North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening...

122
North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development Branch Community Services Department 201 – 3rd Avenue North Saskatoon, SK S7K 2H7 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100 – 75 – 24th Street E Saskatoon, SK S7K 0K3 September 16, 2012

Transcript of North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening...

Page 1: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon

Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development Branch Community Services Department 201 – 3rd Avenue North Saskatoon, SK S7K 2H7 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100 – 75 – 24th Street E Saskatoon, SK S7K 0K3

September 16, 2012

Page 2: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development
Page 3: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/

sch w:\active\11

Table o

1.0  INTR

2.0  THE2.1  LOC2.2  BIOP

2.2.12.2.22.2.32.2.42.2.5

2.3  HER

3.0  REG3.1  FED

3.1.13.1.23.1.33.1.43.1.5

3.2  PRO3.2.13.2.23.2.33.2.43.2.53.2.63.2.73.2.8

3.3  MUN3.3.1

3.3.2

3.4  OTH3.4.13.4.2

4.0  INVE4.1  MET

4.1.14.1.24.1.3

4.2  FIND

NORTHWES

3253776\esm\report\f

of Conten

RODUCTION

E STUDY ARCATION .......PHYSICAL O1  Landsc2  Soils ..3  Wetlan4  Vegeta5  Wildlife

RITAGE RES

GULATORY DERAL ........1  Federa2  Specie3  Migrato4  Fisheri5  Canad

OVINCIAL ...1  Saskat2  Wildlife3  Wildlife4  Provinc5  Saskat6  The Pl7  Environ8  EnvironNICIPAL .....1  The Co

2010 (B2  Rural M

(BylawHER – AIRPO1  Land U2  Saskat

ENTORY OFTHODS .......1  Pre-Fie2  Field In3  Post-FDINGS ........

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

nts

N ................

REA ...............................OVERVIEWcape Areas ....................

nds ..............ation ............e .................SOURCES ..

CONTEXT ....................

al Policy on Wes at Risk Acory Birds Coies Act ........ian Environm...................tchewan Wee Habitat Proe Act ...........cial Lands Atchewan Waanning and nmental Assnmental Ma...................orman Park Bylaw No. 8Municipality

w No. 8/94) ..ORT REGULUse in the Vitoon Airport

F NATURAL...................eld Desktop nvestigationsield Mapping...................

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

...................

...................

...................W – REGIONA

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................Wetland Conct .................onvention Ac...................mental Prote...................

etland Policyotection Act ....................

Act ...............atershed AutDevelopmen

sessment Acnagement a...................– Saskatoon844) ...........of Corman P...................LATIONS ....cinity of AirpZoning Reg

L AREAS .......................Screening ..s .................g ....................................

CREENING

...................

...................

...................AL PERSPE..................................................................................................................

...................

...................nservation .....................ct ...................................ection Act ......................

y ...........................................................................thority Act ...nt Act .........ct ................nd Protectio...................n Planning D...................Park No. 344......................................ports TP-124ulations .....

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

G STUDY, CI

...................

...................

...................ECTIVE .........................................................................................................................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................on Act .............................

District Offici...................4, Official Co......................................47 ..................................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

ITY OF SAS

....................

............................................................................................................................................................................

....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ial Commun...................ommunity P............................................................................

...................................................................................................................

SKATOON

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................ity Plan Byla...................lan ............................................................................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

i

... 1.1 

... 2.1 

... 2.1 

... 2.1 

... 2.1 

... 2.2 

... 2.2 

... 2.2 

... 2.3 

... 2.3 

... 3.1 

... 3.1 

... 3.1 

... 3.1 

... 3.1 

... 3.2 

... 3.2 

... 3.2 

... 3.2 

... 3.2 

... 3.3 

... 3.3 

... 3.3 

... 3.4 

... 3.4 

... 3.5 

... 3.5 aw, ... 3.5 

... 3.5 

... 3.6 

... 3.6 

... 3.6 

... 4.1 

... 4.1 

... 4.1 

... 4.2 

... 4.2 

... 4.2 

Page 4: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY, CITY OF SASKATOON

ii sch w:\active\113253776\esm\report\final\53776_n_nw_nat_screen_final.docx

4.2.1  Inventory of Natural Areas ................................................................................... 4.2 4.2.2  Vegetation ............................................................................................................ 4.3 4.2.3  Wildlife ................................................................................................................. 4.4 4.2.4  Summary .............................................................................................................. 4.6 

5.0  FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE NORTH SWALE ................................................. 5.1 5.1  METHODS .......................................................................................................................... 5.1 

5.1.1  Wetland Functional Assessment .......................................................................... 5.1 5.1.2  Information Plan ................................................................................................... 5.3 

5.2  FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................... 5.4 5.2.1  Physical Characteristics ....................................................................................... 5.4 5.2.2  Vegetation ............................................................................................................ 5.4 5.2.3  Wildlife ................................................................................................................. 5.7 5.2.4  Water Depth and Quality ...................................................................................... 5.7 5.2.5  Sediment Quality .................................................................................................. 5.7 5.2.6  Functional Assessment ........................................................................................ 5.8 

6.0  HERITAGE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 6.1 6.1  METHODS .......................................................................................................................... 6.1 6.2  FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................... 6.2 

6.2.1  Areas of No Further Concern ............................................................................... 6.2 6.2.2  Areas Requiring Heritage Resources Impact Assessment (HRIA) Prior to

Development ........................................................................................................ 6.2 6.2.3  Archaeological Sites within the Study Area ......................................................... 6.3 

7.0  RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................... 7.1 7.1  NATURAL AREAS OUTSIDE OF NORTH SWALE BOUNDARIES ................................... 7.1 

7.1.1  Natural Areas – West Portion .............................................................................. 7.1 7.1.2  Natural Areas – East Portion ............................................................................... 7.2 

7.2  NORTH SWALE .................................................................................................................. 7.2 7.2.1  Information Plan ................................................................................................... 7.2 7.2.2  Wetland Management Class Strategies ............................................................... 7.3 7.2.3  Linkage Opportunities .......................................................................................... 7.6 

7.3  AIRPORT ZONING RESTRICTIONS ................................................................................. 7.6 7.4  HERITAGE RESOURCES .................................................................................................. 7.6 

7.4.1  Potential Heritage Resource Sensitive Lands ...................................................... 7.6 7.4.2  Caswell Homestead Site ...................................................................................... 7.6 7.4.3  Valley Crest Homestead Site ............................................................................... 7.7 7.4.4  Battleford - Saskatoon Trail ................................................................................. 7.7 

7.5  FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS ............................................................................................ 7.7 

8.0  REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 8.1 

Page 5: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/

sch w:\active\11

LIST OF Table 4.1Table 4.2Table 5.1Table 5.2Table 5.3Table 5.4Table 5.5Table 6.1Table 6.2Table 7.1 LIST OF Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 APPEND AppendixAppendixAppendixAppendixAppendixAppendixAppendix

NORTHWES

3253776\esm\report\f

TABLES

1: Natura2: Provinc1: Wetlan2: Wetlan3: Wetlan4: Water 5: Wetlan1: Heritag2: Known1: Manag

FIGURES

Study ASoil CaNaturaNaturaNaturaProvincNorth SHeritagNatura

DICES

x A Land Cx B Stewarx C Naturax D Wetlanx E Naturax F Recomx G Best M

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

al Areas withcially and Fend Managemnds within thnd VegetatioDepth and Q

nd Managemge Sensitive n Archaeologgement Clas

Area, Propeapability for Aal Area Invenal Area Invenal Area Invencially and/orSwale Wetlage Screeningal and Herita

Capability forrt and Kantru

al Area Invennd Functionaal Area Invenmmended WeManagement

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

in the Studyederally Trac

ment Class De North Swa

on Zone, ProQuality within

ment ClassesQuarter Sec

gical Sites ws Strategies

erty Access, Agriculture

ntory ntory - West ntory - East Pr Federally Tand Manageg ge Areas of

r Agricultureud (1971) –ntory of the Nal Assessmentory of the Netland Mana Practices

CREENING

y Area .........cked Specie

Determinatioale ..............oportions, ann the North Ss – Results .ctions .........

within the Stus and Recom

and Natural

Portion Portion

Tracked Spement Classe

Interest

e – Classes aWetland Cla

North/Northwent DatasheeNorth Swaleagement Cla

G STUDY, CI

...................es Observedn ...................................

nd Quality ....Swale ...............................................

udy Area .....mmendations

Areas

cies es and Inform

and Subclasassification Swest Screenet

assification S

ITY OF SAS

................... within the S.....................................................................................................................................

s ..................

Follo

mation Plan

sses System

ning Area

System

SKATOON

...................Study Area ..........................................................................................................................................................

owing Sectio

iii

... 4.3

... 4.5

... 5.3

... 5.4

... 5.5

... 5.7

. 5.11

... 6.3

... 6.6

... 7.5

on 8.0

Page 6: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development
Page 7: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/IntroductioSeptember

sch w:\active\11

1.0 I

The City ScreeninCommunnatural a

The proje

- B

- R

- In

- F

- H

- R

NORTHWESn r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Introduct

of Saskatoong of the Nornity Plan Bylareas, feature

ect is compr

Background l

Review of rel

nventory of n

unctional as

Heritage asse

Recommenda

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

tion

on contracterth/Northwesaw No. 8769es, or archa

rised of the f

iterature rev

evant legisla

natural areas

ssessment o

essment

ations

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

d Stantec Cst sector. As9 (Section 9eological sit

following tas

view

ation

s

of the North S

CREENING

onsulting Ltds required by.2), a screenes’ during th

ks as descri

Swale

G STUDY, CI

d. (Stantec) y the City of ning must behe developm

ibed below:

ITY OF SAS

to conduct aSaskatoon Oe ‘undertake

ment design

SKATOON

a Natural ArOfficial

en for importaprocess.

1.1

rea

ant

Page 8: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development
Page 9: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/The Study September

sch w:\active\11

2.0 T

2.1 L

The studBoundaryTownship(croplandDiefenbaneighbounatural a

This sectfor the C

2.2 B

Several eused in p

ES

N(S

S

2.2.1 L

The site Mixed GrlandscapSouth Saundulatindiscontinthe northwith a ve

NORTHWESArea

r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

The Stud

LOCATION

y area lies wy for the Cityp 37 and 38 d primarily) taker Saskatourhoods in threa known a

tion providesity of Saskat

BIOPHYSIC

environmentpreparing thi

EnvironmentaSaskatchewa

North IndustrStantec, 200

Saskatoon W

Landscape

is located wrassland Ecope area is a laskatchewanng glaciolacunuous cover hern margin oery thin, sand

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

y Area

N

within the noy of Saskatoof Range 5

that includesoon Airport Mhe City of Saas the North

s a brief ovetoon.

CAL OVER

tal studies hs biophysica

al Screeningan (AMEC, 2

rial Sector Pl06)

Wetland Polic

Areas

ithin the easoregion of Slevel glacial n River (Actoustrine landson an erodeof the area, dy deposit (A

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

orth/northwesoon, which in

W3M (Figurs the North DManagemenaskatoon. Th

Swale.

erview of the

RVIEW – RE

ave been coal overview.

g Report, Ma2002)

lan Natural A

cy Study (Sta

stern portionSaskatchewa

till plain withon et al., 199scapes withied, stony, anthe eroded t

Acton et.al.,

CREENING

st corner of tncludes Towre 1). The sDevelopment Area, Agrip

he eastern p

biophysical

EGIONAL P

onducted on These studi

arquis/Silverw

Areas Scree

antec, 2009)

of the Saskan (Acton et h limited surf98). The lann the southe

nd gravely gltill plain has 1998).

G STUDY, CI

the Cormanwnship 37 of study area isnt Area and iplace and M

portion of the

character o

PERSPECT

lands withinies include:

wood Indust

ening Resou

)

katoon Plain al., 1998). T

rface drainagndscape is cern portion alacial till surfa large amo

ITY OF SAS

Park – PlanRange 6 W3

s mostly agris adjacent to

Marquis Induse study area

of the study a

TIVE

n the study a

trial Area, Sa

rce Overview

landscape aThe Saskatoge associatecomprised ofand thinner dface towardsount of grave

SKATOON

nning Distric3M and cultural lando the John Gstrial contains the

area screene

area and we

askatoon,

w Report

area of the Moon Plain ed around thf gently deposits of s the north. el and is cov

2.1

ct

d G.

e

ed

ere

Moist

e

At vered

Page 10: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/The Study September

2.2

2.2.2 S

The studsoils in theastern parea (ActHumic Gwithin the

The Land(Figure 2restrict thagricultuClass 5 Climitationcrops. T

2.2.3 W

The definpromote vegetatio(Mitsch a

There arepermaneof wetlandivided ththe wildliportion o

2.2.4 V

Within thsandy souplands. grasses sassociate

The soutvegetatiospecies dring of wwinter whcomplete

NORTHWESArea

r 16, 2012

Soils

y area is cohe southwesportion of theton and Ellisleysols, withe North Swa

d Capability 2 and Appenhe range of cre within theCapability fons that restricThe main lim

Wetlands

nition of a wewetland or a

on and varioand Gosselin

e numerousence on the lnds known ahe water intofe that utilize

of the City of

Vegetation

e Saskatoonoils where a

Saline areasuch as alkaed with high

thern portionon in the largdominated thillows. No rahich did not ed in the sum

ST NATURA

mprised of Dst portion of te study areas, 1978). Thh the surrounale is clay loa

for Agricultudix A), therecrops or req

e study area or Agriculturect their use titation to agr

etland in Caaquatic procus kinds of bnk 2007).

wetlands wandscape. Is the North o multiple wee the area, mSaskatoon

n Plain landsvariety of gr

as exist in deali grass andwater tables

n of the Northger wetlandshe smaller ware species allow for a r

mmer of 200

AL AREA S

Dark Brown the study ar

a, and gravelhe North Swanding uplandam, with a lo

ure within theefore the soiuire special is excess m

e (Figure 2), to the producriculture with

nada is “lancesses as is biological ac

within the studn the easterSwale (Stanetlands. Themake this are(Stantec, 20

scape area, rasses and sepressional ad red samphs (Acton et a

h Swale wass were cattaiwetlands. Ty

were observare vegetati9 which foun

CREENING

sch

soils with varea, sandy lolly loam soilsale is locatedd area havinoam texture

e study areals have modconservatio

moisture. Thewhich mean

ction of nativhin the North

d that is satuindicated by

ctivity which

dy area, whirn portion of ntec, 2006 ane size and pea a candida

006).

native mixeshrubs are thareas and arire. Aspen ial. 1998).

s surveyed bl and sedge

ypically the sved during thon survey. And cattails, c

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

arying soil teoam and loas in the nortd on carbon

ng Orthic Daon the surro

a is predominderately seveon practices. e soils withinns that the sve or tame sh Swale is ex

urated with wy poorly definare adapted

ich have varthe study ar

nd 2009). Dpermanenceate for prese

d-grass veghe most chare dominateis present w

by AMEC (20e species, whsmaller wetlaheir survey aA subsequecommon bul

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

extures, inclum soils in thheastern coated and/or rk Brown so

ounding upla

nately Classere to severe The main l

n the North soils have vespecies of pexcess moist

water long ened soils, hy

d to the wet e

rying degreerea, there is

Disturbance o, along with ervation with

getation is limaracteristic spd by various

within non-sa

002). The dhile smooth ands were sas it was com

ent survey byrush, Baltic

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

uding clay lohe central anrner of the ssaline Rego

oils. Soil textands.

s 3 and 4 e limitationsimitation to Swale have

ery severe erennial forature and sali

enough to ydrophytic environment

es of a large comover time hahigh diversi

hin the north

mited to the pecies on ths salt-toleranline areas a

dominant brome and d

surrounded bmpleted in thy Stantec warush, Carex

_final.docx

am nd study o ture

s that

a

age nity.

t”

mplex as ty of ern

he nt nd

dock by a he as x, and

Page 11: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/The Study September

sch w:\active\11

wheatgraBaltic rus

A screenrecords o(Eleocha(Figure 6ranked Sdeveloperelevant.

2.2.5 W

The NortNatural Athe Northblackbirdpelican isof the Nosearch re

2.3 H

The studwhere ar(from preCaswell awarrante

NORTHWESArea

r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

ass species sh, and beak

ning of the Saof rare speciaris engelma6) and in 196S2, was also ed in recent y

Wildlife

th Swale wasAreas Screenh Swale hadds, multiple ss a provinciaorth Swale (Sevealed no r

HERITAGE

y area contarchaeologicaevious studieand Valley Cd to determi

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

in wetlands ked sedge in

askatchewaes within the

annii), provin65 within SE

found in 19years, there

s highlightedning – Reso large popul

species of grally ranked sSaskatchewrecords of ra

E RESOUR

ains some aal potential ises, refer to SCrest Homesine which po

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

5060 and 50n wetlands 5

n Conservate study areacially ranked 19-37-5-W365 within SEfore the rare

d as ecologicource Overviations of birrebes, geese

species (S3Ban Conserva

are wildlife sp

RCES

reas of unbrs consideredSection 6.0) stead Sites. ortions of the

CREENING

061 and gre5000 and 500

tion Data Cea (SKCDC, 2d S2, was ob3M. ChaffweE 19-37-5-We species oc

cally significiew Report (Srds includinge, ducks, sa

B), which brination Data Cpecies within

roken natived to be high. to exist withAs such, a t

e study area

G STUDY, CI

eat bulrush, c01 (Stantec,

entre (SKCD2012). Engebserved in 1eed (Centun

W3M. Sectioccurrence at

cant in the NStantec 200

g: white pelicandpipers anngs focus to

Centre, 2010n the study a

e prairie, inclTwo historicin the study thorough he may have h

ITY OF SAS

cattails, cree, 2009).

DC) databaseelmann’s spi966 within S

nculus minimn 19-37-5-Wthat location

North Industri06). The cencans (20-25)nd shorebirdso the ecologi0). The SKCarea.

uding areasc homesteadarea, whichritage scree

heritage con

SKATOON

eping spike r

e indicated tke-rush SE 26-37-6-Wmus), provincW3M has been is no longe

ial Sector Plntral portion ), yellow-heas. The whiteical significa

CDC databas

on the riverds are know

h include theening is ncerns.

2.3

rush,

two

W3M cially en er

lan of

aded e

ance se

rbank wn e

Page 12: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development
Page 13: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RegulatorySeptember

sch w:\active\11

3.0 R

The folloand polic

3.1 F

3.1.1 F

The Fedefunction tfunction wetland fdevelopinconservasignifican

3.1.2 S

The SpecMinister oextirpatioAct legiswetlands

3.1.3 M

The MigrEnvironmCanada aThe Act swetlandstimes of A

When sitconducteMigratoryqualified of clearin

NORTHWESy Context r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Regulato

wing sectioncies potentia

FEDERAL

Federal Pol

eral Policy othroughout Cis stated for function. Thng public awation on fedence, ensurin

Species at R

cies at Risk of Fisheries

on or extinctilates the pro

s, through ag

Migratory B

ratory Birds ment, has theadjacent to astipulates th

s, shall be disApril to Augu

te preparatioed outside ofy Bird Convebird expert s

ng commenc

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

ry Conte

ns highlight tally affecting

icy on Wetl

on Wetland CCanada withfederal land

he strategieswareness, merally protectg sound scie

Risk Act

Act (SARA)and Oceans

ion of specieotection of thgreements a

Birds Conve

Convention e authority oany provinceat no active sturbed duriust. Bird sp

on occurs witf the avian bention Act. Ishould confi

cing.

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

xt

the relevant developmen

and Conse

Conservationh specific focd that has exs for best maanaging wetted lands, enentific basis

, as adminiss, and/or thees that are ohese speciesnd permits,

ention Act

Act, as admof control ovee or territorynesting siteng active neecies of con

thin the Nortbreeding perIf clearing mirm that ther

CREENING

federal, pront within the

rvation

n promotes tcus on federaxperienced sanagement otlands on fednhancing cofor policies,

stered by thee Minister of of special cons and any exenforcemen

ministered byer migratory , and all pro

e or habitat oesting and rencern are als

th/Northwesriod (before M

must take plare are no act

G STUDY, CI

ovincial, and North/North

the retentionral lands. A severe wetlaof wetlands oderal lands,

ooperation, c and promot

e Federal MiParks Cana

ncern, endaxisting criticant measures,

y the Federabirds within

ovinces and tof a migratorearing stageso identified

st sector, vegMay 1 or aft

ace during thtive nests in

ITY OF SAS

municipal ahwest study

n of wetlandsno net loss o

and loss andoutlined in thpromoting w

conserving wting internat

inister of theada Agency,ngered or thal habitats, in, and a publ

l Minister of n Canada, teterritories wiry bird species, during theunder the A

getation cleaer July 31) a

he avian breethe area wit

SKATOON

cts, regulatioarea.

s and wetlanof wetland degradationhe policy incwetlands wetlands of ional action.

e Environme prevents th

hreatened. Tncluding ic registry.

the erritorial wateithin Canadaes, such as e approxima

Act.

aring shouldas per the eding seasothin seven d

3.1

ons

nd

n to clude:

.

nt, he The

ers of a.

ate

be

on, a days

Page 14: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RegulatorySeptember

3.2

3.1.4 F

The Fishof Fisherpreventiorelease oharmful a

3.1.5 C

The primFederal Menvironmof pollutio

3.2 P

3.2.1 S

The Saskgovernmthe numbeconomic

The spec

- Tm

- Tfu

- Ta

3.2.2 W

The Wildthrough dfirst acquAmendm

- SfrSo

NORTHWESy Context r 16, 2012

Fisheries A

heries Act, asries and Oceon in all fish-of deleterioualteration of

Canadian E

mary focus ofMinister of th

ment and humon into the e

PROVINCIA

Saskatchew

katchewan Went’s commbers, diversitc, and enviro

cific objective

To encouragemaintain their

To conserve unctions; and

To restore or lteration has

Wildlife Hab

dlife Habitat Pdesignationsuiring permis

ment Act, 201

Section 6 (4);rom a minist

Saskatchewather agency

ST NATURA

ct

s administereans, has the-bearing wats substancefish habitat

nvironment

f the Canadihe Environmman health ienvironment,

AL

wan Wetland

Wetland Poliitment to thety and produonmental be

es of the po

e sustainablr functions a

wetlands thad

rehabilitate s resulted in

bitat Protec

Protection As, which restssion. As sta10 (Chapter

; “Wildlife hary that admi

an to a Crowof the Crow

AL AREA S

red by the Fee authority oterbodies in es and deposis forbidden

tal Protectio

ian Environmment, is on po

n order to co, including w

d Policy

icy was devee sustainableuctive capacenefits to the

licy are:

e managemand benefits;

at are essen

degraded wa significan

tion Act

Act (WHPA) itricts the sellated within T36):

abitat and ecnisters those

wn corporatiown that may b

CREENING

sch

ederal Minisof control oveCanada, incsits into fish-.

on Act

mental Proteollution prevontribute to s

wetlands, are

eloped in 19e managemecity of wetlane Saskatchew

ent of wetla;

ntial to maint

wetland ecost loss of wet

is designateling or cleariThe Wildlife

cological lande lands on bon that may bbe prescribe

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

ster of the Ener fish habitacluding wetla-bearing wat

ection Act, asvention and tsustainable

e overseen b

995 and outlient of wetlan

nds will be mwan public.

nds on publ

tain critical w

systems whetland functio

ed to protect ing and breaHabitat Prot

ds may be gbehalf of the be prescribeed in the reg

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

nvironment aat protectionands. The Aterbodies. U

s administerthe protectiodevelopmen

by this Act.

ines the provnds. The po

maintained to

ic and privat

wetland spec

ere previousns or benefi

valued natuaking up of ttection (Land

granted by oCrown in rig

ed in the reggulations.”

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

and the Minin and pollutioAct regulatesUnder the Ac

red by the on of the nt. Discharg

vincial licy states th

o provide soc

te lands to

cies or wetla

destruction its.

ural Crown lathe land withd Designatio

or transferredght of gulations or a

_final.docx

ster on s the ct,

ges

hat cial,

and

or

and hout on)

d

any

Page 15: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RegulatorySeptember

sch w:\active\11

- Sfrmof

Within th

3.2.3 W

The Wildor organidisturb, tIn additiovulnerabspecies a

Saskatchguidelineobservedestablish

3.2.4 P

Under thstream, wof water. which inc

3.2.5 S

The Saskcontrol adevelopmwater anwater rigfor any c

Howeverfrom the would be

NORTHWESy Context r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Section 6 (5);rom a Crown

ministry that if the Crown

e study area

Wildlife Act

dlife Act camism) at risk wake, capture

on it allows fole and allowat risk.

hewan Minises for vertebd within the shed around t

Provincial L

e Provincial watercourseThe Act pre

cludes the be

Saskatchew

katchewan Wnd protect th

ment and wad groundwahts license fonstruction t

r, if drainageSaskatchew

e required.

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

; “Wildlife han corporationis authorizedin right of S

a, there are

t

e into force within Saskae, harvest, gor the desig

ws for the pre

stry of Envirorate speciesstudy area, the species l

Lands Act

Lands Act, , lake, creek

escribes maned and shor

wan Watersh

Watershed Ahe water resater use. Theter is vestedfor the use othat results i

e waters are wan Watersh

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

abitat and ecn or an agend by or pursuaskatchewa

no WHPA d

in 1998 andatchewan. Thenetically mnation of spe

eparation an

onment (MOs at risk (Arsthen the recoocation at th

the Provincik, spring, ravnners in whire of any wat

hed Author

Authority Actsources, wate Act states d in the Crowof surface wain the drainin

contained whed Authority

CREENING

cological landncy of the Cruant to an A

an.”

esignated la

d covers the he Act prohi

manipulate orecies as extd implement

E) has deveenault 2009ommended he time of de

al Crown owvine, canyonch the Crowter body.

rity Act

t outlines theersheds andthat the prop

wn. As such,ater or grounng or filling o

within the City (SWA) is n

G STUDY, CI

ds may be grown mentio

Act to admini

ands.

protection obits people tr interfere witirpated, endtation of rec

eloped indus). If a breedsetback dist

evelopment.

wns the bed n, lagoon, swwn may grant

e Authority’sd related lanperty in and, landownersndwater or toof wetlands.

ty of Saskatonot required;

ITY OF SAS

granted by oned in subsester Crown

of wild specieto kill, injureith any wild s

dangered, thcovery plans

stry activity reing site for atances shou

and shore owamp, marsht or transfer

s mandate tonds by regula

the rights tos are requireo obtain a dr

oon bounda; but approva

SKATOON

or transferredection (4) tolands on beh

es (plant, ane, possess, species at rireatened, orfor listed wi

estriction a listed speculd be

of any river, h or other bopublic land,

o manage, ating water o all surface ed to obtain rainage perm

ry then appral from the C

3.3

d o a half

nimal,

isk. r ld

cies is

ody

a mit

roval City

Page 16: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RegulatorySeptember

3.4

3.2.6 T

The PlanReservessubdivisi

a. a

b. wo

c. la

d. lathb

The Act awithin a p

3.2.7 E

The Envienvironmoperation

a. h

b. suu

c. cawre

d. ca

e. ins

f. his

With receproponenproposed

NORTHWESy Context r 16, 2012

The Plannin

nning and Des can be takon to provid

ravine, cou

wildlife habitar significant

and that is su

and that abuhat is requireank, or the p

also outlinesproposed su

Environmen

ironmental Amental impacn or activity t

ave an affec

ubstantially se, of that re

ause the emwhich requireegulation;

ause widesp

nvolve a newignificant en

ave a signifis likely to hav

ent (2012) cnt now has td developme

ST NATURA

ng and Deve

evelopment ken. The Acte part of tha

lee, swamp,

at or areas thnatural featu

ubject to floo

ts the bed aed for the puprotection of

s the conditioubdivision.

ntal Assess

Assessment ct assessmethat is likely

ct on any un

utilize any pesource for a

mission of ane handling an

pread public

w technologyvironmental

cant impact ve a signific

hanges madhe ability to

ent within the

AL AREA S

elopment A

Act outlines t states that

at land as En

natural drai

hat are envirures;

oding or is, i

nd shore of urpose of thef the land to

ons where b

sment Act

Act states thnt. A ‘develoto:

ique, rare or

provincial resany other pu

ny pollutants nd disposal

concern be

y that is conc change; or

on the envirant impact o

de to the Sasself-assess

e North/Nort

CREENING

sch

Act

the conditiothe owner o

nvironmenta

inage course

ronmentally

n the opinion

any lake, rive prevention be subdivide

buffer strips o

hat a proponopment’ und

r endangere

source and iurpose;

or create byin a manner

cause of pot

cerned with

ronment or non the enviro

skatchewan their project

thwest study

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

ons under whof land that isl Reserve, if

e or creek b

sensitive, or

n of the app

ver, stream oof pollution,

ed against f

or municipal

nent of a ‘deder the Act is

ed feature of

n so doing p

y-products, rr that is not r

tential enviro

resource uti

necessitate onment.

environment based upo

y area shoul

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

hich Environs subject of f the land co

ed;

r contain his

roving autho

or other bod, the preservflooding.

l reserve mu

evelopment’ s defined as

the environ

preempt the

residual or wregulated by

onmental ch

ilization and

a further dev

ntal assessmon the criteriad be referred

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

nmental a proposed

onsists of:

storical featu

ority, unstab

y of water avation of the

ust be dedica

shall conducany project,

ment;

use, or pote

waste producy any other A

hanges;

that may ind

velopment w

ment processa above. And to the Min

_final.docx

ures

ble; or

nd e

ated

ct an ,

ential

cts Act or

duce

which

s, a ny istry

Page 17: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RegulatorySeptember

sch w:\active\11

of Enviroassessm

3.2.8 E

Under thallow theat a rate alteration

a. ast

b. reb

c. rem

EMPA hawithin the

3.3 M

3.3.1 T2

The CormNo. 8844with the RexpansioproactiveSaskatooimpacts. the consethe Cormcomplemdesignate

3.3.2 R(

While thiCommun

NORTHWESy Context r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

onment websment is requir

Environmen

e Environmee discharge o

of release thn activities a

lter or causetream, lake,

emove, dispoundary of a

emove vegemarsh or othe

as been revie Act should

MUNICIPA

The Corman2010 (Bylaw

man Park – 4) outlines anRural Munic

on of Saskatoe environmeon Planning Section 10ervation and

man Park – Smenting natu

ed Municipa

Rural Munic(Bylaw No.

s is a separanity Plan iden

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

site and a sered.

ntal Manage

ental Managof a substanhat may caund states th

e to be alterecreek, mars

lace or add any river, str

tation from ter watercour

sed (2010) bd significantly

L

n Park – Saw No. 8844)

Saskatoon Pn Official Coipality (RM) oon. Sectiontal stewardDistrict to su, Environme

d managemeSaskatoon Pral features

al Heritage p

cipality of C8/94)

ate documenntified in Sec

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

elf-assessme

ement and P

gement and Pce into the ese an adverat a permit i

ed the configsh or other w

any sand, grream, lake, c

the bed, banrse or water

but the new y alter the ab

skatoon Pla

Planning Disommunity Plaof Corman Pn 4, Agricult

dship by agriustain produ

ental and Heent of signific

Planning Distand landscaroperties du

Corman Par

nt from the Cction 3.3.1, t

CREENING

ent complete

Protection A

Protection Aenvironmentrse effect. Ths required if

guration of thwatercourse

ravel or othecreek, marsh

nk or boundabody.

Act has not bove discuss

anning Dist

strict Official an for the CiPark No. 344tural Objectivculture oper

uctivity and mritage Resoucant environtrict. There apes along wuring develop

k No. 344, O

Corman Parthe objective

G STUDY, CI

ed to ensure

Act

Act (EMPA), t in an amouhe Act also rf any of the f

he bed, banor water bod

er material frh or other wa

ary of any riv

yet been prsion.

trict Official

Communityity of Saskat4 in the futuves and Polrators withinminimize advurce Objecti

nmental and is focus on i

with re-utilizapment.

Official Com

k – Saskatoes of the byla

ITY OF SAS

e no provinci

no person sunt, concentrregulates shfollowing are

k or boundady;

rom, in or toatercourse o

ver, stream,

roclaimed. N

l Communit

y Plan Bylawtoon to workre land use icies, promo the Cormanverse enviroives and Polheritage res

integration aation or resto

mmunity Pla

on Planningaw and plan

SKATOON

ial environm

shall discharration or levehoreline e to occur:

ary of any riv

the bed, baor water bod

lake, creek,

No changes

ty Plan Byla

w, 2010 (Bylak in conjunctfor the

otes the n Park – onmental licies, promosources withand oration of

an

g District Offin are similar.

3.5

mental

rge or el or

ver,

ank or dy; or

aw,

aw tion

otes hin

icial .

Page 18: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RegulatorySeptember

3.6

3.4 O

3.4.1 L

Within thinfluencealso outlisystems,of this pureferencemay eithedocumenthe airpo

3.4.2 S

The Saskland use The Reghazards. Authorityhe provid

1. T

a

b

2. T

NORTHWESy Context r 16, 2012

OTHER – A

Land Use in

is publicatioe land uses oined for prot, bird hazardublication, lae point includer attract birnt that restricort.

