Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

download Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

of 30

Transcript of Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    1/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTERS: China

    SIGNATORIES: Israel, Turkey, Egypt, USA

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.1

    Alarmedat the limited security measures against non-government obtainment of1

    nuclear fissile materials,2

    Reminding member nations of the importance of reprocessing unneeded nuclear3

    fissile material into lower-enriched forms to keep such material out of the hands4

    of terrorists,5

    6

    1. Urges the Security Council to create a body specifically targeting7

    nuclear terrorism, in order to:8

    a. Bridge the gap between the combating of terrorism and the9

    safety of nuclear facilities,10

    b. Create uniform guidelines to fulfill the obligations under11

    Security Council Resolution 1540;12

    2. Further urges nations to provide rewards (financial or otherwise) to13

    operators of nuclear facilities who upgrade their facilities in compliance14

    with the aforementioned guidelines, in order to:15

    a. Prevent corrupt practices,16

    b. Encourage investment into costly safety measures17

    3. Recommends that the IAEA be involved in inspection practices of18

    facilities storing or processing nuclear fissile materials, provided that:19

    a. The IAEA respects national sovereignty and obtains member20

    nations approval before inspecting facilities and publishing21

    findings,22

    b.23

    4. Calls for increased cooperation between scientists and technicians24

    from different member nations in order to:25

    a. Exchange best practices regarding storage of nuclear fissile26

    materials and nuclear warheads,27

    b. Develop new technologies (such as encryption codes) to28

    effectively prevent terrorist groups from utilizing any nuclear29

    weapons components obtained,30

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    2/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTERS: China

    SIGNATORIES: Israel, Turkey, Egypt, USA

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.1

    c. Explore further methods in which highly enriched fissile31

    materials can be converted for civilian uses such as electricity32

    generation,33

    5. Decides to remain actively seized on the matter.34

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    3/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: Israel

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.2

    Recognizing the realistic danger and potential of nuclear terrorism,1

    Considers the use of nuclear armaments as tools for terror in nations in2

    possession of nuclear arms,3

    Deplores secret possession of nuclear armaments,4

    5

    1. Condemns the use of dirty bombs and/or nuclear arms and variants for the6

    purpose of inducing terror,7

    2. Demands for nations to tighten the security of nuclear facilities and stockpiles,8

    3. Strongly condemns the possession of nuclear arms by rogue nations that lack9

    credibility, military, social and political stability which in turn endangers global10

    welfare,11

    4. Condemns terrorism:12

    a) Demands active, preemptive and tenacious campaigns against13

    terrorism in the forms including but not limited to:14

    i. the disownment and purging of currently state-endorsed15

    terrorists and,16

    ii. law enforcement offensives against terrorists;17

    5. Requests member nations to limit the further proliferation of nuclear18

    technology, so as to prevent the widespread capability of development and19

    possession of nuclear arms,20

    6. Supports preemptive military strikes against nations whose nuclear21

    armaments pose immediate threat to global security,22

    7. Appreciates the important role that intelligence campaigns play in the war23

    against terrorism, especially those perpetrated by the United Kingdom and the24

    United States of America,25

    8. Decides to remain seized on the matter.26

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    4/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: Russia

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.3

    Having in mindthe purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations1

    concerning the maintenance of international peace and security and the2

    promotion of good-neighbourliness and friendly relations and cooperation3

    among States,4

    Recognizing the right of all States to develop and apply nuclear energy for5

    peaceful purposes and their legitimate interests in the potential benefits to be6

    derived from the peaceful application of nuclear energy,7

    Deeply concernedabout the worldwide escalation of acts of terrorism in all its8

    forms and manifestations,9

    Understanding that the nature of terrorist groups make States where terrorist10

    attacks were perpetrated not liable to sanctions, since they do not represent a11

    States decisions,12

    Noting that acts of nuclear terrorism may result in the gravest consequences and13

    may pose a threat to international peace and security,14

    Upholding the respect to the national sovereignty of all member States,15

    Noting also that existing multilateral legal provisions do not adequately address16

    those attacks,17

    Being convincedof the urgent need to enhance international cooperation18

    between States in devising and adopting effective and practical measures for the19

    prevention of such acts of terrorism and for the prosecution and punishment of20

    their perpetrators,21

    Noting that the activities of military forces of States are governed by rules of22

    international law outside of the framework of this Convention and that the23

    exclusion of certain actions from the coverage of this Convention does not24

    condone or make lawful otherwise unlawful acts, or preclude prosecution under25

    other laws,26

    27

    1. Decidesthat the sanctions in this resolution shall not apply to States, where28

    the offence is committed within a single State, the alleged offender and the29

    victims are nationals of that State, or if the alleged offender is found in the30

    territory of that State,31

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    5/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: Russia

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.3

    2. Calls upon member States to take all practicable measures to prevent and32

    prohibit in their territories illegal activities of persons, groups and organizations33

    that encourage, organize finance or provide technical assistance in the34

    perpetration of terrorist activities,35

    3. RequestsStates Parties to exchange accurate and verified information in36

    accordance with their national law, and coordinate measures as appropriate to37

    detect, prevent, suppress and investigate the offences presented in this38

    resolution,39

    4. Specifiesthat States Parties shall not be required to provide any information40

    which they are not permitted to communicate pursuant to national law or which41

    would jeopardize the security of the State concerned or the physical protection42

    of nuclear material43

    5. EncouragesStates Parties to make every effort to adopt appropriate measures44

    to ensure the protection of fissile material, taking into account recommendations45

    of the International Atomic Energy Agency;46

    6. RecommendsStates Parties in possession of nuclear devices or facilities to47

    take steps to render them harmless, and ensure that any nuclear material is held48

    in accordance with applicable International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards;49

