NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly)...

26
NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION TRUST BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETING Meeting Date: 25 November 2015 Title and Author of Paper: Performance Report (Month 7). Lisa Quinn, Executive Director of Performance & Assurance Paper for Debate, Decision or Information: Information Key Points to Note: Monitor Risk Assessment Framework - Governance risk rating remains Green (lowest risk) and Financial Sustainability Risk Rating remains 4 as at October 2015. (pages 3-4) NHS Outcomes Framework the dashboard is intended to bring together local and national data to allow NTW to benchmark and improve the quality of services provided by the Trust. Data reported is as at 2015/2016 quarter 2 (page 5) Quality Dashboard at M6 the Trust continues to have full compliance with all of the CQC essential outcomes of quality and safety. Three CQUIN schemes and four quality priorities have been RAG rated amber as at month 7.(page 6). Waiting Times Performance against the waiting times standards is included (pages 7- 13). Workforce Dashboard appraisal rates have improved from 82.5% to 84.1% in the month. Sickness absence increased to 5.66% in October (in line with expected seasonal variation) however the rolling 12 month average has continued to decrease and is now 5.63% - nb graphs showing the trend in month and rolling 12 month sickness have been included for the first time this month. Safeguarding adults training has improved to 90.4% across the Trust thus meeting the 90% standard, however in the month clinical risk training and MHCT clustering training have both decreased below 90%. (page 14) Finance Dashboard - At Month 7, the Trust had a risk rating of 4 and a surplus of £5.2m which was £1.8m ahead of plan. The Trust currently expects to deliver £1.5m more than its planned surplus for the year. However, the Trust faces some key financial risks which need to be managed to achieve this. These include pressures around staff costs in Specialist Care and achieving the savings required from the Financial Delivery Programme. The Trust’s cash balance at the end of Month 7 was £27.0m which was £13.6m above plan due to the surplus being higher than plan, capital spend being below plan and working capital being higher than plan. The year- end cash balance is currently forecast to be slightly above plan. (page 15) Contract performance dashboard summaries are provided for each CCG contract highlighting any indicators which have not been achieved in Month 7. (page 16-21) Principal Community Pathways Benefits Realisation dashboards include information on waiting times, referrals, discharges, caseloads, staff time and patient flows. (page 22- 25) Outcome required: To note information Agenda Item 9 i)

Transcript of NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly)...

Page 1: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETING

Meeting Date: 25 November 2015

Title and Author of Paper: Performance Report (Month 7). Lisa Quinn, Executive Director of Performance & Assurance

Paper for Debate, Decision or Information: Information

Key Points to Note:

Monitor Risk Assessment Framework - Governance risk rating remains Green (lowest risk) and Financial Sustainability Risk Rating remains 4 as at October 2015. (pages 3-4)

NHS Outcomes Framework – the dashboard is intended to bring together local and national data to allow NTW to benchmark and improve the quality of services provided by the Trust. Data reported is as at 2015/2016 quarter 2 (page 5)

Quality Dashboard – at M6 the Trust continues to have full compliance with all of the CQC essential outcomes of quality and safety. Three CQUIN schemes and four quality priorities have been RAG rated amber as at month 7.(page 6).

Waiting Times – Performance against the waiting times standards is included (pages 7-13).

Workforce Dashboard – appraisal rates have improved from 82.5% to 84.1% in the month. Sickness absence increased to 5.66% in October (in line with expected seasonal variation) however the rolling 12 month average has continued to decrease and is now 5.63% - nb graphs showing the trend in month and rolling 12 month sickness have been included for the first time this month. Safeguarding adults training has improved to 90.4% across the Trust thus meeting the 90% standard, however in the month clinical risk training and MHCT clustering training have both decreased below 90%. (page 14)

Finance Dashboard - At Month 7, the Trust had a risk rating of 4 and a surplus of £5.2m which was £1.8m ahead of plan. The Trust currently expects to deliver £1.5m more than its planned surplus for the year. However, the Trust faces some key financial risks which need to be managed to achieve this. These include pressures around staff costs in Specialist Care and achieving the savings required from the Financial Delivery Programme. The Trust’s cash balance at the end of Month 7 was £27.0m which was £13.6m above plan due to the surplus being higher than plan, capital spend being below plan and working capital being higher than plan. The year-end cash balance is currently forecast to be slightly above plan. (page 15)

Contract performance – dashboard summaries are provided for each CCG contract highlighting any indicators which have not been achieved in Month 7. (page 16-21)

Principal Community Pathways Benefits Realisation dashboards include information on waiting times, referrals, discharges, caseloads, staff time and patient flows. (page 22-25)

Outcome required: To note information

Agenda Item 9 i)

