NUSAM News Letter May 2014 - NA :...
Transcript of NUSAM News Letter May 2014 - NA :...
![Page 1: NUSAM News Letter May 2014 - NA : IAEAcra.iaea.org/cra/documents/J02004_NUSAM_NewsLetter_May_2014.pdf · Editorial Committee: Mr. Abdul Shakoor, Mr. Richard Little, Ms. Tereza Malachova,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042102/5e7e9ef21a637567505d97ae/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Issue 1
NUSAM NEWSLETTER
IAEA Launches Project on Nuclear Security Assessment Methodologies (NUSAM) for Regulated Facilities
May 2014
Editorial Committee: Mr. Abdul Shakoor, Mr. Richard Little, Ms. Tereza Malachova, and Mr. Sung Soon
Participants of the research coordination meeting, 17-21 March 2014, Vienna, Austria
IAEA has launched the
Coordinated Research
Project on Nuclear Securi-
ty Assessment Methodolo-
gies (NUSAM) for Regu-
lated Facilities. The first
research coordination
meeting was held from 17
to 21 March 2014; Vienna,
Austria, where 24 experts
from 13 Member States
participated the meeting.
The main objective of the
NUSAM project is to es-
tablish a risk-informed,
performance-based meth-
odological framework for
nuclear security assess-
ment. The framework will
be used to assess the nucle-
ar security of regulated fa-
cilities and activities in a
systematic, structured, and
comprehensive manner.
While the NUSAM project
may explore new approaches
to nuclear security assess-
ment, consistency with rec-
ommendations, require-
ments and guidance provid-
ed in current IAEA Nuclear
Security documents will be
maintained. A secondary
objective is to provide an
environment for the sharing
and transfer of knowledge
and experience, and to pro-
vide guidance on, and prac-
tical examples of good prac-
tice in security assessment.
The project is structured in
a manner where the use
and applicability of the
methodological framework
can be illustrated on a prac-
tical basis through the use
of case studies. While the
focus of the project is on the
overall assessment frame-
work, specific components
judged to be key compo-
nents in the methodology
will be explored and devel-
oped in more detail.
NUSAM partners
• Bangladesh, Bangladesh
Atomic Energy Commission
• Czech Republic, EBIS Co.
• Egypt, Egyptian Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory
Authority (ENRRA)
• Hungary, Hungarian Atomic
Energy Authority
• India, Bhabha Atomic Re-
search Centre (BARC)
• Japan, Japan Atomic Energy
Agency (JAEA)
• Netherland, URENCO
• Pakistan, Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority
(PNRA)
• Korea, Korea Atomic Ener-gy Research Institute (KAERI) and Korea Institute of Nuclear Non-proliferation and Control
(KINAC)
• Sweden, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Manage-ment Co. (SKB) and OKG
Aktiebolag (OKG AB)
• UK, National Nuclear La-
boratories (NNL)
• USA, Sandia National La-
boratories (SNL)
The NUSAM is a coordinated research project (http://cra.iaea.org) to develop risk-
informed performance-based methodological framework for nuclear
security assessment of regulated facilities and activities.
JOIN NUSAM
Be a part of an expert
group developing a
methodology to assess
nuclear security effec-
tiveness, resulting in
improved security world-
wide.
![Page 2: NUSAM News Letter May 2014 - NA : IAEAcra.iaea.org/cra/documents/J02004_NUSAM_NewsLetter_May_2014.pdf · Editorial Committee: Mr. Abdul Shakoor, Mr. Richard Little, Ms. Tereza Malachova,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042102/5e7e9ef21a637567505d97ae/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PAGE 2 NUSAM NEWSLETTER ISSUE 1
The NUSAM meth-
odology will be
used in
1. Design,
2. Evaluation,
3. Regulation, and
4. Self-Assessment
by
1. Operator,
2. Designer,
3. Regulator, and
4. Independent Con-
sultant
for
Nuclear fuel-cycle facil-ities and facilities asso-ciated with radioactive
materials including
1. Nuclear Power
Plant,
2. Irradiator Facility,
3. Transport of Mate-
rials,
4. LEU Fuel Fabrica-
tion Facility, and
5. Spent Fuel Storage
Facility.