    7. Requeststhe States Parties involved in the disposition or retention of any50

    radioactive material to inform the Director General of the International Atomic51

    Energy Agency of the manner in which such an item was disposed of or retained52

    8. Calls upon the States Parties to carry out their obligations regarding this53

    matter in consistency with the principles of sovereign equality and territorial54

    integrity of States and that of non-intervention in the domestic affairs of other55

    States.56

    9. Decidesto remain actively seized on the matter.57

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    6/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: Ukraine

    SIGNATORIES: Germany, United Kingdom, Argentina, Uganda, Turkey, Pakistan,

    France

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.4

    Noting with utmost concern the present situation regarding the mishandling and1

    misuse of nuclear armaments by governments and external parties, respectively,2

    leading to threats towards international peace and security,3

    Aware of the threats towards international peace and security should said4

    holding facilities be breached by unwanted parties,5

    Fully aware ofthe controversies surrounding the inspection of nuclear material6

    stockpiles in its security,7

    Noting with respectthe national sovereignty of all member nations,8

    Concerned with the continued development of nuclear arsenals and the threat to9

    international peace and security it brings,10

    Recognizing a lack of international standards to be met by facilities holding11

    nuclear material,12

    Fully acknowledging the need for nations to employ nuclear materials in the13

    production of electricity and peaceful purposes,14

    Further acknowledging the need for nations to employ nuclear armaments in15

    self-defense and national security,16

    Realising thatso long as NWS employ nuclear weapons as a threat, that non-State17

    actors will be able to derive a rationale for acquiring nuclear weapons in18

    response,19

    Emphasizing that so long as NWS maintain a stockpile of nuclear weapons and20

    fissile material, non-State actors will be able to steal weapons or acquire fissile21

    material to construct one,22

    Determined in resolving this issue of nuclear terrorism,23

    Confident thatall nations will take responsibility in ensuring the eradication of24

    nuclear terrorism to the best of their abilities,25

    26

    1. Strongly recommends the creation of an independent United Nations27

    Nuclear Weaponry Governance and Anti-Terrorism Subcommittee28

    (UNNuWGATS) to have the purposes of:29

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    7/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: Ukraine

    SIGNATORIES: Germany, United Kingdom, Argentina, Uganda, Turkey, Pakistan,

    France

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.4

    a) maintaining a stockpile of governed nuclear material in nations30

    including but not limited to (herein named nuclear materials), and31

    to be reviewed upon at the discretion of the NuWGATS:32

    i) Nuclear-based bombs and missiles33

    ii) Thermonuclear weapons34

    iii) Nuclear submarines35

    iv) Nuclear Explosives36

    v) Raw masses of radioactive metals as listed by the37

    IAEA38

    vi) Fissile materials39

    b) assist the IAEA in providing international safeguards against40

    nuclear proliferation41

    c) assisting nations in the application and enforcement of42

    legislation prohibiting the acquisition, use or threat of use of43

    nuclear weapons by both State and non-State actors,44

    d) determine the international standards for the appropriate45

    safeguarding of nuclear armaments and fissile materials, and46

    review said requirements biannually,47

    e) inspect regularly, at least biannually, if there is appropriate48

    security at nuclear material holding facilities and:49

    i) issue warnings to nations without appropriate security,50

    ii) advise on measures in improving the strength of said51

    security;52

    f) be a platform for discussion between regional bodies and the53

    Security Council;54

    2. Urgesnations to support universal transparency of nuclear activity by:55

    a) creating independent ombudsmen within each country56

    specifically dealing with nuclear terrorism within a 9 month57

    period of this resolution being passed,58

    i) where these ombudsmen will submit to the UNNuWGATS59quarterly reports including but not limited to:60

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    8/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: Ukraine

    SIGNATORIES: Germany, United Kingdom, Argentina, Uganda, Turkey, Pakistan,

    France

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.4

    a) Inventory of nuclear materials equivalent to61

    clause 1a,62

    b) Log of nuclear materials usage,63

    c) Security report of all nuclear material holding64

    facilities,65

    d) Log of all import/export of nuclear material;66

    ii) where governments are obligated to send 0.031% of67

    their GDP in maintaining the integrity of their respective68

    ombudsmen;69

    b) allowing the monitoring of their nuclear stockpile by the70

    NuWGATS:71

    i) Which is required to submit biannual reports to the72

    Security Council regarding this issue,73

    ii) Which grants the Security Council the right to review and74

    adjust the goals, proceedings and aims of said75

    Subcommittee;76

    3. Authorizes the creation of the United Nations Nuclear Security Fund77

    (NuSeF), directing to the NuWGATS, aided by the voluntary contribution78

    of developed countries in assisting nations without the financial79

    capability to appropriately safeguard nuclear armaments or fissile80

    materials (clause 4) to strengthen their security, overseen by the81

    NuWGATS,82

    4. Further urges nations without the financial capability to appropriately83

    (see Clause 1d) safeguard nuclear armaments or fissile materials to84

    achieve one of the following within 3 months of the primary NuWGATS85

    inspection:86

    a) Surrender entire stockpile of nuclear material to the NuWGATS87

    for further treatment,88

    b) Seek financial aid through the NuSeF via the NuWGATS to89

    improve security at nuclear material holding facilities;905. Encourages all member states to invest in efforts in:91

