NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
-
Upload
emma-harvey -
Category
Documents
-
view
15 -
download
0
description
Transcript of NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
![Page 1: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
02-03-11
![Page 2: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2NSTXNSTX
Study Goals
2
• Purpose: To determine if the upgrade TF flex joint and bundle stub design
is adequate to meet the requirements of the NSTX Structural Design Criteria, specifically, the fatigue requirements of Section I-
4.2 for 60,000 full power cycles without failure. – Strap Lamellae
• Stresses
• Buckling
– Bolted Joints• Thread shear stress
• Contact status and pressure
![Page 3: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3NSTXNSTX
Outline
3
• Wire EDM Flex Strap and Joint Design– Flex Strap– Superbolt Jack-screw Tensioned Nut
• Analysis– Magnetostatic
• Magnetic Flux Density• Current Density
– Transient Thermal• Temperature
– Static Structural• Conductor Stress• Lamella Stress• Thread and Bolt Stress• Contact Pressure
• Development Tests• Conclusion
![Page 4: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4NSTXNSTX 4
![Page 5: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5NSTXNSTX
NSTX CSU Flex Strap with Applied Boundary Conditions
5
B tor = 2 T
I = 130 kA
Bvert= .24 T
Urad thermal = .018 in
Uvert thermal = .3 in
30 Lamellae:- .075” thick -.014” gap between lamella-Mat’l: Annealed C18150 H01 Cu-Cr-Zr
2”
2.523”
7.5”
Rin = 3.255”
Rout = 5.688”
5”Utor twist = .10 in
8x 5/8” Bolt Hole
Upper Umbrella Assy
![Page 6: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6NSTXNSTX
Flex Joint Design using Superbolt Jack-ScrewTensioned Nuts
6
![Page 7: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7NSTXNSTX
Superbolt Jack-Screw Tensioned Nut
7
SB8-062-11x6.00, Mat’l: Inconel 718 H.T.
• Advantages of using Superbolts– Easy Installation and removal of individual flex assemblies– Low torque required: ~ 11 ft-lbf– Smaller inner-radius of flex strap required, allows use of more
laminations, reducing the maximum lamination stress
![Page 8: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8NSTXNSTX
Coupled Maxwell Magnetostatic and ANSYS Transient Thermal/ Static Structural Analysis Block Diagram
8
Lorentz Forces
Heat Temp
Magnetostatics (Maxell)
Note: This sequential, one-way coupled analysis is only valid if the bolted joints do not separate, and if the electrical and thermal contact resistances are a weak function of contact pressure, which is true in this case if the minimum local contact pressure is above 1500 psi.
![Page 9: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9NSTXNSTX
SolidWorks Model of 3 Strap Assembly with Simplified OH, PF, and TF Coils
9
![Page 10: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10NSTXNSTX
Maxwell Magnetostatic Analysis: DM Solid Model310 Laminations/ Strap
10
![Page 11: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11NSTXNSTX
Maxwell Magnetostatic Results: Current DensityCurrent Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
11
![Page 12: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12NSTXNSTX
Maxwell Magnetostatic Results: Ohmic LossCurrent Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
12
![Page 13: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13NSTXNSTX
Maxwell Magnetostatic Results: Magnetic Flux DensityCurrent Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
13
Strap Br Bz BθMaxwell 1 -0.124 -0.234 -1.953
2 -0.123 -0.232 -1.9533 -0.123 -0.229 -1.954
R. Hatcher - -0.133 -0.290 -1.903
![Page 14: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Thermal and Structural Analysis Solid Model30 Laminations/ Strap
14
Superbolt pretension = 25000 lbf
Torqued-bolt pretension ~ 6700 lbf
![Page 15: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Thermal and Structural Analysis Mesh30 Laminations/ Strap
15
# Nodes = 2,468,759# Elements = 518,097
![Page 16: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16NSTXNSTX
Parts Common Between Maxwell and ANSYS Analysis30 Laminations/ Strap
16
![Page 17: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Transient Thermal Results: Temperature Current Scenario #82, 30 Laminations
17
![Page 18: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: Tresca Stress 1Current Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
18
![Page 19: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: Tresca Stress 2Current Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
19
![Page 20: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: Tresca Stress 4Current Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