Questions to Answer in the Project JOIN NUSAM
Share best practices in security assessment approaches. Identify
ways to use manual and computer tools to better
assess security effec-tiveness.
• How can we assess the overall security effectiveness of nuclear facili-
ties/activities in an integrated manner?
• How can we compare a primarily prescriptive assessment with a com-
plex performance assessment for decision making?
• Which tools/methodologies might be useful for application to the
range of different nuclear facilities/activities?
• How can a wide range of performance test results be incorporated
into a security assessment?
Provisional Methodological Framework
A provisional methodological
framework for the NUSAM Pro-
ject provides a high level sum-
mary of the key steps to be fol-
lowed when undertaking a se-
curity assessment. The Frame-
work focuses on the complete
risk management cycle that
includes setting the context,
conducting security assess-
ments, identifying the gaps and
potential improvements in the
system, implementing the up-
grades and managing the sys-
tem. The various working
groups will work on different
aspects of the Framework and
propose further improvements.
The NUSAM project is open to Institute/professionals from Member States who under-
take technical activities related to the assessment of the security of nuclear and other
radioactive materials, as well as associated facilities and activities
Participation in NUSAM project
![Page 3: NUSAM News Letter May 2014 - NA : IAEAcra.iaea.org/cra/documents/J02004_NUSAM_NewsLetter_May_2014.pdf · Editorial Committee: Mr. Abdul Shakoor, Mr. Richard Little, Ms. Tereza Malachova,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042102/5e7e9ef21a637567505d97ae/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PAGE 3 NUSAM NEWSLETTER ISSUE 1
Organizational Structure of the NUSAM
The NUSAM project con-
sists of a series of work-
ing groups with oversight
provided by a Coordi-
nating Group consisting
of working group leaders,
led by a chairperson and
supported by an IAEA
Scientific Secretary. The
Group provides oversight,
controls the scope of the
project and ensures that
the objectives of the pro-
ject are being achieved.
Essential Information Working Group
identify and manage asso-
ciated uncertainties.
This working group will
also identify and review
processes to develop, docu-
ment, and justify a set of
scenarios in order to per-
form comprehensive and
consistent nuclear security
assessments. During the
first year, the group will
prepare a draft report con-
taining a listing and evalu-
ation of identified tools and
approaches available to
Member States to perform
nuclear security assess-
ments. During the second
Analysis Working Group
The Analysis Working
Group will review and de-
velop risk-informed, per-
formance-based approach-
es and, tools in order to
perform nuclear security
assessments as well as to
year, the group will devel-
op a recommendation for
tools and approaches to
perform nuclear security
assessments for use in the
security case studies and
will interact with the Secu-
rity Case Study Working
Groups to ensure that the
products provide necessary
information needed to pro-
duce successful case stud-
ies. During the third year,
the group will interact
with the other groups to
resolve any inconsistencies
and to ensure complete-
ness.
port containing all key
components and infor-
mation necessary for nucle-
ar security assessments
will be produced. During
the second year, the Group
will continue to finalise the
working material and begin
interacting with the Securi-
ty Case Study Working
Groups to ensure that the
products provide infor-
The Essential Infor-
mation Working Group
will identify key compo-
nents and information
needed to perform securi-
ty assessments and key
information for the devel-
opment of a hypothetical
state to be used for the
Security Case Studies.
During the first year, it is
expected that a draft re-
mation needed to produce
successful case studies.
During the third year, the
Group will finalize its ex-
pected reports/documents
and interact with the other
groups with the significant
interaction between the
groups to resolve any in-
consistencies and to ensure
completeness.