Page 2: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

1

Page 3: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

2

Contents Page Number

1. Monitor Risk Assessment Framework Requirements…..………………………………………………………………………………...…3

2. Monitor Indicator Trends……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……..…….4

3. NHS Outcomes Framework ………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………..…...5

4. Quality Dashboard…………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….….6

5. Waiting Times Dashboard………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………….……7

6. Workforce Dashboard ………………………...…………………… ……………………………………….……………….…………….….14

7. Finance Dashboard……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………..15

8. Contract Summary Dashboards……………………………………………………………………………………………………….….….16

9. Principal Community Pathways (PCP) Benefits Realisation………… …………………………………..……………………………..22

Page 4: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

3

1. Monitor Risk Assessment Framework Requirements

Target Quarter

2

position

Trend Forecast

position

Green Green Green

4 4

92% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

95% 98.6% 98.4% 99.0%

95% 96.9% 96.3% 97.0%

≤7.5% 2.1% 2.2% 2.5%

95% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

50% 22.9% 30.0%

75% 96.3% 98.8% 99.0%

95% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

97% 99.8% 99.8% 99.8%

50% 92.6% 92.4% 92.6%

Green Green Green Green

0 0 1 1

No No No

No No No

No No No

No No No

No No No

No No No

No No No

Meeting Monitor target

Breaching Monitor target

Trend improved from previous month

Trend the same as previous month

Trend worse than previous month

Risk Assessment Framework

Monitor Compliance Dashboard

Risk of, or actual, failure to deliver Commissioner Requested Services

CQC compliance action outstanding

CPA review within 12 months

Minimising mental health delayed transfers of care (including social care)

Admissions to inpatient services had access to crisis resolution home treatment teams

Data Completeness: 6 indicators

Overall Financial Sustainability Risk Rating

Overall Governance Risk Rating

Referral to treatment waiting times - incomplete

Current

position (m7)

4

EIP treatment within 2 weeks of referral*

Trust unable to declare ongoing compliance with minimum standards of CQC registration

CPA 7 day follow up

CQC enforcement action within the last 12 months

Self certification against LD access requirements

Clostridium Difficile - meeting the C Diff objective

Data Completeness: outcomes for patients on CPA (3 indicators)

CQC enforcement action currently in effect

Moderate CQC concerns or impacts regarding the safety of healthcare provision

Major CQC concerns or impacts regarding the safety of healthcare provision

IAPT treatment within 18 weeks of referral**

IAPT treatment within 6 weeks of referral**

At Month 7 all current Monitor Risk Assessment Framework governance requirements have been met. Nb One case of CDiff (on ward 2) has been

reported in the month. * EIP data for information only - to be reported to Monitor from Q4 2015/16

nb please see Appendix A for further information relating to the EIP standard

** IAPT data for information only - to be reported to Monitor from Q3 2015/16

Page 5: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

4

2. Monitor Indicator Trends

M7 M7 M7

M7 M7 M7

M7 M7 M7

M7 M7

* EIP data is included here from April 2015 onwards for information - with

performance due to be reported to Monitor from Q4 2015/16.

** IAPT data is included here from April 2015 onwards for information - with

performance due to be reported to Monitor from Q3 2015/16.

Key Monitor Governance Indicators

For Month 7 the Trust is fully compliant with the key governance indicators currently required as part of Monitor's Risk Assessment Framework.

92.0%

94.0%

96.0%

98.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

CPA 12 month review (Oct 14 - Sep 15)

CPA 12mths Target 95%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

Delayed Transfers (Oct 14 - Sep 15)

Delayed Transfers Target less than 7.5%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

Admissions via CRHT (Oct 14 - Sep 15)

CRHT Target 95%

0.0%

50.0%

100.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

Data - outcomes (Oct 14 - Sep 15)

Data outcomes Target 50%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

CPA 7 day follow up (Oct 14 - Sep 15)

CPA 7 day Target 95%

94.0%

96.0%

98.0%

100.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

Data - identifiers (Oct 14 - Sep 15)

Data identifiers Target 97%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%N

ov

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

RTT Non-admitted (Oct 14 - Sep 15) *no longer reported*

RTT non admitted Target 95%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

RTT Incomplete (Oct 14 - Sep 15)

RTT incomplete Target 92%

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

EIP - Treatment in 2 weeks (Apr 15 - Sep 15)*

EIP treatment Target 50%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

IAPT - Treatment in 6 weeks (April 15 - Sep 15)**

IAPT 6 weeks target 75%

92.0%

94.0%

96.0%

98.0%

100.0%

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Ma

r

Ap

r

Ma

y

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

Oct

IAPT - Treatment in 18 weeks (April 15 - Sep 15)**

IAPT 18 weeks target 95%

Page 6: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

5

3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly)

PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW

Figures for Oct 14 - March 15 (6 months) NTW England Q1 - 2015/16 NTW England Staff - Friends and Family Test Q1 2015 NTW England

Reported Incidents per 1,000 beds 36.3 34.5 % of clients in employment 5.2% 6.7%

Patient Safety incidents - No Harm % of clients in settled accommodation 76.8% 59.4%

