Nutrient Overload The Pollution of Nitrogen &...
Transcript of Nutrient Overload The Pollution of Nitrogen &...
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 1
Nutrient Overload The Pollution of Nitrogen &
Phosphorus
6th Annual Operator Field Day
Granite State Rural Water AssociationSeptember 13, 2011
Kitty Lane, Eastern Analytical
Steve Clifton, Underwood Engineers
TODAY’S AGENDA
Sampling Plan
Examples
BNR Overview
Lebanon WWTF
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 2
Sampling Plan
What to Sample
• For Permit Compliance
• For Process Performance
• For Modeling Parameters
Typical Testing Requirements for NPDES Permit
Influent TestingTSSVSSpHTemperatureBOD5COD – total and solubleTP - Soluble and ParticulateTotal Nitrogen – TKN and AmmoniaNitrate/Nitrite maybe
Effluent TestingTSSpHBOD5COD – total and solubleTP – soluble and particulateTotal Nitrogen
TKNParticulate Organic NDissolved Organic NAmmonia
Nitrates and Nitrites
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 3
Typical Testing for Process
• Aerobic Stages– Nitrification, BOD5 removal
• Anoxic Stages– Denitrification
• Anaerobic Stages– Phosphorus release
• Sidestreams– Sometimes a major load to the process!
Typical Testing for Modeling Parameters
BioWin Sampling Requirements
(2) Primary Effluent Sample Chain
Primary Effluent Sample
Homogenize
COD BOD TKN TP
Filter (GF 1.2 um)
TSS VSS
COD NH3 PO4
Flocculate and filter (GF 1.2 um)
COD
Filtrate Filtrate
PO4 on Filtrate
0.45 um membrane
9
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 4
COD Fraction
Total Influent COD
Biodegradable
Readily Biodegradable
Soluble
Complex
SCFA (VFA)
Slowly Biodegradable Particulate
Colloidal
Particulate
Unbiodegradable
Soluble
Particulate
Wastewater Characteristics Concentration (mg/L) Fractions
Typical COD
Total COD 250 – 700
Readily Biodegradable COD 25 – 125 0.05 – 0.25
Slowly Biodegradable COD 200 - 400 0.4 - 0.80
Soluble Unbiodegradable COD 20 – 50 0.04 – 0.16
Particulate Unbiodegradable COD 35 – 110 0.07 – 0.22
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
TKN Fraction
Total Influent TKN
Ammonia – N
(free and saline)
Total Organic Nitrogen
Biodegradable
Soluble
Particulate
Unbiodegradable
Soluble
Particulate
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 5
Wastewater Characteristics Concentration (mg/L) Fractions
Typical Nitrogenous Material
TKN 25 – 70
Free and Saline Ammonia 20 – 30 0.5 – 0.75
Biodegradable organically bound TKN
0 – 10 0 – 0.25
Soluble unbiodegradable TKN
0 – 5 0 – 0.07
Particulate unbiodegradableTKN
2 - 8 0.03 – 0.07
NITROGEN FRACTIONS
TP Fraction
Total Influent Phosphorus
Orthophosphate
Organically Bound Phosphorus
Biodegradable
Soluble
Particulate
Unbiodegradable
Soluble
Particulate
Wastewater Characteristics Concentration (mg/L) Fractions
Typical Phosphorus Material
Total Phosphorus – TP 4 – 15
Orthophosphate 2 – 12 0.50 – 0.85
Biodegradable organically bound TP
0 – 10 0 – 0.25
Soluble unbiodegradable TP 0 - ? 0 - ?
Particulate unbiodegradable TP 1 - 4 0.02 – 0.03
PHOSPHORUS FRACTIONS
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 6
TSS Fraction
Total Influent Suspended Solids
Volatile Solids
nbVSS
bVSS
Inert Solids
9/14/2011 Updated BNR Schematics.pptx
Wastewater Characteristics Concentration (mg/L)
Fractions
Typical Influent TSS
Raw Total Suspended Solids - TSS 150 - 300
Raw Volatile Suspended Solids – VSS 125 – 255 0.7 – 0.85
Inorganic Suspended Solids - ISS 25 – 45 0.15 – 0.3
TSS FRACTIONS
Examples
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 7
Wastewater CharacterizationExamples
Newmarket, NH
Lebanon, NH
Merrimack, NH
Newmarket, NH
• Design Flow = 0.85 MGD
• Currently at 0.6 MGD
• Domestic flows
• Trickling filters
• Anaerobic Digesters
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 8
Lebanon, NH
• Design Flow = 3.18 MGD
• Currently at 2.0 MGD
• Domestic, commercial, and industrial flows
• DAF and centrifuge
• Septage
Merrimack, NH
• Design Flow = 4.14MGD
• ADF = 2.0 MGD
• Municipal and Anheuser-Busch flows
• Going towards A2/O
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 9
Wastewater Characteristics Newmarket, NHmg/L
Lebanon, NHmg/L
Merrimack, NH
mg/L
Organic Material - COD
Total COD 481 443 771
COD glass filtered 156 203 267
COD membrane filtered 90 165 171
COD floc/filtered 91 111 156
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
Wastewater Characteristics
Newmarket, NHmg/L
Lebanon, NHmg/L
Merrimack, NH
mg/L
Nitrogenous Material
TKN 42 35 53
TKN glass filtered 31 29 25
NH3-N 27 24 24
NOx 0.6 0.7 10
NITROGEN FRACTIONS
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 10
Wastewater Characteristics
Newmarket, NHmg/L
Lebanon, NHmg/L
Merrimack,NH
mg/L
Phosphorus Material