Saskatoon A

katoon Airporestrictions ulations are Clyde Storm

y, was contaded the follow

There will be

. Sewage l

. Open wat

- Mea

- A fil

- Ope

There will be

ST NATURA

AIRPORT R

n the Vicinit

on, Transportoutside of thections of ob

ds, aircraft nond use pracde sanitary lrds or adverscts the const

Airport Zon

ort Zoning Rin the vicinitcurrently be

mberg, Envircted on Sepwing informa

a 4 km setb

agoons

ter storage.

asures are ta

e design is g

en water des

an 8 km set

AL AREA S

REGULATI

ty of Airport

t Canada dee airport boubstacle limitaoise, and res

ctices not reclandfills, foosely affect thtruction of st

ning Regula

Regulations (ty of the airpeing revised ronment/Com

ptember 11, 2ation:

back around

Exceptions w

aken to detra

given to the

sign must fit

tback around

CREENING

sch

ONS

ts TP-1247

escribes the undaries. Ration surfacestrictions to commendedd waste landheir flight pattormwater m

ations

1987) includport, with par

to include mmpliance Ma2012 to disc

the airport f

will be made

act geese an

City; and

municipal sp

d the airport

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

characteristRecommenda

es, telecommvisibility. W for areas 8dfill sites, anttern. There

management

de informatiorticular focus

more specificanager with cuss the revi

for:

e on open w

nd other larg

pecifications

t for waste/g

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

tics of airporations and gmunications

Within Part III.0 km or less

nd the plantinis no specif

t ponds with

on relating tos on airport oc informationthe Saskatoisions to the

water storage

ge birds;

s.

arbage dum

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

rts that may guidelines ar and electro, Bird Hazars from the ang of crops tfic wording inin the vicinit

o building anor aircraft san relating to oon Airport Regulations

e if:

mps.

_final.docx

re onic rds, irport that n this y of

nd afety. bird

s and

Page 19: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Inventory oSeptember

sch w:\active\11

4.0 I

4.1 M

Natural adesktop aClass 2 awas verifand low p

4.1.1 P

A desktoincludingagricultuscreening

ES

N(S

S

T(B

R(R

S

S

S

E

Natural aA map boin the fie

NORTHWESof Natural Arear 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Inventory

METHODS

areas within and field stuand above) wfied using aeprecipitation

Pre-Field De

op screeningg wetlands, nral or industg:

EnvironmentaSaskatchewa

North IndustrStantec, 200

Saskatoon W

The Corman Bylaw No. 88

Rural MunicipRM of Corma

Saskatchewa

Species at Ri

Soils of the S

Environment

areas were idook with aerld survey; la

ST NATURAs

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

y of Natur

S

the study arudies. The wwere mappeerial photogr, and contou

esktop Scre

was complenative prairierial developm

al Screeningan (AMEC, 2

rial Sector Pl06)

Wetland Polic

Park – Sask844) (City of

pality of Corman Park, 199

an Conserva

isk Registry

Saskatoon M

Canada His

dentified on rial photos ofand access w

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

ral Areas

rea were invwetlands of eed using ArcGraphs from vur lines.

eening

eted to idente, tree standment. The fo

g Report, Ma2002)

lan Natural A

cy Study (Sta

katoon Plannf Saskatoon

man Park N94)

ation Data Ce

and COSEW

ap Area 73-

storical Preci

aerial photof the quarter

was marked

CREENING

s

entoried by ecological anGIS. The cl

various years

tify areas of s, and areasollowing reso

arquis/Silverw

Areas Scree

antec, 2009)

ning District , 2010)

o. 344, Offic

entre (SKCD

WIC databas

-B Saskatche

ipitation Dat

ographs usinr sections, aand wetland

G STUDY, CI

Stantec in Jnd/or hydroloass and bous that includ

potential ens that have nources were

wood Indust

ening Resou

)

Official Com

cial Commun

DC)

ses

ewan (Acton

ta (Environm

ng ArcGIS prat a scale of ds surveyed

ITY OF SAS

July 2012. Thogical signifundaries of eed years of

nvironmentalnot been dise used during

trial Area, Sa

rce Overview

mmunity Plan

nity Plan (By

n and Ellis, 1

ment Canada

rior to the fie1:7500, wasin 2009 wer

SKATOON

his included ficance (geneeach wetlandextreme hig

l significancesturbed by g the deskto

askatoon,

w Report

n Bylaw, 201

ylaw No. 8/9

1978)

a, 2012)

eld investigas created forre labeled.

4.1

both erally d

gh

e

op

10

4)

ation. r use

Page 20: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Inventory oSeptember

4.2

4.1.2 F

Field surwas granWetlandsand permecologicawhich is wetlandsfor stormassessed

Informatisecondaincludingnatural awas alsoareas du

4.1.3 P

Followingwetlandsyears (20normal pclimate dthe low p

Wetlandsin which photos asurvey, C

The samconducteresults frNorth/No

4.2 F

4.2.1 I

A total ofbeing clausing ae

NORTHWESof Natural Arear 16, 2012

Field Invest

rveys within tnted and focs targeted fo

manent (Clasal linkages. Adiscussed in

s were not tamwater mana

d to be ecolo

on recordedry (2o) speci

g rare speciereas. Stewa

o recorded (rring the field

Post-Field M

g the field sus field checke001, 2005, 2recipitation y

database, theprecipitation

s that were nthere was nnd contour l

Class 2 wetla

e wetland cled as part ofrom the 2009orthwest Nat

FINDINGS

Inventory o

f 764 wetlanassified durinrial photogra

ST NATURAs

tigations

the study arused on land

or field invesss 5) wetlandA significantn more detaiargeted durinagement andogically sign

d for the natues), includin

es; level and art and Kantrefer to Apped survey.

Mapping

urvey, naturaed in 2009 a

2006, 2008, 2years. Usinge high precipyear was 20

not surveyedo land accesevels. Althoands were m

lassification f the Saskato9 wetland invural Area Sc

f Natural Ar

ds were clasng the field saphs, due to

AL AREA S

ea were comds that had tigation includs, and othet portion of thil in Section ng the field ind incorporatioificant were

ural areas inng rare and n

type of distutrud (1971) cendix B). Ph

al areas werand 2012 we2009 and 20g informationpitation year001 (159.7 m

d in the 2009ss in 2012, wugh Class 3

mapped base

methods weoon Wetlandventory to becreening.

reas

ssified withinsurveys (200 restricted la

CREENING

sch

mpleted in Junot been suuded seasoner wetlands whe field work5.0. Ephemenvestigationon into a devalso visited

cluded: domnoxious/nuisurbance; surclassificationhotos and GP

re mapped uere confirmed011), includinn provided br between 19mm) (Environ

9 wetland suwere classifi

3, 4, and 5 wed on aerial

ere used durd Policy Stude directly inc

n the study a09 and 2012and access a

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

uly 2012 on rveyed by Snal (Class 3)which providk was targeteral (Class 1 as they provelopment pduring the f

minant vegetsance specierrounding lan of class anPS points w

using ArcGISd using aering those fro

by the Enviro995 and 201nment Cana

urvey (Stanteied and map

wetlands werphotos and

ring the 200dy (Stantec, corporated in

area (Figure) and 469 wand/or time

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

areas whereStantec in pre), semi-permde valuable hted towards 1) and temp

ovide relativeplan. Tree stfield survey.

tation (primaes; observed

and use; andnd cover of ewere taken fo

S. Classes aal photograp

om below noonment Cana10 was 2006ada, 2012).

ec, 2009), apped using hre the focus

contour leve

9 wetland in2009), whic

nto the findin

s 3 to 5), witwetlands bein

limitations (T

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

e land accesevious years

manent (Clashydrologicalthe North Sworary (Class

ely little functands that w

ary (1o) and d wildlife sped linkage to oeach wetlandor most natur

and boundarphs from varrmal and abada’s norma

6 (488.8 mm

nd those on historical air of the field els.

nventory, ch allowed thngs of the

th 295 wetlang classifiedTable C.1 in

_final.docx

ss s. ss 4), or wale, s 2) tion ere

ecies, other d ral

ies of rious

bove al ) and

land

he

ands

Page 21: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Inventory oSeptember

sch w:\active\11

Appendix3 to 5). Tidentified

Natural A

Class 2 w

Class 3 w

Class 4 w

Class 5 w

Tree stan

TO

TOTAL (w

Detailed disturbandatabaseon a CD

4.2.2 V

A complein Table species ccommon stands inspecies, noxious aand incluhawksbebarley.

Five provduring thpussytoecattail (SSwale anwater plauncertainsupports

NORTHWESof Natural Arear 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

x C). In addThe number d within the s

Area Type

wetland

wetland

wetland

wetland

ds

OTAL (wetlan

wetlands + tr

information nce and wetle. The entireattached to

Vegetation

ete list of vegC.2 of Appecommon to tplantain, an

ncluded tremprickly roseand nuisancuded noxiouseard, and cle

vincially listee field surve

es (S1), Enge1?) (Table 4

nd included tantain. The snly with the r

the ranking

ST NATURAs

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

ition, a total and area of study area a

Table 4.1:

nds)

ree stands)

regarding dland linkage

e database athis report.

getation obsendix C. Domthe region, snd common

mbling aspen, and smoot

ce species ws species sueavers and n

ed plant specey. The listeelmann's sp4.2 and Figutwo locationspecies with ranking, eith.

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

of 39 tree sthe wetlandre presented

Natural

# (To

302

398

62

2

39

764

803

ominant vegs for each w

and photogra

served withinminant vegesuch as comchickweed.

n, balsam poh brome. Du

were commonuch as Cananuisance spe

cies were obed species inpikerush (S2)re 6). Threes of narrow ‘?’ associater to do with

CREENING

stands were s (separatedd in Table 4.

Areas with

tal)

2

8

2

9

4

3

getation, wildwetland wereaphs of the m

n the study atation obsermon cattail, Dominant v

oplar, westerue to the agrn within or ada thistle, abecies such a

bserved at sencluded narr), northern be of the rare leaved cattaed with their

h the taxono

G STUDY, CI

identified wid into wetlan.1.

hin the Stud

# (Field Che

67

193

33

2

12

295

307

dlife, surroune recorded inmajority of n

area during trved within thsago pondw

vegetation obrn snowberryricultural act

adjacent to thbsinthe, nod

as dandelion

even locatiorow-leaved wblue-eyed gr

plant locatioails and one r listing indic

omy of the sp

ITY OF SAS

ithin the studnd classes) a

dy Area

ecked)

nding landusnto a Microsatural areas

the field survhe wetlandsweed, creepbserved withy, wolf willowtivities withinhe majority odding thistle,, quack gras

ons within thewater plantarass (S3?), nons were witlocation of n

cates that thepecies or the

SKATOON

dy area (Figuand tree sta

Total Area (

234

406

450

58

75

1147

1222

se, level of oft Access

s can be foun

vey is preses included ing spikerushin the tree w, willow n the study aof natural are narrow leavss, and fox-t

e study areain (S3), mea

narrow-leavethin the Nortnarrow leaveere is some e data that

4.3

ures nds

ha)

nd

nted

sh,

area, eas, ved tail

a adow ed th ed

Page 22: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Inventory oSeptember

4.4

During deHowevertransplanmitigation

4.2.3 W

A compleTable C.3winged BConte’s Sdeer, wh

Three fedSprague’on the Stare listed

To ensurvegetatiowithin theno nests

A review (Chapterthe condwithin the

NORTHWESof Natural Arear 16, 2012

evelopment r, if this is nontation and/on options for

Wildlife

ete list of wil3 of Append

Blackbird, SaSparrow, anite-tailed jac

derally listed’s Pipit is listtatus of Endd as threaten

re compliancon clearing be breeding bare present

of The Wildr 36) was coitions for dese study area

ST NATURAs

of the studyot feasible wor seed coller S1 and S2

dlife observedix C. The mavannah Spad Western M

ckrabbit and

d wildlife speted as threatangered Wil

ned under C

ce with the Mbe conductedbird season, t.

dlife Habitat Pnducted to dsignation un

a, none of the

AL AREA S

y area, effortithin the dev

ection shouldspecies.

ed within themajority of wiarrow, VespMeadowlark.boreal chor

ecies were otened underldlife in CanaOSEWIC (G

Migratory Bird prior to Mathen a wildl

Protection (Ldetermine in nder WHPA. e land would

CREENING

sch

t should be mvelopment cod be conside

e study areaildlife specieer Sparrow, . There wereus frog.

observed withr the Speciesada (COSEW

Government

rd Conventioay 1 or after ife specialist

Land Designany federal However, s

d be eligible

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

made to protoncept, thenered. It is on

a during the fes observed

Brewer’s Ble also a few

hin the studys at Risk AcWIC), and Bof Canada,

on Act, it is rAugust 1. Ift should con

nation) Amen lands withinsince there afor designat

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

tect the listen mitigation oly necessary

field survey were birds, lackbird, Amobservation

y area (Tablct (SARA) anBobolink and

2012).

recommendef clearing munduct a surve

ndment Act,n the study aare no Crowtion under W

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

ed plant specoptions suchy to conside

is presentedincluding Re

merican Crowns of white-ta

le 4.2). nd the Commd Barn Swallo

ed that ust be conduey to verify t

2010 area would m

wn lands locaWHPA.

_final.docx

cies. h as er

d in ed-w, Le ail

mittee ow

ucted that

meet ated

Page 23: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY, CITY OF SASKATOON Inventory of Natural Areas September 16, 2012

sch w:\active\113253776\esm\report\final\53776_n_nw_nat_screen_final.docx 4.5

Table 4.2: Provincially and Federally Tracked Species Observed within the Study Area

Scientific Name Common Name SKCDC

ranking1

COSEWIC

designation2

Located within

Natural Area Land Location UTM (NAD 83, Zone 13)

Easting Northing

Vegetation

Alisma gramineum Lej.

narrow-leaved water plantain

S3 n/a 5363 NW 35-37-5-W3M 389583 5787948

Antennaria corymbosa E.E. Nelson*

meadow pussytoes

S1 n/a 5311 NE 5-38-5-W3M 385170 5789186

5308 NE 4-38-5-W3M 386820 5789659

Eleocharis engelmannii Steud.

Engelmann's spikerush

S2 n/a 5140 SW 24-37-6-W3M 381132 5784121

Sisyrinchium septentrionale E.P. Bicknell

northern blue-eyed grass

S3? n/a 5307 SE 32-37-5-W3M 385245 5786553

Typha angustifolia L. narrow-leaved cattail

S1? n/a 5361 SE 2-38-5-W3M 390156 5787995

5060 SE 28-37-5-W3M 387252 5785515

Wildlife

Anthus spragueii Sprague’s pipit S3B Threatened 5033 SW-29-37-5-W3M Heard within quarter section

5047 SW-34-37-5-W3M Heard within quarter section

Dolichonyx oryzivorus

Bobolink S5B Threatened 5161 NE-24-37-6-W3M 381930 5784369

Hirundo rustica Barn swallow S5B Threatened 5075 NE-16-37-6-W3M Heard within quarter section

1 S1; Extremely Rare, 5 or fewer occurrences in Saskatchewan, or very few remaining individuals S2; Rare, 6 to 20 occurrences in Saskatchewan or few remaining individuals S3, Rare to uncommon, 21 to 100 occurrences in Saskatchewan. S3B, Rare to uncommon, 21 to 100 occurrences in Saskatchewan. Rank applies to the breeding population in the province. S5B; Very common, more than 100 occurrences; widespread and abundant, but may be rare in parts of its range. Rank applies to the breeding population in the province. ?; means that there is some uncertainly with the ranking, either to do with the taxonomy of the species or the data that supports the ranking.

2 Threatened; A species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed.

Page 24: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Inventory oSeptember

sch w:\active\11

4.2.4 S

Overall, tis generaactivity (othereby dand educare no naalso no la

Despite tfew areaquality ha

NORTHWESof Natural Arear 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Summary

the habitat qally poor. Thor adjacent adecreasing bcation potenatural linkagandforms of

the poor cons which havabitat. Furth

ST NATURAs

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

quality of thehe natural aragricultural abiodiversity. tial at presees between significance

ndition of thee been less er discussio

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

e natural areareas are highactivity), whiThe disturbent. Additionthe natural

e within the s

e majority of impacted by

on of these a

CREENING

as (wetlandshly disturbedch has allowed nature ofally, with theareas havingstudy area.

the natural ay disturbanc

areas is prov

G STUDY, CI

s and tree std from past awed exotic/inf the natural e exception g significant

areas withince and therefvided in Sect

ITY OF SAS

tands) withinand current nvasive specareas limitsof the Northt value to wil

n the study afore providetion 7.0.

SKATOON

n the study aagricultural

cies to invad the recreati

h Swale, therldlife. There

area, there ae relatively go

4.6

area

de, ion re e are

re a ood

Page 25: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

sch w:\active\11

5.0 F

5.1 M

Due to thassessm5000, 50complete

Wd

Ds

D

M

Ce

Cfo

5.1.1 W

A detaileMethod (ResourceDue to nowas cond

The MnRseveral tconcludemeasureManagemfunctions

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Function

METHODS

he hydrologicment was com

01, 5060, 50ed during the

Wetland classescribed in S

Detailed vegepecies, mea

Detailed wetla

Measuremen

Collection of lectrical con

Collection of or texture, m

Wetland Fu

ed wetland fu(MnRAM) foes, 2010a), wo land accesducted base

RAM wetlandimes. In a sc

ed to be one conditions,

ment Classifs, which can

ST NATURAof the North Sw

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

al Assess

S

cal and ecolmpleted for t061, 5360, 5e field survey

sification baSection 4.0

etation invenasure of the q

and function

t of water de

water qualityductivity (EC

sediment qumetals, and B

nctional As

unctional assr Evaluatingwas conducss within NW

ed on availab

d functional acientific revieof the top rawas rapid, i

fication systethen be use

AL AREA Swale

_screen_final.docx

sment of

ogical signifthe wetlands5361, 5362, y at the Nort

sed on the Sand Append

ntory by wetlquality of ea

nal assessm

epth

y data, incluC), pH, and d

uality data, inBTEX / F1 to

ssessment

sessment, b Wetland Fu

cted on wetlaW 21-37-5-Wble data, rath

assessmentew paper byated wetlandncluded a sem providesed to make la

CREENING

f the Nort

ficance of ths within this a5363, 5364,th Swale.

Stewart and dix B)

land zone, inach vegetatio

ent (refer to

ding field medissolved ox

ncluding sam F4 hydroca

ased on theunctions (Minands within t

W3M, a functher than field

t was develoy Fennessy ed assessmenite visit, and a scientificaanduse and

G STUDY, CI

th Swale

e North Swaarea (which , and 5365).

Kantrud cla

ncluding covon zone, and

Section 5.1

easurementxygen levels

mple collectiarbons

e Minnesota nnesota Boathe North Swional assessd measurem

oped in 1991et al. (2007)nt methods a could be veally based awetland ma

ITY OF SAS

ale, a more dincludes naThe followin

assification m

ver class of ed disturbanc

.1)

t of water tems

on and labo

Routine Assard of Waterwale (10 wetsment for na

ments.

1 and has be, the MnRAMas it could berified. The Wpproach to r

anagement d

SKATOON

detailed fieldatural areas ng tasks wer

method (as

each vegetace level.

mperature,

oratory analy

sessment r and Soil tlands in totaatural area 5

een updatedM method wbe used to Wetland ranking wetladecisions.

5.1

d

re

ation

ysis

al). 5365

was

and

Page 26: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

5.2

The MnRwetland,

1. M

2. M

3. F

4. D

5. M

6. S

7. M

8. M

9. M

10. A

11. C

12. G

The func(field anda copy ofwetland cand cultu

Overall, teach funClass, wClasses susceptibFor moreAppendix

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

RAM wetlandwhich includ

Maintenance

Maintenance

lood/Stormw

Downstream

Maintenance

Shoreline Pro

Maintenance

Maintenance

Maintenance

Aesthetics/Re

Commercial U

Ground Wate

ctional capacd desktop baf the datasheclassificationural uses.

the data collction of the ahich includeare based obility to storme informationx F.

ST NATURAof the North Sw

d functional ade:

of Characte

of Hydrolog

water Attenu

Water Qual

of Wetland

otection

of Characte

of Characte

of Characte

ecreation/Ed

Uses

er Interaction

city of each wased), whicheet). Informan, size, vege

ected duringassessed w Preserve, M

on the wetlanmwater degrn on the MnR

AL AREA Swale

assessment

eristic Vegeta

gic Regime

ation

ity

Water Quali

eristic Wildlif

eristic Fish H

eristic Amph

ducation/Cul

n

wetland wash relate to theation collecteetative comm

g the functioetland. This

Manage 1, and’s current radation (MinRAM wetland

CREENING

sch

t evaluates 1

ation Divers

ity

fe Habitat St

Habitat

ibian Habita

tural

s determinede 12 functioned for the fu

munity, soils,

onal assessmis then comnd Manage and potentiannesota Boad managem

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

12 function c

sity/Integrity

tructure

at

d by answerins listed abo

unctional ass, hydrology,

ment resultedmbined to cre

2 (refer to Tal functions, ard of Water ent classific

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

characteristic

ing a total ofove (refer to sessment incecological c

d in a qualitaeate a wetlanTable 5.1). M

with focus or and Soil Recation system

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

cs for each

f 72 questionAppendix D

cluded the characteristic

ative value fnd Managem

Managementon the wetlaesources 20m refer to

_final.docx

ns D for

cs,

for ment t nd’s 12).

Page 27: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

sch w:\active\11

The Manag

classes:

Function

VegetDiversity/

Shoreline

Wildlife

Fish H

Amphibia

Commerc

Combi

5.1.2 I

In conjunboundary5365) waecologicaadditionaand 5001surficial nairport buwork in th

Land accthe ecoloand W 21

An ArcMthis repo

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Ta

gement Classe

n / Value

tative /Integrity

Protection

Habitat

Habitat

an Habitat

cial Uses

nation

e

v

Information

nction with thy of the mainas walked onal boundary al upland are1 was not denatural drainuffer and thehe vicinity of

cess permissogical bound1-35-37-5-W

ap layer of trt.

ST NATURAof the North Sw

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

ble 5.1:

es are determin

Prese

Except

Hig

Except

Except

Hig

-

Exceptioaesthetics/r

education/cultufor wil

High for vediversity/inteHigh for wet

qualHigh for ve

diversity/inteHigh for hydroExceptional fo

attenuatiModerate or

vegetative dive

n Plan

he field workn portion of tn July 12/13 of the North

eas of ecologetermined asnage. In adderefore it is nf these wetla

sion was notdary shown oW3M to verify

he North Sw

AL AREA Swale

_screen_final.docx

Wetland M

ned by having a

erve

tional

gh

tional

tional

gh

onal for recreation/ ural and High dlife

egetative egrity and tland water lity egetative egrity and

ologic regime r stormwater on and r higher for ersity/integrity

k conducted the North Swand GPS tr

h Swale inclugical significs these wetlaition, wetlannot recommeands.

t granted foron Figure 7 wy its accurac

wale ecologic

CREENING

anagement

at least one of t

Ma

Mo

Mo

Haestheticeducatio

Moderate foModeratediversityHigh for w

qModeratediversity

High for hyHigh fo

attenuation higher fo

divers

for the functwale (5060, acks were reuded the wetcance. The eands are no ds 5000 and

ended to con

r the entire bwould need cy.

cal boundary

G STUDY, CI

t Class Dete

the characteris

anage 1

High

oderate

High

High

oderate

High

High for cs/recreation/ n/cultural and or wildlife habite for vegetativey/integrity and wetland water quality e for vegetativey/integrity and ydrologic regimr stormwater and Moderate

for vegetative sity/integrity

tional asses5061, 5360,ecorded ontland areas

ecological bolonger conn

d 5001 are londuct any w

boundary of to be field c

y is saved to

ITY OF SAS

ermination

stics listed belo

tat

aestheducatio

fore

e

me

or

ssment, the e, 5361, 5362September of the swale

oundary of wnected to theocated withiildlife habita

the North Swchecked with

o the CD tha

SKATOON

ow their respec

Manage 2

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

-

Medium for hetics/recreatioon/cultural andr wildlife habitat

-

-

-

ecological 2, 5363, 53612, 2012. Th

e, plus any wetlands 500e North Swan the 4 km

at enhancem

wale, therefohin N 34, NW

at is attached

5.3

tive

on/ d Low t

4, he

00 ale by

ment

ore W 35,

d to

Page 28: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

5.4

5.2 F

5.2.1 P

There areeight ClaHistoricaindustria

The areathe swaleseparatinthe swalethe Northhowever that have

Natural AID

5000

5001

5060

5061

5360

5361

5362

5363

5364

5365 1 refer to A

5.2.2 V

A total of(Appendduring th(S1?) at Figure 6)

The deepwhereas

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

FINDINGS

Physical Ch

e ten wetlanass 4 wetlandlly, wetlandsl/commercia

a surroundinge and level lang the swalee and cultivah Swale (wetthere are ot

e been impa

Area Area (

21.5

4.08

57.1

23.2

50.2

33.8

26.4

4.67

20.7

46.3

Appendix B fo

Vegetation

f 70 vegetatiix E) providee field surve2 locations, ).

p marsh zonthe wet mea

ST NATURAof the North Sw

haracteristic

nds that comds, and one s 5000 and 5al developme

g the North and adjacen

e from the suated agricultutlands 5060ther areas ofcted by infill

Table 5.2

ha) QRT

4 NW

8 SW

2 E

3 NW

4 S

4 S

8 NW

7 NW

5 E

3 NW

or a descriptio

on species wes a detailedey. Two provand narrow

ne and shalloadow zone a

AL AREA Swale

cs

mprise the NoClass 3 wet

5001 would ents have iso

Swale consint to the souturrounding uural land bo, 5361, and f the swale (ing, road de

2: Wetla

Locati

SEC TWP

17 37

20 37

28 37

27 37

34 37

2 38

35 37

35 37

34 37

21 37

on of the Stew

were identifid list of the vvincially listeleaved wate

ow marsh zoand low prai

CREENING

sch

orth Swale, wtland (Table have been polated these

ists of gentlyth side of thepland. Pastrders the so5364) has lit(within wetla

evelopments

nds within

on

P RGE M

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

wart and Kant

ed in the 20vegetation sped species wer plantain (S

one tended trie zone ten

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

which consis5.2). The N

part of the Ne wetlands fr

y sloping lane swale withture land bo

outhern side ttle disturba

ands 5061, 5s, and draina

the North S

Stewar

ER Class

3 4

3 4

3 5

3 4

3 4

3 4

3 4

3 3

3 4

3 4

trud (1971) w

012 North Swpecies obser

were observeS3) at one lo

to have the hded to have

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

sts of one CNorth Swale iNorth Swale, rom the swa

nd (~2%) on h a moderaterders the noof the swalence within th

5360, 5362, age canals.

Swale

rt and Kantru

Cover

3

2

3

3

3

2

2

2

2

2

wetland classif

wale field surved per wet

ed: narrow leocation (Tab

highest quale lower vege

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

lass 5 wetlais 288 ha inhowever le.

the north side slope (~5%orthern side oe. A portion ohe wetland, 5363, and 5

ud Classifica

Phase

Open wat

Open wat

Open wat

Open wat

Open wat

Normal emeand Open w

Open wat

Open wat

Open wat

Normal eme

fication syste

rvey. Table tland zone

eaved cattailble 4.2 and

ity of vegetatative comm

_final.docx

nd, size.

de of %) of of

5365)

ation1

ter

ter

ter

ter

ter

rgent water

ter

ter

ter

rgent

m

E.1

l

ation, munity

Page 29: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

sch w:\active\11

quality beparticulaweedy spthat have

Table 5.3exotic sp

W

5000

Deep mars

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Shallow ma

Wet meado

5001

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Shallow maberm)

5060

North

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Wet meado

Low Prairie

South

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Shallow ma

Wet meado

5061

Deep mars

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Shallow ma

Wet Meado

Wet meado

Berm

5360

Deep mars

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

ecause of thrly prone to pecies) becae fluctuating

3 provides thpecies cover

Table 5

Wetland Vegetati

sh zone 1 (open w

sh zone 2

arsh zone 1

arsh zone 2

ow zone

sh zone 1 (open w

arsh zone 1

arsh zone 2 (ditc

sh zone 1 (open w

arsh zone 1

ow zone 1

e zone 1

sh zone 2

arsh zone 2

arsh zone 3

ow zone 2

sh zone 1 (open w

sh zone 2

arsh zone 1

arsh zone 2

ow Zone 1

ow zone 2

sh zone 1 (open w

ST NATURAof the North Sw

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

he invasion oweed invasiause pioneewater levels

he proportionclass, and t

5.3: Wet

on Zone

water)

water)

ch on west side o

water)

water)

water)

AL AREA Swale

_screen_final.docx

of noxious anon in areas ring weedy ss.

ns of each wthe commun

tland Vegeta

Proportio

70

5

10

10

5

40

50

of 10

30

20

10

10

5

15

5

5

60

10

10

5

10

5

<5

20

CREENING

nd nuisancethat are adjaspecies tend

wetland vegenity quality of

ation Zone,

on (%) Inv

G STUDY, CI

e species. Thacent to distd to outcomp

etation zonef each zone

Proportion

vasive/exotic ve(Cover Clas

1

1

1

1

4

1

1

1

1

1

5

3

1

2

1

5

1

1

2

1

5

6

6

1

ITY OF SAS

he two peripturbed land (pete native s

per wetland.

ns, and Qua

egetation ss1)

SKATOON

heral zones (seed sourcespecies in ar

d, its invasive

ality

Community Q(E, H, M,

M

H

M

M

L

M

H

H

H

H

M

M

H

H

H

L

M

H

H

H

L

L

L

H

5.5

are e of reas

e /

Quality2 , L)

Page 30: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

5.6

W

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Shallow ma

Shallow ma

Wet meado

Wet meado

5361

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Wet meado

Low prairie

5362

North

Deep mars

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Wet meado

South

Shallow ma

Wet meado

5363

East side

Deep mars

Deep mars

Shallow ma

West side

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Wet meado

5364

Deep mars

Shallow ma

Wet meado

Low Prairie

1 Vegetation2 Community

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

Wetland Vegetati

sh zone 2

arsh zone 1

arsh zone 2

arsh zone 3

ow zone 1

ow zone 2/Low P

sh zone 1 (open w

arsh zone

ow zone

e zone

sh zone 1 (open w

sh zone 2

arsh zone 1

ow zone

arsh zone 2

ow zone 2

of fence

sh zone 1 (open w

sh zone 2

arsh zone 1

of fence

sh zone 3

arsh zone 2

ow zone

sh zone

arsh zone

ow zone

e Zone

n Cover Classes:

y Quality; E=exc

ST NATURAof the North Sw

on Zone

Prairie Zone

water)

water)

water)

1=0-3%; 2=>3 t

ellent, H=high, M

AL AREA Swale

Proportio

10

5

15

15

15

20

5

75

10

10

30

15

10

5

10

30

15

15

5

40

5

20

70

10

10

10

o 10%; 3=>10 to

M=moderate, L=lo

CREENING

sch

on (%) Inv

o 25%; 4=>25 to

ow

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

vasive/exotic ve(Cover Clas

1

2

1

3

3

6

1

1

2

4

1

1

1

1

3

4

1

1

1

1

1

4

1

1

4

6

50%; 5=>50 to 7

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

egetation ss1)

75%; and 6=>75

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

Community Q(E, H, M,

H

H

H

M

M

L

H

H

H

M

H

H

H

H

M

L to M

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

M

L

to 100%

_final.docx

Quality2 , L)

M

Page 31: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

sch w:\active\11

5.2.3 W

A total ofand a whwildlife sSprague’W3M (pa

Table E.2survey.

5.2.4 W

Water de(Table 5.1.4 m at groundwevidence

Wetl

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5.2.5 S

SedimenSwale anhydrocarDue to rewhereas agricultu

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Wildlife

f 24 bird spehite-tailed jacpecies were’s pipit was h

asture land).

2 (Appendix

Water Depth

epth and qua.4). Water dthe deepestater (as evid

ed by the oxy

Table

land ID

5000

5001

5060

5061

5360

5361

5362

5363

5364

5365

Sediment Q

nt samples wnd submittedrbons. The sestricted accthe samplesral/pasture la

ST NATURAof the North Sw

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

ecies were ockrabbit wer

e observed wheard in 200

E) provides

h and Quali

ality measuredepth within tt point. The denced by eygen saturat

e 5.4: Wa

Water De(m)

1.4

0.9

1.3

0.8

1.0

0.6

1.0

0.75

0.75

Quality

were collected to ALS Grosamples wercess to wetlas collected fand.

AL AREA Swale

_screen_final.docx

bserved durre seen durinwithin the No09 immediate

s a detailed l

ity

ements werethe North Swwetlands halevated EC vtion levels in

ater Depth a

epth Te

ed from threeoup in Saskae collected f

and 5364, thfrom wetland

CREENING

ring the field ng the surveorth Swale duely to the no

ist of wildlife

e collected fwale wetlandave slightly bvalues), and

n the water).

and Quality

emp(°C)

18.9

17.1

28.9

27.6

26.3

26.5

25.1

29.2

n

e wetlands (5atoon for anafrom the sidee sediment s

ds 5060 and

G STUDY, CI

survey. In aey. No federauring the fieorth of wetlan

e species ob

from the wetds ranges frobasic to basid can suppor

y within the

EC (µs)

1436

1759

1931

2250

1891

3281

2596

no ac

2440

o access

5060, 5360,alysis of textes of the wesample was5360 were

ITY OF SAS

addition, minally or provinld survey, hond 5061 with

bserved durin

tlands in theom approximic pHs, are irt aquatic sp

North Swa

pH

9.21

8.23

8.74

8.59

9.02

7.32

9.39

ccess

8.29

and 5364) wture, metals

etlands in was collected necollected ne

SKATOON

nnow speciencially listed owever hin SW 34-3

ng the field

North Swalmately 0.75 nfluenced b

pecies (as

le

DO (

77.

50.