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    9/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: Ukraine

    SIGNATORIES: Germany, United Kingdom, Argentina, Uganda, Turkey, Pakistan,

    France

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.4

    a) The implementation of the NPT for Nuclear Weapon States,92

    b) Educating the younger generation in the dangers of misuse of93

    nuclear armaments,94

    c) Endorsing the Nuclear Terrorism Awareness Day in Clause 6;95

    6. Recommends the Security Council fully implement the UN Security96

    Council Resolution 1540, to take and enforce effective measures against97

    the proliferation of WMD, their means of delivery and related materials,98

    and ensure that no State or non-State actor is a source or beneficiary of99

    WMD proliferation;100

    7. Proclaims a Nuclear Terrorism Awareness Day, the date to be agreed by101

    all member states of the UN, to spread awareness to the general public102

    about the issue of nuclear terrorism;103

    8. Encourages the Security Council to impose economic sanctions to104

    nations deliberately and without legitimate reason:105

    a) Refusing NuWGATS monitoring and inspection,106

    b) Not employing appropriate security measures for nuclear107

    material holding facilities,108

    c) Harbouring undeclared nuclear material,109

    d) Failing to maintain the integrity of their respective ombudsmen,110

    e) Ratify the NPT,111

    f) Fully ratify the UNSCR 1540;112

    9. Endeavourscountries to resolve conflicts regarding national security in113

    order to finalize this treaty and to take a step further in enforcing114

    international peace and security;115

    10. Decides to remain actively seized on the matter.116

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    10/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: United Kingdom, Germany, Argentina, Israel, Turkey

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.5

    Recognising the rising significance of nuclear terrorism as a global threat;1

    Acknowledging that the usage of radioactive materials for civilian purposes2

    provides openings for the materials necessary for nuclear terrorism to fall into3

    terrorist hands;4

    Understanding the need for transparency with regards to act involving5

    radioactive materials both within borders and on a transnational basis;6

    7

    Reaffirming the role of the IAEA in promoting the use of nuclear energy for8

    peaceful purposes;9

    Realising the dangerous nature of using enriched nuclear materials classified as10

    weapons-usable for civilian purposes;11

    Regarding the free flow of highly-enriched nuclear materials in black markets12

    around the world as a serious global threat;13

    Noting that fissile materials enriched to only a low degree suffice for civilian14

    purposes;15

    Appreciating that some circumstances involving scientific purposes such as16

    research may require the small-scale production and usage of highly enriched17

    fissile materials;18

    Applauding the current efforts undertaken by bodies including the IAEA and the19

    NTI to combat nuclear terrorism;20

    Respecting that countries should have a degree of confidentiality with regards to21

    the disclosure of information regarding nuclear-related activities;22

    Advocating that the United Nations as well as other relevant bodies should play23

    an active role, due to their mission goal, to save succeeding generations from the24

    scourge of war;25

    Ascertaining the importance of preventing the information needed to construct a26

    nuclear weapon or create weapons-grade fissile materials from falling into27

    terrorist hands;28

    29

    1. Urges the monitoring by sovereign governments of the sale of any30

    isotopes capable of causing radiological terror through a nuclear or dirty bomb;31

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    11/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: United Kingdom, Germany, Argentina, Israel, Turkey

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.5

    a. Recommends nations to monitor the transfer of the following32

    isotopes capable of being made into a dirty bomb: americium-241, californium-33

    252, caesium-137, cobalt-60, iridium-192, plutonium-238, polonium-210,34

    radium-226 and strontium-90;35

    i) Promotes the creation of a country-wide database where all36

    sales of these materials must be recorded;37

    b. Requires nations to implement strict controls with regards to the38

    trading and movement of fissile material, including thorium, caesium, plutonium39

    and uranium, by:40

    i) maintaining high standards of security and communication41

    with regards to cross-border transactions to avoid problems caused by42

    miscommunication;43

    ii) providing increased levels of security and subtlety for44

    transactions within a nations borders;45

    iii) declaring planned international transactions to the United46

    Nations Security Council so as to promote transparency with regards to the47

    acquisition of fissile materials to a reasonable extent of detail;48

    2. Requires the strict regulation of the sale and trade of enriched and highly49

    enriched fissile materials, in particular uranium;50

    a. Urges the banning of the production and trading of highly enriched51

    uranium for civilian usage;52

    i) Recommends countries to declare current amounts of highly53

    enriched uranium;54

    b. Urges the improved security of facilities storing nuclear materials,55

    in light of stolen materials appearing on the black market;56

    i) Advocates that national governments oversee municipal57

    governing bodies in matters involving the protection of fissile materials;58

    c. Requires for any usage or preparation of highly enriched fissile59

    materials for scientific and research purposes to be declared to the United60

    Nations Security Council in advance;61

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    12/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: United Kingdom, Germany, Argentina, Israel, Turkey

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.5

    3. Calls for international transparency when carrying out activities relating62

    to radioactive material;63

    a. Recommends that countries submit a brief record detailing all64

    major activities relating to the use of special nuclear materials (i.e. fissile65

    materials) for civilian/scientific usage;66

    b. Calls fornations to immediately report any losses of control over67

    fissile materials or significant amounts of radioactive materials in order for a68

    cohesive global response to be formulated;69

    4. Stresses the importance of the protection of any and all information70

    relating to the nature and location of fissile materials;71

    a. Urges that any countries possessing information regarding the72

    creation of a nuclear weapon or processes involved in creating weapons-grade73

    fissile material take extra security measures to ensure that the information is not74

    divulged;75

    b. Stresses that Private Sector Organisations that handle nuclear76

    stockpiles should have the right to speak at and consult the Subcommittee, to77

    enhance cooperation between all organizations on this issue;78

    5. Advocates the establishment of a new sub-committee to be created under79

    the Conference for Disarmament (the CD), to be called the UN Nuclear Terrorism80

    Prevention Committee (UN NTPC), for the purpose of providing a platform for81

    future discussions and collaborations regarding nuclear terrorism;82

    a. Resolves to unify existing organisations acting against nuclear83

    terrorism under a single umbrella organisation (to be referred to as the United84

