

sity

of s

eeds

, cu

ltiva

ted

plan

ts a

nd fa

rmed

an

d do

mes

ticat

ed a

nim

als a

nd

thei

r rel

ated

wild

spec

ies,

incl

udin

g th

roug

h so

undl

y m

anag

ed a

nd d

iver

sifie

d se

ed

and

plan

t ban

ks a

t the

nat

iona

l, re

gion

al a

nd in

tern

atio

nal

leve

ls, a

nd p

rom

ote

acce

ss to

an

d fa

ir an

d eq

uita

ble

shar

ing

of b

enef

its a

risin

g fr

om th

e ut

iliza

tion

of g

enet

ic re

sour

ces

and

asso

ciat

ed tr

aditi

onal

kn

owle

dge,

as i

nter

natio

nally

ag

reed

5.

A U

nder

take

refo

rms t

o gi

ve

wom

en e

qual

righ

ts to

ec

onom

ic re

sour

ces,

as w

ell a

s ac

cess

to o

wne

rshi

p an

d co

ntro

l ove

r lan

d an

d ot

her

form

s of p

rope

rty, f

inan

cial

se

rvic

es, i

nher

itanc

e an

d na

tura

l res

ourc

es, i

n ac

cord

ance

with

nat

iona

l law

s

I.2

Impr

oved

acc

ess,

qual

ity a

nd

man

agem

ent o

f ag

ricul

tura

l in

puts

, inc

ludi

ng

wat

er a

nd la

nd

I.2.1

. Enh

ance

av

aila

bilit

y an

d ef

ficie

nt u

se o

f af

ford

able

and

qu

ality

inpu

ts

(see

ds,

ferti

liser

s, pe

stic

ides

) and

cr

edit

for s

afe

and

dive

rsifi

ed

crop

s

G

ood

qual

ity su

stai

nabl

e fe

rtilis

ers a

nd p

estic

ides

Pr

even

t los

s of a

rabl

e la

nd

Ecof

riend

ly p

ract

ices

and

su

stai

nabl

e la

nd m

anag

emen

t R

esea

rch

to p

rese

rve

soil

ferti

lity

Mai

ntai

n so

il he

alth

thro

ugh

cons

erva

tion

agric

ultu

re b

ioch

ar

and

bios

lurr

y So

il te

stin

g to

mat

ch c

rops

to

soil

Dat

abas

e de

velo

ped

for f

ertil

iser

di

strib

utio

n

Issu

e of

land

left

fallo

w b

y ow

ners

th

at a

re a

broa

d

Agr

icul

tura

l Inp

uts-

Se

eds a

nd F

ertil

izer

s B

io-C

ontro

l of P

est

Enga

ge th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

in v

ario

us fa

cets

of

gre

en g

row

th

Effic

ienc

y of

land

m

arke

ts, r

educ

tion

of

land

dis

pute

s and

pr

otec

tion

of th

e po

or’s

rig

hts t

hrou

gh IC

Ts

2.4

See

abov

e

I.2.2

. Pre

serv

e ag

ricul

tura

l lan

d fe

rtilit

y an

d es

tabl

ish

land

rig

hts o

f mos

t vu

lner

able

po

pula

tions


Pilla

r st ei d yhtl aeh r of kcotsevil dna seirehsif , er utl ucir ga el bani at sus dna deifi srevi D .I

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

Dha

ka G

oB, D

Ps, C

SOs

Reg

iona

l / a

cade

mia

Fa

rmer

s A

sses

s lev

el o

f irr

igat

ion

need

ed fo

r di

ffer

ent c

rops

C

apac

ity d

evel

opm

ent

and

train

ing

Use

can

als/

rese

rvoi

rs

for f

ish

farm

ing

Wat

er m

anag

emen

t thr

ough

co

nser

vatio

n, e

xtra

ctio

n an

d di

strib

utio

n of

gro

undw

ater

as

wel

l as r

ainw

ater

for i

rrig

atio

n

Wat

er sc

arci

ty

Wat

er h

arve

stin

g R

iver

dre

dgin

g,

cana

ls

Bur

ied

wat

er

pipe

line

irrig

atio

n

Use

of W

ater

Res

ourc

es

and

Wat

er E

cono

my

Red

ucin

g gr

ound

wat

er

depe

nden

ce

6.4

By

2030

, sub

stan

tially

in

crea

se w

ater

-use

eff

icie

ncy

acro

ss a

ll se

ctor

s and

ens

ure

sust

aina

ble

with

draw

als a

nd

supp

ly o

f fre

shw

ater

to a

ddre

ss

wat

er sc

arci

ty a

nd su

bsta

ntia

lly

redu

ce th

e nu

mbe

r of p

eopl

e su

ffer

ing

from

wat

er sc

arci

ty

Use

salin

e w

ater

for f

ish

farm

ing

Wat

er sa

linis

atio

n D

ams

Dev

elop

fish

cul

tivat

ion

whe

re

salin

e w

ater

has

intru

ded

Salin

ity o

f wat

er

and

land

Sl

uice

gat

es

Agr

icul

ture

in th

e ne

wly

acc

rete

d C

oast

al

Land

and

Mar

ine

Isla

nds

Hol

d w

ater

of w

etla

nds

incl

udin

g ja

lmoh

als a

nd

river

s in

dry

seas

on

Stan

dard

s A

nim

al so

urce

food

s in

crea

se b

ioav

aila

bilit

y

Farm

ers’

and

ext

ensi

on

wor

kers

’ tra

inin

g G

over

nmen

t tra

inin

g

Trai

ning

for

farm

ers

Impr

ove

Gov

ernm

ent

train

ing

Ope

n w

ater

fish

erie

s m

anag

emen

t In

land

aqu

acul

ture

O

rgan

izat

ion

of

fishe

rmen

into

su

stai

nabl

e co

mm

unity

- ba

sed

orga

niza

tions

that

w

ill m

anag

e kh

as

jolm

ohal

Not

focu

s onl

y on

smal

l fis

h Fi

sh c

ultiv

atio

n R

esto

re lo

cal v

arie

ties o

f fis

h En

sure

pro

tect

ed w

etla

nds f

or

fishe

ries b

iodi

vers

ity

cons

erva

tion

Ec

olog

ical

ly C

ritic

al

Are

as (E

CA

s) &

W

etla

nds m

anag

emen

t Pu

rebr

ed b

rood

fish

of

com

mer

cial

ly im

porta

nt

indi

geno

us fi

sh sp

ecie

s m

aint

aine

d

n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

I.2

.3. I

mpr

ove

wat

er

man

agem

ent

thro

ugh

cons

erva

tion,

su

stai

nabl

e ex

tract

ion

and

dist

ribut

ion

of

grou

nd w

ater

an

d ef

ficie

nt

use

of su

rfac

e w

ater

for

irrig

atio

n I.2

.4. M

itiga

te

the

effe

cts o

f sa

line

wat

er

intru

sion

and

its

impa

ct o

n fo

od

prod

uctio

n an

d im

plic

atio

ns

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

I.3

Enha

nced

pr

oduc

tivity

and

su

stai

nabl

e pr

oduc

tion

of

anim

al so

urce

fo

ods

I.3.1

. Im

prov

e m

anag

emen

t of

fishe

ries,

lives

tock

and

po

ultry

to

incr

ease

pr

oduc

tion

and

prod

uctiv

ity

and

nutri

tiona

l va

lue

whi

le

ensu

ring

sust

aina

bilit

y I.3

.2. S

usta

in

mic

ronu

trien

t- ric

h an

imal

fo

od p

rodu

ctio

n th

roug

h co

nser

ving

fis

herie

s and

liv

esto

ck

biod

iver

sity


To

whi

ch S

DG

targ

ets i

t Pi

llar I. seirehsif , er utl ucir ga el bani at sus dna deifi srevi Dst ei d yhtl aeh r of kcotsevil dna

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

Dha

ka G

oB, D

Ps, C

SOs

Reg

iona

l / a

cade

mia

Fa

rmer

s Se

mi i

nten

sive

shrim

p cu

lture

St

anda

rds

Cer

tific

atio

n

Shrim

p pr

oduc

tion

Shrim

p fa

rmin

g Pr

omot

ion

of d

iffer

ent

met

hods

of a

quac

ultu

re

depe

ndin

g on

suita

bilit

y In

trodu

ctio

n of

SPF

sh

rimp

by p

rivat

e se

ctor

fa

cilit

ated

by

the

Gov

ernm

ent

14.2

By

2020

, sus

tain

ably

m

anag

e an

d pr

otec

t mar

ine

and

coas

tal e

cosy

stem

s to

avoi

d si

gnifi

cant

adv

erse

im

pact

s, in

clud

ing

by

stre

ngth

enin

g th

eir r

esili

ence

, an

d ta

ke a

ctio

n fo

r the

ir re

stor

atio

n in

ord

er to

ach

ieve

he

alth

y an

d pr

oduc

tive

ocea

ns

Incr

ease

pro

duct

ivity

an

d im

prov

e st

anda

rds

Nut

rient

targ

ets

Inve

stm

ents

-in

fras

truct

ure,

trai

ning

- in

pou

ltry

and

dairy

gi

ven

the

fast

gro

wth

of

thes

e se

ctor

s La

rge

scal

e eg

g pr

oduc

tion

Arti

ficia

l ins

emin

atio

n la

bora

torie

s B

reed

ing

Qua

lity

cow

s tha

t pr

oduc

e a

lot o

f mea

t C

ertif

icat

ion

Org

anic

pro

duce

Supp

ort a

rtific

ial i

nsem

inat

ion

Con

serv

e an

d im

prov

e na

tive

lives

tock

, gen

etic

reso

urce

s th

roug

h ge

netic

s, br

eedi

ng a

nd

repr

oduc

tive

biot

echn

olog

y

Supp

ort a

rtific

ial

inse

min

atio

n D

evel

op li

vest

ock

exte

nsio

n Pr

omot

ing

agric

ultu

re

thro

ugh

ICT

Bre

ed d

evel

opm

ent,

lives

tock

rese

arch

Fe

eds,

Fodd

er a

nd

Ani

mal

Man

agem

ent

Vet

erin

ary

Serv

ices

and

A

nim

al H

ealth

M

arke

ting

of A

nim

al

Prod

ucts

and

Val

ue

Cha

in D

evel

opm

ent

Acc

ess t

o cr

edit

Mai

nstre

amin

g W

omen

in

Agr

icul

ture

1.2

See

abov

e 2.

3 Se

e ab

ove

5.5

See

abov

e

n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

I.3.3

. St

reng

then

su

stai

nabl

e sh

rimp

aqua

cultu

re,

mar

ine

fishe

ries a

nd

farm

ing

syst

ems

adap

ted

to

geog

raph

ical

zo

nes

I.3.4

. Im

prov

e fis

herie

s, liv

esto

ck a

nd

poul

try h

ealth

se

rvic

es,

qual

ity in

puts

an

d su

rvei

llanc

e


Pi

llar

R

ecom

men

datio

ns fr

om c

onsu

ltatio

ns

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s

To

whi

ch S

DG

targ

ets i

t con

trib

utes

n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

D

haka

GoB

, DPs

, CSO

s R

egio

nal /

aca

dem

ia

Farm

ers

noitirt un dna t nei ciff E .II-sensitive post-noiti dda eul av dna noit a mr ofsnart t sevrah

Trai

ning

for f

ood

proc

essi

ng a

nd

pres

erva

tion

Mar

ketin

g ab

ilitie

s of

smal

l pro

duce

rs

SME

stre

ngth

enin

g th

roug

h te

chni

cal

supp

ort a

nd fu

ndin

g M

ater

nity

pro

tect

ion

Prom

ote

prod

uctiv

e as

set

trans

fers

to p

oor p

eopl

e to

en

cour

age

inco

me

gene

ratio

n Fe

mal

e pa

rtici

patio

n

Milk

pr

eser

vatio

n sy

stem

s

Incr

ease

d pr

oduc

tivity

, acc

ess t

o fin

ance

, and

pol

icy

supp

ort f

or u

rban

M

SMEs

B

oost

ing

Agr

o-

Proc

essi

ng In

dust

ries

Val

ue C

hain

D

evel

opm

ent

Rur

al E

mpl

oym

ent

Gen

erat

ion

and

Pove

rty R

educ

tion

Prom

otin

g ag

ro-

proc

essi

ng a

nd sm

all-

scal

e ru

ral e

nter

pris

e Em

ploy

men

t- ge

nera

ting

inco

me

grow

th

Safe

and

qua

lity

food

su

pply

R

ural

dev

elop

men

t an

d no

n-fa

rm

econ

omic

act

iviti

es

Mar

keta

ble

tech

nica

l an

d vo

catio

nal

educ

atio

n in

clud

ing

ICT

for w

omen

D

iver

sific

atio

n of

m

anuf

actu

ring

and

focu

s on

SMEs

Po

ultry

indu

stry

de

velo

pmen

t

1.2

By

2030

, red

uce

at le

ast b

y ha

lf th

e pr

opor

tion

of m

en, w

omen

and

chi

ldre

n of

al

l age

s liv

ing

in p

over

ty in

all

its

dim

ensi

ons a

ccor

ding

to n

atio

nal d

efin

ition

2.

3 B

y 20

30, d

oubl

e th

e ag

ricul

tura

l pr

oduc

tivity

and

inco

mes

of s

mal

l-sca

le

food

pro

duce

rs, i

n pa

rticu

lar w

omen

, in

dige

nous

peo

ples

, fam

ily fa

rmer

s, pa

stor

alis

ts a

nd fi

sher

s, in

clud

ing

thro

ugh

secu

re a

nd e

qual

acc

ess t

o la

nd, o

ther

pr

oduc

tive

reso

urce

s and

inpu

ts, k

now

ledg

e,

finan

cial

serv

ices

, mar

kets

and

opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r val

ue a

dditi

on a

nd n

on-f

arm

em

ploy

men

t 2.

c A

dopt

mea

sure

s to

ensu

re th

e pr

oper

fu

nctio

ning

of f

ood

com

mod

ity m

arke

ts a

nd

thei

r der

ivat

ives

and

faci

litat

e tim

ely

acce

ss

to m

arke

t inf

orm

atio

n, in

clud

ing

on fo

od

rese

rves

, in

orde

r to

help

lim

it ex

trem

e fo

od p

rice

vola

tility

5.

5 En

sure

wom

en’s

full

and

effe

ctiv

e pa

rtici

patio

n an

d eq

ual o

ppor

tuni

ties

for

lead

ersh

ip a

t all

leve

ls o

f dec

isio

n-m

akin

g in

pol

itica

l, ec

onom

ic a

nd p

ublic

life

8.

3 Pr

omot

e de

velo

pmen

t-orie

nted

pol

icie

s th

at su

ppor

t pro

duct

ive

activ

ities

, dec

ent j

ob

crea

tion,

ent

repr

eneu

rshi

p, c

reat

ivity

and

in

nova

tion,

and

enc

oura

ge th

e fo

rmal

izat

ion

and

grow

th o

f mic

ro-,

smal

l- an

d m

ediu

m-

size

d en

terp

rises

, inc

ludi

ng th

roug

h ac

cess

to

fina

ncia

l ser

vice

s 9.

3 In

crea

se th

e ac

cess

of s

mal

l-sca

le

indu

stria

l and

oth

er e

nter

pris

es, i

n pa

rticu

lar

in d

evel

opin

g co

untri

es, t

o fin

anci

al

serv

ices

, inc

ludi

ng a

ffor

dabl

e cr

edit,

and

th

eir i

nteg

ratio

n in

to v

alue

cha

ins a

nd

mar

kets

12

.3 B

y 20

30, h

alve

per

cap

ita g

loba

l foo

d w

aste

at t

he re

tail

and

cons

umer

leve

ls a

nd

redu

ce fo

od lo

sses

alo

ng p

rodu

ctio

n an

d su

pply

cha

ins,

incl

udin

g po

st-h

arve

st lo

sses

II.1

Stre

ngth

ened

po

st-h

arve

st

valu

e ch

ain

with

par

ticul

ar

focu

s on

MSM

Es

(sto

rage

, pr

oces

sing

, br

andi

ng,

labe

lling

, m

arke

ting

and

trade

)

II.1.

1. D

evel

op

skill

s and

st

reng

then

ca

paci

ty to

pr

oces

s and

su

pply

safe

and

nu

trien

t-ric

h fo

ods w

ith

emph

asis

on

qual

ity st

anda

rds

and

nutri

ent

labe

lling

in

form

atio

n


n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

II.1.

2. A

dopt

ap

prop

riate

te

chno

logy

and

st

reng

then

in

fras

truct

ure

to

allo

w q

ualit

y im

prov

emen

t, va

lue

addi

tion

and

forti

ficat

ion

of

food

s

II.1.

3. M

obili

se

and

prom

ote

prod

ucer

and

m

arke

ting

grou

ps

for i

mpr

oved

m

arke

t acc

ess

and

barg

aini

ng

pow

er,

espe

cial

ly fo

r w

omen

and

sm

allh

olde

rs

II.2

Impr

oved

ac

cess

to

mar

kets

, fa

cilit

ies

and

info

rmat

ion

II.2.

1. Im

prov

e m

arke

t in

fras

truct

ures

, ph

ysic

al a

cces

s to

m

arke

t fa

cilit

ies

II.2.

2. S

treng

then

pr

ivat

e se

ctor

pa

rtici

patio

n an

d pu

blic

priv

ate

partn

ersh

ips

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

Dha

ka G

oB, D

Ps, C

SOs

Reg

iona

l / a

cade

mia

Fa

rmer

s

Smal

l-sca

le p

roce

ssin

g A

gro-

proc

essi

ng z

ones

Fi

sh, f

ruits

and

veg

etab

le

proc

essi

ng p

lant

s En

sure

fair

pric

es fo

r pr

oduc

ers

Res

earc

h on

val

ue c

hain

s

Coo

pera

tives

and

farm

ers’

or

gani

satio

ns

Wom

en-le

d en

terp

rise

to

cook

/pro

cess

food

s for

loca

l co

nsum

ers

Ethi

cal a

nd re

spon

sibl

e m

arke

ting

Milk

pr

oduc

tion

club

s

Agr

icul

ture

val

ue

chai

n de

velo

pmen

t th

roug

h co

oper

ativ

es

Stre

ngth

enin

g of

C

oope

rativ

e M

ovem

ent

Mem

bers

hip

and

lead

ersh

ip in

as

soci

atio

ns a

nd

deci

sion

-mak

ing

foru

ms f

or w

omen

5.5

See

abov

e

Info

rmat

ion

on e

xpor

t op

tions

In

nova

tion

and

rese

arch

on

app

ropr

iate

te

chno

logi

es

Met

hods

of p

roce

ssin

g m

icro

nutri

ent-r

ich

food

s Sh

orte

r val

ue c

hain

s

Stor

age

Esta

blis

hmen

t of l

ocal

agr

o-

base

d pr

oces

sing

indu

strie

s Lo

w c

ost p

acka

ging

A

ppro

pria

te te

chno

logy

ad

optio

n fo

r qua

lity

food

and

va

lue

addi

tion

Forti

fy p

roce

ssed

food

s

B

oost

ing

Agr

o-

Proc

essi

ng In

dust

ries

Val

ue C

hain

D

evel

opm

ent

Mar

ketin

g of

Ani

mal

Pr

oduc

ts a

nd V

alue

C

hain

Dev

elop

men

t Pr

omot

e pr

oces

sing

an

d m

arke

ting

of m

ilk

and

milk

pro

duct

s, th

roug

h co

oper

ativ

es

2.3

See

abov

e 8.

2 A

chie

ve h

ighe

r lev

els o

f ec

onom

ic p

rodu

ctiv

ity th

roug

h di

vers

ifica

tion,

tech

nolo

gica

l up

grad

ing

and

inno

vatio

n, in

clud

ing

thro

ugh

a fo

cus o

n hi

gh-v

alue

add

ed

and

labo

ur-in

tens

ive

sect

ors

12.3

See

abo

ve

Prev

ent d

isto

rtion

s cr

eate

d by

mid

dle

men

Id

entif

y bo

ttlen

ecks

Prev

ent d

isto

rtion

s cre

ated

by

mid

dlem

en

Infr

astru

ctur

e Po

st-h

arve

st c

olle

ctio

n

Stor

age

Gro

wth

/trad

e/co

llect

ion

cent

res

for a

gri-p

rodu

cts

Tran

spor

tatio

n an

d co

mm

unic

atio

n fa

cilit

ies

Stor

age

for a

ll ty

pes o

f pr

oduc

e Tr

ansp

ort l

inks

M

iddl

emen

and

sy

ndic

ates

C

hilli

ng

cent

ers

Tran

spor

t inf

rast

ruct

ure

and

man

agem

ent

Acc

ess t

o in

form

atio

n, se

rvic

es

and

mar

ket t

hrou

gh

ICTs

M

akin

g fo

od m

arke

t ef

ficie

nt

Mar

ketin

g fa

cilit

ies

9.1

Dev

elop

qua

lity,

relia

ble,

su

stai

nabl

e an

d re

silie

nt

infr

astru

ctur

e, in

clud

ing

regi

onal

an

d tra

nsbo

rder

infr

astru

ctur

e, to

su

ppor

t eco

nom

ic d

evel

opm

ent a

nd

hum

an w

ell-b

eing

, with

a fo

cus o

n af

ford

able

and

equ

itabl

e ac

cess

for

all

12.3

See

abo

ve

Coo

pera

tion

betw

een

priv

ate

sect

or a

nd

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ess t

o ex

port

mar

kets

fo

r agr

o-pr

oces

sing

Fo

cus o

n de

velo

ping

M

SMEs

in h

ard

to re

ach

area

s

Publ

ic p

rivat

e pa

rtner

ship

s for

st

orag

e C

oope

rativ

es

Prom

ote

expo

rts o

f pro

cess

ed

mea

t A

gro-

base

d in

dust

ries f

or fr

uits

Farm

ers’

so

ciet

ies

Prog

ress

with

PPP

in

trans

port

M

arke

ting

faci

litie

s de

velo

ped

in

partn

ersh

ip w

ith p

rivat

e se

ctor

8.2

See

abov

e

Pi

llar noitirt un dna t nei ciff E .II-sensitive post-noiti dda eul av dna noit a mr ofsnart t sevrah


n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

II.2.

3. S

cale

-up

info

rmat

ion

diss

emin

atio

n in

clud

ing

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of

ICT

faci

litie

s

III.I

Enha

nced

nu

tritio

n

know

ledg

e,

prom

otio

n of

go

od p

ract

ices

, an

d co

nsum

ptio

n of

safe

an

d nu

tritio

us

diet

s

III.1

.1. S

cale

up

nutri

tion

train

ing,

be

havi

our c

hang

e co

mm

unic

atio

ns

(BC

C) f

or

enha

nced

kn

owle

dge,

safe

st

orag

e,

hous

ehol

d pr

oces

sing

and

im

prov

ed

cons

umpt

ion

III.1

.2. P

reve

nt

and

cont

rol n

on-

com

mun

icab

le

dise

ases

(NC

Ds)

an

d en

sure

he

alth

y di

ets

thro

ugh

prom

otio

n of

di

etar

y gu

idel

ines

lin

ked

with

na

tiona

l NC

D

stra

tegi

es a

nd

rela

ted

nutri

tion

serv

ices

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

Dha

ka G

oB, D

Ps, C

SOs

Reg

iona

l / a

cade

mia

Fa

rmer

s Pr

omot

e fo

od

proc

essi

ng a

nd v

alue

ad

ditio

n

Stre

ngth

en m

arke

t lin

kage

s M

obile

app

licat

ions

to h

elp

farm

ers s

ell p

rodu

ce

Use

of I

CTs

Com

mun

icat

ion

for b

ette

r m

arke

ts li

nks

Impr

ovin

g Se

rvic

e de

liver

y sy

stem

th

roug

h IC

T

5.B

Enh

ance

the

use

of e

nabl

ing

tech

nolo

gy, i

n pa

rticu

lar i

nfor

mat

ion

and

com

mun

icat

ions

tech

nolo

gy, t

o pr

omot

e th

e em

pow

erm

ent o

f wom

en

8.2

See

abov

e 9.

C S

igni

fican

tly in

crea

se a

cces

s to

info

rmat

ion

and

com

mun

icat

ions

te

chno

logy

and

striv

e to

pro

vide

un

iver

sal a

nd a

ffor

dabl

e ac

cess

to th

e In

tern

et in

leas

t dev

elop

ed c

ount

ries

by 2

020

Bui

ld a

war

enes

s D

evel

op n

utrit

ion

educ

atio

n pr

ogra

mm

es

Aw

aren

ess a

cros

s age

gro

ups

and

in G

over

nmen

t G

ende

r par

ity in

trai

ning

s In

clud

e nu

tritio

n in

scho

ol

curr

icul

a C

onsu

mer

beh

avio

ur c

hang

e co

mm

unic

atio

n w

ith sp

ecia

l em

phas

is o

n th

e el

derly

, w

omen

and

chi

ldre

n C

hang

e fo

od h

abits

U

se IC

Ts fo

r tra

inin

g pu

rpos

es

Nut

ritio

n m

ater

ials

R

ole

of th

e m

edia

C

ooki

ng d

emon

stra

tions

Pr

omot

ion

of li

vest

ock

espe

cial

ly in

hill

y ar

eas

Enco

urag

e m

ilk a

nd e

gg

cons

umpt

ion

Nut

ritio

n aw

aren

ess

Hea

lth a

nd n

utrit

ion

educ

atio

n A

ddre

ssin

g ch

ild a

nd

mat

erna

l mal

nutri

tion

Cap

acity

bui

ldin

g an

d aw

aren

ess o

n nu

tritio

n Pr

omot

ing

bala

nced

di

et c

onta

inin

g ad

equa

te

mic

ronu

trien

ts

Equa

l acc

ess t

o nu

tritio

n by

wom

en

3.4

By

2030

, red

uce

by o

ne th

ird

prem

atur

e m

orta

lity

from

non

- co

mm

unic

able

dis

ease

s thr

ough

pr

even

tion

and

treat

men

t and

pro

mot

e m

enta

l hea

lth a

nd w

ell-b

eing

12

.3 B

y 20

30, h

alve

per

cap

ita g

loba

l fo

od w

aste

at t

he re

tail

and

cons

umer

le

vels

and

redu

ce fo

od lo

sses

alo

ng

prod

uctio

n an

d su

pply

cha

ins,

in

clud

ing

post

-har

vest

loss

es

Prom

ote

heal

thy

food

s Id

entif

y nu

tritio

nal

need

s of o

lder

peo

ple

Reg

ulat

e ad

verti

sing

Trai

n ph

ysic

ians

and

in

fluen

tial p

eopl

e su

ch a

s im

ams t

o bu

ild n

utrit

ion

awar

enes

s D

ieta

ry g

uide

lines

for s

peci

fic

grou

ps su

ch a

s eld

erly

peo

ple

Sens

itise

con

sum

ers t

o av

oid

inta

ke o

f exc

ess s

alt a

nd su

gar

rich

food

s La

belli

ng

Com

mun

ity

clin

ics a

nd

med

icin

e av

aila

bilit

y

3.

4 Se

e ab

ove

Pi

llar

Inoit asilit u dna noit p musnoc , yti srevi d yrat ei d devor p mI .II


Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

Dha

ka G

oB, D

Ps, C

SOs

Reg

iona

l / a

cade

mia

Fa

rmer

s

Food

-bas

ed tr

eatm

ent

for d

isea

ses

Coo

king

dem

onst

ratio

ns

A

ddre

ssin

g ch

ild a

nd

mat

erna

l mal

nutri

tion

Sani

tatio

n pr

ogra

mm

es

Safe

wat

er e

spec

ially

afte

r di

sast

ers

Sani

tatio

n an

d hy

gien

e pr

ogra

mm

es

Safe

drin

king

w

ater

W

ASH

in S

choo

ls

Safe

drin

king

wat

er fo

r al

l, w

ater

qua

lity

mon

itorin

g an

d su

rvei

llanc

e

6.1

By

2030

, ach

ieve

uni

vers

al a

nd

equi

tabl

e ac

cess

to sa

fe a

nd a

ffor

dabl

e dr

inki

ng w

ater

for a

ll 6.

2 B

y 20

30, a

chie

ve a

cces

s to

adeq

uate

and

equ

itabl

e sa

nita

tion

and

hygi

ene

for a

ll an

d en

d op

en

defe

catio

n, p

ayin

g sp

ecia

l atte

ntio

n to

th

e ne

eds o

f wom

en a

nd g

irls a

nd th

ose

in v

ulne

rabl

e si

tuat

ions

Tr

ain

on th

e im

porta

nce

of h

ygie

ne

3.

3 B

y 20

30, e

nd th

e ep

idem

ics o

f A

IDS,

tube

rcul

osis

, mal

aria

and

ne

glec

ted

tropi

cal d

isea

ses a

nd c

omba

t he

patit

is, w

ater

-bor

ne d

isea

ses a

nd

othe

r com

mun

icab

le d

isea

ses

Pr

ovid

e m

edic

al a

ssis

tanc

e fo

r vu

lner

able

gro

ups

90

% sa

nita

ry la

trine

s in

rura

l are

as a

nd

100%

in u

rban

3.3

See

abov

e 6.

2. S

ee a

bove

Pi

llar noit asilit u dna noit p musnoc , yti srevi d yrat ei d devor p mI .III

n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

III.1

.3. K

now

ledg

e ba

sed

tool

s and

re

sear

ch o

n th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

pr

omot

ion

of

nutri

ent d

ense

re

cipe

s usi

ng lo

cal

food

s for

en

hanc

ing

dive

rsifi

ed fo

od

cons

umpt

ion

to

redu

ce st

untin

g,

was

ting

and

mic

ronu

trien

t de

ficie

ncie

s

III.2

Opt

imis

ed fo

od

utili

satio

n th

roug

h pr

ovis

ion

of sa

fe

wat

er, i

mpr

oved

fo

od h

ygie

ne a

nd

sani

tatio

n

III.2

.1. S

cale

up

the

supp

ly o

f saf

e w

ater

for

cons

umpt

ion

and

dom

estic

use

III.2

.2. E

nsur

e hy

gien

ic fo

od

hand

ling,

pr

epar

atio

n an

d se

rvic

es, a

nd sc

ale-

up h

and

was

hing

be

havi

our

III.2

.3. I

mpr

ove

sani

tary

faci

litie

s an

d pr

actic

es -

incl

udin

g th

e pr

even

tion

of

anim

al c

ross

- co

ntam

inat

ion-

for

redu

cing

dia

rrhe

al

and

food

bor

ne

illne

ss a

nd c

hild

un

dern

utrit

ion


Pi

llar IV. Enhanced ecneili ser desaercni dna st en yt efas dna noit cet or p l ai cos ot ssecca

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

n.

C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Sub-

pr

ogra

mm

es

Dha

ka G

oB, D

Ps, C

SOs

Reg

iona

l / a

cade

mia

Fa

rmer

s

Impo

rtanc

e of

ani

mal

so

urce

food

s C

over

age

of a

ll vu

lner

able

gr

oups

U

se o

f tec

hnol

ogy

for m

oney

tra

nsfe

rs

Shel

ter f

or a

nim

als

Empl

oym

ent o

ppor

tuni

ties f

or

the

ultra

-poo

r In

sura

nce

Food

ban

ks

Early

w

arni

ng

syst

ems

Insu

ranc

e

Agr

icul

tura

l dis

aste

r m

anag

emen

t Po

st-D

isas

ter

Rec

over

y,

Rec

onst

ruct

ion,

and

R

ehab

ilita

tion

1.5

By

2030

, bui

ld th

e re

silie

nce

of th

e po

or a

nd th

ose

in v

ulne

rabl

e si

tuat

ions

an

d re

duce

thei

r exp

osur

e an

d vu

lner

abili

ty to

clim

ate-

rela

ted

extre

me

even

ts a

nd o

ther

eco

nom

ic,

soci

al a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal s

hock

s and

di

sast

ers

IV. I

Tim

ely

and

effe

ctiv

e di

sast

er

prep

ared

ness

an

d re

spon

ses

thro

ugh

emer

genc

y fo

od

dist

ribut

ion,

st

eps

tow

ards

ag

ricul

tura

l se

ctor

re

habi

litat

ion

and

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

IV.1

.1. I

ncre

ase

the

resi

lienc

e of

ag

ricul

tura

l sy

stem

s, in

clud

ing

the

prod

uctio

n of

di

sast

er-r

esili

ent

nutri

tious

cro

ps

espe

cial

ly b

y vu

lner

able

po

pula

tions

Prep

ared

ness

N

utrit

ious

and

div

erse

food

s in

times

of d

isas

ter

A

ddre

ssin

g ch

ild a

nd

mat

erna

l mal

nutri

tion

Red

ucin

g R

isks

and

V

ulne

rabi

litie

s fro

m

Clim

ate

Cha

nge,

En

viro

nmen

tal

Deg

rada

tion

and

Dis

aste

r Pr

epar

edne

ss

Post

-Dis

aste

r R

ecov

ery,

R

econ

stru

ctio

n, a

nd

Reh

abili

tatio

n

13.1

Stre

ngth

en re

silie

nce

and

adap

tive

capa

city

to c

limat

e-re

late

d ha

zard

s and

na

tura

l dis

aste

rs in

all

coun

tries

2.

4 B

y 20

30, e

nsur

e su

stai

nabl

e fo

od

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

s and

impl

emen

t re

silie

nt a

gric

ultu

ral p

ract

ices

that

in

crea

se p

rodu

ctiv

ity a

nd p

rodu

ctio

n,

that

hel

p m

aint

ain

ecos

yste

ms,

that

st

reng

then

cap

acity

for a

dapt

atio

n to

cl

imat

e ch

ange

, ext

rem

e w

eath

er,

drou

ght,

flood

ing

and

othe

r dis

aste

rs

and

that

pro

gres

sive

ly im

prov

e la

nd

and

soil

qual

ity

IV.1

.2. E

nsur

e so

cial

and

ec

onom

ic a

cces

s to

food

for t

he

poor

est s

ectio

ns

of th

e po

pula

tion

in ti

mes

of c

risis

an

d in

are

as m

ost

affe

cted

by

disa

ster

Incl

ude

food

s oth

er th

an

food

grai

ns -p

roce

ssed

fo

ods,

anim

al so

urce

-

Effe

ctiv

e an

d ef

ficie

nt

soci

al se

curit

y ad

min

istra

tion

thro

ugh

ICT

Mai

ntai

ning

of b

uffe

r st

ock

IV.1

.3. S

cale

-up

mod

ern

food

st

orag

e fa

cilit

ies

for i

mpr

oved

Pu

blic

Foo

d D

istri

butio

n Sy

stem

pa

rticu

larly

in

dis

aste

r-pr

one

area

s


Pi

llar ecneili ser desaercni dna st en yt efas dna noit cet or p l ai cos ot ssecca decnahnE . VI

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

I D

haka

GoB

, DPs

, CSO

s R

egio

nal /

aca

dem

ia

Farm

ers

Life

cyc

le a

ppro

ach

Stre

ngth

en sc

hool

- fe

edin

g pr

ogra

mm

e M

ore

rese

arch

to c

heck

w

heth

er c

ash

is b

ette

r th

an fo

od in

all

circ

umst

ance

s A

dd a

dole

scen

t girl

s to

the

title

of s

ub-

prog

ram

me

IV.2

.1.

Prov

ide

food

and

cas

h as

sist

ance

C

over

age

of a

ll vu

lner

able

gr

oups

incl

udin

g th

e el

derly

D

atab

ase

Targ

etin

g an

d co

vera

ge

Effe

ctiv

e an

d ef

ficie

nt

soci

al se

curit

y ad

min

istra

tion

thro

ugh

ICT

Prog

ram

me

for

Con

solid

atio

n al

ong

the

Life

Cyc

le R

isks

St

reng

then

ing

Proc

esse

s for

Sel

ectin

g R

ecip

ient

s of S

ocia

l Se

curit

y Sc

hem

es

Effe

ctiv

e im

plem

enta

tion

of

targ

eted

food

pr

ogra

mm

es

Bui

ld a

n ex

tens

ive

netw

ork

of

man

agem

ent

info

rmat

ion

syst

em

(MIS

) bas

ed o

n IC

T to

im

plem

ent t

he

soci

al se

curit

y sy

stem

1.3

Impl

emen

t nat

iona

lly a

ppro

pria

te

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n sy

stem

s and

mea

sure

s fo

r all,

incl

udin

g flo

ors,

and

by 2

030

achi

eve

subs

tant

ial c

over

age

of th

e po

or a

nd th

e vu

lner

able

5.

4 R

ecog

nize

and

val

ue u

npai

d ca

re

and

dom

estic

wor

k th

roug

h th

e pr

ovis

ion

of p

ublic

serv

ices

, in

fras

truct

ure

and

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n po

licie

s and

the

prom

otio

n of

shar

ed

resp

onsi

bilit

y w

ithin

the

hous

ehol

d an

d th

e fa

mily

as n

atio

nally

app

ropr

iate

Impr

ove

reac

h an

d m

itiga

te d

isas

ters

Im

prov

e ta

rget

ing

Fo

cus o

n th

e ur

ban

vuln

erab

le

Cov

erag

e of

all

vuln

erab

le

grou

ps

Dat

abas

e Ta

rget

ing

and

cove

rage

of p

oor

fishe

rmen

Targ

etin

g an

d co

vera

ge

Effe

ctiv

e an

d ef

ficie

nt

soci

al se

curit

y ad

min

istra

tion

thro

ugh

ICT

Stre

ngth

enin

g Pr

oces

ses f

or S

elec

ting

Rec

ipie

nts o

f Soc

ial

Secu

rity

Sche

mes

Ef

fect

ive

impl

emen

tatio

n of

ta

rget

ed fo

od

prog

ram

mes

1.3

See

abov

e 5.

