November 2012. Clarity Consistency Constancy Communication.

11
STE Program Update Improvement Planning and Initiatives November 2012

Transcript of November 2012. Clarity Consistency Constancy Communication.

Page 1: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

STE Program UpdateImprovement Planning and Initiatives

November 2012

Page 2: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

Clarity Consistency Constancy Communication

The Four C’s of STE

Page 3: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

ELEMENTARY, K-5 MIDDLE, 6-8 HIGH, 9-12

Curriculum Mapping Curriculum Mapping Curriculum Mapping

Textbook Correlations Textbook Correlations Program of Studies

Report Card Benchmarks

Curriculum Topic Study

CLARITY

Page 4: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

MA DESE Strand Map Example

Page 5: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

ELEMENTARY, K-5 MIDDLE, 6-8 HIGH, 9-12

Learning Priorities Learning Priorities Learning Priorities (core)

Science Celebrations Common Syllabi Common Syllabi

Common Assessments

Common Assessments

Common Mid-year Exams/Final Exams

Claims, Evidence, and Reasoning

Data Analysis Protocol Student Choice in Assessment

CONSISTENCY

Page 6: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

Learning Priorities Example

MA LS 14MA LS 1

Grade 6 Life Science Strand

MA LS 6

MA LS 13

MA LS 15MA LS 5

Page 7: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

Data Analysis Protocol Example

QuestionAre our students more successful when a visual is provided with the question?

Observation(s)Specifically with regard to students with special needs, the average percent correct on questions with visuals is 6% lower than those without visuals over a six-year period. Regular education students present a similar trend, but the percentage correct is considerably lower (2%).

Inference(s)We are not giving our students ample opportunity to analyze and interpret visuals.

Extension(s)We must provide additional practice with visuals (i.e., assessments, informational text).

Page 8: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

ELEMENTARY, K-5 MIDDLE, 6-8 HIGH, 9-12

Interactive Notebooks Student Choice in Assessment

Student Choice in Assessment

Formative Assessment Probes

Formative Assessment Probes

Objectives and Assessment

Science Fair

CONSTANCY

Page 9: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

Source: Science and Children. Washington, D.C: National Science Teachers Association, 2012. Online.

Formative Assessment Probe Examples

Page 10: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

ELEMENTARY, K-5 MIDDLE, 6-8 HIGH, 9-12

For Your Information Newsletter (monthly)

For Your Information Newsletter (monthly)

For Your Information Newsletter (monthly)

Workshop-related (grade-level) Meetings

Aspen STE Page Aspen STE Page

Department Heads

COMMUNICATION

Page 11: November 2012.  Clarity  Consistency  Constancy  Communication.

“I have found that our recent department meetings have had more of an impact on my teaching than any from the past. I am taking away simple, usable ideas that affect my teaching every day.”

-Dave Yaeger, PSHS Physics Teacher

Department Heads