Novel Approaches in Fighting Sudden Death Syndrome in ......Acknowledgements Bhattacharyya Lab...

37
Madan K. Bhattacharyya Agronomy Department Iowa State University Novel Approaches in Fighting Sudden Death Syndrome in Soybean

Transcript of Novel Approaches in Fighting Sudden Death Syndrome in ......Acknowledgements Bhattacharyya Lab...

  • Madan K. BhattacharyyaAgronomy Department

    Iowa State University

    Novel Approaches inFighting Sudden

    Death Syndrome inSoybean

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Dr

    Why to enhance sudden death syndrome(SDS) resistance in soybean?

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Dr

    Why to enhance sudden death syndrome(SDS) resistance in soybean?

    v The estimated soybean yield suppression fromSDS in 2010 was 2.1% of total yield, which wasvalued at $0.82 billion.

    v Growing SDS resistant cultivars is the majormethod of controlling this disease.

    v Unfortunately, SDS resistance encoded by a largenumber QTL; and breeding SDS resistance ischallenging.

    v We need novel single-genes encoding SDSresistance.

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • Two Novel Approaches to EnhanceSDS Resistance in Soybean

    1) Understand how the pathogen causesSDS and apply the knowledge to createSDS resistant soybean lines.

    2) Identify and express plant genes toenhance SDS resistance.

    3/16/16 4

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Lead PI: Madan K. Bhattacharyya (ISU)Co-Pis: Liang Dong (ISU)

    Jing Yong Ye (UTSA)

    SDS symptoms – (i) root necrosis and (ii) foliar SDS

    Small chlorotic spotson leaves

    Dead interveinal tissue falls off

    Leaf drop –followed by flower and pod drop

    Young seedlings Mature plants

    Pathogen remains in infected roots.

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • 3/16/16 6

    v In North America, Fusarium virguliforme causes SDS.v In South America, F. tucumaniae is the major causal

    agent of SDS.v Both are haploid organisms.v They produce sickle-shaped conidia for spread of the

    disease.v They overwinter as chlamydospores.

    v

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Express plant genes

    Microfluidic Assays

    Dong Lab, Iowa State University

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • 3/16/16 8

    How quickly conidium germinate?

  • 3/16/16 9

    Conidia development

  • 3/16/16 10

    Structure of the MAT locus

    Hughes et al. 2013: Mycologia 106:686–697.

  • 3/16/16 11

    Frequency distributions of alleles at the Mat locusamong the Fusarium spp.

    Hughes et al. 2013: Mycologia 106:686–697.

  • A maximum-likelihood tree of Fusarium species (based on genome-wide SNP data)

    BRR

    BRR (bean root rot)

    SDS

    SDS

    SDS

    SDS

    BRR

    Huang et al. 2016: PloS One, Under Revision Huang et al. 2016: PloS One, Under Revision

    BRR

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Phylogenetic tree of F. virguliforme isolates.

    13

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Phylogenetic tree of F. tucumaniae isolates.

    14

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • Two Approaches to EnhanceSDS Resistance in Soybean

    1) Understand how the pathogen causesSDS and apply the knowledge to createSDS resistance.

    2) Express plant genes to enhance SDSresistance.

    3/16/16 15

  • FvTox1 – acidic proteincauses foliar SDS

    3/16/16 16Brar et al. (2011) MPMI 24: 1179-1188

    Pudake et al. (2013) Current Genetics, 59:107-117

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Lead PI: Madan K. Bhattacharyya (ISU)Co-PIs: Liang Dong (ISU)

    Jing Yong Ye (UTSA)

    Brar and Bhattacharyya 2012: MPMI 25:817–824

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Dr

    Work flow for identifying peptides fromphage display peptides libraries

    3/16/16 18Wang et al. (2015) PLoS OneDOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0145156

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Dr

    Four classes of M13 phage clonesdisplayed FvTox1-interacting peptides.