4 Se

e ab

ove

n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

IV.2

Stre

ngth

ened

so

cial

pr

otec

tion

and

safe

ty n

et

prog

ram

mes

for

targ

eted

gr

oups

acr

oss

the

life

cycl

e in

clud

ing

disa

bled

and

di

spla

ced

popu

latio

n

IV.2

.1. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

sa

fety

net

pr

ogra

mm

es

acro

ss th

e lif

e cy

cle

supp

ortin

g vu

lner

able

gr

oups

such

as

poor

wom

en,

child

ren,

the

elde

rly, d

isab

led

peop

le

and

disp

lace

d po

pula

tions

IV.2

.2. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

pr

ogra

mm

es fo

r su

ppor

ting

peop

le li

ving

in

vuln

erab

le a

nd

disa

dvan

tage

d ar

eas (

char

land

, riv

er b

ank,

ha

ors,

hill

tract

s an

d ur

ban

area

s)


Pi

llar

ssorc dna t ne mnori vne gnil bane deneht gnert S . V-cutting ytir uces noitirt un dna doof gni vei hca r of se mmar gor p

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

Dha

ka G

oB, D

Ps, C

SOs

Reg

iona

l / a

cade

mia

Fa

rmer

s In

trodu

ce n

utrit

ion

educ

atio

n in

SSN

s N

utrit

ion-

sens

itive

pr

ogra

mm

es

Forti

fy a

nd d

iver

sify

fo

od d

istri

bute

d En

sure

BM

S A

ct 2

013

is re

spec

ted

Intro

duce

div

erse

food

s w

ith h

igh

nutri

tiona

l co

nten

t

Incl

ude

nutri

tious

food

s in

food

di

strib

uted

N

utrit

ion

train

ing

as p

art o

f SS

Ns

Dis

tribu

te fo

rtifie

d fo

od

Incl

ude

nutri

tious

fo

ods i

n fo

od

dist

ribut

ed

Prom

ote

and

prot

ect

good

die

tary

pra

ctic

es

amon

g ch

ildre

n in

pl

aces

whe

re th

ere

are

scho

ol fe

edin

g pr

ogra

mm

es

Upg

rade

food

la

bora

torie

s A

ccre

dita

tion

Labe

lling

to sh

ow

accr

edita

tion

and

conf

orm

ity to

BFS

A

rule

s on

alle

rgen

s

Labo

rato

ries

Loca

l foo

d sa

fety

mon

itorin

g Im

plem

ent F

ood

Safe

ty A

ct

2013

Food

ad

ulte

ratio

n En

surin

g fo

od sa

fety

th

roug

h th

e fo

od

chai

n En

hanc

e G

oB

labo

rato

ry c

apac

ity b

y pr

ocur

ing

equi

pmen

t an

d tra

inin

g m

anpo

wer

Es

tabl

ish

accr

edita

tion

syst

em

6.3

By

2030

, im

prov

e w

ater

qua

lity

by

redu

cing

pol

lutio

n, e

limin

atin

g du

mpi

ng a

nd m

inim

izin

g re

leas

e of

ha

zard

ous c

hem

ical

s and

mat

eria

ls,

halv

ing

the

prop

ortio

n of

unt

reat

ed

was

tew

ater

and

subs

tant

ially

in

crea

sing

recy

clin

g an

d sa

fe re

use

glob

ally

12

.3 B

y 20

30, h

alve

per

cap

ita g

loba

l fo

od w

aste

at t

he re

tail

and

cons

umer

le

vels

and

redu

ce fo

od lo

sses

alo

ng

prod

uctio

n an

d su

pply

cha

ins,

incl

udin

g po

st-h

arve

st lo

sses

Bio

secu

rity

mea

sure

s Tr

aini

ng fo

r far

mer

s C

lust

ers a

nd z

ones

for

GA

P an

d G

HP

Was

te m

anag

emen

t Pr

otoc

ols

Dis

trict

leve

l lab

orat

ory

faci

litie

s for

test

ing

anim

al fe

ed

and

feed

ana

lyst

s Fo

od h

ygie

ne p

ract

ices

in

lives

tock

rear

ing

GA

P, G

MP,

GH

P D

evel

op a

nim

al a

nd p

oultr

y bi

o-

secu

rity

faci

litie

s

Una

dulte

rate

d fe

ed

Bio

secu

rity

train

ing

for

farm

ers

Intro

duct

ion

and

Popu

lariz

atio

n of

G

AP

Dis

sem

inat

ing

and

Impl

emen

ting

GA

P Sa

fe a

nd q

ualit

y fo

od

supp

ly

Ensu

ring

food

safe

ty

thro

ugh

the

food

ch

ain

6.3

See

abov

e 12

.3 S

ee a

bove

n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

IV.2

.3. I

ntro

duce

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

soci

al sa

fety

net

pr

ogra

mm

es

(SSN

P) in

clud

ing

food

forti

ficat

ion

espe

cial

ly fo

r m

othe

rs a

nd

child

ren

V. l

Impr

oved

food

sa

fety

, qua

lity

cont

rol a

nd

assu

ranc

e,

awar

enes

s on

food

safe

ty a

nd

hygi

ene

V.1

.1. E

nsur

e co

nfor

mity

of

food

s for

co

nsum

ptio

n th

roug

h ac

cred

itatio

n fr

om

certi

ficat

ion

agen

cies

, in

spec

tion

and

labo

rato

ry

serv

ices

V.1

.2. I

ntro

duce

an

d po

pula

rise

Goo

d A

gric

ultu

ral

Prac

tices

, Goo

d A

quac

ultu

ral

Prac

tices

and

G

ood

Hus

band

ry

Prac

tices

that

en

sure

food

safe

ty

and

qual

ity


Pi

llar

mnori vne gnil bane deneht gnert S . Vent and cross- gni vei hca r of se mmar gor p gnitt uc ytir uces noitirt un dna doof

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

I D

haka

GoB

, DPs

, CSO

s R

egio

nal /

aca

dem

ia

Farm

ers

Food

safe

ty is

sues

for

diff

eren

t pro

duce

G

ood

prac

tices

in

irrig

atio

n w

ater

, pon

d w

ater

use

, pes

ticid

e us

e

Food

safe

ty a

nd b

iose

curit

y in

po

ultry

, fis

h an

d cr

op p

rodu

ctio

n La

w e

nfor

cem

ent

Prot

ocol

s Fo

od h

ygie

ne p

ract

ices

in

lives

tock

rear

ing

and

food

pr

oces

sing

G

ood

Aqu

acul

ture

Pra

ctic

es a

s w

ell a

s GH

P, G

MP

and

HA

CC

P

Sa

fe a

nd q

ualit

y fo

od

supp

ly

Ensu

ring

food

safe

ty

thro

ugh

the

food

cha

in

12.3

See

abo

ve

Hyg

iene

and

food

safe

ty

awar

enes

s rai

sing

C

reat

e de

man

d fo

r foo

d sa

fety

and

hyg

iene

- lia

ise

with

CA

B

Cap

acity

for i

nspe

ctio

n an

d ce

rtific

atio

n C

oord

inat

e w

ork

of

diff

eren

t age

ncie

s Le

gal f

ram

ewor

ks

Aw

aren

ess

Sens

itisa

tion

Cha

nge

prac

tices

e.g

. sla

ught

er

hous

es

Rol

e of

ext

ensi

on se

rvic

es a

nd

farm

er fi

eld

scho

ols

St

reng

then

co

mm

unic

atio

ns fo

r aw

aren

ess a

nd

beha

viou

ral c

hang

e on

fo

od sa

fety

12.3

See

abo

ve

M

ore

rese

arch

by

NA

RS

En

sure

food

safe

ty

thro

ugh

the

food

cha

in

12.3

See

abo

ve

C

old

stor

age

at lo

cal l

evel

Pr

omot

e fo

od p

roce

ssin

g in

dust

ries

Impr

oved

stor

age

Stor

age

for

diff

eren

t typ

es

of fo

od

Ensu

re fo

od sa

fety

th

roug

h th

e fo

od c

hain

12

.3 S

ee a

bove

n.

C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Sub-

pr

ogra

mm

es

V.1

.3. I

ntro

duce

an

d sc

ale-

up g

ood

man

ufac

turin

g pr

actic

es (G

MP)

an

d go

od h

ygie

nic

prac

tices

(GH

P)

incl

udin

g ad

here

nce

to

Haz

ard

Ana

lysi

s an

d C

ritic

al

Con

trol P

oint

s (H

AC

CP)

co

mpl

ianc

e

V.1

.4. E

nhan

ce

food

safe

ty

educ

atio

n,

cons

umer

aw

aren

ess a

nd

food

sa

fety

net

wor

ks

V.2

R

educ

ed fo

od

loss

es a

nd w

aste

V.2

.1. I

mpr

ove

met

hods

of

mea

surin

g fo

od

loss

es a

nd

impl

emen

t ap

prop

riate

m

easu

res t

o m

inim

ise

food

lo

sses

at f

arm

le

vel

V.2

.2. S

treng

then

ca

paci

ty in

pos

t- ha

rves

t han

dlin

g te

chno

logy

and

in

fras

truct

ure

(tran

spor

t, pa

ckag

ing,

st

orag

e)


n.

CIP

2 In

vest

men

t Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b-

prog

ram

mes

V.2

.3. R

educ

e w

asta

ge a

nd

qual

ity/q

uant

ity

loss

of f

ood

prod

ucts

at a

ll st

ages

of m

arke

ting

and

cons

umpt

ion

V.3

Impr

oved

in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta fo

r ev

iden

ce-b

ased

m

onito

ring

and

adju

stm

ent o

f po

licie

s and

pr

ogra

mm

es

V.3

.1. P

rodu

ce

mor

e re

liabl

e an

d tim

ely

FNS

info

rmat

ion

and

data

thro

ugh

impr

oved

in

form

atio

n in

fras

truct

ures

, en

hanc

ed

coor

dina

tion

in

data

col

lect

ion

and

data

exc

hang

e to

im

prov

e ev

iden

ce-

base

d de

cisi

on

mak

ing,

pol

icy

form

ulat

ion

and

prog

ram

min

g

Pi

llar

ssorc dna t ne mnori vne gnil bane deneht gnert S . V-cutting ytir uces noitirt un dna doof gni vei hca r of se mmar gor p

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7F

YP

prio

ritie

s T

o w

hich

SD

G ta

rget

s it

cont

ribu

tes

Dha

ka G

oB, D

Ps, C

SOs

Reg

iona

l / a

cade

mia

Fa

rmer

s

Han

dle

prob

lem

of f

ood

loss

es a

nd w

asta

ge

Trac

eabi

lity

Rec

yclin

g D

emon

stra

tions

on

how

to

min

imis

e w

aste

Q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

at th

e be

ginn

ing

of th

e va

lue

chai

n to

pr

even

t was

te

Trac

eabi

lity

of fo

ods t

o en

sure

qu

ality

Infr

astru

ctur

e En

sure

food

safe

ty

thro

ugh

the

food

ch

ain

12.3

See

abo

ve

Car

ry o

ut n

utrit

ion

surv

eys

Add

ition

al d

ata

to

cons

ider

N

atio

nal S

trate

gy fo

r D

evel

opm

ent o

f St

atis

tics

Dat

abas

e on

m

icro

nutri

ent s

uppl

y

Reg

iona

l lev

el st

udie

s Lo

cal f

ood

cons

umpt

ion

surv

eys

Tota

l Die

ts S

tudy

17.1

8 B

y 20

20, e

nhan

ce c

apac

ity-

build

ing

supp

ort t

o de

velo

ping

co

untri

es, i

nclu

ding

for l

east

de

velo

ped

coun

tries

and

smal

l isl

and

deve

lopi

ng S

tate

s, to

incr

ease

si

gnifi

cant

ly th

e av

aila

bilit

y of

hig

h-

qual

ity, t

imel

y an

d re

liabl

e da

ta

disa

ggre

gate

d by

inco

me,

gen

der,

age,

ra

ce, e

thni

city

, mig

rato

ry st

atus

, di

sabi

lity,

geo

grap

hic

loca

tion

and

othe

r cha

ract

eris

tics r

elev

ant i

n na

tiona

l con

text

s


n.

C

IP2

Inve

stm

ent

Prog

ram

me

Sub-

pr

ogra

mm

es

V.4

Stre

ngth

ened

FN

S go

vern

ance

, ca

paci

ty

stre

ngth

enin

g an

d le

ader

ship

ac

ross

FN

S re

leva

nt

stak

ehol

ders

V.4

.1.

Stre

ngth

en

exis

ting

natio

nal

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sms

liais

ing

with

ex

istin

g FN

S fr

amew

orks

, cl

uste

rs a

nd

netw

orks

in

clud

ing

the

SUN

in

itiat

ive

and

netw

orks

wor

king

to

war

ds

inte

grat

ing

the

Rig

ht to

Foo

d to

th

e C

onst

itutio

n

V.4

.2. S

treng

then

ca

paci

ties t

o de

sign

and

m

onito

r the

new

Fo

od a

nd

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y Po

licy

and

impl

emen

t, m

onito

r and

co

ordi

nate

the

CIP

2

Pi

llar

ssorc dna t ne mnori vne gnil bane deneht gnert S . V- r of se mmar gor p gnitt ucytir uces noitirt un dna doof gni vei hca

Rec

omm

enda

tions

from

con

sulta

tions

7FY

P pr

iori

ties

To

whi

ch S

DG

targ

ets i

t co

ntri

bute

s D

haka

GoB

, DPs

, CSO

s R

egio

nal /

aca

dem

ia

Farm

ers

Prom

ote

coor

dina

tion

betw

een

stak

ehol

ders

Pr

omot

e us

e of

CIP

2 to

ch

anne

l fun

ds

Prom

ote

priv

ate

sect

or

parti

cipa

tion

in C

IP b

y tra

nsla

ting

it in

to

Ben

gali

Con

tinuo

us d

ialo

gue

with

FB

CC

I C

olla

bora

tion

betw

een

Cha

mbe

rs o

f Com

mer

ce

and

the

priv

ate

sect

or

BN

NC

to b

e m

entio

ned

BFS

LN to

be

linke

d w

ith re

leva

nt a

utho

ritie

s e.

g. B

STI

LCG

for s

ocia

l pr

otec

tion

to

com

mun

icat

e w

ith

Cen

tral M

anag

emen

t C

omm

ittee

on

SSN

s

Nat

iona

l lev

el c

oord

inat

ion

syst

em

Sp

ecify

role

s and

re

spon

sibi

litie

s of t

he

stak

ehol

ders

for

nutri

tion

Arr

ange

men

ts a

nd

appr

opria

te

coor

dina

tion

and

syne

rgis

tic a

ctio

ns

17.1

3 En

hanc

e gl

obal

mac

roec

onom

ic

stab

ility

, inc

ludi

ng th

roug

h po

licy

coor

dina

tion

and

polic

y co

here

nce

17.1

4 En

hanc

e po

licy

cohe

renc

e fo

r su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t

Cla

rify

regi

onal

in

volv

emen

t H

arm

onis

e w

ith o

ther

po

licie

s and

act

ion

plan

s

Mon

itor N

FP-P

OA

an

d C

IP, p

repa

re a

nd

final

ise

new

NFN

SP

17. l

3 E

nhan

ce g

loba

l mac

roec

onom

ic

stab

ility

, inc

ludi

ng th

roug

h po

licy

coor

dina

tion

and

polic

y co

here

nce

17.1

4 En

hanc

e po

licy

cohe

renc

e fo

r su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t



OUTCOME I: DIVERSIFIED AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND LIVESTOCK FOR HEALTHY DIETS

Annex 4. Detailed description of each investment programme and sub-programme

Programme I.1. Sustainable intensification and diversification of crop-based production systems

Programme aggregate output: The use of agricultural land to provide affordable and healthy diets to all is optimised by enhancing overall productivity and growing high value and nutritious crops in a sustainable way that is resilient to climate change.


Develop varieties • High yielding and high nutritional value varieties • Citrus, spices, oilseed, pulses and tuber crops • Short maturing Aus/Aman rice, summer season hybrid vegetables, lean and year-round season fruits • Rice varieties rich in vitamin, zinc and iron and other biofortified crops • Low-input/high output varieties -hybrid, green super rice-

Improve technology • Gender-sensitive technology, labour-saving technologies • Low cost sustainable mechanisation that eases difficult tasks, relieves labour shortages, improves

productivity and timeliness of agricultural operations, improves the efficient use of resources to mitigate negative impact on natural resources

• Technology for organic farming especially of horticultural crops and exports • Research to minimise the yield gap

Strengthen research capacities and infrastructure of institutions, and promote partnerships • NARS, Genetic Engineering Research of Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), BINA,

Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute, BARC, Biotechnological research in BARI • Public private partnership on biotechnology and tissue culture facilities

Develop management practices • Cropping pattern for high Barind with short maturing HYV Aus varieties • Introduction of leguminous crops into the cropping pattern • Adaptive trials for direct seeded rice cultivars and all technology developed by NARS • Low-cost technology for hill, char, haor land and coastal areas • Collection, conservation and preservation of germplasms • Affordable sustainable farm mechanisation • Support contract farming with public private partnerships

Adapt crop choices and practices • Adapt methods to unfavourable ecosystems e.g. produce low water survivor crops in drought-

prone areas • Adopt and expand of climate smart agricultural methods

I.1.1. Enhance agricultural research and knowledge, and technology development for more productive, diverse, sustainable and nutrition-sensitive agriculture

I.1.2. Develop technologies, including biotechnologies, and measures to adapt agricultural systems to climate change


• New high-impact technologies e.g. biotechnology, biofortification, and nanotechnology • Develop PPPs • Expand of solar power • Introduce/develop crops most adapted to new conditions in terms of their nutritional content but

also their income generating value e.g. commercial seaweed cultivation in coastlines • Trials in the vulnerable climatic regions based on NAPA and BCCSAP priorities

Research and infrastructure • Establish an Environment Stress Research Centre for sustainable crop production in the problem

areas of the country • Strengthen regional research infrastructure and activities to deal with climate change with a focus

on climatically and economically vulnerable areas such as coastal zones, char areas, the North • Stress-tolerant crop production technology generation and development e.g. flexible HYVs • Research on new pests and diseases linked to climate change • Create database on agricultural resources to determine climate change impact

Develop capacities • Revitalise and operationalise District Technical Committees (DTC), Regional Technical

Committees (RTC), Agricultural Technical Committees (ATC) and National Agricultural Technical Coordination Committees (NATCC)

• Develop the capacities of extension departments (DAE) and farmers’ organisations • Promote e-agro-technology transfer system and support creation of nationwide digitised

agricultural database system • Strengthen MIS (ICT) based knowledge management system and e-agriculture • Expand AICC at village level and FIAC at union level

Ensure technology transfer and adoption of new technologies and practices (especially to and by women), and community-based learning • Disseminate of GIS-based agrological information • Farmer’s training at upazila level for transfer of technology • Disseminate knowledge on climate resilient sustainable technology • Incorporate nutrition objectives in integrated agriculture development and extension services • Recruit more female agricultural workers • Target extension services to women and small and marginal farmers • Promote fruits and vegetables gardening • Promote labour-saving technologies/practices especially for women such as no-tillage methods • Improve extension services, through qualitative demonstration, field and agricultural days • Carry out demonstrations • Develop ICT-based surveillance system to detect, diagnose, prevent and control diseases • Support community-based efforts of homestead gardening

Output indicators

• 7FYP: % of agriculture budget allocated in the agricultural research

• PoA- CIP1: Annual change in major crops’ production

• Direct gender budgeting as % of Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) budget (revised)

• PoA- CIP1: Number of improved new varieties released

• Production of seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence in MT

• PoA- CIP1: Number of farmers trained on sustainable agriculture practices by DAE

• Number of institutions delivering nutrition training across core ministries

I.1.3. Improve and expand nutrition-sensitive extension programmes and agricultural advisory services


Relevant government policies, strategies and plans

• SDGs • Vision 2021 and its associated Perspective

Plan of Bangladesh 2010-2021 • National Sustainable Development

Strategy 2010-2021 • NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020 • National Agriculture Policy 2018 • (draft) National Agricultural Extension

Policy 2015 • Research priorities in Bangladesh

Agriculture, BARC 2011 • National Integrated Pest Management Policy 2002

• Master Plan for Agricultural Development in the Southern Region of Bangladesh 2013

• Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan 2009

• 2005 NAPA • BDP 2100 • National Women Development Policy

2011 and its Plan of Action


The Ministry of Agriculture plans to invest in strengthening environmental stress research for sustainable crop production in the problem areas of Bangladesh through BARI. A major DAE project is also in the pipeline to strengthen diversified crop production by climate smart agriculture system. Its main ongoing projects are the RDCD’s ‘Expansion, Renovation and Modernization of Bangladesh Poverty Alleviation Training Complex’ in Gopalgonj and DAE’s ‘Year-Round Fruit Production for Nutrition Improvement Project’.

Cost and financing requirements (in US$ million)

Sub-programmes Total CIP2

Total existing

Total gap

Nutrition weighted gap

I.1.1. Enhance agricultural research and knowledge, and technology development for more productive, diverse, 246.7 74.2 172.4 129.3 sustainable and nutrition-sensitive agriculture I.1.2. Develop technologies including biotechnologies and 162.9 21.6 141.3 106.0 measures to adapt agricultural systems to climate change I.1.3. Improve and expand nutrition-sensitive extension 212.5 88.2 124.3 93.2 programmes and agricultural advisory services Grand Total 622.1 184.0 438.1 328.6

Implementation features

Main implementing institutions NARS institutes, DAE, DLS, DoF, Department of Environment (DoE), BADC, BINA and Barind Multipurpose Development Authority (BMDA) Universities, Helen Keller International (HKI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) centres e.g. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), CIMMYT, WorldFish and Harvest plus, private sector, NGOs

International DPs involved USAID, Department for International Development (DflD), World Bank (WB), International Development Association (IDA), International Finance Corporation (IFC), Islamic Development Bank (IDB), Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (EKN), FAO, LCG sub groups, including AFSRD

Additional considerations

• Coordination is required to ensure women do not fall through the extension net. • Capacities, both human and physical, of public agencies will need to be strengthened in order t o

properly implement these interventions. • Grass-root knowledge and experience must be used to single out best practices.


Programme aggregate output: Farmers are able to access quality agricultural inputs more cheaply and readily and are able to manage their use more sustainably and efficiently.


Develop capacities• Expand both seed multiplication and processing farms and preservation facilities of BADC,

NARS, DAE and contract growers • Capacity of public laboratories and Seed Certification Agency (SCA) for testing quality of inputs • Research on biocontrol of pest for non-polluting pest management

Work with farmers• Farmers’ capacity for autonomous production of quality seeds • Strengthen farmers’ knowledge on seeds and balanced use of fertilisers • Involve women farmer groups in the distribution of seeds and fertili sers to ensure access to inputs

by women

Adopt Precision Agriculture (PA) whenever possible in order to optimise input use and maximise returns while preserving resources and reducing environmental risks • Use of Urea Super Granules (USG) • Buried pipe, drip and sprinkler irrigation • Integrated Pest Management notably through biocontrol

Promote partnerships • Participation of NGOs -especially with regards to reaching women- and private sector in seed

distribution

Promote improved practices • More efficient and balanced use of fertiliser with application of fertilisers on the basis of soil tests • Micronutrient fortified fertiliser use • Environmentally sound fertility management practice with for example the use of vermin compost

for sustainable soil fertility management and other bio-fertilisers and mineral fertilisers which do not affect the quality of water

• Use of specific vegetation and trees to protect soils, introduction of crop rotation with legumes

Strengthen capacities and knowledge • Provide soil testing kits locally • Improve soil testing laboratories • Detailed soil survey-based inventory of land and soil resources at union level for precision

planning

Create the right conditions • Carry out land zoning for sustainable land -and water- use • Enhance river dredging initiatives to reduce riverbank erosion • Establish land rights for the most vulnerable groups, especially women

I.2.1. Enhance availability and efficient use of affordable and quality inputs (seeds, fertilisers, pesticides) and credit for safe and diversified crops

I.2.2. Preserve agricultural land fertility and establish land rights of most vulnerable populations

Programme 1.2.: Improved access, quality and management of agricultural inputs,including water and land


Improve capacities and knowledge • Strengthen capacities for research through training and appropriate infrastructure • Develop techniques to mitigate the effects of arsenic • Develop water saving technologies • Upgrade and update the National Water Resources Database (NWRD)

Develop new and maintain existing infrastructures encouraging private sector involvement as appropriate • Promote surface water irrigation through expansion of irrigation infrastructure • Create water reservoirs and harvest rain water • Excavate/re-excavate the natural canals and other water bodies

Adapt and promote the adoption of new practices • Arsenic mitigation technology • AWD technology as a water saving option in irrigation • Cost-effective water distribution system • Fish farming in water bodies used for irrigation

Improve management • Manage surface water in the South and flood plains, haors, hills and char lands • Reduce dependence on irrigation-dependant Boro rice through irrigation supply for rain-fed T.

Aman and Aus rice • Prepare areas for timely Boro rice planting in the South through effective draining • Stimulate community participation to ensure maintenance of small-scale water resources

infrastructure

Research • Strengthen the human capacity and infrastructure required to carry out research on saline intrusion • Assess the biodiversity change and identify solutions in the context of climate change and salinity

intrusion • Develop saline-resistant rice varieties

Adapt practices • Promote the planting of saline-tolerant fruit trees • Zone specific integrated farming with an emphasis on rice and fish farming • Improve brackish water management practices • Rehabilitate polders and their management

Output indicators

• PoA- CIP1: Annual change in improved rice, wheat and maize seeds production

• PoA- CIPI: Improved seeds supply (BADC, DAE and private companies) as % of agronomic requirements

• Number of soil samples analysed to upazila and union levels

• Arable land increased by expansion of minor irrigation coverage by encouraging

optimal use of surface water, and increasing the area of arable land by reducing waterlogging and submergence in thousand ha

• Direct gender budgeting as % of Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR) budget (revised)

• PoA- CIPI: Supply of urea as % of estimated requirements


I.2.4. Mitigate the effects of saline water intrusion and its impact on food production and implications for consumption


• PoA- CIP1: Supply of Murate of Potash (MOP) as % of estimated requirements

• PoA- CIP1: Supply of Triple Super Phosphate (TSP) as % of estimated requirements

• PoA- CIP1: Agricultural credit disbursement in billion taka

• Number of samples of fish feed tested for quality assurance

• Area of land affected by salinisation • Area of land under organic farming

• SDG indicator 5.a.1 (a) Proportion of total agricultural population with ownership or secure rights over agricultural land, by sex; and (b) share of women among owners or rights-bearers of agricultural land, by type of tenure

• SDG indicator 6.4.1 Change in water-use efficiency over time

• SDG indicator 6.4.2 Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources




Strategy (2010-2021) • NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020 • National Agriculture Policy 2018 • APA MoA 2016-17 • National Seed Policy 1993 • Pesticides Act 2018

Seeds Act 2018

••

Research priorities in Bangladesh Agriculture, BARC 2011

• National Land Use Policy 2001

• Master Plan for Agricultural Development in the Southern Region of Bangladesh 2013

• Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan 2009

• 2005 NAPA • Bangladesh Water Act 2013 • National Water Policy 1999 • National Water Management Plan 2004 • (Draft) National Agricultural Extension

Policy 2015 • BDP 2100 • National Women Development Policy 2011

and its Plan of Action


The pipeline budget of this programme is inflated by the planned setting up of a modern, energy efficient with higher capacity urea fertiliser factory to cost over US$ 1 billion with one quarter of the funds to come from DPs. Most substantial ongoing projects are related to irrigation and water management.


• National Integrated Pest Management Policy 2002


Total existing

Total gap


I.2.1. Enhance availability and efficient use of affordable and quality inputs (seeds, fertilisers, pesticides) and credit for safe and diversified crops 1279.6

214.0

1065.6

799.2

I.2.2. Preserve agricultural land fertility and establish land rights of most vulnerable populations 39.8 39.8 0.0 0.0


1017.2

831.9

185.3

129.4

I.2.4. Mitigate the effects of saline water intrusion and its impact on food production and implications for consumption 64.5 64.5 0 0

Grand Total 2401.1 1150.2 1250.8 928.5



Main implementing institutions NARS institutes, MoA, DAE, BADC, BCIC, SCA, BSTI, BMDA, National Water Resources Council (NWRC), LGED, Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) Universities, CSOs, CGIAR centers e.g. IRRI, CIMMYT, World Fish and Harvest plus, private sector, farmers’ organisations

International DPs involved IDA, Asian Development Bank (ADB), International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD), IDB, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), USAID, Danish International Development Agency (Danida), Australian Agency for International Development (AusAid), EU, Korea, Switzerland, EKN, LCG sub groups, including the LCG on AFSRD, the LCG on Water, the LCG on Climate Change and Environment


• Close collaboration between several ministries but particularly the Ministries of Agriculture, Industry and Water Resources, farmer organisations and the private sector is critical.

• A supportive policy environment that enables PPPs and enhances participation of the private sector is key.

• A number of problems due to geographical idiosyncrasies make implementation of agricultural programmes all the more challenging.

• Input adulteration is a continuous threat.


Programme I.3.: Enhanced productivity and sustainable production of animal source foods

Programme aggregate output: The production of foods from animal source is increased by boosting the productivity and profitability of the fisheries, aquaculture and livestock sectors in a susta inable manner.


I.3.1.1. Fisheries and aquaculture

Promote research/develop capacities • Develop climatic smart technologies for fisheries and aquaculture • Develop capacities of DoF for the enhancement of fishery extension services • Capacity of BFRI and universities to boost technology development

Review and ensure implementation of rules and practices • Establish fish and wetland sanctuaries with fishing bans in some areas and some seasons, gear

restrictions and species restrictions • Establish fisher’s rights over water bodies especially for the most vulnerable

Promote management practices and improve extension services to farmers • Participatory management of water resources by community-based organisations • Promote climate adaptive technologies to reduce vulnerability • Provide technology and knowledge to farmers on how to produce feed with high content in protein

and vitamins cheaply

I.3.1.2. Livestock and poultry

Promote research/develop capacities • Establish a dairy research institute

Promote practices through BCC, training and ICT extension services • Establish good husbandry practices • Introduce animal identification and recording systems • Train farmers and demonstrate new practices • Provide door step and ICT based extension service delivery • Spread mechanised and climate resilient environment friendly production practices • Promote smallholder dairy farming integrated with crop and fish culture • Training to strengthen technical capacities and BCC to farmers to sensitise to benefits of poultry

raising -backyard poultry especially indigenous chicken- • Promote small-scale biogas plants for farms with livestock and poultry • Training of methods to enhance production of meat and poultry with special emphasis on beef

fattening, small ruminants and broiler production • Intensify technology-based commercial production of layers (eggs)

Enforce Acts and Rules with new policy interventions • Enforcement of existing laws and rules regarding diseases control, slaughtering and quality control

of feeds • Formulate a dairy development policy • Establish of dairy development board

I.3.1. Improve management of fisheries, livestock and poultry to increase production and productivity and nutritional value while ensuring sustainability


I.3.2.1. Fisheries and aquaculture

Introduce and scale up new practices • Promote polyculture of SIS • Connect ponds to rice fields • Use seasonal bodies for fish farming • Distribute pure brood stock to GoB hatcheries and selected private and NGO hatcheries to produce

good quality fish seed and fries of commercially important and endangered species

Enhance capacities/promote research • Develop capacities of Fish Seed Multiplication Farms of the DoF, research stations of the BFRI

and other GoB establishments to maintain purity of indigenous species brood stock through appropriate breeding

• Develop physical and human capacities of institutions that contribute to the preservation, improvement and diversity of fish species

• Develop capacities to develop new technologies

I.3.2.2. Livestock and poultry

Enhance capacities/promote research • Strengthen research capacity toward genetic improvement of existing species • Provide adequate postgraduate training • Ensure local germplasm conservation • Strengthen breed development • Improve gene pool by developing breeds through precise artificial insemination services

Enhance capacities • Enhance laboratory testing capacities by procuring equipment and trained human resources • Promote shrimp cluster farming through GAP with provision of technology, inputs, financing,

facilitation of linkages to markets • Facilitate introduction of SPF shrimp by private sector • Explore the opportunities of Blue Economy Initiatives (BEI) through managing the marine and

coastal fisheries resources in a sustainable manner

Disseminate new practices • Introduce semi-intensive shrimp culture by providing training to farmers, adequate technology and

credit • Protect marine and coastal resources from illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing • Ensure access to marine and coastal resources by vulnerable fisher communities • Promote brackish water fish and shell fish culture in areas affected by water salinity • Promote zone specific aquaculture farming systems

Strengthen animal health services • Strengthen veterinary and artificial insemination services of DLS for better diagnoses and access to

drugs • Develop technical process of breeding • Strengthen veterinary diseases diagnostic lab facilities along with surveillance and monitoring • Establish veterinary disease diagnostic and feed analysis



I.3.4. Improve fisheries, livestock and poultry health services, quality inputs and surveillance


• Enhance capacities to provide health services and to undertake research • Target research to emerging problems such as drug resistance

Promote partnerships • Availability and quality of inputs -quality feed, day old chicks, breeds and medicine/vaccination-

through public private partnerships • Community-based fodder cultivation along roads and highways, rivers and embankments, in Khas

lands and in combinations with crops • Cooperatives e.g. milk to promote production of animal source foods as source of income as well

as nutrition

Ensure quality • Accelerate quality feeds, fodder, medicines, semen, and vaccines production • Ensure efficient supply of inputs like day old chicks, vaccines, semen and other related materials • Strictly implement Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and build awareness • Coordinate stakeholders and one health approaches • Introduce individual animal identification and recording system • Introduce new layer strains and development of Parent and Grand Parent

Enforce acts and rules with new policy interventions • Enforce existing laws and rules regarding diseases control, slaughtering and quality control of

feeds • Develop and implement hatchery act

Output indicators

• 7FYP: Percentage of (a) coastal and (b) marine areas that are protected

• 7FYP: Percentage of wetland and natural sanctuaries maintained

• PoA- CIP1: Annual change in quantity of fish production

• PoA- CIP1: Fishery exports (value as % of total export; of which shrimp share in %)

• PoA- CIP1: GDP from fishery sector as % of agriculture GDP (excluding forest), at constant prices 2005/06

• PoA- CIP1: Production of eggs (million), milk (MT), cattle and meat (MT)

• PoA- CIP1: GDP from livestock sector as % of agriculture GDP (excluding forest), at constant prices 2005/06

• Growth rate of livestock GDP

• Number of doses of vaccines produced • PoA- CIP1: Annual change in

artificial insemination • Number of farmers trained by the DoF

and DLS • Direct gender budgeting as % of

MoFL budget (revised) • Number of commercial registered

• poultry • livestock • fish farms

• Number of ponds • SDG indicator 14.2.1 Proportion of

national exclusive economic zones managed using ecosystem-based approaches



Plan of Bangladesh 2010-2021 • National Sustainable Development Strategy

2010-2021 • NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020 • Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and

Action Plan 2009 • (draft) National Agricultural Extension

Policy 2015

• Bangladesh Water Act 2013 • Public Water body (Jalmahal)

Management Policy 2009 • National Aquaculture Development

Strategy and Action Plan of Bangladesh 2013-2020

• National Fisheries Policy 1998 and its associated Fisheries Sector Road Map 2006

• (draft) National Policy on Marine Fisheries 2016


• National Fisheries Strategies 2006 • Fish Hatchery Act 2010 • Fish Hatchery Rules 2011 • Fish Feed and Animal Feed Act 2010 • Fish Feed Rules 2011 • National Shrimp Policy 2014 • BDP 2100 • National Poultry Development Policy 2008

• National Livestock Development Policy 2007

• (draft) National Livestock Extension Policy 2012

• National Women Development Policy 2011 and its Plan of Action

• (draft) Marine Fisheries Act 2017


The two biggest ongoing projects are the Department of Fisheries’ ‘Water reformation for increasing fish production’ and the Department of Livestock’s ‘Establishment of Institute of Livestock science and technology’, both of which are categorised as nutrition-sensitive projects. The MoFL’s ‘Sustainable Coastal and marine fisheries in Bangladesh’ pipeline project is the most substantial in this programme followed by the portion of the LDDMPP allocated to this programme40.


Sub-programmes Total CIP2 Total

existing Total gap Nutrition

weighted gap I.3.1. Improve management of fisheries, livestock and poultry to increase production and productivity and nutritional value while ensuring sustainability

245.4

152.4

93.0

69.8


127.7

90.5

37.2

27.9


245.3

21.1

224.2

168.1

I.3.4. Improve fisheries, livestock and poultry health services, quality inputs and surveillance 173.7 34.7 139.0 104.3

Grand Total 792.1 298.6 493.4 370.1


Main implementing institutions DoF, Bangladesh Fisheries Development Corporation (BFDC), BFRI, DLS, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI) Universities, CGIAR centers e.g. World Fish and Harvest plus, private sector, CSOs

International DPs involved USAID, ADB, DANIDA, EKN and World Bank


• Collaboration between the Ministry of Agriculture and Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock is essential.

• An enabling policy environment and policy is needed to promote PPPs and enhance participation of private sector entrepreneurs.

• Access rights over land and water bodies are essential for the most vulnerable.

40 As explained in Section 11, some projects fall under several CIP2 programmes. In such cases, only the corresponding shares of their budgets are allocated to each programme.


Programme II.1. Strengthened post-harvest value chain with particular focus on MSMEs (storage, processing, branding, labelling, marketing and trade)

Programme aggregate output: Food value chains are developed contributing to better access to nutritious food and increased rural incomes through the creation of employment.


Promote R&D • Carry out research to better understand food value chains and their potential for income generation

and the production of more nutritious foods • Develop agro-processing techniques adapted to local produce, local conditions and with views to

export

Build capacities and spread good practices • Develop marketing skills, including product branding and labelling • Provide affordable credit and other means to enable the development of MSMEs, especially in

hard-to-reach areas • Provide training and guidance -with emphasis on youth and women- on entrepreneurship skills for

food manufacturing • Introduce food processing through employment and income generating programmes • Impart information on profitable food processing activities - also export opportunities, including at

producer level (Programme I.3.). For example, promote rearing of quality cows for the production of quality meat.

• Develop food producers’ marketing skills flagging certain aspects such as the importance of branding their products

• Promote labour-saving technologies/practices especially for women such as no-tillage methods

Work with private sector and NGOs to develop the food processing sector • Collaborate with local private sector and NGOs to identify skills needed to develop food

processing activities • Ensure maternity protection and enable women’s paid work through the provision of day care for

children

Disseminate knowledge and promote good practices on appropriate food processing technologies • Disseminate knowledge on food processing practices that enhance nutritional value of food e.g.

germination and malting of grains and pulses which enhances their vitamin, mineral and prot ein content and bioavailability or reduces it e.g. prolonged exposure to heat reduces vitamin content

• Promote practices, off-farm activities and agro-businesses that extend shelf-life ensuring year- round good nutrition and income such as freezing, fermentation, pickling, canning and pasteurisation

OUTCOME II: EFFICIENT, NUTRITION-SENSITIVE POST-HARVEST TRANSFORMATION, VALUE ADDITION

II.1.1. Develop skills and strengthen capacity to process and supply safe and nutrient-rich foods with emphasis on quality standards and nutrient labelling information

II.1.2. Adopt appropriate technology and strengthen infrastructure to allow quality improvement, value addition and fortification of foods


Strengthen post-harvest handling infrastructure • Improve and expand of modern storage -especially in disaster-prone areas- that are equipped to

adapt to the climate change impacts • Develop/disseminate appropriate/affordable household level storage methods • Develop cold chain infrastructure for different foods in close collaboration with the private sector • Build/expand processing plants for fish, fruits and vegetables • Introduce appropriate post-harvest technology, such as small pounding and de-husking machines,

which will mostly save women's burdens

Promote quality value addition • Help develop and recognise the quality of farm produce with certification of products • Collaborate with the food industry to adjust the food composition of processed foods to reduce or

eliminate the use of ingredients such as salt, trans fats, sugar and additives for better nutrition

Facilitate the formation of producer and marketing groups and cooperatives • Promote cooperatives for group marketing and developing supply chains for the farmers with

emphasis on women producers and smallholders • Promote milk production, processing and marketing through cooperatives • Support marine fisheries value chain development through cost sharing projects that can organi se

fish procurement centres and fish collection points

Assist producer/marketing groups in making food value chains more efficient • Improve linkages between food producers and markets, including retailers. Cooperatives can help

marginal producers benefit from fairer prices. • Link producer groups to domestic and international markets • Shorten food value chains by reducing the number of intermediaries between producers and

retailers

Output indicators

• Number of large establishments manufacturing food

• Number of medium, small and micro establishments manufacturing food

• PoA- CIP1: Difference between farm gate and retail price of selected goods

• Food and beverages exported in million Taka • Coverage of agro-business entrepreneurship

training by the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Industries (BSCIC), in thousands




Strategy 2010-2021 • NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020 • National Industrial Policy 2016 • National Agriculture Policy 2018 • National Poultry Development Policy

2008 • National Fisheries Policy 1998 and its

associated 2006 Fisheries Sector Road Map

• (draft) National Policy on Marine Fisheries 2016

• (draft) National Agricultural Extension Policy 2015

• National Livestock Development Policy 2007 • (draft) National Livestock Extension Policy

2012 • National Shrimp Policy 2014 • BDP 2100 • National Skill Development Policy 2011 • Bangladesh Accreditation Action 2006 • National Nutrition Policy 2015 • National Women Development Policy 2011


II.1.3. Mobilise and promote producer and marketing groups for improved market access and bargaining power, especially for women and smallholders



This programme counts much fewer interventions, all of which are categorised as nutrition-supportive rather than sensitive. The two main ongoing ones are DAE’s ‘Integrated Farm Management, Agricultural Production and Employment Programme’ and Milk Vita’s ‘Establishment of Super Instant Milk Plant at Baghabarighat, Sirajgonj’. In terms of pipeline, the project that stands out in terms of required funds is the Department of Fisheries’ ‘Sustainable Management and Value Chain Development in Fisheries Sector’.