134

137

173

126

155

186

within the Noand

ater ~0.4 m dext to the ro

ext to

5.7

s

37-5-

e m to y the

(%)

.4

.9

4.8

7.4

3.6

6.6

5.4

6.4

orth

deep. oad,

Page 32: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

5.8

The sediwetland 5parameteHydrocarwetlands

5.2.6 F

Based onwere ass5360, 53functionawas asseof each w

5060 - Pr

Wetland m tall wittests its eindustriacould potscored hmaintena

5061 – M

Wetland a construdecreasehas beenwetland 5significanundergoirelatively2012 wasand othesedimentand the tobservedManage diversity buffer cowildlife h

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

ment texture5364, likely ders were belrbon levels ws however th

Functional A

n the MnRAMsigned a man62, and 536

al assessmeessed, and twetland is de

reserve

5060 has a th a 15 to 20equipment) tl site at its sotentially cauigh in vegeta

ance of wate

Manage 1

5061 has a uction site toed function inn subject to s5360 by the nt disturbancng infilling a

y healthy withs about 5 to

er shallow matation causethick vegetatd during the 1, placing it it did not rec

ontributed to abitat.

ST NATURAof the North Sw

e was silt loadue to sand ow applicabwere slightlyis could be d

Assessmen

M wetland funagement cl

65 were assint are providhe resulting escribed bel

large buffer 0° slope) septo the southwouthern endse erosion oative diversit

er quality, res

cultivated fieo the north; cn maintenansubstantial aconstruction

ce; howeverand construch high veget10 cm below

arsh and deed by the infition has effefield surveybelow Prese

ceive a scorthe diminish

AL AREA Swale

am within weinputs from

ble guideliney elevated wdue to the h

nt

unctional asslass of Presegned a manded in Tablemanageme

ow.

on its north parating the west, a grav

d. The berm or sedimentaty and in funsulting in it b

eld to the soconsequentlynce of wetlanamounts of fn of a cause, a berm has

ction and thetative diversw the surfacep marsh zolling and con

ectively creat. The wetlanerve wetlande of high for

hed functions

CREENING

sch

etlands 5060the road (Ta

s for the sedithin wetlandigh organic

sessment, werve (Figureagement cla

e 5.5, which dent class. A s

and west siwetland from

vel road (Millprotects the

ation. Overanctions of flobeing assign

outh, a gravey, it has no bnd water quafilling at its neway. As sucs been built e wetland poity. The ber

ce of the watone species.nstruction froted habitat f

nd received ads, becauser any of the os of mainten

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

0 and 5360 aable E.3 in Adiment sampd 5360, relatcontent of th

wetlands 506e 7) and wetlass of Manadetails the ssummary of

ides, an uplam a cultivatelar Avenue) e wetland froll, the wetlan

ood/stormwaned a Manag

el road (Millabuffer. The ality and wildnorth end anch, the wetlaaround the p

ortion on the rm at the timter and heav. The berm aom pollutingfor nesting ba wetland M

e other than hother functionance of wet

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

and sandy loAppendix E)ples from thetive to the othe sediment

60, 5361, 53lands 5000, ge 1. Result

score for eacthe function

and berm (aed field (wheon its east s

om runoff frond is relative

ater attenuatgement Clas

ar Avenue) olack of buffedlife habitat.d has been

and has undeportion of thother side o

me of the fieldvily vegetateaids in preveg the other wbirds; severaManagement

having high ons assessedtland water q

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

oam within ). The metale three wetlather two t.

363, and 5365001, 5061ts of the ch function tnal assessme

pproximatelyere New Hollside, and an om the field tely healthy aion and

ss of Preserv

on the west,er results in a Wetland 50split from ergone e wetland th

of the berm id survey in J

ed with bulruenting wetland areal nests wereClass of vegetative d. The lack oquality and

_final.docx

l ands.

64 ,

hat ent

y 2 and

that and

ve.

and a 061

hat is s July sh

s e

of

Page 33: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

sch w:\active\11

5360 – M

Wetland substantrailway toits northeportion owetland ohad high vegetatiowas highwet meadManage

5361 - Pr

Wetland to the eaof pasturbecause because the funct

5362 – M

Wetland Road. Prwetland hagricultuhalf of thwetland hnortheas5364. Ththe otherClass of

5363 - Pr

Wetland the adjacassessmwetland, attained narrow lemarsh zo

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Manage 1

5360, whichial amounts o the north eern edge incof the wetlandoutside the bvegetative d

on zones on hly invaded bdow zone (re1, placing it

reserve

5361 is locast and north

re, including of the preseof its excepions of flood

Manage 1

5362 is locaroperty accehas no bufferal field on the wetland shhas been alt

stern half of the wetland sr functions mManage 1.

reserve

5363 is bordcent wetland

ment was convegetation za Managem

eaved water one on the w

ST NATURAof the North Sw

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

h is separateof filling at it

east. Unlike wreasing its sd that is undberm being rdiversity in mthe north sid

by perennial efer to Tablebelow Prese

ated north ofh except for i

a small patcence of a proptional score d and stormw

ated south ofess was not ger because ithe southeashowed little etered significthe wetland howed high

mostly due to

dered on all ds by culvertnducted. Duezones and dent Class ofplantain (S3

western half

AL AREA Swale

_screen_final.docx

ed by a causts south endwetland 506

score for wilddergoing infilrelatively hemost of the zde; the northsow thistle

e 5.3). Wetlaerve wetland

f a gravel roaits northern ch of native ovincially train maintena

water attenu

f Penner Rogranted and t is borderedst side. Besidevidence of cantly to formto the culvevegetative d

o the lack of

three sides s. Property e to the sma

dominant vegf Preserve b3), which incof the wetlan

CREENING

seway from wd. A cultivate61, wetland 5dlife habitat. lling from the

ealthy with hizones, excephern most zoin the low prand 5360 recds.

ad (Penner Rboundary in prairie. It att

acked plant sance of wetlaation and wi

oad, just easa roadside

d by roads odes being bodisturbance

m a drainagert under Wadiversity, butbuffer. It wa

by gravel roaccess was

aller area of tgetation speecause of th

cluded a popnd. Although

G STUDY, CI

wetland 506ed field borde5360 has a bSimilar to 5

e remaining igh vegetativpt for the lowone receivedrairie zone aceived a wet

Road) and bSW 02 38 0

tained a Manspecies, narand water quildlife habita

st of its intersassessmentn the west aordered by P

e; however, te canal that nuskewin rot did not rece

as assigned

oads (Pennes not grantedthe wetland

ecies was eahe presencepulation of ovh the shallow

ITY OF SAS

1, has also ers it to the sbuffer of pas

5061, a bermwetland res

ve diversity. w prairie andd a score of and by fox-tatland Manag

bordered by 05 W3M, whnagement Crrow-leaved cuality. It alsot.

section with t was condu

and north, anPenner Roadthe southwestretches fro

oad, connecteive high sca wetland M

er Road) andd and a roadand the roa

asily observee of a trackedver 200 planw marsh zon

SKATOON

been subjecsoutheast astureland alo

m separates sulting in the

The wetlandd wet meadolow because

ail barley in tgement Clas

a cultivated hich is made Class of Pres

cattail (S1?)o scored hig

Wanuskewicted. The

nd by an d, the northestern half ofom the ting it to wet

cores in any Management

d connected dside ads borderinged. Wetland d species, nts in the shane was relati

5.9

ct to nd a ong the

e d ow e it the ss of

field up

serve ) and h in

n

east f the

land of t

to

g the 5363

allow vely

Page 34: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Functional September

5.10

healthy aroad and

5364 - Pr

The wetlaand an aPreservestormwat

5365 – M

Due to novegetativvegetatiofunctionascore in weast side

5000 – M

Wetland the north5001, theof Managproximity

5001 – M

Wetland July 2012gravel roberm waFunctionhighway,assigned

NORTHWESAssessment o

r 16, 2012

and diverse, d formed a pe

reserve

and is bordegricultural fie

e because it ter attenuati

Manage 1

o land accesve species coon zone quaal assessmewildlife habit

e.

Manage 1

5000 is locah end of the we wetland shge 1 due to ly to the grave

Manage 1

5001 is loca2 it was obsead; the berms over 95% s diminished, and it doesd a Managem

ST NATURAof the North Sw

weeds domeripheral rin

ered by Waneld on its sohad high veon, mainten

ss and the laould not be lity attained nt. Wetland tat because

ated south ofwetland thathowed little dower vegetael road.

ated betweenerved that a

m wrapped abare, with v

d in this wetls not have a ment Class o

AL AREA Swale

minated the wg around the

nuskewin Rooutheast sidegetative diveance of wet

ack of visibilaccurately refrom the van5365 attaineof its large s

f a gravel rot cuts acrossdisturbance. ative diversit

n Highway 1 gravel berm

around both egetation coland mainly low prairie o

of Manage 1

CREENING

sch

wet meadow e remainder

oad on its noe. Wetland 5ersity, and sland water q

ity from the aecorded for ntage point aed a managesize, vegetat

ad (60th Stres the shallowWetland 50

ty on the nor

16 to the easm had been pthe south an

onsisting of obecause theor wet mead.

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

zone, whichr of the wetla

ortheast side5364 attainedscored high iquality, and w

adjacent roathe whole wat the northeement classtive pattern,

eet West). Ow marsh zon000 was assirthern edge

st and 60th Sput in about nd eastern sonly invasiveere is no bufow vegetatio

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

h began at thand.

e, railway on d a Managein functions wildlife habit

ad, vegetativwetland, but aend was uses of Manage and buffer l

Other than thne, splitting itigned a Manof the wetla

Street West t5 to 10 m n

sides of the we and exoticffer, it is locaon zone. We

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

he edge of t

its west sidement Class of flood / tat.

ve zones anda general ided in the 1 with a hig

located on it

he gravel roat from wetlannagement Clnd and the

to the south.orth of the wetland. The species.

ated beside aetland 5001

_final.docx

he

e, of

d ea of

gh ts

ad at nd lass

. In

e

a was

Page 35: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY, CITY OF SASKATOON Functional Assessment of the North Swale September 16, 2012

sch w:\active\113253776\esm\report\final\53776_n_nw_nat_screen_final.docx 5.11

Table 5.5: Wetland Management Classes – Results

Functions Wetland ID

5000 5001 5060 5061 5360 5361 5362 5363 5364 5365

Vegetative Diversity High High High High High Exceptional* High Exceptional* High High

Maintenance of Characteristic Hydrological Regime

Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate

Flood/Stormwater/ Attenuation Moderate High High Moderate Moderate High Moderate High High Moderate

Downstream Water Quality Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate

Maintenance of Wetland Water Quality Moderate Moderate High Moderate Moderate Exceptional Moderate Exceptional High Moderate

Shoreline Protection Not

Applicable Not

Applicable Not

Applicable Not

Applicable Not

ApplicableNot

Applicable Not

ApplicableNot

Applicable Not

ApplicableNot

Applicable

Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Structure

Moderate Moderate High Moderate High High Moderate High High High

Maintenance of Characteristic Fish Habitat

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Moderate Not Applicable Moderate Moderate Not

ApplicableNot

Applicable

Maintenance of Characteristic Amphibian Habitat

Moderate Low Moderate Low Moderate Low Moderate Low Moderate Low

Aesthetics/Recreation/ Education/Cultural Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate

Commercial Uses Not

Applicable Not

Applicable Not

Applicable Not

Applicable Not

ApplicableNot Applicable

Not Applicable

Not ApplicableNot

ApplicableNot

Applicable

Groundwater Interaction Combination Discharge, Recharge

*Exceptional given because of the presence of a provincially tracked species, which results in the wetland being classified as Preserve.

Highlighted boxes indicate the function(s) that determined the Wetland Management Class.

Page 36: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development
Page 37: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Heritage ASeptember

sch w:\active\11

6.0 H

6.1 M

As a partreview wAssessmdetermin

The follo

Hof

AB

S

D

H

R

S

P

Known aCulture, aarchaeolformat toGeoSaskSensitiveby the Hepotential

Soil typeinformatiHistoricaExamininintact for

NORTHWESAssessment r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Heritage

METHODS

t of the Northwas conductement (HRIA)

e heritage s

wing source

Heritage Senf Parks, Cult

ArchaeologicBranch, Minis

Saskatchewa

Dominion Lan

Historic Air P

Recent Satel

Soil Survey o

Previous Stud

rchaeologicaand Sport (Hogical sites

o a shapefilek website. The for heritageeritage Cons.

s, surficial gon pertaininl imagery wa

ng the oldestrm available,

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

Assessm

S

h / Northwesed to identifyprior to deve

sensitive are

es were cons

sitivity Screeture, and Sp

al Inventory stry of Parks

an Homestea

nd Survey M

hotos (Inform

lite Imagery

of Saskatche

dies (see be

al site locatiHeritage Conwithin the st to be used his data shoe resources servation Br

eology, andg to landscaas examinedt imagery av, as well as o

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

ment

st Natural Ary areas that elopment. Fias.

sulted:

ening Data, port) and acc

for the Provs, Culture, an

ad Records

Maps (Saska

mation Serv

(City of Sas

ewan Maps

elow)

on data wasnservation Btudy area. Tin ArcMap. H

ows which quwithin the stanch based

glacial drift ape formatiod for areas svailable enabobserve the

CREENING

rea Screeninmay requireield and des

created by Hcessed on th

vince of Sasnd Sport)

(Saskatchew

tchewan Arc

ice Corporat

skatoon)

s received froBranch). Thishis data wasHeritage senuarter sectiotudy area. Ton set criter

thickness wn and the lik

surrounding bled the exarate of dete

G STUDY, CI

ng Study, a he a Heritage sktop studies

Heritage Cohe GeoSask

katchewan (

wan Archive

chives Board

tion – ISC)

om Saskatcs informations converted nsitivity data

ons are categThe Sensitivria for determ

were also exakelihood of aeach of the

amination hiserioration of t

ITY OF SAS

heritage andResource Im

s were cond

nservation Bk Website

(Heritage Co

es Board)

d)

hewan Minisn includes alfrom an exc

a was downlogorized as S

vity rankings mining archa

amined. Thisarchaeologictwo known h

storic sites inthe site.

SKATOON

d archaeologmpact ucted to

Branch (Mini

onservation

stry of Parksll recorded

cel spreadshoaded from

Sensitive andare determi

aeological

s data providcal preservathomestead sn their most

6.1

gical

istry

s,

heet the d Not ned

des tion. sites.

Page 38: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Heritage ASeptember

6.2

Satellite cultivatioprairie arsites are have bee

Dominionthe survesurveyorwell as th

The SaskSaskatchHomesteages, the

A Heritagpreviouscurrent sexaminedparticula

6.2 F

6.2.1 A

Areas of eroding gand therebeen deshomesteHeritage water bo

6.2.2 AD

Areas reqwere deeconsiderestandard

Wu

W

NORTHWESAssessment r 16, 2012

imagery wason) and areasre considerethought to h

en disturbed

n Land Survey area. Thes in the late he location o

katchewan Hhewan Archiead records e number an

ge Report Rely conducted

study area (Wd to see if thrly for the Ca

FINDINGS

Areas of No

no further cglacial till. Thefore no potestroyed by thads indicateSensitivity Sdies.

Areas RequDevelopme

quiring an Hemed sensitied sensitive criteria outl

Within the sanless it is sh

Within 1 km o

ST NATURA

s looked at is that are st

ed to have hihave more p by the plow

ey (DLS) maese maps pro

1800’s to eaof trails and h

Homestead ves Board foprovide infor

nd size of bu

eview was ad in the areaWalker 1983hey containeaswell and V

o Further Co

oncern (greehere are no ential for dehe plow. Theed on DLS mScreening D

uiring Heritant

HRIA prior to ive if they ha if they contained by Heri

me quarter shown to be o

of permanen

AL AREA S

n order to deill intact (ie. gher heritag

potential to pw.

aps from theovide informarly 1900’s. historic hom

Index Databor the knownrmation suchildings on th

also conducta. The study, Stantec 19

ed any additiValley Crest

oncern

en areas, reknown areaseply buried s

ere are no knmaps. They hData. These a

age Resourc

developmead known sitained unbroitage Conse

section as (oof low heritag

nt rivers/strea

CREENING

sch

etermine arenative prairi

ge sensitivityprovide inform

e Saskatchewmation conce

They show tmesteads in t

base recordsn homesteadh as patent d

he property,

ted of all knoy boundaries998, and AMonal informaHomestead

efer to Figures of blowingsites. Any sinown sites inhave not beeare areas th

ces Impact

nt were detetes or knownken native p

ervation Bran

or within 500ge significan

ams;

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

eas that have). Lands th

y, because umation abou

wan Archiveerning each tthe topograpthe area.

s were also rd sites withindate, land owas well as liv

own relevants of three of

MEC 2002). Tation on knod sites.

e 8) are loca sand or riveites that do en these areaen indicated at are not in

Assessme

ermined usinn historic hoprairie, and mnch:

0 m of) a prence;

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

ve been distuhat are class

undisturbed aut the past th

es Board wetownship recphy of this ti

retrieved fron the study awnership, favestock info

t archaeologthese report

These reportown sites in t

ated in regioner deposits iexist, therefoas, and no has “sensitiv

n close proxi

nt (HRIA) P

ng several famesteads. Tmet some of

eviously reco

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

urbed (ie. sified as natarchaeologic

han those tha

ere studied wcorded by me period, a

m the area. The amily namesormation.

gical reports ts fall within ts were the study are

ns of cultivatn these areaore, will haveistoric

ve” in the mity to majo

Prior to

actors. AreasThey were af the followin

orded site,

_final.docx

ive cal at

within

as

s and

our

ea,

ted as, e

or

s lso

ng

Page 39: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Heritage ASeptember

sch w:\active\11

W

Wle

W

Oq

Table 6.1heritage

16-37-06-W

NW 22-37-

NE 22-37-0

SE 22-37-0

SW 2-38-5

If a deveof Parks because Branch ubut recogThis can to the He

6.2.3 A

A summaSpecific dSaskatoo

Caswell

The Caswthat patereported foundatiomore mo

NORTHWESAssessment r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Within 1 km o

Within 1 km oength/width;

Within 1 km o

On hummockuarter sectio

1 outlines thesensitivity (s

W3M

-06-W3M

06-W3M

06-W3M

5-W3M

lopment withCulture andthese lands

usually requignize that thbe done by

eritage Cons

Archaeolog

ary of the arcdiscussion oon Trail are i

Homestead

well Homestent was gran

to have beeons are still vodern constru

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

of well-forme

of permanen

of smaller wa

ky terrain (deon).

e quarter seshown in pin

Table 6.1:

SE 27-37-06-W

NE 18-37-05-W

NE 20-37-05-W

SW 20-37-05-W

SW 23-37-5-W

hin these are Sport), they

s meet the crres an HRIAis recommesubmitting a

servation Bra

gical Sites w

chaeologicaon the Caswincluded bel

d Site

tead site is lted to John

en built arounvisible. Theruction due to

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

ed valleys co

nt/seasonal w

ater bodies t

efined by 3 o

ections that mnk on Figure

Heritag

W3M SW 28

W3M NE 28

W3M SE 28

W3M NW 2

W3M SE 20

eas was refey would mosriteria, outlin

A. For thesendation musa referral foranch prior to

within the St

al sites locatewell and Valle

ow.

ocated withiJ. Caswell innd the samere are 3 buildo evidence o

CREENING

ontaining pe

water bodies

that are loca

or more cont

met the abov8).

e Sensitive

8-37-05-W3M

8-37-05-W3M

8-37-05-W3M

7-37-05-W3M

0-37-5-W3M

erred to the st likely returned above, ureasons, we

st be vetted rm (or simplyo developme

tudy Area

ed within theey Crest Hom

n SW 28-37n 1907. His e time. The hdings that arof electrical c

G STUDY, CI

rmanent and

s that are gre

ated in well-d

tour intervals

ve criteria an

e Quarter Se

SW 34-37-

NE 34-37-

SE 34-37-

NW 35-37-

Heritage Corn a requiremunder which e recommenby the Heritay a permit ap

ent.

e study areamestead Site

7-5-W3M. Hohouse was b

house has bre still standiconduit, or m

ITY OF SAS

d/or seasona

eater than 2

defined drain

s and 4 or m

nd were dee

ections

-05-W3M S

-05-W3M N

05-W3M N

-05-W3M S

onservation Bment for an HHeritage Co

nd an HRIA oage Conservpplication fo

is presentees and the B

omestead rebuilt in 1903

burned downing, which amay be olde

SKATOON

al watercour

2 km in

nage basins

more sloughs

emed to have

SW 35-37-05-W

NW-17-37-05-W

NW 26-37-05-W

SW 26-37-05-W

Branch (MinHRIA. This ionservation on these arevation Branc

or the HRIA w

d in Table 6Battleford –

ecords indica3 and a stabln but concretppear to be r buildings

6.3

rses;

s;

s per

e

W3M

W3M

W3M

W3M

istry s

eas ch. work)

6.2.

ate le is te of a

Page 40: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Heritage ASeptember

6.4

altered infoundatiocenter ofartifacts into the 1possibly FbNq-8 a

This site Conserva“Reconnadesired igeophyswith this archaeolwill be reimpact bywould be

If significforward tbuffers o

In the intincluding

Valley C

The quarand this athe river.1983) at scatteredpit was kdepressiovisible atRebar), s

Owing to

An HRIAResourcein the ProThis affoBranch a

NORTHWESAssessment r 16, 2012

n more recenon. A ditch isf the yard, polocated with1960's. A raithe location

and included

was subjectation Branchaissance” phn the area, iical survey thomestead.ogical rema

equired on thy developme

e no setback

cant archaeoto either comof avoidance

erim, develog the tree row

Crest Homes

rter section oarea also ha There is althis location

d on the valleknown to exison. Field invt this homestsince 1892, w

o time constr

A should be ce Record Foovince’s Inverds the site s

and an HRIA

ST NATURA

nt years. Thes located on ossibly the loin the site arsed edge caof an old fe

d in the Arch

t to a field vih, and do sohase of archs to map theo determine If the resultins that wou

he site and thent. Developks required.

ological matemplete a salv

for the site.

opment shouws west of th

stead Site

of SW 23-37as high potenso a possibl

n. In previousey rim near st on the Havestigations ftead site. Thwas the Tem

raints, this si

conducted toorm should bentory of Arcsome protec

A would be re

AL AREA S

ere is a well the north ed

ocation of anrea. The farman be seen once line. Th

haeological I

sit to confirmme basic ma

haeological ee site in detae if there are ts of this stud

uld warrant fuhe detailed mpment would

erials were evage excava

uld avoid thehe concrete

7-5-W3M conntial for pre-le child burias studies (StHarris Reba

arris Rebar lefound that th

he previous omperance Co

ite was conf

o map the sitbe submittedchaeologicaction in that equired prior

CREENING

sch

approximatdge of the yan old outbuilmyard is repon the northeis site has bnventory for

m its existenapping. Thisevaluation. Tail and condusignificant idy determineurther study map will be cd then be allo

encounteredation, provide

e main area foundation.

ntains a hom-contact archal (word of mtantec 1998

ar. It was noteases in closhere were twowner of Seolonization S

irmed as to

te in detail. Ad to Heritagel Sites and oit would thenr to impact b

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

tely 5 m to thard, and a mding. There

ported to havern and eas

been given thr the Provinc

ce, record its is typically The next phauct test excantact archaee that there through excconsidered aowed to proc

, recommene interpretive

of standing

mestead sitehaeological smouth to City), manganested that a stose proximity

wo cellar depection 23-37-Society (Cer

location and

A Saskatchee Conservatiobtain a Bordn be flaggedby developm

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

he northwesmound is loca

are many pve been occtern edges ohe Borden Dce of Saskatc

t with the Hethe first, or

ase, should davations or (eological remare no signi

cavation, thean adequateceed in the a

ndations woue data if des

structures a

e (Valley Cresites due to y of Saskatose tinted glaone foundat

y to an apparpressions tha-05-W3M (prtificate of tit

d existence o

ewan Archaeon Branch toden Designa

d with Heritagment.

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

t of the housated in the ost-1920's e

cupied at leaof the site,

Designation chewan.

eritage

developmen(if desired) amains associficant en no more we mitigation oarea and the

uld be put sired, or esta

nd junk piles

est Homesteits proximity

oon Engineerass was founion and refurent cellar at were still rior to Harrisle # 131.A.4

only.

eological o record theation for the ge Conserva

_final.docx

se

era st

nt be a ciated

work of ere

ablish

s,

ad) y to rs

nd se

s 40).

e site site.

ation

Page 41: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/Heritage ASeptember

sch w:\active\11

The HRIAsignificangeophysarea. A g(such as may be vtradition may wishand over

If the resremains from an aabove. If forward testablish

In the intproperty impacting

It should and in faof the stufrom Harsite. Durito looking

Battlefor

ExaminaNW 16-3portion o

Section 1exist in thhowevercase any

Due to noas part o

NORTHWESAssessment r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

A should incnt intact archical survey is

geophysical a grave sha

very difficult may becomeh to considerlooks the riv

sults of this sthat would warchaeologicf significant ato either comh buffers of a

erim, develoto the edge g the site at

be noted thct the major

udy area for rris Rebar woing the field g for the site

rd - Saskato

tion of the D37-06-W3M, of the Battlefo

16 and SW 1he area. Any, an HRIA isy intact remn

o land accesof the current

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

clude test exhaeological rs recommensurvey is a n

aft) in the areto pinpoint ee the best evr establishin

ver and woul

study determwarrant furthcal perspectarchaeologic

mplete a salvavoidance fo

opment shouof the river. this time.

at the site exrity of the sitethis screeniould be requwork for this

e and so had

oon Trail

Dominion LanNE 16-37-0ord – Saska

15-37-06-W3y remnants os recommendnants of the t

ss permissiot study.

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

xcavations anremains assnded owing tnon-intrusiveea. It shouldexactly withividence that

ng a general ld be well su

mine that theer study throive; with thecal materialsvage excavaor the site.

uld avoid theBased on o

xists right one extends nong. If this is

uired to go os study, the fd permission

nd Survey M6-W3M, SE toon Trail.

3M are cultivof the trail thded prior to trail exist the

on, the wetla

CREENING

nd a geophysociated withto the possibe way of det be noted, hn the total at can be obtasetback aro

uited for a na

re are no sigough excava exception o

s were encouation, provide

e area from tour observati

n the east-worth into the in fact land n to the sitefield crew st

n to do inves

Maps from 1916-37-06-W

vated, with that were in cdevelopmenere.

and margins

G STUDY, CI

ysical surveyh this homesbility of a smtermining if thowever, tharea of the siained regard

ound the areatural walkin

gnificant arcation, then nof setbacks funtered, rece interpretive

the east fencions in the fi

west quarter sNW of 23-3owned by H

e and do a detopped in at stigations con

901 quarter W3M, and SW

he exceptioncultivation wint for the unc

along the tr

ITY OF SAS

y to determinstead. In thismall unmarkethere are disat an unmarkte. For that ding the buria. The area

ng trail area.

haeological no more workfor the grave

commendatioe data if des

ce of the Haield, Harris R

section line 37-5-W3M, wHarris Rebar,etailed investhe Harris Rnducted und

sections indW 15-37-06-

n of some wll have beencultivated we

rail route wer

SKATOON

ne if there ars instance, a ed grave in thsturbed soilsked infant bureason, oralial and the cis very attra

homestead k will be reqe as discussons would besired, and

arris Rebar Rebar is not

of Section 2which is not p, permissionstigation of thRebar office der this study

dicates that -W3M contai

wetlands thatn destroyed; etland marg

re not exam

6.5

re

he s urial

city active

uired sed e put

23 part

n he prior y.

in a

t

ins in

ined

Page 42: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY, CITY OF SASKATOON Heritage Assessment September 16, 2012

sch w:\active\113253776\esm\report\final\53776_n_nw_nat_screen_final.docx 6.6

Table 6.2: Known Archaeological Sites within the Study Area

Site Name Borden Land Location UTM (NAD 83, Zone 13)

Description Recommendation Easting Northing

Caswell Homestead Site

FbNq-8 SW 26-37-5-W3M

386085 5784985 Historic remains of the homestead John J. Caswell.

HRIA prior to disturbance by development.

Valley Crest Homestead Site

TBA NE 23-37-5-W3M

389273 5784034 Historic homestead; oral tradition indicates an infant burial at this location.

HRIA prior to disturbance by development, remote sensing to locate the burial is recommended as well.

Battleford - Saskatoon Trail

n/a 16-37-6-W3M Historic maps indicate a possibility for historic trail remnants in uncultivated wetland margins within this section

HRIA of uncultivated wetland margins prior to disturbance by development.

None FbNq-1 27-37-6-W3M (provenienced to section only)

A single Scotsbluff (8800 years BP) was found by a landowner somewhere within the section. The point itself is still with the collector; but its existence creates a high archaeological potential for the whole section because of the possibility that the site it came from is somewhere in the section.

HRIA prior to disturbance by development.

Blue Lettuce Site

FbNq-2 NE 20-37-05-W3M

385349 5784321 Small scatter of stone tools indicative of potential for intact archaeological sites in the area.

HRIA prior to disturbance by development.

Agriplace Site FbNq-3 SE 20-37-5-W3M

385549 5783320 Small scatter of stone tools indicative of potential for intact archaeological sites in the area.

HRIA prior to disturbance by development.

Site #1 FbNq-5 SE 22-37-06-W3M

378749 5783621 Scatter of McKean/Pelican Lake (about 4100-1850 years BP) artifacts including a precontact copper tool, also a historic gunflint.

HRIA prior to disturbance by development.

Site #2 FbNq-6 NE 22-37-06-W3M

378949 5784921 Scatter of Pelican Lake (3300 -1850 years BP) stone tools.

HRIA prior to disturbance by development.

Site #3 FbNq-7 NW 22-37-06-W3M

377949 5784721 Scatter of stone tools. HRIA prior to disturbance by development.

Page 43: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RecommenSeptember

sch w:\active\11

7.0 R

This sectheritage overview

As notedindustriadisturbanarea havnatural athese are

Section 7boundariSection 7

7.1 N

7.1.1 N

Natural awetland lW3M), aconsidereprovide tstormwatarea.

It wa nwo

HthredC

NORTHWESndations r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Recomm

tion providesresources, t

w of natural a

d previously, l and commences. The Nving high potreas outside

e small, isola

7.1 provideses. Addition

7.3.

NATURAL

Natural Are

areas within locations (rend wetlandsed having lohe region wter managem

is recommewithin any sto

state as posaturalized w

wetlands 516pportunities

However, all he restrictionecommendeetract large

City.

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

endation

s recommenthe North Swand historic a

much of theercial develo

North Swale, ential for pro

e of the Nortated or locat

recommendnally, all reco

AREAS O

as – West P

the westernefer to Figures 5160, 5161ow disturbanith importantment plan th

ended that wormwater massible. For e

wetland storm60, 5161, 516

for planners

these wetlanns set forth ined that they b

birds, and a

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

s

ndations for twale, and forareas of inte

e North/Nortopments, tradiscussed s

otection andth Swale bouted in close

dations for thommendatio

UTSIDE OF

Portion

portion of the 4). Of the , 5162, and ce (refer to t hydrologic

hat incorpora

wetlands 509anagement pexample, the

mwater mana62, and 516s to integrate

nds are locan the Saskabe used for oa design, tha

CREENING

the importanr future stud

erest.

hwest studyansportation separately in possible re

undaries thaproximity to

he natural arons related to

F NORTH S

he study aremany areas5163 (all locFigure 9). Tfunctions an

ates some of

96, 5160, 516plan as locaey could formagement pla3, as their pe them as a

ated within thtoon Airport open water st fits all mun

G STUDY, CI

nt natural areies. Figure

y area has becorridors, a

n Section 7.2creation and

at have consthe airport r

reas outsideo heritage re

SWALE BO

ea are primas, only wetlacated within

The many otnd the potenf the wetland

61, 5162, antions suitablm the basis an. This is pproximity to e

larger natur

he 4 km bufft Zoning Regstorage unle

nicipal specif

ITY OF SAS

eas, known 9 provides a

een disturbend other hum2, is the onlyd interpretiveservation valrelative to th

e of the Nortesources are

OUNDARIE

rily related tnd 5096 (Se NE 24-37-6her wetlands

ntial exists fods within the

nd 5163 be cle for retentifor the deve

particularly theach other pralized storm

fer of the airpgulations, it iess measurefications, is a

SKATOON

and potentiaa general

ed by agriculman y large nature use. Thereue, howevere North Swa

h Swale e discussed

ES

to Class 2 anection 14-376-W3M), ares, however, or developinge developme

considered on in as nat

elopment of ahe case with

provides mwater area.

port. Considis not es are taken approved by

7.1

al

lture,

ral e are r ale.

in

nd 3 -6- do g a

ent

ural a

h

.

dering

to y the

Page 44: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RecommenSeptember

7.2

7.1.2 N

The Nortfor the swstudy are

Natural Arelativelydevelopin

Natural Adisturban

It pn

Natural AcombinatpussytoeClass 4 a(tremblin

It dTvi

7.2 N

7.2.1 I

Transporinterconn5365). Wecologicasurroundthe majo5-W3M eecologicainclude a(5047, 50adjacent Ministry oSaskatoo

NORTHWESndations r 16, 2012

Natural Are

th Swale domwale are discea that were

Areas 5052, y low disturbang roadways

Area 5065 (Nnce.

is recommelan as a siteaturalized w

Area 8307, lotion of aspen

es). In additioand 2 wetlang aspen and

is recommeelineate the

This survey sisit.

