NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

18
NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith

Transcript of NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

Page 1: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

NS4054“Oil and Politics in Southeast

Asia”Benjamin Smith

Page 2: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

Author

• Benjamin Smith

• PhD University of Washington 2002

• Associate Professor at the University of Florida, teaching comparative and Asian politics, ethnicity and nationalism, post-conflict peace-building

• Research focus: Separatist conflicts, regime change, democratization, and the politics of resource wealth

• Books and several publications

2

Page 3: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

Agenda

• Overview• “Old” Oil Exporters• Research Design and Findings• What to Expect to the New Exporters?• Conclusion

3

Page 4: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

Overview

• Research question

• How is the impact of oil income on politics in Southeast Asia?• Key arguments

• The effects of resource wealth are frequently conditional and therefore dependent on antecedent conditions

• Looks at three oil-shaped dynamics

• The trajectories of older exporters (Brunei, Malaysia, Indonesia)

• Broad regional trends since 1990

• The emergence of three new exporters (Cambodia, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam) since 2000

• Mono-causal approach vs Conditional approach

4

Page 5: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

“Old” Oil Exporters

• Brunei• Indonesia• Malaysia

5

Page 6: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

“Old” Oil Exporters

• Brunei

• Independent in 1960s

• Resembles the small Gulf monarchies

• Crude oil and natural gas share 60% of GDP and more than 90% exports

• Oil has small impact to the politics:• “Shellfare” by the regime• Civil-service majority

• Small impact politically and economically during Asian financial crisis

6

Page 7: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

“Old” Oil Exporters

• Indonesia

• 1960s-1970s : boom years in Indonesia’s oil industry

• Mid-1980s oil price crash: difficult period for the Indonesian government -> more autonomous economy

• Production decline -> left OPEC in 2008

• Results:• Oil-led to export-led manufacturing• Authoritarianism to democracy

7

Page 8: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

“Old” Oil Exporters

• Malaysia

• Oil dependent

• 1969 race riots -> assertive government response to the violent expression

• 1970s oil boom: a chance to restructure the economy

• Oil revenue was used to boost export competitiveness

8

Page 9: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

9

Research Design

• Purpose: to explore the general effects of oil export dependence in Southeast Asia

• Research approach: Quantitative analysis (regression analysis)

• Data used:

• 12 countries in Southeast Asia

• Period: 1990 – 2008 (except Timor-Leste, from 1999)• Using oil income per capita instead of GDP to measure oil

export dependence• Independent variables: Oil income per capita, GDP per

capita, annual GDP per capita growth• Outcome variables: Democracy, Conflict, Governance

Page 10: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

10

Hypotheses/ Common Trends

• Democracy

• More oil income = less democracy• Conflict

• Oil-rich countries are more prone to internal conflicts• Governance

• Oil exporting countries will score lower on the two governance indicators (Government effectiveness and Control of Corruption)

Page 11: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

11

Result

Main oil exporters

Page 12: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

12

Result

Page 13: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

13

Hyphoteses vs Result

Hypotheses Result

DEMOCRACY

More oil income = less democracy More oil income = less democracy

CONFLICT

Oil-rich countries are more prone to internal conflicts

Oil or per capita wealth does not have significant relations to the onset of violent internal conflicts

GOVERNANCE

Oil exporting countries = bad governance

Oil exporters have more capable government

Page 14: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

14

What to Expect to the New Exporters?

• Cambodia, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam• Influence of oil revenue to the political economies?

• Likely for Cambodia and Timor-Leste

• Unlikely for Vietnam

Page 15: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

15

What to Expect to the New Exporters?

• Cambodia

• Oil exploration began in 1969 but stopped when the Khmer Rouge came to power

• Offshore discoveries in 2005• 3-5 trillion cubic meters of natural gas• 400 million barrels of oil

• Problems• Democracy: Cambodian People’s Party has undermined political

freedom• Conflict: Oil income are likely to make renewed conflict more likely• Governance: The government is one of the least capable in

Southeast Asia

Page 16: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

16

What to Expect to the New Exporters?

• Timor-Leste

• High expectation following 1999 independence

• No progress in 10 years -> disputes with Australia

• 90% of population works in agricultural sector -> unlikely change, due to insufficient technological resources to refine oil

• Problems:• Oil revenue distorts country’s currency• The misuse of oil revenue by politicians• Oil might amplify the problems of poor governance and unresolved

sociopolitical cleavages

Page 17: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

17

What to Expect to the New Exporters?

• Vietnam

• Oil exploration began in the 1960s, production took place since 1986

• 2004 production reached 400,000 barrels per day from just 275,000 in 1999

• Modest oil effect to a stable authoritarian regime

Page 18: NS4054 “Oil and Politics in Southeast Asia” Benjamin Smith.

18

Conclusion

• No uniform effects of oil politics in Southeast Asia• Need to have coherent looks at the various trajectories to

understand the political economy of oil• Lesson learned

• Old oil exporters: oil wealth in Southeast Asia has been put to nearly as many political uses as we have yet theorized

• New oil exporters: oil sector influence can be potentially transformative or modest