Sub-programmes Total CIP2 Total

existing Total gap


II.1.1. Develop skills and strengthen capacity to process and supply safe and nutrient-rich foods with 48.2 7.6 40.6 20.3 emphasis on quality standards and nutrient labelling information II.1.2. Adopt appropriate technology and strengthen

infrastructure to allow quality improvement, value 286.6 13.7 273.0 136.5 addition and fortification of foods II.1.3. Mobilise and promote producer and marketing groups for improved market access and bargaining 102.3 32.1 70.2 35.1 power, especially for women and smallholders Grand Total 437.1 53.3 383.8 191.9


Main implementing institutions Ministry of Industries (Mol), Department of Agricultural Marketing (DAM), DAE, DLS, DoF, Agriculture Information Service (AIS), BFDC Private sector, including BCSA, Bangladesh Agro-Processors’ Association (BAPA), BRAC, CSOs

International DPs involved IFAD, ADB, WB, DANIDA, IDB, DFID, Deutsche Gesellschaft für International Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), EKN and Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KFW)


• Substantial efforts are needed in terms of coordination, especially among different ministries and line agencies involved and with the private sector.

• Influencing contents of food products produced by the private sector, especially big companies who already have an established demand will be challenging.

• Access to finance in rural areas is paramount for small entrepreneurs and small -scale producers.


Programme II.2. Improved access to markets, facilities and information

Programme aggregate output: Food producers and processors are able to use markets more efficiently.


• Build and maintain existing link road and feeder road for connecting local improved markets to allow prompt transportation of fresh produce and avoid spoilage

• Develop market infrastructures for fish landing sites as well as post-harvest service centres • Establish modern slaughter house and live poultry marketing facilities • Promote harbour-based fish dressing centres and fish processing estates • Ensure continuous electricity supply for cold storage and other food processing plants

• Devise transparent and inclusive policy frameworks that help manage the potential risks and trade-offs between private economic objectives and public goals

• Encourage PPPs through measures such as the reduction of financial and regulatory constraints for companies involved in the food chain

• Focus on access to export markets for agro-processing industries by setting up Agro Economic Zones for food processing similar to the existing Special Economic Zones

• Provide appropriate extension and technology dissemination services so that the private sector continues to innovate and invest in the supply chain

P

Promote R&D • Develop ICT applications for example that can enhance market access that require minimal

literacy • Devise and popularise low-cost online transactions • Research on international good practices that could be reproduced in Bangladesh

Train and strengthen capacities • Provide ICT training, especially for the most vulnerable groups

Promote practices • Popularise e-Commerce, especially for rural areas

Develop infrastructure • Expand Digital Centres in rural and peri-urban areas in collaboration with the private sector and NGOs • Facilitate SMS communication, community radio and television to share information on agriculture,

markets, self-employment creation, government services

Output indicators

• 7FYP: Upazila and Union Road network in good and fair condition (SDG indicator 9.1.1 Proportion of the rural

population who live within 2 km of an all- season road)

• Number of growth centers, rural markets, women market centers, and Union

II.2.1. Improve market infrastructures, physical access to market facilities

II.2.2. Enhance the role of the private sector and promote Public Private Partnership (PPP) investments through adequate public sector regulatory frameworks and TA support

II.2.3. Scale-up information dissemination, including the establishment of ICT facilities


Parishad Complexes developed by LGED and DAM

• Cold storage available in thousand MT • Number of Digital Centers across the

country at national and sub-national levels


• Number of food, market and infrastructure PPP contracts awarded (2015) by the PPP authority



2010-2021 • NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020

• National Nutrition Policy 2015 • National Agriculture Policy 2018 • National Livestock Development Policy

2007 • National Industrial Policy 2016 • National Women Development Policy 2011



The majority of projects under this programme, both ongoing and pipeline consist in building roads and bridges. This can only be considered as nutrition-supportive interventions, although they are paramount in developing economies and allowing access to markets. Because of this categorisation, only half of their budget is considered in the nutrition-weighed CIP2 budget; but these are costly endeavours, and in spite of this, they still weigh heavily in the overall CIP2 budget.


Sub-programmes Total Total Total Nutrition CIP2 existing gap weighted gap

II.2.1. Improve market infrastructures, physical access to market facilities 2640.1 1867.2 772.9 386.5 II.2.2. Strengthen private sector participation and public private partnerships 85.0 0.0 85.0 42.5 II.2.3. Scale-up information dissemination including the establishment of ICT facilities 10.0 4.8 5.1 2.6 Grand Total 2735.1 1872.0 863.1 431.5


Main implementing institutions LGED, MoA, MoI, Ministry of Women and Children Affairs (MoWCA) Private sector including BCSA, CSOs

International DPs involved IFAD, ADB, WB, EKN, DANIDA, IDB, DFID, JICA, GIZ, KFW


• Trade syndicates in markets can jeopardise the proper functioning of markets. • Limited literacy can constitute an obstacle to ICT use.


Programme III.1. Enhanced nutrition knowledge, promotion of good practices, and consumption of safe and nutritious diets

Programme aggregate output: Nutrition and health are improved through integrated short and long-term interventions.


Educate and sensitise • Educate community health workers and teachers on the importance of nutrition to mainstream it

in their messages to women and children through the NNS Operational Plan of the He alth, Population and Nutrition Sector Development Programme (HPNSDP)

• Build general awareness, especially of women, of the importance of a diverse and balanced diet with messages adapted to different audiences e.g. rural and urban through BCC strategies

• Sensitise women to the importance of nutrition received by a child in the 1000 days since conception

• Disseminate, regularly update Food Composition Tables and dietary guidelines and use them in food planning

• Incorporate school vegetable gardens and cooking demonstrations in curriculum

Promote practices • Demonstrate and disseminate appropriate methods to improve nutrition through low cost food

preparation and storage • Promote optimal IYCF practices on a nationwide basis • Encourage exclusive breastfeeding and appropriate complementary feeding from six months • Promote appropriate complementary feeding from 6 months, with emphasis on promoting

diversified diet, including animal sources of foods • Promote diets of pregnant women using tested tools, including food plates • Encourage regular intake of micronutrient-rich foods and animal source foods • Promote the consumption of fortified foods as appropriate • Carry out field training of nutrient dense recipes, adapting the delivery to different wealth groups and

in conjunction with BCC activities to sensitise people to nutrition matters • Use different media to spread these recipes

Promote research • Regularly update dietary guidelines • Investigate the changes occurring in consumption due to culture change, the influence from

external markets and the country's transition to middle-income country, making sure to understand differences between groups -geographical, local/urban, minorities, intra-household, male/female, socio-economic, etc.-

• Research the effects that changes in climate are having and are likely to have on diets • Explore options for viable substitutes of crops threatened by climate change to supply comparable

nutrients

OUTCOME III: IMPROVED DIETARY DIVERSITY, CONSUMPTION AND UTILISATION




Educate and sensitise • Sensitise policy makers to the nutritional problems associated with freer trade so as to envisage

changing trade policies to promote better nutrition and imposing taxes on ultra-processed foods e.g. sugar-sweetened drinks

• Scale up the implementation of national dietary guidelines through the national NCD strategy and NNS adjusting dietary and nutrient requirements as per age, activity levels and occupation

• Design mass-scale consumer information, BCC and public awareness campaigns to encourage consumption of healthy and nutritious foods and discourage/limit the consumption of highly processed sugar-rich, high fat and salty products

• Popularise prevention and control strategies through dissemination of diet and nutrition information through digitised technology and visual media at strategic points -hospitals, clinics, schools, universities, corporate offices, community centres and rural communities at large-

Build facilities • Provide facilities for physical activity accessible to all • Set up nutrition counselling clinics and centres • Provide diet and nutrition advisory services through mobile and virtual facilities and referrals

• Update the knowledge and research on development of improved nutrient dense recipes using local foods based on Food Composition Tables

• Analyse and validation of the recipes for nutrient density and nutrient returns for the money spent • Standardise healthy cooking techniques and practices to conserve nutrients and enhance

bioavailability of foods • Carry out acceptability trials and studies for scaling up the adoption of improved recipes to reduce

stunting, wasting and micronutrient deficiencies among the vulnerable groups, including pregnant and lactating women, infants and young children, and others across the life span

• Carry out sub-national level training and demonstrations to promote these recipes, adapting the delivery to different wealth groups to sensitise people to diversify their diets for better nutrition (Sub-programme III.1.1.)

• Utilise different media to disseminate these recipes for wider use

Output indicators

•

•

7FYP: Proportion of children under 6 months who are exclusively breastfed (%) PoA- CIP1: Share of total dietary energy supply for consumption from cereal and non-cereal

• Direct gender budgeting as % of Ministry of Food (MoFood) budget

• PoA- CIP1: Poor households raising home gardening and backyard poultry in selected vulnerable districts




Strategy 2010-2021 • NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020 • NPAN2

• Prevalence of diabetic cases • PoA- CIP1: Number of mass media

activities for BCC • Number of institutions promoting dietary

guidelines

• National Nutrition Policy 2015 • National Strategy on Prevention and

Control of Micronutrient Deficiency 2015-2024

• National Women Development Policy 2011 and its Plan of Action

• ICN2 (66 recommendations) • WHA Global Nutrition Target (6 Global

Nutrition Targets)

III.1.3. Knowledge based tools and research on the development and promotion of nutrient dense recipes using local foods for enhancing diversified food consumption to reduce stunting, wasting and micronutrient deficiencies


Major ongoing investment operations

Only BIRTAN’s ‘Integrated Agricultural Approach for Ensuring Nutrition and Food Security Project (BIRTAN phase)’ and LGED’s ‘Support to Urban Health and Nutrition to Bangladesh’ are ongoing under this programme. A subcomponent of the LDDRMPP envisages capacity building across the livestock and dairy value chain, enhancing consumer awareness and nutrition through behavioural change communication campaigns, safe animal source foods handling and preparation, nutritional aspects of milk-meat and its products and improving the diets of school children through milk and eggs incorporated in school nutrition programmes. Another component of a pipeline project on smallholder agricultural competitiveness focuses on improving diets, nutrition and product development for vulnerable smallholder groups and families, among other activities related to the horticulture value chain. Most other planned projects that have been included are part of the NNS.



Total existing

Total gap



36.4

3.5

32.8

26.5


31.9

31.9

0.0

0.0

III.1.3. Knowledge based tools and research on the development and promotion of nutrient dense recipes using local foods for enhancing diversified food consumption to reduce stunting, wasting and micronutrient deficiencies

20.9

0.0

20.9

16.4

Grand Total 89.2 35.4 53.8 42.9


Main implementing institutions Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Institute of Public Health and Nutrition (IPHN), BIRTAN, MoWCA, MoI, Ministry of Primary and Mass Education (MoPME), DAE, DLS, BARC, DAM, DoF Institute of Nutrition and Food Science (INFS), BBF, BNNC, BIRDEM, IFPRI, CSOs -including HKI, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B), World Fish, BRAC- and private sector

International DPs involved World Bank, Japan Debt Cancellation Fund (JDCF), WHO, UNICEF, WFP, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), JICA, USAID, EKN, DfID, FAO and EU


• Coordination between all stakeholders is essential to ensure a common approach. • Synergies are key with mechanisms such as SUN (with strategic focus on the first 1000 days of

life) and REACH. • Where the medium to long-term effects of the initiatives proposed in this programme need to be

complemented by immediate treatment of acute malnutrition, therapeutic and supplementary feeding measures should be put in place as appropriate.

• The promotion of fortified foods should not contravene the Breast-Milk Substitutes, Infant Foods, Commercially Manufactured Complementary Foods and the Accessories Thereof (Regulation of Marketing) Act 2013.


Programme III.2. Optimised food utilisation through provision of safe water, improved food hygiene and sanitation

Programme aggregate output: Measures are taken to optimise the use of the nutritional potential of foods.


• Build pumps that provide safe and clean water, especially even during the monsoon • Provide improved water supply to underserved, un-served and difficult to reach areas • Ensure access to safe drinking water to primary schools • Shift from underground to surface water sources • Ensure arsenic and saline screening of drinking water sources • Disseminate traditional filtering methods • Arrange accessibility to safe drinking water in rail stations, bus stands and terminal launches,

especially for disabled people, women and children

• Use TV, radio, local theatre and other media to sensitise people to the risks of contamination of food through humans

• Target mothers through healthcare workers • Provide bespoke training to food handlers in market and supermarkets, restaurateurs and street

vendors • Incorporate hygiene education in school curricula

Sensitise and educate people • Sensitise people to these issues through BCC making sure to adapt to different gender needs e.g.

split groups by gender when carrying out information meetings • Continue training imams so that they spread hygiene messages in particular in rural areas • Raise awareness on the dangers of animal cross-contamination through handling of animals -

especially poultry- in homesteads. Extension workers and the widespread network of NGOs may be used for this purpose.

Build and maintain infrastructure • Expand water and sanitation services to cover currently underserved areas • Build toilets taking into account possible different gender needs for e.g. in schools and the effect

of floods on the facilities • Arrange accessibility to toilets in rail stations, bus stands and terminal launches, especially for

disabled people, women and children

Output indicators

• 7FYP: Percentage of urban and rural population with access to safe drinking water (a. Urban, b. Rural) [SDG indicator 6.1.1. Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services]

• 7FYP: Percentage of urban and rural population with access to sanitary latrines

(a. Urban, b. Rural) [SDG indicator 6.2.1 Proportion of population using safely managed sanitation services, including a hand-washing facility with soap and water]

• Number of children aged 5 years or less admitted in upazila health complexes, at

III.2.1. Scale up the supply of safe water for consumption and domestic use

III.2.2. Ensure hygienic food handling, preparation and services, and scale-up hand washing behaviour

III.2.3. Improve sanitary facilities and practices -including the prevention of animal cross-contamination- for reducing diarrheal and food borne illness and child undernutrition


the district-level secondary hospitals and in medical college hospitals for diarrhea and gastroenteritis of infectious origin


• SDGs • Vision 2021 and its associated

Perspective Plan of Bangladesh 2010-2021

• National Sustainable Development Strategy 2010-2021

• NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020 • National Agriculture Policy 2018 • National Fisheries Policy 1998

• National Livestock Development Policy 2007 • Food Safety Act 2013 • Bangladesh Water Act 2013 • National Nutrition Policy 2015 • NPAN2 • National Women Development Policy

2011 and its Plan of Action


DPHE’s BRWSSP accounts for the biggest portion of the ongoing projects’ budget under this programme. Only five projects have been counted as currently ongoing under this programme and two in the pipeline.



Total existing

Total gap


III.2.1. Scale up the supply of safe water for consumption and domestic use 132.0 131.9 0.1 0.1

III.2.2. Ensure hygienic food handling, preparation and services, and scale-up hand washing behaviour 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0

III.2.3. Improve sanitary facilities and practices - including the prevention of animal cross- contamination- for reducing diarrheal and food borne illness and child undernutrition

6.1

6.1

0.0

0.0

Grand Total 138.9 138.8 0.1 0.1


Main implementing institutions MoFood, MoA, MoI, DPHE, IPHN, Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), DLS, LGED, Local Government Division, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives (LGD), DPHE WASH, ICDDR,B, Plan International, BRAC and other CSOs

International DPs involved UNICEF, FAO, WHO and EKN


• The improvement of sanitary facilities goes beyond the construction of latrines and requires infrastructure investments beyond the remit of the CIP2.


OUTCOME IV: ENHANCED ACCESS TO SOCIAL PROTECTION AND SAFETY NETS AND INCREASED RESILIENCE

Programme IV.1. Timely and effective disaster and preparedness responses through emergency food distribution, steps towards agricultural sector rehabilitation and mitigation measures

Programme aggregate output: Systems are in place to protect vulnerable groups’ food security during and after disasters


Develop households’ resilience to disasters • Promote homestead-based agriculture through projects such as ‘Ekti Bari Ekti Khamar’ • Encourage households to cultivate disaster-resilient crops through appropriate extension services

and other means

Strengthen capacities • Fully operationalise MRVA cell and Damage and Needs Assessment Cell by providing adequate

human and physical resources • Develop functional Early Warning System in line with the Bangladesh Environment, Forestry and

Climate Change Country Investment Plan 2016-2021

Take prompt remedial measures following disasters • Fast-track public and private distribution of agricultural inputs to the most vulnerable and women

in particular • Adapt extension services to post-disaster recovery (see Sub-programme I.1.2.) • Ensure access to markets is restored quickly (see Sub-programme II.2.1.)

• Facilitate access to credit and other financial services, such as insurance schemes for women, smallholders and the rural poor, by adapting the interest rates, the amounts that can be borrowed , simplifying procedures and matching the instalment and grace periods to the nature of the enterprise of the borrower

• Ensure coverage of deprived fishermen with social safety nets, such as VGD and VGF, and with alternative livelihoods support during the restriction period of fish catching

• Provide training to groups that depend on the exploitation of natural resources that are being overexploited e.g. forests or for those unable to cope with the unpredictability of climatic events to improve their employability in SMEs

• Collaborate with the local private sector and NGOs to identify skill needed to employ these groups

• Provide AIGAs in order to decrease reliance on resources vulnerable to climate change

Enhance infrastructure • Build modern food grain storage facilities, especially in disaster-prone areas

IV.1.1. Increase the resilience of agricultural systems, including the production of disaster-resilient nutritious crops especially by vulnerable populations


IV.1.3. Scale-up modern food storage facilities for improved Public Food Distribution System particularly in disaster-prone areas


• Ensure appropriate maintenance of existing go-downs and silos • Encourage appropriate household storage

Strengthen capacities • Provide staff training in public food management, effective response to emergencies • Improve supervisory and monitoring activities through logistics support • Introduce and develop ICT to manage the PFDS to improve efficiency and reduce losses • Investigate the possibility of introducing nutrient-rich foods, such as pulses and animal source

foods for example dried fish, in the PFDS

Output indicators

• 7FYP: Number of usable cyclone shelters

• 7FYP: Number of rural communities with disaster resilient habitats and communities’ assets

• Month of adequate household food provisioning

• Direct gender budgeting as % of Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief (MoDMR) budget

• PoA- CIP1: Effective gram storage capacity at close of fiscal year

• PoA- CIP1: Average use of effective GoB food grain storage capacity

• Actual closing stocks % of budget target • Environment CIP: Early warning

information enhanced through Regional and Global Initiatives (Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) and Letters of Agreement (LoAs)




(2010-2021) • NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020 • NSSS • National Nutrition Policy 2015

• NPAN2 • National Agriculture Policy 2018 • APA MoA 2016-17 • National Women Development Policy

2011 and its Plan of Action • Bangladesh Environment, Forestry and



The Ministry of Food's MFSP stands out among the ongoing projects. Many others are related to the management of areas at risk of flooding or erosion. There is little in the way of pipeline apart from the NNS emergency supplies programme which has been included under this programme.



Total existing

Total gap


IV.1.1. Increase the resilience of agricultural systems, including the production of disaster-resilient nutritious crops especially by vulnerable populations

724.4

724.3

0.1

0.1


2.3

1.6

0.7

0.5

IV.1.3. Scale-up modern food storage facilities for improved Public Food Distribution System particularly in disaster-prone areas

234.9

234.9

0.0

0.0

Grand Total 961.6 960.8 0.8 0.6



Main implementing institutions MoA, BARC, Ministry of Social Welfare (MoSW), MoFood, Ministry of Finance (MoF), MoFL, MoDMR, MoPME CSOs that intervene in disasters

International DPs involved World Bank, ADB, WFP, UNFPA, JICA, USAID, EKN, DfID and EU, LCG sub groups on Disaster and Emergency Relief and Poverty


• This programme involves a substantial number of actors whose coordination and collaboration is essential.

• The GoB faces the permanent challenge of having to reconcile the three objectives of the PFDS which simultaneously aims to: (i) support social safety nets; (ii) meet food and nutrition security needs arising from disasters; and (iii) stabilise food grain prices.

• An additional layer of complexity is now added by the recent NSSS’ plans to gradually shift from food-based to cash-based programmes.

• It is important that the initiatives to enhance the PFDS under the CIP2 and the NSSS are synchronised.

• Because of Bangladesh’s progress to lower middle-income status, TA commitments from international sources are likely to be lower in case of disasters hence the need to focus on measures with long-lasting positive effects on resilience.


Programme IV.2. Strengthened social protection and safety net programmes for targeted groups across the life cycle, including disabled and displaced population

Programme aggregate output: Effectiveness, targeting and content of social safety net programmes are improved to provide better protection to different vulnerable groups


• Adopt the life cycle approach adopted by the National Social Security Strategy (2015) for CIP2 investments to better meet the needs of people depending on their life stage i.e. preventive programmes for unborn children and their mothers into their childhood, promotive programmes for youth and adults, protective programmes for older and disabled people

• Enhance targeting, especially to reach children, women and the elderly, efficiency, effectiveness of Public Food Management Distribution and other safety nets

• Adapt cash and food transfers coherently to the GoB’s food stock management • Ensure synergies between programmes are fully exploited e.g. food or cash for work with

building of productive infrastructure such as irrigation, rural transport and markets

• Connect early warning systems with recovery programmes in areas most vulnerable to the effects of climate change for prompter actions

• Enhance targeting efficiency, effectiveness of Public Food Management Distribution and other safety nets in vulnerable and disadvantaged areas

• Carry out information campaigns on the existence of safety nets, their target groups and how to become a beneficiary

• Develop institutional capacity to effectively operate SSN programmes and coordinate them in vulnerable and disadvantaged areas

• Adapt cash and food transfers coherently to the GoB’s food stock management with the construction of storage in hard-to-reach areas

• Ensure synergies between programmes are fully exploited e.g. food or cash for work with building of productive infrastructure such as markets

• Research the FNS needs of the newly settled urban poor and how these can be met through SSNs

• Enhance fortified rice distribution under all distribution programmes • Investigate the possible introduction of other forms of nutrition supplementation • Investigate the advantages and feasibility of distributing foods with high nutritional content such

as dried fish, fish powder and pulses • Where possible, associate safety net programmes with education on nutrition, including which

foods should be consumed depending on the age of a person, and demonstration of recipes (see Sub-Programme II.1.3.)

• Promote and protect good dietary practices among children in places where there are school feeding programmes

• Expand school feeding programmes and consider reviewing their composition to deliver micronutrients to children to help early childhood development

• Consider making cash transfers conditional on participation in health or nutrition education programmes

• Incorporate explicit nutrition objectives and indicators in SSNs

IV.2.1. Expand and strengthen safety net programmes across the life cycle supporting vulnerable groups, such as poor women, children, the elderly, disabled people and displaced populations

IV.2.2. Expand and strengthen programmes for supporting people living in vulnerable and disadvantaged areas (char land, river bank, haors, hill tracts and urban areas)

IV.2.3. Introduce nutrition-sensitive social safety net programmes (SSNP), including food fortification especially for mothers and children


Output indicators

• PoA- CIP1: Budgeted coverage of VGF (lakh person) and VGD (lakh person month)

• PoA- CIP1: Quantity of VGF and Gratuitous Relief (GR) distributed (in thousand MT)

• PoA- CIP1: Safety net programmes expenditures as % of GDP [SDG indicator 1.3.1. Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing children, unemployed persons, older persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, newborns,

work injury victims and the poor and the vulnerable]

• Number of children covered by the School Feeding Programmes in Poverty Prone Areas (in tens of thousands)

• Coverage of people covered by the Allowance for the Financially Insolvent Disabled (in tens of thousands)

• Coverage of Old Age Allowance/Pension (in tens of thousands)

• Budgeted coverage of employment generation programme for the poor (in lakh person month)




Strategy (2010-2021) • NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020 • NSSS • National Nutrition Policy 2015 • NPAN2

• National Agriculture Policy 2018 • APA MoA 2016-17 • National Women Development Policy

2011 and its Plan of Action • Bangladesh Environment, Forestry and



Twenty projects are ongoing in this category, including DPE’s School Feeding programme. The two main projects in terms of financial needs in the pipeline belong to the Department of Cooperatives and are the ‘Livelihood improvement of disadvantaged women by rearing cows’ and ‘Livelihood improvement of the disadvantaged women’.



Total existing

Total gap


IV.2.1. Expand and strengthen safety net programmes across the life cycle supporting vulnerable groups such as poor women, children, the elderly, disabled people and displaced populations

227.3

182.3

44.9

33.7

IV.2.2. Expand and strengthen programmes for supporting people living in vulnerable and disadvantaged areas (char land, river bank, haors, hill tracts and urban areas)

473.4

464.1

9.3

7.0

IV.2.3. Introduce nutrition-sensitive social safety net programmes (SSNP) including food fortification especially for mothers and children

145.4

145.3

0.1

0.1

Grand Total 846.1 791.7 54.4 40.8



Main implementing institutions The 7FYP counts at least 23 ministries/divisions engaged in the country’s social net programme. The National Social Security Strategy groups them into five groups:

Lead coordination ministry Other implementing ministries

Social allowances Ministry of Social Welfare

Ministry of Women and Children Affairs, Ministry of Liberation War Affairs, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Ministry of Cultural Affairs, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives, Ministry of Labour and Employment etc.

Food security and disaster assistance Ministry of Food

Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Women and Children Affairs etc.

Social insurance

Ministry of Finance, with Bank and Financial Institutions Division and Insurance Development Regulatory Authority (IDRA), Ministry of Labour and Employment, and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare etc.

Labour/livelihoods interventions

Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief

Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives, Ministry of Women and Children Affairs, Ministry of Social Welfare, Palli Karma Shahayok Foundation, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Ministry of Labour and Employment etc.

Human development and social empowerment

Ministry of Primary and Mass Education

Ministry of Education, Ministry of Social Welfare, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare etc.

Source: 2015 NSSS

In addition to this, Bangladesh possesses an extensive number of NGOs as well as an increasing number of social enterprises involved in all areas proposed in this programme. All these actors could be involved in rendering existing safety nets more nutrition-sensitive.

International DPs involved World Bank, JICA, WFP, UNFPA, USAID, EKN, DflD, EU, LCG sub groups on Disaster and Emergency Relief and Poverty


• The GoB is planning to gradually switch its food-based programmes to cash-based ones, using the financial sector based G2P system. This means that awareness raising on what adequate diets are will become paramount since the opportunity that food-based programmes currently provide to enhance vulnerable people’s diets will disappear.

• The GoB will need to ensure that the recommended diets are affordable by those at the lower end of the wealth scale.

• The distribution of fortified foods should not contravene the Breast-Milk Substitutes, Infant Foods, Commercially Manufactured Complementary Foods and the Accessories Thereof (Regulation of Marketing) Act 2013.


Programme V.1. Improved food safety, quality control and assurance, awareness on food safety and hygiene

Programme aggregate output: Food safety is improved through the introduction of good practices at all steps of the food supply chain complemented by awareness raising and measures to ensure the conformity of foods for consumption


Streamline governance structure, policies and processes • Develop a national food control plan to delineate responsibilities and actions, facilitate laboratory

networking and sharing of data and information under the leadership of the BFSLN • Strict implementation of SOPs • Clarify process by which requests for risks analysis or specific requests for tests are carried out

and results fed back into the food chain production system • Adapt and enforce penalties for non-compliance to the laws and regulations • Enforcement of existing laws and rules regarding disease control, slaughter and quality control of

feeds

Build capacities • Increase the coverage of food items under the BSTI standards • Ensure effective monitoring by the BSTI and related agencies • Develop and expand capacity of laboratories and systems for food quality assurance and safety

and control of food and food borne illness surveillance including animal health • Develop countrywide food courts that test for adulteration of food or of the inputs that go into

producing and preparing food • Upgrade testing laboratories to international accreditation standards e.g. Organic, Fair Trade,

Global GAP, British Retail Consortium (BRC) to support export compliances • Strengthen the Bangladesh Accreditation Board (BAB) • Develop modern food testing techniques in conformity with the Codex Alimentarius • Train people to detect and assess food adulteration and contamination • Build quality assured and certified skills needed to participate in the food industry • Develop ICT systems for surveillance of food-related disease outbreaks

Training of farmers • To maintain and improve soil organic matter by methods appropriate to agronomic, environmental

and human health requirements • To ensure safe use of agrochemicals • To prevent residues from veterinary medications and other chemicals given in feeds from entering

the food chain • To minimise the non-therapeutic use of antibiotics on animals • To minimise risk of infection and disease by good pasture management, safe feeding, appropriate

stocking rates and good housing conditions

OUTCOME V: STRENGTHENED ENABLING ENVIRONMENT AND CROSS-CUTTING PROGRAMMES FOR ACHIEVING FNS

V.1.1. Ensure conformity of foods for consumption through accreditation from certification agencies, inspection and laboratory services



Train trainers • Train trainers in collaboration with the Ministry of Food and the Ministry of Fisheries and

Livestock on internationally recognised food control guidelines to ensure safe food production practices

Set standards and ensure compliance • Regularly check for adulteration of fertiliser at field level • Provide certification to hatcheries complying with set standards as well as agricul tural input

providers • Ban of fish fry and spawn that does not hold a quality certificate

Promote formation of clusters and zones • Form clusters and zones of farmers that will pursue GAP and GHP through maintenance of

traceability

• Develop guidelines on post-production good practices -GMP and GHP- which cover all steps of the processing chain -on-farm and off-farm processing, household and industrial processing, transporting, storing, displaying, selling- and are adapted to Bangladesh

• Disseminate the guidelines through training and BCC • Enforce HACCP operations

Train the relevant actors • To ensure clean and safe handling for on-farm processing of produce • To use recommended detergents and clean water for washing • To store food products under hygienic and appropriate environmental conditions • To pack food produce for transport from the farm in clean and appropriate containers • To process food according to set safety standards

Promote formation of clusters and zones • Form clusters and zones of farmers that will pursue GAP and GHP through maintenance of

traceability

• Raise awareness on food safety of different groups: cooks within the household, school children, men who often take care of the food shopping and women given their multiple roles in the household -preparing the food, distributing it, feeding children, storing it, etc.-

• Raise awareness of food safety issues among individuals able to influence the behaviour of consumers -community and religious leaders, journalists, etc.-

• Promote demand for food safety from consumers to encourage food producers and processors to respond to the demand

• Expand the work of Bangladesh Food Safety Network • Expand production and distribution of materials through the Directorate General of Health

Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning • Incorporate food safety messages to existing programmes -children's programmes, popular

serials- in addition to public service messaging

V.1.3. Introduce and scale-up good manufacturing practices (GMP) and good hygienic practices (GHP) including adherence to Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) compliance

V.1.4. Enhance food safety education, consumer awareness and food safety networks


Output indicators

• 7FYP: Percentage of urban solid waste regularly collected

• Farmers trained on use of organic fertiliser, green fertiliser and microbial fertiliser, in thousands

• Number of food safety management system certificates awarded by BSTI

• Number of food items standardised by BSTI

• Identified number of violation of food safety standard reported by BFSA

• Number of HACCP/ISMS certified institutions • Number of courses delivered on GAP, GHP

and GMP • Number of trainees that have benefited from

training on GAP, GHP and GMP • Number of food safety initiatives /days

observed




(2010-2021) • NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020 • NSSS • National Nutrition Policy 2015 • National Agriculture Policy 2018 • APA MoA 2016-17 • (draft) National Agricultural Extension

Policy 2015 • NPAN2 • National Livestock Development Policy

2007

• (draft) National Livestock Extension Policy (2012)

• National Shrimp Policy (2014) • Food Safety Act (2013) • National Skill Development Policy (2011) • Bangladesh Accreditation Act (2006) • Pesticides Act (2018) and Pesticide Rules

amended up to 2018 • Bangladesh Plant Quarantine Act (2011) • Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution

(BSTI) Ordinance 1985 amended as BSTI Act 2003

• Consumer Right Protection Act (2009)


In spite of being considered paramount in ensuring FNS in Bangladesh, this programme is small. The Ministry of Food, however, is planning to establish seven food laboratories throughout the country and the NNS has several components dealing with different aspects of this programme. A component of the LDDMPP also plans to look into these matters.



Total existing

Total gap


V.1.1. Ensure conformity of foods for consumption through accreditation from certification agencies, inspection and laboratory services

28.3 1.2 27.l 20.3


21.2 10.7 10.5 7.9

V.l.3. Introduce and scale-up good manufacturing practices (GMP) and good hygienic practices (GHP) including adherence to Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) compliance

19.5 0.0 19.5 14.7

V.1.4. Enhance food safety education, consumer awareness and food safety networks 13.6 0.0 13.6 10.2

Grand Total 82.6 11.9 70.8 53.1



Main implementing institutions BFSA, BAB, BSTI, National Food Safety Laboratory (NFSL), Institute of Public Health (IPH), Directorate General of Food (DGF), DoF, BLRI, Central Disease Investigation Laboratory (CDIL) (DLS), BARC, DAE (Plant Protection Wing - PPW), IPHN (DGHS), BLRI, IPH, DGHS, DPHE, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), BFSLN, MoA, MoFL, Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST), Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission (BAEC), National Consumer Rights Protection Council (NCRPC) and the Directorate of National Consumer Rights Protection (DNCRP) in particular, National Food Safety Management Advisory Council (NFSMAC) and the local government bodies, MoEFC and MoHFW, MoWCA, MoPME, Ministry of Education (MoEd), MoI, MoFL, MoFood; Armed Forces Food and Drug Laboratory, BARI (Toxicology Lab, etc.), local government (Public Health Laboratory (PHL)-(Dhaka City Corporation - DCC)

The non-profit sector such as the Bangladesh Crop Protection Association, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute (BFRI) and autonomous institutions -Institute of Food Science and Technology (IFST) BCSIR, BAEC, BARI and BRRI-, CAB, BBF; Public educational institutions -Centre for Advanced Research in Sciences (CARS), the Chemistry Department and Microbiology Department of Dhaka University; Department of Food Technology and Rural Industries (DFTRI), the Department of Biochemistry and the Department of Aquaculture of BAU- and SUN networks

International DPs involved EU, USAID, FAO, EKN, WHO


• Coordination is paramount given the number of regulatory bodies involved in safeguarding food safety from the moment it is produced to the moment it is ingested.

• The role of the private sector in food production is crucial and needs to be effectively regulated.


Programme V.2. Reduced post-harvest food losses and waste

Programme aggregate output: Food losses and waste are minimised throughout the production chain down to consumption by households.


Research • Identify reasons behind decision not to harvest -damage of crops by pests, disease and weather- • Investigate the effect of climate change on pest and diseases • Develop technologies or practices to minimise damage to crops

Educate farmers • Sensitise farmers regarding the appropriate stage of maturity to harvest crops to maintain their

quality throughout their post-harvest life

Mechanisation and partnerships creation • Encourage use of machinery to reduce harvest losses • Develop partnerships with the private sector or NGOs to encourage harvesting even when market

prices are too low to make harvesting worthwhile for farmers

Promote research and development • Develop techniques to use the part of agricultural production that is usually discarded e.g. rice

bran • Explore how unused foodstuffs may be used for other industrial uses

Develop infrastructure • Ensure continuous energy supply to prevent breaking of the cold chain • Create an enabling environment and investment climate to stimulate private sector investment in

processing facilities, especially for seasonal produce • Use ICTs to make food chains more efficient and thus reduce losses

Develop capacities and spread good practices • Encourage contract farming between processors and farmers • Develop knowledge and capacity of food chain operators to minimise spoilage of food • Spread efficient use of former foodstuffs as animal feed or compost

• Sensitise actors involved in the marketing chain as well as consumers to the problems of wastage and quality/quantity losses

• Incentivise retailers to adopt practices that minimise the problem of wastage • Develop a culture of avoiding wastage through BBC campaigns, introducing the issue to school

curricula, and through messages from influential people such as imams • Build capacities to evaluate food losses and waste at all stages of marketing and consumption • Carry out studies to measure food losses and waste • Inform consumers on the nutritional losses associated with certain methods of storage or

preparation e.g. through television cooking programmes (in association with the activities under Sub-programme III.1.1.).

Output indicators • Wastage as a proportion of agricultural produce, including sector specific proportions in

Bangladesh

V.2.1. Improve methods of measuring food losses and implement appropriate measures to minimise food losses at farm level


V.2.3. Reduce wastage and quality/quantity loss of food products at all stages of marketing and consumption



• SDGs • Seventh Five Year Plan (2016-20) • Vision 2021 and its associated Perspective


Strategy (2010-2021) • NFP 2006 • National Nutrition Policy 2015

• NPAN2 • National Agriculture Policy 2018 • APA MoA 2016-17 • Food Safety Act 2013

• Bangladesh Plant Quarantine Act 2011


This programme stands out for the absence of ongoing and pipeline projects. The extensive consultations leading to the development of this document clearly flagged the issue of food losses and waste as paramount and the lack of any development investment so far should motivate the GoB and DPs to channel funding towards these issues.



Total existing

Total gap


V.2.1. Improve methods of measuring food losses and implement appropriate measures to minimise food losses at farm level

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

V.2.3. Reduce wastage and quality/quantity loss of food products at all stages of marketing and consumption 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Grand Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


Main implementing institutions MoFood, MoA, MoFL Universities (BAU), IFPRI

International DPs involved FAO, EKN


• Knowledge and data about food losses and waste is limited in Bangladesh and major efforts will be needed to change this.