    Nations Alliance Against Radioactive Threats [UN AART]);85

    i) Recommends that the members of AART (be voted upon by86

    the nations participating in the NTPC;87

    ii) Asks fortasks involving these organisations collected under88

    AART to be shared between the organisations in a manner to be decided upon by89

    the NTPC;90

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    13/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: United Kingdom, Germany, Argentina, Israel, Turkey

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.5

    iii) Requires for member organizations of AART to maintain91

    communications between both themselves and related governmental and UN92

    bodies;93

    b. Calls for individual states to settle radioactive material-related94

    disputes through the NTPC, of which such discussions could involve:95

    i) the illegal obtaining or trade of radioactive materials or96

    SNMs by terrorist organizations;97

    ii) the obtaining of radioactive materials or SNMs from failed98

    states or collapsed governments;99

    c. Requests the AART to act as a UN watchdog;100

    i) Calls forthe monitoring of both suspected nuclear terrorist101

    activities and public activities being carried out by governments, particularly102

    those extending across borders;103

    iv) Recommends that the AART keep track of all trade records104

    of nuclear materials105

    d. Promotes the NPTC as a platform for the discussion of the106

    international regulations involving nuclear activities that could further the107

    threat of nuclear terrorism;108

    ii) recommends that the committee meet both in times of need109

    as well as on a 2-year basis to discuss any changes that may be needed to global110

    regulations;111

    iii) requests that the AART advises the NPTC on these updates112

    to regulations;113

    6. Urges for governments to recognise the growing significance of nuclear114

    activities carried out by the private sector;115

    a. Requires regional bodies to regulate such activity through:116

    i) collaborating with other member nations to create a117

    cohesive, well-defined set of restrictions to be placed upon the private sector;118

    ii) regularly inspecting all private-sector facilities on a119

    biannual basis;120

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    14/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: United Kingdom, Germany, Argentina, Israel, Turkey

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.5

    iii) requiring private sector companies to submit full and121

    detailed reports on all aspects of their activity to the governing body of their122

    country;123

    iv) urges countries to act upon any suspicious or seemingly124

    mendacious activity as gleaned from the aforementioned reports;125

    v) urges the establishment of rules to govern physical126

    security of nuclear materials, civil and fissile, emphasizing these rules shall also127

    govern Private Sector Organizations handling nuclear materials128

    vi) urges countries to establish protocols to govern the129

    transportation of nuclear materials130

    b. Stresses the growing risk of a large black market in radioactive131

    materials as a legitimate one, and urges countries to tackle this via:132

    i) monitoring all known and suspected illicit trading of133

    nuclear activity by members of the private sector;134

    ii) allowing local task forces the ability to deal with of areas135

    suspected to be involved in the illicit trading of radioactive materials through136

    both force and technology;137

    iii) offering local task forces a direct line to call the overarching138

    government for support in the cases of suspected large volumes of the illegal139

    trading of radioactive materials, in particular those where special nuclear140

    materials may be involved or potential retaliation is suspected;141

    iv) enforcing stricter border controls and security to prevent142

    private-sector cross-border dealings and potentially devastating consequences143

    that may arise from such transactions;144

    v) providing customs and border control authorities with145

    geiger counters and other detectors of radiation for the purpose of detecting146

    radioactive materials;147

    7. Advocates the creation of a set of internationally recognised disaster-148

    response protocols for the purpose of preparing local authorities for cases of149

    nuclear terrorism;150

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    15/30

    QUESTION OF: Nuclear Terrorism

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: United Kingdom, Germany, Argentina, Israel, Turkey

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1.5

    a. Urges municipal governments to provide local authorities with the151

    adequate materials and training to be able to cope with small-scale radiological152

    terrorist attacks, including;153

    b. Stresses the need for governments to provide their national154

    defense systems with the tools necessary to deal with large-scale attacks on155

    behalf on nuclear terrorists in terms of disaster relief in particular;156

    c. Calls forneighbouring countries to offer assistance with recovery157

    in the times after nuclear terrorists attacks, should they occur;158

    d. Recommends that plans of action be established regarding the159

    event of thievery of nuclear materials to160

    i) recapture the nuclear materials161

    ii)prevent radioactive leakage, both intentional or accidental,162

    iii) prevent possible detonation,163

    e. Recommends that countries collaborate to create such protocols;164

    8. Decides to remain actively seized in the matter.165

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    16/30

    QUESTION OF: Cooperation between the UN and Regional Bodies

    SUBMITTER: China

    SIGNATORIES: Russia, Argentina, Turkey

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2.1

    Understanding the increasing importance of regional bodies in global politics,1

    particularly in crisis resolution,2

    Alarmedby the loss of life and property incurred by logistically uncoordinated3

    actions between the UN and regional bodies,4

    Encouraging increase of communication between the UN and regional bodies,5

    Hoping that regional bodies will recognize the UN as the supreme forum for6

    international, cross-cultural communication and a valuable resource for conflict7