Patient Safety incidents - Low IAPT Recovery rates - S/land Q1 15/16 47.5% 45.3%

Patient Safety incidents - other

Followed up within 7 days of

discharge Q4 2014-1599.1% 97.0%

Percentage not recommending Care in

the organisation1.0% 7.0%

Current Clients 30th Sept 2015 40,931 Clients on CPA 30th Sept 2015 2,522

Principal Community Pathways:

Beds Occupied at 30th Sept 2015 (Inpatient Group) 454 Emergency re-admissions (within 28 days excl LD) 7.3% (Sept YTD)

Beds Occupied at 30th June 2015 450 Emergency re-admissions (within 28 days excl LD) 14% (June YTD)

Specialist Care Group:

Beds Occupied at 30th Sept 2015 (inc leave) 295 Emergency re-admissions (within 28 days excl LD) 1.2% (Sept YTD)

Beds Occupied at 30th June 2015 (inc leave) 292 Emergency re-admissions (within 28 days excl LD) 0.% (June YTD)

Socioeconomic Deprivation: Overall IMD Score England 21.5 ` North East 26.9

QOF prevalence - Dementia 2013/14 England 0.62 North East 0.78

QOF Prevalence - Depression (18+) 2013 /14 England 6.5 North East 7.0

Domain 1 - Preventing people from dying prematurely Domain 3 - Helping people to recover from episodes of ill health or injury

Domain 2 - Enhancing quality of life for people with long term conditions Domain 4 - Ensuring that people have a positive experience of care

Domain 5 - Treating & caring for people in a safe environment and protect them from avoidable harm

NHS OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK- Quarter 2 2015/2016

NATIONAL CONTEXTUAL DATA

NTW DATA

Do

ma

in 5

Do

ma

in 3

Do

ma

in 4

Do

ma

in 2

Do

ma

in 1 63.0%

79.0%

Percentage recommending working for the

organisation

Percentage recommending Care in the

organisation

73.0%

95.0%

Spending on Mental Health England

Newcastle and

GatesheadSunderland South Tyneside North Tyneside Northumberland Average Lowest Highest

Specialist mental health services spend: rate (£) per person  2013/14 £ 203.59 £ 249.28 £ 220.93 £ 215.89 £ 231.72 £ 151.07 £ 76.58 £ 272.45

Primary care prescribing spend on mental health: rate (£) per

person 2013/14 £ 17.66 £ 16.18 £ 16.76 £ 17.60 £ 16.16 £ 12.31 £ 3.01 £ 24.59

% spend on specialist mental health services: % of all CCG

spend categorised as mental health 2013/14 14.60% 15.70% 13.50% 14.40% 16.30% 12.70% 8.00% 20.90%

Cost of GP prescribing for antidepressant drugs: Net

Ingredient Cost (£) per 1,000 STAR-PU (quarterly)  2014/15 Q4 £ 74.40 £ 64.10 £ 64.60 £ 69.20 £ 63.30 £ 54.20 £ 22.30 £ 97.80

Page 7: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

6

4. Quality Dashboard

TargetM7

positionTrend

Forecast

positionTarget

M7

positionTrend Year End

Forecast

TargetM7

positionTrend

Forecast

position

Some improvements needed to achieve target

MH3 Deaf recovery package

Systems and processes must be in place to ensure compliance with the

fundamental standards

Sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and

experienced staff must be deployed

Physical healthcare (NHS England)

Persons employed must be of good character, have necessary

qualifications, skills, experience and be able to perform the work for which

they are employed (Fit and Proper Persons Test)

Registered persons must be open and transparent with service users

about their care and treatment (Duty of Candour)

Quality Dashboard

CQUIN 2015/16

Care and treatment must be appropriate and reflect service users needs

and preferences

MH1 Secure services active engagement programme

CQC Fundamental Standards

Carers (Sunderland)

Liaison (North Tyneside only)

Service users must be treated with dignity and respect

Physical Healthcare (Northumberland, North Tyneside, Newcastle &

Gateshead, South Tyneside)

Physical Healthcare (Sunderland)

NHS ENGLAND only:

Care and treatment must only be provided with consent

Care and treatment must be provided in a safe way

Service users must be protected from abuse and improper treatment

All premises and equipment used must be clean, secure, suitable and

used properly

Complaints must be appropriately investigated and appropriate action

taken in response

Trend worse than previous month

Not achieving target/performance deteriorating

1. To continue to embed the Recovery Model

2. To increase the recording of diagnosis in community teams

3. To improve recording and use of outcome measures by improving

suppression rates of PROMs (SWEMWEBS)

Trend improved from previous month

Trend the same as previous month

CYPS waiting times - Northumberland

MH6 Perinatal specific involvements and support for partners/significant

othersGoal 1 - Reduce Incidents of Harm to Patients

Goal 2 - Improve the way we relate to patients and carers

Goal 3: Right services are in the right place at the right time for the right person