• Bangladesh should play an active role in the international initiatives that are taking place in this regard:

o the Committee of World Food Security (CFS 41st session) has called on public, private and civil society actors to promote a common understanding of FLW which will enable adequate monitoring and measurement.

o the SDGs have included a Global Food Loss Index to be developed by FAO for its target 12.3 to ‘by 2030, halve the per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer level, and reduce food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses’.

o a Global Initiative on Food Loss and Waste Reduction41 is also bringing together donors, bi- and multi-lateral agencies and financial institutions and private sector partners -the food packaging industry and others- to develop and implement the programme on food loss and waste reduction.

41 SAVE FOOD, led by FAO and Messe Dusseldorf.


Programme V.3. Improved information and data for evidence-based monitoring and adjustment of policies and programmes

Programme aggregate output: FNS-related decisions are based on evidence and high-quality, timely and comprehensive food security and nutrition analysis that draws on data and information available in the network of existing sector and stakeholder information systems.


Reinforce capacities • Strengthen capacities to undertake and analyse food consumption surveys and studies on FNS • Train relevant officials and individuals to use results from FNS surveys and studies

Fund surveys and studies • Enhance food and nutrition security surveillance specially to monitor change in diets of different

sections of the population • Conduct food consumption surveys on a regular basis • Fund studies on key drivers of poor dietary diversity and malnutrition and best practices • Widen studies on availability of food to nutrients available, not just quantity

Develop networks • Build infrastructure needed to develop a comprehensive network of food and nutrition security

information system • Contribute to the harmonisation of food and nutrition security information systems across sectors

to enable smooth exchanges • Facilitate the coordination of stakeholders • Advocate increased involvement of national stakeholders in statistical development

Make decision making, policy formulation and programming evidence-based • Integrate recommendations based on survey and study findings into new policies and strategies,

including in regular reviews of the CIP2 • Use regularly updated Food Composition Tables and use them to determine the needs for imports

given the actual and forecast production of different crops in view of the nutritional needs of the country

• Stimulate increased demand for better data

Output indicators

• PoA- CIP1: Existing food security and nutrition databases/surveillance systems


• SDGs • Seventh Five Year Plan (2016-20) • Vision 2021 and its associated Perspective


Strategy (2010-2021) • NFP 2006

• PoA- CIPl: Food Composition Tables

(PCT) updated/disseminated

• National Nutrition Policy 2015 • National Strategy for Development of

Statistics 2013 • Statistics Act 2013 • NPAN2

V.3.1. Produce more reliable and timely FNS information and data through improved information infrastructures, enhanced coordination in data collection and data exchange to improve evidence-based decision making, policy formulation and programming



A number of SDG indicators are relevant to the CIP2 and will be used once they become available. BBS, as part of the NSDS Implementation Support Project (2013-2023), is starting to develop projects that will help collect and measure data to fill existing gaps in the SDG result s framework but this is not yet included as pipeline projects. The whole NSDS is costed at around US$600 million with four priority areas: improving the quality, coverage, and use of core statistics required for national planning and economic management and for monitoring progress towards national goals; strengthening the professionalism of the NSS; building capacity to collect, compile, disseminate, and, especially, use statistics at the local level; and promoting and strengthening access to, and the use of, official statistics at all levels of the society, based on an ‘open-data strategy’.



Total existing

Total gap


V.3.1. Produce more reliable and timely FNSinformation and data through improved information infrastructures, enhanced coordination in data collection and data exchange to improve evidence-based decision making, policy formulation and programming

46.5 45.3 1.3 0.6

Grand Total 46.5 45.3 1.3 0.6


Main implementing institutions BBS, DAM, DAE, Bangladesh Bank, Nutrition Information and Planning Unit (NIPU), FPMU, National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), MoFL, Finance Division, Health Information Services of the DGHS, ERD Partnership in Statistics for Development in the 21st Century (PARIS21) and CSOs (HKI)

International DPs involved FAO, UNICEF, WFP, WHO, EKN, World Bank


• Coordinating all actors involved in this programme will be challenging given the host of stakeholders involved i.e. data users and producers.


Programme V.4. Strengthened FNS governance, capacity strengthening and leadership across FNS relevant stakeholders

Programme aggregate output: National capacities to design and implement and monitor policies, investment plans, programmes and legal frameworks are enhanced


• Improve management and coordination capacities in core departments of the Ministries of Agriculture, Fisheries and Livestock, Food, Health and Family Welfare, Women and Children Affairs

• Develop coordination between GoB agencies and other FNS frameworks such as the SUN initiative or networks working to integrate the Right to Food to the Constitution

• Ensure that nutrition objectives are incorporated in all sector development programmes that impinge on food systems through trainings, organisation of events, meetings, publications

• Involve civil society in the development and monitoring of FNS-related policies and programmes by making processes more transparent and regularly sharing information through the media and public meetings

• Involve all stakeholders in the design and monitoring of policies and programmes • Continue enhancing the role of FPMU as a key player in the development, implementation and

monitoring of a number of policies, strategies and programmes -NFP, CIP2, NPAN2, SDG2- • Develop the capacities to contribute to the development and monitoring and implementation of

food systems-related documents of other stakeholders -government, including local governments, civil society and the private sector-

• Develop a cadre of government officials that have cross-sectoral knowledge and understanding of food systems and remain in positions related to FNS

Output indicators

• PoA- CIP1: Additional resources mobilised for the CIP2 in million USD

• PoA- CIP1: Increase in ongoing projects (number and value)

• SUN index for ‘Bringing people together into a shared space for action’

• Right to Food issues discussed by policy makers and at Parliamentary level



Plan of Bangladesh 2010-2021

• National Sustainable Development Strategy (2010-2021)

• NFP 2006 • Seventh Five Year Plan 2016-2020

V.4.1. Strengthen existing national coordination mechanisms liaising with existing FNS frameworks, clusters and networks including the SUN initiative and networks working towards integrating the Right to Food to the Constitution

V.4.2. Strengthen capacities to design and monitor the new Food and Nutrition Security Policy and implement, monitor and coordinate the CIP2




Sub-programmes Total Total Total Nutrition CIP2 existing gap weighted gap

V.4.1. Strengthen existing national coordination mechanisms liaising with existing FNS frameworks, clusters and networks including the SUN initiative and networks working towards integrating the Right to Food to the Constitution 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 V.4.2. Strengthen capacities to design and monitor the new Food and Nutrition Security Policy and implement, monitor and coordinate the CIP2 98.0 80.0 18.0 9.0 Grand Total 98.3 80.0 18.4 9.2


Main implementing institutions MoFood and the FPMU in particular, ERD, all the ministries included in the Technical Working Groups CSOs e.g. BNNC, Nagorik Uddyog, Campaign on Right to Food and Social Security (RtF&SS) and Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST), universities

International DPs involved EU, USAID, FAO, ADB, WHO, EKN, LCGs relevant to FSN


• The main implementation challenge in this programme is the recognition by all ministries and departments of the Government involved in the food system of their role and the need for them to coordinate their actions with others.

The ‘Revitalization & operation (Inter-ministerial & multi sectoral coordination) of BNNC’ component of the NNS has been included as pipeline project as well as the MUCH project. This latter project assists the GoB to achieve a strengthened enabling environment for eradicating food insecurity and malnutrition, developing human and institutional capacities for designing and imple-menting food security policies and monitoring their implementation, with a specific focus on the Country Investment Plan.

Annex 5. Details of the cost and financing of the CIP2

This annex provides the data and a detailed explanation of the method used to estimate the cost and financing requirements for the CIP2 as well as an inventory of all the ongoing and pipeline projects included in the CIP2. The cost and financing requirements of the CIP2 are estimated based on:

1. an estimate of available financing of CIP2 activities from ongoing investment activities financed by the Government and DPs;

2. additional funds required based on the needs to achieve the CIP2 results and outcomes described in Section 10;

3. a priority ranking of each project on the basis of their relevance to nutrition.

What is included in the CIP2: public investments

The CIP2 includes public investments between July 2016 and June 2020, i.e. investments channelled through the ADP, which is the government process used to allocate resources on an annual basis in support of investments from existing budget sources and DP contributions.

While the food systems approach adopted in the CIP2 (see Section 4) means the breadth of elements and interconnections considered is extensive, not all investments that can potentially affect food and nutrition security can be included as in some cases, other mechanisms and planning tools are more appropriate. Thus, the following are specifically excluded from the CIP2 to avoid duplications and set boundaries to its remit:

• purely policy and legal measures - the CIP is a means to implement existing policies; • the distribution of food through the Public Food Distribution System and all safety net

programmes which represented 9.55% in 2015/16 of total government spending42, unless they are considered as investments and therefore appear in the ADP43. The CIP2 however does advocate for investments to enhance access to nutrition-sensitive social protection and safety nets and increased resilience;

• subsidies for agricultural inputs, i.e. fertilisers, which are covered by regular budgetary means; • direct transfers from DPs to implementers not linked to the ADP; • family planning activities which is the responsibility of public health planning; • private investment, although one important objective of the CIP2 is to finance public goods to

stimulate investment by smallholder producers and leverage private investment through the promotion of PPPs. Projects under the CIP2 may therefore enable the creation of PPPs through the provision of technical assistance for their development, and facilitate their operations.

While all investments undertaken by the Government are channelled through the ADP, only part of the DP contribution is. The part that is not channelled through the ADP, such as finance to NGOs to undertake certain activities, is therefore not included in the CIP2. Finally, because the CIP2 is about nutrition-sensitive food systems, the focus is on projects that are nutrition-sensitive or nutrition-supportive, rather than nutrition-specific which is the remit of the NPAN2.

This cost exercise therefore provides an estimate of: the ongoing investments reclassified according to the 13 programmes and 39 sub-programmes;


the existing available resources already committed through the ADP, including those financed by the budget and by the DPs;

the financial gap to be filled.

Two types of figures will be provided: totals and figures ‘prioritised’ according to their role in addressing FNS, as explained below.

Identification of projects

The Government's ADP was systematically scrutinised for ongoing projects relevant to the CIP2 programmes. The Planning Commission formulates the ADP in light of the objectives defined in the 7FYP with which the CIP2 is aligned. It is the budgetary tool used to allocate resources on an annual basis in support of investment i.e. excluding current expenditures. IMED documents then provide the financial information required for the CIP2 budgeting, namely: the total project budget, the residual budget for the CIP2 and the yearly expenditure. This information is provided disaggregated by source i.e. Government and DP in Table A5.5. The ADP book also lists pipeline projects which are required to calculate the CIP2 financing gap. In some cases, this information was not included in this document but provided by relevant members of the Government. The listing of this planned spending is provided disaggregated by source i.e. Government and DP in Table A5.6. The term project is used for ongoing projects but also for planned investments whether or not they represent actual projects. It may be for example that the Government plans to streamline a development activity and has allocated a certain amount but not yet developed specific projects to implement this activity. The exchange rate used for calculation is US$ 1 = 78.4 Taka44

Classification of projects

Over two hundred ongoing projects and over 100 planned interventions were identified to be included in the CIP2. Each of these was scrutinised to decide which programme and sub-programme they should be classified under. In some cases, projects have several components, some of which fall under different sub-programmes, or some of which are not relevant to the CIP2. In such instances, when available, the budget allocated to each component was used to apportion the component to the relevant sub-programmes. In cases where the budget by component was not available, the proportion allocated under each sub-programme was calculated by weighting all identifiable components equally. Efforts have been made to obtain more detailed information from managers or other stakeholders in ambiguous cases, but responses were not always obtained. Further versions of the CIP2 will endeavour to refine this information.

MAFAP

The classification of CIP2 projects according to the programmes and sub-programmes identified based on priorities expressed by stakeholders was assisted by MAFAP (Monitoring and Analysing Food and Agricultural Policies). This programme is implemented by FAO and seeks to establish country-owned and sustainable systems to monitor, analyse, and reform food and agricultural policies to enable more effective, efficient and inclusive policy frameworks in developing and emerging economies. The methodology used by MAFAP can provide useful insights on the composition of public investments in the CIP2. MAFAP was initiated in 2009 and it is currently in its second phase (2014-2019) which focuses on building on the partnerships and evidence created to support governments to reform food and agricultural policies that are currently constraining agricultural development, especially for smallholders. Combining the CIP2 and MAFAP classification -based on


Food Availability Food Access Food Utilisation Food Stability

l Domestic productionl Import capacityl Food stocksl Food aid

l Poverty and incomel Markets

l Water, sanitation and healthl Care and feeding practices

l Climate and weather variabilityl Political factorsl Economic factors

economic characteristics of expenditure- allows for an additional layer of information on the composition of investments, which can be useful to policy makers to analyse how their investments link to the FNS performance. The MAFAP’s Public Expenditure (PE) analysis for FSN follows the definition that was agreed upon in the World Food Summit in 1996: ‘Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life’ based on which four pillars of food security have been recognised: availability, access, utilisation and stability (Figure A.5.1.). Figure A5.1. The four dimensions of food security and nutrition and their determinants

Source: FAO The MAFAP FSN PE methodology follows the following logic. First, it determines whether the expenditure is a FSN-specific or a FSN-supportive expenditure. Within FSN-specific expenditure a distinction is drawn depending on the recipient of the transfer. The expenditures can be aimed at individual agents e.g. producer, consumer, processors, suppliers, etc., or the sector as a whole e.g. research. In the case of FSN-supportive expenditures, these include, among other things, key infrastructure spending such as spending on roads and electricity. A key underlying characteristic of the MAFAP methodology is that the classification is based on the economic characteristics of the expenditure. In other words, it is categorised according to the purpose of the expenditure and how the expenditure is implemented. 45 With regards to the nutrition weights, the MAFAP programme does not attribute nutrition weights to categories. The evidence supporting the range of weights currently suggested in the literature are not yet deemed fully convincing from a methodological perspective and remain very contex t-specific. However, given the importance for the Government to prioritise investments based on the potential impacts on nutrition, these weights can be added by policy makers and nutrition experts, wishing to prioritise investments based on their perceived impact on nutrition. This was done in the context of the CIP2 (see section on Prioritisation below) and the MAFAP framework was adapted to allow this information to be added.

Prioritisation

Because the focus of the CIP2 is on nutrition-sensitive food systems, two budgets are provided. One with the full amount of the ongoing and pipeline expenditures and another where these expenditures have been prioritised based on the extent to which projects are bound to have a role in achieving positive nutritional outcomes, with weights associated to their potential impact. This type of analysis advocated by the SUN initiative allows the tracking of resources contributing to nutrition which can help countries prioritise, better plan their resource allocations and advocate for increasing funding. Based on the 2013 Lancet series on Maternal and Child Nutrition, the SUN proposes to classify projects into two groups: 45 For a full list of the categories covered by the MAFAP classification and a detailed explanation of the underlying methodology, see: FAO. 2016. Analysis of Public Expenditure towards Food Security and Nutrition. MAFAP Methodology working paper, FAO, Rome, Italy.


- nutrition-specific: high-impact nutrition actions that aim to address immediate and some intermediate causes of malnutrition and undernutrition such as dietary intake and feeding practices.

- nutrition-sensitive: projects that incorporate nutrition objectives to address critical underlying determinants of undernutrition. Nutrition-sensitive approaches include agriculture; clean water and sanitation; food safety; food losses and waste; education and employment; healthcare; support for resilience and women's empowerment.

For the purpose of the CIP2, three categories of projects are considered: - ‘nutrition-sensitive +’: certain interventions categorised by the Lancet as nutrition-sensitive are

likely to have a more direct impact on nutritional outcomes e.g. promotion of dietary guidelines linked with national NCD strategies and related nutrition services. They have the potential to be leveraged to serve as delivery platforms for nutrition-specific interventions. They are given a greater weight in the nutrition budget given their more direct impact;

- nutrition-sensitive; - nutrition-supportive: this third category is created for projects that create an environment that is

necessary for nutrition-sensitive or nutrition-specific projects to take place. This is not usually considered in nutrition budgets and yet bears a crucial role, albeit indirect, in the achievement of positive nutritional outcomes. Examples of this are the construction of infrastructure such as roads which will allow access to markets. It is also the case of strengthening of capacities to implement FNS-related policies. Such interventions are often sector-wide in nature which justifies not including their full cost under the CIP2.

The category attributed to each project is indicated in the inventory of projects provided in Table A5.5 of Annex 5. Weights are attributed to each type of project, yielding a nutrition-sensitive CIP2 budget. These weights are as follows:

- 100% for ‘nutrition-sensitive+’ projects - 75% for nutrition-sensitive projects - 50% for nutrition-supportive projects.

These numbers have been selected to be able to prioritise the CIP2 according to its nutrition orientation but have no justification other than wanting to create a hierarchy in the degree of relevance to nutrition. Such exercises have been carried out in other countries, but the brea dth of values chosen reflects the arbitrariness of such endeavour. To give but an example, drinking water supply project have been given a weight ranging from 10% to 100% in different country scenarios 46. Table A5.1. shows how different types of projects have been classified.


Table A5.1. Weights for different types of projects

CIP2 pillar Typology Category Weight

I. Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for health diets

Agriculture production development sensitive 75% Agriculture production development focused on nutritious crops sensitive 75% Extension services sensitive 75% Nutrition-sensitive extension services sensitive 75% Agricultural input development, promotion and distribution sensitive 75% Irrigation development and improvement sensitive 75% River restoration (dredging, building embankments, etc.) supportive 50% Aquaculture and fisheries sensitive 75% Poultry and livestock development sensitive 75% Inputs for animal farming sensitive 75%


Agro processing (infrastructure development, training, etc.) supportive 50% Market bargaining power supportive 50% Market infrastructures and physical access to market facilities supportive 50% Inclusion of private sector supportive 50% Market information and dissemination supportive 50%


Nutrition training and BCC sensitive+ 100% Prevention and control of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) sensitive+ 100% Promotion of dietary guidelines linked with national NCD strategies and related nutrition services

sensitive+

100%

Knowledge based tools and research on the development and promotion of nutrient dense recipes

sensitive+

100%

Supply of safe water for consumption and domestic use sensitive 75% Hygienic food handling, preparation and services, and hand washing behaviour

sensitive

75%


Sanitary facilities and practices sensitive 75% Resilience of agricultural systems (shelters, embankments against erosion, etc.)

sensitive

75%

Social safety nets in times of crisis sensitive 75% Storage for more efficient PFDS sensitive 75% Social safety nets across the life cycle and in disadvantaged areas sensitive 75% Nutrition-sensitive social safety nets sensitive 75% Food safety sensitive 75% Food losses sensitive 75% Information for evidence-based policy making and monitoring supportive 50% Coordination mechanisms supportive 50% Capacities to design, implement and monitor NFP supportive 50%

Estimates

The CIP2 is estimated at a total of US$ 9.3 billion as of June 2016, US$ 3.6 billion of which are pipeline projects for which funds need to be mobilised. DPs contribute to 38.8% of the ongoing projects (Table A5.2). Twenty projects account for over 50% of the total CIP2 ongoing budget47. When weighing the budget according to its nutrition sensitivity, its total declines to US$ 5.6 billion, or by 43%, and the financing gap to US$ 2.4 billion, or by 34% (Table A5.3). The lower proportional decline for the pipeline projects compared to the ongoing projects indicates the planned projects have a greater nutrition focus or a less nutrition-supportive nature than the operationalised projects.

Even after giving greater weight to nutrition-sensitive projects, the overall CIP2 budget is highly biased towards Pillar I ‘Diversified and sustainable agriculture, fisheries and livestock for healthy diets’ as shown in Figure A5.2. This propensity is even more evident when measured by the nutrition weighting.

47 Because the pipeline includes big interventions which have not necessarily been articulated into projects, as it stands, ten recorded interventions constitute almost 80% of the total pipeline budget.


V. Strengthened enabling environment and cross- cutting programmes for achieving food andnutrition security

While it reflects the country’s focus on developing agriculture to respond to the ever-increasing food requirements, it is also attributed to the fact that projects needed under this pillar are often costly. The development by BCIC of a fertiliser factory alone costs over a billion US$. Projects related to irrigation which fall under this pillar also require substantial amounts of funding. The small share of Pillar III ‘Improved dietary diversity, consumption and utilisation’ is explained by the fact that many projects falling under this category are nutrition-specific, therefore falling outside the remit of the CIP2. However, it is a clear indication that more efforts are needed in this area to support the NPAN2 through nutrition-sensitive projects, especially given that nutrition-sensitive programmes can serve as delivery platforms for nutrition-specific interventions, potentially increasing their scale, coverage, and effectiveness (see the Lancet series on Maternal and Child Nutrition, 2013). The fact that Pillar V ‘Strengthened enabling environment and cross-cutting programmes for achieving food and nutrition security’ only represents 3% of the public investment highlights the need for an urgent mobilisation of funds especially for programmes V.1. and V.2. on ‘Improved food safety, quality control and assurance, awareness on food safety and hygiene’ and ‘Reduced food losses and waste’ which are essential to attain FNS targets and require significant investments. The MAFAP classification shown in Figure A5.3. elucidates a functional decomposition of the nutrition-weighted CIP2 budget according to the economic characteristics of the expenditures. Information on the composition of the expenditure can then be a useful tool for policy makers to further analyse the composition of their investments in FNS. Specifically, in the case of the CIP2, roads, irrigation, water and flood management, payments to suppliers -mostly investments on fertiliser factories- account for over half of the nutrition-weighted CIP2 expenditure. This is further illustrated by Table A5.4., which shows that over half of the CIP2 budget is allocated to nutrition -supportive projects. While such endeavours are necessary to bring about the changes needed, it is clear that the Government will need to refocus government and DP spending priorities towards nutrition-sensitive projects if it wants to achieve the CIP2’s goals.


The CIP2 is a strategic tool for integrating investments for nutrition-sensitive food systems into a comprehensive results framework which will help mobilise financial resources to respond to arising needs over the Plan timeline. To achieve its outcomes, the CIP needs to be implemented through coherent planning, budgeting and financing processes that harness all resources, while building on existing synergies and avoiding duplications. Efforts are needed to rationali se the mobilisation of financial resources by ensuring:

- Regular consultations on the mobilisation and use of financial resources with FPMU, the Ministry of Finance, the Planning Commission, and all line ministries and DPs involved in the CIP2;

- Quality monitoring of disbursed, available and pledged financial resources followed by an effective dissemination of the results; and

- Regular fora to promote private investment in FNS involving the private sector, farmer organisations, CSOs, line ministries and the Chamber of Commerce.

Keeping track of the spending progress is particularly important in view of the limited execution performance observed in the monitoring of the first CIP. To this effect, investment absorption capacity must be enhanced. This requires capacity development support of stakeholders, and especially government agencies involved, as is proposed under Programme V.4. Finally, the GoB and the DPs should focus their efforts on financing the resource gap and prioriti sing nutrition-sensitive activities. They should also invest in projects that will help leverage investments and resources from the private sector, farmer organisations and CSOs. Dialogue will be required throughout to avoid duplications of efforts in a country with a high density of donors and NGOs and good practices will be actively sought to be scaled up, especially those relating to contractual arrangements, e.g. contract farming and supply chains, and PPPs.


Tab

le A

5.2.

Exi

stin

g fin

anci

ng a

nd a

dditi

onal

req

uire

men

ts p

er p

rogr

amm

e an

d su

b-pr

ogra

mm

e (in

mill

ion

US$

)

C

IP2

(exi

stin

g re

sour

ces +

gap

) E

xist

ing

reso

urce

s

Fina

ncin

g ga

p T

otal

G

oB

DPs

I.

Div

ersi

fied

and

sust

aina

ble

agri

cultu

re, f

ishe

ries

and

live

stoc

k fo

r he

alth

y di

ets

3,81

5 1,

633

1,31

2 32

0 2,

182

I.1. S

usta

inab

le in

tens

ifica

tion

and

dive

rsifi

catio

n of

cro

p-ba

sed

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

s 62

2 18

4 14

7 37

43

8 I.1

.1. E

nhan

ce a

gric

ultu

ral r

esea

rch

and

know

ledg

e, a

nd te

chno

logy

dev

elop

men

t for

m

ore

prod

uctiv

e, d

iver

se, s

usta

inab

le a

nd n

utrit

ion-

sens

itive

agr

icul

ture

24

7 74

65

9

172

I.1.2

. Dev

elop

tech

nolo

gies

incl

udin

g bi

otec

hnol

ogie

s and

mea

sure

s to

adap

t agr

icul

tura

l sy

stem

s to

clim

ate

chan

ge

163

22

8 14

14

1

I.1.3

. Im

prov

e an

d ex

pand

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve e

xten

sion

pro

gram

mes

and

agr

icul

tura

l ad

viso

ry se

rvic

es

213

88

74

14

124

I.2. I

mpr

oved

acc

ess,

qual

ity a

nd m

anag

emen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral i

nput

s, in

clud

ing

wat

er a

nd la

nd

2,40

1 1,

150

897

253

1,25

1

I.2.1

. Enh

ance

ava

ilabi

lity

and

effic

ient

use

of a

fford

able

and

qua

lity

inpu

ts (s

eeds

, fe

rtilis

ers,

pest

icid

es) a

nd c

redi

t for

safe

and

div

ersi

fied

crop

s 1,

280

214

187

27

1,06

6

I.2.2

. Pre

serv

e ag

ricul

tura

l lan

d fe

rtilit

y an

d es

tabl

ish

land

righ

ts o

f mos

t vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns

40

40

40

- -

I.2.3

. Im

prov

e w

ater

man

agem

ent t

hrou

gh c

onse

rvat

ion,

sust

aina

ble

extra

ctio

n an

d di

strib

utio

n of

gro

und

wat

er a

nd e

ffici

ent u

se o

f sur

face

wat

er fo

r irr

igat

ion

1,01

7 83

2 60

5 22

6 18

5

I.2.4

. Miti

gate

the

effe

cts o

f sal

ine

wat

er in

trusi

on a

nd it

s im

pact

on

food

pro

duct

ion

and

impl

icat

ions

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

64

64

64

- -

I.3. E

nhan

ced

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd su

stai

nabl

e pr

oduc

tion

of a

nim

al so

urce

food

s

792

299

268

30

493

I.3.1

. Im

prov

e m

anag

emen

t of f

ishe

ries,

lives

tock

and

pou

ltry

to in

crea

se p

rodu

ctio

n an

d pr

oduc

tivity

and

nut

ritio

nal v

alue

whi

le e

nsur

ing

sust

aina

bilit

y 24

5 15

2 13

2 21

93

I.3.2

. Sus

tain

mic

ronu

trien

t-ric

h an

imal

food

pro

duct

ion

thro

ugh

cons

ervi

ng fi

sher

ies a

nd

lives

tock

bio

dive

rsity

12

8 91

91

-

37

I.3.3

. Stre

ngth

en su

stai

nabl

e sh

rimp

aqua

cultu

re, m

arin

e fis

herie

s and

farm

ing

syst

ems

adap

ted

to g

eogr

aphi

cal z

ones

24

5 21

11

10

22

4

I.3.4

. Im

prov

e fis

herie

s, liv

esto

ck a

nd p

oultr

y he

alth

serv

ices

, qua

lity

inpu

ts a

nd

surv

eilla

nce

17

4 35

34

0

139

II. E

ffic

ient

and

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve p

ost-

harv

est t

rans

form

atio

n an

d va

lue

addi

tion

3,

172

1,92

5 1,

465

460

1,24

7 II

.1. S

tren

gthe

ned

post

-har

vest

val

ue c

hain

with

par

ticul

ar fo

cus o

n M

SME

s (st

orag

e,

proc

essi

ng, b

rand

ing,

labe

lling

, mar

ketin

g an

d tr

ade)

43

7 53

37

16

38

4

II.1

.1. D

evel

op sk

ills a

nd st

reng

then

cap

acity

to p

roce

ss a

nd su

pply

safe

and

nut

rient

-rich

fo

ods w

ith e

mph

asis

on

qual

ity st

anda

rds a

nd n

utrie

nt la

belli

ng in

form

atio

n

48

8 0

7 41

II.1

.2. A

dopt

app

ropr

iate

tech

nolo

gy a

nd st

reng

then

infra

stru

ctur

e to

allo

w q

ualit

y im

prov

emen

t, va

lue

addi

tion

and

forti

ficat

ion

of fo

ods

28

7 14

14

-

273

II.1

.3. M

obili

se a

nd p

rom

ote

prod

ucer

and

mar

ketin

g gr

oups

for i

mpr

oved

mar

ket a

cces

s an

d ba

rgai

ning

pow

er, e

spec

ially

for w

omen

and

smal

lhol

ders

10

2 32

23

9

70

II.2

. Im

prov

ed a

cces

s to

mar

kets

, fac

ilitie

s and

info

rmat

ion

2,73

5 1,

872

1,42

8 44

4 86

3 II

.2.1

. Im

prov

e m

arke

t inf

rast

ruct

ures

, phy

sica

l acc

ess t

o m

arke

t fac

ilitie

s 2,

640

1,86

7 1,

427

440

773

II.2

.2. S

treng

then

priv

ate

sect

or p

artic

ipat

ion

and

priv

ate-

publ

ic p

artn

ersh

ips

85

- -

- 85

II

.2.3

. Sca

le-u

p in

form

atio

n di

ssem

inat

ion

incl

udin

g th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f IC

T fa

cilit

ies

10

5 0

4 5


C

IP2

Exi

stin

g re

sour

ces

(e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s + g

ap)

Tot

al

GoB

D

Ps

Fina

ncin

g ga

p II

I. Im

prov

ed d

ieta

ry d

iver

sity

, con

sum

ptio

n an

d ut

ilisa

tion

228

174

118

56

54

III.1

. Enh

ance

d nu

triti

on k

now

ledg

e, p

rom

otio

n of

goo

d pr

actic

es, a

nd c

onsu

mpt

ion

of

safe

and

nut

ritio

us d

iets

89

35

9

27

54

III.1

.1 S

cale

up

nutri

tion

train

ing,

beh

avio

ur c

hang

e co

mm

unic

atio

ns (B

CC

) for

enh

ance

d kn

owle

dge,

safe

stor

age,

hou

seho

ld p

roce

ssin

g an

d im

prov

ed c

onsu

mpt

ion

36

4

2 2

33

III.1

.2. P

reve

nt a

nd c

ontro

l non

-com

mun

icab

le d

isea

ses (

NC

Ds)

and

ens

ure

heal

thy

diet

s th

roug

h pr

omot

ion

of d

ieta

ry g

uide

lines

link

ed w

ith n

atio

nal N

CD

stra

tegi

es a

nd re

late

d nu

tritio

n se

rvic

es

32

32

7 25

0

III.1

.3. K

now

ledg

e ba

sed

tool

s and

rese

arch

on

the

deve

lopm

ent a

nd p

rom

otio

n of

nut

rient

de

nse

reci

pes u

sing

loca

l foo

ds fo

r enh

anci

ng d

iver

sifie

d fo

od c

onsu

mpt

ion

to re

duce

stu

ntin

g,

was

ting

and

mic

ronu

trien

t def

icie

ncie

s 21

-

- -

21

III.2

. Opt

imis

ed fo

od u

tilis

atio

n th

roug

h pr

ovis

ion

of sa

fe w

ater

, im

prov

ed fo

od

hygi

ene

and

sani

tatio

n

139

139

110

29

0

III.2

.1. S

cale

up

the

supp

ly o

f saf

e w

ater

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

dom

estic

use

13

2 13

2 10

9 23

0

III.2

.2. E

nsur

e hy

gien

ic fo

od h

andl

ing,

pre

para

tion

and

serv

ices

, and

scal

e-up

han

d w

ashi

ng b

ehav

iour

1

1 0

1 0

III.2

.3. I

mpr

ove

sani

tary

faci

litie

s and

pra

ctic

es -i

nclu

ding

the

prev

entio

n of

ani

mal

cro

ss-

cont

amin

atio

n- fo

r red

ucin

g di

arrh

eal a

nd fo

od b

orne

illn

ess a

nd c

hild

und

ernu

tritio

n

6 6

1 5

-

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n an

d sa

fety

net

s and

incr

ease

d re

silie

nce

1,80

8 1,

752

530

1,22

2 55

IV

.1. T

imel

y an

d ef

fect

ive

disa

ster

pre

pare

dnes

s and

res

pons

es th

roug

h em

erge

ncy

food

dis

trib

utio

n, st

eps t

owar

ds a

gric

ultu

ral s

ecto

r re

habi

litat

ion

and

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

962

961

161

800

1

IV.1

.1. I

ncre

ase

the

resi

lienc

e of

agr

icul

tura

l sys

tem

s, in

clud

ing

the

prod

uctio

n of

di

sast

er-r

esili

ent n

utrit

ious

cro

ps e

spec

ially

by

vuln

erab

le p

opul

atio

ns

724

724

112

612

0

IV.1

.2. E

nsur

e so

cial

and

eco

nom

ic a

cces

s to

food

for t

he p

oore

st se

ctio

ns o

f the

po

pula

tion

in ti

mes

of c

risis

and

in a

reas

mos

t affe

cted

by

disa

ster

2

2 2

- 1

IV.1

.3. S

cale

-up

mod

ern

food

stor

age

faci

litie

s for

impr

oved

Pub

lic F

ood

Dis

tribu

tion

Syst

em p

artic

ular

ly in

dis

aste

r-pr

one

area

s 23

5 23

5 47

18

8 -

IV.2

. Str

engt

hene

d ca

sh a

nd fo

od b

ased

pro

gram

mes

for

targ

eted

gro

ups a

cros

s the

life

cy

cle

incl

udin

g di

sabl

ed a

nd d

ispl

aced

pop

ulat

ions

84

6 79

2 37

0 42

2 54

IV.2

.1. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

safe

ty n

et p

rogr

amm

es a

cros

s the

life

cyc

le su

ppor

ting

vuln

erab

le g

roup

s suc

h as

poo

r wom

en, c

hild

ren,

the

elde

rly, d

isab

led

peop

le a

nd d

ispla

ced

popu

latio

ns

227

182

102

81

45

IV.2

.2. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

pro

gram

mes

for s

uppo

rting

peo

ple

livin

g in

vul

nera

ble

and

disa

dvan

tage

d ar

eas (

char

land

, riv

er b

ank,

hao

rs, h

ill tr

acts

and

urb

an a

reas

) 47

3 46

4 14

8 31

6 9

IV.2

.3. I

ntro

duce

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve so

cial

safe

ty n

et p

rogr

amm

es (S

SNP)

incl

udin

g fo

od

forti

ficat

ion

espe

cial

ly fo

r mot

hers

and

chi

ldre

n 14

5 14

5 12

0 26

0


C

IP2

Exi

stin

g re

sour

ces

(e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s + g

ap)

Tot

al

GoB

D

Ps

Fina

ncin

g ga

p V

. Str

engt

hene

d en

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t and

cro

ss-c

uttin

g pr

ogra

mm

es fo

r ac

hiev

ing

food

an

d nu

triti

on se

curi

ty

227

137

17

120

90

V.1

. Im

prov

ed fo

od sa

fety

, qua

lity

cont

rol a

nd a

ssur

ance

, aw

aren

ess o

n fo

od sa

fety

and

hy

gien

e 83

12

10

2

71

V.1

.1. E

nsur

e co

nfor

mity

of f

oods

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

thro

ugh

accr

edita

tion

from

ce

rtific

atio

n ag

enci

es, i

nspe

ctio

n an

d la

bora

tory

serv

ices

28

1

0 1

27

V.1

.2. I

ntro

duce

and

pop

ular

ise

Goo

d A

gric

ultu

ral P

ract

ices

, Goo

d A

quac

ultu

ral P

ract

ices

an

d G

ood

Hus

band

ry P

ract

ices

that

ens

ure

food

safe

ty a

nd q

ualit

y 21

11

10

1

11

V.1

.3. I

ntro

duce

and

scal

e-up

goo

d m

anuf

actu

ring

prac

tices

(GM

P) a

nd g

ood

hygi

enic

pr

actic

es (G

HP)

incl

udin

g ad

here

nce

to H

azar

d A

naly

sis a

nd C

ritic

al C

ontro

l Poi

nts (

HA

CC

P)

com

plia

nce

20

- -

- 20

V.1

.4. E

nhan

ce fo

od sa

fety

edu

catio

n, c

onsu

mer

aw

aren

ess a

nd fo

od sa

fety

net

wor

ks

14

- -

- 14

V

.2. R

educ

ed fo

od lo

sses

and

was

te

- -

- -

- V

.2.1

. Im

prov

e m

etho

ds o

f mea

surin

g fo

od lo

sses

and

impl

emen

t app

ropr

iate

mea

sure

s to

min

imis

e fo

od lo

sses

at f

arm

leve

l -

- -

- -

V.2

.2. S

treng

then

cap

acity

in p

ost-h

arve

st h

andl

ing

tech

nolo

gy a

nd in

frast

ruct

ure

(tran

spor

t, pa

ckag

ing,

stor

age)

-

- -

- -

V.2

.3. R

educ

e w

asta

ge a

nd q

ualit

y/qu

antit

y lo

ss o

f foo

d pr

oduc

ts a

t all

stag

es o

f m

arke

ting

and

cons

umpt

ion

- -

- -

-

V.3

. Im

prov

ed in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta fo

r ev

iden

ce-b

ased

mon

itori

ng a

nd a

djus

tmen

t of

polic

ies a

nd p

rogr

amm

es

47

45

6 40

1

V.3

.1. P

rodu

ce m

ore

relia

ble

and

timel

y FN

S in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta th

roug

h im

prov

ed

info

rmat

ion

infra

stru

ctur

es, e

nhan

ced

coor

dina

tion

in d

ata

colle

ctio

n an

d da

ta e

xcha

nge

to

impr

ove

evid

ence

-bas

ed d

ecis

ion

mak

ing,

pol

icy

form

ulat

ion

and

prog

ram

min

g 47

45

6

40

1

V.4

. Im

prov

ed F

NS

gove

rnan

ce, c

apac

ity st

reng

then

ing

and

lead

ersh

ip a

cros

s FN

S re

leva

nt st

akeh

olde

rs

98

80

1 79

18

V.4

.1. S

treng

then

exi

stin

g na

tiona

l coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

s lia

isin

g w

ith e

xist

ing

FNS

fram

ewor

ks, c

lust

ers a

nd n

etw

orks

incl

udin

g th

e SU

N in

itiat

ive

and

netw

orks

wor

king

tow

ards

in

tegr

atin

g th

e R

ight

to F

ood

to th

e C

onsti

tutio

n 0

- -

- 0

V.4

.2. S

treng

then

cap

aciti

es to

des

ign

and

mon

itor t

he n

ew F

ood

and

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y Po

licy

and

impl

emen

t, m

onito

r and

coo

rdin

ate

the

CIP

2 98

80

1

79

18

Gra

nd T

otal

9,

251

5,62

2 3,

443

2,17

9 3,

629


Tab

le A

5.3.