NORTH SW

Information

rtation corridnected wetla

Wetland bounal boundary

ding the Nortrity of the No

extends nortal boundary a large area 048, 5049, 5to, the prop

of Highwayson consult w

ST NATURA

as – East P

minates the cussed in Se considered

5053, and 5ance. Howes, these wet

NW 32-37-5

ended that Ne having goowetland plan.

ocated withinn stands, Clon, Natural Ands, respectid cottonwoo

ended that anatural area

should includ

WALE

n Plan

dors and landands (wetlanndaries of thof the North

th Swale, theorth Swale. hward slightof the Northof relatively

5062, 5825, posed corridos and Infrastrwith MHI on t

AL AREA S

Portion

eastern portection 7.2. O‘of interest’

5055 (all locaever, given tlands have l

W3M) is a C

Natural Area od natural qu

n Section 5-ass 2 wetlanAreas 5050 ively, with a ds) that prov

n ecologicala boundariesde an early s

d developmeds 5000, 50e North Swa

h Swale. Duee ecological However, thtly to encomh Swale with

undisturbedand 5826) (For of the perructure (MHtheir plans fo

CREENING

sch

tion of the stOther naturaare discuss

ated within Sheir small silittle opportu

Class 3 seas

5065 be conualities and t

-38-5 W3M, nds, and an and 5944 (lothick periph

vide valuable

l survey be cs and to detespring site vi

ents have se01, 5060, 50

ale are idente to consideboundary cl

he ecologicapass an arein Section 3

d prairie, whiFigures 7 anrimeter highwI), therefore or the perime

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

tudy area anal areas in thsed below an

SW 26-37-5-ize and prox

unity for prote

sonal wetlan

nsidered in athe potential

is a low distS1 rare plan

ocated withinheral band ofe wildlife ha

conducted aermine a poisit, in additio

eparated the061, 5360, 5tified in Figurable develolosely followl boundary o

ea of intact n34-37-5-W3Mich contains nd 9). Howevway proposeit is recomm

eter road, an

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

nd specific rehe eastern pnd displayed

-W3M) are wximity to highection.

nd area havin

a stormwate to be integr

turbance arent species (mn SE 33-37-f willows andbitat.

at these locatential setbaon to the su

e Swale into 5361, 5362, re 7, in addi

opment in thws the wetlanof the swale ative prairie

M extends noseveral Cla

ver, this areaed by the Samended thatnd that the n

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

ecommendaportion of thed on Figure 9

wetlands withhways and

ng relatively

er managemrated into a

ea having a meadow -5-W3M) ared trees

tions to bettack, if warranmmer seaso

several 5363, 5364,tion to the e area

nd boundarywithin SW 2. In additionorthward to

ass 2 wetlanda lies within

askatchewant the City of natural areas

_final.docx

ations e 9.

h

y low

ent

e

er nted. on

, and

y for 2-38-, the

ds , or

n

s

Page 45: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RecommenSeptember

sch w:\active\11

within ansignifican

As showNorth Swchecked

Accordinboundarythe land

a. a

b. wo

c. la

d. lathba

7.2.2 W

A 2012 whave hig(Preservewithout d

Table 7.1for each incorpora

GreM5ela

EwWth

1 Where apNorth Swa

NORTHWESndations r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

nd adjacent tnce.

n on Figure wale, therefo

within N 34,

g to The Play (as shown consists of a

ravine, coul

wildlife habitar significant

and that is su

and that abuthat is requireank, or the p

Wetland Ma

wetland funch ecologicale) (Figure 7)

degrading the

1 provides gManagemen

ate them as

Given the ecoecommende

Management000, 5001, ancouraged t

arge birds.

Establish a mwetlands. OnW3M bordershese location

pplicable, the

ale.

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

to that road c

7, land acceore the ecolo, NW, and W

anning and Din Figure 7)

all of the follo

lee, swamp,

at or areas thnatural featu

ubject to floo

ts the bed aed for the puprotection of

anagement

tional asses value and r). The othereir existing f

eneric manant Class; it ispossible. Sp

ological and ed that wetlat Class of Maand 5365 falthat they be

minimum 20 me exception

s the highwans.

Northeast Swa

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

corridor be i

ess permissiogical boundW-21-35-37-5

Developmen) meets the rowing:

natural drai

hat are envirures;

oding or is, in

nd shore of urpose of thef the land to

Class Strat

ssment identrepresent wer wetlands afunctions an

agement stras recommenpecific recom

hydrologicands located anage 1 (50ll within the 4rehabilitated

m buffer aroto this is wh

ay/road; it is

ale Developm

CREENING

dentified to

on was not gary shown o5-W3M to ve

nt Act, the swrequirements

inage course

ronmentally

n the opinion

any lake, rive prevention be subdivide

egies

tified that weetlands to bere identified d values (Ma

ategies and nded that themmendations

al significancoutside the 61, 5360, an4 km buffer od, so as to n

ound the ecohere the econot necessa

ent Guidelines

G STUDY, CI

MHI as area

granted for ton Figure 7 werify its accu

wale and lans of an Envi

e or creek be

sensitive, or

n of the app

ver, stream oof pollution,

ed against fl

etlands 5060e managed tas wetlands

anage 1) (F

stormwater e City reviews for the Nor

ce of the Nor4 km airport

nd 5362) be of the airporot encourag

ological bounological bounary to buffer

s (Stantec 201

ITY OF SAS

as having ec

the entire bowould need uracy.

nd within the ronmental R

ed;

r contain his

roving autho

or other bod, the preservlooding.

0, 5361, 536to preserve ts that shouldigure 7).

treatment rew these straterth Swale inc

rth Swale, it t buffer zonerehabilitated

rt and thus itge use by ge

ndary of the ndary within the ecologic

12) were adap

SKATOON

cological

oundary of thto be field

ecological Reserve in th

storical featu

ority, unstab

y of water avation of the

3, and 5364these valuesd be maintai

ecommendaegies and clude1:

is e with a d. Wetlandst is not

eese and oth

North SwaleSection 24-

cal boundary

ted to apply to

7.3

he

hat

res

le; or

nd

4 s ned

ations

s

her

e 37-5-y at

o the

Page 46: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RecommenSeptember

7.4

Aeaex

S

Epinveseaf

Ein

Mrest“Mfow

WS

In order tpost conspracticesfor each,BMPs arguides d

MP

PS(M

NORTHWESndations r 16, 2012

A 20 m buffercological bodditional uplxtra buffer fo

Seed any dis

Establish a feroducing an

nto the buffeehicles, etc.erious detrimffecting wild

Enforce land ndustrial and

Maintain the “ecommendetormwater mManage 1” worebays or re

within the eco

With the exceSection 7.2.2

to prevent thstruction of a

s (BMPs) be the pollutane based on uring constr

Minnesota UPractices for

Protecting WaStorm Water Minnesota P

ST NATURA

r is recommeoundary of thland buffer isor the mainte

turbed lands

ence betwee“ecological

r by non-com). Encroach

mental impaclife habitat, w

use within thd commercia

“Preserve” wed that the “Mmanagementwetland couldetention ponological boun

eption of sto, no other la

he degradatia stormwateimplemente

nts that are cthe followinguction and m

Urban Small r Cold Clima

Water Quality Runoff from

Pollution Con

AL AREA S

ended, rathehe swale is los recommenenance of w

s within the 2

en the outer buffer zone”

mpatible acthment by comct upon the water quality

he ecologicaal land uses

wetlands in aManage 1” wt plan created be used fo

nds located bndary).

rmwater maand uses sho

on of wetlaner managemed. Appendixcontrolled, ag two docummaintenance

Sites BMP ates (Barr E

in Urban Arm Urban, Subntrol Agency

CREENING

sch

er than a 15 ocated at thended for the wildlife habita

20 m buffer

edge of the ”. This zoneivities (e.g., mmercial annatural vegey, and the na

al buffer zonshould not b

a natural stawetlands be ued for the areor the develobeyond the N

nagement aould be allow

nd functions ent system, x G providesand some gements, whiche of any pote

Manual – Sngineering C

reas – Best Mburban, and , 2000). 

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

m buffer, ase wetland boprotection o

at is not requ

using specie

buffer and ae is requiredstorage of m

nd industrial etation bordeatural functio

ne. Activitiesbe allowed to

ate. To accoused for a mea. For examopment of foNorth Swale

activities andwed within th

and valuesit is importa

s a list of BMeneral constrh are recommential stormw

Stormwater BCompany, 2

ManagemenDeveloping

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

s the majoritoundary andof water qualuired.

es native to

any adjacent to reduce e

materials, paland uses wering the Swons of the w

s associatedo spill into th

omplish this more direct limple, lands

orebays, or ae boundary (t

d developmehe ecologica

during the cant that best MPs and outlruction requimended to bwater manag

Best Manag2001).

nt Practices fAreas of Mi

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

ty of the d therefore thlity. Howeve

the area.

t land use, encroachmenarking of will have a wale, therebywetlands.

d with adjacehe zone.

it is nkage to anadjacent to

as connectiothis could oc

ents discusseal buffer zone

construction managemeines the benirements. Th

be used as gement syste

gement

for Dealing winnesota

_final.docx

he er, an

nt

y also

ent

y the

ons to ccur

ed in e.

ad nt nefits he

em:

with

Page 47: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY, CITY OF SASKATOON Recommendations September 16, 2012

sch w:\active\113253776\esm\report\final\53776_n_nw_nat_screen_final.docx 7.5

Table 7.1: Management Class Strategies and Recommendations

Management

Class Management Strategy Stormwater Treatment Buffer Hydrologic Guidelines1

Preserve

Maintain wetland and existing functions,

values and wildlife habitat. Active

management may be required to protect

unique features. Strict avoidance

standards should be applied and

conservation easements may be

appropriate.

Avoid conveyed flows where prudent and

feasible. Upstream sediment and nutrient

pretreatment is required to maintain

background loading rates. Maintain

existing hydrology and divert increased

flows. Avoid concentrating flows.

≥15 m for water quality

and ≥30 m for

wildlife habitat.2

Bounce (10 yr): Existing Inundation (1 & 2 yr): Existing (10 yr): Existing Runout Control:3 No Change Maintain existing hydrology. Encourage infiltration and reduced impervious BMPs. Conduct water budget analysis.

Manage 1 Maintain wetland without degrading existing

functions, values and wildlife habitat.

Pretreat conveyed flows to maintain

background loading rates. 10-15 m

Bounce (10 yr): Existing + 0.15 m Inundation (1 & 2 yr): Existing plus 1 day (10 yr): Existing + 7 days Runout Control:2 No Change Maintain existing hydrology. Encourage infiltration and reduced impervious BMPs.

Manage 2

Maintain wetland footprint. Improve wetland

biological and plant community

diversity/integrity or enhance other

functions if possible.

Pretreat all conveyed discharges to

remove all heavy particles and maximize

removal of fine grained sediment prior to

discharging to the wetland.

7.5-10 m

Bounce (10 yr): Existing + 0.3 m Inundation (1& 2 yr): Existing plus 2 days (10 yr): Existing + 14 days Runout Control: 2 0 to 0.3 m above existing runout

(Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 2012) 1 Bounce: difference between the peak flood elevation and the normal wetland elevation. Inundation Period: time that flood waters are temporarily stored in the wetland that exceed the normal wetland elevation Runout control: elevation of the outlet Water budget: a water balance calculation, which accounts for the inflow and outflow of water to and from the habitat area over a certain period, while at the same time,

considering the habitat’s water demand. Water Balance = P + Si – Go – ET (Where: P = precipitation, Si = surface inflow, Go = loss/outflow, and ET = evapotranspiration)

Page 48: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RecommenSeptember

sch w:\active\11

7.2.3 L

The neducdistanbicyctrail sis confuturecomp

7.3 A

As noted5365) anbuffer of Zoning Ropen watmunicipa

7.4 H

7.4.1 P

As discusquarter srepresen

7.4.2 C

At this scsome bacontent a

NORTHWESndations r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Linkage Op

natural qualiation amenitnce through

cle path systesystem beingnsidering coe opportunitiplex.

It is recomleast one between t

It is recomareas at rthe “Prese

Interpretivwetlands at location

AIRPORT Z

d previously, nd a large po

the SaskatoRegulations, ter storage,

al specificatio

HERITAGE

Potential He

ssed in Sectsections idennted in pink o

Caswell Ho

creening stagsic site mapand archaeo

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

pportunities

ties of the Nty for the Nothe area, it

em along bog developednnecting to ies to link bo

mmended thside of the N

the ecologic

mmended thregular interverve” wetlan

ve signage is(wildlife habns providing

ZONING R

the southerortion of the oon airport. Cit is not recounless meaons, is appro

E RESOUR

eritage Res

tion 6.2, it isntified in Tabon Figures 8

mestead Si

ge, archaeopping, but noological signi

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

North Swale aorth/Northweprovides an

oth sides. T along Wanuthe Trans C

oth cities with

at a pedestrNorth Swale

cal buffer and

at the pathwvals, but pre

nds.

s recommenbitat, surface bird viewing

ESTRICTIO

rn extent of tsouthern exConsidering ommended tsures are taoved by the

RCES

ource Sens

recommendble 6.1 prior 8 and 9.

te

logists wereot perform anficance. In t

CREENING

also have poest region. A opportunity

This could aluskewin Roaanada trail sh a commute

rian/bicycle pe. This 3m wd the outer f

way system ceferably near

nded, illustrae hydrology, g opportuniti

ONS

the North Swtent of the sthe restrictio

that wetlandaken to detraCity.

sitive Lands

ded that an Hto impact by

e only able tony detailed ehe event tha

G STUDY, CI

otential to beAs the swaley to develop low connectad. Additionsystem nearer trail syste

pathway syswide pathwafence.

connect to thr the “Manag

ating the ecoetc.). Theseies.

wale (naturastudy area arons set forths within 4 km

act large bird

s

HRIA be cony developme

o confirm theexamination at developme

ITY OF SAS

e used as a e extends fora commutertion to the Trnally, the Citr Wanuskewem along a n

stem be consay would be

he surroundge 1” wetlan

ological impoe sign locatio

l areas 5000re located wh in the Saskm of the airpds, and a des

nducted withent. These q

e presence oto determineent encroac

SKATOON

recreation ar a considerar pedestrian rans Canadaty of Martens

win, providingnatural wetla

sidered for adeveloped

ing developmnds, rather th

ortance of ons could als

0, 5001, andwithin the 4 kkatoon Airpoport be used sign, that fits

hin the 23 quarters are

of the site ane the site’s

ches on this s

7.6

and able and

a sville g and

at

ment han

so be

d m

ort for s all

also

nd do

site,

Page 49: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RecommenSeptember

sch w:\active\11

it is recomsignificanestablishsignificanavoid, if a

7.4.3 V

At this scnot perfoavoidancan HRIA geophyswith this possibilitexact locthe best establish

It should and in faof the stu

7.4.4 B

At this scno land aof some whowevercase any

7.5 F

As noted

C

AnW

C5

NORTHWESndations r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

mmended thnt buried arch the nature ance. This woany.

Valley Cres

creening stagorm any detace by developrior to anyical survey thomestead.y of a small

cation of the evidence tha

hing a genera

be noted thct the major

udy area for

Battleford -

creening stagaccess permwetlands. A, an HRIA isy intact remn

FURTHER

d above, ther

Completion o

An ecologicaatural area w

W3M (vicinity

Confirm the e-W3M (could

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

hat an HRIA chaeological and content

ould then est

t Homestea

ge, archaeoailed examinopment could impact by do determine In this instaunmarked gburial givenat can be obal setback a

at the site exrity of the sitethis screeni

Saskatoon

ge, archaeomission. How

ny remnantss recommendnants of the t

INVESTIG

re are some

of HRIAs prio

l study havinwithin Sectioy of Natural A

ecological bod not be surv

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

be conductedeposits. A of archaeol

tablish herita

ad Site

logists wereation to deted not be detedevelopmente if there are ance, a geopgrave in the a the total are

btained regaround the ar

xists right one extends nong.

n Trail

logists werewever, much s of the trail ded prior to trail exist the

ATIONS

recommend

or to develop

ng a broaderon 5-38-5 WAreas 5050

oundary of thveyed in the

CREENING

ed, includingdetailed maogical deposage boundar

e only able toermine site eermined. Tht. The HRIA significant i

physical survarea, howevea of the siterding the burea.

n the east-worth into the

e not able to of the area that were in developmenere.

ded future in

pment at the

r time span i3M (vicinity and 5944).

he North Swe field due to

G STUDY, CI

g detailed mapping and tsits on the sries that futu

o confirm theextents. For is site shoulshould incluntact archaevey is recomver it may bee. Therefore

urial and the

west quarter sNW of 23-3

confirm the has been cucultivation w

nt for the unc

nvestigations

e locations id

in which to cof Natural A

wale within No no land acc

ITY OF SAS

apping and testing progrsite and asseure developm

e presence othis reason,d be examinude test excaeological rem

mmended owe difficult to pe, oral traditio

City may wi

section line 37-5-W3M, w

presence ofultivated, witwill have beecultivated we

s. These are

dentified in S

collect informArea 8307) a

N 34, NW, ancess permis

SKATOON

testing for ram would ess their ment should

of the site, b, boundariesned in detail avations andmains assocwing to the pinpoint the on may becoish to consid

of Section 2which is not p

f the trail duth the excepen destroyedetland marg

e:

Section 7.2.

mation on theand SE 33-37

nd W-21-35-sion).

7.7

but s for

with d a

ciated

ome der

23 part

e to tion d; ins in

e 7-5-

-37-

Page 50: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/RecommenSeptember

7.8

Dlo

Cstnre

Additionaunknownoutside tmanagem

NORTHWESndations r 16, 2012

Develop a resocated >4 km

Consult with ttormwater mumber of weetain some o

ally, the Cityn at this timehe North Swment plans.

ST NATURA

storation plam from the a

the Saskatomanagementetlands locatof the natura

of Saskatooe, but there mwale bounda

AL AREA S

an for the Mairport (5061

on Airport At ponds located within th

al wetlands w

on is develomay be a neery and to inc

CREENING

sch

anage 1 wet, 5360, and

Authority on ated within the 4 km airpo

within the fut

ping a Wetlaed to complecorporate tho

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

lands within5362).

acceptable dhe 4 km airpoort buffer, theture develop

and Policy. ete functionaose findings

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

the North S

designs for nort buffer. Dere is an op

pment plans.

The implicatal assessme

s into future s

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

Swale that ar

naturalized ue to the larportunity to .

tions of this ents for wetlastormwater

_final.docx

re

rge

are ands

Page 51: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/ReferencesSeptember

sch w:\active\11

8.0 R

Acton, Dby S.

Acton, DExten

Acton, DPlain

AMEC (AMarqSask

ArsenaulproteEnvir

Barr EngBest Acce

City of SaPlan

EnvironmAgricOttaw

Environmhttp:/

Fennessasses

Governm

Governm

Governm

Governm

NORTHWESs r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

Referenc

. 1977. Lan Rowe. Uni

.F. and J.G.nsion Divisio

.F., G.A. Pas Research

AMEC Earthquis/Silverwokatoon.

lt, A.A. 2009ection of vertronment. Lan

gineering CoManagemenssed online:

askatoon. 20Bylaw, 2010

ment Canadaculture. The Cwa, ON. 16 p

ment Canada//climate.wea

y, M.S., A.Dssing the ec

ment of Cana

ment of Cana

ment of Cana

ment of Cana

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

ces

ndscapes of versity of Sa

Ellis. 1978. on, Universit

dbury, C.T. Center, Reg

& Environmood industria

9. Disturbanctebrate specnds Branch

mpany. 200nt Practices : http://www.

010. The Co0. Bylaw No.

a. 1972. TheCanada Lanpp.

a. 2012. Naatheroffice.g

D. Jacobs ancological con

ada. 1991. T

ada. 1994. M

ada. 1999. C

ada. 2002. S

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

Southern Saaskatchewan

Soils of the y of Saskatc

Stushnoff. 1gina, SK.

mental Limiteal area Sask

ce impact thrcies of conce– Fish and W

1. Minnesotfor Cold Clim

.metrocounc

orman Park –. 8844.

e Canada Land Inventory

tional Climagc.ca/climate

d M.E. Kentndition of we

The Federal

Migratory Bir

Canadian En

Species at R

CREENING

askatchewann, Saskatoon

Saskatoon chewan, Sas

998. The Ec

ed). 2002. Ekatoon, Sask

resholds: reern in SaskaWildlife Bran

a Urban Smmates. Prepcil.org/enviro

– Saskatoon

and InventoryReport No.

ate Data andeData/canad

tula. 2007. Atlands. Wetl

Policy on W

rds Convent

nvironmenta

Risk Act.

G STUDY, CI

n (map) In: Sn.

Map Area 7skatoon, SK

coregions of

Environmentakatchewan.

commendedtchewan. Sa

nch Technica

mall Sites BMpared for theonment/Wate

n Planning D

ry, Soil Capa2. Departme

d Informationda_e.html

An evaluationands, 27(3):

Wetland Cons

tion Act.

al Protection

ITY OF SAS

Saskatchew

73-B Saskatc.

f Saskatchew

al ScreeningPrepared fo

d land use gaskatchewanal Report 20

MP Manual –e Metropolitaer/BMP/man

District Offici

ability Classient of the En

n Archive. A

n of rapid m: 543-560.

servation.

Act.

SKATOON

wan Landsca

chewan.

wan. Canad

g Report r the City of

guidelines forn Ministry of

009-6. 93pp.

– Stormwatean Council. nual.htm.

ial Communi

ification for nvironment.

Accessed onl

ethods for

8.1

pes

a

r f

r

ity

line:

Page 52: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/ReferencesSeptember

8.2

Governm

Governmhttp:/stype

Governm

Governm

Governm

Governm

Governm

Governm

Governm

Governm

GovernmAmen

Governm

Heritage Sens

MinnesotMnRAmnra

MinnesotMinn(betaComp

MinnesotClassindex

MinnesotManaDeve

NORTHWESs r 16, 2012

ment of Cana

ment of Cana//www.registe=species&ln

ment of Cana

ment of Sask

ment of Sask

ment of Sask

ment of Sask

ment of Sask

ment of Sask

ment of Sask

ment of Saskndment Act,

ment of Sask

Resources sitivity. Electr

ta Board of WAM 3.4 (beta

am/index.htm

ta Board of Wesota Routin

a). Accessedprehensive_

ta Board of Wsification Sysx.html

ta Pollution agement Praeloping Area

ST NATURA

ada. 1987. S

ada. 2012. Srelep-sarareng=e&advke

ada. 2012. T

katchewan. 1

katchewan. 1

katchewan. 1

katchewan. 1

katchewan. 2

katchewan. 2

katchewan. 2

katchewan. 22010.

katchewan. 2

Branch, Sasronic Resou

Water and Sa) (access fi

ml

Water and Sne Assessm

d online: http_Guidance_3

Water and Sstem. Acces

Control Ageactices for Ds of Minneso

AL AREA S

Saskatoon A

Species at Riegistry.gc.caeywords=&o

The Fisherie

1978. Provin

1980. Enviro

1995. Saska

1998. Wildlif

2002. Enviro

2005. Saska

2009. Wildlif

2010. The W

2012. Plann

skatchewan rce. Provinc

Soil Resourcle). Accesse

Soil Resourcment Method p://www.bwsr3.4beta_201

Soil Resourcssed online:

ncy. 2000. Pealing with Sota. Accesse

CREENING

sch

irport Zoning

isk Public R/search/advp=2&locid=3

es Act.

ncial Lands A

onmental As

atchewan W

fe Act.

onmental Ma

atchewan W

fe Habitat Pr

Wildlife Habit

ning and Dev

Tourism, Pace of Saskatc

ces. 2010a. Wed online: htt

ces. 2010b. C(MnRAM) Er.state.mn.u0.pdf

ces. 2012. Rhttp://www.b

Protecting WStorm Watered online: ht

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

g Regulation

Registry. AccvSearchResu3&

Act.

ssessment A

Wetland Polic

anagement

Watershed Au

Protection Ac

tat Protectio

velopment A

arks, Culturechewan.

Wetland Funttp://www.bw

ComprehensEvaluating Ws/wetlands/m

ecommendebwsr.state.m

Water Qualityr Runoff fromttp://www.pc

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

ns.

cessed onlinults_e.cfm?

Act.

cy.

and Protecti

uthority Act.

ct.

on (Land Des

Act.

e, and Sport

nctional Asswsr.state.mn

sive GeneraWetland Func

mnram/MnR

ed Wetland Mmn.us/wetlan

y in Urban Am Urban, Suca.state.mn.u

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

ne:

ion Act.

signation)

t. 2012. Heri

essment/ .us/wetlands

al Guidance fction, Versio

RAM%20_

Managemennds/mnram/

Areas – Best uburban, andus/index.php

_final.docx

itage

s/

for on 3.4

nt

d p/

Page 53: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/ReferencesSeptember

sch w:\active\11

watermana

Mitsch, W

Padbury,Servi

RM of Co34 pp

SaskatchReso

Saskatch38-05

Saskatch

SKCDC (Acce

SKCDC (list-F

SKCDC (list-F

Stantec (FactoSask

Stantec (Prepa26pp

Stantec (Plann

Stantec (Prepa

Stewart, GlaciU.S.

NORTHWESs r 16, 2012

3253776\esm\report\f

r/water-typeagement-pra

W.J. and J.G

, G and D. Aces and Sas

orman Park.p.

hewan Energource. Provin

hewan Archi5-W3M. Sas

hewan Archi

(Saskatchewssed online:

(SaskatchewFebruary 201

(SaskatchewFebruary 201

(Stantec Conoria Site for tkatchewan.

(Stantec Conared for the .

(Stantec Conning and Dev

(Stantec Conared for the

R.E. and H.iated Prairie Fish and Wi

ST NATURA

final\53776_n_nw_nat_

s-and-prograactices-manu

G. Gosselink

Acton. 1994skatchewan

1994. Rura

gy and Resonce of Saska

ves Board. 1skatchewan.

ves Board. S

wan Conserv: http://giswe

wan Conserv12. Access o

wan Conserv12. Access o

nsulting Ltd.the Meewas

nsulting Ltd.Community

nsulting Ltd.velopment B

nsulting Ltd.Planning an

A. Kantrud. Region. Re

ildlife Servic

AL AREA S

_screen_final.docx

ams/stormwual.html.

. 2007. Wetl

. EcoregionProperty Ma

al Municipalit

ources. 201atchewan,

1883. Domin

Saskatchew

vation Data eb1.serm.go

vation Data online: http://

vation Data online: http://

). 1998. Hissin Valley Au

). 2006. NoServices De

). 2009. SaBranch, City

). 2012. Nornd Developm

1971. Clasesource Pube. Washing

CREENING

water/stormw

ands 4th Edi

ns of Saskatcanagement.

ty of Corman

2. Geologic

nion Land Su

wan Homeste

Centre). 201ov.sk.ca/wild

Centre). 201/www.biodive

Centre). 201/www.biodive

torical / Archuthority. Heri

orth Industriaepartment, C

askatoon Weof Saskatoo

rtheast Swalment Branch

sification of blication 92, ton, DC.

G STUDY, CI

water-manag

ition. John W

chewan. (M

n Park No. 3

cal Atlas of S

urvey Maps:

ead Index Da

12a. Rare splifelogin/form

12b. Saskatcersity.sk.ca/

12b. Saskatcersity.sk.ca/

haeological itage Permit

al Sector PlaCity Planning

etland Policyon.

le Developm, City of Sas

Natural PonBureau of S

ITY OF SAS

gement/storm

Wiley and So

Map) Minister

344 Official C

Saskatchewa

: 37-05-W3M

atabase. Sa

pecies searcm.asp.

chewan inva/Docs/Invasiv

chewan nox/Docs/Noxiou

Review of tht No. 98-105

an, Natural Ag Branch, C

y Study. Pre

ment Guidelinskatoon.

nds and LakeSport Fisheri

SKATOON

mwater-best-

ons, Inc.

r of Supply a

Community P

an. Electron

M, 37-06-W3

askatchewan

ch function.

asive specieveSpecies.p

xious speciesusWeeds.pd

he Silverwoo5. Saskatoon

Areas Screenity of Saskat

epared for th

nes (2012).

es in the es and Wild

8.3

-

and

Plan.

nic

3M,

n.

es pdf.

s df.

od n,

ning. toon.

e

life,

Page 54: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/ReferencesSeptember

8.4

Transporwww

Walker, EAnthr

NORTHWESs r 16, 2012

rt Canada. T.tc.gc.ca. Ac

E. G. 1983. ropology and

ST NATURA

TP 1247-Aviaccessed on:

Saskatoon Pd Archaeolo

AL AREA S

ation-Land UAugust 17, 2

Perimeter Argy, Universi

CREENING

sch

Use in the Vi2012.

rchaeologicaty of Saskat

G STUDY, CI

w:\active\113253776\

Vicinity of Airp

al Resource tchewan.

ITY OF SAS

\esm\report\final\5377

ports. Availa

Assessmen

SKATOON

6_n_nw_nat_screen_

able at:

nt. Departme

_final.docx

ent of

Page 55: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY City of Saskatoon

FIGURES

Page 56: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

37-05-337-06-3

38-05-338-06-3

1111

1111

14

23

1617

08

14

21 23

03

20

09

29

07

34

12

13

22

28 26

24

26

15

27

09

10

18

03

32

02

10

07

33 35 36

25

19

34

27

01

21

10

06

33

0908

31

10

28

09

04

30

22

16

02

12

0405

35

15

04 03

12

02

13

01

24

06

25

05

36

04

01

03

12

02

08

05

32

01

29

20

17

14

08

15161718

05

13 1314151617

NUNWT

SKAB MB

USA

FIGURE NO.Area

ofInterest

±

Last

Modif

ied: S

ep 11

, 201

2 By:

Hgers

tmar

PREPARED FOR:

113253776

City of Saskatoon North/NorthwestNatural Area Screening

Study Area, Property Access, and Natural Areas

Acknowledgements: Original Drawing by Stantec.Imagery: 2009 60cm SGIC Imagery

Study_AreaProperty access grantedWetland field-checkedWetland not field-checkedTreestand field-checkedTreestand not field-checkedWatercourse

PREPARED BY

1:50,000Scale:

1

Page 57: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

37-05-337-06-3

38-05-338-06-3

1111

1111

14

23

1617

08

14

21 23

03

20

09

29

07

34

12

13

22

28 26

24

26

15

27

09

10

18

03

32

02

10

07

33 35 36

25

19

34

27

01

21

10

06

33

0908

31

10

28

09

04

30

22

16

02

12

0405

35

15

04

08

03

05

02

32

01

29

06

20

05

17

04

08

03 0205

12

13

24

25

36

14

01

15

12

01

1617181314151613

17

4(10)M

3(10)M

3(10)M

4(7)MP(3)M 4(10)MN

3(10)M

5(6)M 4(4)MP

3(10)M

4(10)M

3(6)M 4(4)M

3(8)M 2(2)C

3(10)M

5(10)WN

3(9)M 4(1)E

3(10)M 6(10)TE

5(10)NW

3(10)M

4(10)M

6(10)TE

NUNWT

SKAB MB

USA

FIGURE NO.Area

ofInterest

±

Last

Modif

ied: S

ep 11

, 201

2 By:

Hgers

tmar

PREPARED FOR:

113253776

City of Saskatoon North/NorthwestNatural Area Screening

Soil Capability for Agriculture

Acknowledgements: Original Drawing by Stantec.Imagery: 2009 60cm SGIC Imagery

Soil Capability ClassClass 3Class 4Class 5Class 6Study_AreaWatercourseWaterbody

PREPARED BY

1:50,000Scale:

Example: 3(9)M 4(1)E This means that 90% of this soilpolygon is Class 3 due to a slight mositure limitation and 10% of the soil area is Class 4 due to an erosion limitation. * Refer to Appendix A for a description of capability classes and subclasses.

2

Page 58: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

37-05-337-06-3

38-05-338-06-3

1111

1111

14

23

1617

08

14

21 23

03

20

09

29

07

34

12

13

22

28 26

24

26

15

27

09

18

03

32

02

10

07

33 35 36

25

19

34

27

01

21

10

06

33

08

31

10

28

09

04

30

22

16

02

12

0405

35

04

15

03

10

02

09

01 06 05 04 03 02

12

13

24

25

36

01

12

01

05

08

32

29

20

17

08

05

1415 1316171813

NUNWT

SKAB MB

USA

FIGURE NO.Area

ofInterest

±

Last

Modif

ied: S

ep 11

, 201

2 By:

Hgers

tmar

PREPARED FOR:

113253776

City of Saskatoon North/NorthwestNatural Area Screening

Natural AreaInventory

Acknowledgements: Original Drawing by Stantec.Imagery: 2009 60cm SGIC Imagery

Natural AreasClass 2- TemporaryClass 3- SeasonalClass 4- Semi-permanentClass 5- PermanentTree standStudy_AreaWatercourse

PREPARED BY

1:50,000Scale:

3

See Figure 4 and Figure 5 for Natural Area ID numbers.

