2017-2018 AMVETS National Constitution · v t u [ æ v t u \ ¬ u á v t u [ . u ã u
Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.
-
Upload
elena-langdon -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.
![Page 1: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Notation for Arguments
Vertical Notation:S>TT>US>U
![Page 2: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Sequent Notation for Arguments
Sequent Notation:S>T, T>U | S>U
Vertical Notation:S>TT>US>U
![Page 3: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Sequent Notation for Arguments
Sequent Notation:S>T, T>U | S>U
Vertical Notation:S>TT>US>U
![Page 4: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
![Page 5: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
If R then W. W. So R.
![Page 6: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
If R then W. W. So R.
If R then W, W | R
![Page 7: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
If R then W. W. So R.
If R then W, W | R
R>W, W | R
![Page 8: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Sequent Notation:R>W, W | R
Vertical Notation:R>WWR
Translating Arguments
If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack.. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.
If R then W. W. So R.
![Page 9: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Which sentence is the conclusion?
Premise Indicators:SinceBecauseFor:
Conclusion Indicators:SoThereforeHenceThusConsequently:
![Page 10: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
![Page 11: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
![Page 12: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
P > I
![Page 13: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
WRONG! ‘Because’ Indicates aPREMISE!
P > I
![Page 14: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
Conclusion Premise
![Page 15: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
I, I results in P | P
Conclusion Premise
![Page 16: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.
P because I. I results in P.
I, I results in P | P
I, I>P | P
Conclusion Premise
![Page 17: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
![Page 18: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
![Page 19: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
![Page 20: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.
Conclusion Premise
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
![Page 21: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.
The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.
Conclusion Premise
C | E
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
![Page 22: Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56649ca85503460f9496ac26/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Translating Arguments
Why > is different from |.
The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.
Conclusion PremiseC | E
The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E
Click here for more