Total Phosphorus – TP 5.7 5.7 13
Orthophosphate 3.2 2.6 6.2
PHOSPHORUS FRACTIONS
Fractions
Ratios Newmarket Lebanon Merrimack
COD:BOD 2.21 3.47 2.38
VSS:TSS 0.86 0.81 0.56
NH3:TKN 0.64 0.64 0.45
BOD:TKN 5.4 4.0 4.1
COD:TP 91 75 41
BOD:TP 42 23 17.3
PO4:P 0.59 0.42 0.49
Rules of Thumb• COD/TP = 40:1
• BOD/TP = 20:1
• COD/TKN = 4:1
Nitrification consumes• 4.6 lb O2 / lb NH3-N oxidized
• 7.1 lb alkalinity / lb NH3-N oxidized
Denitrification recovers
• 3.6 lb alkalinity / lb NO3 - N denitrified
• 2.9 lb O2 / lb NO3 - N denitrified
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 11
ORP – Oxidation Reduction Potential
Activity Range, mv e- AcceptorCBOD oxidation +50 to +200 O2
PolyP development +40 to +250 O2
Nitrification +150 to +350 O2
Denitrification -50 to +50 NO3-
PolyP breakdown -40 to -175 NO3-, SO4
=
Sulfide formation -50 to -250 SO4=
Acid formation -40 to -200 Organics
Methane formation -200 to -350 Organics
(Goronzy, et.al. 1992)
BNR Overview
BNR – Biological Nutrient Removal
Three major methods of pollutant removal
Biological –Fixed Film or Suspended Growth
Chemical – Adding chemicals
Physical – Settling, filtration, screening
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 12
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
RETURN SLUDGE
AERATED
ACTIVATED SLUDGE (Aerobic Stage)
SECONDARY CLARIFIER
INFLUENT
Today Biological Nutrient Removal
• Aerobic Stage– BOD5 Removal
– Nitrification
• Anaerobic and Anoxic Stages– Phosphorous Removal
– Nitrogen Removal
– Combined Phosphorus and Nitrogen Removal
Anaerobic Stage
• Anaerobic stages are unaerated zones within the activated sludge process that will favor Phosphate Accumulating Organisms when no DO is present and no nitrates are present
• Phosphorus is released in an anaerobic zone and taken up in greater quantities in the aerobic stage
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 13
Anaerobic Stage• Conditions critical to phosphorus release in the
anaerobic stage?– Readily biodegradable COD– No dissolved oxygen– No Nitrates– BOD5 to TP ratio > 20 for low TP effluent
• Benefits of an anaerobic stage?- Uptake of BOD5 going to Aerobic Stage- Reduction in sludge to dispose- Well settling sludge
• Phoredox Process (AO Process) for Phosphorus Removal
TWO STAGE ACTIVATED SLUDGE
ANAEROBIC STAGE AEROBIC STAGE
RETURN SLUDGE
SECONDARYCLARIFIER
INFLUENT
Anoxic Stage
• Started out with “Selectors” that favored non-filamentous bacteria
• Selectors morphed into anaerobic and anoxic stages within the activated sludge process
• Anoxic stages are unaerated zones within the activated sludge process, that when no DO is present and nitrates are present, will favor denitrification bacteria growth
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 14
• Modified Ludzak-Ettinger Process for Nitrogen Removal
TWO STAGE ACTIVATED SLUDGE
ANOXIC STAGE AEROBIC STAGE
NITRATE RECYCLE
RETURN SLUDGE
SECONDARYCLARIFIER
INFLUENT
Various BNR Process
• A2O• UCT• VIP• MUCT• 4 and 5 STAGE BARDENPHO• SBR• IFAS• BIOMAG
A2O ProcessLEBANON, NH THREE STAGE ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS
(MLE and A2/O PROCESS)
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 15
AEROBICANOXICANAEROBIC
RETURN SLUDGE
NITRATE RECYCLE
MLE / A2O Process
SECONDARYCLARIFIER
MUCT Somersworth, NH
77,000 gal 77,000 gal 39,000 gal 98,000 gal 619,000 gal
AEROBIC(2) ANOXIC(2) ANAEROBIC
RETURN SLUDGE
NITRATE RECYCLEMLSS RETURN
2 4 51 3
MUCT (2 Trains) Somersworth, NH
2.4 MGD Design Flow
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 16
Pease SBRs
Pease WWTF
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Effluent TN, mg/L
TN <5
No Biopharmaceutical Discharge
Hooksett, NH IFASGraves Engineering
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER
ANOXIC
RETURN SLUDGE
NITRATE RECYCLE
AEROBICANAEROBIC
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 17
Hooksett IFAS
Plastic media
Hooksett On Line
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 18
NORTH CONWAY WWTF5 STAGE BARDENPHO PROCESS
AN
AX
AER
AER
AX
Allenstown, NH BioMag (HTA)
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER
ANOXIC
RETURN SLUDGE
NITRATE RECYCLE
AEROBICANAEROBIC
Mix Tank
Drum KadyMill
Screen
Mag Feeder
Waste Sludge Storage
Mag Recovery
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 19
Underwood Engineers 9/14/2011
1:15 PM GSRWA Field Day 20
THE END
THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING
THESE SLIDES CAN BE FOUND ON OUR WEBSITE AT
UNDERWOODENGINEERS.COM
Chemical Phosphorus RemovalAlum, PAC, ACH
• Al 3+ + PO43- AlPO4
Ferric Chloride
• FeCl3 + PO43- FePO4 + Cl-
Dosages can be as high as 7:1 on a weight ratio
Ratio Mole Ratio Weight Ratio Optimum pH
Al:P 1:1 0.87:1 5.5 – 6.5
Fe+3:P 1:1 1.8:1 4.5 - 5