1. To embed enhanced risk assessment/management training and review

the quality of the recording of the FACE risk tool

1. Greater choice, quality of food and timing of meals to inpatient areas.

2. To improve waiting times for multidisciplinary teams

3. To improve communication to, and involvement of, carers and families

(young carers)

CYPS waiting times - Sunderland

Carers (Northumberland, North Tyneside, Newcastle & Gateshead, South

Tyneside)

QIPP - Transforming Secure Adult Inpatient Services

Quality Priorities 2015/16 (Internal)

CYPS waiting times - Newcastle & Gateshead

CYPS waiting times - South Tyneside

Performance on track and/or improved from previous month

Page 8: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

7

5. Waiting Times Dashboard

RTT services = neurological rehabilitation and neuropsychiatry ^^ MDT w ait data excludes gender dysphoria

Waiting Times Dashboard - NHS England Commissioned Specialised Services

90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

RTT (Consultant Led Services) - % seen within 18 weeks (Target 95%)

90%

92%

94%

96%

98%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

RTT (Consultant Led Services) waiting list - % waiting less than 18 weeks (Target 92%)

85%

88%

90%

93%

95%

98%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) wait from referral to first contact - % seen within 18 weeks (target

100%)

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Gender Dysphoria - Total waiting list at the end of the month

Month 7 narrative:The RTT incomplete waiting times standard was again achieved at 100% in October. The

underperformance in MDT teams continues to relate to neuro psychology activity (not classed as RTT).

An action plan in relation to the Gender Dysphoria service has been shared with NHS England

following additional investment. The waiting list is continues to increase sharply while the plan is being implemented and currently stands at 374

patients (31.10.15).

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Gender Dysphoria waiting list - % waiting less than 18 weeks at the end of the month

Page 9: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

8

Northumberland CCG

narrative box

RTT incomplete EIP ADHD

MDT ASD CYPS throughput

waiting times by cluster CYPS 9 weeks CYPS 12 weeks

90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

RTT (Consultant Led Services) waiting list -% waiting less than 18 weeks (Target 92%)

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

EIP - % seen in treatment within 2 weeks (Target 50%)

97

0

1519

7 5 6 712

813

62

24

5 61 0

9 9 912

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

all cluster00

cluster01

cluster02

cluster03

cluster04

cluster05

cluster06

cluster07

cluster08

cluster10

cluster11

cluster12

cluster13

cluster14

cluster15

cluster16

cluster17

cluster18

cluster19

cluster20

cluster21

Average Wait (in weeks) by cluster from referral to treatment (first contact after cluster) Quarter to Date

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 9 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 12 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

31

.3.2

015

30

.04.2

015

31

.5.2

015

30

.06.2

015

31

.07.2

015

31

.08.2

015

30

.09.2

015

31

.10.2

015

30

.11.2

015

31

.12.2

015

31

.01.2

016

29

.02.2

016

31

.03.2

016

Number of CYPS Throughput Waiters (to be zero by 30.9.15)

**ACHIEVED** July 15

85%87%89%91%93%95%97%99%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) wait from referral to first contact - % seen within 18

weeks (target 100%)

Community Services Specialist Care

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult ADHD % seen in the month & % waiting at the end of the month

seen waiting

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult Autism Diagnosis first contact w ithin 18 weeks - % seen and % waiting at the end

of the month

seen waiting

Month 7 narrative:

The RTT and IAPT waiting times standards were achieved in the month.

The EIP 2 week standard is currently being measured using first contact after cluster.

Waiting time by cluster for patients entering treatment in the quarter is included below . the long reported wait for cluster 12 relates to one service user, this is to be explored further.

Adult ADHD waiting times data is included from June onwards, highlighting that most patients are waiting more than 18 weeks.

CYPs incomplete waiting times have again improved in the month and the plan

has been achieved. The number of throughput waiters was reduced to zero ahead of the CQUIN deadline of 30/9/15.

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult IAPT - % seen in treatment w ithin 6 weeks (Target 75%)

90%

92%

94%

96%

98%

100%A

pr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult IAPT - % seen in treatment w ithin 18 weeks (Target 95%)

Page 10: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

9

North Tyneside CCG

narrative box

RTT incomplete EIP ADHD

MDT ASD CYPS throughput

waiting times by cluster CYPS 9 weeks CYPS 12 weeks

90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

RTT (Consultant Led Services) waiting list -% waiting less than 18 weeks (Target 92%)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

EIP - % seen in treatment w ithin 2 weeks (Target 50%)

Month 7 narrative:

The RTT standard was achieved in the month.

The EIP 2 week standard is currently measured using first contact after cluster and in October 2015 there were two patients entering treatment using this definition - one of which was within 2 weeks of referral.

Waiting time by cluster for patients entering treatment in the quarter is included below - the reported very long wait for cluster 15 relates to one service user and is to be explored further.