    resolution,8

    9

    1 Urges the Security Council to establish a UN Subcommittee on10Coordination of Regional Bodies (UNCRB) with a mandate to:11

    a organize regional bodies requests and carry out resource12allocation,13

    b craft timetables for cooperative missions,14c coordinate joint workshops targeted at sharing best practices,15d convene annually to analyze regional actions and potentially16

    amend the methods in which the UN cooperates with regional17

    organizations;18

    2 Further urges the UNCRB to create an appropriate set of rules governing19the relationship between the UN and regional bodies, including that:20

    a the Security Council holds supreme authority should any21disagreements between regional bodies and the UN occur,22

    b regional bodies retain sovereignty, which will not be infringed23upon unless a majority vote of the Security Council with approval24

    of the P5 nations deems that the such an organizations actions are25

    violate human rights or international security,26

    c Security Council guarantees the representation of regional bodies27in discussions that involve matters of their respective regions;28

    3 Recommends that regional bodies report major proposed actions, with29the exception of actions in response to crisis situations, to the UNCRB for30

    initial approval and referral to the appropriate UN committee in order to:31

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    17/30

    QUESTION OF: Cooperation between the UN and Regional Bodies

    SUBMITTER: China

    SIGNATORIES: Russia, Argentina, Turkey

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2.1

    a foster the legitimacy of these actions under the international eye,32b allow for sharing of resources, particularly personnel, for the33

    duration of the proposed actions,34

    c provide a better understanding of regional issues to the UN;354 Requests that regional bodies bring proposals for resolution of crisis36

    situations directly to the Security Council (without going through the37

    UNCRB), in order to increase efficiency of crisis response, such that the38

    Security Council can:39

    a issue a mandate to the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations40for personnel and equipment if such resources are deemed41

    necessary,42

    b urge member nations with sufficient capability to contribute to the43response effort, such that individual nations can contribute in the44

    most conducive way,45

    c create a strategic planning group with representatives from all46major organizations involved, for continued cooperation after47

    initial proposal approval,48

    d keep involved parties informed of crisis developments in an49efficient manner;50

    5 Emphasizes the need to reform existing peacekeeping operations by51increasing cooperation between such forces under the UN and regional52

    bodies, through means such as but not limited to:53

    a enforcing a common code of conduct among regional and UN54peacekeeping forces,55

    b standardizing terminology in order to minimize possible56misunderstandings;57

    6 Recommends improvements in transparency between regional58organizations and the United Nations in the form of mutual accessibility59

    of technical information including:60

    a military capabilities of regional organizations and functional61support required,62

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    18/30

    QUESTION OF: Cooperation between the UN and Regional Bodies

    SUBMITTER: China

    SIGNATORIES: Russia, Argentina, Turkey

    SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2.1

    b geographical proximities including conflict-prone zones, conflict63enclaves and peacekeeping support bases,64

    c social conformities: providence of social demographics on the65basis of:66

    d technological capacity,67e time frameworks;68

    7 Affirms the need for regional bodies to have observer status in UN69committees while their proposals are being debated, in order to present70

    details regarding proposed actions and express their views;71

    8 Decides to remain actively seized on the matter.7273

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    19/30

    QUESTION OF: Cooperation between the UN and Regional Bodies

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL 2.2

    Recalling with alarm previous failed attempts to moderate the civil war in Liberia1

    and Sierra Leone with the regional body ECOWAS, resulting in the withdrawal of2

    ECOWAS troops and a failure to alleviate the crisis;3

    Recognizing the success of NATO and UN cooperation in the crisis of Libya, which4

    involved the participation of multi-state coalition military intervention in an5

    attempt to implement the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, and6

    resulting in the removal of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi;7

    Noting with concern the sharp decline incorporation between the regional bodies8

    and the UN;9

    Noting with concern the sharp incline in regional conflicts with international10

    implications;11

    Regretting the loss of human life as a consequence of such lack of cooperation12

    between the UN and relevant regional bodies;13

    Alarmed by poor logistics, inefficient communication which are the causes of14

    failures in interregional body and UN cooperation;15

    Bearing in mind that such causes of the lack of cooperation could be solved by a16

    framework for the UN and other such regional bodies to abide by, leading to future17

    successes in joint efforts on the part of the UN and any body of regional jurisdiction18

    that it may concern;19

    Stressing the importance of setting guidelines to ensure cooperation is encouraged20

    and easy to participate in;21

    Noting with regret that the loss of human life in areas with international conflicts,22

    which could be remedied by a joint effort on UN and regional bodies, could be easily23

    averted;24

    Desiring a more cooperative UN, and the faster and more efficient response in25

    areas of regional conflicts which concern the international community;26

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    20/30

    QUESTION OF: Cooperation between the UN and Regional Bodies

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL 2.2

    27

    1. Calls for member states to acknowledge the right of regional bodies to work in28

    their areas of jurisdiction with high level of autonomy, as long as such autonomy29

    is in compliance with the United Nations Charter;30

    2. Further calls for the formal representation and recognition of regional bodies31

    in the UN in the form of advisory delegations:32

    a) To be represented in a UN committee in which they are pertained to;33

    3. Endorses the creation of treaties between the UN and regional bodies, to34

    include guidelines to help international cooperation, and to be overseen by the35