Page 59: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

5540

5000

5505

5614

5031

5162

5144

7448

5677

5684

5998

5533

5619 5157

5901

7459

5096

5565

5081

5587

7446

8516

56795107

5204

5001

5206

5161

5003

5083

55345583

5065

5163

5071

5004

50377447

5889

5513

5536

5953

5671

5784

7444

5560

5304

5642

8509

5091

5129

5552

5569

7489

5113

5657

7445

55325067

5159

5089

8520

51405150

5558

5154

7446

5506

5517

51035541

5663

8512

5934

5090

5211

5033

5608 5160

5567

5102

5631

5888

51955184

7467

5640

5186

5940

5648

5566

5675

7452

5621

5746

5185

5607

5635

5543

8510

5022

8517

5367

5134

51095574

8522

5104

5066

5084

5645

5919

8515

5214

5568

5012

5603

5164

5616

5519

5166

5750

5623

8518

5745

5646

5202

5538

5592

5509

5885

74545188

8514

5661

5512

5956

5917

5588

5225

7468

5678

5149

5547

5887

8523

5611

5088

5573

5542

5634

5931

5753

5602

510555895562

5755

5011

5093

5667

5783

5954

5659

5747

5017

74915656

8519

5580

5545

5961

5597

5190

5406

8509

5085

5544

5617

5773

5106

55505075

5647

5770

5629

5921

5302

8507

5683

5078

5095

5187

5518

8010

8513

5196

5013

5673

5143

53057493

5554

7456

5024

56515152

5303

5208

5680

8521

5561

5676

5156

56645706

5935

5596

5110

5307

5136

5555

5193

59555172

5097

5133

5194

5122

5564

5197

5229

5575

5700

5785

5025

5191

5508

5681

5147

5500

5960

5026

5804

5514

5205

5155

5948

5618

5884

5590

8511

5502

5015

5120

5200

5720

5930

5300

5600

8505

5021

5577

5798

5578

5539

5715

5630

5548

5301

5094

5922

5178

7449

5409

5222

51985189

7471

59585209

5537

5087

5210

5127

56708508

5633

5799

5643

5939

5135

55985591

5203

5068

5181

5769

5703

5757

5942

7450

5650

5722

8100

5131

7472

8506

5576

5116

5076

5174

5658

5752

5535

5649

7494

5201

5937

5504

5510

5079

5572

7465

5175

5507

5153

5615

5563

5702

5760

5080

5959

5215

5933

5918

5183

5551

5626

5674

5213

5622

5652

5216

5672

5400

5797

7466

5557

5082

5595

5920

5793

5691

5176

5605

5403

5609

5909

5553

5111

5570

5511

5903

5637

5662

5118

5925

5636

8306

5077

5696

5584

5582 5029

7475

5123

5938

5754

5932

5632

7481

5610

5180

5721

5032

5142

5926

5641

5638

5108

5613

5786

5777

5952

5902

8087

5593

5653 5943 5165

5655

5654

5606

51775226

5601

5501

7497

5782

59165556

7463

5192

5971

5710

5989

5788

5594

5006

5571

7479

5751

5660

5924

7495

5790

5408

5405

5145

5997

5148

5682

5768

5579

7500

57895791

5410

5503

7490

5936

5014

5546

5886

8300

5756

5707

5581

5780

7498

5023

5779

5625

5698

5912

5170

5549

5604

5965

5069

5586

5220

7484

5124

5126

5697

5019

7478

5151

5970

5119

5914

5620

5913

5699

5794

5182

5759

5559 5915

5766

5669

5693

5228

5128

5778

5402

5949

5929

5179

7451

56685666

5158

5727

74695146

5112

7458

5132

5796

5771

5923

5792

5585

5967

5781

5020

5086

5207

5968

5966

5704

7462

5404

5224

5072

5758

5969

5708

5725

5219

5726

5217

5904

5624

59285717

7470

5705

5765

56397501

5787

5701

5199

5599

5030

5713

5227

5407

5716

5776

5692

50705117

5927

5121

5714

5962

5772

5125

5694

7476

5665

5709

5718

5212

5223

5719

5221 5218

37-06-337-05-3

38-06-3 38-05-3

1614

2123

34

13

22

2826

24

15

27

18

3335

36

25

19

31

30

17

20

29

32

09

06

1110

0102

12

03

32

07

04

29

05

20

17

0808

05

NUNWT

SKAB MB

USA

FIGURE NO.Area

ofInterest

±

Last

Modif

ied: S

ep 11

, 201

2 By:

Hgers

tmar

PREPARED FOR:

113253776

City of Saskatoon North/NorthwestNatural Area Screening

Natural Area InventoryWest Portion

Acknowledgements: Original Drawing by Stantec.Imagery: 2009 60cm SGIC Imagery

Natural AreasClass 2- TemporaryClass 3- SeasonalClass 4- Semi-permanentClass 5- PermanentTree standStudy_AreaWatercourse

PREPARED BY

1:30,000Scale:

4

Page 60: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

5060

5360

5365

5361

5362

5061

5000

5364

5359

5031

5162

5413

7448

5826

5684

5998

5034

5901

7459

7446

5363

5001

5003

8501

5049

8525

5990

8504

5829

5062

5065

5163

5050

5004

50377447

5889

8307

5314

8301

5784

7444

5944

5856

5905

53495748

7489

5859

7445

8302

5067

8308

7446

5358

5033

5520

5346

5817

5888

7467

5347

5527

7452

57465353

50228522

5870

5066

5012

5164

5519

5354

8502

5827

5750

5059

5745

7454

5882

5873

5866

59835345

7468

5907

5999

8523

8524

5054

5521

5825

5812

5753

5976

5878

5832

5755

5011

5867

5783

5747

5017

7491

5047

5312

5773

5770 5320

5795

5830

5683

5874

53057493

5804

5039

5336

5311

5851

7456

5996

5863

5805

5024

8524

5706

5057

5348

5849

5307

5993

5763

5811

5972

7443

5880

5869

5812

58385700

5341

5785

5833

5025

58685681 5026

8503

5875

5876

54165865

5015 5840

5720

5021

5340

5798

5814

5715

5975

50387449

5332

5042

5052

7471

5045

5862

5048

5982

5799

5330

5803

5525

5806

5068

5769

5703

5322

5757

5831

5908

5046

5906

7450

5842

5722

5356

7442

5355

5531

5823

7472

5174

5752

7494

5529

7465

56275331

5702

5760

5528

5861

5854

5308

5063

5522

5342

5415

5686

5053

5979

5860

5843

5834

53275762

5526

5797

7466

5945

5802

5793

5691

583659095055

5339

5334

5864

5328

5352

5985

5417

5877

5628

5822

8306

5696

5749

5029

7475

5754

7481

5883

5721

5032

5821

5910

5879

8304

5685

5524

5855

5786

5777

5986

58075980

5809

5337

5978

5165

5321

5414

5036

5333

5872

7432

5530

7497

5782

7463

8303

5761

5710

5984

7440

5788

53245310

5006

7479

5751

5801

5800

5816

7495

5790

5845

5690

5411

5841

5325

7438

5974

5881

5682

5768

5689

5789

5764

5791

5410

5828

7490

5014

5357

5756

5858

5707

5780

7498

5023

8305

5779

5323

5698

5069

7484

5837

5313

5697

5019

7478

5853

5844

5857

5699

5794 5847

5759

5766

5994

5693

5778 5949

7451

5995

5727

7469

7458

5796

7437

5771

5792

5781

5020

5850

5852

5704

7462

5810

59885758

5708

5688

5725

5687

5219

5726

5217

5041

5523

5835

5335

5815

5035

5412

5717

7470

5977

7439

5705

5044

5765

5839

5973

53265343

5040

5787

5701

5813

5030

5043

5713

5329

5716

5776

5871

5692

5714

5846

5366

5772

5694

7476

5351

5808

5848

5709

5718

5719

5218

37-05-3

38-05-3

37-04-3

2320

29

26

03

32

19

34

27

21

06

3331

28

04

30

22

02

05

35

24

25

36

01

18 17 16 15 14 13

11 1210090807

01

36

25

12

24

13 NUNWT

SKAB MB

USA

FIGURE NO.Area

ofInterest

±

Last

Modif

ied: S

ep 11

, 201

2 By:

Hgers

tmar

PREPARED FOR:

113253776

City of Saskatoon North/NorthwestNatural Area Screening

Natural Area InventoryEast Portion

Acknowledgements: Original Drawing by Stantec.Imagery: 2009 60cm SGIC Imagery

Natural AreasClass 2- TemporaryClass 3- SeasonalClass 4- Semi-permanentClass 5- PermanentTree standStudy_AreaWatercourse

PREPARED BY

1:30,000Scale:

5

Page 61: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

#*

#*

#*

#*Bobolink (S5B- Threatened)

Sprague's Pipit (S3B-Threatened)

Sprague's Pipit (S3B-Threatened)

Barn Swallow (S5B S5M- Threatened)

meadow pussytoes (S1)

meadow pussytoes (S1)

narrow leaved cattail (S1?)

narrow leaved cattail (S1?)

Engelmann' s spikerush (S2)

northern blue-eyed grass (S3?)

Engelmann' s spikerush-1966 (S2)

narrow leaved water plantain (S3)

37-05-337-06-3

38-05-338-06-3

1111

1111

14

23

1617

08

14

2123

03

20

09

29

07

34

12

13

22

28 26

24

26

15

27

09

10

18

03

32

02

10

07

33 35 36

25

19

34

27

01

21

10

06

33

0908

31

10

28

09

04

30

22

16

02

12

0405

35

15

04

08

03

05

02

32

01

29

06

20

05

17

04

08

03 0205

12

13

24

25

36

14

01

15

12

01

1617181314151613

17

NUNWT

SKAB MB

USA

FIGURE NO.Area

ofInterest

±

Last

Modif

ied: S

ep 11

, 201

2 By:

Hgers

tmar

PREPARED FOR:

113253776

City of Saskatoon North/NorthwestNatural Area Screening

Provincially and/or Federally Tracked Species

Acknowledgements: Original Drawing by Stantec.Imagery: 2009 60cm SGIC Imagery

Tracked Wildlife#* Barn Swallow (S5B S5M- Threatened)#* Bobolink (S5B- Threatened)#* Sprague's Pipit (S3B-Threatened)

Tracked PlantsEngelmann' s spikerush (S2)

Engelmann' s spikerush-1966 (S2)

meadow pussytoes (S1)

narrow leaved cattail (S1?)

narrow leaved water plantain (S3)

northern blue-eyed grass (S3?)Study_Area

PREPARED BY

1:50,000Scale:

6

Page 62: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

5060

5360

5365

5361

5362

5061

5000

5364

5363

5001NUNWT

SKAB MB

USA

FIGURE NO.Area

ofInterest

±

Last

Modif

ied: S

ep 11

, 201

2 By:

Hgers

tmar

PREPARED FOR:

113253776

City of Saskatoon North/NorthwestNatural Area Screening

North Swale Wetland Management Classes and Information Plan

Acknowledgements: Original Drawing by Stantec.Imagery: 2009 60cm SGIC Imagery

Wetland Management ClassesPreserveManage 1Ecological boundaryProperty access grantedStudy_AreaWatercourse

PREPARED BY

1:30,000Scale:

*Management Classes are basedon the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (MnRAM) for evaluating wetland functions (Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, 2010a)

7

Page 63: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

!(

!(

!(!(!(!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(FbNp-3

FbNp-1

FbNp76

FbNp-9

FbNp-8FbNp-7

FbNp-2

FbNp-4

FaNp-7

FbNq-3

FbNq-2

FbNq-6

FbNq-5

FbNq-7

FbNp-82

FbNp-27FbNp-24FbNp-26

FaNp-23

FbNp-72FbNp-73

FaNp-22

FbNp-78

FbNp-35

FbNp-23

FaNp-27

FbNp-5 FbNp-20

Fbnp-74

FbNp-16FbNp-17

FbNp-25

FbNp-19FbNp-18

FbNp-15

FbNp-22

FbNp-21

FbNp-14FbNp-13

FbNp-10FbNp-34

Valley Crest Homestead

FbNq-8 (Caswell Homestead)

Moosomin Land Claim

Soto Land Claim

Moosomin Land Claim

FbNq-1

FbNp-70

FaNp-4

FbNp-6

37-05-337-06-3

38-05-338-06-3

1111

1111

14

23

1617

08

14

21 23

03

20

09

29

07

34

12

13

22

28 26

24

26

15

27

09

10

18

03

32

02

10

07

33 35 36

25

19

34

27

01

21

10

06

33

0908

31

10

28

09

04

30

22

16

02

12

0405

35

15

04 03 02 01 06 05 04 03

12

02

13

24

25

36

01

12

08

05

01

32

29

20

17

08

05

1415161718 131314151617

Battleford - Saskatoon Trail 1901

Red Pheasant Reserve

NUNWT

SKAB MB

USA

FIGURE NO.Area

ofInterest

±

Last

Modif

ied: S

ep 11

, 201

2 By:

Hgers

tmar

PREPARED FOR:

113253776

City of Saskatoon North/NorthwestNatural Area Screening

Heritage Screening

Acknowledgements: Original Drawing by Stantec.Imagery: 2009 60cm SGIC Imagery

Heritage SensitivityNoYesDisturbed

!( Archeological SiteArcheological Site- Section Land Claims and ReservesBattleford- Saskatoon TrailStudy_AreaRailwayContoursRoadsParks

PREPARED BY

1:50,000Scale:

8

Page 64: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

#*

#*

#*

#*

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(!(!(!(

5060

5360

5361

5365

5362

5061

5000

5364

5162

5826

5096

5062

5065

5163

5050

5363

8307

5001

5944

5161

5160

5047

50525053

50495825

5048

5055

37-05-337-06-3

38-05-338-06-3

36-06-3 36-05-3

1111

1111

03

14

23

1617

08

03

14

21

06

23

03

04

20

09

29

05

07

02 01

34

12

02

13

22

28 26

24

26

15

27

09

18

03

32

02

10

07

33 35 36

25

04

19

34

27

01

21

10

06

33

08

31

10

28

09

04

30

22

16

02

12

0405

35

15

1009

05

32

08

29

20

17

08

05

01

12

13

24

25

36

01

12

33 34

14

32 35

15 13

36

16

31

1718

33

13

34

Battleford - Saskatoon Trail 1901NUNWT

SKAB MB

USA

FIGURE NO.Area

ofInterest

±

Last

Modif

ied: S

ep 11

, 201

2 By:

Hgers

tmar

PREPARED FOR:

113253776

City of Saskatoon North/NorthwestNatural Area Screening

Natural and HistoricalAreas of Interest

Acknowledgements: Original Drawing by Stantec.Imagery: 2009 60cm SGIC Imagery

4 km Airport BufferWetlandsTree stands

Natural Areas of InterestWetlandTree standEcological boundary

Tracked Wildlife#* Barn Swallow (S5B S5M- Threatened)#* Bobolink (S5B- Threatened)#* Sprague's Pipit (S3B-Threatened)

Tracked PlantsEngelmann' s spikerush (S2)

meadow pussytoes (S1)

narrow leaved cattail (S1?)

narrow leaved water plantain (S3)

northern blue-eyed grass (S3?)Heritage Sensitivity

NoYes

!( Archeological SiteArcheological Site- Section Land Claims and ReservesBattleford- Saskatoon TrailStudy_AreaWatercourse

PREPARED BY

1:51,307Scale:

9

Page 65: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY City of Saskatoon

APPENDIX A Land Capability for Agriculture - Classes and Subclasses

Page 66: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Soil Capability for Agriculture

The Canada Land Inventory (CLI) classification system is divided into 8 classes, which rate agricultural land capability and identify specific limiting factors to agricultural production. Class 1 lands have the highest capability to support agricultural land use activities and Class 7 lands have the lowest capability. The CLI Soil Capability for Agriculture classes and subclasses are described below (Environment Canada 1972).

Description

Class 1 Soils in this class have no significant limitations in use for crops. 2 Soils in this class have moderate limitations that restrict the range of crops or require

moderate conservation practices. 3 Soils in this class have moderately severe limitations that restrict the range of crops or

require special conservation practices. 4 Soils in this class have severe limitations that restrict the range of crops or require special

conservation practices, or both. 5 Soils in this class have very severe limitations that restrict their capability to producing

perennial forage crops, and improvement practices are feasible. 6 Soils in this class are capable only of producing perennial forage crops, and improvement

practices are not feasible. 7 Soils in this class have no capability for arable culture or permanent pasture. O Organic soils Subclasses

C Adverse Climate - this subclass denotes a significant adverse climate for crop production as 'median' climate which is defined as one with sufficiently high growing-season temperatures to bring crops to maturity.

E Erosion - this subclass includes soils where damage from erosion is a limitation to agricultural use.

M Moisture Limitations - this subclass consists of soils where crops are affected by drought owing to inherent soil characteristics. These soils usually have low water-holding capacity.

N Salinity – this subclass includes soils that possess excessive soluble salts which adversely affect crop growth or restrict the range of crops that may be grown.

P Stoniness – this subclass consists of soils that are sufficiently stony to hinder tillage, planting and harvesting operations.

T Topography - this subclass is made up of soils where topography is a limitation. Both the percent of slope and the pattern or frequency of slopes in different directions affect the cost of farming and the uniformity of growth and maturity of crops as well as the hazard of erosion.

W Excess Water - this subclass includes soils where excess water other than brought about by inundation is a limitation to agricultural use. Excess water may result from inadequate soil drainage, a high water table, seepage or from runoff from surrounding areas.

Page 67: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY City of Saskatoon

APPENDIX B Stewart and Kantrud (1971) Wetland Classification System

Page 68: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Stewart and Kantrud (1971) Wetland Classification System

The Stewart and Kantrud (1971) wetland classification system is divided into three hierarchical levels (classes, subclasses, and cover types). Numerous wetland characteristics, such as water permanence, water chemistry, vegetation life form, cover interspersion, species composition and dominance, are evaluated in order to classify a wetland. Below is a description of the Stewart and Kantrud (1971) wetland classes, subclasses, and cover types. Classes Each major class of natural ponds and lakes is distinguished by the vegetational zone that occurs in the central (or deepest) part and occupies 5% or more of the total wetland area. There are seven major classes of natural ponds and lakes, which include:

Class 1 – Ephemeral ponds Class 2 – Temporary ponds Class 3 – Seasonal ponds and lakes Class 4 – Semi-permanent ponds and lakes Class 5 – Permanent ponds and lakes Class 6 – Alkali ponds and lakes Class 7 – Fen (alkaline bog) ponds.

Subclasses The subclasses of natural ponds and lakes are based on differences in species composition of plant communities within the wet meadow, shallow marsh, or deep marsh zones, which are correlated with variations in average salinity of surface waters. Not all subclasses occur within each class of wetland. For example, no subclasses occur within Class I ephemeral ponds, Class VI alkali ponds and lakes, and Class VII fen ponds. Overall, there are five subclasses of natural ponds and lakes, which include:

Subclass A - Fresh (occurs in Class II, III, IV) Subclass B - Slightly Brackish (occurs in Class II, III, IV, V) Subclass C - Moderately Brackish (occurs in Class III, IV, V) Subclass D - Brackish (occurs in Class IV, V) Subclass E - Subsaline (occurs in Class IV, V).

Cover Types Cover types represent differences in the spatial relation between emergent vegetation cover and open water or exposed bottom soil. There are four cover types within natural ponds and lakes, which include:

Page 69: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Cover type 1 – closed stands of emergent vegetation with open water or bare soil covering less than 5 percent of wetland area. Cover type 2 – open water or bare soil covering 5 to 95 percent of the wetland area. Cover type 3 – open water surrounded by peripheral band of emergent vegetation cover, with an average width of 6 feet or more in width. Cover type 4 - open water surrounded by peripheral band of emergent vegetation cover, with an average width of less than 6 feet in width.

 

Page 70: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY City of Saskatoon

APPENDIX C Natural Area Inventory of the North/Northwest Screening Area

Page 71: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Table C.1. Natural Area Inventory of the North/Northwest Screening Area

QRT SEC TWP RGE MER5000 Wetland 21.54 4 3 NW 17 37 05 3 Y5001 Wetland 4.08 4 2 SW 20 37 05 3 Y5003 Wetland 5.31 3 1 N 30 37 05 3 Y5004 Wetland 4.83 3 1 NW 19 37 05 3 Y5006 Wetland 0.17 3 1 NW 19 37 05 3 Y5011 Wetland 1.18 3 1 SE 25 37 06 3 Y5012 Wetland 1.65 3 1 NE 24 37 06 3 Y5013 Wetland 0.89 2 1 NE 24 37 06 3 Y5014 Wetland 0.13 2 2 NW 19 37 05 3 Y5015 Wetland 0.55 3 2 NE 19 37 05 3 Y5017 Wetland 1.17 3 2 SW 30 37 05 3 Y5019 Wetland 0.10 3 2 SE 30 37 05 3 Y5020 Wetland 0.05 2 1 NE 25 37 06 3 Y5021 Wetland 0.52 3 3 SE 30 37 05 3 Y5022 Wetland 1.92 2 1 SE 30 37 05 3 Y5023 Wetland 0.13 2 1 NW 29 37 05 3 Y5024 Wetland 0.83 3 1 SW 32 37 05 3 Y5025 Wetland 0.62 2 1 SE 31 37 05 3 Y5026 Wetland 0.60 3 1 SE 31 37 05 3 Y5029 Wetland 0.24 3 3 E 20 37 05 3 Y5030 Wetland 0.08 3 3 SE 20 37 05 3 Y5031 Wetland 11.45 3 3 NW 20 37 05 3 Y5032 Wetland 0.22 3 - SE 25 37 06 3 Y5033 Wetland 2.41 3 2 S 29 37 05 3 Y5034 Wetland 6.41 3 1 NE 32 37 05 3 Y5035 Wetland 0.17 3 2 NE 32 37 05 3 Y5036 Wetland 0.19 3 1 NE 32 37 05 3 Y5037 Wetland 4.65 3 1 SE 32 37 05 3 Y5038 Wetland 0.50 3 1 SE 32 37 05 3 Y5039 Wetland 0.86 4 1 NW 33 37 05 3 Y5040 Wetland 0.08 3 1 NW 33 37 05 3 Y5041 Wetland 0.35 4 1 NW 33 37 05 3 Y5042 Wetland 0.48 4 2 NW 33 37 05 3 Y5043 Wetland 0.07 3 1 NW 33 37 05 3 Y5044 Wetland 0.11 3 1 NW 33 37 05 3 Y5045 Wetland 0.52 3 1 NW 33 37 05 3 Y5046 Wetland 0.38 3 1 NW 33 37 05 3 Y5047 Wetland 1.04 2 1 W 34 37 05 3 Y5048 Wetland 0.44 3 1 SW 34 37 05 3 Y5049 Wetland 2.50 3 2 SW 34 37 05 3 Y5050 Wetland 4.84 4 3 SE 33 37 05 3 Y5052 Wetland 0.46 5 - SW 26 37 05 3 Y5053 Wetland 0.30 4 - SW 26 37 05 3 Y5054 Wetland 1.31 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 Y5055 Wetland 0.26 3 - SW 26 37 05 3 Y5057 Wetland 0.78 3 - NW 26 37 05 3 Y5059 Wetland 1.53 3 1 NE 27 37 05 3 Y5060 Wetland 57.12 5 3 S 28 37 05 3 Y5061 Wetland 23.23 4 - NW 27 37 05 3 Y5062 Wetland 4.95 2 - SW 34 37 05 3 Y5063 Wetland 0.32 2 - NW 34 37 05 3 Y

Field Checked

Legal Land LocationNatural Area ID

Natural Area Type

Cover TypeArea (ha)Wetland

Class

Page 1 of 16

Page 72: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5065 Wetland 5.18 3 2 NW 32 37 05 3 Y5066 Wetland 1.73 3 1 NE 13 37 06 3 Y5067 Wetland 2.86 2 1 NE 13 37 06 3 Y5068 Wetland 0.40 2 1 NE 13 37 06 3 Y5069 Wetland 0.11 2 1 NE 13 37 06 3 Y5070 Wetland 0.06 2 1 NE 13 37 06 3 Y5071 Wetland 4.86 3 1 N 13 37 06 3 Y5072 Wetland 0.03 2 2 NE 13 37 06 3 Y5075 Wetland 1.00 3 2 E 16 37 06 3 Y5076 Wetland 0.35 3 2 NE 16 37 06 3 Y5077 Wetland 0.24 3 2 NE 16 37 06 3 Y5078 Wetland 0.95 3 2 NE 16 37 06 3 Y5079 Wetland 0.33 3 1 SW 22 37 06 3 Y5080 Wetland 0.32 3 3 SW 22 37 06 3 Y5081 Wetland 5.26 3 3 NW 22 37 06 3 Y5082 Wetland 0.27 3 3 NW 22 37 06 3 Y5083 Wetland 3.22 3 3 NW 22 37 06 3 Y5084 Wetland 1.73 3 3 NE 22 37 06 3 Y5085 Wetland 1.08 3 2 NE 22 37 06 3 Y5086 Wetland 0.05 3 2 NW 15 37 06 3 Y5087 Wetland 0.45 3 2 SE 22 37 06 3 Y5088 Wetland 1.32 3 2 SW 23 37 06 3 Y5089 Wetland 2.82 3 3 SW 23 37 06 3 Y5090 Wetland 2.56 3 2 SW 23 37 06 3 Y5091 Wetland 3.30 4 2 NW 14 37 06 3 Y5093 Wetland 1.22 4 2 NW 14 37 06 3 Y5094 Wetland 0.49 2 2 NW 14 37 06 3 Y5095 Wetland 0.95 3 2 SW 14 37 06 3 Y5096 Wetland 5.93 4 3 SE 14 37 06 3 Y5097 Wetland 0.70 3 - SW 14 37 06 3 Y5102 Wetland 2.33 3 - NW 14 37 06 3 Y5103 Wetland 2.70 4 3 SE 14 37 06 3 Y5104 Wetland 1.79 3 3 SE 14 37 06 3 Y5105 Wetland 1.25 3 2 SE 14 37 06 3 Y5106 Wetland 1.02 3 2 SE 14 37 06 3 Y5107 Wetland 4.30 3 3 SE 14 37 06 3 Y5108 Wetland 0.22 3 2 SE 14 37 06 3 Y5109 Wetland 1.82 3 2 SE 23 37 06 3 Y5110 Wetland 0.72 2 - SE 23 37 06 3 Y5111 Wetland 0.25 2 - SE 23 37 06 3 Y5112 Wetland 0.06 2 - SE 23 37 06 3 Y5113 Wetland 3.04 3 2 SE 23 37 06 3 Y5116 Wetland 0.34 3 - SE 23 37 06 3 Y5117 Wetland 0.05 3 - SE 23 37 06 3 Y5118 Wetland 0.24 3 - S 23 37 06 3 Y5119 Wetland 0.09 3 2 SE 23 37 06 3 Y5120 Wetland 0.55 3 2 S 23 37 06 3 Y5121 Wetland 0.05 2 2 SW 23 37 06 3 Y5122 Wetland 0.68 3 - SW 23 37 06 3 Y5123 Wetland 0.24 2 - SW 23 37 06 3 Y5124 Wetland 0.11 2 - SW 23 37 06 3 Y5125 Wetland 0.04 2 - SW 23 37 06 3 Y5126 Wetland 0.10 2 - SW 23 37 06 3 Y

Page 2 of 16

Page 73: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5127 Wetland 0.43 3 3 S 23 37 06 3 Y5128 Wetland 0.08 2 2 SE 23 37 06 3 Y5129 Wetland 3.23 4 - W 14 37 06 3 Y5131 Wetland 0.35 3 2 SE 23 37 06 3 Y5132 Wetland 0.06 2 - SE 23 37 06 3 Y5133 Wetland 0.69 3 2 SE 23 37 06 3 Y5134 Wetland 1.82 3 2 SE 23 37 06 3 Y5135 Wetland 0.41 3 - SE 23 37 06 3 Y5136 Wetland 0.73 3 - SE 23 37 06 3 Y5140 Wetland 2.78 3 2 W 24 37 06 3 Y5142 Wetland 0.22 2 3 NW 24 37 06 3 Y5143 Wetland 0.89 3 3 NW 24 37 06 3 Y5144 Wetland 9.88 4 3 NW 24 37 06 3 Y5145 Wetland 0.15 2 - NW 24 37 06 3 Y5146 Wetland 0.06 2 - NW 24 37 06 3 Y5147 Wetland 0.61 3 2 NW 24 37 06 3 Y5148 Wetland 0.15 3 2 NE 24 37 06 3 Y5149 Wetland 1.35 3 - SE 24 37 06 3 Y5150 Wetland 2.77 3 3 SW 24 37 06 3 Y5151 Wetland 0.10 2 3 SW 24 37 06 3 Y5152 Wetland 0.81 3 3 SW 24 37 06 3 Y5153 Wetland 0.33 3 2 SW 24 37 06 3 Y5154 Wetland 2.77 3 2 SW 24 37 06 3 Y5155 Wetland 0.57 3 3 SW 24 37 06 3 Y5156 Wetland 0.79 3 3 NW 24 37 06 3 Y5157 Wetland 6.67 3 3 NW 24 37 06 3 Y5158 Wetland 0.07 2 2 NW 24 37 06 3 Y5159 Wetland 2.84 3 3 NW 24 37 06 3 Y5160 Wetland 2.38 3 3 NE 24 37 06 3 Y5161 Wetland 3.51 4 3 NE 24 37 06 3 Y5162 Wetland 10.42 4 3 NE 24 37 06 3 Y5163 Wetland 5.03 3 3 NE 24 37 06 3 Y5164 Wetland 1.63 3 3 SE 24 37 06 3 Y5165 Wetland 0.20 3 3 SE 24 37 06 3 Y5166 Wetland 1.56 3 - SE 24 37 06 3 Y5170 Wetland 0.12 3 3 NW 24 37 06 3 Y5172 Wetland 0.71 3 1 N 24 37 06 3 Y5174 Wetland 0.34 2 - SE 24 37 06 3 Y5175 Wetland 0.33 3 2 SE 24 37 06 3 Y5176 Wetland 0.27 3 - SW 25 37 06 3 Y5177 Wetland 0.19 2 - SW 25 37 06 3 Y5178 Wetland 0.49 3 - W 25 37 06 3 Y5179 Wetland 0.07 2 - N 25 37 06 3 Y5180 Wetland 0.22 3 - S 25 37 06 3 Y5181 Wetland 0.40 4 - SW 25 37 06 3 Y5182 Wetland 0.09 2 2 SW 25 37 06 3 Y5183 Wetland 0.30 3 3 SE 26 37 06 3 Y5184 Wetland 2.26 2 2 SE 26 37 06 3 Y5185 Wetland 2.00 3 2 SE 26 37 06 3 Y5186 Wetland 2.23 3 3 SE 26 37 06 3 Y5187 Wetland 0.95 2 2 SE 26 37 06 3 Y5188 Wetland 1.46 3 - SE 26 37 06 3 Y5189 Wetland 0.46 3 - SE 26 37 06 3 Y

Page 3 of 16

Page 74: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5190 Wetland 1.10 4 - NW 25 37 06 3 Y5191 Wetland 0.61 3 - NW 25 37 06 3 Y5192 Wetland 0.18 3 - NE 25 37 06 3 Y5193 Wetland 0.73 4 3 SW 26 37 06 3 Y5194 Wetland 0.69 4 3 NW 23 37 06 3 Y5195 Wetland 2.27 3 2 SW 26 37 06 3 Y5196 Wetland 0.91 4 3 SW 26 37 06 3 Y5197 Wetland 0.66 3 3 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5198 Wetland 0.46 3 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5199 Wetland 0.08 3 3 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5200 Wetland 0.54 3 - SE 26 37 06 3 Y5201 Wetland 0.34 2 - SE 26 37 06 3 Y5202 Wetland 1.50 3 - SE 26 37 06 3 Y5203 Wetland 0.40 2 2 SE 26 37 06 3 Y5204 Wetland 4.24 3 2 S 26 37 06 3 Y5205 Wetland 0.58 3 2 SW 26 37 06 3 Y5206 Wetland 4.03 4 2 SW 26 37 06 3 Y5207 Wetland 0.05 3 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5208 Wetland 0.81 3 3 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5209 Wetland 0.45 3 4 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5210 Wetland 0.44 3 4 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5211 Wetland 2.37 3 3 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5212 Wetland 0.02 2 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5213 Wetland 0.30 3 3 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5214 Wetland 1.68 3 3 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5215 Wetland 0.32 2 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5216 Wetland 0.29 3 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5217 Wetland 0.00 3 2 SW 30 37 05 3 Y5218 Wetland 0.00 3 2 SW 30 37 05 3 Y5219 Wetland 0.01 3 2 SW 30 37 05 3 Y5220 Wetland 0.11 2 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5221 Wetland 0.01 2 - SE 27 37 06 3 Y5222 Wetland 0.48 2 3 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5223 Wetland 0.01 2 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5224 Wetland 0.03 3 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5225 Wetland 1.36 2 3 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5226 Wetland 0.19 2 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5227 Wetland 0.07 2 2 SE 27 37 06 3 Y5228 Wetland 0.08 3 - SE 27 37 06 3 Y5229 Wetland 0.65 2 - E 27 37 06 3 Y5300 Wetland 0.54 3 3 SE 35 37 06 3 Y5301 Wetland 0.51 3 2 SE 35 37 06 3 Y5302 Wetland 0.97 3 2 SW 36 37 06 3 Y5303 Wetland 0.81 3 2 SW 36 37 06 3 Y5304 Wetland 3.56 3 2 NW 36 37 06 3 Y5305 Wetland 0.88 2 2 SE 32 37 05 3 Y5307 Wetland 0.73 2 1 SE 32 37 05 3 Y5308 Wetland 0.32 3 2 NE 04 38 05 3 Y5310 Wetland 0.17 3 1 NW 05 38 05 3 Y5311 Wetland 0.83 3 - N 05 38 05 3 Y5312 Wetland 1.03 2 1 NW 04 38 05 3 Y5313 Wetland 0.10 4 3 SW 04 38 05 3 Y5314 Wetland 4.02 3 - SE 04 38 05 3 Y