Adult ADHD waiting times data is included from June onwards, highlighting that most patients are waiting more than 18 weeks.

The CYPS waitig times are reported for information only as there is no CQUIN target relating to CYPS servcies provided in North Tyneside (Intensive Eating Disorders and Intensive Community Treatment services only).

20 170 0

30

7 015

25 26

011 5 0 4

186

19

0

205

123

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

all cluster00

cluster01

cluster02

cluster03

cluster04

cluster05

cluster06

cluster07

cluster08

cluster10

cluster11

cluster12

cluster13

cluster14

cluster15

cluster16

cluster17

cluster18

cluster19

cluster20

cluster21

Average Wait (in weeks) by cluster from referral to treatment (first contact after cluster) Quarter to Date

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 9 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 12 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting

85%87%89%91%93%95%97%99%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) wait from referral to first contact - % seen within 18

weeks (target 100%)

Community ServicesSpecialist Care

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult ADHD % seen in the month & % waiting at the end of the month

seen waiting

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult Autism Diagnosis first contact w ithin 18 weeks - % seen and % waiting at the

end of the month

seen waiting

Note - community CYPS services provided to

North Tyneside CCG are the CYPS Intensive Community Treatment service and the Eating

Disorders Intensive Community Service.

The waiting times CQUIN does not apply to North Tyneside CCG and the data provided

below is for information only.

Page 11: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

10

Newcastle

narrative box

RTT incomplete EIP ADHD

MDT ASD CYPS throughput

waiting times by cluster CYPS 9 weeks CYPS 12 weeks

Month 7 narrative:

The RTT standard was achieved in the month.

The EIP 2 week standard is not currently achieved and is currently

measured using first contact after cluster - in October 2015 there were four patients entering treatment using this definition - two of these were within 2 weeks of referral.

Waiting time by cluster for patients entering treatment in the quarter is included below - any very long waits are potentially data quality issues and are to be explored further.

Adult ADHD waiting times data is included from June onwards, highlighting

that most patients are waiting more than 18 weeks.

The adult autism diagnosis team waiting list has deteriorated in the month to 70% waiting less than 18 weeks at the end of the month and none of the new patients seen in the month were seen within 18 weeks of referral.

CYPS 12 week incomplete waiting times slightly decreased in the month and remain below plan.

90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

RTT (Consultant Led Services) waiting list -% waiting less than 18 weeks (Target 92%)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

EIP - % seen in treatment w ithin 2 weeks (Target 50%)

22

8 10

72

23 20 1712

32

20

4

48

1612

28

12

27

0

22

32

5 5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

all cluster00

cluster01

cluster02

cluster03

cluster04

cluster05

cluster06

cluster07

cluster08

cluster10

cluster11

cluster12

cluster13

cluster14

cluster15

cluster16

cluster17

cluster18

cluster19

cluster20

cluster21

Average Wait (in weeks) by cluster from referral to treatment (first contact after cluster) Quarter to Date

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 9 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 12 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

-

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

31

.3.2

015

30

.04.2

015

31

.5.2

015

30

.06.2

015

31

.07.2

015

31

.08.2

015

30

.09.2

015

31

.10.2

015

30

.11.2

015

31

.12.2

015

31

.01.2

016

29

.02.2

016

31

.03.2

016

Number of CYPS Throughput Waiters (to be zero by 31.12.15)

85%87%89%91%93%95%97%99%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) wait from referral to first contact - % seen within 18

weeks (target 100%)

Community Services Specialist Care

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult ADHD % seen in the month & % waiting at the end of the month

seen waiting

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult Autism Diagnosis first contact w ithin 18 weeks - % seen and % waiting at the end

of the month

seen waiting

Page 12: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

11

Gateshead

narrative box

RTT incomplete EIP ADHD

MDT ASD CYPS throughput

waiting times by cluster CYPS 9 weeks CYPS 12 weeks

90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

RTT (Consultant Led Services) waiting list -% waiting less than 18 weeks (Target 92%)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

EIP - % seen in treatment within 2 weeks (Target 50%)Month 7 narrative:

The RTT standard wasachieved in the month.

The EIP 2 week standard was achieved in September 2015 and is currently measure using first contact after cluster.

Waiting time by cluster for patients entering treatment in the quarter is included below - any very long waits are potentially data quality issues and are to be explored further.

Adult ADHD waiting times data is included from June onwards, highlighting that most patients on the waiting list have been waiting more than 18 weeks, however some of the new cases seen in the month had waited less than 18 weeks.

CYPS waiting times have improved in the month however remain below plan.