    subcommittee as stated in this resolution; such cooperation may encompass36

    responsibilities including but not limited to:37

    a) Maintenance of regional stability,38

    b) Economic collaboration,39

    c) Protection and the championing of human rights;40

    4. Recommendsthe incorporation of regional bodies into the solving of regional41

    crises in order to achieve a more nuanced approach by methods such as, but not42

    limited to:43

    a) Relative regional bodies acting a conduit through which the UN and the44

    areas of conflict,45

    5 Emphasizes the right of regional bodies to retain autonomy. Regional bodies46

    reserve the rights to:47

    a) Retain jurisdiction,48

    b) Be selective regarding the requests of UN,49

    c) Not be made directly accountable to the UN;50

    6. Further endorses the formation of a subcommittee (UNREGCO) with the51

    responsibility of coordinating:52

    a) Bi-annual meetings between representatives of the UN and regional53

    bodies on issues pertaining to international importance:54

    i) Meetings can be called for within short notice should the need of it55

    arise, b) The UN should be dully notified should the regional bodies decide to56

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    21/30

    QUESTION OF: Cooperation between the UN and Regional Bodies

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL 2.2

    undertake intervention, be they of social, economic or military nature in a57

    particular area,58

    ii) Appointments of 5 persons representing the UN, (if any issue were to59

    arise that may involve large number of regional bodies when deemed necessary,60

    additional members may be added ad hoc),61

    iii) Representatives will be nominated by the United Nations and voted62

    upon by the General Assembly,63

    b) Representatives from each regional body should not exceed 2 delegates,64

    i) Such representatives should not also hold positions in the UN so as to65

    eliminate possible conflict of interest;66

    7. Calls for basic guidelines to be set on all matters of cooperation between67

    regional bodies68

    and the UN, including but not limited to:69

    a) The use of peacekeepers or the soldiers of regional bodies, in cases of70

    regional conflict,71

    b) The method to which decisions are made on behalf of the UN in regards72

    with UN cooperation with regional bodies, including but not limited it:73

    i) The agreement on a decision,74

    ii) The potential affect made by the permanent members of the SC, should75

    they veto a consensus,76

    c) The method to how the parties are to communicate,77

    d) Training of people through the UN Peace Corps;78

    8. Decides to remain actively seized on the matter.79

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    22/30

    QUESTION OF: Situation in Mali

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: Republic of Turkey, Russian Federation, Republic of Uganda,

    Republic of China, Republic of South Africa

    SECURITY COUNCIL 3.1

    Topic: The Situation in Mali1

    Council: Security Council2

    3

    Deeply concernedby the threat posed by terrorist and militant groups in Mali to4

    stability in north-western Africa, as well as the humanitarian situation and5

    refugee crisis in affected areas,6

    7

    Fully aware of the influence of al-Qaeda in the direction and sponsorship of the8

    forceful takeover of northern Mali by militants,9

    10

    Alarmed by the ability of insurgents to seize weapons from Libyan arsenals,11

    available after the fall of Muammar Gaddafi,12

    13

    Noting the issue of naturally arising tensions between ethnic and political groups14

    within Mali, resulting in conflict, regional instability and leaving a vacuum open15

    to exploitation by the AQIM,16

    17

    Recalling the relative success of African forces against insurgency in Somalia in18

    2006,19

    20

    Taking into consideration the uprooting of thousands of civilians due to the21

    clashes in the North, along with the proliferation of armed groups, drought and22

    political instability,23

    Strongly regretting the unauthorised imposition of a dictatorial regime based on24

    extremist beliefs in northern Mali,25

    26

    Recalling the 2012 resolution adopted by the U.N. Security Council, authorizing27

    the deployment of the African-led International Support Mission in Mali28

    (AFISMA), condemning the continued political interference by members of the29

    Malian military with the civilian government and calling for efforts to bring30

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    23/30

    QUESTION OF: Situation in Mali

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: Republic of Turkey, Russian Federation, Republic of Uganda,

    Republic of China, Republic of South Africa

    SECURITY COUNCIL 3.1

    perpetrators of human rights abuses and violations of international31

    humanitarian law in Mali to justice,32

    33

    Recognising that the destabilisation and broadening insurgency has spread to34

    neighbouring countries to Mali, such as Algeria, Chad, Niger and Mauritania, and35

    to the general region of the Sahel,36

    37

    Condemning the kidnapping of hostages, with particular regard to foreign38

    diplomats, in the afflicted area surrounding Mali, as a method of delivering a39

    political message,40

    41

    Appreciating the foreign military, strategic and/or humanitarian aid provided by42

    countries such as Nigeria, Chad, Canada, France, Italy, the United States and the43

    United Kingdom,44

    45

    1. Condemns the illegal actions committed by both the AQIM and Malian army46

    against civilians, the abuse of human rights and imposition of the rigid-theocratic47

    al-Sharias law,48

    a) Recommends the implementation of force protection mechanisms,49

    including but not limited to the stationing of African Union- or50

    Malian troops in Malian population centres,51

    b) Insists that the Malian authorities protect civilians residing in Mali to52

    the best of their ability,53

    c) Completely rejects the establishment of an unauthorized state in54

    northern Mali by insurgents and the unlawful control it exerts on civilians,55

    d) Strongly urges for the immediate withdrawal of rigid-theocratic56

    Sharias law from the aforementioned regions,57

    e) Calls forany authorised forces to hold perpetrators of international58

    humanitarian law violations in Mali accountable to their actions,59

    60

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    24/30

    QUESTION OF: Situation in Mali

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: Republic of Turkey, Russian Federation, Republic of Uganda,