Exi

stin

g fin

anci

ng a

nd a

dditi

onal

req

uire

men

ts p

er p

rogr

amm

e an

d su

b-pr

ogra

mm

e, w

eigh

ted

by n

utri

tiona

l im

pact

(in

mill

ion

US$

)

T

otal

CIP

2 (e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s + g

ap)

Tot

al e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s

Fin

anci

ng g

ap

Tot

al

GoB

D

Ps

I. D

iver

sifie

d an

d su

stai

nabl

e ag

ricu

lture

, fis

heri

es a

nd li

vest

ock

for

heal

thy

diet

s 2,

657

1,03

0 81

8 21

2 1,

627

I.1. S

usta

inab

le in

tens

ifica

tion

and

dive

rsifi

catio

n of

cro

p-ba

sed

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

s 46

7 13

8 11

1 27

32

9 I.1

.1. E

nhan

ce a

gric

ultu

ral r

esea

rch

and

know

ledg

e, a

nd te

chno

logy

dev

elop

men

t for

mor

e pr

oduc

tive,

div

erse

, sus

tain

able

and

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve a

gric

ultu

re

185

56

49

7 12

9

I.1.2

. Dev

elop

tech

nolo

gies

incl

udin

g bi

otec

hnol

ogie

s and

mea

sure

s to

adap

t agr

icul

tura

l sys

tem

s to

clim

ate

chan

ge

122

16

6 10

10

6

I.1.3

. Im

prov

e an

d ex

pand

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve e

xten

sion

pro

gram

mes

and

agr

icul

tura

l adv

isor

y se

rvic

es

159

66

56

10

93

I.2. I

mpr

oved

acc

ess,

qual

ity a

nd m

anag

emen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral i

nput

s, in

clud

ing

wat

er

and

land

1,

601

673

507

165

929

I.2.1

. Enh

ance

ava

ilabi

lity

and

effic

ient

use

of a

fford

able

and

qua

lity

inpu

ts (s

eeds

, fer

tilis

ers,

pest

icid

es) a

nd c

redi

t for

safe

and

div

ersi

fied

crop

s 94

5 14

6 13

0 16

79

9

I.2.2

. Pre

serv

e ag

ricul

tura

l lan

d fe

rtilit

y an

d es

tabl

ish

land

righ

ts o

f mos

t vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns

0 0

0 -

- I.2

.3. I

mpr

ove

wat

er m

anag

emen

t thr

ough

con

serv

atio

n, su

stai

nabl

e ex

tract

ion

and

dist

ribut

ion

of

grou

nd w

ater

and

effi

cien

t use

of s

urfa

ce w

ater

for i

rrig

atio

n 62

4 49

5 34

5 14

9 12

9

I.2.4

. Miti

gate

the

effe

cts o

f sal

ine

wat

er in

trusi

on a

nd it

s im

pact

on

food

pro

duct

ion

and

impl

icat

ions

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

32

32

32

- -

I.3. E

nhan

ced

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd su

stai

nabl

e pr

oduc

tion

of a

nim

al so

urce

food

s

589

219

200

20

370

I.3.1

. Im

prov

e m

anag

emen

t of f

ishe

ries,

lives

tock

and

pou

ltry

to in

crea

se p

rodu

ctio

n an

d pr

oduc

tivity

and

nut

ritio

nal v

alue

whi

le e

nsur

ing

sust

aina

bilit

y 17

9 11

0 97

12

70

I.3.2

. Sus

tain

mic

ronu

trien

t-ric

h an

imal

food

pro

duct

ion

thro

ugh

cons

ervi

ng fi

sher

ies a

nd

lives

tock

bio

dive

rsity

96

68

68

-

28

I.3.3

. Stre

ngth

en su

stai

nabl

e sh

rimp

aqua

cultu

re, m

arin

e fis

herie

s and

farm

ing

syst

ems a

dapt

ed to

ge

ogra

phic

al z

ones

18

4 16

9

7 16

8

I.3.4

. Im

prov

e fis

herie

s, liv

esto

ck a

nd p

oultr

y he

alth

serv

ices

, qua

lity

inpu

ts a

nd su

rvei

llanc

e

130

26

26

0 10

4 II

. Eff

icie

nt a

nd n

utri

tion-

sens

itive

pos

t-ha

rves

t tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

and

valu

e ad

ditio

n

1,58

6 96

3 73

3 23

0 62

3 II

.1. S

tren

gthe

ned

post

-har

vest

val

ue c

hain

with

par

ticul

ar fo

cus o

n M

SME

s (st

orag

e,

proc

essi

ng, b

rand

ing,

labe

lling

, mar

ketin

g an

d tr

ade)

21

9 27

19

8

192

II.1

.1.

Dev

elop

skill

s and

stre

ngth

en c

apac

ity to

pro

cess

and

supp

ly sa

fe a

nd n

utrie

nt-r

ich

food

s w

ith e

mph

asis

on

qual

ity st

anda

rds a

nd n

utrie

nt la

belli

ng in

form

atio

n

24

4 0

4 20

II.1

.2. A

dopt

app

ropr

iate

tech

nolo

gy a

nd st

reng

then

infra

stru

ctur

e to

allo

w q

ualit

y im

prov

emen

t, va

lue

addi

tion

and

forti

ficat

ion

of fo

ods

143

7 7

- 13

6

II.1

.3. M

obili

se a

nd p

rom

ote

prod

ucer

and

mar

ketin

g gr

oups

for i

mpr

oved

mar

ket a

cces

s and

ba

rgai

ning

pow

er, e

spec

ially

for w

omen

and

smal

lhol

ders

51

16

12

4

35

II.2

. Im

prov

ed a

cces

s to

mar

kets

, fac

ilitie

s and

info

rmat

ion

1,36

8 93

6 71

4 22

2 43

2 II

.2.1

. Im

prov

e m

arke

t inf

rast

ruct

ures

, phy

sica

l acc

ess t

o m

arke

t fac

ilitie

s

1,32

0 93

4 71

4 22

0 38

6 II

.2.2

. Stre

ngth

en p

rivat

e se

ctor

par

ticip

atio

n an

d pr

ivat

e-pu

blic

par

tner

ship

s 43

-

- -

43

II.2

.3. S

cale

-up

info

rmat

ion

diss

emin

atio

n in

clud

ing

the

esta

blish

men

t of I

CT

faci

litie

s 5

2 0

2 3


T

otal

CIP

2 (e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s + g

ap)

Tot

al e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s T

otal

GoB

D

Ps

Fin

anci

ng g

ap

III.

Impr

oved

die

tary

div

ersi

ty, c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n 17

4 13

1 89

42

43

II

I.1. E

nhan

ced

nutr

ition

kno

wle

dge,

pro

mot

ion

of g

ood

prac

tices

, and

con

sum

ptio

n of

safe

an

d nu

triti

ous d

iets

69

27

6

20

43

III.1

.1 S

cale

up

nutri

tion

train

ing,

beh

avio

ur c

hang

e co

mm

unic

atio

ns (B

CC

) for

enh

ance

d kn

owle

dge,

safe

stor

age,

hou

seho

ld p

roce

ssin

g an

d im

prov

ed c

onsu

mpt

ion

29

3

1 1

26

III.1

.2. P

reve

nt a

nd c

ontro

l non

-com

mun

icab

le d

isea

ses (

NC

Ds)

and

ens

ure

heal

thy

diet

s th

roug

h pr

omot

ion

of d

ieta

ry g

uide

lines

link

ed w

ith n

atio

nal N

CD

stra

tegi

es a

nd re

late

d nu

tritio

n se

rvic

es

24

24

5 19

0

III.1

.3. K

now

ledg

e ba

sed

tool

s and

rese

arch

on

the

deve

lopm

ent a

nd p

rom

otio

n of

nut

rient

de

nse

reci

pes u

sing

loca

l foo

ds fo

r enh

anci

ng d

iver

sifie

d fo

od c

onsu

mpt

ion

to re

duce

stun

ting,

w

astin

g an

d m

icro

nutri

ent d

efic

ienc

ies

16

- -

- 16

III.2

. Opt

imis

ed fo

od u

tilis

atio

n th

roug

h pr

ovis

ion

of sa

fe w

ater

, im

prov

ed fo

od h

ygie

ne a

nd

sani

tatio

n

104

104

82

22

0

III.2

.1. S

cale

up

the

supp

ly o

f saf

e w

ater

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

dom

estic

use

99

99

82

17

0

III.2

.2. E

nsur

e hy

gien

ic fo

od h

andl

ing,

pre

para

tion

and

serv

ices

, and

scal

e-up

han

d w

ashi

ng

beha

viou

r 1

1 0

1 0

III.2

.3. I

mpr

ove

sani

tary

faci

litie

s and

pra

ctic

es -i

nclu

ding

the

prev

entio

n of

ani

mal

cro

ss-

cont

amin

atio

n- fo

r red

ucin

g di

arrh

eal a

nd fo

od b

orne

illn

ess a

nd c

hild

und

ernu

tritio

n

5 5

1 4

-

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n an

d sa

fety

net

s and

incr

ease

d re

silie

nce

1,07

6 1,

035

266

769

41

IV.1

. Tim

ely

and

effe

ctiv

e di

sast

er p

repa

redn

ess a

nd r

espo

nses

thro

ugh

emer

genc

y fo

od

dist

ribu

tion,

step

s tow

ards

agr

icul

tura

l sec

tor

reha

bilit

atio

n an

d m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s 54

5 54

4 92

45

2 1

IV.1

.1. I

ncre

ase

the

resi

lienc

e of

agr

icul

tura

l sys

tem

s, in

clud

ing

the

prod

uctio

n of

dis

aste

r-re

silie

nt n

utrit

ious

cro

ps e

spec

ially

by

vuln

erab

le p

opul

atio

ns

367

367

55

312

0

IV.1

.2. E

nsur

e so

cial

and

eco

nom

ic a

cces

s to

food

for t

he p

oore

st se

ctio

ns o

f the

pop

ulat

ion

in

times

of c

risis

and

in a

reas

mos

t affe

cted

by

disa

ster

2

1 1

- 1

IV.1

.3. S

cale

-up

mod

ern

food

stor

age

faci

litie

s for

impr

oved

Pub

lic F

ood

Dis

tribu

tion

Syst

em

parti

cula

rly in

dis

aste

r-pr

one

area

s 17

6 17

6 35

14

1 -

IV.2

. Str

engt

hene

d ca

sh a

nd fo

od-b

ased

pro

gram

mes

for

targ

eted

gro

ups a

cros

s the

life

cyc

le

incl

udin

g di

sabl

ed a

nd d

ispl

aced

pop

ulat

ions

53

1 49

0 17

4 31

7 41

IV.2

.1. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

safe

ty n

et p

rogr

amm

es a

cros

s the

life

cyc

le su

ppor

ting

vuln

erab

le

grou

ps su

ch a

s poo

r wom

en, c

hild

ren,

the

elde

rly, d

isab

led

peop

le a

nd d

ispl

aced

pop

ulat

ions

15

8 12

4 64

61

34

IV.2

.2. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

pro

gram

mes

for s

uppo

rting

peo

ple

livin

g in

vul

nera

ble

and

disa

dvan

tage

d ar

eas (

char

land

, riv

er b

ank,

hao

rs, h

ill tr

acts

and

urb

an a

reas

) 26

6 25

9 22

23

7 7

IV.2

.3. I

ntro

duce

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve so

cial

safe

ty n

et p

rogr

amm

es (S

SNP)

incl

udin

g fo

od

forti

ficat

ion

espe

cial

ly fo

r mot

hers

and

chi

ldre

n 10

7 10

7 88

19

0


T

otal

CIP

2 (e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s + g

ap)

Tot

al e

xist

ing

reso

urce

s T

otal

GoB

D

Ps

Fin

anci

ng g

ap

V. S

tren

gthe

ned

enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent a

nd c

ross

-cut

ting

prog

ram

mes

for

achi

evin

g fo

od a

nd

nutr

ition

secu

rity

13

4 72

11

61

63

V.1

. Im

prov

ed fo

od sa

fety

, qua

lity

cont

rol a

nd a

ssur

ance

, aw

aren

ess o

n fo

od sa

fety

and

hy

gien

e 62

9

7 2

53

V.1

.1. E

nsur

e co

nfor

mity

of f

oods

for c

onsu

mpt

ion

thro

ugh

accr

edita

tion

from

cer

tific

atio

n ag

enci

es, i

nspe

ctio

n an

d la

bora

tory

serv

ices

21

1

0 1

20

V.1

.2. I

ntro

duce

and

pop

ular

ise

Goo

d A

gric

ultu

ral P

ract

ices

, Goo

d A

quac

ultu

ral P

ract

ices

and

G

ood

Hus

band

ry P

ract

ices

that

ens

ure

food

safe

ty a

nd q

ualit

y 16

8

7 1

8

V.1

.3. I

ntro

duce

and

scal

e-up

goo

d m

anuf

actu

ring

prac

tices

(GM

P) a

nd g

ood

hygi

enic

pra

ctic

es

(GH

P) in

clud

ing

adhe

renc

e to

Haz

ard

Ana

lysi

s and

Crit

ical

Con

trol P

oint

s (H

AC

CP)

com

plia

nce

15

- -

- 15

V.1

.4. E

nhan

ce fo

od sa

fety

edu

catio

n, c

onsu

mer

aw

aren

ess a

nd fo

od sa

fety

net

wor

ks

10

- -

- 10

V

.2. R

educ

ed fo

od lo

sses

and

was

te

- -

- -

- V

.2.1

. Im

prov

e m

etho

ds o

f mea

surin

g fo

od lo

sses

and

impl

emen

t app

ropr

iate

mea

sure

s to

min

imis

e fo

od lo

sses

at f

arm

leve

l -

- -

- -

V.2

.2. S

treng

then

cap

acity

in p

ost-h

arve

st h

andl

ing

tech

nolo

gy a

nd in

frast

ruct

ure

(tran

spor

t, pa

ckag

ing,

stor

age)

-

- -

- -

V.2

.3. R

educ

e w

asta

ge a

nd q

ualit

y/qu

antit

y lo

ss o

f foo

d pr

oduc

ts a

t all

stag

es o

f mar

ketin

g an

d co

nsum

ptio

n -

- -

- -

V.3

. Im

prov

ed in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta fo

r ev

iden

ce-b

ased

mon

itori

ng a

nd a

djus

tmen

t of

polic

ies a

nd p

rogr

amm

es

23

23

3 20

1

V.3

.1. P

rodu

ce m

ore

relia

ble

and

timel

y FN

S in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta th

roug

h im

prov

ed

info

rmat

ion

infra

stru

ctur

es, e

nhan

ced

coor

dina

tion

in d

ata

colle

ctio

n an

d da

ta e

xcha

nge

to im

prov

e ev

iden

ce-b

ased

dec

isio

n m

akin

g, p

olic

y fo

rmul

atio

n an

d pr

ogra

mm

ing

23

23

3 20

1

V.4

. Im

prov

ed F

NS

gove

rnan

ce, c

apac

ity st

reng

then

ing

and

lead

ersh

ip a

cros

s FN

S re

leva

nt

stak

ehol

ders

49

40

1

39

9

V.4

.1. S

treng

then

exi

stin

g na

tiona

l coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

s lia

isin

g w

ith e

xist

ing

FNS

fram

ewor

ks, c

lust

ers a

nd n

etw

orks

incl

udin

g th

e SU

N in

itiat

ive

and

netw

orks

wor

king

tow

ards

in

tegr

atin

g th

e R

ight

to F

ood

to th

e C

onsti

tutio

n 0

- -

- 0

V.4

.2. S

treng

then

cap

aciti

es to

des

ign

and

mon

itor t

he n

ew F

ood

and

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y Po

licy

and

impl

emen

t, m

onito

r and

coo

rdin

ate

the

CIP

2 49

40

1

39

9

Gra

nd T

otal

5,

627

3,22

9 1,

915

1,31

4 2,

398


3%

19%

3%

47%

28%

V. S

treng

then

ed e

nabl

ing

envi

ronm

ent a

nd c

ross

-cu

tting

pro

gram

mes

for a

chie

ving

food

and

nut

ritio

nse

curit

y

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n an

d sa

fety

nets

and

incr

ease

d re

silie

nce

III.

Impr

oved

die

tary

div

ersi

ty,

cons

umpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n

II. E

ffici

ent a

nd n

utrit

ion-

sens

itive

pos

t-ha

rves

t tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

and

valu

e ad

ditio

n

I. D

iver

sifie

d an

d su

stai

nabl

eag

ricul

ture

, fis

herie

s and

live

stoc

kfo

r hea

lthy

diet

s

Figu

re A

5.2.

Bud

get s

hare

s of e

ach

pilla

r in

the

tota

l CIP

2 af

ter

nutr

ition

wei

ghtin

g

3%

19%

3%

47%

28%



V.2.

Kno

wle

dge s

harin

g on

clim

ate c

hang

e ada

ptat

ion,

60.

8

S. M

arke

ting,

47.

4

Q.3

. Rur

al el

ectri

city,

67.

3

U. C

lean

wat

er, s

anita

tion

and

heal

th, 3

4.1

Q.1

. Rur

al ro

ads,

brid

ges a

nd cu

lver

ts, 8

36.9

Oth

er ca

tego

ries r

epre

sent

ing

belo

w 1

% o

f the

tota

l,70

2.0

O.5

. Oth

er m

easu

res i

n su

ppor

t to

food

safe

ty an

dqu

ality

, 341

.9

O.4

. Ins

pect

ion

of ag

ricul

tura

l inp

uts,

602.

9

O.1

. Vet

erin

ary

and

plan

t ins

pect

ion,

321

.5

Not

clas

sifie

d, 9

8.7

G.2

. Mic

ronu

trien

t and

dew

orm

ing

inte

rven

tions

,16

1.3

F.3.

In-k

ind

trans

fers

, 1,2

95.2

E.1.

Em

ploy

men

t pro

gram

mes

, 37.

5

B.3.

On-

farm

serv

ices (

pest

and

dise

ase

cont

rol/v

eterin

ary

serv

ices,

on-fa

rm tr

ainin

g,tec

hnica

l ass

istan

ce, e

xten

sion

etc.,

othe

r), 2

47.2

B.1.

Var

iable

inpu

ts (se

eds,

ferti

llise

r, en

ergy

, cre

dit,

othe

r), 2

36.4

Adm

inist

rativ

e cos

ts, 1

60.0

1.1.

4. P

aym

ents

to p

roce

ssor

s, 16

6.9

1.1.

3. P

aym

ents

to su

pplie

rs,15

8.97

V.6.

Oth

er su

ppor

t to

wea

ther

var

iabi

llity

and

clim

ate c

hang

em

itiga

tion,

50.

2

Figu

re A

.5.3

. Nut

ritio

n-w

eigh

ted

CIP

2 bu

dget

acc

ordi

ng to

the

MA

FAP

clas

sific

atio

n in

US$

mill

ion

Tab

le A

5.4.

Nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve +

, nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve a

nd n

utri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e in

terv

entio

ns in

the

CIP

2 (in

mill

ion

US$

)

CIP

2 Pr

ogra

mm

es b

y pi

llar

nutr

ition

sens

itive

nu

triti

on se

nsiti

ve +

nu

triti

on su

ppor

tive

Gra

nd T

otal

I. D

iver

sifie

d an

d su

stai

nabl

e ag

ricu

lture

, fis

heri

es a

nd li

vest

ock

for

heal

thy

diet

s 3,

117

- 69

8 3,

815

I.1. S

usta

inab

le in

tens

ifica

tion

and

dive

rsifi

catio

n of

cro

p-ba

sed

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

s 62

2 -

- 62

2

I.2. I

mpr

oved

acc

ess,

qual

ity a

nd m

anag

emen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral i

nput

s, in

clud

ing

wat

er a

nd la

nd

1,72

2 -

679

2,40

1

I.3. E

nhan

ced

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd su

stai

nabl

e pr

oduc

tion

of a

nim

al so

urce

food

s

774

- 18

79

2 II

. Eff

icie

nt a

nd n

utri

tion-

sens

itive

pos

t-ha

rves

t tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

and

valu

e ad

ditio

n

-

3,17

2 3,

172

II.1

. Stre

ngth

ened

pos

t-har

vest

val

ue c

hain

with

par

ticul

ar fo

cus o

n M

SMEs

(s

tora

ge, p

roce

ssin

g, b

rand

ing,

labe

lling

, mar

ketin

g an

d tra

de)

- -

437

437

II.2

. Im

prov

ed a

cces

s to

mar

kets

, fac

ilitie

s and

info

rmat

ion

- -

2,73

5 2,

735

III.

Impr

oved

die

tary

div

ersi

ty, c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n 21

8 10

-

228

III.1

. Enh

ance

d nu

tritio

n kn

owle

dge,

pro

mot

ion

of g

ood

prac

tices

, and

co

nsum

ptio

n of

safe

and

nut

ritio

us d

iets

79

10

-

89

III.2

. Opt

imis

ed fo

od u

tilis

atio

n th

roug

h pr

ovis

ion

of sa

fe w

ater

, im

prov

ed

food

hyg

iene

and

sani

tatio

n

139

- -

139

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n an

d sa

fety

net

s and

incr

ease

d re

silie

nce

1,12

2 -

686

1,80

8

IV.1

. Tim

ely

and

effe

ctiv

e di

sast

er p

repa

redn

ess a

nd re

spon

ses t

hrou

gh

emer

genc

y fo

od d

istri

butio

n, st

eps t

owar

ds a

gric

ultu

ral s

ecto

r reh

abili

tatio

n an

d m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s 27

6 -

686

962

IV.2

. Stre

ngth

ened

cas

h an

d fo

od-b

ased

pro

gram

mes

for t

arge

ted

grou

ps

acro

ss th

e lif

e cy

cle

incl

udin

g di

sabl

ed a

nd d

ispl

aced

pop

ulat

ions

84

6 -

84

6

V. S

tren

gthe

ned

enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent a

nd c

ross

-cut

ting

prog

ram

mes

for

achi

evin

g fo

od a

nd n

utri

tion

secu

rity

83

-

145

227

V.1

. Im

prov

ed fo

od sa

fety

, qua

lity

cont

rol a

nd a

ssur

ance

, aw

aren

ess o

n fo

od

safe

ty a

nd h

ygie

ne

83

- -

83

V.2

. Red

uced

food

loss

es a

nd w

aste

-

- -

- V

.3. I

mpr

oved

info

rmat

ion

and

data

for e

vide

nce-

base

d m

onito

ring

and

adju

stm

ent o

f pol

icie

s and

pro

gram

mes

-

- 47

47

V.4

. Im

prov

ed F

NS

gove

rnan

ce, c

apac

ity st

reng

then

ing

and

lead

ersh

ip a

cros

s FN

S re

leva

nt st

akeh

olde

rs

- -

98

98

Gra

nd T

otal

4,

540.

1 10

.1

4,70

0.5

9,25

0.7


Note on Tables A5.5. and A5.6

These tables are an inventory of all the projects recorded as ongoing in June 2016 and those identified as in the pipeline. The CIP2 implementation period was taken as a reference.

For ongoing projects, what is indicated is the fund allocated for the duration of the CIP2. This means that the project may have started earlier than June 2016 and that part of the total budget has already been spent. It is the residual budget that is counted in the CIP2 i.e. the funds available for the life of the CIP2.

The column ‘Portion of the project budget allocated under this sub-programme’ refers to the fact that, as explained earlier, one project can have components that belong under several CIP2 sub-programmes. It will therefore appear more than once in the inventory, but the total of this column for one particular project across the CIP2 will not exceed 100%.

There may also be cases where this total figure is less than 100% for one particular project, because it has been considered that not all the components of this project are relevant to the CIP2. This also applies to pipeline projects.


Tab

le A

5.5.

Dat

abas

e of

ong

oing

pro

ject

s rel

evan

t to

CIP

2 (f

unds

in la

khs t

aka)

Not

es:

- Pro

gram

mes

and

sub

-pro

gram

mes

with

no

curr

ently

ong

oing

pro

ject

s ar

e no

t lis

ted

in th

e ta

ble

belo

w.

- Unl

ike

the

sum

mar

y ta

bles

sho

wn

in th

e C

IP2,

the

amou

nts

prov

ided

in th

is d

atab

ase

are

show

n in

lakh

taka

whi

ch is

the

curr

ency

use

d in

off

icia

l GoB

do

cum

ents

.

Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

I.1

. Sus

tain

able

inte

nsifi

catio

n an

d di

vers

ifica

tion

of c

rop-

base

d pr

oduc

tion

syst

ems

144,

280

115,

555

28,7

25

I.1.1

. Enh

ance

agr

icul

tura

l res

earc

h an

d kn

owle

dge,

and

tech

nolo

gy d

evel

opm

ent f

or m

ore

prod

uctiv

e, d

iver

se, s

usta

inab

le a

nd n

utri

tion-

sens

itive

agr

icul

ture

58,1

82

51,1

39

7,04

3

BA

RI

evi ti snes -n oitirtu n -

455,6 45 5, 6

%00 1

IR

AB fo erutcur tsarf ni hc raese

R dna hcr aeseR eht g ni vorp

mI e v itis nes -no it irtun

- 7

7

%05 t cejor P tne

m pole veD laru tlu cirg

A d etar get nI r ag anbi j uM

e vitisnes -noitirtun -

04 3,2 043,2

%001

hs edalg naB ni tne

m polev ed d na h cra eser d ee sl io fo gnin eh tg ner tS evitisne s-noitir tun

- 324

3 24

%001 )trap I

RA

B( tc ejor P t nempole ve

D sur tiC B

RR

IIn

tegr

ated

Agr

icul

ture

Pro

duct

ivity

Pro

ject

(IA

PP)

100%

20

-

20

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Pe

rojp

ur-G

oplg

anj-B

ager

hat I

nteg

rat e

d A

gric

ultu

re D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct

40%

85

85

-

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

B

SRI

Stre

ngth

enin

g of

Inte

grat

ed R

esea

rch

prog

ram

of B

angl

ades

h Su

garc

ane

Res

earc

h In

stitu

te

100%

5,

890

5,89

0 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

C

HT

DB

Mix

ed F

ruit

Cul

tivat

ion

in re

mot

e ar

eas o

f Chi

ttago

ng H

ill T

ract

s 10

0%

3,58

4 3,

584

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DA

E

Inte

grat

ed F

arm

Man

agem

ent,

Agr

icul

tura

l Pro

duct

ion

and

Empl

oym

ent P

rogr

amm

e 33

%

9,55

3 2,

799

6,75

4 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve evitisnes-noitirtun

862 432

205

%71 tce jorP no itaci fis revi

D sporC dn oceS Y

ear-

Rou

nd F

ruit

Prod

uctio

n fo

r Nut

r5,61

%001

tcejorP tnemevorp

mI noiti25

16

,525

-

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

N

AT

ASt

reng

then

ing

the

Nat

iona

l Agr

icul

ture

Tra

inin

g A

cade

my

100%

4,

674

4,67

4 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

R

DC

D

evitisne s-n oitirtun -

420,5 420,5

%05

ru pgn aR ta )

AD

R( ymed ac

A t nemp oleve

D l aruR fo tne

mhs ilbatsE Act

ion

rese

arch

pro

ject

on

exte

nsio

n an

d di

ssem

inat

ion

of m

oder

n w

ater

savi

ng te

chno

logi

es a

nd

man

agem

ent p

ract

ices

to in

crea

se c

rop

prod

uctio

n 10

0%

3,00

0 3,

000

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

I.1.2

. Dev

elop

tech

nolo

gies

incl

udin

g bi

otec

hnol

ogie

s and

mea

sure

s to

adap

t agr

icul

tura

l sy

stem

s to

clim

ate

chan

ge

16,9

43

6,07

5 10

,868

DoF

ores

try

evitisnes-noitirtun 707,7

248 845,8

%001

)trap yrtseroFoD( )LE

RC( doohileviL dna

metsysocE tneiliseR eta

milC M

oAIn

tegr

ated

Agr

icul

ture

Pro

duct

ivity

Pro

ject

(IA

PP)

80%

3,

370

209

3,16

2 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By D

Ps

RD

CD

evitis nes -no itirtun

- 420,5

4 20,5

%05 r up gna

R ta )A

DR ( y

meda cA tne

mpoleveD l aru

R fo tnem hsilbat sE I.1

.3. I

mpr

ove

and

expa

nd n

utri

tion-

sens

itive

ext

ensi

on p

rogr

amm

es a

nd a

gric

ultu

ral

advi

sory

serv

ices

69,1

55

58,3

41

10,8

14

BA

DC

Stre

ngth

enin

g Su

stai

nabl

e N

utrit

ion

Secu

rity

thro

ugh

the

prod

uctio

n of

pul

ses a

nd o

ilsee

ds

20%

2,

670

2,67

0 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itiv e

BA

RI

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e M

ujib

naga

r Int

egra

ted

Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

25

%

44

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Piro

jpur

-Gop

algo

nj-B

aghe

rhat

Inte

grat

ed A

gric

ultu

re D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct (B

AR

I par

t) 10

0%

291

291

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

BIR

TA

N

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t and

Stre

ngth

enin

g of

Ban

glad

esh

Inst

itute

of R

esea

rch

and

Trai

ning

on

App

lied

Nut

ritio

n (B

IRTA

N)

100%

12

,163

12

,163

-

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

BR

RI

Pero

jpur

-Gop

lgan

j-Bag

erha

t Int

egra

t ed

Agr

icul

ture

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

40

%

85

85

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DA

E

Agr

icul

tura

l sup

port

for f

arm

ers i

n So

uthw

este

rn re

gion

of B

angl

ades

h (D

AE

Com

pone

nt)

100%

4,

655

1,25

6 3,

399

nutri

tion-

sens

itiv e

evitisnes-noitirtun -

750,1 750,1

%001

)t ne no pmo

C EA

D ( tcejorP tnempo le ve

D sur t iC C

onst

ruct

ion

of R

ubbe

r Dam

in S

mal

l & m

ediu

m R

iver

s in

orde

r to

Incr

ease

the

Food

Pr

oduc

tivity

(DA

E C

ompo

nent

) 10

0%

206

206

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti


- 808, 4

808,4

%001 tne

mpol eveD erutlucirg

A detargetnI yb ytiruceS noitir tuN dn a dooF e ru snE Es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f tw

o A

gric

ultu

ral T

rain

ing

Inst

it ute

s at B

anch

aram

pur U

pazi

la o

f Bra

hman

baria

D

istri

ct a

nd S

atur

ia U

pazi

la o

f Man

ikgo

nj D

istri

ct

100%

3,

559

3,55

9 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Farm

ers T

rain

ing

for T

rans

fer o

f Tec

hnol

ogy

at U

pazi

la le


550,1 550,1

%001

)esahP dn2( lev evitisnes-noitirtun

- 72 4,4

724,4

%001 )E

AD( noig e

R tehlyS ta yti snetnI g nipporC gnisa erc nI In

tegr

ated

Far

m M

anag

emen

t, A

gric

ultu

ral P

rodu

ctio

n an

d Em

ploy

men

t Pro

gram

me

33%

9,

553

2,79

9 6,

754

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

ev it isn es- noitir tun -

- -

%75

) EA

D( tnemp ole ve

D erut luc ir gA detarg et ni rag anb iju

M Piro

jpur

Gop

alga

nj B

ager

hat i

nteg

rate

d ag

ricul

tura

l dev

elop

men

t pro

ject

(DA

E C

ompo

nent

) 10

0%

1,29

1 1,

291

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Piro

jpur

Gop

alga

nj B

ager

hat i

nteg

rate

d ag

ricul

tura

l dev

elop

men

t pro

ject

(PC

U C

ompo

nent

) 10

0%

130

130

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Tran

sfer

of T

echn

olog

y fo

r Agr

icul

tura

l Pro

duct

ion

unde

r evitisnes-noitirtun

556 17

627

%001

margorP dloG eul

B evitisnes-noitirtun

5 682

192

%001 )t nenop

moC E

AD( )PP

AI( tcejorP yt ivitc udorP erutlucirgA detargetnI M

oAIn

tegr

ated

Agr

icul

ture

Pro

duct

ivity

Pro

ject

(IA

PP)

100%

-

--

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

R

DC

D

Expa

nsio

n, R

enov

atio

n an

d M

oder

niza

tion

of B

angl

ades

h Po

verty

Alle

viat

ion

Trai

ning

C

ompl

ex, K

otal

ipar

a, G

opal

gonj

10

0%

22,1

85

22,1

85

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

I.2. I

mpr

oved

acc

ess,

qual

ity a

nd m

anag

emen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral i

nput

s, in

clud

ing

wat

er

and

land

901,

791

703,

143

198,

648


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

I.2

.1. E

nhan

ce a

vaila

bilit

y an

d ef

ficie

nt u

se o

f aff

orda

ble

and

qual

ity in

puts

(see

ds,

fert

ilise

rs, p

estic

ides

) and

cre

dit f

or sa

fe a

nd d

iver

sifie

d cr

ops

16

7,78

8 14

6,70

9 21

,079

BA

DC

Dev

elop

men

t and

Mod

erni

zatio

n of

exi

stin

g se

ed p

rodu

ctio

n, p

roce

ssin

g an

d di

strib

utio

n ar

rang

emen

ts o

f BA

DC

10

0%

19,7

82

19,7

82

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Dev

elop

men

t, m

ultip

licat

ion

and

qual

ity a

sses

smen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral s

eeds

thro

ugh

bio-

tech

nolo

gy

and

diss

emin

atio

n of

the

tech

nolo

gy

100%

1,

652

1,65

2 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

evitisn es -noit ir tun 7 76 ,2

54 5 222, 3

%001

tc ejorp ylppu s de es yt ilauq gn icnah nE Esta

blis

hing

seed

aug

men

tatio

n (m

ultip

licat

ion)

farm

in th

e So

uth

Wes

t Coa

stal

regi

on

100%

6,

986

6,98

6 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Es

tabl

ishi

ng S

eed

Proc

essi

ng C

ente

r and

Enh

anci

ng S

eed

mul

tiplic

atio

n fa

rm a

t Sub

arna

char

in

Noa

khal

i 10

0%

1,03

2 1,

032

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Mai

nten

ance

and

reha

bilit

atio

n of

exi

stin

g fe

rtiliz

er st

orag

e an

d st

reng

then

ing

ferti

lizer

m

anag

emen

t 10

0%

7,85

4 7,

854

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti


- 164,82

164,82

%001 ezia

M dna taehW ,eci

R f o dees ytila uQ hgi

H f o tn empolev e

D dn a n oit cudorP evitisnes-noitirtun

- 604

604

%001 no ige

R tehlyS fo yti snetnI gnipporC g nisaercn I dna dnaL

wollaF gn isU ro f t ce jorP St

reng

then

ing

Sust

aina

ble

Nut

ritio

n Se

curit

y th

roug

h th

e pr

oduc

tion

of p

ulse

s and

oils

eeds

40

%

5,34

0 5,

340

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

veB

AR

IEn

hanc

ing

Qua

lity

Seed

Sup

ply

100%

46

5 0

465

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Im

prov

emen

t and

qua

lity

seed

pro

duct

ion

of ri

ce, w

heat

and

mai

ze (2

nd p

hase

) 10

0%

1,83

3 1,

833

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

BC

ICSh

ahja

lal f

ertil

izer

pro

ject

10

0%

11,5

11

8,45

9 3,

052

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

B

MD

AFa

rmer

trai

ning

pro

gram

s, su

pply

and

pro

duct

ion

of st

anda

rd se

ed fo

r cro

p pr

oduc

tion

100%

65

7 65

7 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

B

RR

I eviti snes -noitir tu n

183 0

283

%001 )I

RR

B( ylppuS deeS ytil auQ g ni cna hnE C

HT

DB

Chi

ttago

ng H

ill T

ract

s Rur

al D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct (2

nd P

hase

) PM

U C

ompo

nent

10

0%

16,5

53

3,50

9 13

,043

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

DA

E

eviti snes-noitirtun -

121,51 121,51

%001

) 2- esah P( n oita zinahceM

mra F hguor ht noitc udorP s porC fo tn e

mec na hnE eviti sn es- noitirtun

- -

-

%3 4 ) E

AD( t ne

mp oleveD e ru tluc irg

A detar getni r aga nbijuM Pr

oduc

tion

Stor

age

and

dist

ribut

ion

of q

ualit

y se

eds o

f ric

e, w

heat

and

jute

at f

arm

er's

leve

l pr

ojec

t (ph

ase

2)

100%

76

7 76

7 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Prod

uctio

n, p

rese

rvat

ion,

Dis

tribu

tion

of Q

ualit

y Se

eds o

f Pul

se, O

il, a

nd O

nion

at F

arm

ers

Leve

l (Ph

ase-

2)

100%

2,

963

2,96

3 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Prod

uctio

n, S

tora

ge a

nd D

istri

butio

n of

Qua

lity

seed

s of R

ice,

Whe

at a

nd Ju

te a

t Far

mer

s Lev

el

(Pha

se-2

)10

0%

6,90

3 6,

903

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

481,1 130,1

512,2

%57 tcejo rP noitacifisrevi

D sporC dnoceS

nutri

tion-

sens

itive


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

L

GE

D

Rur

al in

fras

truct

ure

deve

lopm

ent p

roje

ct: G

reat

er D

haka

, Tan

gail

and

Kis

horg

anj D

istri

ct

100%

30

,222

30

,222

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e SC

A

e vitisne s- noiti rt un 77 2

4 12 1 94

%00 1

) PPA I( tcejorP ytivitcu dorP erutluci rg

A det ar get nI SFD

F Sm

all F

arm

ers D

evel

opm

ent F

ound

atio

n A

ssis

tanc

e pr

ojec

t (2n

d Ph

ase)

50

%

2,97

1 2,

971

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

I.2.2

. Pre

serv

e ag

ricu

ltura

l lan

d fe

rtili

ty a

nd e

stab

lish

land

rig

hts o

f mos

t vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns

31,2

39

31,2

39

-

PMO

A

sray

an P

roje

ct-2

25

%

31,0

96

31,0

96

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

SRD

IIn

tegr

ated

Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t pro

ject

in P

irojp

ur, G

opal

gonj

, Bag

erha

t (IA

DP-

PGB

) SR

DI p

art

50%

14

3 14

3 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

I.2.3

. Im

prov

e w

ater

man

agem

ent t

hrou

gh c

onse

rvat

ion,

sust

aina

ble

extr

actio

n an

d

noit ag ir ri r of r etaw ecafru s fo e su t neiciff e dna r eta

w d nu or g fo noit ubir ts id65

2,20

7 47

4,63

8 17

7,56

9

BA

DC

e vitisn es -noitir tu n -

321,21 32 1,21

%001

n oit agirrI rof sll ew ebu T p ee

D el bareponI gnitavitcA A

shug

anj P

alas

h A

gro-

Irrig

atio

n (5

th st

age)