Page 4 of 16

Page 75: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5320 Wetland 0.97 3 - SE 04 38 05 3 Y5321 Wetland 0.20 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5322 Wetland 0.39 3 2 NE 04 38 05 3 Y5323 Wetland 0.13 3 2 NE 04 38 05 3 Y5324 Wetland 0.17 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5325 Wetland 0.15 2 2 NE 04 38 05 3 Y5326 Wetland 0.09 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5327 Wetland 0.29 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5328 Wetland 0.25 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5329 Wetland 0.07 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5330 Wetland 0.41 3 2 N 04 38 05 3 Y5331 Wetland 0.33 3 - NW 04 38 05 3 Y5332 Wetland 0.48 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5333 Wetland 0.19 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5334 Wetland 0.26 2 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5335 Wetland 0.21 2 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5336 Wetland 0.86 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5337 Wetland 0.20 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5339 Wetland 0.26 3 - E 09 38 05 3 Y5340 Wetland 0.52 4 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5341 Wetland 0.62 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 Y5342 Wetland 0.31 3 2 NW 03 38 05 3 Y5343 Wetland 0.08 3 - NW 03 38 05 3 Y5345 Wetland 1.36 2 - NW 03 38 05 3 Y5346 Wetland 2.34 3 - NW 03 38 05 3 Y5347 Wetland 2.15 3 - NW 03 38 05 3 Y5348 Wetland 0.77 3 - NW 03 38 05 3 Y5349 Wetland 3.28 4 3 S 03 38 05 3 Y5351 Wetland 0.03 3 1 SW 03 38 05 3 Y5352 Wetland 0.25 3 - SW 03 38 05 3 Y5353 Wetland 1.93 3 - SW 03 38 05 3 Y5354 Wetland 1.56 3 2 NW 03 38 05 3 Y5355 Wetland 0.36 3 - SW 03 38 05 3 Y5356 Wetland 0.37 3 - SW 03 38 05 3 Y5357 Wetland 0.13 3 - SW 03 38 05 3 Y5358 Wetland 2.48 4 - SE 10 38 05 3 Y5359 Wetland 18.43 4 3 N 34 37 05 3 Y5360 Wetland 50.24 4 3 S 34 37 5 3 Y5361 Wetland 33.84 4 2 S 02 38 05 3 Y5362 Wetland 26.48 4 2 NE 34 37 05 3 Y5363 Wetland 4.67 3 2 NW 35 37 05 3 Y5364 Wetland 20.75 4 2 E 34 37 05 3 Y5365 Wetland 46.33 4 - W 21 37 05 3 N5366 Wetland 0.04 3 - NW 03 38 05 3 Y5367 Wetland 1.83 3 - SE 29 37 05 3 Y5400 Wetland 0.29 2 - SE 16 37 06 3 N5402 Wetland 0.08 2 - NE 16 37 06 3 N5403 Wetland 0.27 2 - NE 16 37 06 3 N5404 Wetland 0.03 2 - NE 16 37 06 3 N5405 Wetland 0.15 2 - NE 16 37 06 3 N5406 Wetland 1.08 2 - NE 16 37 06 3 Y5407 Wetland 0.07 2 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5408 Wetland 0.15 2 - NE 22 37 06 3 N

Page 5 of 16

Page 76: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5409 Wetland 0.48 2 - SE 24 37 06 3 N5410 Wetland 0.14 3 - SW 31 37 05 3 N5411 Wetland 0.14 3 - SE 04 38 05 3 N5412 Wetland 0.15 3 - SE 04 38 05 3 N5413 Wetland 9.42 2 - SE 04 38 05 3 N5414 Wetland 0.20 2 - SW 26 37 05 3 N5415 Wetland 0.31 2 - SW 26 37 05 3 N5416 Wetland 0.56 3 - SE 34 37 05 3 N5417 Wetland 0.25 2 - NW 26 37 05 3 N5500 Wetland 0.61 3 - SE 16 37 06 3 N5501 Wetland 0.19 3 2 NE 16 37 06 3 N5502 Wetland 0.55 3 2 NE 16 37 06 3 Y5503 Wetland 0.14 3 2 NE 16 37 06 3 Y5504 Wetland 0.34 2 2 NE 16 37 06 3 Y5505 Wetland 15.40 3 2 W 15 37 06 3 Y5506 Wetland 2.71 4 2 NW 15 37 06 3 N5507 Wetland 0.33 3 2 SE 14 37 06 3 N5508 Wetland 0.61 3 2 NW 22 37 06 3 Y5509 Wetland 1.49 3 2 SW 22 37 06 3 Y5510 Wetland 0.34 3 2 SW 22 37 06 3 Y5511 Wetland 0.25 3 2 SW 22 37 06 3 Y5512 Wetland 1.42 4 2 SW 22 37 06 3 Y5513 Wetland 4.12 3 - SE 22 37 06 3 Y5514 Wetland 0.58 3 - NE 22 37 06 3 Y5517 Wetland 2.71 3 - E 22 37 06 3 Y5518 Wetland 0.95 2 - SE 35 37 06 3 N5519 Wetland 1.59 3 - NE 32 37 05 3 N5520 Wetland 2.15 2 - E 05 38 05 3 N5521 Wetland 1.31 2 - SW 03 38 05 3 N5522 Wetland 0.32 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 N5523 Wetland 0.24 3 - NE 04 38 05 3 N5524 Wetland 0.22 3 - E 04 38 05 3 N5525 Wetland 0.40 4 - NE 04 38 05 3 N5526 Wetland 0.29 3 - SE 04 38 05 3 N5527 Wetland 2.14 2 - S 03 38 05 3 N5528 Wetland 0.32 3 - SE 03 38 05 3 N5529 Wetland 0.34 3 - W 03 38 05 3 N5530 Wetland 0.19 3 - NW 03 38 05 3 N5531 Wetland 0.36 3 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5532 Wetland 2.91 4 - NW 16 37 06 3 N5533 Wetland 6.88 4 - NW 16 37 06 3 N5534 Wetland 2.79 2 - N 16 37 06 3 N5535 Wetland 0.34 3 - NW 16 37 06 3 N5536 Wetland 3.97 3 - N 16 37 06 3 N5537 Wetland 0.45 3 - NW 16 37 06 3 N5538 Wetland 1.49 3 - W 16 37 06 3 N5539 Wetland 0.52 2 - SW 16 37 06 3 N5540 Wetland 66.61 4 - E 09 37 06 3 N5541 Wetland 2.68 3 - SE 16 37 06 3 N5542 Wetland 1.29 2 - SE 16 37 06 3 N5543 Wetland 1.95 2 - SW 16 37 06 3 N5544 Wetland 1.05 3 - NE 16 37 06 3 N5545 Wetland 1.12 3 - SE 16 37 06 3 N

Page 6 of 16

Page 77: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5546 Wetland 0.13 3 - SE 16 37 06 3 N5547 Wetland 1.34 3 - NE 16 37 06 3 N5548 Wetland 0.51 3 - NE 16 37 06 3 N5549 Wetland 0.12 3 - NE 16 37 06 3 N5550 Wetland 1.00 3 - NE 16 37 06 3 N5551 Wetland 0.30 2 - SE 16 37 06 3 N5552 Wetland 3.21 2 - SE 16 37 06 3 N5553 Wetland 0.26 4 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5554 Wetland 0.86 2 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5555 Wetland 0.73 3 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5556 Wetland 0.18 2 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5557 Wetland 0.29 2 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5558 Wetland 2.77 3 - SE 16 37 06 3 N5559 Wetland 0.09 3 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5560 Wetland 3.58 4 - SE 15 37 06 3 N5561 Wetland 0.80 3 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5562 Wetland 1.23 3 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5563 Wetland 0.33 3 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5564 Wetland 0.66 3 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5565 Wetland 6.70 3 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5566 Wetland 2.12 3 - SE 15 37 06 3 N5567 Wetland 2.33 4 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5568 Wetland 1.66 3 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5569 Wetland 3.19 4 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5570 Wetland 0.26 3 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5571 Wetland 0.17 3 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5572 Wetland 0.33 3 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5573 Wetland 1.31 3 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5574 Wetland 1.81 3 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5575 Wetland 0.65 2 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5576 Wetland 0.35 3 - NW 15 37 06 3 N5577 Wetland 0.52 3 - NW 15 37 06 3 N5578 Wetland 0.52 2 - NW 15 37 06 3 N5579 Wetland 0.14 2 - NW 15 37 06 3 N5580 Wetland 1.13 2 - NW 15 37 06 3 N5581 Wetland 0.13 3 - NW 15 37 06 3 N5582 Wetland 0.24 3 - NW 15 37 06 3 N5583 Wetland 10.35 2 - SW 15 37 06 3 N5584 Wetland 0.24 2 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5585 Wetland 0.06 2 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5586 Wetland 0.11 2 - NE 15 37 06 3 N5587 Wetland 5.19 3 - SE 15 37 06 3 N5588 Wetland 1.38 3 - SE 15 37 06 3 N5589 Wetland 1.24 3 - SE 15 37 06 3 N5590 Wetland 0.56 3 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5591 Wetland 0.40 3 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5592 Wetland 1.49 3 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5593 Wetland 0.20 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5594 Wetland 0.17 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5595 Wetland 0.27 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5596 Wetland 0.77 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5597 Wetland 1.10 3 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5598 Wetland 0.41 3 - SW 14 37 06 3 N

Page 7 of 16

Page 78: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5599 Wetland 0.08 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5600 Wetland 0.54 2 - SW 23 37 06 3 N5601 Wetland 0.19 2 - SW 23 37 06 3 N5602 Wetland 1.25 4 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5603 Wetland 1.64 3 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5604 Wetland 0.12 3 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5605 Wetland 0.27 2 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5606 Wetland 0.19 2 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5607 Wetland 1.97 2 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5608 Wetland 2.38 3 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5609 Wetland 0.27 3 - NE 23 37 06 3 N5610 Wetland 0.23 3 - NE 23 37 06 3 N5611 Wetland 1.28 3 - NE 23 37 06 3 N5613 Wetland 0.22 2 - NE 23 37 06 3 N5614 Wetland 13.31 4 - NE 23 37 06 3 N5615 Wetland 0.33 3 - NE 23 37 06 3 N5616 Wetland 1.63 3 - SE 23 37 06 3 N5617 Wetland 1.03 3 - NE 23 37 06 3 N5618 Wetland 0.57 3 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5619 Wetland 6.86 2 - NE 23 37 06 3 N5620 Wetland 0.09 3 - NE 23 37 06 3 N5621 Wetland 2.04 3 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5622 Wetland 0.29 3 - NW 23 37 06 3 N5623 Wetland 1.54 3 - NE 22 37 06 3 Y5624 Wetland 0.19 3 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5625 Wetland 0.13 2 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5626 Wetland 0.30 2 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5627 Wetland 0.33 3 - NW 03 38 05 3 N5628 Wetland 0.25 3 - NW 03 38 05 3 N5629 Wetland 0.98 3 - NW 22 37 06 3 Y5630 Wetland 0.51 3 - NW 22 37 06 3 N5631 Wetland 2.28 4 - NW 22 37 06 3 N5632 Wetland 0.23 2 - NW 22 37 06 3 N5633 Wetland 0.42 2 - NW 22 37 06 3 N5634 Wetland 1.28 2 - NW 22 37 06 3 N5635 Wetland 1.96 3 - NW 22 37 06 3 N5636 Wetland 0.24 2 - NW 22 37 06 3 N5637 Wetland 0.25 3 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5638 Wetland 0.22 3 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5639 Wetland 0.09 2 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5640 Wetland 3.33 2 - NE 22 37 06 3 Y5641 Wetland 0.22 3 - SE 22 37 06 3 N5642 Wetland 3.42 3 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5643 Wetland 0.42 3 - SE 22 37 06 3 N5645 Wetland 1.70 3 - SE 22 37 06 3 N5646 Wetland 1.51 3 - SE 22 37 06 3 N5647 Wetland 1.00 3 - SE 22 37 06 3 N5648 Wetland 2.13 2 - SE 22 37 06 3 N5649 Wetland 0.34 2 - SE 22 37 06 3 N5650 Wetland 0.37 2 - SE 22 37 06 3 N5651 Wetland 0.82 2 - SW 22 37 06 3 Y5652 Wetland 0.29 2 - SW 22 37 06 3 Y5653 Wetland 0.20 2 - SW 22 37 06 3 N

Page 8 of 16

Page 79: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5654 Wetland 0.19 2 - SW 22 37 06 3 N5655 Wetland 0.20 2 - SE 35 37 06 3 N5656 Wetland 1.14 3 - SW 36 37 06 3 N5657 Wetland 3.10 2 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5658 Wetland 0.34 2 - NW 36 37 06 3 N5659 Wetland 1.18 2 - NW 36 37 06 3 N5660 Wetland 0.16 3 - NW 36 37 06 3 N5661 Wetland 1.43 2 - NW 36 37 06 3 N5662 Wetland 0.25 2 - SW 24 37 06 3 N5663 Wetland 2.67 4 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5664 Wetland 0.79 3 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5665 Wetland 0.03 2 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5666 Wetland 0.07 3 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5667 Wetland 1.21 3 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5668 Wetland 0.07 2 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5669 Wetland 0.08 2 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5670 Wetland 0.43 3 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5671 Wetland 3.78 4 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5672 Wetland 0.29 3 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5673 Wetland 0.89 2 - SW 13 37 06 3 N5674 Wetland 0.30 2 - SW 13 37 06 3 N5675 Wetland 2.08 4 - SW 13 37 06 3 N5676 Wetland 0.79 2 - SW 13 37 06 3 N5677 Wetland 7.47 3 - NW 13 37 06 3 N5678 Wetland 1.35 3 - SW 13 37 06 3 N5679 Wetland 4.61 2 - SW 13 37 06 3 N5680 Wetland 0.81 4 - SW 13 37 06 3 N5681 Wetland 0.61 2 - SE 36 37 06 3 N5682 Wetland 0.14 2 - NE 36 37 06 3 N5683 Wetland 0.96 2 - NE 36 37 06 3 N5684 Wetland 7.34 2 - SW 31 37 05 3 N5685 Wetland 0.22 3 - NW 06 38 05 3 N5686 Wetland 0.31 2 - NW 06 38 05 3 N5687 Wetland 0.02 3 - NW 06 38 05 3 N5688 Wetland 0.03 3 - NW 06 38 05 3 N5689 Wetland 0.14 2 - NW 06 38 05 3 N5690 Wetland 0.15 3 - NE 06 38 05 3 N5691 Wetland 0.27 2 - NW 31 37 05 3 N5692 Wetland 0.06 3 - NW 31 37 05 3 N5693 Wetland 0.08 3 - NW 31 37 05 3 N5694 Wetland 0.04 3 - NW 31 37 05 3 N5696 Wetland 0.24 2 - SW 31 37 05 3 N5697 Wetland 0.10 3 - SW 31 37 05 3 N5698 Wetland 0.13 2 - NW 30 37 05 3 N5699 Wetland 0.09 2 - NW 30 37 05 3 N5700 Wetland 0.65 2 - NW 19 37 05 3 N5701 Wetland 0.08 3 - NW 19 37 05 3 N5702 Wetland 0.32 4 - NW 19 37 05 3 N5703 Wetland 0.39 2 - NE 19 37 05 3 N5704 Wetland 0.04 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5705 Wetland 0.12 3 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5706 Wetland 0.78 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5707 Wetland 0.13 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N

Page 9 of 16

Page 80: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5708 Wetland 0.03 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5709 Wetland 0.02 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5710 Wetland 0.17 3 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5713 Wetland 0.07 2 - NE 17 37 05 3 N5714 Wetland 0.04 2 - NE 17 37 05 3 N5715 Wetland 0.51 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5716 Wetland 0.07 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5717 Wetland 0.14 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5718 Wetland 0.02 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5719 Wetland 0.01 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5720 Wetland 0.54 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5721 Wetland 0.22 2 - NE 17 37 05 3 N5722 Wetland 0.37 2 - NW 17 37 05 3 N5725 Wetland 0.02 2 - SW 20 37 05 3 N5726 Wetland 0.01 2 - SW 20 37 05 3 N5727 Wetland 0.07 2 - NE 30 37 05 3 N5745 Wetland 1.52 2 - SE 05 38 05 3 N5746 Wetland 2.03 3 - SW 05 38 05 3 N5747 Wetland 1.18 2 - SE 05 38 05 3 N5748 Wetland 3.17 3 - SE 05 38 05 3 N5749 Wetland 0.24 3 - SE 05 38 05 3 N5750 Wetland 1.55 3 - SE 05 38 05 3 N5751 Wetland 0.16 3 - SE 05 38 05 3 N5752 Wetland 0.34 3 - SE 05 38 05 3 N5753 Wetland 1.25 3 - SW 05 38 05 3 N5754 Wetland 0.23 2 - SW 05 38 05 3 N5755 Wetland 1.22 3 - SW 05 38 05 3 N5756 Wetland 0.13 3 - SW 05 38 05 3 N5757 Wetland 0.39 3 - SW 05 38 05 3 N5758 Wetland 0.03 3 - SW 05 38 05 3 N5759 Wetland 0.09 3 - SW 05 38 05 3 N5760 Wetland 0.32 2 - SW 05 38 05 3 N5761 Wetland 0.18 2 - NE 06 38 05 3 N5762 Wetland 0.29 2 - NW 05 38 05 3 N5763 Wetland 0.71 2 - NW 05 38 05 3 N5764 Wetland 0.14 2 - NW 05 38 05 3 N5765 Wetland 0.10 3 - SE 06 38 05 3 N5766 Wetland 0.08 3 - SE 06 38 05 3 N5768 Wetland 0.14 2 - SE 06 38 05 3 N5769 Wetland 0.39 2 - SE 06 38 05 3 N5770 Wetland 0.98 2 - SE 06 38 05 3 N5771 Wetland 0.06 2 - SE 06 38 05 3 N5772 Wetland 0.04 2 - SE 06 38 05 3 N5773 Wetland 1.02 2 - NE 31 37 05 3 N5776 Wetland 0.07 2 - SE 30 37 05 3 N5777 Wetland 0.21 2 - SE 30 37 05 3 N5778 Wetland 0.08 3 - SE 30 37 05 3 N5779 Wetland 0.13 2 - SE 30 37 05 3 N5780 Wetland 0.13 2 - SE 30 37 05 3 N5781 Wetland 0.05 2 - SE 30 37 05 3 N5782 Wetland 0.18 2 - SE 30 37 05 3 N5783 Wetland 1.20 3 - SW 29 37 05 3 N5784 Wetland 3.73 2 - SW 29 37 05 3 N

Page 10 of 16

Page 81: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5785 Wetland 0.62 2 - NW 29 37 05 3 N5786 Wetland 0.22 2 - NW 29 37 05 3 N5787 Wetland 0.08 2 - SW 32 37 05 3 N5788 Wetland 0.17 2 - NW 29 37 05 3 N5789 Wetland 0.14 2 - NW 29 37 05 3 N5790 Wetland 0.16 3 - NW 29 37 05 3 N5791 Wetland 0.14 2 - NW 29 37 05 3 N5792 Wetland 0.06 2 - SW 32 37 05 3 N5793 Wetland 0.27 2 - NW 20 37 05 3 N5794 Wetland 0.09 3 - SE 29 37 05 3 N5795 Wetland 0.97 3 - NE 29 37 05 3 N5796 Wetland 0.06 3 - NE 29 37 05 3 N5797 Wetland 0.29 2 - SE 32 37 05 3 N5798 Wetland 0.52 2 - SE 32 37 05 3 N5799 Wetland 0.42 2 - SE 32 37 05 3 N5800 Wetland 0.16 2 - SE 32 37 05 3 N5801 Wetland 0.16 2 - NW 05 38 05 3 N5802 Wetland 0.28 2 - NW 05 38 05 3 N5803 Wetland 0.41 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 N5804 Wetland 0.86 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 N5804 Wetland 0.58 3 - SW 22 37 06 3 Y5805 Wetland 0.83 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 N5806 Wetland 0.40 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 N5807 Wetland 0.21 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 N5808 Wetland 0.03 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 N5809 Wetland 0.21 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 N5810 Wetland 0.03 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 N5811 Wetland 0.67 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 N5812 Wetland 1.25 2 - NW 33 37 05 3 N5812 Wetland 0.65 3 1 NW 33 37 05 3 N5813 Wetland 0.08 2 - NW 33 37 05 3 N5814 Wetland 0.52 3 - NW 33 37 05 3 N5815 Wetland 0.20 2 - NW 33 37 05 3 N5816 Wetland 0.16 3 - NW 33 37 05 3 N5817 Wetland 2.32 2 - SW 28 37 05 3 N5821 Wetland 0.22 2 - NW 28 37 05 3 N5822 Wetland 0.25 3 - SE 28 37 05 3 N5823 Wetland 0.36 3 - SE 28 37 05 3 N5825 Wetland 1.30 2 - SW 34 37 05 3 N5826 Wetland 7.90 2 - NE 34 37 05 3 N5827 Wetland 1.55 3 - NE 27 37 05 3 N5828 Wetland 0.14 2 - NE 27 37 05 3 N5829 Wetland 5.81 4 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5830 Wetland 0.96 4 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5831 Wetland 0.38 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5832 Wetland 1.23 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5833 Wetland 0.62 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5834 Wetland 0.29 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5835 Wetland 0.22 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5836 Wetland 0.27 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5837 Wetland 0.10 2 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5838 Wetland 0.65 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5839 Wetland 0.09 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N

Page 11 of 16

Page 82: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5840 Wetland 0.55 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5841 Wetland 0.15 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5842 Wetland 0.37 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5843 Wetland 0.29 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5844 Wetland 0.09 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5845 Wetland 0.16 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5846 Wetland 0.04 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5847 Wetland 0.09 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5848 Wetland 0.03 3 - SE 27 37 05 3 N5849 Wetland 0.75 3 - SW 26 37 05 3 N5850 Wetland 0.05 2 - SW 26 37 05 3 N5851 Wetland 0.86 3 - SW 26 37 05 3 N5852 Wetland 0.04 2 - NW 26 37 05 3 N5853 Wetland 0.09 2 - NW 26 37 05 3 N5854 Wetland 0.32 2 - NW 26 37 05 3 N5855 Wetland 0.22 2 - NW 26 37 05 3 N5856 Wetland 3.44 4 - NW 26 37 05 3 N5857 Wetland 0.09 2 - NW 26 37 05 3 N5858 Wetland 0.13 2 - NW 26 37 05 3 N5859 Wetland 3.08 4 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5860 Wetland 0.30 3 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5861 Wetland 0.32 3 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5862 Wetland 0.44 2 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5863 Wetland 0.85 3 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5864 Wetland 0.26 2 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5865 Wetland 0.56 3 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5866 Wetland 1.43 3 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5867 Wetland 1.21 3 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5868 Wetland 0.61 3 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5869 Wetland 0.65 2 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5870 Wetland 1.78 2 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5871 Wetland 0.06 2 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5872 Wetland 0.19 2 - SW 35 37 05 3 N5873 Wetland 1.43 3 - NE 34 37 05 3 N5874 Wetland 0.93 3 - NE 34 37 05 3 N5875 Wetland 0.59 2 - NW 35 37 05 3 N5876 Wetland 0.57 3 - SE 03 38 05 3 N5877 Wetland 0.25 2 - SW 02 38 05 3 N5878 Wetland 1.23 2 - SW 02 38 05 3 N5879 Wetland 0.22 3 - SW 02 38 05 3 N5880 Wetland 0.66 2 - NW 02 38 05 3 N5881 Wetland 0.14 3 - SW 11 38 05 3 N5882 Wetland 1.45 2 - NW 03 38 05 3 N5883 Wetland 0.23 2 - NW 03 38 05 3 N5884 Wetland 0.56 2 - NW 16 37 06 3 N5885 Wetland 1.47 2 - NW 16 37 06 3 N5886 Wetland 0.13 2 - SE 22 37 06 3 N5887 Wetland 1.34 3 - SW 14 37 06 3 Y5888 Wetland 2.27 2 - NW 32 37 05 3 N5889 Wetland 4.30 2 - NE 32 37 05 3 N5901 Wetland 6.30 2 - NE 36 37 06 3 Y5902 Wetland 0.21 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 Y5903 Wetland 0.26 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 Y

Page 12 of 16

Page 83: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5904 Wetland 0.20 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 Y5905 Wetland 3.39 2 - NE 05 38 05 3 Y5906 Wetland 0.38 3 2 NW 03 38 05 3 Y5907 Wetland 1.35 3 2 NW 03 38 05 3 Y5908 Wetland 0.38 3 2 NW 03 38 05 3 Y5909 Wetland 0.26 3 2 SW 30 37 05 3 Y5910 Wetland 0.22 3 - NE 05 38 05 3 Y5912 Wetland 0.12 3 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5913 Wetland 0.09 3 - SE 14 37 06 3 N5914 Wetland 0.09 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5915 Wetland 0.09 3 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5916 Wetland 0.18 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5917 Wetland 1.41 2 - SW 14 37 06 3 N5918 Wetland 0.31 2 - SE 14 37 06 3 N5919 Wetland 1.69 2 - SE 14 37 06 3 N5920 Wetland 0.27 2 - SE 14 37 06 3 N5921 Wetland 0.97 3 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5922 Wetland 0.49 3 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5923 Wetland 0.06 2 - SE 14 37 06 3 N5924 Wetland 0.16 2 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5925 Wetland 0.25 2 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5926 Wetland 0.22 2 - SE 14 37 06 3 N5927 Wetland 0.05 2 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5928 Wetland 0.19 2 - SE 14 37 06 3 N5929 Wetland 0.08 3 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5930 Wetland 0.54 2 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5931 Wetland 1.28 3 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5932 Wetland 0.23 3 - NW 15 37 06 3 N5933 Wetland 0.32 2 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5934 Wetland 2.57 3 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5935 Wetland 0.78 2 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5936 Wetland 0.14 3 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5937 Wetland 0.34 3 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5938 Wetland 0.23 2 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5939 Wetland 0.42 3 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5940 Wetland 2.16 3 - NE 14 37 06 3 N5942 Wetland 0.38 2 - SE 23 37 06 3 N5943 Wetland 0.20 2 - SE 23 37 06 3 N5944 Wetland 3.57 2 - SE 33 37 5 3 Y5945 Wetland 0.28 3 - SE 33 37 5 3 Y5948 Wetland 0.57 3 - SW 23 37 06 3 N5949 Wetland 0.08 2 - SE 29 37 5 3 N5952 Wetland 0.21 2 - NW 22 37 06 3 N5953 Wetland 3.80 2 - NW 22 37 06 3 N5954 Wetland 1.19 2 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5955 Wetland 0.71 3 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5956 Wetland 1.41 2 - NE 22 37 06 3 N5958 Wetland 0.45 2 - SW 26 37 06 3 N5959 Wetland 0.32 2 - SW 26 37 06 3 N5960 Wetland 0.61 2 - SW 26 37 06 3 N5961 Wetland 1.11 3 - NW 26 37 06 3 N5962 Wetland 0.04 2 - NW 26 37 06 3 N5965 Wetland 0.12 3 - NE 26 37 06 3 N

Page 13 of 16

Page 84: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

5966 Wetland 0.04 2 - NE 26 37 06 3 N5967 Wetland 0.05 3 - NE 26 37 06 3 N5968 Wetland 0.05 2 - NE 26 37 06 3 N5969 Wetland 0.03 2 - NE 26 37 06 3 N5970 Wetland 0.09 2 - SE 35 37 06 3 N5971 Wetland 0.18 2 - SE 35 37 06 3 N5972 Wetland 0.69 2 - SW 03 38 05 3 N5973 Wetland 0.09 2 - SW 03 38 05 3 N5974 Wetland 0.15 2 - SW 03 38 05 3 N5975 Wetland 0.50 2 - SW 03 38 05 3 N5976 Wetland 1.25 4 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5977 Wetland 0.12 3 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5978 Wetland 0.20 3 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5979 Wetland 0.30 3 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5980 Wetland 0.21 3 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5982 Wetland 0.43 2 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5983 Wetland 1.42 2 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5984 Wetland 0.17 2 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5985 Wetland 0.25 2 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5986 Wetland 0.21 2 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5988 Wetland 0.03 4 - NE 03 38 05 3 N5989 Wetland 0.17 2 - SW 25 37 06 3 N5990 Wetland 7.79 2 - SW 29 37 05 3 N5993 Wetland 0.71 3 2 SE 03 38 05 3 Y5994 Wetland 0.08 3 - SE 03 38 05 3 Y5995 Wetland 0.07 3 - SE 03 38 05 3 Y5996 Wetland 0.85 3 - SE 21 37 05 3 N5997 Wetland 0.15 3 - NW 26 37 06 3 N5998 Wetland 7.24 2 - NW 20 37 05 3 N5999 Wetland 1.35 2 - SW 04 38 05 3 N7432 Wetland 0.19 3 - SW 26 37 05 3 N7437 Wetland 0.06 2 - NE 33 37 05 3 N7438 Wetland 0.15 3 - NW 33 37 05 3 N7439 Wetland 0.12 3 - NW 33 37 05 3 N7440 Wetland 0.17 3 - NW 33 37 05 3 N7442 Wetland 0.37 3 - NW 33 37 05 3 N7443 Wetland 0.69 2 - NW 33 37 05 3 N7444 Wetland 3.65 3 - NE 32 37 05 3 Y7445 Wetland 3.00 3 - NE 32 37 05 3 Y7446 Wetland 2.76 2 - NW 32 37 05 3 Y7446 Wetland 4.98 3 - NE 32 37 05 3 Y7447 Wetland 4.60 3 - SW 32 37 05 3 N7448 Wetland 8.13 4 - SE 32 37 05 3 N7449 Wetland 0.48 2 - SW 32 37 05 3 N7450 Wetland 0.38 2 - SW 32 37 05 3 N7451 Wetland 0.07 4 - NW 29 37 05 3 N7452 Wetland 2.05 3 - SW 29 37 05 3 N7454 Wetland 1.46 4 - SW 29 37 05 3 N7456 Wetland 0.85 3 - SW 29 37 05 3 N7458 Wetland 0.06 3 - SE 29 37 05 3 N7459 Wetland 6.00 3 - SW 29 37 05 3 N7462 Wetland 0.04 3 - NW 20 37 05 3 N7463 Wetland 0.18 4 - NW 20 37 05 3 N

Page 14 of 16

Page 85: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

7465 Wetland 0.33 3 - NW 17 37 05 3 N7466 Wetland 0.29 3 - NW 17 37 05 3 N7467 Wetland 2.25 4 - NW 19 37 05 3 Y7468 Wetland 1.35 3 - NW 19 37 05 3 Y7469 Wetland 0.07 2 - NW 19 37 05 3 N7470 Wetland 0.13 3 - NW 19 37 05 3 N7471 Wetland 0.46 2 - NW 19 37 05 3 N7472 Wetland 0.35 3 - NW 19 37 05 3 N7475 Wetland 0.24 4 - SE 30 37 05 3 N7476 Wetland 0.04 3 - SE 30 37 05 3 N7478 Wetland 0.10 2 - NE 30 37 05 3 N7479 Wetland 0.17 3 - NW 30 37 05 3 N7481 Wetland 0.23 2 - NE 30 37 05 3 N7484 Wetland 0.11 2 - NW 30 37 05 3 N7489 Wetland 3.16 2 - SW 31 37 05 3 N7490 Wetland 0.14 2 - SW 31 37 05 3 N7491 Wetland 1.15 2 - SW 31 37 05 3 N7493 Wetland 0.87 2 - SE 31 37 05 3 N7494 Wetland 0.34 3 - SE 31 37 05 3 N7495 Wetland 0.16 3 - SE 31 37 05 3 N7497 Wetland 0.18 3 - SE 31 37 05 3 N7498 Wetland 0.13 3 - SE 31 37 05 3 N7500 Wetland 0.14 3 - SE 25 37 06 3 N7501 Wetland 0.09 3 - SW 25 37 06 3 N8010 Tree stand 0.94 Trees - NW 26 37 06 3 Y8087 Tree stand 0.20 Trees - SW 22 37 06 3 Y8100 Tree stand 0.37 Trees - SW 26 37 06 3 Y8300 Tree stand 0.13 Trees - SW 36 37 06 3 Y8301 Tree stand 3.76 Trees - NE 05 38 05 3 Y8302 Tree stand 2.90 Trees - NW 05 38 05 3 Y8303 Tree stand 0.18 Trees - NW 05 38 05 3 Y8304 Tree stand 0.22 Trees - NW 05 38 05 3 Y8305 Tree stand 0.13 Trees - NW 05 38 05 3 Y8306 Tree stand 0.24 Trees - NW 05 38 05 3 Y8307 Tree stand 4.25 Trees - NE 05 38 05 3 Y8308 Tree stand 2.80 Trees - SE 04 38 05 3 Y8501 Tree stand 3.03 Trees - SE 21 37 05 3 N8502 Tree stand 1.55 Trees - SW 21 37 05 3 N8503 Tree stand 0.60 Trees - NE 21 37 05 3 N8504 Tree stand 6.41 Trees - SE 21 37 05 3 N8505 Tree stand 0.53 Trees - SW 16 37 06 3 N8506 Tree stand 0.35 Trees - NE 16 37 06 3 N8507 Tree stand 0.97 Trees - NE 16 37 06 3 N8508 Tree stand 0.43 Trees - NE 16 37 06 3 N8509 Tree stand 1.08 Trees - SE 27 37 06 3 N8509 Tree stand 3.31 Trees - SE 27 37 06 3 N8510 Tree stand 1.75 Trees - SW 27 37 06 3 N8511 Tree stand 0.47 Trees - SE 27 37 06 3 N8512 Tree stand 2.63 Trees - SE 27 37 06 3 N8513 Tree stand 0.91 Trees - NE 15 37 06 3 N8514 Tree stand 1.43 Trees - SE 26 37 06 3 N8515 Tree stand 1.65 Trees - NW 26 37 06 3 N8516 Tree stand 4.82 Trees - SE 35 37 06 3 N