16

0 0 0

2530

812

1

30

14

0

13

06

0

72

0

1310

0 2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

all cluster

00

cluster

01

cluster

02

cluster

03

cluster

04

cluster

05

cluster

06

cluster

07

cluster

08

cluster

10

cluster

11

cluster

12

cluster

13

cluster

14

cluster

15

cluster

16

cluster

17

cluster

18

cluster

19

cluster

20

cluster

21

Average Wait (in weeks) by cluster from referral to treatment (first contact after cluster) Quarter to Date

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult ADHD % seen in the month & % waiting at the end of the month

seen waiting

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult Autism Diagnosis first contact w ithin 18 weeks - % seen and % waiting at the

end of the month

seen waiting

85%87%89%91%93%95%97%99%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) wait from referral to first contact - % seen within 18

weeks (target 100%)

Community ServicesSpecialist Care

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 9 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 12 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

-

5

10

15

20

25

30

31

.3.2

015

30

.04.2

015

31

.5.2

015

30

.06.2

015

31

.07.2

015

31

.08.2

015

30

.09.2

015

31

.10.2

015

30

.11.2

015

31

.12.2

015

31

.01.2

016

29

.02.2

016

31

.03.2

016

Number of CYPS Throughput Waiters (to be zero by 31.12.15)

Page 13: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

12

South Tyneside CCG

narrative box

RTT incomplete EIP ADHD

MDT ASD CYPS throughput

waiting times by cluster CYPS 9 weeks CYPS 12 weeks

90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

RTT (Consultant Led Services) waiting list -% waiting less than 18 weeks (Target 92%)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

EIP - % seen in treatment w ithin 2 weeks (Target 50%)

14

60

22

29

56

3

28

11

6 4

43

17

2 30

34

0

11 10

46

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

all cluster00

cluster01

cluster02

cluster03

cluster04

cluster05

cluster06

cluster07

cluster08

cluster10

cluster11

cluster12

cluster13

cluster14

cluster15

cluster16

cluster17

cluster18

cluster19

cluster20

cluster21

Average Wait (in weeks) by cluster from referral to treatment (first contact after cluster) Quarter to Date

Month 7 narrative:

The RTT standard was achieved in the month at 100%.

The EIP waits are currently measured using first contact after cluster.

Waiting time by cluster for patients entering treatment in the quarter is included below - nb the cluster 4 data is skewed by one reported very long wait which is being investigated.

Adult ADHD waiting times data is included from June onwards, highlighting that most patients are waiting more than 18 weeks.

CYPS 9 and 12 week incomplete waiting times have bene maintained in the month although remain below plan. Throughput waiters have continued to reduce and there are now 26 throughput waiters remaining.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 9 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 12 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

- 20 40 60 80

100 120 140 160 180 200

31

.3.2

015

30

.04.2

015

31

.5.2

015

30

.06.2

015

31

.07.2

015

31

.08.2

015

30

.09.2

015

31

.10.2

015

30

.11.2

015

31

.12.2

015

31

.01.2

016

29

.02.2

016

31

.03.2

016

Number of CYPS Throughput Waiters (to be zero by 31.12.15)

85%87%89%91%93%95%97%99%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) wait from referral to first contact - % seen within 18

weeks (target 100%)

Community Services Specialist Care

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult ADHD % seen in the month & % waiting at the end of the month

seen waiting

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult Autism Diagnosis first contact w ithin 18 weeks - % seen and % waiting at the

end of the month

seen waiting

Page 14: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

13

Sunderland CCG

narrative box

RTT incomplete EIP ADHD

MDT ASD CYPS throughput

waiting times by cluster CYPS 9 weeks CYPS 12 weeks

90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

RTT (Consultant Led Services) waiting list - % waiting less than 18 weeks (Target

92%)

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

EIP - % seen in treatment within 2 weeks (Target 50%)

129 8 7 7

14

1

73

1612

914

5 72 0 0 2

15 15 14

00

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

all cluster00

cluster01

cluster02

cluster03

cluster04

cluster05

cluster06

cluster07

cluster08

cluster10

cluster11

cluster12

cluster13

cluster14

cluster15

cluster16

cluster17

cluster18

cluster19

cluster20

cluster21

Average Wait (in weeks) by cluster from referral to treatment (first contact after cluster) Quarter to Date

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 9 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

CYPS 12 weeks to treatment - % seen in the month and % waiting at the end of the

month

seen waiting target

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

31

.3.2

015

30

.04.2

015

31

.5.2

015

30

.06.2

015

31

.07.2

015

31

.08.2

015

30

.09.2

015

31

.10.2

015

30

.11.2

015

31

.12.2

015

31

.01.2

016

29

.02.2

016

31

.03.2

016

Number of CYPS Throughput Waiters (to be zero by 31.12.2015)

85%87%89%91%93%95%97%99%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Multidisciplinary Teams (MDT) wait from referral to first contact - % seen within 18

weeks (target 100%)

Community ServicesSpecialist Care

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult ADHD % seen in the month & % waiting at the end of the month

seen waiting

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult Autism Diagnosis first contact w ithin 18 weeks - % seen and & % waiting at the

end of the month

seen waiting

Month 7 narrative:

The RTT and IAPT standards were achieved in the month. The EIP 2 week

standard is currently being measured using first contact after cluster.

