Registered Mail # RR 123 000 005 US

THIS IS A PRIVATE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE PARTIESNOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL --- NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

March 19, 2010

Principal:John Henry Doec/o 1234 Creditor StreetHuntington Beach, CaliforniaNon-Domestic without the US

Respondents:GREGORY J. FAUKERc/o U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEPOST OFFICE BOX 7238BEN FRANKLIN STATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20044

STANLEY L. JONESc/o GREGORY J. FAUKERU.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEPOST OFFICE BOX 7238BEN FRANKLIN STATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20044

UNITED STATES OF AMERICAc/o GREGORY J. FAUKERU.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEPOST OFFICE BOX 7238BEN FRANKLIN STATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20044

DAVID HENRY JONESc/o GREGORY J. FAUKERU.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEPOST OFFICE BOX 7238BEN FRANKLIN STATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20044

Re: COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF, CASE/ACCOUNT # 2:10-cv-00000-JJJ-XX.

Dear GENTLEMEN:

I am in receipt of your three (3) presentments, Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Relief, hereinafter “COMPLAINT”, dated March 15, 2010, the originals, with original banker’s acceptance indorsements, are enclosed herewith. As the Secured Party Creditor, and the holder of the paramount security interest in any and all real and personal property and the proceeds therefrom, registered to, associated with, in the possession of, or under the management of, PETER F. DOE, JOHN H. DOE, and GEORGE K. DOE, your alleged claims and/or requests prejudice my rights, titles, and interests in regards to said property as the Executive Trustee for the private trust to which said rights, titles, and interests have been pledged. In order for me to provide you with a remedy a bona fide and verified claim must be presented. Therefore, I am conditionally accepting your offer for injunctive and other relief, upon proof of claim that:

(1) PETER F. DOE, JOHN H. DOE, and/or GEORGE K. DOE have engaged in any of the conduct you have alleged in the COMPLAINT; and

(2) PETER F. DOE, JOHN H. DOE, and/or GEORGE K. DOE have caused any harm, loss or injury, as you have alleged in the COMPLAINT; and

(3) there is a defect in the instrument tendered and enclosed herewith, Private Bonded Promissory Note # JD0000101, hereinafter “INSTRUMENT”.

CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE Page 1 of 2

(4) the INSTRUMENT is not sufficient to setoff, settle, and discharge any and all outstanding obligations, duties, and/or liabilities alleged and attributed to PETER F. DOE, JOHN H. DOE, and/or GEORGE K. DOE.

You have ten (10) days from receipt of this Constructive Notice of Conditional Acceptance and the enclosed Affidavit of Specific Negative Averment, hereinafter “AFFIDAVIT”, to respond on a point-by-point basis, via sworn affidavit, under your full commercial liability, signing under penalty of perjury that the facts contained therein are true, correct, complete and not misleading. Mere declarations are an insufficient response. If an extension of time is needed to properly answer, please request it in writing. Failure to respond will be deemed agreement with the facts stated in the enclosed AFFIDAVIT and an inability to prove your claim.

The INSTRUMENT is being tendered in good faith, for the setoff and/or discharge of any and all alleged obligations, duties, or liabilities attributed to PETER F. DOE, JOHN H. DOE, and/or GEORGE K. DOE, thereby protecting and preserving all my rights, titles, interests, and remedies regarding any and all property, registered to, associated with, in the possession of, or under the management of PETER F. DOE, JOHN H. DOE, and/or GEORGE K. DOE. Take notice of the Pre-Offset Notice For Balanced Book Adjustment, enclosed herewith, it may contain significant information regarding your duties as the holder in due course and your obligation to exercise ordinary care with regards to the INSTRUMENT.

Executed in Orange county, California Republic, this Nineteenth day of the Third month in the year of our Lord, two-thousand and ten. Witness my hand and seal.

___________________________________________________________John Henry Doe, Secured Party Creditor, Executive Trustee for the private trust known as John Henry Doe & Company

Please direct responses to third party witness:Cindy Smith, Notary Public1234 Witness StreetHuntington Beach, California 92648

Enclosure(s):(1) Affidavit of Specific Negative Averment dated March 19, 2010 (4 pages);(2) Pre-Offset Notice For Balanced Book Adjustment (1 page);(3) Private Registered Bonded Promissory Note # US22074404 (1 page);(4) Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Relief dated March 15, 2010 (21 pages);(5) Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Relief dated March 15, 2010 (21 pages);(6) Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Relief dated March 15, 2010 (21 pages);(7) I.R.S. Form 1040-V (1 page); and(8) Notary’s Certificate of Service dated March 19, 2010 (1 page)

CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE Page 2 of 2

NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO THREATEN, HARASS, HINDER OR OBSTRUCT ANY LAWFUL OPERATIONS. IT IS FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING LAWFUL REMEDY AS IS PROVIDED BY LAW.