    Republic of China, Republic of South Africa

    SECURITY COUNCIL 3.1

    2. Callsfordialogue between AQIM in the North and the Bamako government.61

    a) Recommends working with regional governments to increase their62

    capability, foster regional cooperation, and counter violent extremism,63

    b) Endorses the Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership, a military64

    and civilian interagency program with a more specified strategic design65

    extending traditional bilaterial aid,66

    67

    3. Calls for democratic elections to be held in Mali by April, and for a68

    representative and inclusive government to replace the current interim69

    government.70

    a) Supports the deployment of a team of neutral observers into Mali under71

    an U.N. mission, to observe the transition in political leadership,72

    b) Bans the terrorist groups, AQIM and the Ansar Dine, from running in73

    these elections74

    c) Emphasizes the necessity of having a single, sustainable political body75

    in control of the entirety of Mali,76

    77

    4. Requires the gradual withdrawal of French troops and for the African Union78

    and ECOWAS to increasingly take a leading role in Mali,79

    a) Encourages security duties to be gradually handed over to Malian and80

    West African troops,81

    b) Calls forFrench troops, at the basic minimum, to remain in Mali until82

    insurgents and al-Qaeda affiliates are completely expelled from the country,83

    c) Initial stages of French withdrawal should occur by84

    d) Mandates a thorough and continuous crackdown on al-Qaeda-allied85

    insurgents in proximity to Mali, either by local or foreign forces,86

    87

    5. Supports the coordination of foreign military and strategic aid against88

    insurgents in Mali, in the interests of promoting efficiency and unity,89

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    25/30

    QUESTION OF: Situation in Mali

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: Republic of Turkey, Russian Federation, Republic of Uganda,

    Republic of China, Republic of South Africa

    SECURITY COUNCIL 3.1

    a) Recommends the funneling of net aid into the U.N.-mandated African90

    peacekeeping force that is currently fighting alongside the Malian Army,91

    b) Officially authorizes foreign intervention in Mali, as long as it has been92

    previously approved by the Security Council and is solely for the purpose of93

    peacekeeping and/or assisting the resistance effort against insurgents,94

    c) Encourages member states to provide voluntary contributions, if so95

    desired, in the form of military training, sharing of intelligence, logistical support96

    or humanitarian aid,97

    6. Encourages Mali or other friendly countries to implement protection measures98

    for important cultural heritage in areas of potential conflict, especially those99

    recognized by UNESCO,100

    a) Calls for deployment of UN peacekeepers to these areas in order to101

    improve the security of these UNESCO world heritage sites,102

    103

    7. Condemnsthe coup detat conducted by the Malian military authorities in 2012104

    in response to a Tuareg separatist movement, resulting in the ousting of a105

    legitimately elected president,106

    8. Reaffirms U.N. support for the deployment of the African-led International107

    Support Mission in Mali (AFISMA), to contribute to Malian efforts aiming for re-108

    establishing authority over their territory,109

    a) Recommends the usage of contributions to rebuild the capacity of the110

    Malian Defense and Security Forces,111

    b) Emphasizes the need for military planning to be refined before the112

    commencement a possible offensive operation under the guidance of the UN113

    Security Council and Secretary General,114

    9. Establishes a U.N. committee responsible for oversight of political progress in115

    Mali, and for aiding the Security Council in decision-making concerning Mali,116

    through provision of information and intelligence,117

    a) Recommends the committee to send bi-weekly reports to the Security118

    Council, with details and updates on the situation in Mali,119

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    26/30

    QUESTION OF: Situation in Mali

    SUBMITTER: United States

    SIGNATORIES: Republic of Turkey, Russian Federation, Republic of Uganda,

    Republic of China, Republic of South Africa

    SECURITY COUNCIL 3.1

    b) Deploys U.N. officials and peacekeepers onto the field in Mali,120

    c) Authorises officials to guide and oversee democratic progress within121

    the Malian government system,122

    d) Calls for transparency measures to be delivered in all forms to the123

    Security Council on a weekly basis,124

    125

    10. Affirms the need to track, monitor and remove arsenals of weapons leftover126

    from previous conflicts in African states, through means including but not127

    limited to:128

    a) Reinforcement of international measures already in place, including the129

    United Nations Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in130

    Firearms and the ECOWAS Convention on Small Arms and Light Weapons, their131

    Ammunition and other Related Materials,132

    b) Stipulation of stricter controls on the transfer, manufacture, possession133

    and security of small arms and light weapons between African states,134

    135

    11. Decides to remain actively seized on the matter.136

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    27/30

    QUESTION OF: Situation in Mali

    SUBMITTER: France

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL 3.2

    Noting with concern that militants and mercenaries armed from the1

    employment of the fallen Libyan dictator Qaddafi, currently jeopardise the2

    stability of northwestern Africa, in particular the state of Mali,3

    Alarmed that these militants are directly sponsored and supported by the4

    globally outlawed, belligerent Islam al-Qaeda terrorists in an attempt to5

    forcefully take over the northern regions of Mali,6

    Condemning the unlawful and unauthorised militarisation of such7

    mercenaries with interests to propagate an autocratic, totalitarian reign of terror8

    in adherence to extremist beliefs,9

    Fully aware of the long-term detriments to the infrastructure, society, and10

    political stability of the state of Mali as a result of a continuous lack of11

    intervention and regulation,12

    Recalling the definition of terrorism under Security Council Resolution 156613

    as criminal acts committed with the intent to cause death or serious bodily14

    injury, or taking of hostages, with the purpose to provoke a state of terror in the15