Adult ADHD waiting times data is included from June onwards, highlighting that

most patients are waiting more than 18 weeks. Very few of the adult ADHD or adult Autism Diagnosis patients first seen in October were seen within 18 weeks of referral.

CYPS 12 week incomplete waiting times have decreased slightly since last month and remain below plan and there are now 38 throughput waiters

remaining.The cluster 06 average 73 week wait to first contact after cluster relates to two

servise users with long reported waits - these are being investigated further.

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult IAPT - % seen in treatment within 6 weeks (Target 75%)

90%

92%

94%

96%

98%

100%

Apr-

15

May-

15

Jun-1

5

Jul-15

Aug-1

5

Sep-1

5

Oct-15

Nov-

15

Dec-

15

Jan-1

6

Feb

-16

Mar-

16

Adult IAPT - % seen in treatment within 18 weeks (Target 95%)

Page 15: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

14

6. Workforce Dashboard

Target Trend Forecast

position

Target Trend Forecast

position

90% 89.3% 90% 90% 84.1% 90%

90% 94.0% 94% 96

90% 94.9% 95% 26

90% 89.8% 90%

90% 80.9% 84% Recruitment, Retention & Reward

Safeguarding Children Training 90% 91.7% 93% 100% 100.0% 100%

90% 90.4% 93% 100% 91.8% 92%

Equality and Diversity Introduction 90% 92.0% 92% <10% 8.2% <10%

90% 90.6% 91% 5949 N/A N/A N/A

Medicines Management Training 90% 86.0% 87%

90% 82.5% 85%

90% 89.1% 90% £912,000

90% 82.4% 83% £151,000

90% 81.9% 82% £279,000

90% 82.5% 83% £730,000

90% 91.3% 94%

Dual Diagnosis Training (80% target) 80% 85.2% 87%

90% 77.6% 80% <5% 5.66%

90% 71.2% 73% 1.51%

90% 88.1% 90% 4.12%

Records and Record Keeping Training 90% 97.3% 98% <5% 5.63%

Trend the same as previous month

Trend worse than previous month

Best Use of Resources

Clinical Risk Training

Workforce Dashboard

Local Induction

Staff Turnover

Clinical Supervision Training

Corporate Induction

Health and Safety Training Disciplinaries (new cases since 1/4/15)

Moving and Handling Training Grievances (new cases since 1/4/15)

M7 positionBehaviours and AttitudesM7 positionTraining

Average sickness (rolling)

Performance at or above target

Under-performance greater than 5%

Trend improving on previous month

Bank Spend

Performance within 5% of target

Managing Attendance

PMVA Basic Training

PMVA Breakaway Training Short Term sickness (rolling)

Long Term sickness (rolling)Information Governance Training

In Month sickness

AppraisalsFire Training

Seclusion Training

Current Headcount

MHCT Clustering Training Agency Spend

Admin & Clerical Agency (included in above)

Hand Hygiene Training

Rapid Tranquilisation Training

Mental Capacity Act Training

Safeguarding Adults Training

Mental Health Act Training Overtime Spend

Deprivation of Liberty Training

4.00%

4.50%

5.00%

5.50%

6.00%

6.50%

7.00%

7.50%

8.00%

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

NTW Sickness (In month) 2011-2016

NTW 2011/12 NTW 2012/13 NTW 2013/14

NTW 2014/15 NTW 2015/16

4.00%

4.50%

5.00%

5.50%

6.00%

6.50%

7.00%

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

NTW Sickness (Rolling 12 months) 2011-2016

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16

Page 16: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

15

7. Finance Dashboard

Page 17: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

16

8. Contract Summary Dashboards

Page 18: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

17

Page 19: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

18

NTW Quality and Performance

Group: South Tyneside

Period: 2015/16 October

Target Achievement in this period

SOUTH TYNESIDE CCG (100.0%)

Comments:

All targets were achieved in October

Areas for improvement

Metric ID Ref Metric Name

Report Date: 10/11/2015 11:05:18

Page 20: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

19

NTW Quality and Performance

Group: Sunderland

Period: 2015/16 October

Target Achievement in this period

SUNDERLAND CCG (100.0%)

Comments:

All targets have been met in October

Areas for improvement

Metric ID Ref Metric Name

Report Date: 10/11/2015 11:10:20

Page 21: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

20

NTW Quality and Performance

Group: Durham and Tees

Period: 2015/16 October

Target Achievement in this period

DARLINGTON CCG (87.5%)

DURHAM DALES, EASINGTON AND SEDGEFIELD CCG (75.0%)

NORTH DURHAM CCG (87.5%)

HARTLEPOOL AND STOCKTON-ON-TEES CCG (100.0%)

SOUTH TEES CCG (87.5%)

Comments:

There are a small number of areas of under performance in October this is frequently a result of the care co-ordination function for these patients being held outside of NTW and therefore we have delays in accessing this information .