10

0%

1,83

0 1,

830

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve evitisnes-no itirtun

- 231,8

23 1,8

%001 tc ejorP t ne

mpo le veD n oita gi rr I r oni

M no isiviD las ira

B Con

stru

ctio

n of

Rub

ber D

ams i

n Sm

all &

med

ium

Riv

er fo

r Inc

reas

ing

Food

Pro

duct

ion

100%

45

2 45

2 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e C

onst

ruct

ion

of ru

bber

dam

s to

incr

ease

the

use

of w

ater

for a

gric

ultu

re p

rodu

ctio

n on

Ear

th

Surf

ace

100%

16

,910

16

,910

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e evitis nes-noitirtun -

949,1 949,1

%001

tc ejorP tnem pole ve

D aerA detagirrI deta rget nI n retsaE Ex

pans

ion

of ir

rigat

ion

thro

ugh

utili

zatio

n of

surf

ace

wat

er b

y do

uble

lifti

ng (3

rd p

hase

) 10

0%

10,2

76

10,2

76

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti


- 450,5

450,5

%001 t cej orP tne

mpole veD larutlucirg

A detarg etn I r aganbijuM Pa

bna-

Nat

ore-

Sira

jgan

g Ir

rigat

ion

Are

a D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct

,3 442,3

%001

) esahP dr3(24

4 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

ev itr op pu s-noit ir tun -

4 44,6 444 ,6

%001

tc ejorP tnemp ol eve

D la rutluc irgA d etarg etnI t ahr ega

B- jnog lapoG -ru pjoriP Pr

ojec

t for

irrig

atio

n ex

pans

ion

in p

over

ty p

rone

are

as u

nder

Gre

ater

Ran

gpur

dis

trict

thro

ugh

mod

ern

min

or ir

rigat

ion

prac

tices

10

0%

681

681

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Stre

ngth

enin

g Su

stai

nabl

e N

utrit

ion

Secu

rity

thro

ugh

the

prod

uctio

n of

pul

ses a

nd o

ilsee

ds

40%

5,

340

5,34

0 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

evit isn es- noitirtun -

782,8 7 82,8

%00 1

tcejorP tn empo lev e

D n oitagirr I ro n iM noi siv i

D t eh lyS Inte

grat

ed A

gric

ultu

re P

rodu

ctiv

ity P

roje

ct (B

AD

C- s

eed

and

wat

e r m

anag

emen

t com

pone

nt)

100%

43

3 25

6 17

7 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

BM

DA

Bar

ind

Rai

n W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n an

d Ir

rigat

ion

Proj

ect (

Phas

eII)

10

0%

6,61

2 6,

612

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Dee

p Tu

bew

ell I

nsta

llatio

n Pr

ojec

t pha

se II

10

0%

4,14

4 4,

144

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Enha

ncem

ent o

f Irr

igat

ion

Effic

ienc

y Th

roug

h C

onst

ruct

ion

of S

ub-s

urfa

ce Ir

rigat

ion

Cha

nnel

10

0%

12,2

37

12,2

37

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Expa

nsio

n of

Irrig

atio

n Fa

cilit

y by

Incr

easi

ng A

vaila

bilit

y of

surf

ace

wat

er a

nd re

mov

ing

wat

er

logg

ing

in N

aoga

on D

istri

ct

100%

6,

813

6,81

3 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

Ex

tens

ion

of Ir

rigat

ion

in B

arin

d A

rea

thro

ugh

Con

serv

atio

n of

Wat

er in

Can

al

100%

9,

124

9,12

4 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Pa

ncha

garh

,Tha

kurg

aon,

Din

ajpu

r and

Joyp

urha

t Int

egra

ted

Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

10

0%

4,56

5 4,

565

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Reh

abili

tatio

n of

old

dee

p tu

be w

ells

in R

ajsh

ahi,

Nao

gaon

and

cha

pai N

awab

gonj

dis

trict

10

0%

2,79

2 2,

792

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

BR

DB

evit is ne s-noitirt un

- 945

945

% 001 e

mmar gor p n ois nap xe noi tagirrI B

RR

IM

ujib

naga

r Int

egra

ted

Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

10

0%

175

175

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

BW

DB

evit isnes-n oi tirt un

152, 53 932,6

09 4,14

%001 )tnenop

moC

BD

WB( e

mmargorP dlo

G eulB B

urig

anga

Riv

er R

esto

ratio

n Pr

ojec

t (N

ew D

hale

swar

i-Pun

gli-B

ongs

hai-T

urag

-Bur

igan

ga ri

ver

syst

em)

67%

53

,538

53

,538

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e evitroppus-no itirtun -

383,11 383,11

%001

hsedalg naB ni s

metsy S reviR fo gnigder

D )tolip( latipaC

evitroppus-noitirtun 897,8

269,1 067,01

%001

)B

DW

B( 4 marg orP tne

meltteS dna tnempoleve

D r ahC D

evel

opm

ent o

f irr

igat

ion

and

re-e

xcav

atio

n of

Cur

zon

cana

ls a

nd a

djac

ent b

ranc

hes o

f Com

illa

dist

rict

100%

1,

575

1,57

5 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Gaz

ner B

ill L

ink

Riv

er E

xcav

atio

n, D

evel

opm

ent o

f Irr

igat

ion

Faci

litie

s and

fish

cul

tivat

ion

proj

ect a

t Suj

anag

ar U

pazi

la in

Pab

na D

istri

ct (B

WD

B p

art)

100%

24

,433

24

,433

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e e vit ro pp us- noi tir tun -

3 34, 11 3 34,11

%00 1

tc ejorP no it aro ts eR rev i

R ia roG

evitroppu s-noitir tun 546,5 2

483 ,71 0 30,34

%54

t ce jorp tnemevorp

mi doohi levil dn a erutc uts arfnI ro aH Ir

rigat

ion

Man

agem

ent I

mpr

ovem

ent P

roje

ct (F

or M

uhur

i Irr

igat

ion

190,24

%001 )PI

M I( tcejo rP 8,

197

33,8

94

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

evitroppus-noitirtun -

478,45 478,45

%001

tnemegana

M reviR araihsu

K-inlaK M

alia

ra-B

akkh

ain-

Van

derg

aon

Floo

d C

ontro

l, dr

aina

ge &

Irrig

atio

n Pr

ojec

t (2n

d Ph

ase)

in

Upa

zila

: Pat

iya,

Dis

trict

: Chi

ttago

ng

100%

2,

252

2,25

2 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

Pre-

mon

soon

Flo

od P

rote

ctio

n an

d D

rain

age

Impr

ovem

ent i

n evitroppus-noitirtun

- 154,41

154,41

% 52 saer

A roaH

Proc

urem

ent o

f dre

dger

s and

rele

vant

mac

hine

tool

s for

dre

dgin

g riv

er o

f Ban

glad

esh

100%

68

,336

68

,336

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e R

e-ex

cava

tion

of B

emel

ia, L

agan

Bal

bhad

ra ri

ver u

nder

Nas

irnag

ar u

pazi

la in

Bra

hman

baria

and

H

abig

anj D

istri

ct

100%

1,

779

1,77

9 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

Ree

xcav

atio

n of

Tita

s Riv

er (U

pper

) und

er B

rahm

anba

ria

5,51 745,51

%001

tcirtsiD

47

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Riv

er b

ank

prot

ectio

n w

ork

on b

oth

Ban

k of

San

gu &

Cha

ndkh

ali R

iver

in C

hand

anai

sh a

nd

Satk

ania

Upa

zila

of C

hitta

gong

Dis

trict

10

0%

14,2

56

14,2

56

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive eviti sne s- no itirtu n

4 71, 04 718, 7

199,74

% 00 1 )2 -es ah P( tne

meg anaM dn a gni nn alP s ecruos e

R retaW de targetnI aer

A ts ewhtu oS

e vitisn es-noiti rtu n -

588,4 5 88,4

%05

t cej or P noitagirr I dna e ga niarD , lo rtn oc d oolF airuhca P l iaraT


201,3 1 201,31

%001

esa hP dn2, tc ejorP egar raB atseeT


232,1 124,4

%001

)desiver laiceps( tcejorP tnemevorp

mI tnemegana

M retaW L

GE

D

Agr

icul

tura

l sup

port

for f

arm

ers i

n So

uthw

este

rn re

gion

- LG

ED p

art

100%

5,

058

361

4,69

7 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Ban

glad

esh

Agr

icul

ture

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct.

25%

2,

939

350

2,58

9 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t pro

ject

for p

artic

ipat

ory

wat

er re

sour

ces m

anag

emen

t thr

ough

inte

grat

ed

100%

2,

028

340

1,68

8 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

ru

ral d

evel

opm

ent

Con

stru

ctio

n of

Rub

ber D

ams i

n Sm

all &

Med

ium

Riv

ers f

or in

crea

sing

Foo

d Pr

oduc

tion

(LG

ED)

100%

3,

536

3,53

6 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

Parti

cipa

tory

Sm

all-S

cale

Wat

er R

esou

rces

Sec

tor P

roje

ct (3

rd p

hase

) 10

0%

28,8

51

7,38

5 21

,466

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

I.2.4

. Miti

gate

the

effe

cts o

f sal

ine

wat

er in

trus

ion

and

its im

pact

on

food

pro

duct

ion

and

impl

icat

ions

for

cons

umpt

ion

50

,557

50

,557

-

BW

DB

R

ehab

ilita

tion

of B

WD

B in

fras

truct

ure

Dam

aged

by

Nat

ural

Dis

aste

r in

the

Coa

stal

Are

a of

Po

lder

No

64/1

A, 6

4/1B

& 6

4/1C

at B

ansk

hali

Upa

zila

in C

hitta

gong

Dis

trict

10

0%

25,0

30

25,0

30

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Reh

abili

tatio

n of

Dam

aged

Pol

ders

und

e3,52

%001

tcirtsiD ra za

B s'xoC r

84

25,3

84

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

SRD

Inu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Inte

grat

ed A

gric

ultu

ral D

evel

opm

ent p

roje

ct in

Piro

jpur

, Gop

algo

nj, B

ager

hat (

IAD

P-PG

B)

SRD

I par

t 50

%

143

143

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

058,32 282,012

231,432

sdoof ecru os lamina fo n oitcu dorp elbania tsus d na y tivitcudorp d ecn ahn

E . 3.I I.3.1

. Im

prov

e m

anag

emen

t of f

ishe

ries

, liv

esto

ck a

nd p

oultr

y to

incr

ease

pro

duct

ion

and

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd n

utri

tiona

l val

ue w

hile

ens

urin

g su

stai

nabi

lity

11

9,47

8 10

3,33

2 16

,146

BW

DB

evitisnes-noitirtun

821,6 451,4

182,01

%11 tcejo rp tne

mevorpmi dooh ilevi l dna e rut cuts ar fnI ro a

H DL

SEs

tabl

ishm

ent o

f Reg

iona

l duc

k br

eadi

ng fa

rm a

long

with

hat

cher

y (3

rd p

hase

) 10

0%

10,7

99

10,7

99

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Esta

blis

hmen

t of U

pazi

la L

ives

tock

Dev

elop

men

t Cen

tre (3

rd P

hase

) 10

0%

7,23

7 7,

237

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DoF

Esta

blis

hmen

t of f

ishe

ries d

iplo

ma

inst

itute

in G

opal

g 415,1

%33

j na gero hsiK ,jn o

1,51

4 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Ex

pans

ion

of F

ishe

ries T

echn

olog

y Se

rv

%76 )II es ah P( leveL noi n

U ot pu s eci13

,019

13

,019

-

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Ex

pans

ion

of F

ishe

ries T

echn

olog

y Se

%33 )I I esah P( lev eL n oin

U ot pu s eci vr

6,50

9 6,

509

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti


- 290,3

290,3

%001 t cejorp noisivid rup gna

R ni t nemp ol eve d seire hsiF

e vitisnes- noitirtun -

907,02 9 07,02

%001

tci rtsiD alli

m oC r eta erg fo tn e

mpol eved seir ehsiF ev iti sne s-n oitirt un

- 236, 1

23 6,1

%001 t ce jor p dr ac yt itnedi fo gnius si dna noi tartsi ger s ei rehs iF

e vit isnes-n oi tirt un -

919,1 919,1

%00 1

tce jor p e rut luca uq a de sab yti num

m oc is agme e

N evitisnes-noitirtun

- 910, 52

910,52

%001 noitcud orp hsif gnisae rcnI rof noita

mr ofer retaW L

GE

D

Hao

r Flo

od M

anag

emen

t and

Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent p

roje

ct

11%

8,

737

2,85

9 5,

877

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e H

aor I

nfra

stru

ctur

e &

Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent p

roje

ct.

11%

5,

650

1,52

3 4,

127

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e M

ilk V

ita

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e evitisnes-noiti rtun 41

485 895

%001

noitcudorP kliM g nic nahn E rof noita tS gnidaer

B olaffuB fo tne

mh silbatsE MoF

L

Inte

grat

ed fi

sher

ies a

nd li

vest

ock

deve

lopm

ent p

roje

ct in

floo

d co

ntro

l and

com

man

d ar

ea

(dra

inag

e an

d irr

igat

ion

proj

ect a

rea)

and

oth

er w

ater

bod

ies (

4th

phas

e)

100%

2,

763

2,76

3 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

I.3

.2. S

usta

in m

icro

nutr

ient

-ric

h an

imal

food

pro

duct

ion

thro

ugh

cons

ervi

ng fi

sher

ies a

nd

lives

tock

bio

dive

rsity

70,9

54

70,9

54

-

BL

RI


533 533

%001

tcejorP tnempoleve

D olaffuB C

onse

rvat

ion

and

impr

ovem

ent o

f nat

ive

shee

p th

roug

h co

mm

unity

farm

ing

and

com

mer

cial

fa

rmin

g pr

ojec

t (co

mpo

nent

A) (

2nd

phas

e)

100%

46

6 46

6 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive


014 014

%00 1

tcejo rP tnempoleve

D dna noitavresnoC yrtluoP )ihse

D ( gnignevacS DL

SA

rtific

ial I

nsem

inat

ion

Act

iviti

es E

xten

sion

and

Em

bryo

tran

sfer

(ET)

tech

nolo

gy

Impl

emen

tatio

n Pr

ojec

t (3r

d Ph

ase)

10

0%

26,1

43

26,1

43

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Bre

ed U

pgra

datio

n Th

roug

h Pr

ogen

y Te

st P

roje

ct p

hase

III

100%

3,

289

3,28

9 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

B

uffa

lo D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct

100%

1,

456

1,45

6 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

C

onse

rvat

ion

& Im

prov

emen

t of N

ativ

e Sh

eep

Thro

ugh

Com

mun

ity F

arm

ing

& C

omm

erci

al

Farm

ing

Proj

ect (

com

pone

nt B

: DLS

) - 2

nd P

hase

10

0%

1,00

6 1,

006

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Esta

blis

hmen

t of I

nstit

ute

of L

ives

tock

scie

nce

and

tech

nolo

gy

100%

19

,599

19

,599

-

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

D

oF evitisnes-noitirtun

- 889,1

889,1

%001 )esa hp d r3( T

HC ni tcejorp noisnet xe seirehsif dna tne

mpole ved erut luc auqA

evitisn es-n oitirtun -

731 ,3 731,3

%001

) esah p dr3( tcejorp tn emhsi lbat sE kn a

B doorB Es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f bee

l nur

sery

and

fing

erlin

g st

ocki

ng in

evitisn es- no itir tu n

- 73 5, 7

735, 7

% 001 s reta

w nepo dnalniEs

tabl

ishm

ent o

f fis

herie

s dip

lom

a in

stitu

te in

Gop

alg

415 ,1

%3 3 jnagerohsi

K ,jno1,

514

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Reh

abili

tatio

n an

d de

velo

pmen

t of f

ishe

ries i

nfra

stru

ctur

e to

incr

ease

pro

duct

ion

of q

ualit

y fis

h se

ed a

nd fi

nger

lings

10

0%

4,07

3 4,

073

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

I.3.3

. Str

engt

hen

sust

aina

ble

shri

mp

aqua

cultu

re, m

arin

e fis

heri

es a

nd fa

rmin

g sy

stem

s

senoz l acih pargoeg ot detpada16

,534

8,

996

7,53

7

DoF


289,5 980,7

%001

tcejorp gnidliub yticapac seirehsif eniram hsedalgna

B evitisnes-noitirtun

134,6 005,1

139,7

%001 )hsi focE( seire hsi F l atsao

C dec nahnE Esta

blis

hmen

t of f

ishe

ries d

iplo

ma

inst

itute

in G

opal

g 415,1

%33

jn ag eroh siK ,jno

1,51

4 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

I.3

.4. I

mpr

ove

fishe

ries

, liv

esto

ck a

nd p

oultr

y he

alth

serv

ices

, qua

lity

inpu

ts a

nd

surv

eilla

nce

27,1

66

27,0

00

BL

RI

e vitis nes- noi tirtun -

5 59 559

% 001

tcejo rp t nem poleve d dna hcraese r red doF

evitisnes-noitirt un -

884 884

%001

hse dalg naB ni hc raeser

R PP dna esaesid htuom dna t ooF D

LS

Ani

mal

Nut

ritio

n D

evel

opm

ent a

nd T

echn

olog

y Tr

ansf

er P

roje

ct (2

nd p

hase

) 10

0%

2,01

7 2,

017

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Esta

blis

hmen

t of J

hena

idah

vet

e rin

ary

colle

ge (2

nd p

hase

) 10

0%

636

636

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Esta

blis

hmen

t of n

atio

nal i

nstit

ute

of li

vest

ock

and

poul

try m

anag

emen

t and

dis

ease

dia

gnos

tic

labo

rato

ry10

0%

3,33

4 3,

334

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

Es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f Sira

jgon

j Gov

t. V

eter

inar

y co

llege

10

0%

4,04

5 4,

045

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Inte

grat

ed A

gric

ultu

re P

rodu

ctiv

ity P

roje

ct (I

APP

) 10

0%

177

11

167

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Li

vest

ock

Dis

ease

Pre

vent

ion

and

Con

trol P

roje

ct

100%

3,

067

3,06

7 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

M

oder

niza

tion

of V

acci

ne P

rodu

ctio

n Te

chno

logy

& E

xten

sion

of L

abor

ator

y Fa

cilit

ies P

roje

ct

100%

4,

413

4,41

3 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

So

uth

East

Reg

ion

Live

stoc

k D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct

100%

4,

992

4,99

2 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

D

oF evitisnes-noitirtun

- 240,3

240,3

%001 tcejorP l ortno

C dna noitn ev erP esaesiD kcot seviL I.

Div

ersif

ied

and

sust

aina

ble

agri

cultu

re, f

ishe

ries

and

live

stoc

k fo

r he

alth

y di

ets T

otal

1,

280,

203

1,02

8,98

0 25

1,22

3 II

.1. S

tren

gthe

ned

post

-har

vest

val

ue c

hain

with

par

ticul

ar fo

cus o

n M

SME

s (st

orag

e,

proc

essi

ng, b

rand

ing,

labe

lling

, mar

ketin

g an

d tr

ade)

41,7

94

29,0

51

12,7

43

II.1

.1.

Dev

elop

skill

s and

stre

ngth

en c

apac

ity to

pro

cess

and

supp

ly sa

fe a

nd n

utri

ent-

rich

fo

ods w

ith e

mph

asis

on

qual

ity st

anda

rds a

nd n

utri

ent l

abel

ling

info

rmat

ion

5,

939

132

5,80

6

DA

E

evitropp us-noitirt un 621

011 632

%8

tcej or P noita cifisr ev iD s po r

C dn oceS MoC

omm

erce

A

grib

usin

ess f

or T

rade

Com

petit

iven

ess P

roje

ct (A

TCP)

10

0%

5,70

2 22

5,

680

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e II

.1.2

. Ado

pt a

ppro

pria

te te

chno

logy

and

stre

ngth

en in

fras

truc

ture

to a

llow

qua

lity

sd oof f o noita cifit rof d na noitid da e ulav ,t ne

me vo rpmi

10,7

04

10,7

04

-

BFD

CEs

tabl

ishm

ent o

f fis

h la

ndin

g ce

nter

s with

anc

illar

y fa

cilit

ies i

n 3

coas

tal d

istri

cts a

t 4 se

lect

ed

area

s 10

0%

3,28

5 3,

285

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

DA

MM

ujib

naga

r Int

egra

ted

Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

50

%

12

12

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Milk

Vita

Es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f Sup

er In

stan

t Milk

Pla

nt a

t Bag

haba

righa

t, Si

rajg

onj

100%

7,

407

7,40

7 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e II

.1.3

. Mob

ilise

and

pro

mot

e pr

oduc

er a

nd m

arke

ting

grou

ps fo

r im

prov

ed m

arke

t acc

ess

s re dl oh ll a

m s dna n em o

w rof yll ai ce pse ,rewop gniniagra b dna

25,1

52

18,2

15

6,93

7

BR

DB

e vitr opp us-n oit ir tun

- 35 9, 21

359,21

%0 01 esa hp d n2 )PL

R( tc ejor p doo hilev il laruR D

AE

In

tegr

ated

Far

m M

anag

emen

t, A

gric

ultu

ral P

rodu

ctio

n an

d Em

ploy

men

t Pro

gram

me

33%

9,

553

2,79

9 6,

754

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e D

AM

Fello

w la

nd u

tilis

atio

n an

d cr

op in

tens


392,1 392,1

%001

noiger tehlyS ni tcejorp noitacifi evitropp us-noitirtun

- 21

21

%05 tcejorP tne

mpoleveD la rutlucirg

A d eta rg etnI raganbij uM

evitroppus-n oitir tun -

204 204

% 00 1

tc ejo rp t nem poleved lar utl uci rga d etar ge tni tahre ga

B j naglap oG r up jor iP D

OC

Pove

rty re

duct

ion

and

soci

o-ec

onom

ic d

evel

opm

ent o

f Gre

ater

Far

idpu

r, B

aris

al &

Khu

lna

Dis

trict

s thr

ough

Exp

ansi

on o

f Milk

Co-

oper

ativ

e So

ciet

y Pr

ogra

mm

es

100%

68

7 68

7 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

R

DA

evitroppu s-noitirtun 381

07 252

%001

)C4

M( srahC a tse T dna a

mdaP ,anumaJ eht rof kro

w stekr aM gnika

M 921,843

735,911,1 666,764,1

noi ta

mrofni dna se itilica f ,ste kram ot ssecca d evorp

mI . 2.II II.2

.1. I

mpr

ove

mar

ket i

nfra

stru

ctur

es, p

hysic

al a

cces

s to

mar

ket f

acili

t 317,443

1 51, 911 ,1 368,364,1

se i

BA

RI

evit roppus- noitir tun -

4 4

%52

tcejorP tnempoleve

D larutlucirgA detarge tnI raganbiju

M BFD

CEs

tabl

ishm

ent o

f fis

h la

ndin

g ce

nter

s in

Hao

r and

bao

r are

a in

Ban

glad

esh

100%

5,

833

5,83

3 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e B

MD

AM

arke

ting

of A

gric

ultu

ral P

rodu

cts t

hrou

gh D

evel

opm

ent o

f Rur

al C

omm

unic

atio

n Pr

ojec

t 10

0%

7,09

7 7,

097

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

BW

DB

Pr

e-m

onso

on F

lood

Pro

tect

ion

and

Dra

inag

e Im

prov

emen

t in

Hao

r Are

as

25%

14

,451

14

,451

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e D

DM

Con

stru

ctio

n of

brid

ge/c

ulve

rt (u

p to

12

m lo

ng) o

n th

e ru

ral r

oads

at C

hitta

gong

Hill

Tra

cts

regi

on (2

nd p

hase

) 10

0%

2,62

7 2,

627

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

LG

ED

B

angl

ades

h A

gric

ultu

re In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

. 75

%

8,81

6 1,

049

7,76

7 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Bar

isal

Div

isio

n In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

10

0%

42,4

33

42,4

33

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Cha

r Dev

elop

men

t & S

ettle

men

t-4 (L

GED

com

pone

nt)

88%

6,

615

1,30

1 5,

314

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e C

hitta

gong

Hill

Tra

cts R

ural

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

(2nd

Pha

se) L

GED

Com

pone

nt

100%

21

,434

3,

776

17,6

59

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e C

limat

e C

hang

e A

dapt

atio

n Pi

lot P

roje

ct.

50%

2,

686

2,39

9 28

7 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Coa

stal

Clim

ate

Res

ilien

t Inf

rast

ruct

ure

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ct

100%

83

,729

18

,075

65

,654

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Con

stru

ctio

n of

two

brid

ges o

n th

e riv

er B

rahm

aput

ra u

nder

Isla

mpu

r Upa

zila

of J

amal

pur

Dis

trict

10

0%

3,02

2 3,

022

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Dev

elop

men

t of I

mpo

rtant

Rur

al In

fras

truct

ure

Proj

ect (

DIR

IP)

100%

32

,317

32

,317

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f Syl

het D

ivis

ion

Rur

al In

fras

truct

ure

100%

12

,292

12

,292

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f the

Rur

al R

oad

of S

adar

upa

zila

of K

usht

ia

100%

2,

391

2,39

1 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e G

reat

er B

aris

al D

istri

ct a

nd R

ural

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

Hat

-Baz

aar i

nfra

stru

ctur

e de

velo

pmen

t (B

aris

al, P

irojp

ur, B

hola

and

Jhal

kati

dist

ricts

) 10

0%

5,37

4 5,

374

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Gre

ater

Far

idpu

r dis

trict

rura

l inf

rast

ruct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

(2nd

Rev

ised

) 10

0%

86,6

96

86,6

96

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Gre

ater

Far

idpu

r rur

al in

fras

truct

ure

deve

lopm

ent (

2nd

Phas

e)

100%

78

,213

78

,213

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e G

reat

er N

oakh

ali R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct (P

art-I

I).

100%

28

,445

28

,445

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e G

reat

er R

angp

ur a

nd D

inaj

pur D

istri

ct R

ural

Com

mun

icat

ion

and

othe

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ct (2

nd R

evis

ion)

10

0%

21,4

63

21,4

63

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Hao

r Flo

od M

anag

emen

t and

Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent p

roje

ct

85%

67

,510

22

,095

45

,415

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Hao

r Inf

rast

ruct

ure

& L

ivel

ihoo

d Im

prov

emen

t pro

ject

. 85

%

43,6

58

11,7

69

31,8

89

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e Im

porta

nt R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f Gop

algo

nj D

istri

ct

100%

61

,384

61

,384

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

Im

porta

nt R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f Kis

hore

gonj

Sad

ar a

nd H

oshe

npur

Upa

zila

in

Kis

horg

anj D

istri

ct10

0%

2,39

0 2,

390

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent i

n th

e G

reat

er C

hitta

gong

(Chi

ttago

ng a

nd C

ox's

Baz

ar D

istri

ct)

100%

36

,100

36

,100

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t in

the

Gre

ater

Jess

ore

Dis

trict

(Jes

sore

, Jhe

naid

a, M

agur

a &

Nar

ail

dist

ricts

) 10

0%

25,4

74

25,4

74

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct in

Gre

ater

Kus

htia

Dis

trict

(Kus

htia

, Chu

adan

ga &

M

eher

pur D

istri

ct).

100%

18

,015

18

,015

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

Rur

al In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t of A

kkel

pur,

Kal

ai a

nd K

hetla

l Upa

zila

in Jo

ypur

hat D

istri

ct

100%

2,

008

2,00

8 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f Cita

lmar

i, M

olla

hat a

nd F

akirh

at in

Bag

erha

t Dis

trict

10

0%

2,33

0 2,

330

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Rur

al In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t of C

omill

a, C

hand

pur a

nd B

rahm

anba

ria D

istri

ct

100%

47

,412

47

,412

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f Fak

irhat

in B

ager

hat D

istri

ct

100%

2,

198

2,19

8 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f Far

idpu

r Sad

ar U

pazi

la in

Far

idpu

r Dis

trict

10

0%

2,24

4 2,

244

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Rur

al In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t of G

reat

er P

abna

-Bog

ra D

istri

ct

100%

46

,409

46

,409

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f Gre

ater

Raj

s hah

i dis

trict

(Raj

shah

i, N

aoga

on, N

ator

e an

d C

hapa

inab

abga

nj) p

roje

ct

100%

39

,832

39

,832

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

Rur

al In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t of K

ulia

rcha

r and

Bha

irab

Upa

zila

in K

isho

rega

nj D

istri

ct

100%

2,

417

2,41

7 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f Mat

hbar

ia U

pazi

la in

Piro

jpur

Dis

trict

10

0%

2,02

8 2,

028

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Rur

al In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t of M

olla

hat i

n B

ager

hat D

istri

ct

100%

2,

094

2,09

4 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e D

evel

opm

ent o

f Nar

ia U

pazi

la in

Sar

iatp

ur D

istri

ct

100%

1,

500

1,50

0 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e R

ural

Roa

d, B

ridge

s/C

ulve

rts a

nd o

ther

Infr

astru

ctur

e de

velo

pmen

t of b

ackw

ard

Upa

zila

s (P

abna

, Sira

jgon

j, N

ator

e, N

aoga

on, R

ajsh

ahi,

Nob

abgo

nj a

nd B

ogra

dis

trict

s) in

the

Nor

th-W

est

regi

on o

f the

cou

ntry

10

0%

13,3

23

13,3

23

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Rur

al T

rans

port

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ct (R

TIP-

2)

100%

22

1,97

9 62

,331

15

9,64

8 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Sust

aina

ble

rura

l inf

rast

ruct

ure

impr

ovem

ent p

roje

ct (S

RII

P)

100%

24

,471

13

,392

11

,080

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Uni

on In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

(Khu

lna,

Bag

erha

t & S

athk

hira

Dis

trict

) 10

0%

11,0

79

11,0

79

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Uni

on li

nk R

oad

& In

fras

truct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

: Gre

ater

Chi

ttago

ng (C

hitta

gong

& C

ox's

Baz

ar) D

istri

ct

100%

10

,391

10

,391

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

MoD

MR

evitroppus-noitirtun

- 876,113

876,113

%001 sdao

R laruR no gnol rete

m 51 ssel ro erom strevlu

C/egdirB fo noitcurtsno

C 614,3

6 83 208,3

se itilica f T

CI f o tn emhsilb atse e ht gn idulcni n oitan i

messid noi tamrofn i pu-el acS .3 .2.II M

oCom

mer

ce

evitroppus -noi tirtun 614 ,3

71 1 335,3

%00 1

em

mar gorP htwor

G cimonocE hs edalg na

B RD

CD

St

reng

then

ing

ICT

Prog

ram

and

E-s

ervi

ce fo

r Rur

al P

over

ty a

llevi

atio

n 10

0%

269

269

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

II. E

ffic

ient

and

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve p

ost-

harv

est t

rans

form

atio

n an

d va

lue

addi

tion

Tot

al

1,50

9,46

0 1,

148,

587

360,

872

III.1

. Enh

ance

d nu

triti

on k

now

ledg

e, p

rom

otio

n of

goo

d pr

actic

es, a

nd c

onsu

mpt

ion

of sa

fe

and

nutr

itiou

s die

ts

27

,777

6,

686

21,0

91

III.1

.1. S

cale

up

nutr

ition

trai

ning

, beh

avio

ur c

hang

e co

mm

unic

atio

ns (B

CC

) for

enh

ance

d kn

owle

dge,

safe

stor

age,

hou

seho

ld p

roce

ssin

g an

d im

prov

ed c

onsu

mpt

ion

2,

767

1,47

6 1,

291


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

B

IRT

AN

In

tegr

ated

Agr

icul

tura

l App

roac

h fo

r Ens

urin

g N

utrit

ion

and

Food

Sec

urity

Pro

ject

(BIR

TAN

ph

ase)

10

0%

568

568

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DG

FPIn

form

atio

n, E

duca

tion

and

Com

mun

icat

ion

(FP)

10

0%

2,19

9 90

8 1,

291

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

II

I.1.2

. Pre

vent

and

con

trol

non

-com

mun

icab

le d

isea

ses (

NC

Ds)

and

ens

ure

heal

thy

diet

s th

roug

h pr

omot

ion

of d

ieta

ry g

uide

lines

link

ed w

ith n

atio

nal N

CD

stra

tegi

es a

nd r

elat

ed

nutr

ition

serv

ices

25,0

10

5,21

0 19

,800

LG

D


012,5 010,52

%001

hsedalgnaB ot no itirtu

N dna ht laeH nabr

U ot tro pp uS III.2

. Opt

imis

ed fo

od u

tilis

atio

n th

roug

h pr

ovis

ion

of sa

fe w

ater

, im

prov

ed fo

od h

ygie

ne

and

sani

tatio

n

108,

812

85,9

83

22,8

28

III.2

.1. S

cale

up

the

supp

ly o

f saf

e w

ater

for

cons

umpt

ion

and

dom

estic

use

103,

436

85,2

21

18,2

15

DPH

E


148,2 331,81

%08

)PSSW

RB ( tc ejo rP noita tinaS d na y lppuS r eta

W l ar uR hs eda lg na

B evitisne s- noit irtun

607 31 1

918

%001 )tn eno p

moC E

H PD( 4 -t cej or P tne

meltt eS dna tnemp ole ve

D r ahC G

roun

d W

ater

Inve

stig

atio

n an

d D

evel

opm

ent o

f Dee

p G

roun

d W

ater

Sou

rce

in U

rban

and

R

ural

Are

as in

Ban

glad

esh

100%

4,

842

2,62

5 2,

217

nutri

tion-

sens

itive


14 6,97 146,9 7

%00 1

s aerA l aru

R ni y lpp uS r et aW II

I.2.2

. Ens

ure

hygi

enic

food

han

dlin

g, p

repa

ratio

n an

d se

rvic

es, a

nd sc

ale-

up h

and

was

hing

beh

avio

ur

632

39

593

MoA

eviti sn es-noitirtun 3 95

9 3 236

%5 1

)P PAI( t ce jor P yti vitc udo rP e ru tlu cirg

A deta rg etnI III.2

.3.

Impr

ove

sani

tary

faci

litie

s and

pra

ctic

es -i

nclu

ding

the

prev

entio

n of

ani

mal

cro

ss-

cont

amin

atio

n- fo

r re

duci

ng d

iarr

heal

and

food

bor

ne il

lnes

s and

chi

ld u

nder

nutr

ition

4,74

4 72

3

DPH

E

evitisnes-n oitirt un 3 28,3

017 3 35 ,4

%02

)PS SW

RB( t cejorP noi tati na S d na ylp pu S reta

W laruR hs edalgna

B MoA

Inte

grat

ed A

gric

ultu

re P

rodu

ctiv

ity P

roje

ct (I

APP

) 5%

21

1 13

19

8 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

III.

Impr

oved

die

tary

div

ersi

ty, c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n T

otal

13

6,58

9 92

,669

43

,919

IV

.1. T

imel

y an

d ef

fect

ive

disa

ster

pre

pare

dnes

s and

res

pons

es th

roug

h em

erge

ncy

food

di

stri

butio

n, st

eps t

owar

ds a

gric

ultu

ral s

ecto

r re

habi

litat

ion

and

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

75

3,23

3 12

5,99

9 62

7,23

3

IV.1

.1.