TO: GREGORY J. FAUKERc/o U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEPOST OFFICE BOX 7238BEN FRANKLIN STATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20044

FROM: John Henry Doe – Principal, UCC File #/State: 10-1000000001/CALIFORNIASecured Party Creditor FOR: PETER F. DOE, JOHN H. DOE,c/o 1234 Creditor Street and GEORGE K. DOE, DEBTOR(S)Huntington Beach, California; near [92648] RE: Private Prepaid Treasury Account # 123456789Non-Domestic without the US Social Security Number – 123-45-6789

DATE: March 19, 2010

PRE-OFFSET NOTICE FOR BALANCED BOOK ADJUSTMENTDear GENTLEMEN:

The enclosed Statute Staple Securities Instruments are tendered to you for the purpose of balanced book adjustment as legal tender to lower and reduce the UNITED STATES national debt. The Undersigned understands the complexity of following this procedure. The “Code” is effectively in place to save and protect the monetary system of this country. If and when non-accreditation occurs, the economy and monetary system of the country will certainly collapse. That is the complexity and importance of honoring this procedure.

U.S.C. TITLE 12, CHAPTER 2 – NATIONAL BANKS authorizes the procedure. If you don’t understand this procedure, please research the US Code for clarity or seek competent legal counsel. You should understand that in Title 12 U.S.C. § 371b-2(c), the Code defines “Exposure” to include all extensions of credit regardless of name and description. This procedure is intended for all of the people of the united States of America. Non-accreditation will result in a serious error and injury against the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and the Principal Secured Party Creditor. This will cause a miscalculation upon the FEDERAL RESERVE Accountant Balanced Book and will require a filing of the proper IRS forms for collection of these funds. This adjustment may be completed by TIMOTHY F GEITHNER, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, who is my duly appointed fiduciary agent.

As you are well aware, lawful money no longer exists in our economic system. This was replaced by FEDERAL RESERVE “Notes” which are, in effect, promissory notes. This procedure to allow offset of debt is the proper legal remedy that has been provided for us to discharge debt, since the money was removed by the U. S. Corporate Government. This is a debt obligation of the UNITED STATES. Please use this procedure to offset any bills that I present by balanced book adjustment, settlement in full, discharge of all presentments, and return all interest to the Principal. TIMOTHY F GEITHNER, or my designated Fiduciary Agent, is authorized to adjust, from this account, along with any reasonable and lawful interest, penalties, and extra fees, as needed, in order to satisfy this procedure. This may be ledgered against the Account Number indicated as best suits the needs of the US TREASURY.

Sincerely,

____________________________________________________________________________ John Henry Doe, Principal and Secured Party Creditorfor PETER F. DOE, JOHN H. DOE, and GEORGE K. DOE, DEBTOR(S)

PRE-OFFSET NOTICE FOR BALANCED BOOK ADJUSTMENT Page 1 of 1

AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT

The undersigned Affiant, John Henry Doe, hereinafter “Affiant”, does solemnly affirm, declare and state as follows:

1. Affiant is competent to state the matters set forth herein.

2. Affiant has knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3. All the facts herein are true, correct and complete, admissible as evidence and if called upon as a witness, Affiant will testify to their veracity.

Plain Statement of Facts

4. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE has prepared and filed, with the IRS, false and frivolous federal income tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, or other fraudulent tax-related documents, on behalf of other persons, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

5. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE has prepared and filed, with the IRS, false and frivolous federal income tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, or other fraudulent tax-related documents, on behalf of other persons, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

6. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE has prepared and filed, with the IRS, false and frivolous federal income tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, or other fraudulent tax-related documents, on behalf of other persons, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

7. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE has engaged in fraudulent or deceptive conduct which substantially interferes with the proper administration of the Internal Revenue Laws, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

8. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE has engaged in fraudulent or deceptive conduct which substantially interferes with the proper administration of the Internal Revenue Laws, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

9. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE has engaged in fraudulent or deceptive conduct which substantially interferes with the proper administration of the Internal Revenue Laws, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

10. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE has prepared and filed federal tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, that understate any persons’ tax liabilities as a result of unreasonable and frivolous claims and, thus, has engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6694, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

11. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE has prepared and filed federal tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, that understate any persons’ tax liabilities as a result of unreasonable and frivolous claims and, thus, has engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6694, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

12. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE has prepared and filed federal tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, that understate any persons’ tax liabilities as a result of unreasonable and frivolous claims and, thus, has engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6694, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

13. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE has prepared and filed federal tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, that understate any persons’ tax liabilities as a result of willful attempts to understate said tax liabilities, and/or reckless and/or intentional disregard of internal revenue laws and regulations and, thus, have engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6694, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

14. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE has prepared and filed federal tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, that understate any persons’ tax liabilities as a result of willful attempts to understate said tax liabilities, and/or reckless and/or intentional disregard of internal revenue laws and regulations and, thus, have engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6694, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

15. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE has prepared and filed federal tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, that understate any persons’ tax liabilities as a result of willful attempts to understate said tax liabilities, and/or reckless

AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT Page 1 of 4

and/or intentional disregard of internal revenue laws and regulations and, thus, have engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6694, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

16. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE has prepared federal tax returns that include fraudulent refund claims, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

17. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE has prepared federal tax returns that include fraudulent refund claims, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

18. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE has prepared federal tax returns that include fraudulent refund claims, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

19. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE, directly or indirectly, organized, promoted, marketed and/or participated in the sale of a plan or arrangement and, in doing so, made false and fraudulent statements with respect to the tax benefits of participating in the plan or arrangement, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

20. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE, directly or indirectly, organized, promoted, marketed and/or participated in the sale of a plan or arrangement and, in doing so, made false and fraudulent statements with respect to the tax benefits of participating in the plan or arrangement, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

21. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE, directly or indirectly, organized, promoted, marketed and/or participated in the sale of a plan or arrangement and, in doing so, made false and fraudulent statements with respect to the tax benefits of participating in the plan or arrangement, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

22. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE falsely promised larger tax refunds from the Government predicated on the submission of fraudulent documents to the Internal Revenue Service, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

23. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE falsely promised larger tax refunds from the Government predicated on the submission of fraudulent documents to the Internal Revenue Service, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

24. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE falsely promised larger tax refunds from the Government predicated on the submission of fraudulent documents to the Internal Revenue Service, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

25. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6694 and/or 26 U.S.C. §6695, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

26. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6694 and/or 26 U.S.C. §6695, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

27. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6694 and/or 26 U.S.C. §6695, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

28. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6700, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

29. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6700, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

30. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6700, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

31. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE prepared and aided or assisted in the preparation and/or filing of federal income tax returns and other documents that resulted in the understatement of the liability for tax of another person, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT Page 2 of 4

32. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE prepared and aided or assisted in the preparation and/or filing of federal income tax returns and other documents that resulted in the understatement of the liability for tax of another person, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

33. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE prepared and aided or assisted in the preparation and/or filing of federal income tax returns and other documents that resulted in the understatement of the liability for tax of another person, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

34. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6701, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

35. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6701, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

36. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE engaged in conduct subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. §6701, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

37. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE prepared and/or filed any fraudulent documents and/or federal income tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, and/or information returns, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

38. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE prepared and/or filed any fraudulent documents and/or federal income tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, and/or information returns, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

39. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE prepared and/or filed any fraudulent documents and/or federal income tax returns, and/or amended tax returns, and/or information returns, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

40. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE has substantially interfered with the enforcement of the internal revenue laws, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

41. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE has substantially interfered with the enforcement of the internal revenue laws, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

42. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE has substantially interfered with the enforcement of the internal revenue laws, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

43. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE has promoted or engaged in any tax-fraud scheme, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

44. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE has promoted or engaged in any tax-fraud scheme, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

45. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE has promoted or engaged in any tax-fraud scheme, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

46. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE has engaged in conduct causing harm, loss, or injury to the United States and/or the public, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

47. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE has engaged in conduct causing harm, loss, or injury to the United States and/or the public, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

48. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE has engaged in conduct causing harm, loss, or injury to the United States and/or the public, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

49. There is no evidence that PETER F. DOE has engaged in, promoted, assisted, aided, and/or prepared any fraudulent, frivolous, or fabricated federal tax returns, amended federal tax returns, and/or information returns, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

50. There is no evidence that JOHN H. DOE has engaged in, promoted, assisted, aided, and/or prepared any fraudulent, frivolous, or fabricated federal tax returns, amended federal tax returns, and/or information returns, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT Page 3 of 4

51. There is no evidence that GEORGE K. DOE has engaged in, promoted, assisted, aided, and/or prepared any fraudulent, frivolous, or fabricated federal tax returns, amended federal tax returns, and/or information returns, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

52. There is no evidence of a defect in the instrument tendered and enclosed herewith, Private Bonded Promissory Note # JD0000101, hereinafter “INSTRUMENT”, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

53. There is no evidence that the INSTRUMENT is not sufficient to setoff, settle, and discharge any and all alleged outstanding obligations, duties, and/or liabilities for PETER F. DOE, JOHN H. DOE, and/or GEORGE K. DOE, and the Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.

AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT Page 4 of 4NOTICE

THIS CONTRACT AND ATTACHMENTS ARE NOT INTENDED TO HARASS, INTIMIDATE, OFFEND, CONSPIRE, BLACKMAIL, COERCE, CAUSE ANXIETY, ALARM OR DISTRESS, OR IMPEDE PUBLIC PROCEDURES. THEY ARE PRESENTED WITH HONORABLE AND PEACEFUL INTENTIONS TO FACILITATE SETTLEMENT AND CLOSURE OF THIS ACCOUNT. ANY AFFIRMATION CONTRARY TO THIS VERIFIED STATEMENT OF FACTS WILL COMPRISE YOUR STIPULATION TO COMMITTING A FRAUD.

California Republic )) sworn and subscribed:

Orange county )

I, John Henry Doe, Secured Party Creditor, under my unlimited liability and Commercial Oath, proceeding in good faith, being of sound mind, having first-hand knowledge, affirm, state, and declare that the facts contained herein are true, correct, complete and not misleading, under penalty of International Commercial Law, so help me, God.

________________________________________________________________(seal)

Commercial Affidavit Oath and Verification

John Henry Doe, Secured Party CreditorALL RIGHTS RESERVED

State of California )) ss:

County of Orange )

Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this ______ day of ______________, _____, by ____________________________,

proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me.

______________________________________________(seal) Signature

19th March 2010 John Henry Doe

JURAT

Cindy Smith, Notary Public1234 Witness StreetHuntington Beach, California 92648My commission expires: August 24, 2010

NOTARY’S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

It is hereby certified, that on the date noted below, the undersigned Notary Public mailed to:

GREGORY J. FAUKERc/o U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

POST OFFICE BOX 7238BEN FRANKLIN STATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20044

hereinafter, “Recipient,” the documents and sundry papers pertaining to the Recipient, regarding ______________________________________ as follows:

1. CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE, issued by John Henry Doe and dated March 19, 2010 (2 pages);

2. AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT, issued by John Henry Doe and dated March 19, 2010 (4 pages);

3. PRE-OFFSET NOTICE FOR BALANCED BOOK ADJUSTMENT, issued by John Henry Doe and dated March 19, 2010 (1 page);

4. PRIVATE BONDED PROMISSORY NOTE # JD0000101, issued by John Henry Doe and dated March 17, 2010 (1 page);

5. COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF, dated March 15, 2010 (21 pages);

6. COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF, dated March 15, 2010 (21 pages);

7. COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF, dated March 15, 2010 (21 pages);

8. I.R.S. Form 1040-V (1 page); and

9. reference copy of this Notary’s Certificate of Service (1 page) (signed original on file),

a total of _____________________ pages,

by Registered Mail No. ________________________________ Return Receipt attached by placing same in a postpaid envelope properly addressed to Recipient at the said address and depositing same at an official depository under the exclusive face and custody of the U.S. Postal Service within the State of California.

__________________________________________ _____________________ (Seal)NOTARY PUBLIC DATE

My commission expires: _____________________________ (Stamp)

Cindy Smith, Notary Public1234 Witness StreetHuntington Beach, California 92648

March 19, 2010

CASE/ACCOUNT # 2:10-cv-00000-JJJ-XX

RR 123 000 005 US

August 24, 2010

LEGAL NOTICE The Certifying Notary is an independent contractor and not a party to this claim. In fact the Certifying Notary is a Federal Witness Pursuant to TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 73, SEC. 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. The Certifying Notary also performs the functions of a quasi-Postal Inspector under the Homeland Security Act by being compelled to report any violations of the U.S. Postal regulations as an Officer of the Executive Department. Intimidating a Notary Public under Color of Law is a violation of Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 242, titled “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law,” which primarily governs police misconduct investigations. This Statute makes it a crime for any person acting under the Color of Law to willfully deprive any individual residing in the United States and/or United States of America those rights protected by the Constitution and U.S. laws.

Seventy-three (73)