Areas for improvement

Metric ID Ref Metric Name DARLINGTON CCG

DURHAM DALES, EASINGTON AND SEDGEFIELD CCG

NORTH DURHAM CCG

HARTLEPOOL AND STOCKTON-ON-TEES CCG

SOUTH TEES CCG

Overall

7017 Current Service Users with valid Ethnicity completed MHMDS only 79.3%

94.4%

96.3%

90.9%

100.0%

93.0%

7101 21 CPA Service users with a risk assessment undertaken/reviewed in the last 12 months 100.0%

94.1%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

98.4%

7102 28 CPA Service users with identified risks who have at least a 12 monthly crisis and contingency plan 100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

83.3%

98.0%

70034 Current Service Users, aged 18 or over, on CPA Reviewed in the Last 12 Months 100.0%

87.5%

85.7%

100.0%

100.0%

92.3%

Report Date: 10/11/2015 10:50:12

Page 22: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

21

NTW Quality and Performance

Group: Cumbria

Period: 2015/16 October

Target Achievement in this period

Comments:

In October there are three areas of underperformance. The underperformance on Metric 4102 & 70034 relates to 2 clients and for metric 7101, one client. This is generally due to the care co-ordination function being carried out outside of NTW and therefore creating delays in when this information is recorded.

Areas for improvement

Metric ID Ref Metric Name Overall

7101 21 CPA Service users with a risk assessment undertaken/reviewed in the last 12 months 88.9%

7102 28 CPA Service users with identified risks who have at least a 12 monthly crisis and contingency plan 71.4%

70034 Current Service Users, aged 18 or over, on CPA Reviewed in the Last 12 Months 71.4%

Report Date: 10/11/2015 11:05:18

Page 23: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

22

9. Principal Commuity Pathways Benefits Realisation Dashboards

**DRAFT**

Sunderland Psychosis/Non-Psychosis Benefits Realisation dashboard

As a result of data quality issues arising from the incorrect application of the data migration strategy and the complexity of maintaining the current RiO team

configuration, caution needs to be taken when viewing the data within the dashboard, particularly around the waiting times. Work is on-going to simplify the RiO structure which should see an improvement in data quality in the coming months. The dashboard data in October indicates an improvement in waiting time to first contact which is now below the pre-transformation position but still higher than the aspirational standard. Waiting time for treatment has also improved and is below baseline and the transformation standard. Discharges continue to be higher than referrals resulting in a slight reduction in caseload. Staff time spent on direct patient contact has remained in line with previous months and the 2013/14 position.

Page 24: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

23

**DRAFT**

Sunderland Cognitive & Functionally Frail Benefits Realisation DashboardAs a result of data quality issues arising from the incorrect application of the data migration strategy and the complexity of maintaining the current RiO team configuration, caution needs to be taken when viewing the data within the dashboard, particularly around the waiting times. Work is on-going to simplify the RiO structure which should see an improvement in data quality in the coming months. The October information shows a slight improvement in wait to first contact which continues to be below the baseline position but above the transformation standard. However wait to treatment has increased significantly in October which is likely to be the impact of referrals for the year to date outstripping discharges. Staff time spent on direct patient contact has remained in line with previous months and the 2013/14 position.

Page 25: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

24

**DRAFT**

South Tyneside Psychosis/Non-Psychosis Benefits Realisation dashboard

As a result of data quality issues arising from the incorrect application of the data migration strategy and the complexity of maintaining the current RiO team configuration, caution needs to be taken when viewing the data within the dashboard, particularly around the waiting times. Work is on-going to simplify the RiO structure which should see an improvement in data quality in the coming months. The October data highlights that whilst wait to first contact has remained static wait to treatment rose in October despite discharges continuing to be higher than referrals resulting in a caseload reduction. Staff time spent on direct patient contact has remained in line with previous months and the 2013/14 position.

Page 26: NORTHUMBERLAND, TYNE AND WEAR NHS FOUNDATION ……5 3. NHS Outcomes Framework (updated quarterly) PATIENT SAFETY - NTW CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS - NTW STAFF EXPERIENCE - NTW Figures

25

**DRAFT**

South Tyneside CFF Benefits Realisation dashboard

As a result of data quality issues arising from the incorrect application of the data migration strategy and the complexity of maintaining the current RiO team configuration, caution needs to be taken when viewing the data within the dashboard, particularly around the waiting times. Work is on-going to simplify the RiO structure which should see an improvement in data quality in the coming months. In October wait to first contact improved and although this remains above the transformation standard performance has improved on the 2013/14 baseline. Wait to treatment has remained static but continues to be below the 2013/14 baseline and the transformation standard. Flow rate continues to be negative with discharges out stripping referrals. Staff time spent on direct patient contact has remained in line with previous months and the 2013/14 position.