Incr

ease

the

resi

lienc

e of

agr

icul

tura

l sys

tem

s, in

clud

ing

the

prod

uctio

n of

dis

aste

r-re

silie

nt n

utri

tious

cro

ps e

spec

ially

by

vuln

erab

le p

opul

atio

ns

56

7,81

8 87

,921

47

9,89

7

BW

DB

C

oast

al e

mba

nkm

ent i

mpr

ovem

ent p

roje

ct P

hase

I (C

EIP

I) in

Sat

khira

, Khu

lna,

Bag

erha

t, Pi

rojp

ur, B

argu

na, a

nd P

atua

khal

i Dis

trict

10

0%

310,

648

(2,3

60)

313,

008

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

Emer

genc

y 20

07 C

yclo

ne R

ecov

ery

and

Res

tora

tion

Proj

ect (

EC evitr opp us-noitirtun

343, 32 801

054 ,32

%001 t raP

BD

WB ) P

RR

evit ro ppu s- no itirt un 412,94

70 7, 01 129, 95

%0 01

ma rg or P tne

m tsev nI t neme gan a

M ks iR nois orE kna

B reviR

& doo lF


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

Pr

e-m

onso

on F

lood

Pro

tect

ion

and

Dra

inag

e Im

prov

emen

t in


109,82 109,82

%05

sae rA r oa

H Pr

eser

vatio

n of

the

left

bank

of t

he ri

ver P

adm

a fr

om B

oairb

azar

, Doh

ar U

pazi

la in

Dha

ka

Dis

trict

to B

raha

baj

arag

hata

10

0%

21,7

62

21,7

62

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Prot

ectio

n of

Lef

t Ban

k of

Meg

hna

Riv

er T

hrou

gh B

ank

Rev

etm

ent w

ork

at M

anik

naga

r of

Nab

inag

ar U

pazi

la o

f Bra

hman

baria

Dis

trict

10

0%

3,37

2 3,

372

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Shib

pur F

lood

Con

trol,

Dra

inag

e an

d Ir

rigat

ion

Proj

ect u

nder

Shi

bpur

Upa

zila

in N

arsh

ingd

i D

istri

ct

100%

4,

242

4,24

2 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e evitropp us-n oitirtun -

588,4 588,4

%05

tcej orP no itagirrI d na eganiarD ,l ortno c doolF a ir uhca P liar aT D

DM

Con

stru

ctio

n of

floo

d sh

elte

rs in

the

flood

pro

ne a

nd ri

ver e

rosi

on a

reas

(2nd

pha

se)

100%

8,

002

8,00

2 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

D

MB

Em

erge

ncy

2007

Cyc

lone

Rec

over

y an

d R

esto

ratio

n Pr

ojec

t (EC

RR

P): D

isas

ter R

isks

Miti

gatio

n an

d R

educ

tion

100%

-

- -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

DoF

ores

try

Cha

r Dev

elop

men

t and

Set

tlem

ent P

roje

ct-4

(Do

Fore

st P

art)

100%

1,

352

106

1,24

5 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

LG

D

Impr

ovem

ent o

f Wom

en A

bilit

y to

Par

ticip

ate

in P

rodu

ctiv

e Po

tent

ial A

ctio

n (S

WA

PNO

) 25

%

20,8

96

5,00

7 15

,890

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

veL

GE

D

Cha

r Dev

elop

men

t & S

ettle

men

t-4 (L

GED

com

pone

nt)

12%

90

2 17

7 72

5 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Pilo

t Pro

ject

50

%

2,68

6 2,

399

287

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e Em

erge

ncy

2007

Cyc

lone

Rec

over

y an

d R

ehab

ilita

tion

Proj

ect (

ECR

RP)

10

0%

68,4

48

349

68,0

99

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e Pl

anni

ng D

ivis

ion

Emer

genc

y 20

07 C

yclo

ne R

ecov

ery

and

Res

tora

tion

Proj

ect (

ECR

RP)

: Pro

ject

Coo

rdin

atio

n an

d M

onito

ring

Uni

t 10

0%

8,35

0 26

4 8,

086

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

IV.1

.2. E

nsur

e so

cial

and

eco

nom

ic a

cces

s to

food

for

the

poor

est s

ectio

ns o

f the

pop

ulat

ion

retsasid yb detc effa t so

m s ae ra ni dna s isi rc f o sem it ni

1,23

8 1,

238

-

DoF

Cul

ture

of C

uchi

a an

d C

rab

in th

e Se

lect

ed A

reas

of B

angl

ades

h an

d R

esea

rch

Proj

ect

(Com

pone

nt A

: DoF

) 10

0%

1,23

8 1,

238

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

IV.1

.3. S

cale

-up

mod

ern

food

stor

age

faci

litie

s for

impr

oved

Pub

lic F

ood

Dis

trib

utio

n

s ae ra e nor p-r ets asid ni ylral ucitr ap met syS

184,

177

36,8

40

147,

336

MoF

ood

e viti sn es-no iti rtun -

9 55 ,4 3 9 55 ,4 3

%0 01

tcej or P nwo do

G doo F wen yti cap a

C TM hk al 50 .1 fo n oi tc ur tsn o

C Con

stru

ctio

n of

mul

tisto

ried

war

ehou

se a

t San

taha

r Gra

in S

ilo P

rem

ises

, Bog

ra (2

5,00

0 M

T)

100%

2,

290

2,06

1 22

9 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

veM

oder

n Fo

od S

tora

ge F

acili

ties P

roje

ct (M

FSP)

80

%

147,

327

220

147,

107

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

IV

.2. S

tren

gthe

ned

cash

and

food

-bas

ed p

rogr

amm

es fo

r ta

rget

ed g

roup

s acr

oss t

he li

fe

cycl

e in

clud

ing

disa

bled

and

dis

plac

ed p

opul

atio

ns

62

0,70

0 28

9,78

7 33

0,91

3


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

IV

.2.1

. Exp

and

and

stre

ngth

en sa

fety

net

pro

gram

mes

acr

oss t

he li

fe c

ycle

supp

ortin

g vu

lner

able

gro

ups s

uch

as p

oor

wom

en, c

hild

ren,

the

elde

rly,

disa

bled

peo

ple

and

disp

lace

d po

pula

tions

142,

961

79,6

83

63,2

78

BFR

IC

ultu

re o

f Cuc

hia

and

Cra

b in

the

Sele

cted

Are

as o

f Ban

glad

esh

and

Res

earc

h Pr

ojec

t (C

ompo

nent

B: B

FRI)

10

0%

1,11

8 1,

118

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

BR

DB

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Initi

ativ

e fo

r Dev

elop

men

t, Em

pow

erm

ent,

Aw

aren

ess a

nd L

ivel

ihoo

d Pr

ojec

t (ID

EAL

proj

ect),

K

urig

ram

25

%

190

190

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Parti

cipa

tory

Rur

al D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct-3

(PR

DP-

3)

50%

11

,484

11

,484

-

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

L

GD

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Impr

ovem

ent o

f Wom

en A

bilit

y to

Par

ticip

ate

in P

rodu

ctiv

e Po

tent

ial A

ctio

n (S

WA

PNO

) 65

%

54,3

30

13,0

17

41,3

13

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

LG

ED

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Rur

al E

mpl

oym

ent a

nd ro

ad M

a int

enan

ce P

rogr

am-2

(RER

MP-

2)

100%

52

,489

41

,910

10

,579

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

MoL

E

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e evi ti snes -n oitir tu n 253,0 1

)637,3( 61 6,6

% 05

)IR

AN ( evitai tin I yt re voP fo noit cu de

R saerA nrehtro

N NW

A

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e Pr

omot

ion

of W

omen

Ent

repr

eneu

rshi

p fo

r Eco

nom

ic E

mpo

wer

men

t (Ph

ase

3)

100%

99

4 99

4 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

PD

BF

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e Ex

tens

ion

of P

rogr

amm

e of

Rur

al P

over

ty A

llevi

atio

n Fo

unda

tion

(PD

BF)

for C

reat

ion

of

Pove

rty A

llevi

atio

n &

Sel

f Em

ploy

men

t 10

0%

8,85

6 8,

856

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

RD

Anu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Inte

grat

ed R

ural

Em

ploy

men

t Sup

port

for t

he P

oor W

omen

(RES

PW)

100%

3,

513

3,51

3 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

R

DC

D

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e evitis ne s-noitirt un 31

991 21 2

%05

esa hP d n2 )PLC ( e

mmar gorP tne

me vorpmI s doohile viL sra h

C Econ

omic

Em

pow

erm

ent o

f the

Poo

r7 0,1

%8 8

)P EE( h sed alg naB ni t se

2 52

1,

021

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

SF

DF

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e Ex

pans

ion

of S

FDF'

s act

iviti

es fo

r pov

erty

Alle

viat

ion

50%

60

3 60

3 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Sm

all F

arm

ers D

evel

opm

ent F

ound

atio

n A

ssis

tanc

e pr

ojec

t (2n

d Ph

ase)

25

%

1,48

6 1,

486

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

IV.2

.2. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

pro

gram

mes

for

supp

ortin

g pe

ople

livi

ng in

vul

nera

ble

and

)sae ra nabru dn a stca rt llih ,s roah ,knab r evir ,d nal rah c( sa era deg atnavda sid

363,

847

116,

220

247,

627

BR

DB

evitisnes-noitirtun

- 190,7

190,7

%001 noige

R nrehtroN fo rooP erocdra

H rof emehcS eetnarau

G tnemyolp

mE evitisnes-noitirtun

- 484,11

484,11

%05 )3-P

DRP( 3-tcejorP tne

mpoleveD laru

R yrotapicitraP LG

D

Inco

me

Supp

ort P

rogr

amm

e fo

r the

Poo

rest

10

0%

237,

389

3,76

5 23

3,62

5 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

LG

ED

evitisnes-noitirtun

731,2 040,1

771,3

%4 tcejorp tne

mevorpmI doohileviL dna tne

meganaM doolF roa

H


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

evitisnes-noitirtun

105,1 455

450,2

%4 .tcejorp tne

me vorpmI doohilevi L

& erutcurtsarfnI roaH M

oCom

mer

ce

Erad

icat

ion

of R

ural

Pov

erty

by

Exte

nsio

n of

Sm

all H

oldi

ng T

ea C

ultiv

atio

n in

Lal

mon

irhat

10

0%

447

447

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

MoL

E

e vi ti snes-n oiti rtu n 253 ,0 1

)637,3( 61 6,6

% 05

)IR

AN( evi tai tinI yt revoP fo n oitcude

R saerA nre htr o

N PMO

A

sray

an P

roje

ct-2

75

%

93,2

88

93,2

88

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

RD

CD

evitisne s-noit irtun

31 991

212

%05 esa hP dn2 )PL

C( em

ma rgor P tneme vo rp

mI sdoohileviL srahC SF

DF

Expa

nsio

n of

SFD

F's a

ctiv

ities

for p

over

ty A

llevi

atio

n 50

%

603

603

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Smal

l Far

mer

s Dev

elop

men

t Fou

ndat

ion

Ass

ista

nce

proj

ect (

2nd

Phas

e)

25%

1,

486

1,48

6 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

IV

.2.3

. Int

rodu

ce n

utri

tion

sens

itive

soci

al sa

fety

net

pro

gram

mes

(SSN

P) in

clud

ing

food

nerdlihc dna srehtom rof ylla ice pse noitacifitrof

113,

892

93,8

85

20,0

07

DPE

evitisnes-noitir tun

732,21 309,09

041,301

%001 a er

A en or P ytrevoP ni em

mar gorP g ni deeF loo hcS LG

D

Impr

ovem

ent o

f Wom

en A

bilit

y to

Par

ticip

ate

in P

rodu

ctiv

e Po

tent

ial A

ctio

n (S

WA

PNO

) 10

%

8,35

9 2,

003

6,35

6 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

MO

WC

A01

em

ma rgo rp D

GV rof tneno p

m oc t nem tsevnI

0%

2,31

7 97

6 1,

341

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

R

DC

D

Econ

omic

Em

pow

erm

ent o

f the

Poo

rest

in B

angl

ades

h (E

EP)

6%

77

473

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n an

d sa

fety

net

s and

incr

ease

d re

silie

nce

Tot

al

1,37

3,93

3 41

5,78

7 95

8,14

6 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

V.1

. Im

prov

ed fo

od sa

fety

, qua

lity

cont

rol a

nd a

ssur

ance

, aw

aren

ess o

n fo

od sa

fety

and

hy

gien

e

9,30

3 7,

715

1,58

7

V.1

.1. E

nsur

e co

nfor

mity

of f

oods

for

cons

umpt

ion

thro

ugh

accr

edita

tion

from

ce

rtifi

catio

n ag

enci

es, i

nspe

ctio

n an

d la

bora

tory

serv

ices

934

17

917

MoF

ood

ev itisnes-noi tir tun 0 76

71 78 6

%3 3

d oo F refaS rof hs eda lgn aB ni ytef aS do oF fo noit azilan oitu titsnI M

oHFW

Im

prov

ing

Food

Saf

ety

in B

angl

ades

h 10

0%

247

-24

7 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

V.1

.2. I

ntro

duce

and

pop

ular

ise

Goo

d A

gric

ultu

ral P

ract

ices

, Goo

d A

quac

ultu

ral P

ract

ices

ytilauq dna ytefas doof erusn e taht secitcarP yrdnabsuH doo

G dna8,

369

7,69

9 67

0

BR

RI


34 34

%02

tcejorP t nempoleve

D erutlucirgA detargetnI tahre ga

B-jnaglpoG-rupjoreP D

AE

Sa

fe C

rop

Prod

uctio

n Pr

ojec

t thr

ough

Inte

grat

ed P

est M

anag

emen

t (IP

M) A

ppro

ach

100%

2,

163

2,16

3 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

sub-

pr

ogra

mm

e

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

alB

y G

oB

By

DPs

St

reng

then

ing

Ban

glad

esh

phyt

osan

itary

cap

abili

ties

100%

4,

955

4,95

5 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

D

oFSt

reng

then

ing

of fi

sher

ies a

nd a

quac

ultu

re fo

od sa

fety

and

qua

lity

man

agem

ent s

yste

m in

B

angl

ades

h 10

0%

521

521

1 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

MoF

ood

Inst

itutio

naliz

atio

n of

Foo

d Sa

fety

in B

angl

ades

h fo

r Saf

er F

ood

33%

68

7 17

67

0 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

V.3

. Im

prov

ed in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta fo

r ev

iden

ce-b

ased

mon

itori

ng a

nd a

djus

tmen

t of

polic

ies a

nd p

rogr

amm

es

35

,497

4,

441

31,0

56

V.3

.1. P

rodu

ce m

ore

relia

ble

and

timel

y FN

S in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta th

roug

h im

prov

ed

info

rmat

ion

infr

astr

uctu

res,

enha

nced

coo

rdin

atio

n in

dat

a co

llect

ion

and

data

exc

hang

e to

im

prov

e ev

iden

ce-b

ased

dec

isio

n m

akin

g, p

olic

y fo

rmul

atio

n an

d pr

ogra

mm

ing

35

,497

4,

441

31,0

56

APS

UO

rient

atio

n A

gric

ultu

re to

war

ds im

prov

e N

utrit

ion

and

Wo

e vitr oppus-noitirtun 4 33

- 433

%00 1

tnemre

w opmE s' ne

mB

BS

Cen

sus o

f the

Und

ocum

ente

d M

yanm

ar N

atio

nals

Sta

ying

in B

angl

ades

h 20

15 P

roje

ct

100%

60

1 60

1 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e H

ouse

hold

Inco

me

and

Expe

nditu

re S

urve

y (H

IES)

Pro

ject

10

0%

1,66

7 1,

367

300

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e M

onito

ring

the

Situ

atio

n of

Vita

l Sta

tistic

s of B

angl

ades

h 10

0%

1,25

5 1,

255

-nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Nat

iona

l Hou

seho

ld D

atab

ase

(NH

D)

100%

31

,300

1,

197

30,1

02

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e St

reng

then

ing

Agr

icul

ture

Mar

ket I

nfor

mat

ion

Syst

em (A

MIS

) in

Ban

glad

esh

100%

34

0 20

32

0 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

V.4

. Im

prov

ed F

NS

gove

rnan

ce, c

apac

ity st

reng

then

ing

and

lead

ersh

ip a

cros

s FN

S re

leva

nt st

akeh

olde

rs

62

,704

1,

139

61,5

65

V.4

.2. S

tren

gthe

n ca

paci

ties t

o de

sign

and

mon

itor

the

new

Foo

d an

d N

utri

tion

Secu

rity

Po

licy

and

impl

emen

t, m

onito

r an

d co

ordi

nate

the

CIP

2

62,7

04

1,13

9 61

,565

DD

MSt

reng

then

ing

of th

e m

inis

try o

f dis

aste

r man

agem

ent a

nd re

lief p

rogr

am a

dmin

istra

tion

100%

21

,501

71

21

,430

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

MoF

ood

Inst

itutio

naliz

atio

n of

Foo

d Sa

fety

in B

angl

ades

h fo

r Saf

er F

ood

33%

68

7 17

67

0 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Mod

ern

Food

Sto

rage

Fac

ilitie

s Pro

ject

(MFS

P)

20%

36

,832

55

36

,777

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Plan

ning

Div

isio

n St

reng

then

ing

Publ

ic In

vest

men

t Man

agem

ent S

yste

m (S

PIM

S)

100%

3,

685

997

2,68

8 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

V. S

tren

gthe

ned

enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent a

nd c

ross

-cut

ting

prog

ram

mes

for

achi

evin

g fo

od

and

nutr

ition

secu

rity

Tot

al

107,

504

13,2

95

94,2

09


Tab

le A

5.6.

Dat

abas

e of

inte

nded

futu

re p

roje

cts

rele

vant

to C

IP2

(fun

ds in

lakh

s ta

ka)

Not

es:

- Pro

gram

mes

and

sub

-pro

gram

mes

with

no

proj

ects

in th

e pi

pelin

e ar

e no

t lis

ted

in th

e ta

ble

belo

w.

- Unl

ike

the

sum

mar

y ta

bles

sho

wn

in th

e C

IP2,

the

amou

nts

prov

ided

in th

is d

atab

ase

are

show

n in

lakh

taka

whi

ch is

the

curr

ency

use

d in

off

icia

l GoB

do

cum

ents

.

Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

thes

e su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

al

By

GoB

B

y D

Ps 449,982

235,35 674,343

smet sys noitcudo rp desab-porc fo noit acifi srevid dna noitacifisnet ni el bania tsu S .1.I I.1

.1. E

nhan

ce a

gric

ultu

ral r

esea

rch

and

know

ledg

e, a

nd te

chno

logy

dev

elop

men

t for

mor

e pr

oduc

tive,

div

erse

, su

stai

nabl

e an

d nu

triti

on-s

ensi

tive

agri

cultu

re

135,

196

34,8

22

100,

373

BA

RC

05 yti capac

CR

AB gnineh tgnertS

%7,

500

-7,

500

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

BA

RI

Enha

nce

farm

cro

p re

sear

ch a

nd e

xpan

sion

of c

rop

tech

nolo

gy in

cha

r are

a 50

%

3,52

8 3,

528

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Inte

grat

ed a

gric

ultu

ral d

evel

opm

ent p

roje

ct fo

r Mag

ura-

Jess

ore-

Nar

ail- K

huln

a-Sa

tkhi

ra (B

AR

I pa

rt)10

0%

1,99

4 1,

994

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Stre

ngth

enin

g of

env

ironm

enta

l stre

ss re

sear

ch fo

r sus

tain

able

cro

p pr

oduc

tion

in th

e pr

oble

m

area

s of B

angl

ades

h 50

%

44,5

73

-44

,573

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Tech

nolo

gy d

evel

opm

ent a

nd d

isse

min

atio

n of

hom

este

ad a

nd fi

eld

crop

s in

char

are

as fo

r in

com

e ge

nera

tion

and

pove

rty a

llevi

atio

n 10

0%

1,48

1 1,

481

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Upg

radi

ng re

gion

al h

ortic

ultu

re re

sear

ch st

atio

n, c

omill

a to

regi

onal

agr

icul

ture

rese

arch

stat

ion

100%

2,

489

2,48

9 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

B

RR

I02

%001

IR

RB fo kro

w hcraes er esae rcnI,9

44

20,9

44

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DA

E

Esta

blis

hmen

t of F

arm

ers s

ervi

ce c

ente

r an d

tech

nolo

gy e

xpan

sion

at u

pazi

la le

vel

100%

4,

386

4,38

6 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

St

reng

then

ing

dive

rsifi

ed c

rop

prod

uctio

n by

clim

ate

smar

t agr

icul

ture

syst

em

50%

40

,550

-

40,5

50

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

St

reng

then

ing

mus

hroo

m d

evel

opm

ent p

roje

ct

100%

7,

750

-7,

750

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

I.1

.2. D

evel

op te

chno

logi

es in

clud

ing

biot

echn

olog

ies a

nd m

easu

res t

o ad

apt a

gric

ultu

ral

syst

ems t

o cl

imat

e ch

ange

11

0,80

5 7,

455

103,

351

BA

RC

ev itisnes-noi tirt un 00 5, 7

- 005,7

% 05

yt ica pac C

RA

B gnineh tgne rtS BA

RI

Stre

ngth

enin

g of

env

ironm

enta

l stre

ss re

sear

ch fo

r sus

tain

able

cro

p pr

oduc

tion

in th

e pr

oble

m

area

s of B

angl

ades

h 50

%

44,5

73

-44

,573

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

BW

DB

e vit isnes -n oitirtun

111 -

111

%22 ) P

MW

ASC( tc ejorP tn e

meg an aM re ta

W e ru tl ucirgA tra

mS et amil

C DA

E

Dev

elop

men

t of a

gric

ultu

re w

eath

er sy

stem

pro

ject

10

0%

12,8

31

2,21

5 10

,616

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Stre

ngth

enin

g di

vers

ified

cro

p pr

oduc

tion

by c

limat

e sm

art a

gric

ultu

re sy

stem

50

%

40,5

50

-40

,550

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DA

MIn

tegr

ated

Pro

ject

for E

nviro

nmen

tal F

riend

ly S

usta

inab

le A

gric

ultu

re in

Hill

y A

reas

of

Ban

glad

esh

(DA

M)

100%

5,

240

5,24

0 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

thes

e su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

al

By G

oB

By

DPs

I.1

.3. I

mpr

ove

and

expa

nd n

utri

tion-

sens

itive

ext

ensi

on p

rogr

amm

es a

nd a

gric

ultu

ral

advi

sory

serv

ices

97

,475

11

,255

86

,220

BA

RI

- 825, 3

825,3

%05 aera rahc n i yg olonhc et porc fo no isn apx e dna hcrae ser po rc

mr af ecnahnEnu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DA

E

Exte

nsio

n of

Gra

nula

r Ure

a Te

chno

logy

Pro

ject

10

0%

10,4

13

-10

,413

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

GIS

bas

e cr

op m

onito

ring

and

area

wis

e ag

ricul

ture

ext

ensi

on se

rvic

e pr

ojec

t 10

0%

14,5

00

-14

,500

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Ran

gpur

div

isio

n ag

ricul

ture

and

rura

l dev

elop

men

t pro

ject

10

0%

42,0

13

5,79

4 36

,220

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DA

MM

agur

a-Je

ssor

-Nar

ial-K

huln

a-Sa

tkhi

ra In

tegr

ated

Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t Pro

jec t

100%

1,93

31,

933

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

veM

oFL

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Live

stoc

k D

evel

opm

ent b

ased

Dai

ry a

nd M

eat P

rodu

ctio

n Pr

ojec

t (LD

DM

PP)

6%

25,0

88

-25

,088

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

I.2. I

mpr

oved

acc

ess,

qual

ity a

nd m

anag

emen

t of a

gric

ultu

ral i

nput

s, in

clud

ing

wat

er

and

land

98

0,66

3 22

1,49

7 75

9,16

6

I.2.1

. Enh

ance

ava

ilabi

lity

and

effic

ient

use

of a

ffor

dabl

e an

d qu

ality

inpu

ts (s

eeds

,

s porc d eifisr evid dna efa s r of t iderc dn a )sedicitsep , sre si litref83

5,39

6 20

5,65

3 62

9,74

3

BA

RI


733,1 733,1

%001

hs ed alg naB ni tne

mpoleved d na hcraeser tsep eta rbe treV fo gni neht gnertS B

CIC

Setti

ng u

p of

a M

oder

n, e

nerg

y ef

ficie

nt w

ith h

ighe

r cap

acity

ure

a fe

rtiliz

er fa

ctor

y in

the

vaca

nt

land

of U

FFL

& P

UFF

L 10

0%

800,

000

200,

000

600,

000

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

BM

DA


689 689

%001

A

DM

B fo yticapac g nicudorp dees gnicna hnE DA

E

Esta

blis

hmen

t and

Enh

ance

men

t of P

estic

ide

labo

rato

ry

100%

5,09

9-

5,09

9nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

veD

AM

Ensu

ring

Sust

aina

ble

Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t thr

ough

Acc

ess o

f Mar

ket a

nd F

inan

ce

50%

5,

960

280

5,68

0 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

PDB

F Er

adic

atin

g po

verty

by

Supp

ortin

g Sm

all a

nd m

argi

nal f

arm

ers i

n af

ter c

rop

harv

estin

g pe

riod

50%

3,

050

3,05

0 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

SC

A

e vitis ne s-n oitir tu n 36 0,41

- 3 60 ,41

%0 01

n oit acifitr ec dee s fo t cejorp n oitav onnI SFD

F C

apac

ity B

uild

ing

of th

e Sm

all F

arm

ers D

evel

opm

ent F

ound

atio

n 50

%

1,99

6 -

1,99

6 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Prod

uctio

n, E

mpl

oym

ent a

nd In

com

e G

ener

atio

n Pr

ogra

mm

e fo

r the

Sm

all F

arm

ers o

f B

angl

ades

h 10

0%

2,90

5 -

2,90

5 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

I.2.3

. Im

prov

e w

ater

man

agem

ent t

hrou

gh c

onse

rvat

ion,

sust

aina

ble

extr

actio

n an

d di

stri

butio

n of

gro

und

wat

er

and

effic

ient

use

of s

urfa

ce w

ater

for

irri

gatio

n 14

5,26

7 15

,844

12

9,42

3

BM

DA

Cha

r liv

elih

ood

impr

ovem

ent b

y so

lar i

rrig

atio

n, c

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

ATS

AN

dev

elop

men

t pr

ojec

t 33

%

66

- 66

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti


- 447,4

447,4

%001 noitagirri ssel hti

w porc ecud orp ot aera dnir ob ni ll ew

wollahs g niggiD B

WD

B

Clim

ate

Smar

t Agr

icul

ture

Wat

er M

anag

emen

t Pro

ject

(CSA

WM

P)

60%

30

3 -

303

nutri

tion-

sens

itive


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

thes

e su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

al

By

GoB

By

DPs

N

orth

Raj

shah

i Irr

igat

ion

Proj

ect

100%

11

0,05

4 -

110,

054

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

L

GE

D

e vi tr op pus- noitir tun 00 0, 7

0 00 ,01 0 00 ,71

%00 1

tcejorp tnempo lev ed sec ru os er r eta

w ela cs -l lams evisneherp

moC C

onst

ruct

ion

of R

ubbe

r Dam

s in

Smal

l & M

ediu

m R

iver

s for

incr

easi

ng F

ood

Prod

uctio

n10

0%13

,100

1,10

012

,000

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

eI.3

. Enh

ance

d pr

oduc

tivity

and

sust

aina

ble

prod

ucti

0 55,5 42 782,1 41

63 8,683 sd oo f ecru os la

min a fo noI.3

.1. I

mpr

ove

man

agem

ent o

f fish

erie

s, liv

esto

ck a

nd p

oultr

y to

incr

ease

pro

duct

ion

and

prod

uctiv

ity a

nd

nutr

ition

al v

alue

whi

le e

nsur

ing

sust

aina

bilit

y 72

,934

69

,954

2,

981

BFR

IH

ilsha

rese

arch

enh

ance

men

t in

chan

dpur

rive

r cen

ter

evi tisne s-noitirtun-

453,3453,3

%001

BL

RI

Dai

ry d

evel

opm

ent a

nd re

sear

ch

100%

2,

327

2,32

7 -

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f dai

ry re

sear

ch d

evel

opm

ent c

ente

r pro

ject

10

0%

6,25

9 6,

259

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

BR

RI

evitis nes- noit irtu n 2 16,2

617 823,3

%00 1

tcejorp gni neht gnerts yti capac hc raeser ec ir dirbyH D

LS

Esta

blis

hmen

t of L

ives

tock

pro

duct

ion

and

qual

ity c

ontro

l res

earc

h 10

0%

6,61

3 6,

613

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

Khu

lna

regi

onal

live

stoc

k de

velo

pmen

t pro

ject

10

0%

8,14

8 8,

148

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DoF

ev iti snes -noi ti rt un -

0 68,8 0 68,8

%001

tce jo rp eros seJ retaer g ni t nemp oleved se ire hs iF Fi

sher

ies d

evel

opm

ent p

roje

ct in

gre

ater

Jess

ore


214,3 214,3

%001

tcirtsi d evitisnes-noiti rtun

963 892,62

766,62

%71 r otce S se ir ehsiF ni t ne

mpoleveD n iah

C eulaV d na tne

meganaM elb an iat suS PD

BF

Ree

xcav

atio

n of

pon

ds a

nd fi

sh c

ultu

re a

fter j

ute

deco

mpo

sitio

n 10

0%

3,96

7 3,

967

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

I.3.2

. Sus

tain

mic

ronu

trie

nt-r

ich

anim

al fo

od p

rodu

ctio

n th

roug

h co

nser

ving

fish

erie

s and

liv

esto

ck b

iodi

vers

ity

BL

RI


884,2 884,2

%001

)es ahp dn2( noitavresnoc dna tnempoleve d elttac de

R DoF

Sust

aina

ble

Man

agem

ent a

nd V

alue

Cha

in D

evel

opm

ent i

n Fi

sher

ies S

ecto

r 17

%

26,6

67

26,2

98

369

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

I.3

.3. S

tren

gthe

n su

stai

nabl

e sh

rim

p aq

uacu

lture

, mar

ine

fishe

ries

and

farm

ing

syst

ems

adap

ted

to g

eogr

aphi

cal z

ones

17

5,77

1 42

,546

13

3,22

5

BFR

IEs

tabl

ishi

ng H

aor F

ishe

ries R

esea

rch

Stat

ion

in K

isho

rega

nj a

nd B

eel F

ishe

ries R

esea

rch

Stat

ion

in G

opal

ganj

10

0%

16,2

48

16,2

48

- nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

DoF

Sust

aina

ble

Man

agem

ent a

nd V

alue

Cha

in D

evel

opm

ent i

n Fi

sher

ies S

ecto

r 17

%

26,6

67

26,2

98

369

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

Te

chni

cal S

uppo

rt St

ock

Ass

essm

ent o

f Mar

ine

Fish

erie

s Res

ourc

es in

Ban

glad

esh

100%

27

1 -

271

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

M

oFis

h e vi tis nes -n oit irt un

585,2 31 -

585,23 1

%001 h sedalg na

B ni seirehsif eni ram d na latsa o

C e lb an iat suS I.3.4

. Im

prov

e fis

heri

es, l

ives

tock

and

pou

ltry

heal

th se

rvic

es, q

ualit

y in

puts

and

su

rvei

llanc

e

108,

976

- 10

8,97

6

MoF

L

evitisnes-noitirtun679,801

-679,801

%82)P P

MD

DL( tcejorP noitcudo rP taeM dna yria

D des ab tnempoleve

D kcots eviL I. D

iver

sifie

d an

d su

stai

nabl

e ag

ricu

lture

, fis

heri

es a

nd li

vest

ock

for

heal

thy

diet

s Tot

al

1,71

0,97

6 41

6,31

5 1,

294,

660


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

thes

e su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

al

By

GoB

B

y D

Ps

II.1

. Str

engt

hene

d po

st-h

arve

st v

alue

cha

in w

ith p

artic

ular

focu

s on

MSM

Es (

stor

age,

)edart d na g nitekr am ,g nil leba l ,gnidn arb ,gnissecorp

300,

910

91,0

11

209,

898

II.1

.1.D

evel

op sk

ills a

nd st

reng

then

cap

acity

to p

roce

ss a

nd su

pply

safe

and

nut

rien

t-ri

ch fo

ods w

ith e

mph

asis

on

qual

ity st

anda

rds a

nd n

utri

ent l

abel

ling

info

rmat

ion

31,8

37

- 31

,837

DA

MA

gric

ultu

ral M

arke

ting

Serv

ices

Ext

ensi

on Q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

syst

em a

nd v

alue

cha

in

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

10

0%

1,50

0 -

1,50

0 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Impr

ovin

g M

arke

ting

effic

ienc

y th

roug

h va

lue

chai

n lin

kage

in

0 0,1

%0 01 stc irtsi d detc el es 60

0 -

1,00

0 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

DL

SM

ilk d

evel

opm

ent a

nd m

arke

ting

proj

ect

100%

14

,245

-

14,2

45

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e M

oA

Smal

lhol

der A

gric

ultu

ral C

ompe

titiv

en 290,51

- 290,51

%03

tcejo rP ssenu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

II.1

.2. A

dopt

app

ropr

iate

tech

nolo

gy a

nd st

reng

then

infr

astr

uctu

re to

allo

w q

ualit

y

sdoof f o noitacifit rof d na noitidda e ulav ,t neme vo rp

mi21

4,00

2 80

,825

13

3,17

7

DA

MEn

surin

g Fo

od S

ecur

ity th

roug

h En

hanc

ing

Val

ue A

dditi

on a

nd P

roce

ssin

g A

ctiv

ities

of

Agr

icul

tura

l Com

mod

ities

in 1

0 Se

lect

ed D

istri

cts.

100%

99

0 -

990

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

Impr

ovin

g lo

cal l

evel

food

secu

rity

thro

ugh

enha

ncin

g va

lue

addi

tion

and

proc

essi

ng a

ctiv

ities

of

agric

ultu

ral c

omm

oditi

es in

sele

cted

20

dist

ricts

10

0%

10,0

20

430

9,59

0 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

DL

SEs

tabl

ishm

ent o

f Sla

ught

e r H

ouse

at U

pazi

la le

vel

50%

5,

940

-5,

940

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e D

oF ev itro pp us-no itir tun

601,1 598,87

00 0, 08

%0 5 rot ceS s eire hsiF ni tn e

mpo le veD niah

C eul aV dna tne

meg an aM elb an iats uS M

ilk V

ita

Esta

blis

hmen

t of M

ilk P

lant

for E

nhan

cing

Milk

Pro

duct

ion

at P

atiy

a, C

hitta

gonj

10

0%

2,00

0 1,

500

500

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e M

oASm

allh

olde

r Agr

icul

tura

l Com

pe -

290,5 1

% 03 tcej orP ssenev itit

15,0

92

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e M

oFL

Li

vest

ock

Dev

elop

men

t bas

ed D

airy

and

Mea

t Pro

duct

ion

Proj

ect (

LDD

MPP

) 26

%

99,9

60

-99

,960

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

II.1

.3. M

obili

se a

nd p

rom

ote

prod

ucer

and

mar

ketin

g gr

oups

for

impr

oved

mar

ket a

cces

s and

bar

gain

ing

pow

er,

espe

cial

ly fo

r w

omen

and

smal

lhol

ders

55

,071

10

,187

44

,884

DO

CD

evel

opm

ent o

f coo

pera

tives

bas

ed d

irect

mar

ketin

g sy

stem

of a

gric

ultu

ral p

rodu

cts

100%

4,

163

4,16

3 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e Ex

tens

ion

of d

airy

coo

pera

tive

in g

anga

sora

upa

zila

to c

reat

e em

ploy

men

t, m

ilk a

nd m

eat

prod

uctio

n 10

0%

2,38

9 2,

389

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive evitr opp us-noitir tu n

- 5 36,3

536,3

%00 1 sevitarepoo

C hg uo rh t yt inum

moC su one gid nI eht f o tne

mev o rpm I d oohile viL M

oASm

allh

olde

r Agr

icul

tura

l Com

petit

iven

ess P

roje

ct

39%

19

,796

-

19,7

96

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e M

oFL

ev itr oppus -noitir tun

880 ,52 -

880,5 2

%6 )P P

MD

DL ( tcejor P noi tc udor P taeM dna yri a

D de sa b t nem polev e

D kcotsev iL 514,78

912,985 436,676

no itamrof ni d na seitilica f ,stekra

m ot ss ecc a devor pmI .2. II II

.2.1

. Im

prov

e m

arke

t inf

rast

ruct

ures

, phy

sical

acc

ess t

o m

arke

t fac

ilitie

s 641,7 1

918,885 569, 506


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

thes

e su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

al

By

GoB

B

y D

Ps

BM

DA

Cha

r liv

elih

ood

impr

ovem

ent b

y so

lar i

rrig

atio

n, c

omm

unic

atio

n an

d W

ATS

AN

dev

elop

men

t pr

ojec

t 33

%

66

- 66

nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

DA

MA

gric

ultu

ral M

arke

ting

Infr

astru

ctur

e A

nd c

rop

stor

age-

base

d cr

edit

expa

nsio

n D

evel

opm

ent

Proj

ect

100%

15

,000

15

,000

-

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

Ensu

ring

Sust

aina

ble

Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t thr

ough

Acc

ess o

f Mar

ket a

nd F

inan

ce

50%

5,

960

280

5,68

0 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

Ensu

ring

Sust

aina

ble

Agr

icul

tura

l Dev

elop

men

t thr

ough

Mar

ket a

cces

s 10

0%

12,0

00

600

11,4

00

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e L

GE

D


848,14 848,14

%001

tnemp ol eved e rutcu rtsa rfn I la ru

R ecn eilis er etamil

C evit ro ppus-noitirtun

- 6 76 ,2 93

6 76,293

%0 01 s dao

R laruR ni noitc urtsn oc eg di r

B tn atropmI

evitroppus-noiti rtun -

264,54 264,54

%001

aliZ alohB :tne

mpole veD e rut curtsa rfnI lar u

R t natropmI

ev itr op pus-noit irtu n -

0 73 ,62 0 73 ,6 2

%0 01

n oi si viD a nlu h

K :tnem pole ve

D e rutcurtsa rfnI lar uR t natrop

mIevitroppus-noitirtun

-437,4

43 7,4%001

tcirtsid anok or teN ni jnognah o

M d na a raptaA n i tne

mpoleved erutcurtsarfnI la ruR

evit ro ppus-no iti rt un -

790,2 79 0, 2

%0 01

jnogn ay araN fo ali zapu r azahiar

A ni tnempolev ed er ut curts arfnI la ru

R Rur

al In

fras

truct

ure

deve

lopm

ent i

n G

ourn

adi a

nd A

gaijh

evi tr op pus -noitirtun -

003 ,2 003,2

%0 01

la siraB fo a ra


922,2 922,2

%001

r up lamaJ fo rup

malsI ni tnempol ev ed erutcu rts arfnI laru

R evi tropp us-noitirtun

- 188, 83

188,8 3

%001 aliz r upre hS dna rupla

m aJ ni tnempol eved erutcurtsarfnI laru

R Rur

al In

fras

truct

ure

deve

lopm

ent i

n N

anda

il up

azila

of M

y 894,2

%001

tcirtsid hgnisnem

2,49

8 -

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e R

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e de

velo

pmen

t in

Sout

h Sa

dar a

nd L

ango

lkot

upa

zila

in C

o evitroppus-no itirtun

- 794,4

794,4

%001 alli

mR

ural

Infr

astru

ctur

e de

velo

pmen

t in

Sout

h Su

nam

gonj

, Jag

anna

thpu

r upa

zila

of S

unam

gonj

10

0%

4,56

9 4,

569

- nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive evitroppus-noitirtun

- 321,2

321,2

%001 akah

D fo a lizapu jno gb awo

N dna rahoD ni tne

mpoleved daoR laru

R e vitr opp us -n oitir tu n

- 55 6,2

55 6,2

% 00 1 no agoa

N fo ta ahr ioma h

D d na alotinto P ni tnempole ve d dao

R laruR

046,66 -

046,66 spihsrentrap cilb up-etavirp dna noitap icitrap rotc es etavirp nehtgnertS .2. 2.I I M

oFL

evitroppus-noitirtun

046,66 -

046,66

%71 )PP

MD

DL( tcejorP n oitcudorP taeM dna y ri a

D desab tnemp ole ve

D k cotseviL 926,3

00 4 9 20,4

seitilica f T

CI fo tnem hs ilba tse eht gnidu lcn i n oitani

me ssid no itamr ofni pu- ela cS .3 .2.I I D

AM

Esta

blis

hmen

t of A

gric

ultu

ral s

yste

m evitroppus-noitirtun

926,3 004

920,4

%001 sertnec dna no ita

mro fni ,tekram ,

II. E

ffic

ient

and

nut

ritio

n-se

nsiti

ve p

ost-

harv

est t

rans

form

atio

n an

d va

lue

addi

tion

Tot

al

977,

544

680,

230

297,

314

III.1

. Enh

ance

d nu

triti

on k

now

ledg

e, p

rom

otio

n of

goo

d pr

actic

es, a

nd c

onsu

mpt

ion

of sa

fe

and

nutr

itiou

s die

ts

42,1

81

382

41,7

99

III.1

.1 S

cale

up

nutr

ition

trai

ning

, beh

avio

ur c

hang

e co

mm

unic

atio

ns (B

CC

) for

enh

ance

d kn

owle

dge,

safe

stor

age,

ho

useh

old

proc

essin

g an

d im

prov

ed c

onsu

mpt

ion

25,7

38

105

25,6

32

MoF

L

evitisn es-noitirtun 299,91

- 299,91

% 5

) PPM

DDL( tc ejor P noi tcudorP tae

M dn a yriaD desab tn e

mp ole veD kco tseviL M

OH

FMN

NSA

11 -

Dev

elop

& U

pdat

e SB

CC

mat

eria

ls

100%

87

-

87

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

+

NN

SA11

- Pr

intin

g of

IEC

mat

eria

ls, b

ulle

tin, t

rain

ing

mod

ules

& g

uide

lines

,pos

ter/f

esto

on,

reco

rdin

g &

repo

rting

tool

s etc

. 10

0%

1,00

0 90

910

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

+

NN

SA11

- SB

CC

Coo

rdin

atio

n, E

-tool

kit &

Web

site

(mai

nten

ance

& u

pdat

e)

100%

12

6 7

119

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

+

NN

SA11

-SB

CC

rela

ted

Cam

paig

n 10

0%

4,52

0 -

4,52

0 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve +

NN

SA3

- Upd

atin

g of

exi

stin

g tra

inin

g m

odul

e an

d ac

adem

ic c

urric

ulum

etc

. 10

0%

14

95

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

+


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

thes

e su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

al

By

GoB

B

y D

Ps

III.1

.2. P

reve

nt a

nd c

ontr

ol n

on-c

omm

unic

able

dis

ease

s (N

CD

s) a

nd e

nsur

e he

alth

y di

ets t

hrou

gh p

rom

otio

n of

di

etar

y gu

idel

ines

link

ed w

ith n

atio

nal N

CD

stra

tegi

es a

nd r

elat

ed n

utri

tion

serv

ices

30

30

-

DG

HS

NN

SA10

- D

ieta

ry g

uide

line

100%

30

30

-

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

+

III.1

.3. K

now

ledg

e ba

sed

tool

s and

res

earc

h on

the

deve

lopm

ent a

nd p

rom

otio

n of

nut

rien

t den

se r

ecip

es u

sing

loca

l fo

ods f

or e

nhan

cing

div

ersi

fied

food

con

sum

ptio

nto

redu

ce st

untin

g, w

astin

g an

d m

icro

nutr

ient

def

icie

ncie

s 16

,414

24

7 16

,167

MoA

Smal

lhol

der A

gric

ultu

ral C

o 089

%2

t cejor P s sen evitit epm

- 98

0 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

MoF

L

Live

stoc

k D

evel

opm

ent b

ased

Dai

ry a

nd M

eat P

rodu

ctio

n Pr

ojec

t (LD

DM

PP)

3%

13,3

28

-13

,328

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

MO

HFM

+ evitisnes-noitirtun 32

- 32

%001

ledom el ifo rp tne ir tu

N - 0 1AS

NN

+ evi tisne s-n oitirt un 54

02 56

% 001

noit irtun tnecs eloda no se vitatn es erper tne duts dn a sr eh ca et r of gnini arT - 3AS

NN D

GH

SN

NSA

1 - B

aby

Frie

ndly

Hos

pita

l Ini

tiativ

e (B

FHI)

10

0%

1,15

5 22

2 93

3 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve +

N

NSA

1 - O

rient

atio

n Pr

ogra

m o

nIY

CF

incl

udin

g H

ome

forti

ficat

ion

100%

810

-81

0nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve +

NN

SA1

- Upd

ate

Nat

iona

l IY

CF

Stra

tegy

10

0%

54

549

nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve +

II

I.2. O

ptim

ised

food

util

isat

ion

thro

ugh

prov

isio

n of

safe

wat

er, i

mpr

oved

food

hyg

iene

an

d sa

nita

tion

71

5

66

III.2

.1. S

cale

up

the

supp

ly o

f saf

e w

ater

for

cons

umpt

evitisnes -no itir tun 66

- 66

%33

esu cit sem od dna noi

BM

DA

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

eC

har l

ivel

ihoo

d im

prov

emen

t by

sola

r irr

igat

ion,

com

mun

icat

ion

and

WA

TSA

N d

evel

opm

ent

proj

ect

33%

66

-

66

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

III.2

.2. E

nsur

e hy

gien

ic fo

od h

andl

ing,

pre

para

tion

and

serv

ices

, and

scal

e-up

han

d w

ashi

ng b

ehav

iour

5

5 -

MO

HFM

e vitis ne s-noitirtun -

5 5

%0 01

sla iretam n oitacin u

mm oc P

MG dn a P

HG fo tne

mp ol eved n o po hsk roW - 2

BSN

N III.