20
![Page 21: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: Lamination Tresca StressCurrent Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap, Center Strap
21
![Page 22: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
![Page 23: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: Joint Tresca StressCurrent Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
23
![Page 24: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
![Page 25: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
![Page 26: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: 5/8” Bolted Contact PressureCurrent Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
26
Min. Pressure ~ 4500 psi
![Page 27: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: 3/8” Bolted Contact PressureCurrent Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
27
Min. Pressure ~ 2500 psi
![Page 28: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28NSTXNSTX
Flex Strap and Bolted Joint Design Verification Tests
28
• Tests Performed at 3 Different Levels– Material Level
• C18150 H01 fatigue strength (R0)– Stub Joint Level
• HeliCoil insert pull-out strength in C18150 copper stub, static and fatigue• Inconel 718 custom Superbolt nut/ stud fatigue strength
– Flex Strap Assembly Level• Manufacturability• In-plane bending stiffness• Cyclic, simulated maximum combined loads• Contact pressure distribution
– Bolt pretension only– Bolt pretension + simulated maximum combined-load
• Superbolt nut tensioned in umbrella segment mock-up
![Page 29: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29NSTXNSTX
Conclusions
29
1. Lamination Stress: Excluding singularities, the maximum Tresca stress in the laminations is 18.9 ksi. To
satisfy the requires of the NSTX Structural Design Criteria, the fatigue strength at 60 K cycles must be greater than twice this stress, or the fatigue strength at 1.2 E06 cycles (20x N) must be equal to or greater than this stress, whichever is the more severe requirement. – The fatigue S-N curve for C18150 copper-zirconium, with the maximum lamination Tresca stress
plotted at N = 60 K cycles, is shown above. The lamination stress is slightly below the 2x stress level and meets all the requirement of the Design Criteria.
2. Copper Flag Thread Stress: The average shear stress in the copper threads is 34.8 ksi. To satisfy the Design
Criteria, the shear stress must be less than 0.6 Sm = .4 Sy = 37.5 ksi.– The Modified Goodman diagram for C18150 copper-chromium-zirconium, with thread Tresca stress
plotted, is shown above. The thread stress meets all the requirements of the Design Criteria.
3. Contact Status/ Pressure: Results show that none of the joints separate, and that the minimum local contact
pressure is approximately 2600 psi, which is 1100 psi above the minimum requirement.– Initial assumptions are correct, sequential one-way coupled model is valid.
4. Lamination Buckling Load Multiplier Factor (LMF): The 1st mode LMF is 58 (see Appendix), well above the Design Criteria linear buckling
requirement of 5.
![Page 30: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30NSTXNSTX
Appendix A
30
Lamella Stress Linearization
![Page 31: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: Lamination Tresca Stress Current Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap
31
![Page 32: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: Lamination Stress SingularityCurrent Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap, Center Strap
32
.006”
![Page 33: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33NSTXNSTX
ANSYS Static Structural Results: Stress LinearizationCurrent Scenario #82, 30 Laminations/ Strap, Worst-Case Lamination
33
Peak
Bending
Membrane
Total
Bending + Membrane
![Page 34: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34NSTXNSTX
Appendix B
34
Lamella Buckling Analysis
![Page 35: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35NSTXNSTX
Single Lamination Linear Buckling Model Results
35
2nd ModeLoad Multiplier = 73.0
3rd ModeLoad Multiplier = 117.6
1st ModeLoad Multiplier = 58.4
![Page 36: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36NSTXNSTX
Appendix C
36
Flex Strap Dynamic Load Factor
![Page 37: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
tr ~ 6 ms
Centered Plasma Disruption: Effective Pulse Duration
![Page 39: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Modal Analysis Results: Flex Strap Mode 1 = 65 Hz
![Page 40: NSTXU-CALC-132-06-01 TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062719/56813025550346895d95abe4/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
1st Mode