Nose as a Biometric
-
Upload
piyush-mittal -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.345 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Nose as a Biometric
The Nose on Your Face May Not be so Plain: Using the
Nose as a Biometric
Adrian Moorhouse and Adrian EvansDepartment of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, University of Bath
Gary Atkinson, Jiuai Sun and Melvyn SmithMachine Vision Laboratory, University of the West of England
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Overview
• Introduction• Photometric stereo image acquisition• Nose feature extraction
– Nose region segmentation– Curvature-based landmark extraction– Geometric ratio and ridge features
• Evaluation of classification performance• Discussion and conclusions
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Introduction
• A number of face-based biometrics have been proposed e.g. iris, ear and retina
• The nose is hard to conceal and relatively invariant to expression
• Provides fixation points for face recognition
B. Griaule, “Understanding Biometrics”, Online, 2008.
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Introduction
• Noses can be divided into 6 types
• Full 3D nose matching is computationally expensive
• Shape of the ridge important
Nasion
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Photometric stereo image capture
• Capture made using PhotoFace system (UWE)– 4 flashguns and 1 200 fps camera– 4 fames captured in ~20 ms
• Albedo image unaffected by lighting
Input images
Surface normals
Bump map
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Nose feature extraction• Nose region segmentation
– Multistage classifier for face recognition– Skin colour used to remove non-face skin pixels– Nose tip is the closest object to camera– Nose region proportional to output of face recognition
stage
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Nose feature extraction• Curvature-based landmark detection
– Applied to the surface normals image– Robust mechanism for identifying nasal landmarks– Principle curvatures κmin and κmax found via mean
(H) and Gaussian (K) curvatures:
KHH −+= 2maxκKHH −−= 2
minκ
Surface shape classes
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Nose feature extraction
• Curvature-based landmark detection– Binary convex and concave images filtered using
opening by reconstruction
– Nose tip is largest convex region– Nasion is largest concave region above tip
Before After
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Nose feature extraction
• Geometric nasal proportions– 2 ratios defined:
– Combined in a 2 element feature vector
– Width at centroidmore robust
length Ridge widthSaddleratio Saddle =
length Ridge width tipNoseratio tipNose =
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Nose feature extraction
• Nose ridge profile– Defined between nasion and tip
• Robust to variations in pose
– 3D shape captured by extractingridge points from range image
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Nose feature extraction• Nose ridge profile represented using Fourier
descriptors
• Ridge reflected to make closed contour• Coefficients adjusted to make invariant to scale
and rotationIET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and
Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Evaluation of classification performance
• Photoface database used– 36 single captures– 4 multiple captures (data-sets A,B,C and D)
Dataset C
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
• Training set of 44 images– 36 single images– 2 neutral images from data-sets A, B, C and D
• Test set, remaining n-2 images from data-sets A, B, C and D
• Euclidean distance used to find closest match in training set for each test image
• Random change of correct recognition is 2/44 = 4.54%
Evaluation of classification performance
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
• Geometric ratios results
– Poor rank 1 performance– Rank 10 performance better
Evaluation of classification performance
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
• Geometric ratios results
Dendrogram of distances between data-sets A (features 1-12), B (features 13-22), C (features 23-28) and D (features 29-34) for the geometric ratios.
Evaluation of classification performance
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
• Geometric ratios results
Input image from data-set D and closest matches from training set
Evaluation of classification performance
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
• Nose ridge profile
– Rank 1 performance much improved– Rank 10 performance slightly worse
Evaluation of classification performance
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
• Nose ridge profile
Dendrogram showing the distances between data-sets C (features 1-6) and D (features 11-12), for ridge FD features.
Evaluation of classification performance
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
• Nose ridge profile
Input image from data-set A and closest matches from training set
Evaluation of classification performance
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Evaluation of classification performance
• Cumulative Match Characteristic plot for combined features
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
Rank
Prob
abili
ty o
f rec
ogni
tion
EigennoseGeometric RatiosRidge FDCombined Geometric Ratios and Ridge FD
The Eigennosetechnique applying the Eigenfacemethod to the nose region of the face
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
Evaluation of classification performance
• Cumulative Match Characteristic plot for combined features
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
Rank
Prob
abili
ty o
f rec
ogni
tion
EigennoseGeometric RatiosRidge FDCombined Geometric Ratios and Ridge FD
The combined Geometric Ratios (GR) and Ridge FD technique uses the GR to select the 12 closest faces and applies the ridge FD to this subset
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009
• The nose’s biometric potential is largely unexplored
• Curvature provides robust method for identifying landmarks in PS images
• Geometric ratios and nose ridge shape both show the nose’s biometric potential
• Recognition currently far lower than other biometrics
• Evaluation over larger database and in conjunction with other recognition techniques ongoing
Discussion and conclusions
IET 3rd International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP-09), Kingston, UK, 3rd Dec 2009