Impr

oved

die

tary

div

ersi

ty, c

onsu

mpt

ion

and

utili

satio

n T

otal

42

,252

38

7 41

,865

IV

.1. T

imel

y an

d ef

fect

ive

disa

ster

pre

pare

dnes

s and

res

pons

es th

roug

h em

erge

ncy

food

dis

trib

utio

n, st

eps t

owar

ds

agri

cultu

ral s

ecto

r re

habi

litat

ion

and

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

632

- 63

2

IV.1

.1.In

crea

se th

e re

silie

nce

of a

gric

ultu

ral s

yste

ms,

incl

udin

g th

e pr

oduc

tion

of d

isas

ter-

resi

lient

nut

ritio

us c

rops

es

peci

ally

by

vuln

erab

le p

opul

atio

ns

91

- 91

BW

DB

evitisnes-noitirtun

19 -

19

%81 )P

MW

ASC( t cejorP tne

megan aM reta

W erutluci rgA tra

m S etamil

C IV.1

.2. E

nsur

e so

cial

and

eco

nom

ic a

cces

s to

food

for

the

poor

est s

ectio

ns o

f the

pop

ulat

ion

rets asid yb detce ffa ts o

m saer a ni dna s isir c fo semit ni

541

- 54

1

MO

HFM

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e evi tisnes -noit irtu n 1 45

- 14 5

%0 01

)es ab deeN( s eil ppus yc ne gre

mE - 7A S

NN IV

.2. S

tren

gthe

ned

cash

and

food

-bas

ed p

rogr

amm

es fo

r ta

rget

ed g

roup

s acr

oss t

he li

fe

sn oital upo p dec alps id dna delbasid gnidulcn i elcyc

42,6

31

27,9

68

14,6

62

IV.2

.1. E

xpan

d an

d st

reng

then

safe

ty n

et p

rogr

amm

es a

cros

s the

life

cyc

le su

ppor

ting

vuln

erab

le g

roup

s suc

h as

po

or w

omen

, chi

ldre

n, th

e el

derl

y, d

isabl

ed p

eopl

e an

d di

spla

ced

popu

latio

ns

35,2

28

27,6

68

7,56

0


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

thes

e su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

al

By

GoB

B

y D

Ps

DO

C evitisnes-noitirtun

- 751,51

751,51

%001 s

woc gni raer yb n emo

w degatna vdasid f o tn emev orp

mi d oo hi leviL e vitisnes-n oitirt un

- 1 64 ,9

1 64, 9

% 001 n e

mow de gatna vd asid eht fo tn e

mev orpm i d oohilevi L PD

BF

Erad

icat

ing

pove

rty b

y Su

ppor

ting

Smal

l and

mar

gina

l far

mer

s in

afte

r cro

p ha

rves

ting

perio

d 50

%

3,05

0 3,

050

-nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

SFD

F e vitisnes-n oit ir tun

899 -

899

% 52 n oitadnu oF tne

mpol eveD sre

mraF llam S eht fo gnid liu

B yticapaC

ev i tisn es- no itir tu n 26 5, 6

- 26 5,6

%00 1

n oita lup oP l anigr aM dn a cinht E fo tne

me vorpmI do ohile viL IV

.2.2

. Exp

and

and

stre

ngth

en p

rogr

amm

es fo

r su

ppor

ting

peop

le li

ving

in v

ulne

rabl

e an

d di

sadv

anta

ged

area

s (c

har

land

, riv

er b

ank,

hao

rs, h

ill tr

acts

and

urb

an a

reas

) 7,

300

300

7,00

0

RD

AEn

hanc

emen

t of C

oast

al L

ivel

ihoo

d th

roug

h Sm

all a

nd M

ediu

m E

nter

pris

e (S

ME)

Dev

elop

men

t 10

0%

6,30

2 30

0 6,

002

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

SFD

F C

apac

ity B

uild

ing

of th

e Sm

all F

arm

ers D

evel

opm

ent F

ound

atio

n 25

%

998

-99

8 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

IV.2

.3. I

ntro

duce

nut

ritio

n se

nsiti

ve so

cial

safe

ty n

et p

rogr

amm

es (S

SNP)

incl

udin

g fo

od

nerdlihc dna srehto

m rof yllai cep se noitacifitrof10

2 -

102

MO

HFM

NN

SC2

- Dis

trict

orie

ntat

ion

wor

ksho

p on

food

forti

ficat

ion

for S

uper

visi

on &

mon

itorin

g am

ong

dist

rict/u

pazi

la le

vel r

espe

ctiv

e pe

rson

nel

100%

10

2 -

102

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

IV. E

nhan

ced

acce

ss to

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n an

d sa

fety

net

s and

incr

ease

d re

silie

nce

Tot

al

43,2

62

27,9

68

15,2

94

V.1

. Im

prov

ed fo

od sa

fety

, qua

lity

cont

rol a

nd a

ssur

ance

, aw

aren

ess o

n fo

od sa

fety

and

hy

gien

e55

,475

53

5 54

,940

V.1

.1. E

nsur

e co

nfor

mity

of f

oods

for

cons

umpt

ion

thro

ugh

accr

edita

tion

from

cer

tific

atio

n

secivre s yr otarob al dn a noitce psn i , seic nega21

,244

23

0 21

,014

MoF

L

evitisn es-noi ti rtu n 232 ,8

- 232,8

%2

) PPM

DDL ( tc ejorP no itcudor P tae

M dn a yri aD d es ab tne

mpoleveD kcot seviL M

oFoo

d Es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f 7 fo

od la

bora

torie

s in

seve

n di

visi

on

100%

10

,000

-

10,0

00

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

M

OH

FMnu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

NN

SB1

- Foo

d-bo

rne

illne

ss

evitis ne s-no iti rtun 363

51 873

%001

ecn allie vrus evitisnes-noiti rtun

13 1,1 511

642,1

%001 :d ooF fo s isyla n

A yr ota robaL - 1BS

NN

e viti sn es- no iti rtun 8 82,1

0 01 8 83,1

%001

noi tcepsn I do oF desaB ksi

R - 1BS

NN V

.1.2

. Int

rodu

ce a

nd p

opul

ariz

e G

ood

Agr

icul

tura

l Pra

ctic

es, G

ood

Aqu

acul

tura

l Pra

ctic

es a

nd G

ood

Hus

band

ry

Prac

tices

that

ens

ure

food

safe

ty a

nd q

ualit

y 8,

232

- 8,

232

MoF

L


- 232,8

%2

) PPM

DDL( tcejorP noitcudo rP tae

M dn a y riaD desab tne

mpoleveD kco tseviL V

.1.3

. Int

rodu

ce a

nd sc

ale-

up g

ood

man

ufac

turi

ng p

ract

ices

(GM

P) a

nd g

ood

hygi

enic

pr

actic

es (G

HP)

incl

udin

g ad

here

nce

to H

azar

d A

naly

sis a

nd C

ritic

al C

ontr

ol P

oint

s (H

AC

CP)

com

plia

nce

152%

15

,323

98

15

,226

nu

triti

on-s

ensi

tive

DL

SEs

tabl

ishm

ent o

f Sla

ught

er H

o evitis nes-noit irtun

049,5 -

0 49,5

%05 le ve l aliz ap

U ta e suM

oFL

Li

vest

ock

Dev

elop

men

t bas

ed D

airy

and

Mea

t Pro

duct

ion

Proj

ect (

LDD

MPP

) 2%

8,

232

-8,

232

nutri

tion-

sens

itive


Proj

ects

Po

rtio

n of

the

proj

ect

allo

cate

d un

der

thes

e su

b-pr

ogra

mm

es

Fund

allo

cate

d fo

r th

e du

ratio

n of

the

CIP

2 T

ype

of p

roje

ct

Tot

al

By

GoB

B

y D

Ps

MO

HFM

evitisn es -noi tirtun 014

84 854

%05

yt efaS dooF no C

CB/

CEI - 2BS

NN

evitisnes-noitirtun 446

05 496

%05

no itcep snI d ooF d esaB ksi

R - 2BS

NN V

.1.4

. Enh

ance

food

safe

ty e

duca

tion,

con

sum

er a

war

enes

s and

food

safe

ty n

etw

orks

30

2%

10,6

76

208

10,4

69

nutr

ition

-sen

sitiv

e M

oFL

evitisnes -noitirtun

2 32,8 -

2 32, 8

% 2 ) PP

MD

DL( tc ej orP noi tcudorP taeM dna yri a

D d es ab t nemp ole ve

D kcotseviL MO

HFM

NN

SB1

- IEC

/BC

C o

n Fo

od S

afet

y 10

0%

915

9582

0 nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

ve

NN

SB2

- Foo

d-bo

rne

illne

ss su

rvei

llanc

e

100%

378

1536

3nu

tritio

n-se

nsiti

veN

NSB

2 - I

EC/B

CC

on

Food

Saf

ety

50%

45

8 48

410

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

N

NSB

2 - R

isk

Bas

ed F

ood

Insp

ectio

n

50%

69

4 50

644

nutri

tion-

sens

itive

V

.3. I

mpr

oved

info

rmat

ion

and

data

for

evid

ence

-bas

ed m

onito

ring

and

adj

ustm

ent o

f po

licie

s and

pro

gram

mes

98

0 -

980

V.3

.1.P

rodu

ce m

ore

relia

ble

and

timel

y FN

S in

form

atio

n an

d da

ta th

roug

h im

prov

ed in

form

atio

n in

fras

truc

ture

s, en

hanc

ed c

oord

inat

ion

in d

ata

colle

ctio

n an

d da

ta e

xcha

nge

to im

prov

e ev

iden

ce-b

ased

dec

isio

n m

akin

g, p

olic

y fo

rmul

atio

n an

d pr

ogra

mm

ing

980

- 98

0

DA

MSt

reng

then

ing

capa

city

bui

ldin

g of

dep

artm

ent o

f agr

icul

tura

l mar

ketin

g (D

AM

) in

rese

arch

and

po

licy

anal

ysis

of a

gric

ultu

re m

arke

ting

info

rmat

ion

100%

98

0 -

980

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

V.4

. Im

prov

ed F

NS

gove

rnan

ce, c

apac

ity st

reng

then

ing

and

lead

ersh

ip a

cros

s FN

S re

leva

nt

stak

ehol

ders

20

0%

14,4

00

30

14,3

70

nutr

ition

-sup

port

ive

V.4

.1.S

tren

gthe

n ex

istin

g na

tiona

l coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

s lia

isin

g w

ith e

xist

ing

FNS

fram

ewor

ks, c

lust

ers a

nd n

etw

orks

incl

udin

g th

e SU

N in

itiat

ive

and

netw

orks

wor

king

to

war

ds in

tegr

atin

g th

e R

ight

to F

ood

to th

e C

onst

itutio

n 50

%

250

15

235

nutr

ition

-sup

port

ive

MO

HFM

NN

SC1

- Rev

italiz

atio

n &

ope

ratio

n (I

nter

-min

iste

rial &

mul

tisec

tora

l coo

rdin

atio

n) o

f BN

NC

(a.

Rev

italiz

e B

NN

Can

d in

stitu

tiona

lize

at a

ll le

vel,

b. R

evis

e N

atio

nal M

onito

ring

and

Surv

eilla

nce

tool

s, c.

Est

ablis

h C

oord

inat

ion

Com

mitt

ee a

t dis

trict

and

upa

zila

leve

l, d.

Res

earc

h A

ctiv

ities

, Po

licy

anal

ysis

, kno

wle

dge

man

agem

ent,

Nut

ritio

n se

min

ar a

nd N

atio

nal N

utrit

ion

Wee

k &

e.

Bui

ld C

apac

ity, d

evel

op n

etw

ork

with

Glo

bal f

orum

s and

mob

ilize

reso

urce

s for

BN

NC

)

50%

25

0 15

23

5 nu

tritio

n-su

ppor

tive

V.4

.2. S

tren

gthe

n ca

paci

ties t

o de

sign

and

mon

itor

the

new

Foo

d an

d N

utri

tion

Secu

rity

2PIC eht et anidr ooc dna rotino

m ,tnemelp

mi dna yciloP14

,150

15

14

,135

MoF

ood

evitroppus-noitirtun 009,31

- 009,31

%001

mar go rP e gne lla h

C t nemhsiru on redn

U e ht g nite eM M

OH

FMN

NSC

1 - R

evita

lizat

ion

& o

pera

tion

(Int

er-m

inis

teria

l & m

ultis

ecto

ral c

oord

inat

ion)

of B

NN

C (a

. R

evita

lize

BN

NC

and

inst

itutio

naliz

e at

all

leve

l, b.

Rev

ise

Nat

iona

l Mon

itorin

g an

d Su

rvei

llanc

e to

ols,

c. E

stab

lish

Coo

rdin

atio

n C

omm

ittee

at d

istri

ct a

nd u

pazi

la le

vel,

d. R

esea

rch

Act

iviti

es,

Polic

y an

alys

is, k

now

ledg

e m

anag

emen

t, N

utrit

ion

sem

inar

and

Nat

iona

l Nut

ritio

n W

eek

& e

. B

uild

Cap

acity

, dev

elop

net

wor

k w

ith G

loba

l for

ums a

nd m

obili

ze re

sour

ces f

or B

NN

C)

50%

25

0 15

235

nutri

tion-

supp

ortiv

e

V. S

tren

gthe

ned

enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent a

nd c

ross

-cut

ting

prog

ram

mes

for

achi

evin

g fo

od

and

nutr

ition

secu

rity

Tot

al

70,8

55

565

70,2

90


RBM

CIP2Implementation

CIP2 Planning CIP2 monitoringand evaluation

Learning

Annex 6. Specifics of the CIP2 monitoring and evaluation process

Approach to CIP Monitoring

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is used to gauge the progress of programmes and projects in achieving expected results. It is also a tool that can identify bottlenecks in implementation and unintended effects. Effective M&E provides opportunities to:

- Increase ownership of results and maintain motivation by engaging CIP; - Demonstrate achievement of development result; - Support evidence-based decision-making; and - Highlight gaps for advocating resource mobilisation.

In accordance to the principles set in the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan in 2011, the CIP2 monitoring system builds on existing national M&E capacities. It also adopts a Results Based Management (RBM) approach. This broad management strategy aims to achieve demonstrable development results and improved performance. Good planning, followed by monitoring and evaluation can enhance the effectiveness of investment projects and plans by carefully allocating resources and assessing progress in order to identify initiatives that work and feeding this information back into the planning process (Figure 8). In the CIP2 monitoring system, CIP2 programmes are assessed against expected development results of the CIP2’s Results Framework. The yearly Monitoring Report describes and analyses these data. The feedback it provides to different stakeholders -GoB, DPs, CSOs, etc.- allows the contents of the CIP2 to be adjusted as needed.

In addition to this framework and in response to requests for elements to gauge the impact of an investment programme, such as the CIPl or CIP2, an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of five selected nutrition-sensitive sub-programmes of the CIP2 or specific activities/projects is planned. A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) approach will be adopted to this effect. This will help understand the potential impacts of these particular sub-programmes on achieving the objectives of corresponding key investment programmes. This is a first step towards an understanding of the CIP2’s effect on the country’s FNS outcomes and will lead the way to further evaluations.

Figure 8. CIP2 life cycle

Key questions addressed by CIP2 M&E are:

• Are the priority investment areas still relevant? • Are CIP2 programmes and sub-programmes contributing to NFP Goals and Outcomes? • Are inputs being mobilised as planned? • Do the delivered inputs continue to be relevant for the achievement of Programme Outputs? • What are the financing gaps? • What decisions need to be taken for improving CIP2 effectiveness? • What are the main challenges, risks and opportunities?


In order to answer these questions, the CIP2 M&E actions focus on three key dimensions: 1. Progress towards expected Outcomes 2. Progress towards expected Outputs 3. CIP Investment Project Performance (financial execution) and donor commitments in contributing

to the CIP2 programmes financing (Inputs). The monitoring exercise focuses on analysing CIP2 investment projects’ contribution to the achievement of expected Outputs and Outcomes, as measured through the proxy indicators provided in the CIP2 Results Framework. CIP2 monitoring starts from the input level of the results chain (Figure 9). Figure 9. CIP2 monitoring

CIP2 Monitoring & Evaluation plan

The CIP2 M&E plan is the key reference for conducting monitoring and evaluation activities systematically during the CIP2 life cycle (Table A6.1.). It defines what is to be monitored and evaluated; who is responsible for monitoring and evaluation activities; when monitoring and evaluation activities take place; and how monitoring and evaluation are carried out.

Table A6.1. CIP2 M&E plan

CIP2 result M&E action Focus Responsibilities Timing

Expected outcomes and outputs

CIP2 (and NFNSP Plan of Action to be formulated) annual monitoring report: CIP2 outcome and output monitoring

•

•

Progress towards CIP2 expected outcomes measured as % of results framework targets

Progress towards CIP2 expected programme outputs measured as % of variation of results framework baseline indicators

•

•

The TTs prepare this section of the monitoring report with technical support from FPMU

Once the new NFNSP and its Plan of Action are formulated, its monitoring and that of the CIP2 will be consolidated

The CIP2 (and later NFNSP PoA) monitoring report is produced on a yearly basis during the CIP2 life cycle


CIP2 result M&E action Focus Responsibilities Timing

Inputs CIP2 annual monitoring report: CIP2 investment projects’ budget execution

•

•

Reports on CIP2 investment projects’ budget execution performance including DPs’ disbursement

CIP2 new project activation

•

•

•

IMED provides financial execution information with details of DP spending by project included in the ADP

The Planning Commission and line ministries provide information on new project approvals

FPMU synthesises the information to be included in the annual monitoring report

CIP2 annual monitoring report: CIP2 GoB allocations and DP commitments

•

•

GoB CIP2 allocations Donor pledges and commitments

•

•

•

The Planning Commission provides information on GoB allocations in the ADP book

ERD provides information on DP commitments

FPMU prepares this section of the monitoring report

CIP2 annual monitoring report: CIP2 GoB allocations and DP commitments

•

•

Non-ADP programmes

Programmes and projects activated and financed by DPs

•

•

ERD facilitates this information to FPMU

Relevant reports from the LCG AFSRD and Country Partnership Framework, as available, may be used to complement the information

Expected outcomes, outputs and inputs

CIP2 annual review meetings

• Meetings conducted at different levels to analyse CIP M&E findings and lessons learned, to identify actions for improvement and long-term sustainability, and to find ways to stimulate the financing of the CIP2

•

•

Meetings are held at TT, TWG, FPWG, FPMC and NC levels

DPs and non-governmental actors participate in these meetings

Expected outcomes and outputs

Mid-term CIP2 programme reviews

• Independent assessments and ad hoc studies to determine the extent to which CIP2 programme outputs have been achieved and the relevance of impact of the strategies and initiatives implemented

•

•

The NC manages these reviews. It is in charge of prioritising, defining the focus, methods of analysis, timing and the management arrangements for such assessments

FPMU provides secretarial technical and operational support to the NC in managing the independent Mid Term Programme Reviews

These reviews are conducted during the third year of the CIP2 implementation



Institutional settings for CIP2 monitoring

At the level of overall Outcomes and Outputs, the institutional settings for CIP2 monitoring are integrated with those for monitoring SDGs relevant to FNS and the upcoming NFNSP in a unified framework which consist of TTs, TWGs, the expanded FPWG and the NC, under the authority of the FPMC and with support from FPMU. Food Planning and Monitoring Committee (FPMC) The Cabinet-level FPMC chaired by the Food Minister includes ministers and secretaries from key sectors: Ministers for Finance, Commerce, Agriculture, Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives, Disaster Management and Relief; secretaries of the Cabinet Division, Internal Resources Division, Finance Division, Statistics and Informatics Division, Food, Women and Children Affairs, Disaster Management and Relief, Health and Family Welfare, Agriculture, and Fisheries and Livestock. The FPMC delivers strategic guidance on FNS issues and establishes a high-level commitment to inter-sectoral collaboration. It provides leadership and oversight in the formulation of food policy strategic documents developed by the institutions it oversees. But it also relies on the technical support provided by these same instances which provide feedback based on their monitoring activities. National Committee (NC) The NC, also chaired by the Food Minister, comprises of the secretaries from the MoF (Finance and Economic Relations Divisions), MoHFW, MoA, MoFL, MoWR, MoDMR, MoFood and IMED; members from the Planning Commission (General Economics Division and Agriculture, Water Resources and Rural Institutions Division); and the Vice Chancellor of BAU, the Executive Chairman of BARC, the President of the Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce and Industry, the Mission Director of USAID, the FAO Representative in Bangladesh, the Director General of the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), the Country Director of the World Bank and the Chief of Party of the IFPRI. The NC oversees the CIP implementation and monitoring processes. Food Policy Working Group (FPWG) The FPWG, chaired by the Food Secretary and consisting of representatives from the Planning Commission (General Economics Division, Socio-economic Infrastructure Division and Agriculture, Water Resources and Rural Institutions Division), Ministry of Finance (Finance Division and Economic Relations Division), and IMED, performs the task of coordination and collaboration at the technical and operational level through the five TTs (see Table A6.2) that carry out the monitoring. Thematic Teams The five TTs monitor the progress towards the objectives of the NFP PoA and the CIP2, assess the effectiveness of ongoing FNS policies and strategic actions against a common results framework and sectoral/cross sectoral targets where appropriate, contribute to the formulation of new programmes and/or expansion of existing ones, contribute to develop and maintain continuous dialogues between FNS stakeholders, and promote effective coordination among ministries/divisions/agencies/stakeholders in the implementation of inclusive investment actions for ensuring nutrition-sensitive food systems.


Table A6.2. Composition of the Thematic Teams

Ministry/department/unit

Thematic Team A for Diversified and Sustainable Agriculture, Fisheries and Livestock

1 FPMU, Ministry of Food 2 Ministry of Agriculture 3 Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock 4 Ministry of Industries 5 Ministry of Water Resources 6 Department of Agriculture Extension 7 Department of Fisheries 8 Department of Livestock Services 9 Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation 10 FPMU, Ministry of Food 11 FPMU, Ministry of Food 12 FPMU, Ministry of Food

Thematic Team B for Efficient and Nutrition-Sensitive Post-Harvest Transformation and Value Chain

13 FPMU, Ministry of Food 14 Ministries of Industries 15 Ministry of Agriculture 16 Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock 17 Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change 18 Local Government Division 19 Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives Division 20 Bangladesh Standard and Testing Institute (BSTI) 21 Department of Agricultural Marketing (DAM) 22 FPMU, Ministry of Food 23 FPMU, Ministry of Food 24 Ministry of Food

Thematic Team C for Improved Dietary Diversity, Consumption and Nutrition

25 FPMU, Ministry of Food 26 Ministry of Food 27 Ministry of Primary and Mass Education 28 Ministry of Women & Children Affairs 29 Health Services Division, MoHFW 30 Local Government Division, MoLGRD&C 31 Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives Division 32 Bangladesh National Nutrition Council (BNNC) 33 Department of Public Health Engineering (DPHE) 34 Institute of Public Health and Nutrition (IPHN) 35 INFS, University of Dhaka 36 FPMU, Ministry of Food 37 FPMU, Ministry of Food

Thematic Team D for Enhanced Access to Social Protection, Safety Nets and Increased Resilience

38 FPMU, Ministry of Food 39 Ministry of Food 40 Cabinet Division 41 Ministry of Women and Children Affairs 42 Finance Division, Ministry of Finance 43 Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief 44 Ministry of Primary and Mass Education 45 Ministry of Social Welfare 46 Local Government Division, MoLGRD&C 47 General Economic Division 48 Departments of Food 49 Bangladesh National Nutrition Council (BNNC) 50 FPMU, Ministry of Food


Ministry/department/unit

Thematic Team E for Cross Cutting Issues of Nutrition-Sensitive Food System and Strategies

51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

FPMU, Ministry of Food GED, Planning Commission Finance Division, Ministry of Finance ERD, Ministry of Finance Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change Local Government Division, MoLGRD&C Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) Bangladesh Food Safety Authority (BFSA) Bangladesh Accreditation Board (BAB) Institute of Public Health (IPH) Department of Public Health Engineering FPMU, Ministry of Food FPMU, Ministry of Food FPMU, Ministry of Food

Food Planning and Monitoring Unit (FPMU) FPMU of the Ministry of Food provides technical and operational support to these institutions, and acts as the secretariat of the various instances. In addition to the institutional setup in place for the CIP1, eight TWGs which include focal points from each relevant government sector have been established by FPMU in partnership with 13 ministries (see Table A6.3.). These TWGs assisted FPMU in developing the CIP2.


Chain Development

Tab

le A

6.3.

Com

posi

tion

of th

e T

echn

ical

Wor

king

Gro

ups

Tec

hnic

al

Wor

king

G

roup

M

embe

rs

Sustainable and Diversified Agriculture

Con

vene

r: D

G F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

1. R

esea

rch

Dire

ctor

(Foo

d A

vaila

bilit

y), F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

2. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m M

inis

try o

f Agr

icul

ture

, Ban

glad

esh

Secr

etar

iat,

Dha

ka

3. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m D

epar

tmen

t of A

gric

ultu

ral E

xten

sion

(DA

E), D

haka

4.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Ban

glad

esh

Agr

icul

tura

l Res

earc

h C

ounc

il (B

AR

C),

Dha

ka

5. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m B

angl

ades

h A

gric

ultu

ral R

esea

rch

Inst

itute

(BA

RI)

, Gaz

ipur

6.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Soi

l Res

ourc

es D

evel

opm

ent I

nstit

ute

(SR

DI)

, Dha

ka

7. C

hief

Tec

hnic

al A

dviso

r (C

TA),

MU

CH

-FA

O

8. N

atio

nal E

xper

t, M

UC

H-F

AO

9.

Inte

rnat

iona

l Exp

ert,

MU

CH

-FA

O

Mem

ber S

ecre

tary

: Res

earc

h O

ffic

er, F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

Fisheries & Livestock

Con

vene

r: D

G F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

1. R

esea

rch

Dire

ctor

(Foo

d A

vaila

bilit

y), F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

2. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m M

inis

try o

f Fis

herie

s an

d Li

vest

ock

(MoF

L), B

angl

ades

h Se

cret

aria

t 3.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Dep

artm

ent o

f Liv

esto

ck S

ervi

ce (D

oLS)

, Dha

ka

4. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m D

epar

tmen

t of F

ishe

ries

(DoF

), D

haka

5.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Ban

glad

esh

Live

stoc

k R

esea

rch

Inst

itute

(BLR

I), S

avar

, Dha

ka

6. C

hief

Tec

hnic

al A

dviso

r (C

TA),

MU

CH

-FA

O

7. N

atio

nal E

xper

t, M

UC

H-F

AO

8.

Inte

rnat

iona

l Exp

ert,

MU

CH

-FA

O

Mem

ber S

ecre

tary

: Res

earc

h O

ffice

r, FP

MU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

Agricultural Inputs and Water Resources

Con

vene

r: D

G F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

1. R

esea

rch

Dire

ctor

(Foo

d A

vaila

bilit

y), F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

2. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m B

angl

ades

h A

gric

ultu

ral D

evel

opm

ent C

orpo

ratio

n (B

AD

C),

Dha

ka

3. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m B

angl

ades

h W

ater

Dev

elop

men

t Boa

rd (B

WD

B),

Dha

ka

4. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m B

angl

ades

h C

hem

ical

Indu

strie

s C

orpo

ratio

n (B

CIC

), D

haka

5.

Chi

ef T

echn

ical

Adv

isor (

CTA

), M

UC

H-F

AO

6.

Nat

iona

l Exp

ert,

MU

CH

-FA

O

7. In

tern

atio

nal E

xper

t, M

UC

H-F

AO

M

embe

r Sec

reta

ry: A

ssoc

iate

Res

earc

h D

irect

or, F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

Access to Market and Value Chain Development

Con

vene

r: D

G F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

1. R

esea

rch

Dire

ctor

(Foo

d A

cces

s), F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

2. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m L

GD

, MoL

GR

D&

C, B

angl

ades

h Se

cret

aria

t, D

haka

3.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

RD

CD

, MoL

GR

D&

C, B

angl

ades

h Se

cret

aria

t, D

haka

4.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Dep

artm

ent o

f Agr

icul

tura

l Ext

ensi

on (D

AE)

, Dha

ka

5. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m D

epar

tmen

t of L

ives

tock

Ser

vice

(DLS

), D

haka

6.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Dep

artm

ent o

f Agr

icul

tura

l Mar

ketin

g (D

AM

), D

haka

7.

Chi

ef T

echn

ical

Adv

isor (

CTA

), M

UC

H-F

AO

8.

Nat

iona

l Exp

ert,

MU

CH

-FA

O

9. In

tern

atio

nal E

xper

t, M

UC

H-F

AO

M

embe

r Sec

reta

ry: A

ssoc

iate

Res

earc

h D

irect

or, F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

Tec

hnic

al

Wor

king

G

roup

M

embe

rs

CTP Costing & Information System

Con

vene

r: D

G F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

1. R

esea

rch

Dire

ctor

(Man

agem

ent,

Info

rmat

ion

& C

o-or

dina

tion)

, FPM

U, M

inist

ry o

f Foo

d 2.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Fin

ance

Div

isio

n, M

inist

ry o

f Fin

ance

, Ban

glad

esh

Secr

etar

iat

3. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m G

ener

al E

cono

mic

s D

ivis

ion

(GED

), Pl

anni

ng C

omm

issi

on

4. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m E

cono

mic

Rel

atio

ns D

ivis

ion

(ER

D),

Min

istry

of F

inan

ce

5. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m D

epar

tmen

t of A

gric

ultu

ral E

xten

sion

(DA

E), D

haka

6.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Ban

glad

esh

Bur

eau

of S

tatis

tics

(BBS

), D

haka

7.

Res

earc

h O

ffice

r (M

IC),

FPM

U, M

inist

ry o

f Foo

d 8.

Chi

ef T

echn

ical

Adv

isor (

CTA

), M

UC

H-F

AO

9.

Nat

iona

l Exp

ert,

MU

CH

-FA

O

10. I

nter

natio

nal E

xper

t, M

UC

H-F

AO

M

embe

r Sec

reta

ry: A

ssoc

iate

Res

earc

h D

irect

or, F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

Vulnerability & Social Security

Con

vene

r: D

G F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

1. R

esea

rch

Dire

ctor

(Foo

d A

cces

s), F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

2. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m M

inis

try o

f Soc

ial W

elfa

re, B

angl

ades

h Se

cret

aria

t 3.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Min

istry

of W

omen

and

Chi

ldre

n A

ffairs

, Ban

glad

esh

Secr

etar

iat

4. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m D

epar

tmen

t of D

isast

er M

anag

emen

t (D

DM

), D

haka

5.

Chi

ef T

echn

ical

Adv

isor (

CTA

), M

UC

H-F

AO

6.

Nat

iona

l Exp

ert,

MU

CH

-FA

O

7. I

nter

natio

nal E

xper

t, M

UC

H-F

AO

M

embe

r Sec

reta

ry: A

ssoc

iate

Res

earc

h D

irect

or, F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

Nutrition-Sensitive Programme

Con

vene

r: D

G F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

1. R

esea

rch

Dire

ctor

(Foo

d U

tilisa

tion

& N

utrit

ion)

, FPM

U, M

inist

ry o

f Foo

d 2.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Min

istry

of H

ealth

and

Fam

ily W

elfa

re, B

angl

ades

h Se

cret

aria

t 3.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

BA

RC

, Dha

ka

4. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m B

IRTA

N, D

haka

5.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Inst

itute

of P

ublic

Hea

lth N

utrit

ion

(IPH

N),

Dha

ka

6. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m D

epar

tmen

t of L

ives

tock

Ser

vice

(DLS

), D

haka

7.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

NN

C, D

haka

8.

Chi

ef T

echn

ical

Adv

isor (

CTA

), M

UC

H-F

AO

9.

Nat

iona

l Exp

ert,

MU

CH

-FA

O

10. I

nter

natio

nal E

xper

t, M

UC

H-F

AO

M

embe

r Sec

reta

ry: A

ssoc

iate

Res

earc

h D

irect

or, F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

Food Safety & Quality Improvement

Con

vene

r: D

G F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

1. R

esea

rch

Dire

ctor

(Foo

d A

vaila

bilit

y), F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood

2. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m L

GD

, MoL

GR

D&

C, B

angl

ades

h Se

cret

aria

t, D

haka

3.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Ban

glad

esh

Food

Saf

ety

Aut

horit

y (B

FSA

) 4.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

Ban

glad

esh

Stan

dard

and

Tes

ting

Inst

itute

(BST

I)

5. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m B

angl

ades

h A

ccre

dita

tion

Boar

d (B

AB

), D

haka

6.

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

from

INFS

, Dha

ka U

nive

rsity

, Dha

ka

7. R

epre

sent

ativ

e fro

m In

stitu

te o

f Pub

lic H

ealth

Nut

ritio

n (I

PHN

), D

haka

8.

Chi

ef T

echn

ical

Adv

isor (

CTA

), M

UC

H-F

AO

9.

Nat

iona

l Exp

ert,

MU

CH

-FA

O

10. I

nter

natio

nal E

xper

t, M

UC

H-F

AO

M

embe

r Sec

reta

ry: A

ssoc

iate

Res

earc

h D

irect

or, F

PMU

, Min

istry

of F

ood


Finally, members of the LCG AFSRD participate in the CIP Annual Review Meetings. The LCG AFSRD is the venue for dialogue between Government and its DPs. LCGs are designed to contribute towards effective and coordinated implementation of national policies, strategies, plans and programmes.

Challenges in implementing CIP2 M&E

A number of preconditions are required to the CIP2 M&E system to function effectively: • Adequate resources: Human and financial resources are key to a well-functioning M&E system.

Officials from FPMU, TTs, TWG and FPWG assigned to working on the monitoring of the CIP2 must have the right technical and operational capacities and their roles in the monitoring must be endorsed at the highest level. This is especially the case for officials who are from ministries not traditionally associated with the food and nutrition policy of the country and whose role in the CIP2 process may seem as outside their job’s purview. Sub-programme V.4.2. endeavours to mobilise resources to ensure that such capacities exist. Financial resources also need to be secured to carry out CIP2 Mid Term Programme Reviews.

• Stakeholders’ engagement: Stakeholder participation throughout the different phases of the CIP2 life cycle ensures ownership, learning and sustainability of results. Stakeholders are the best positioned to establish whether the planned results and investment operations remain relevant. Their partaking in the monitoring facilitates effective communication to increase coordination, engagement, mobilise additional resources to fill resource gaps.

• Coordination: Monitoring the CIP2 is the collective responsibility of the numerous implementing entities which poses significant coordination challenges. To this effect, Sub-programme V.4.1. proposes to strengthen coordination mechanisms liaising with existing FNS frameworks, clusters and networks. Ensuring synergy and coordination among partners working towards common results supports: strategic focus and use of limited resources; enhanced synergy and coordination among key actors; accountability and informed decision making; avoiding duplication of efforts; and identification of gaps. Annual Review Meetings will promote partnerships and ensure linkages to national development goals.

Opportunities in implementing CIP2 M&E

• A guide to adjust the CIP2 implementation: The CIP monitoring sets the ground for adjustments in the CIP2 and provides evidence to justify any changes that the NC may decide to make. The evaluation process that takes place through the planned independent Mid Term Programme Reviews also provides critical feedback for improving programming, policies and strategies. While monitoring provides real-time information on the implementation of CIP2 programmes and investment projects, the Programme Reviews consist of critical in-depth assessments.

• Developing nutrition-sensitive indicators: As the development of the CIP2’s results framework has shown, indicators that reflect the impact of different programmes on nutrition are scarce -even in fields such as agriculture which have a direct impact on a country’s nutrition- because nutrition objectives are rarely incorporated in the design of programmes. As the monitoring framework and indicators of the CIP2 are finalised, the opportunity should be seized to sensitise policy makers to the need to incorporate nutrition in their objectives and to develop indicators accordingly.

Official

Typewritten Text

Official

Typewritten Text

Official

Typewritten Text

NUTRITION-SENSITIVE FOOD SYSTEMS...

Documents

Transcript of NUTRITION-SENSITIVE FOOD SYSTEMS...