H oward Franco, Jr., Esq. Michael L. Wroniak, Esq. Christie Bodnar Swiss, Esq.
November9th,2009 ByElectronicMailandFax ThomaseniaDuncan,Esq. GeneralCounsel
-
Upload
api-26512242 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of November9th,2009 ByElectronicMailandFax ThomaseniaDuncan,Esq. GeneralCounsel
-
8/14/2019 November9th,2009 ByElectronicMailandFax ThomaseniaDuncan,Esq. GeneralCounsel
1/3
November9th,2009
ByElectronicMailandFax
ThomaseniaDuncan,Esq.GeneralCounsel
FederalElectionCommission
999EStreet,NW
Washington,DC20463
RE:CommentsonAdvisoryOpinionRequestAOR2009-27
DearMs.Duncan,
ThesecommentsarefiledonbehalfofShaunDakin,CEOofCitizensforCivil
DiscourseandtheNationalPoliticalDoNotContactRegistryandSteveCarter,formerAttorneyGeneralofIndianaandFormerPresidentoftheNationalAssociationofAttorneysGeneralinregardtoAOR200927anadvisoryopinion
requestsubmittedonbehalfoftheAmericaFutureFundPoliticalAction(AFFPA),requestingtheCommissionsguidanceonthequestionofwhethertheseadditional
staterestrictionsonprerecordedtelephonecallsarepreemptedbyFECA.AFFPA
statesthatitwouldlikeanswerstothesequestions:
Specifically:
1. Arestatelawspurportingtoprohibitallpre-recordedtelephonecallsbyfederalpoliticalcommitteespreemptedbyFECA?
2. Arestatelawsrequiringpriorconsent,specificallythroughtheuseofaliveoperator,priortodeliveryofapre-recordedtelephonecallpreemptedbythe
FederalElectionCampaignAct,asamended?
3. Arestatelawspurportingtoprohibitfederalpoliticalcommitteesfromengaginginfundraisingviapre-recordedtelephonecallspreemptedbyFECA?
4. Arestatelawspurportingtorequirefederalpoliticalcommitteestoincludeadditionaldisclaimersonpre-recordedtelephonecallspreemptedbyFECA?
Discussion
SteveCarter,AttorneyinIndiana,istheonlyAttorneyGeneraltohavebroughtsuitoverpoliticalrobocalls.ShaunDakinistheCEOofCitizensforCivilDiscourse,a
membershiporganizationrepresentingtheAmericanvoterandover100,000
membersthatadvocatesforadditionalregulationonpoliticalrobocalls.Mr.Carter
testifiedintheUSHouseinDecember2007athearingsheldbyRep.Lofgren(DCA)
intheHouseAdministrationSubcommitteeonElections.Mr.Dakintestifiedinthe
USSenateinFebruary2008athearingsheldbySen.Feinstein(DCA)intheUnited
StatesSenateCommitteeonRulesandAdministration.
-
8/14/2019 November9th,2009 ByElectronicMailandFax ThomaseniaDuncan,Esq. GeneralCounsel
2/3
Webelievethatanopinionofthekindbeingsoughtwouldhaveanextremely
negativeimpactonvotersandwoulddiminishtheabilityofstateenforcersand
legislatorstoprovidetherelieftheirconstituentsdesire:theprotectionofvoterprivacyfromunwantedpoliticalprerecordedtelephonecalls.
Specifically,Indianahasworkedhardovertheyears,includingatleast10personal
meetingsMr.CarterhadwithFCCcommissionersfrom2005to2008topreventpre
emptionofstatetelephoneprivacylaws.
NowPoliticalActionCommittees,specificallyAmericaFutureFundPoliticalAction
(AFFPA),wouldliketoshifttoaplayingfieldwheretheybelievetheFECmaybe
moreinclinedtoknockdownstateenforcement.
Wedonotbelievestateregulationsonpre-recordedtelephonecallscanbe
viewedascampaignfinanceregulationsandtherebyshouldnotberegulated
byFECA.Instead,webelievethatstatelaws(specificallyIndianalaw)addresssomethingelse,
theuseofaspecifictechnology,automateddialers,whichinvadetheprivacyofvoters.Itisimportanttonotethattheselawsregulateprerecordedcallsacrossthe
board,anddonotspecificallyregulatepoliticalcalls.Asaresult,politiciansare
treatednobetterandnoworsethanallotherentities,commercialorotherwise.
InIndianaMr.Carterwouldnothavebeenabletopursuetheinitialprerecorded
telephonecallenforcementinthe2006HillSodrelraceifsuchapreemptionhad
beeninplace(See,StateofIndianav.AmericanFamilyVoices,Inc.etal1.Alsosee,
StateofIndianav.EconomicFreedomFund,etal.)
Asthestatuescitedintherequestfiledinthismattershow,theIndianalanguage
doesnotsingleoutpoliticalcallsforregulation,anddonotcreateanexemptionastheindustryhasbeenabletoextractfromCongress.
Itisincorrecttobelievethatstatesarenotabletoregulate"instrumentalities"that
becomeobjectsofuseduringapoliticaloradvocacycampaign.Forexample,state
trafficlawsaffectcampaignersgoingtoandfromeventsandgunsafetylawsarestillappliedtocampaignersatgunrallies.
Asaresult,justbecausearegulationimpactsthoseinthepoliticalcontextdoesnotmeanthestateistryingtoregulatethepoliticaldiscourse.Rather,issueslike
privacy,saferoads,andsafetyfromviolentharmarelegitimateinterestsoftheir
ownthatlegislatorsatthestatelevelmustabletoprotect.
1http://indianalawblog.com/archives/2008/06/ind_courts_indi_30.html
-
8/14/2019 November9th,2009 ByElectronicMailandFax ThomaseniaDuncan,Esq. GeneralCounsel
3/3
WeurgetheCommissiontoadviseAFFPAthatFECAdoesnotpreemptadditional
staterestrictionsonprerecordedtelephonecalls.
Weappreciatetheopportunitytosubmitthesecomments.
Sincerely,/s/ShaunDakin
ShaunDakin
CitizensForCivilDiscourse
/s/SteveCarter
SteveCarterAttorneyandBusinessConsultant
AttorneyGeneralofIndiana(ret),FormerPresidentoftheNationalAssociationofAttorneysGeneralstevecarter219@yahoo.com
3179977987
ShaunDakin
CEOandFounder
CitizensforCivilDiscourse
TheNationalPoliticalDoNotContactRegistry
2019QStreet
Washington,DC20009
Copyto:CommissionSecretary