    general public,16

    Taking into consideration the universally championed endeavour of17

    eradicating and subduing vehement terrorist groups under the 2001 Security18

    Council Resolution 1373,19

    Regretting that domestic tensions between malevolent groups with vested20

    interests within Mali have pervaded and escalated into grave regional instability21

    and violence, no less epitomised by the recent kidnappings of foreign diplomats22

    in neighbouring nations,23

    Seeking a conclusion to the reproachable violation of human rights and their24

    progress in Mali and elsewhere in the African Sahel as a result of militarisation25

    by the fallen Qaddafi regime:26

    1. Strongly condemns the separatist movement of the Tuareg ethnic group of27

    MNLA, the Islamic militant group supported by the terrorist organization Al-28

    Qaeda, Ansar Eddie, and the large-scale unrest instigated by these malicious29

    groups of twisted intents, particularly embodied in the events of:30

    a. The ousting of President Amadou Toure31

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    28/30

    QUESTION OF: Situation in Mali

    SUBMITTER: France

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL 3.2

    b. The coup detat in 201232

    c. The brutal abuses and exploitation of human rights;33

    2. Reaffirms the importance of maintaining a singular and politically34

    sustainable control of the state of Mali so as to avoid political radicalisation with35

    vested interests by unjustified terrorist organisations, and of cracking down, in a36

    united manner, on mercenaries supported or affiliated with al-Qaeda;37

    3. Authorises and supports the righteous intervention of members of the38

    Security Council, such as the French Republic, in order to assist the Mali39

    government in its resistance efforts and for peacekeeping purposes, in the forms40

    including but not limited to:41

    a. Artillery fire42

    b. Air strikes43

    c. Provision of:44

    i. Military training45

    ii. Military equipment46

    iii. Soldiers;47

    4. Strongly condemns and denounces the illegitimate state established by Islam48

    radicals in northern Mali, and henceforth refers to such groups as solely49

    insurgents with no authorised or rational justification to their unlawful control50

    of the Northern regions;51

    5. Establishes a committee reporting directly to and under the command of the52

    United Nations Security Council, with the transitional title of Committee of53

    Peacekeeping in Mali and Sahel Africa (CPMSA), with the responsibility of:54

    a. Producing a weekly report on the progress of peacekeeping and55

    repression of Islam extremists,56

    b. Conferring on a long-term political solution appropriate for Mali,57

    through consultation of parties including but not limited to:58

    i. The transitional Mali government59

    ii. Representatives from the United Nations60

    iii. Representatives from the African Union61

    iv. Representatives from the NATO62

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    29/30

    QUESTION OF: Situation in Mali

    SUBMITTER: France

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL 3.2

    c. Actively discussing any other events of interests with the Security63

    Council, until:64

    i. Three months have elapsed, upon which another Security Council65

    meeting must be called, or66

    ii. Otherwise deemed appropriate by the Security Council;67

    6. Reiterates the validity of Security Council resolution 2071 passed by the68

    Council in October 2012, affirming the absolute necessity for the Transitional69

    authorities of Mali, the Malian rebel groups, and legitimate representatives of the70

    local population in the north of Mali, to engage in a credible negotiation process71

    to seek a short-term ceasefire, under the supervision and hospice of:72

    a. The aforementioned CPMSA,73

    b. The African Union;74

    7. Affirms that the fulfillment of Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter75

    requires the establishment of a just and lasting stability and harmony in the76

    region, which should include the implementation of the following principles:77

    a. The immediate surrendering of the violent Islam activists, namely in78

    the identities including but not limited to:79

    i. Soldiers and officials,80

    ii. Political officers81

    iii. Military trainers82

    b. Termination of all claims or states of belligerency;83

    c. Respect for and acknowledgement of the territorial integrity of Mali,84

    and the right of the Mali people to live in peace within secure boundaries free85

    from threats or acts of aggression,86

    8. Demands the protection of Mali citizens by Mali authorities in currently87

    disputed regions to the best of their abilities:88

    a. Such that their human rights are not deprived or removed in any89

    manner by the rebels in the following formats:90

    i. Under vigilante mob justice,91

    ii. With extreme and inhumane torture;92

  • 7/29/2019 Nuclear Terrorism Resolutions

    30/30

    QUESTION OF: Situation in Mali

    SUBMITTER: France

    SIGNATORIES:

    SECURITY COUNCIL 3.2

    b. Under the close monitoring and supervision of the CPMSA, which has93

    the obligation to ensure that the above demands are met through regular checks94

    every week, with follow-up reports submitted to the General Assembly, until95

    deemed appropriate by the CPMSA;96

    9. Affirms the absolute responsibility and need for neighbouring African97

    countries to enforce their regulations and monitoring of the trading and flow of98

    arms, through the means including but not limited to:99

    a. Increased frequency of check-ups and inspections of vehicles suspected of100

    transporting arms or other potentially hazardous materials that can be exploited101

    for weaponry,102

    b. Increased installation of arms detectors and trained personnel to103

    regularly patrol regions where illegal arms trade is particularly proliferate,104

    c. Introduction of a transparent and cohesively monitored registration105

    system of arms, such that the arms within the area can be subject to the106

    monitoring by a wider public;107

    9. Advocates for severe penalties to any states, organisations, or NGOs who108

    have been discovered to be supporting the rebel groups in Northern Mali,109

    through the following forms:110

    a. Provision of military supplies, equipment, and personnel, or111

    b. Housing of recognised or apparent violent rebels;112

    10. Demands a just and rapid solution to similar crises surrounding Sahel113

    Africa.114

    11. Decides to remain actively seized on this matter.115