    3/16/16 19

    Class (sequence) Clone Number Peptide Library

    Class I (SYLPETIYEYRL)

    1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,23,28,29,30,36,38,39

    Ph.D.-12

    Class Ⅱ (VENKTRYHDREV)

    3,9,22,25,27,37 Ph.D.-12

    Class Ⅲ (HEGAWHNYARSV)

    24 Ph.D.-12

    ClassⅣ (SNGRVAD)

    31 Ph.D.-7

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Dr

    Nine synthetic genes encodingFvTox1-interacting peptides

    20

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • Dr

    21

    Transgenic soybean lines carrying FvTox1-interactingPep -1 showed enhanced foliar SDS resistance.

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    FvTox1-interacting peptides conferenhanced tolerance of roots to FvTox1.

    A

    B D

    CR² = 0.51712

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Roo

    t Rot

    Sev

    erity

    (%)

    Foliar SDS Score

    R² = 0.83681

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Stem

    Rot

    Sev

    erity

    (%)

    Foliar SDS Score

    R²#=#0.83919#

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Deve

    lopm

    ent o

    f New

    Ro

    ot (

    %)

    Foliar SDS Score

    A

    C

    B

    22Williams 82 Williams 82 + Pep 1

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • Dr

    23

    0 0.5

    1 1.5

    2 2.5

    3 3.5

    4

    MN1

    606

    Pep

    9C -

    7

    Pep

    8C -

    9

    Pep

    1C -

    12

    Pep

    5C -

    14

    Pep

    2C -

    8

    Pep

    5C -

    4

    Pep

    1 - 6

    Pep

    9 -

    25

    Pep

    9C -

    2

    Pep

    1 -

    7

    Pep

    2C

    - 14

    Pep

    8 -

    14

    Pep

    8C

    - 7

    Pep

    2C

    - 6

    Pep

    5 -

    15

    Pep

    1C

    - 6

    Pep

    9 -

    3

    Spen

    cer

    Will

    iam

    s 82

    Pep

    8 -

    17

    Folia

    r SDS

    Sco

    re

    0 0.5

    1 1.5

    2 2.5

    3 3.5

    4 4.5

    5

    Folia

    r SDS

    Sco

    re

    Resistant Susceptible

    02468

    1 01 21 4

    Num

    ber o

    f Pla

    nts

    R e s i s t an tS us c e p t ib l e

    B

    A

    Transgenic soybean lines showed enhancedresistance to F. virguliforme infection.

    B. Wang and M.K. Bhattacharyya, unpublished

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Express plant genes

    Summary

    1. Demonstrated that FvTox1-interacting Pep-1enhances foliar SDS resistance.

    2. FvTox1-interacting peptides conferringenhanced foliar SDS resistance also showedimproved tolerance of roots to FvTox1.

    3. FvTox1 most likely causes suppression of rootgrowth and root necrosis in addition to foliarSDS.

    24

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • Two Approaches to EnhanceSDS Resistance in Soybean

    1) Understand how the pathogen causesSDS and apply the knowledge to createSDS resistance.

    2) Identify and express plant genes toenhance SDS resistance.

    1. Arabidopsis nonhost resistance genes2. Altered expression of soybean genes

    3/16/16 25

  • Phytophthora sojae susceptible (pss) mutants

    pen1-1 pss1

  • Mutant Family Mutant Family Mutant Family

    pss1 0.2B17I9 pss11 0.25B8C1 pss21 0.25B9D7

    pss2 0.2B3D2 pss12 0.25 B9A1 pss22 0.25B9F1

    pss3 0.3B6A7 pss13 0.25B8H5 pss23 0.2B20I2

    pss4 0.2B21F1 pss14 0.3B6E8 pss24 0.2B9G4

    pss5 0.2B15I6 pss15 0.3B6H8 pss25 0.2B8B7

    pss6 0.2B4G5 pss16 0.25B7F8 pss26 0.3B1C7

    pss7 0.2B21B9 pss17 0.25B7G4 pss27 0.3B8B8

    pss8 0.2B4A5 pss18 0.25B9C3 pss28 0.25B9E3

    pss9 0.2B21D6 pss19 0.3B6E4 pss29 0.2B1A9

    pss10 0.25B7I5 pss20 0.3B6C8 pss30 0.25B7D2

    Identified 30 pss mutants.