Page 15 of 16

Page 86: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

QRT SEC TWP RGE MERField

CheckedLegal Land LocationNatural

Area IDNatural

Area TypeCover TypeArea (ha)

Wetland Class

8517 Tree stand 1.84 Trees - SE 35 37 06 3 N8518 Tree stand 1.54 Trees - SE 25 37 06 3 N8519 Tree stand 1.13 Trees - SW 25 37 06 3 N8520 Tree stand 2.81 Trees - NW 36 37 06 3 N8521 Tree stand 0.80 Trees - NE 35 37 06 3 N8522 Tree stand 1.81 Trees - SE 30 37 05 3 N8523 Tree stand 1.34 Trees - SW 05 38 05 3 N8524 Tree stand 0.79 Trees - NE 27 37 05 3 N8524 Tree stand 1.33 Trees - NE 27 37 05 3 N8525 Tree stand 13.30 Trees - SE 23 37 05 3 N

Page 16 of 16

Page 87: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Scientific name Common name

Provincial

Designations1

Acer negundo L. Manitoba MapleAchillea millefolium L. common yarrowAgropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. crested wheatgrassAlisma gramineum Lej. narrow-leaved water plantain S3Alisma subcordatum Raf. broad-leaved water plantain / water plantainAlopecurus aequalis var. aequalis Sobol. short-awned foxtailAmaranthus blitoides S. Watson prostrate pigweedAnemone canadensis L. Canada anemoneAntennaria corymbosa E.E. Nelson* meadow pussytoes S1Antennaria microphylla Rydb. small-leaved pussytoesArtemisia absinthium L. absinthe NoxiousArtemisia biennis Willd. biennial wormwoodArtemisia ludoviciana Nutt. prairie sageAster sp aster spBeckmannia syzigachne (Steud.) Fernald slough grassBolboschoenus maritimus ssp. paludosus (A. Nelson) Á. Löve & D. Löve prairie bulrushBrachythecium sp aquatic mossBrassica sp mustard spBromus inermis Leyss. smooth bromeCalamagrostis stricta ssp. inexpansa (A. Gray) C.W. Greene northern reed grassCallitriche palustris L. water starwortCampanula rotundifolia L. harebellCapsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. shepherd's purseCarduus nutans L. nodding thistle NoxiousCarex aquatilis Wahlenb. water sedgeCarex atherodes Spreng. awned sedgeCarex athrostachya Olney long-bracted sedgeCarex bebbii Olney ex Fernald bebb's sedgeCarex rossii Boott ross' sedgeCarex rostrata Stokes beaked sedgeCarex pellita Muhl. ex Willd. wooly sedgeCarex praticola Rydb. meadow sedgeCarex sp sedge spCerastium fontanum ssp. vulgare (Hartm.) Greuter & Burdet common chickweed / common mouse-ear chickweedCeratophyllum demersum L. hornwortChenopodium L. goosefootCirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Canada thistle NoxiousCirsium sp thistle spCollomia linearis Nutt. narrow-leaved collomiaComandra umbellata (L.) Nutt. pale comandraConyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist Canada fleabaneCornus stolonifera Michx. red-osier dogwoodCrepis tectorum L. narrow leaved hawk's-beard NoxiousDescurainia sophia (L.) Webb ex Prantl flixweedDistichlis spicata (L.) Greene alkali grass / salt grassEchinochloa crus-galli var. crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv. barnyard grassElaeagnus commutata Bernh. ex Rydb. wolfwillowEleocharis acicularis (L.) Roem. & Schult. needle spikerushEleocharis engelmannii Engelmann's spikerush S2Eleocharis palustris (L.) Roem. & Schult. creeping spikerushEleocharis sp spikerush spElymus repens (L.) Gould quack grass NuisanceEpilobium palustre L. marsh willowherbEquisetum arvense L. common horsetailEquisetum sp horsetail spErigeron sp fleabane spEriophorum sp cottongrass spFragaria virginiana ssp. glauca (S. Watson) Staudt wild strawberry

Table C.2. Vegetation Species Observed within the Study Area

Page 1 of 3

Page 88: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Scientific name Common name

Provincial

Designations1

Gaillardia aristata Pursh gaillardiaGalium aparine L. cleavers NoxiousGalium boreale L. northern bedstrawGlyceria grandis var. grandis S. Watson tall manna grass / american manna grassGlyceria striata (Lam.) Hitchc. fowl manna grassGlycyrrhiza lepidota Pursh. wild licoriceGrindelia squarrosa var. quasiperennis Lunell gumweedHelianthus annus L. ssp. lenticularis (Lindl.) Cockerell common annual sunflowerHieracium umbellatum L. hawkweedHordeum jubatum ssp. jubatum L. foxtail barley NuisanceJuncus filiformis L. thread rushJuncus sp rush spJuncus subtilis E. Mey. slender rushLactuca serriola L. prickly lettuce NoxiousLappula occidentalis (S. Watson) Greene western bluebur / flat-spine sheepbur / stickseedLemna minor L. lesser duckweedLemna sp duckweed spLemna trisulca L. ivy-leaved duckweedLeucanthemum vulgare Lam. oxeye daisy NoxiousLimosella aquatica L. mudwortLycopus uniflorus Michx. northern horehoundLysimachia maritima (L.) Galasso, Banfi & Soldano sea milkwortMedicago lupulina L. black medicMedicago sativa L. alfalfaMelilotus albus Medik. white sweet cloverMelilotus officinalis (L.) Lam. yellow sweet cloverMelilotus sp sweet cloverMentha arvensis L. wild mintMonolepis nuttalliana (Schult.) Greene spear-leaved goosefootMyriophyllum sibiricum Kom. northern milfoil, siberian water-milfoil Oenothera biennis L. yellow evening primroseOrthocarpus luteus Nutt. owl's cloverPersicaria amphibia (L.) Delarbre water smartweedPersicaria lapathifolia (L.) Gray nodding smartweedPhalaris arundinacea L. reed canarygrassPlantago major L. common/prairie plantainPoa compressa L. Canada bluegrassPoa palustris L. fowl blue grassPoa pratensis L. kentucky bluegrassPoa secunda ssp. secunda J. Presl canby bluePoa sp bluegrass spPolygonum aviculare L. prostrate knotweedPolygonum convolvulus L. wild buckwheatPolygonum lapathifolium L. pale persicariaPopulus balsamifera L. balsam poplarPopulus tremuloides Michx. trembling aspenPotamogeton natans floating pondweedPotamogeton pusillus L. slender pondweedPotamogeton richardsonii (A. Benn.) Rydb. Richardson's pondweedPotamogeton sp pondweed spPotentilla anserina L. silverweedPotentilla bipinnatifida Douglas ex Hook. plains cinquefoilPotentilla gracilis Douglas ex Hook. graceful cinquefoilPotentilla norvegica L. Norwegian CinquefoilPotentilla rivalis Nutt. brook CinquefoilPrunus pensylvanica L. f. pin cherryPrunus virginiana L. chokecherryPuccinellia nuttalliana (Schult.) Hitchc. nuttal's salt-meadow grass / nuttal's alkali grassRanunculus aquatilis var. diffusus With. white water crowfoot Ranunculus cymbalaria Pursh seaside buttercupRanunculus gmelinii DC. Gmelin's CrowfootRanunculus macounii Britton macoun's buttercup

Page 2 of 3

Page 89: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Scientific name Common name

Provincial

Designations1

Ranunculus sceleratus L. celery-leaved buttercup / cursed buttercupRhynchospora capillacea Torr. slender beak rushRibes oxyacanthoides L. northern gooseberryRorippa palustris (L.) Besser marsh yellow cressRosa acicularis Lindl. prickly roseRosa woodsii Lindl. common wild roseRumex occidentalis S. Watson western dockRumex pseudonatronatus Borbás field dockRumex crispus L. curly dockRumex salicifolius Weinm. narrow leaved dockRumex sp dock spSagittaria cuneata E. Sheld. arum-leaved arrow headsalix exigua Nutt. narrowlead willowScolochloa festucacea (Willd.) Link spangletopSchoenoplectus pungens var. pungens (Vahl) Palla three-square bulrushSchoenoplectus tabernaemontani (C.C. Gmel.) Palla common great bulrush / softstem bulrushSetaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. green foxtailSilene noctiflora night-flowering catchflySium suave Walter water parsnipSisyrinchium septentrionale northern blue-eyed grass S3?Solidago spp. goldenrodSolidago canadensis L. Canada goldenrodSolidago missouriensis Nutt. low goldenrodSolidago mollis Bartlett velvety goldenrodSolidago rigida ssp. humilis (Porter) S.B. Heard & Semple stiff goldenrodSonchus sp. sow thistle spSpiraea alba Du Roi narrow-leaved meadowsweet / narrow-leaved spireaStachys palustris L. marsh hedge-nettleStipa spp. needle and thread grassStuckenia pectinata (L.) Börner sago pondweedSymphoricarpos occidentalis Hook. western snowberrySymphyotrichum ciliatum (Ledeb.) G.L. Nesom rayless asterSymphyotrichum ericoides (L.) G.L. Nesom tufted white prairie asterSymphyotrichum lanceolatum var. hesperium (A. Gray) G.L. Nesom willow asterTanacetum vulgare L. common tansy NoxiousTaraxacum officinale ssp. officinale F.H. Wigg. dandelion NuisanceTephroseris palustris (L.) Reichenbach marsh ragwortThalictrum venulosum Trel. veiny meadowrueThlaspi arvense L. stinkweedTragopogon dubius Scop. goat's-beardTrifolium hybridum L. alsike cloverTrifolium sp clover spTriglochin maritima seaside arrow-grassTriticum durum Desf. durumTypha angustifolia L. narrow-leaved cattail S1?Typha latifolia L. common cattailUrtica dioica L. stinging nettleUtricularia vulgaris L. common bladderwortVeronica peregrina L. hairy speedwell1 S1; Extremely Rare, 5 or fewer occurrences in Saskatchewan, or very few remaining individuals S2; Rare, 6 to 20 occurrences in Saskatchewan or few remaining individuals S3; Rare to uncommon, 21 to 100 occurrences in Saskatchewan ?; means that there is some uncertainly with the ranking, either to do with the taxonomy of the species or the data the supports the ranking. Noxious and nuisance species, listed under The Weed Control Act (2010)

Page 3 of 3

Page 90: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Table C.3. Wildlife Species Observed within the Study Area

Species Code Scientific Name Common Name

Provincial

Rank1

COSEWIC

Designation2

SPSA Actitis macularius Spotted SandpiperRWBL Agelaius phoeniceus Red-winged BlackbirdLCSP Ammodramus leconteii LeConte's SparrowGRSP Ammodramus savannarum Grasshopper SparrowNSHO Anas clypeata Northern ShovelerBWTE Anas discors Blue-winged TealMALL Anas platyrhynchos MallardGADW Anas strepera GadwallSPPI Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit S3B ThreatenedAMBI Botaurus lentiginosus American BitternCANG Branta canadensis Canada GooseRTHA Buteo jamaicensis Red-tailed HawkKILL Charadrius vociferus KilldeerBLTE Chlidonias niger Black TernNOFL Colaptes auratus Northern FlickerAMCR Corvus brachyrhynchos American CrowCORA Corvus corax Common RavenBOBO Dolichonyx oryzivorus Bobolink S5B ThreatenedHOLA Eremophila alpestris Horned LarkBRBL Euphagus cyanocephalus Brewer's BlackbirdAMCO Fulica americana American CootWISN Gallinago delicata Wilson's SnipeCOYE Geothlypis trichas Common YellowthroatBARS Hirundo rustica Barn Swallow S5B ThreatenedFRGU Larus pipixcan Franklin's GullMAGO Limosa fedoa Marbled GodwitRUDU Oxyura jamaicensis Ruddy DuckSAVS Passerculus sandwichensis Savannah SparrowWIPH Phalaropus tricolor Wilson's PhalaropeEAGR Podiceps nigricollis Eared GrebeVESP Pooecetes gramineus Vesper SparrowSORA Porzana carolina SoraAMAV Recurvirostra americana American AvocetCCSP Spizella pallida Clay-coloured SparrowTRSW Tachycineta bicolor Tree SwallowGRYE Tringa melanoleuca Greater YellowlegsWILL Tringa semipalmata WilletEAKI Tyrannus tyrannus Eastern KingbirdYHBL Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus Yellow-headed BlackbirdUNDU Unknown duck species

UNMI Unknown minnow species

BCFR Pseudacris maculata Boreal chorus frogWOFR Rana sylvatica Wood Frog

WTDE Odocoileus virginianus White-tailed deerWTJA Lepus townsendii White-tailed jackrabbit1 S3B, Rare to uncommon, 21 to 100 occurrences in Saskatchewan. Rank applies to the breeding population in the province. S5B; Very common, more than 100 occurrences; widespread and abundant. Rank applies to the breeding population in the province.2 Threatened; A species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed.

Mammals

Amphibians

Fish

Birds

Page 1 of 1

Page 91: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY City of Saskatoon

APPENDIX D Wetland Functional Assessment Datasheet

Page 92: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

MNRAM 3.2 Wetland Assessment Data Form Page 1

worksheet.xls Vegetative Diversity Integrity 8/29/2012

Date:

Stewart & Kantrud Class, Cover Class: Sub: EC (µS): pH:

Phase: Normal Emergent Open-water Cropland Drawdown Cropland Tillage

Special Features (from list, p.2--enter letter/s)

#1 Community Number (circle each community which represents at least 10% of the wetland)

Zone (LPZ, WMZ, SMZ, DMZ, POZ)Community Proportion (% of total) Dominant Vegetation / Cover Class

Invasive/exotic Vegetation / Cover Class

Community Quality (E, H, M, L)Zone (LPZ, WMZ, SMZ, DMZ, POZ)Community Proportion (% of total) Dominant Vegetation / Cover Class

Invasive/exotic Vegetation / Cover Class

Community Quality (E, H, M, L)Zone (LPZ, WMZ, SMZ, DMZ, POZ)Community Proportion (% of total) Dominant Vegetation / Cover Class

Invasive/exotic Vegetation / Cover Class

Community Quality (E, H, M, L)Zone (LPZ, WMZ, SMZ, DMZ, POZ)Community Proportion (% of total) Dominant Vegetation / Cover Class

Invasive/exotic Vegetation / Cover Class

Community Quality (E, H, M, L)Zone (LPZ, WMZ, SMZ, DMZ, POZ) Zone: Zone: Zone: Zone:% vascular% non vascular% litter% bare ground% water

Photo ID

#4 Listed, rare, special plant species? Y#5 Rare community or habitat? Y#6 Pre-European-settlement conditions? 'Y

Comments:

N

13A, 13B, 12B, 15A, 15B, 16A, 16B

Natural Drawdown Emergent

NN

#45

Cover: Water temp:

Legal Land Location:

PC 2

PC 3

PC 4*

Wildlife

Wetland name / ID:

Drawdown bare-soil

#2 & #3 ~ Describe each community type individually below ~ ~ Describe each community type individually below ~

PC 1

Cover Class Class Range 1 0 - 3% 2 3 - 10% 3 10 - 25% 4 25 - 50% 5 50 - 75% 6 75 - 100%

Floodplain Forest [1A, 2A, 3A] * Hardwood Swamp [3B] * Coniferous Bog [2A, 4B] * Coniferous Swamp [4B] * Open Bog [1B, 5A, 5B, 6A, 7A, 9A, 10A] * Calcareous Fen [7B, 11B, 14A] * Shrub Swamp [6B] * Alder Thicket [8A] * Shrub-carr [8B] * Sedge Meadow [10B, 11A, 12A, 13A] * Shallow Marsh [13B] * Deep Marsh [12B] * Wet to Wet-Mesic Prairie [14B, 15A] * Fresh (Wet) Meadow [15B] * Shallow, Open Water [9B, 16A] * Seasonally Flooded Basin [16B]

*If there are more than four plant community types, use the next column over to enter the rest and do not rely on the automatic average calculations.

Page 93: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

MNRAM 3.2 Wetland Assessment Data Form Page 2

Italic questions are answered via GIS analyses or other methods in-office

worksheet.xls Function, Value, Restoration 8/29/2012

Date: # Question Description

7 Hydrogeomorphology and Topography (circle one)8 Maximum Water Depth (inches) : % inundation9 Local Watershed Area--immediate drainage (acres)

10 Estimated size of existing wetland (acres)11 SOILS: Upland/Wetland (survey classification + site)12 Outlet characteristics for flood retention A B C N/A13 Outlet characteristics for hydrologic regime A B C N/A14 Dominant upland land use (within 500 ft) A B C15 Soil condition (wetland) A B C 16 Vegetation (% cover)17 Emerg. veg. flood resistance A B C N/A18 Sediment delivery A B C19 Upland soils (based on soil group) A B C20 Stormwater runoff pretreatment & detention A B C21 Subwatershed wetland density A B C22 Channels/sheet flow A B C

23 Adjacent naturalized buffer, average width (feet)24 Adjacent area management (to 50 ft.)

(% of each, minimum 20%) Full__________% Bare__________%

25 Adjacent area diversity and structure (to 50 ft.) (% percent of each) Native__________% Sparse__________%

26 Upland area slope (to 50 ft.) (% in each category) Gentle________% Steep_________%

27 Downstream sensitivity/WQ protection A B C28 Nutrient loading A B C29 Shoreline wetland Y N30 Shoreline - rooted vegetation (% cover )

31 Shoreline - wetland in-water width (in feet, average)32 Shoreline - emergent veg. erosion resistance A B C33 Shoreline - erosion potential A B C34 Shoreline - bank protection/upslope veg. A B C35 Rare Wildlife Y N36 Scare/Rare/S1/S2 local community Y N37 Vegetation interspersion cover (see diagram 1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 N/A38 Veg. community interspersion (see diagram 2) 1 2 3 N/A39 Wetland detritus A B C N/A40 Wetland interspersion on landscape A B C41 Wildlife barriers A B C42 Amph. breeding potential - hydroperiod Adequate Inadequate43 Amphibian breeding potential - fish presence A B C44 Amphibian & reptile overwintering habitat A B C N/A46 Fish habitat quality E A B C N/A47 Fish species (list)48 Unique/rare educ./cultural/rec. opportunity Y N49 Wetland visibility A B C50 Proximity to population Y N51 Public ownership A B C52 Public access A B C53 Human influence on wetland A B C54 Human influence on viewshed A B C55 Spatial buffer A B C56 Recreational activity potential A B C57 Commercial crop--hydrologic impact A B C N/A58 GW - Wetland soils R D59 GW - Subwatershed land use R D60 GW - Wetland size and soil group R D61 GW - Wetland hydroperiod R D62 GW - Inlet/Outlet configuration R D63 GW - Surrounding upland topographic relief R D64 Restoration potential w/o flooding Y N65 Landowners affected by restoration all public 1 2 3+

66 A Existing wetland size (acres) [same as #10]66 B Total wetland restoration size (acres)66 C Potential new wetland area (acres)=B-A

67 Average width of naturalized upland buffer (potential)68 Ease of potential restoration A B C

69 Hydrologic alteration type70 Potential wetland type (Circ. 39) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 71 Wetland sensitivity to stormwater E A B C72 Additional stormwater treatment needs A B C

Outlet Tile Ditch GW pump Watershed div. Filling

Comments:

_____ acres_____ acres_____ acres_____ feet

____ feetManicured____________%

Mixed____________%

Moderate____________%

______ %

________ ft

____ %

Wetland ID:Rating

Depressional/Isolated Depress'l/Flow-through Depress'l/Tributary Riverine Lacustrine Peatland Floodplain Slope Other

:

Page 94: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY City of Saskatoon

APPENDIX E Natural Area Inventory of the North Swale

Page 95: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Table E.1. Vegetation Observed within the North Swale

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

WMZ

LPZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

WMZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

WMZ

DMZ

SMZ

WMZ

LPZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

WMZ

DMZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

DMZ

SMZ

WMZ

LPZ

Achillea millefolium L. common yarrow 1

Alisma subcordatum Raf.broad-leaved water plantain / water plantain 1

Alisma gramineum Lej. narrow-leaved water plantain (S3) 2

Beckmannia syzigachne (Steud.) Fernald slough grass 1

Bolboschoenus maritimus ssp. paludosus (A. Nelson) Á. Löve & D. Löve prairie bulrush 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 1

Brachythecium sp aquatic moss 1 3 4 6 6 6 3 2 4

Bromus inermis Leyss. smooth brome 2

Callitriche palustris L. water starwort 1

Carex atherodes Spreng. awned sedge 3 3 4 1 1 1 2 2 1

Carex rostrata Stokes beaked sedge 3

Carex pellita Muhl. ex Willd. wooly sedge 1 3

Carex praticola Rydb. meadow sedge 2 2 2 1 3 2 2

Carex sp sedge sp 1

Ceratophyllum demersum L. hornwort 2 1

Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Canada thistle 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 3

Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist Canada fleabane/ mares tail 1 1

Distichlis spicata (L.) Greene alkali grass 1 4 1 1 4 4 1 4 2 2

Eleocharis palustris (L.) Roem. & Schult. creeping spikerush 3 4 5 4 3 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 4 4 1 4 3 3 4 4 3 4

Eleocharis sp spikerush sp 3

Elymus repens (L.) Gould quack grass 1 5 1 2 1 4 3 2 2 5

Erigeron sp fleabane sp 1

Glyceria striata (Lam.) Hitchc. fowl mana grass 3 1 1 2

Glycyrrhiza lepidota Pursh. wild licorice 1

Grindelia squarrosa var. quasiperennis Lunell gumweed 2 2

Helianthus annus L. ssp. lenticularis (Lindl.) Cockerell common annual sunflower 1

Hieracium umbellatum L. hawkweed 1 1 1 1 2 2

Hordeum jubatum ssp. jubatum L. fox-tail barley 3 1 2 4 5 4 1 1 5 5 1 2 3 3 6 2 2 3 1 3 1 4 4

Juncus balticus Willd. baltic rush 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 4 2 3 1 2 3 1 3 3

Juncus sp rush sp 1 1Juncus subtilis E. Mey. slender rush 1 1

Lemna minor L. lesser duckweed 1 1 1 3

Lemna trisulca L. ivy-leaved duckweed 1 1 1 2

Leucanthemum vulgare Lam. oxeye daisy 1

Lycopus uniflorus Michx. northern horehound 2 1 3 1 1 3 2 3 2 2 3 1 2 4 1 2 2 1

Lysimachia maritima (L.) Galasso, Banfi & Soldano sea milkwort 3 1 2

Melilotus sp sweet clover   4 1 1

Mentha arvensis L. wild mint 2 1 1

Myriophyllum sibiricum Kom. northern milfoil, siberian water-milfoil 3 1 3 6 4 1 5 5

Persicaria amphibia (L.) Delarbre water smartweed 1

Phalaris arundinacea L. reed canarygrass 1 1 1 1 4 1

Poa sp bluegrass sp 3

Potamogeton natans floating pondweed 2 1 1 1

Potamogeton richardsonii (A. Benn.) Rydb. Richardson's pondweed 2

Potentilla anserina L. silverweed 1 3 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 2

Puccinellia nuttalliana (Schult.) Hitchc.nuttal's salt-meadow grass / nuttal's alkali grass 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 4 1

Ranunculus aquatilis var. diffusus With. white water crowfoot 2 1 1

Ranunculus cymbalaria Pursh seaside buttercup 2 3 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2

Ranunculus gmelinii DC. Gmelin's Crowfoot 2

Ranunculus sceleratus L.celery-leaved buttercup / cursed buttercup 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1

Scientific name Common name

5363 5364Wetland ID and Vegetation Zone1

5000 5001 5060 5061 5360 5361 5362

Page 1 of 2

Page 96: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

WMZ

LPZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

WMZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

WMZ

DMZ

SMZ

WMZ

LPZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

WMZ

DMZ

DMZ

DMZ

SMZ

SMZ

WMZ

DMZ

SMZ

WMZ

LPZ

Scientific name Common name

5363 5364Wetland ID and Vegetation Zone1

5000 5001 5060 5061 5360 5361 5362

Rumex crispus L. curly dock 2 1 1

Rumex salicifolius Weinm. narrow leaved dock 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

salix exigua Nutt. narrowlead willow 1 1

Scolochloa festucacea (Willd.) Link spangletop 1 2 1

Schoenoplectus pungens var. pungens (Vahl) Palla three-square bulrush 1 3 2 2 1 2 2

Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (C.C. Gmel.) Pallacommon great bulrush / softstem bulrush 4 3 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 5 2 3 6 6 5 3 2 4 2 3 1 4 2 1 4 4

Sium suave Walter water parsnip 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

Solidago spp. goldenrod 1

Solidago missouriensis Nutt. low goldenrod 1

Sonchus sp. sow thistle sp 3 4 3 2 1 2 2 2 4 1 2 4

Stipa spp. needle and thread grass 5

Stuckenia pectinata (L.) Börner sago pondweed 5 4 3 2 2 5 2 4 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 2 4 2

Symphoricarpos occidentalis Hook. western snowberry 1 1

Symphyotrichum ericoides var. pansum (S.F. Blake) G.L. Nesom many flowered aster 1 1 2

Symphyotrichum lanceolatum var. hesperium (A. Gray) G.L. Nesom willow aster 1 1 1

Tanacetum vulgare L. common tansy 1

Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinale F.H. Wigg. common dandelion 2 3

Triglochin maritima seaside arrow-grass 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 1 3 2 3 1 3 3 2 2 1 4

Typha angustifolia L. narrow-leaved cattail (S1?) 1 2

Typha latifolia L. common cattail 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 4 2 4 4 3 2 1 4 2 4 5Utricularia vulgaris L. common bladderwort 2 2

1 Vegetation Zones: DMZ, deep marsh zone; SMZ, shallow marsh zone; WMZ, wet meadow zone; LPZ, low prairie zone.2 Vegetation Cover Classes: 1=0-3%; 2=>3 to 10%; 3=>10 to 25%; 4=>25 to 50%; 5=>50 to 75%; and 6=>75 to 100%

Page 2 of 2

Page 97: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Table E.2. Wildlife Species Observed within the North Swale

Species Code Scientific Name Common Name

SPSA Actitis macularius Spotted SandpiperRWBL Agelaius phoeniceus Red-winged BlackbirdLCSP Ammodramus leconteii LeConte's SparrowNSHO Anas clypeata Northern ShovelerBWTE Anas discors Blue-winged TealMALL Anas platyrhynchos MallardAMBI Botaurus lentiginosus American BitternCANG Branta canadensis Canada GooseKILL Charadrius vociferus KilldeerBLTE Chlidonias niger Black TernHOLA Eremophila alpestris Horned LarkAMCO Fulica americana American CootWISN Gallinago delicata Wilson's SnipeCOYE Geothlypis trichas Common YellowthroatMAGO Limosa fedoa Marbled GodwitRUDU Oxyura jamaicensis Ruddy DuckSAVS Passerculus sandwichensis Savannah SparrowWIPH Phalaropus tricolor Wilson's PhalaropeEAGR Podiceps nigricollis Eared GrebeSORA Porzana carolina SoraAMAV Recurvirostra americana American AvocetGRYE Tringa melanoleuca Greater YellowlegsWILL Tringa semipalmata WilletYHBL Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus Yellow-headed Blackbird

UNMI Unknown minnow species

WTJA Lepus townsendii White-tailed jackrabbit

Birds

Fish

Mammals

Page 1 of 1

Page 98: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Table E.3. Sediment Quality within the North Swale

Natural Area ID 5060 5360 5364 ALS ID L1178713-1 L1178713-3 L1178713-2 Date Sampled 7/13/2012 12:00:00 PM 7/13/2012 2:50:00 PM 7/13/2012 3:45:00 PM

Units D.L. Guideline Sediment Sediment Sediment% 1 n/v 78.1 86.2 73.5% 0.1 n/v 35 31.7 56.7% 0.1 n/v 51.4 65.3 31.9% 0.1 n/v 13.6 3.03 11.4n/a n/a n/v Silt loam Silt loam Sandy loam

mg/kg 50 n/v 4450 5720 6540mg/kg 0.1 n/v 0.19 0.33 0.28mg/kg 0.1 5.9a 1.86 3.56 2.33mg/kg 1 n/v 90.9 71.7 81.9mg/kg 0.5 n/v <0.50 <0.50 <0.50mg/kg 1 n/v <1.0 <1.0 <1.0mg/kg 0.1 0.6a 0.26 0.32 0.21mg/kg 100 n/v 81600 59000 30000mg/kg 0.5 37.3a 7.95 9.53 11mg/kg 1 n/v 3 3.5 4mg/kg 1 n/v 31.1 58.9 11.8mg/kg 50 n/v 6270 8100 9420mg/kg 1 35a 5.2 7.7 11.8mg/kg 2 n/v 11.6 10.9 10.2mg/kg 100 n/v 15400 12300 6920mg/kg 1 n/v 393 229 225mg/kg 0.01 0.17a 0.031 0.077 0.028mg/kg 1 n/v <1.0 3.3 1mg/kg 1 n/v 8.5 12.4 10.6mg/kg 50 n/v 715 1050 595mg/kg 100 n/v 2220 2640 2340mg/kg 0.2 n/v 0.58 0.83 0.39mg/kg 0.2 n/v <0.20 <0.20 <0.20mg/kg 100 n/v 1020 1700 800mg/kg 1 n/v 305 204 110mg/kg 0.1 n/v <0.10 0.11 0.11mg/kg 2 n/v <2.0 <2.0 <2.0mg/kg 5 n/v 97.5 94.6 119mg/kg 0.1 n/v 1.24 3.27 1.48mg/kg 1 n/v 14 18.1 17.1mg/kg 5 123a 50 77.3 50.4Zinc (Zn)

Strontium (Sr)Thallium (Tl)Tin (Sn)Titanium (Ti)Uranium (U)Vanadium (V)

Nickel (Ni)Phosphorus (P)Potassium (K)Selenium (Se)Silver (Ag)Sodium (Na)

Lead (Pb)Lithium (Li)Magnesium (Mg)Manganese (Mn)Mercury (Hg)Molybdenum (Mo)

Cadmium (Cd)Calcium (Ca)Chromium (Cr)Cobalt (Co)Copper (Cu)Iron (Fe)

Aluminum (Al)Antimony (Sb)Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Beryllium (Be)Bismuth (Bi)

Analyte% Moisture% Sand (2.0mm - 0.05mm)% Silt (0.05mm - 2um)% Clay (<2um)Texture

Page 1 of 2

Page 99: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Natural Area ID 5060 5360 5364 ALS ID L1178713-1 L1178713-3 L1178713-2 Date Sampled 7/13/2012 12:00:00 PM 7/13/2012 2:50:00 PM 7/13/2012 3:45:00 PM

Units D.L. Guideline Sediment Sediment SedimentAnalytemg/kg 0.015 n/v <0.025 <0.030 <0.015mg/kg 0.03 n/v <0.050 <0.060 <0.030mg/kg 0.15 n/v <0.25 <0.30 <0.15mg/kg 0.3 n/v <0.50 <0.60 <0.30mg/kg 30 n/v <50 <60 <30mg/kg 30 n/v <50 <60 <30mg/kg 180 n/v <180 300 <180mg/kg 300 n/v <300 1030 <300mg/kg 300 n/v 980 7350 1480mg/kg 600 n/v 1350 13100 2660mg/kg 300 n/v 380 4380 890mg/kg 300 n/v 1360 12000 2370

n/a 0 n/v Yes Yes YesNotes:

a Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life - ISQGn/a Not applicablen/v No standard/guideline value

< 0.03 The analyte was not detected above the laboratory estimated quantitation limit. D.L. Detection Limit

Total Hydrocarbons (C6-C50)Chrom. to baseline at nC50

F1-BTEXF2 (C10-C16)TEH (C11-C22)F3 (C16-C34)TEH (C23-C60)F4 (C34-C50)

BenzeneEthylbenzeneTolueneXylenesF1 (C6-C10)

Page 2 of 2

Page 100: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY City of Saskatoon

APPENDIX F Recommended Wetland Management Classification System

Page 101: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

i

Recommended Wetland Management Classification System

To accompany the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions, Version 3.0

Table of Contents

1.0 Wetland Management Recommendations ...................................................................................... 1

1.1 Wetland Management Classification ..................................................................................... 1

1.1.1 Preserve ................................................................................................................. 4

1.1.2 Manage 1 ............................................................................................................... 4

1.1.3 Manage 2 ............................................................................................................... 5

1.1.4 Manage 3 ............................................................................................................... 6

1.2 Wetland Restoration Potential ............................................................................................... 6

1.3 Wetland Susceptibility to Stormwater Input .......................................................................... 6

1.4 Wetland Management Standards ........................................................................................... 7

1.4.1 Wetland Hydrology Standards ................................................................................... 7

1.4.2 Wetland Buffer Standards ......................................................................................... 9

1.4.3 Wetland Sequencing and Mitigation Standards ......................................................... 9

1.4.4 Stormwater Treatment Standards ............................................................................... 9

1.5 Best Management Practices ................................................................................................. 10

2.0 Critical Wetland Resources ......................................................................................................... 11

List of Tables

Table 1.1 Recommended Wetland Management Standards 3

Table 1.2 Susceptibility of Wetlands to Degradation by Stormwater Inputs 8

List of Figures

Figure 1.1 Basic Wetland Management Classification Process Flowchart 16

Figure 1.2 Increased Standard Wetland Management Classification Process Flowchart 17

Page 102: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 1

1.0 Wetland Management Recommendations

This document is a companion to the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions (MnRAM) [version 3.0 or later]. It is meant to provide a basis for developing wetland management recommendations from data gathered in the field. The objective of a wetland management classification system and management standards is to achieve no net loss of wetland functions and values within the management area while providing flexibility for economic development that may require wetland impacts. Impacts to wetlands include not only direct impacts such as filling, draining, and excavating, but also indirect impacts from stormwater inputs, changes to local surface and ground water hydrology, and pollutant loading.