Working Group
Leaders
Chairperson
Mr. Joseph Rivers, USA
Essential Information WG
Mr. Abdul Shakoor, Pakistan
Analysis WG
Mr. Joseph Rivers, USA
Nuclear Power Plant Case
Study WG
Ms. Tereza Malachova, Czech Republic
Irradiator Facility Case
Study WG
Mr. Jeremy Edwards, UK
Transport Case Study WG
Mr. Jan Strangebye, Sweden
LEU Fuel Fabrication and
Spent Fuel Storage Case
Study WGs
will start in 2015
![Page 4: NUSAM News Letter May 2014 - NA : IAEAcra.iaea.org/cra/documents/J02004_NUSAM_NewsLetter_May_2014.pdf · Editorial Committee: Mr. Abdul Shakoor, Mr. Richard Little, Ms. Tereza Malachova,](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042102/5e7e9ef21a637567505d97ae/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
PAGE 4 NUSAM NEWSLETTER ISSUE 1
Meeting of the Coor-
dinating Group
2—3 September 2014
Vienna, Austria
Chairperson and Working
Group Leaders
SharePoint Site
NUSAM Portal (SharePoint
Site) was formed under the
existing NUSEC portal of IAEA
(https://nusec.iaea.org).
This is a secured portal and the
NUSAM partners can obtain
the login information by send-
ing request to the Scientific
Secretary ([email protected])
Upcoming Events
The NUSAM Plenary
Meeting
13—17 October 2014
Vienna, Austria
For more information on, and to
join NUSAM, please contact :
Mr. Sung Soon Jang
Phone: +43 1 2600 26638 Fax: +43 1 2600 29299
E-mail: [email protected]
Case Study Working Groups Nuclear Power Plant, Irradiator Facility, Transport, LEU fuel
fabrication, Spent Fuel Storage
Case Study Working
Groups will illustrate the
application of the
NUSAM methodological
framework. The develop-
ment of security cases will
provide a basis for discus-
sion of the many practical
issues encountered when
undertaking a nuclear
security assessment, with
the aim of reaching con-
sensus in as many areas
as possible.
A draft report containing a
detailed model of the facili-
ty/activity will be devel-
oped. Each working group
will enhance their model
based on information re-
ceived from the Essential
Information and Analysis
Working Groups, and per-
form the nuclear security
analysis using the recom-
mended methodological
framework.
Each working group will
interact with the other
groups with
the signifi-
cant interac-
tion between
the groups to
resolve any
inconsisten-
cies and to
ensure com-
pleteness.
At the NUSAM meeting of
17-21 March, the Nuclear
Power Plant WG, Irradi-
ator Facility WG and
Transport WG started to
collect relevant information
and to develop hypothetical
cases for assessment. The
work of the Irradiator Facil-
ity WG and Transport WG
will be completed within a
year and thereafter the
LEU Fuel Fabrication
WG and Spent Fuel Stor-
age WG will
be initiated
in 2015. The
work of Nu-
clear Power
Plant WG
will be com-
pleted with-
in two years.
Expected Outputs
• An enhanced risk-informed perfor-mance-based meth-odological frame-work for nuclear
security assessment
• Practical illustration of the methodologi-cal framework’s ap-plication to hypo-
thetical study cases
• Identification and review of tools/
methodologies
Time Scale
It is planned that the pro-ject will be executed over a period of up to three years. During this period, it is expected that the NUSAM project groups will meet every
six months.
Interface with other related IAEA Projects
The group will also
propose and
communicate any
potential
enhancements to the
methodological
framework.
relevant to the NUSAM
project. The objective is to
identify such projects and
establish interfaces with
those projects to avoid the
duplication and overlap-
ping. Some examples are
It was noted during the
meeting that IAEA Divi-
sion of Nuclear Security
is working on the develop-
ment of implementing
guides and technical ref-
erences which may be
the implementing guides on
“Physical Protection of Nu-
clear Material and Nuclear
Facilities” and “Security of
Nuclear Material in
Transport”.