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Dr

    Fourteen pss mutants are alsosusceptible to F. virguliforme.

    pss12

    pss15

    pss16

    pss1

    pss2

    pss5

    pss3

    pss10

    pss18

    pss19

    pss20

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • Dr

    Field evaluation of transgenic soybean plantscarrying Arabidopsis nonhost resistance Pss1 gene

    0 20 40 60 80

    100

    SDS

    Res

    ista

    nt P

    lant

    s (%

    )

    30-Sep 15-Oct

    29B. Wang et al. unpublished

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Dr

    30

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    SDS

    Resi

    stan

    t Pla

    nts

    (%)

    Field evaluation of transgenic soybean plantscarrying Arabidopsis nonhost resistance

    Pss30 gene193-16.2 35S-Pss30-16.2 232-2 Prom2-Pss30-2

    232-5 Prom2-Pss30-5 Williams 82

    A

    C

    B

    D

    193-16.2 35S-Pss30-16.2 232-2 Prom2-Pss30-2

    232-5 Prom2-Pss30-5 Williams 82

    A

    C

    B

    D

    S. Kambakam et al., unpublished

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • Two Approaches to EnhanceSDS Resistance in Soybean

    1) Understand how the pathogen causesSDS and apply the knowledge to createSDS resistance.

    2) Identify and express plant genes toenhance SDS resistance.

    1. Arabidopsis nonhost resistance genes2. Altered expression of soybean genes

    3/16/16 31

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Soybean genes suppressed duringF. virguliforme infection.

    32

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    Expression of GmSAMT1 enhances SDS resistancein transgenic soybean plants under field conditions

    33

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

    34

    Expression of GmDS1 enhances SDS resistance intransgenic soybean plants under field conditions

    http://soysdsresistance.ag.iastate.edu/index.html

  • Current Status

    Gene Name Growth Chamber Field EvaluationPss1 Resistant ResistantPss30 Resistant ResistantPss6 Resistant Not YetPss21 Resistant Not YetPss25 Partially Resistant Not YetGmSAMT1 Resistant ResistantGmDS1 Resistant ResistantGmARP1 Resistant ResistantGmSEQ1 Resistant Not Yet

    3/16/16 35

  • Acknowledgements

    Bhattacharyya Lab

    Sekhar Kambakam, Ph.D.

    Micheline Ngaki, Ph.D.

    Bing Wang, Ph.D.

    Siva Swaminathan, Ph.D.

    Jill Heinrich

    Previous Scientists

    Hargeet Brar

    Ramesh Pudake, Ph.D.

    Devinder Sandhu, Ph.D.

    Min Xu, Ph.D.

    Binod Sahu, Ph.D.

    Rishi Sumit, M.S.

    Prashant Singh, Ph.D.

    Program Grant no. 2013-68004-20374 11:25:52 AM 36

    Dong LabXuan Qiao

    Huang LabAnindya Das

    Ye Lab (UT San Antonio)Bailin Zhang, Ph.D.

    Teresa J. HughesKerry O’Donnell

    USDA-ARS

    ISU Plant Transformation FacilityIowa Soybean Association

    CPBRUnited Soybean Board

  • 3/16/16 37

    Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3Two Novel Approaches to Enhance SDS Resistance in SoybeanSlide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Two Approaches to Enhance SDS Resistance in SoybeanFvTox1 – acidic protein causes foliar SDSSlide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21Slide 22Slide 23Slide 24Two Approaches to Enhance SDS Resistance in SoybeanSlide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29Slide 30Two Approaches to Enhance SDS Resistance in SoybeanSlide 32Slide 33Slide 34Current StatusAcknowledgementsSlide 37