The wetland protection process begins with an inventory and field assessment of all wetlands within the management area. The wetland inventory should identify wetlands by type (Circ. 39 or Cowardin), size, location and landscape setting, and wetland functions. Wetland assessment evaluates functional capacity, both existing and potential, based on inventory information as well as: vegetative community, soils, hydrology, ecologic characteristics, and cultural uses. Following completion of this assessment, each wetland can be assigned to a recommended management class based on the wetland’s current and potential functions as well as the evaluation of local critical wetland resources and the wetland’s susceptibility to stormwater degradation (Table 1.1). Each wetland can be classified according to a recommended level of wetland protection and acceptable hydrologic changes (Table 1.2).1

1.1 Wetland Management Classification

With data for each wetland in the assessment area complete, the functional indices can then be used to classify the wetlands. This guidance document presents two classification standards based on expert wetland recommendations and concepts2 and in compliance with the state Wetland Conservation Act3, state water quality standards4, and various wetland management plans from both metropolitan and rural Minnesota areas.

Suggested classification schemes offered are for Basic Protection and Increased Protection standards; local authorities can choose a management classification level based on local resource needs and preferences. The Basic Protection Standard (Figure 1.1) is the minimum recommended level that will satisfy no-net-loss goals, protect critical resources, and allow for use of some wetlands in development zones. The Increased Protection Standard will include more wetlands in the Preserve category that might otherwise fall into Manage 1, thereby protecting less-than-pristine wetlands in areas that are at an increased risk for wetland impact, whether direct; outright loss by development pressures or indirect; ecological impact from increased use or hydrologic changes.

1 Based largely on the state guidance document Storm-Water and Wetlands: Planning and Evaluation Guidelines for Addressing Potential Impacts of Urban Storm-Water and Snow-Melt Runoff on Wetlands, State of Minnesota Storm Water Advisory Group, 1997. 2 Some of which are presented in Storm-Water and Wetlands: Planning and Evaluation Guidelines for Addressing Potential Impacts of Urban Storm-Water and Snow-Melt Runoff on Wetlands, State of Minnesota Storm Water Advisory Group, 1997. 3 Minn. Rules Chap. 8420. 4 Minn. Rules Chap. 7050.

Page 103: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 2

These two options are offered as a starting point for regional decision-making. Any final policy will need to take into account how current and predicted pressures affect the landscape. An initial evaluation of the effect of both standards will give an indication how the local wetland manager can adapt an individual strategy to maximize resource protection while retaining development benefits to their community. Using GIS-mapping tools will be invaluable for this evaluation.

Using this system will classify a wetland into one of four categories: Preserve, Manage 1, Manage 2, or Manage 3. The Preserve category is for exceptional and highest-functioning wetlands or those sensitive wetlands receiving conveyed storm water runoff that have yet retained a medium level of vegetative diversity/integrity. These wetlands are those that should be preserved in (or improved to) their most pristine or highest functional capacity with wide, natural buffers, in perpetuity. In the Manage 1 category are high-quality wetlands that should be protected from development and other pressures of increased use, including indirect effects. Maintaining natural buffers will help to retain the significant function these wetlands provide. In the event that impacts to these wetlands cannot be avoided, replacement ratios for mitigation should exceed the state-required minimums. Manage 2 wetlands provide medium functional levels and the wetland extent should be maintained. These wetlands often provide optimal restoration opportunity. Manage 3 wetlands have been substantially disturbed; replacement considerations can be minimized5 after proper sequencing.

Using the Flowchart

The process can be followed in Figures 1.1 [Basic Standard] and 1.2 [Increase Protection Standard]. Begin at the top and follow the arrows and numbered boxes through the diagram until all of the wetlands have been placed in a management category. Find all wetlands that are classified as Critical Resources, as described in Section 2.0; those wetlands are classified in the Preserve category. Wetlands determined to not fit any of the Critical Resources categories are then classified into one of the four management class groups. The suggested wetland management criteria that could be applied to wetlands within each management class are provided in Table 1.1.

5 Replacement minimized down to a 1:1 ratio (in the counties with less than 50 percent of their historic wetlands) or lower (in counties with more than 50 percent of their historic wetlands).

Page 104: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 3

Table 1.1 Recommended Wetland Management Standards

Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions, Version 3.0

Management Class Management Strategy Stormwater Treatment Buffer1 Mitigation Standard Hydrologic Guidelines

A—Preserve Maintain wetland and existing functions, values and wildlife habitat. Possible need for active management of wetland to protect unique features. Apply strict avoidance standards. May be appropriate to develop a conservation easement.

Avoid conveyed flows where prudent and feasible. Upstream sediment and nutrient pretreatment required to maintain background loading rates. Maintain existing hydrology—divert increased flows. Avoid concentrating flows.

≥50 feet for water quality ≥100 feet for

wildlife habitat.2 Require

monuments to mark

buffer edge.

WCA minimum or greater replacement ratio with documented replacement of functions/values. Consider requiring buffer replacement.

Bounce (10 yr): Existing Inundation (1 & 2 yr): Existing (10 yr): Existing Runout Control:3 No Change Maintain existing hydrology. Encourage infiltration and reduced impervious BMPs. Conduct water budget analysis.

B—Manage 1 Maintain wetland without degrading existing functions, values and wildlife habitat. Apply WCA sequencing process.

Pretreat conveyed flows to maintain background loading rates.

35-50 feet

Require

monuments to mark

buffer edge.

WCA minimum or greater replacement ratio. Replacement of functions and values on site or in location specified in plan for drain/fill/excavation impacts. In compliance with Ch. 7050 the entire area affected by storm water or other wastewater flows must be avoided, minimized and replaced at a replacement ratio of 1:1 for all changes in wetland type.

Bounce (10 yr): Existing + 0.5 ft Inundation (1 & 2 yr): Existing plus 1 day (10 yr): Existing + 7 days Runout Control:2 No Change Maintain existing hydrology. Encourage infiltration and reduced impervious BMPs.

C—Manage 2 Maintain wetland footprint. Improve wetland biological and plant community diversity/integrity or enhance other functions if possible. Apply WCA sequencing process. Consider for restoration.

Pretreat all conveyed discharges to remove all heavy particles and maximize removal of fine grained sediment prior to discharging to the wetland

25-35 feet Require

monuments to mark

buffer edge.

WCA minimum replacement of acreage and functions/values on site or in location specified in plan for drain/fill/excavation impacts In compliance with Ch. 7050 the entire area affected by storm water or other wastewater flows must be avoided, minimized and replaced at a replacement ratio of 1:1 for all changes in wetland type.

Bounce (10 yr): Existing + 1.0 ft Inundation (1& 2 yr): Existing plus 2 days (10 yr): Existing + 14 days Runout Control: 2 0 to 1.0 ft above existing runout

D—Manage 3 Allow for relaxed sequencing and replacement plan flexibility. Consider for restoration/enhancement.

Pretreat all conveyed flows to remove all medium grained and larger sediments.

25 feet

WCA allows mitigation flexibility with minimum standards required in the plan area, see M.R. 8420.0650. In compliance with Ch. 7050 the entire area affected by storm water or other wastewater flows must be avoided, minimized and replaced at a replacement ratio of 1:1 for all changes in wetland type.

Bounce (10 yr): No Limit Inundation (1 & 2 yr): Existing plus 7 days (10 yr): Existing + 21 days Runout Control:2 0 to 4.0 ft above existing runout

1 Buffers are unmowed, naturalized strips of vegetation around the wetland perimeter. Buffers would be provided during development or redevelopment 2 Where possible, use 300-foot buffers as per MnRAM (Question #23). 3 If currently landlocked, new outlet should be above delineated wetland elevation.

Page 105: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 4

1.1.1 Preserve

Wetlands classified as Preserve have at least one of the following characteristics:

Wetlands rated with exceptional vegetative diversity/integrity, which may include wetlands with natural communities not significantly impacted by invasive species or other human-induced alterations, wetlands harboring endangered or threatened plant species, or rare wetland habitats classified as imperiled (S1) or critically imperiled (S2) by the state rankings.

Wetlands rated as exceptional for wildlife habitat. These include wetlands known to harbor endangered or threatened animal species, rare communities, or wildlife refuges and fish and wildlife management areas whose purpose is maintaining suitable habitats for wildlife.

Wetlands rated as high for amphibian habitat.

Wetlands rated as exceptional for fish habitat. These wetlands include those specifically managed for fish management; designated trout streams, lakes or adjacent wetlands; and known spawning habitat for game fish.

Wetlands rated high for shoreline protection. Wide wetlands bordering lakes and feeder streams that have persistent, emergent, submergent, or floating-leaved vegetation are critical to protecting the water quality of the lakes from bank erosion and sedimentation from upstream.

Wetlands rated exceptional for aesthetics/education/recreation/cultural and rated high for wildlife habitat, include those located on public lands that provide a unique or rare recreational, educational, or cultural opportunity, and have high functional level for wildlife since that is typically a primary focus for users.

Wetlands that are exceptionally sensitive to stormwater impacts and have a vegetative diversity/integrity rating of medium or higher were also placed in this category. These wetlands may have suffered some degradation from human influences due to their heightened sensitivity. The vegetative quality of the wetland is such that improved management may allow for restoration of the community.

Wetlands with a high vegetative diversity/integrity rating and a high rating for wetland water quality. The vegetative community in these wetlands typically has been only slightly affected by humans and still maintains high functioning to maintain water quality, which is critical to wetland sustainability.

Wetlands with a high vegetative diversity/integrity rating and a high rating for hydrologic regime. The vegetative community in these wetlands typically has been only slightly affected by humans and still maintains high functioning levels for hydrologic regime, which is critical to wetland sustainability.

1.1.2 Manage 1

Wetlands classified as Manage 1 have at least one of the following characteristics:

Wetlands rated with high vegetative diversity/integrity, which typically include diverse wetland plant communities with less than 20 percent cover of non-native or invasive species.

Page 106: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 5

Wetlands rated as high for wildlife habitat. These generally include wetlands located within large tracts of undeveloped land or in parks, which allow for wide high quality upland buffers. In addition, this includes seasonal wetlands that are well buffered.

Wetlands rated as medium for amphibian habitat. This includes seasonal wetlands that are well buffered.

Wetlands rated as high for fish habitat. These wetlands are lacustrine/riverine or are contiguous with a permanent waterbody or watercourse and provide spawning/nursery habitat, or refuge for native fish species in adjacent lakes, rivers or streams.

Wetlands rated medium for shoreline protection. These wetlands include those that are moderately wide and support persistent emergent, submergent, or floating-leaved vegetative cover bordering lakes and feeder streams.

Wetlands rated high for aesthetics/education/recreation/cultural and medium for wildlife habitat, include those that provide a number of benefits that may include: spatial buffering, accessibility, public ownership, multiple recreational opportunities, and medium-quality wildlife habitat.

Wetlands that are highly sensitive to stormwater impacts and have a vegetative diversity/integrity rating of medium or high were also placed in this category. The vegetative quality of the wetland is such that improved management may allow for restoration of the community.

Wetlands with a medium vegetative diversity/integrity rating and a high rating for wetland water quality. The vegetative community in these wetlands has only been moderately affected by humans and still maintains high functioning levels for water quality, which is critical to wetland sustainability. These wetlands would likely benefit from active management.

Wetlands with a medium vegetative diversity/integrity rating and a high rating for hydrologic regime were placed in the Manage 1 category. The vegetative community in these wetlands has only been moderately affected by humans and still maintains high functioning levels for hydrologic regime, which is critical to wetland sustainability. These wetlands would likely benefit from active management.

Wetlands rated high for commercial use. These wetlands provide important social value without having an altered hydrology.

1.1.3 Manage 2

Wetlands classified as Manage 2 have at least one of the following characteristics:

Wetlands rated with medium vegetative diversity/integrity, which typically include wetlands with less diversity and up to 50 percent cover of non-native or invasive species.

Wetlands rated as medium for wildlife habitat. These often include wetlands that are increasingly separated from natural communities and wildlife corridors; they often lack significant upland buffers and are increasingly altered.

Wetlands rated as low for amphibian habitat. These wetlands are increasingly altered, but they still have some opportunity to provide either breeding, over wintering, or resting habitat for amphibians.

Wetlands rated as medium for fish habitat. These wetlands include those which are intermittently connected to waterbodies supporting native fish populations

Page 107: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 6

Wetlands rated low for shoreline protection. While these wetlands are not providing the highest level of protection to the lake or river systems, their mere presence provides some level of protection that should not be dismissed. These wetlands are typically narrow, with little emergent, submergent, or floating-leaved vegetation.

Wetlands rated Medium for aesthetics/education/recreation/cultural and Low for wildlife habitat.

1.1.4 Manage 3

Wetlands classified as Manage 3 include all of the remaining wetlands that did not fit into any of the above-described conditions. All of these wetlands would rate low for vegetative diversity/integrity. Many of these wetlands rate medium or high for downstream water quality protection and for flood storage/attenuation. This correlation is expected since wetlands that provide higher levels of water quality treatment and runoff/rate control often suffer from ecological degradation.

1.2 Wetland Restoration Potential

Evaluate restoration potential of drained and partially drained wetlands in the field. The potential for wetland restoration is determined based on the ease with which the wetland could be restored considering factors including: the number of landowners within the historic wetland area, the size of the potential restoration area, the potential for establishing buffer areas or water quality ponding, the extent and type of hydrologic alteration, and the potential for flooding adjacent properties. Using those parameters, a functional rating of High, Medium, or Low is computed where High means that there will be fewer obstacles to completing a successful restoration.

1.3 Wetland Susceptibility to Stormwater Input

Stormwater runoff carries soil particles, nutrients, and contaminants that can change the ecological balance of the receiving water body. Changes in the volume, rate, frequency, or duration of stormwater entering or discharging from the water body can also change the ecological integrity. Alterations to the ecological integrity of a wetland often result in changes in the functional capacity, fish and wildlife habitat, replacement of native vegetation with invasive and disturbance-tolerant plant species, and/or other impacts to the wetland’s functions and values.

A methodology6 for determining the susceptibility of wetlands to degradation by stormwater input relates wetland type to a susceptibility level as shown in Table 1.2. Wetlands such as bogs and fens can easily be degraded by changes in the stormwater inflows and are designated as exceptionally susceptible. On the other hand, floodplain forests are more tolerant of changes in the frequency, magnitude and duration of flooding without degradation and are therefore classified as moderately susceptible. Shallow marshes and wet meadows dominated by hybrid cattail, reed canary grass, or other invasive/non-native species (see Table 1.2 and MNRAM 3.0) have a moderate susceptibility to stormwater fluctuations and inputs.

6 Storm-Water and Wetlands: Planning and Evaluation Guidelines for Addressing Potential Impacts of Urban Storm-Water and Snow-Melt Runoff on Wetlands (State of Minnesota Storm Water Advisory Group, 1997).

Page 108: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 7

1.4 Wetland Management Standards

Wetland management standards are proposed to maintain tolerable hydrologic and water quality changes in wetlands based on the goals stated for the management classifications. The recommended wetland management system (Table 1.1) presents a framework for management of storm water in and around wetlands as well as considering the regulation of impacts to wetlands and wetland mitigation; it is not meant to be used for specific wetland area designs. Replacement plans must also consider other laws that may apply, including local regulations, state Wetland Conservation Act rules, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 or other permit requirements. Additional investigations or evaluations, including detailed hydrologic modeling and modeling of nutrient loadings and removals, will need to be performed to determine final pipe sizes, pipe configuration, pipe elevations, pipe location, and site grading.

1.4.1 Wetland Hydrology Standards

Wetland hydrology management standards were developed7 to protect wetlands from hydrologic impacts. These standards present tolerable hydrologic changes in terms of bounce (difference between the peak flood elevation and the normal wetland elevation), inundation period (time that flood waters temporarily stored in the wetland exceed the normal wetland elevation), and runout control (elevation of the outlet). It is assumed that wetland impacts will be minimized and existing wetland functions and values will be maintained if these standards are implemented.

7 Standards shown in Table 1.1.

Page 109: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 8

Table 1.2 Susceptibility of Wetlands to Degradation by Stormwater Impacts8

Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions, Version 3.0

Exceptionally Susceptible Wetland

Types:1 Highly Susceptible

Wetland Types:2 Moderately

Susceptible Wetland Types:3

Least Susceptible Wetland Types:4

Sedge Meadows Shrub-carrsa Floodplain Forestsa Gravel Pits Open Bogs Alder Thicketsb Fresh (Wet) Meadowsb Cultivated Hydric Soils Coniferous Bogs Fresh (Wet) Meadowsc, e Shallow Marshesc Dredged Material/Fill

Material Disposal Sites Calcareous Fens Shallow Marshesd, c Deep Marshesc Low Prairies Deep Marshesd, c Lowland Hardwood Swamps

Seasonally Flooded Wetlands

1 Special consideration must be given to avoid altering these wetland types. Inundation must

be avoided. Water chemistry changes due to alteration by stormwater impacts can also cause adverse impacts. Note: All scientific and natural areas and pristine wetland should be considered in this category regardless of wetland type.

2 a., b., c. Can tolerate inundation from 6 inches to 12 inches for short periods of time. May be completely dry in drought or late summer conditions. d. Can tolerate +12 inches inundation, but adversely impacted by sediment and/or nutrient loading and prolonged high water levels. e. Some exceptions.

3 a. Can tolerate annual inundation of 1 to 6 feet or more, possibly more than once/year. b. Fresh meadows that are dominated by reed canary grass. c. Shallow marshes dominated by reed canary grass, cattail, giant reed, or purple loosestrife.

4 These wetlands are usually so degraded that input of urban storm water may not have adverse impacts.

Notes: There will always be exceptions to the general categories listed above. Use best professional judgment. A more complete description of wetland characteristics under each category is contained in Appendix A of the source (see footnote). Pristine wetlands are those that show little disturbance from human activity.

8 Adapted from: Storm-Water and Wetlands: Planning and Evaluation Guidelines for Addressing Potential Impacts of Urban Storm-Water and Snow-Melt Runoff on Wetlands, State of Minnesota Storm-Water Advisory Group, June 1997.

Page 110: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 9

1.4.2 Wetland Buffer Standards

Wetland buffer standards were developed with the focus on the buffer widths necessary for protecting water quality and for providing wildlife habitat. Suggested wetland buffer standards in Table 1.1 were developed based on a review of the scientific literature. The literature shows that the effectiveness of wetland buffers in removing sediments and nutrients from surface runoff varies widely due to many factors which include but are not limited to: slope, vegetative cover density, vegetation types, and width. Typically, buffers are established for their water quality improvement potential. High quality wildlife habitat requires significantly wider buffers and higher vegetative diversity/integrity.

Results from numerous studies on the effectiveness of buffers for improving water quality were compiled in a report prepared for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District9. This data suggests that buffer widths of 50 feet generally will provide adequate protection from suspended solids for maintaining high water quality.

The data for phosphorus removal shows a slightly stronger, although not statistically significant, trend. Buffers wider than 60 feet showed considerably greater total phosphorus reductions than narrower buffers (69 percent of those buffers reduced total phosphorus by more than 70 percent).

Another major function of wetland buffers is providing wildlife habitat. Recommendations in the literature for wetland buffer maintenance for optimal wildlife functions range from an absolute minimum of 50 feet up to 600 feet. In general, wider buffers are suggested as providing greater wildlife benefits. Reasonable wildlife benefits can be realized with the retention of 100-foot wide buffers. Several communities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area have enacted wetland buffer ordinances with required buffer widths up to 100 feet.

1.4.3 Wetland Sequencing and Mitigation Standards

The wetland sequencing and mitigation standards presented are suggestions based on interagency discussions and experiences with Comprehensive Wetland Management Plans. The goal of the recommended standards is to provide incentives to protect high quality wetland resources while realizing that low quality wetlands would not receive as stringent protection.

There are specific standards that must be met according to state and federal rules (WCA, 404, etc.). They can be varied by local plan and these management standards could serve as a basis, but not a substitute, for a local plan. Some management prescriptions suggested here could be implemented without a formalized local plan but all local, state, and federal rules would still apply. The COE could use these standards to vary replacement ratios on a case-by-case basis.

1.4.4 Stormwater Treatment Standards

Stormwater treatment management standards were developed to protect wetlands from water quality impacts. Various levels of pre-treatment of conveyed stormwater are recommended based on wetland management classification.

9 EOR, 2001

Page 111: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 10

1.5 Best Management Practices

A table of common best management practices (BMPs) is provided in the Comprehensive Guidance. It includes a description of the benefits of each, pollutants controlled, and some general construction requirements. A comprehensive selection and design manual10 for BMP usage in cold climates covers a total of 40 BMPs including:

Definition and description of the BMP

Discussion of the BMP’s means of operation

Diagrams and information to guide design and installation

Listing of inspection and maintenance considerations

References for more detailed information

A comprehensive guide11 to BMPs for protection and improvement of water quality in Minnesota includes the major principles and notable points relating to BMP practices. This is not a design manual. The BMP approaches are split into several categories including:

BMPs for Storm Water Systems Detention Ponds Erosion Protection and Sediment Control Pollution Prevention

In addition, the manual includes a section summarizing the attributes of various hydrologic models. Best management practices should be implemented to the extent feasible in all construction projects to maintain and prevent degradation of wetland functions and values.

10 The Minnesota Urban Small Sites BMP Manual – Stormwater Best Management Practices for Cold Climates, Metropolitan Council and Barr Engineering Co., 2001. 11 Protecting Water Quality in urban Areas – Best Management Practices for Dealing with Storm Water Runoff from Urban, Suburban, and Developing Areas of Minnesota, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 2000.

Page 112: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 11

2.0 Critical Wetland Resources

Wetlands in the assessment area should be evaluated for designation as critical resources based on several features defined in Minnesota Statutes. These critical wetland resources should be classified into the Preserve management class due to their special functions. Criteria for designating wetlands as critical resources are as follows:

Outstanding Resource Value Waters (Minn. Rules 7050.0180) Designated Scientific and Natural Areas (Minn. Rules 86A.05) Wetlands with known occurrences of Threatened or Endangered Species (Minn. Stat.

84.0895) State Wildlife Management Areas (Minn. Stat. 86A.05, subpart 8) State Aquatic Management Areas (Minn. Stat. 86A.05, subpart 14). Wellhead Protection Areas (Minn. Stat. 103I.101, MN Rules Chapter 4720). Sensitive Ground Water Areas (MN Rules 8420.0548, Subp. 6). Designated trout streams or trout lakes (MN Rules 6264.0050). Calcareous fens (MN Rules 8420.1010 through 8420.1060). High priority areas for wetland preservation, enhancement, restoration and establishment

(MN Rules 8420.0350, subpart 2). Designated Historic or Archaeological Sites State or federal designated wild and scenic rivers (MN Rule Chapter 7050)

2.1 Outstanding Resource Value Waters

"Outstanding resource value waters" are defined in MN Rules 7050.0180 as waters within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness; Voyageur's National Park; and Department of Natural Resources designated scientific and natural areas; wild, scenic, and recreational river segments; Lake Superior; those portions of the Mississippi River from Lake Itasca to the southerly boundary of Morrison County that are included in the Mississippi Headwaters Board comprehensive plan dated February 12, 1981; and other waters of the state with high water quality, wilderness characteristics, unique scientific or ecological significance, exceptional recreational value, or other special qualities which warrant stringent protection from pollution.

2.1.1 Calcareous Fens

Calcareous fens are defined in MN Rules 8420.1020 as peat-accumulating wetlands dominated by distinct groundwater inflows having specific chemical characteristics. The water is characterized as circumneutral to alkaline, with high concentrations of calcium and low dissolved oxygen content. The chemistry provides an environment for specific and often rare hydrophytic plants12. Minnesota Rules 8420.1010-1070 sets out minimum standards and criteria for the identification, protection, and management of calcareous fens as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.223. The MnDNR is charged with identifying and maintaining a list of calcareous fens in the state and maintains a database of them. Calcareous fens are also listed in the Classifications for Waters in

12 MN Rules 8420.1020

Page 113: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 12

Major Surface Water Drainage Basins13. Finally, the rules for Nondegradation of Outstanding Resource Value Waters14 also lists identified calcareous fens in the state.

2.1.2 Scientific and Natural Areas

State scientific and natural areas (SNA) are established to protect and perpetuate, in an undisturbed natural state, those natural features which possess exceptional scientific or educational value (MN Statutes 86A.05). This may include but is not limited to any of the following features: geological processes; significant fossil evidence, an undisturbed plant community, an ecological community significantly illustrating the process of succession and restoration to natural condition following disruptive change; a habitat supporting a vanishing, rare, endangered, or restricted species of plant or animal; a relict flora or fauna persisting from an earlier period; or a seasonal haven for concentrations of birds and animals, or a vantage point for observing concentrated populations, such as a constricted migration route. The area should embrace an area large enough to permit effective research or educational functions and to preserve the inherent natural values of the area.

2.1.3 Habitat for Designated Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern Species

Endangered and threatened plant and animal species are protected in Minnesota as specified in MN Statutes 84.0895. In MN Statutes, Subp. 3, species of wild animal or plant are designated as:

1. Endangered, if the species is threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range; or

2. Threatened, if the species is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range; or

3. Species of special concern, if although the species is not endangered or threatened, it is extremely uncommon in this state, or has unique or highly specific habitat requirements and deserves careful monitoring of its status.

In 1987, the Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) began a systematic survey of rare biological features. The goal of the MCBS is to identify significant natural areas and to collect and interpret data on the distribution and ecology of rare plants, rare animals, and native plant communities. The MCBS data for the assessment area (if available) should be examined for sites with medium, high and outstanding biologic diversity significance.

The MnDNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program (Natural Heritage Program) collects, manages, and interprets information about nongame animals, native plants, and plant communities to promote the wise stewardship of these resources. The Natural Heritage Program has developed a ranking system that is intended to reflect the extent and condition of natural communities and species in Minnesota.15 These ‘state ranks’ have no legal ramifications, they are used by the Natural Heritage Program to set priorities for research and for conservation planning. They are grouped as follows:

13 MN Rules 7050.0470 14 MN Rules 7050.0180, Subp. 6 15 Aaseng, N.E., J.C. Almendinger, R.P. Dana, B.C. Delaney, H.L. Dunevitz, K.A. Rusterholz, N.P. Sather, and D.S. Wovcha. 1993. Minnesota's Native Vegetation: A Key to Natural Communities, Version 1.5. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Biological Report No. 20. Natural Heritage Program.

Page 114: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 13

State Element Rank:

S1: Critically imperiled in the state because of extreme rarity (5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation from the state.

S2: Imperiled in state because of rarity (6 to 20 occurrences or few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation from the state.

S3: Rare or uncommon in state (on the order of 21 to 100 occurrences).

S4: Apparently secure in state with many occurrences.

S5: Demonstrably secure in state and essentially ineradicable under present conditions.

SH: Of historical occurrence in the state, perhaps having not been verified in the past 20 years, and suspected to be still extant.

SN: Regularly occurring, usually migratory and typically nonbreeding species for which no significant or effective habitat conservation measures can be taken in the state.

SR: Reported from the state, but without persuasive documentation which would provide a basis for either accepting or rejecting the report.

SRF: Reported falsely.

SU: Undetermined. Possibly in peril in the state but status uncertain; need more information.

SX: Extirpated within the state.

The Natural Heritage Program information database should be searched to determine if any endangered, threatened, or special concern species have been sighted within 500 feet of the assessment area. The list of species, the subwatershed location, legal protection status, state element rank and county should be compiled.

2.1.4 State Wildlife Management Areas

State wildlife management areas are established to protect those lands and waters which have a high potential for wildlife production and to develop and manage these lands and waters for the production of wildlife, for public hunting, fishing, and trapping, and for other compatible outdoor recreational uses16. State wildlife management areas satisfy the following criteria:

1. Includes appropriate wildlife lands and habitat, including but not limited to marsh or wetlands and the margins thereof, ponds, lakes, stream bottomlands, and uplands, which permit the propagation and management of a substantial population of the desired wildlife species; and

2. Includes an area large enough to ensure adequate wildlife management and regulation of the permitted recreational uses.

16 MN Statute 86A.05, subpart 8. A map of all MnDNR Wildlife Management Areas can be found at: www.dnr.state.mn.us/maps/compass.html.

Page 115: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 14

2.1.5 Designated Trout Streams and Lakes

Designated trout streams and lakes in the state of Minnesota are inhabited by trout other than lake trout. Fishing and other restrictions have been placed on these waterbodies to protect and foster the propagation of trout. Wetlands associated with these lakes are an integral part of the whole ecosystem that functions to maintain the characteristics necessary to support the fishery.

A list of all state trout streams and lakes can be found at: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/6264/.

2.1.6 Aquatic Management Areas

Minnesota Statutes 86A.05, Subpart 14, allows for the establishment of aquatic management areas to protect, develop, and manage lakes, rivers, streams, and adjacent wetlands and lands that are critical for fish and other aquatic life, for water quality, and for their intrinsic biological value, public fishing, or other compatible outdoor recreational uses. Aquatic management areas may be established to protect wetland areas under ten acres that are donated to the department of natural resources. Aquatic management areas must meet one or more of the following criteria:

1. Provides angler or management access;

2. Protects fish spawning, rearing, or other unique habitat;

3. Protects aquatic wildlife feeding and nesting areas;

4. Protects critical shoreline habitat; or

5. Provides a site for research on natural history.

2.1.7 Wellhead Protection Areas

Wellhead protection is defined as a method of preventing well contamination by effectively managing potential contaminant sources in all or a portion of the well’s recharge area. The statutory authority for wellhead protection comes from Minnesota Statutes 103I.101. The rules for establishment of Wellhead Protection Plans are found in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720, which are administered by the Minnesota Department of Health. Wetlands present within wellhead protection areas are likely to be predominantly recharge wetlands. Since wetlands typically collect surface water runoff from a larger upland area, recharge wetlands within wellhead protection areas have a greater probability of transmitting pollutants to a public groundwater supply than other wetlands. Wellhead protection plans are developed and implemented by the public water supplier, which is typically a city or the Minnesota Department of Health.

2.1.8 Sensitive Groundwater Areas

The Wetland Conservation Act requires that projects proposing to impact wetlands must evaluate whether the impacts would have an adverse impact on groundwater quality17. If it is determined that a proposed replacement plan would have a significant adverse impact on groundwater quality, the replacement plan must be denied. Wetlands determined to be primarily recharge wetlands as a result

17 Minnesota Rules 8420.0548, Subpart 6. The state rules governing wellhead protection can be accessed on the web at: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/4720/.

Page 116: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 15

of a functional assessment using MNRAM Version 3.0 should be evaluated for the potential to affect groundwater resources18.

2.1.9 High-Priority Areas for Wetland Preservation, Enhancement, & Restoration

Water management plans prepared by water management organizations in the metropolitan areas under Minnesota Statutes, section 103B.231 must identify those areas that qualify as high priority areas for wetland preservation, enhancement, restoration, and establishment19. These priority areas shall be included in the next scheduled water management plan update. Plans should give strong consideration to identifying as high priority areas, minor watersheds having less than 50 percent of their original wetland acreages, and intact wetlands, diminished wetlands, and the areas once occupied by wetlands that have been diminished or eliminated and could feasibly be restored taking into account the present hydrology and use of the area. Plans should give strong consideration to identifying as high priority areas all type 1 or 2 wetlands, and other wetlands at risk of being lost by permanent conversion to other uses. When individual wetlands are identified as high priority for preservation and restoration, the high priority area shall include the wetland and an adjacent buffer strip not less than 16.5 feet wide around the perimeter of the wetland and may include up to four acres of upland for each wetland acre.

Plans may identify additional high priority areas where preservation, enhancement, restoration, and establishment of wetlands would have high public value by providing benefits for water quality, flood water retention, public recreation, commercial use, and other public uses. High priority areas should be delineated by minor or major watershed.

2.1.10 State and Federal Designated Scenic and Wild Rivers

The rules for the protection of state designated scenic and wild rivers is set forth in Minnesota Rules Chapter 6105 as administered by the MnDNR20. Wild rivers are defined as those that exist in a free-flowing state with excellent water quality and with adjacent lands that are essentially primitive and scenic rivers are defined as those that exist in a free-flowing state with adjacent lands that are essentially primitive. Management plans must be developed before a river can be included in the wild and scenic river system. The plans must give emphasis to the preservation and protection of the area’s scenic, recreational, natural, historic, and similar values while placing no unreasonable restrictions upon compatible, preexisting, economic uses of particular tracts of land.

18 Evaluate according to the guidelines in: Criteria and Guidelines for Assessing Geologic Sensitivity of Ground Water Resources in Minnesota (MnDNR, 1991). 19 Minnesota Rules 8420.0350, Subp. 2 20 The state rules can be accessed at: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/6105/.

Page 117: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 16

Page 118: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Management Classification 17

Page 119: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

NORTH/NORTHWEST NATURAL AREA SCREENING STUDY City of Saskatoon

APPENDIX G Best Management Practices

Page 120: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Table G.1. Best Management Practices

Type of Practice Area of Benefit Storm Protection Benefit Pollutants Controlled Construction Requirements Nonstructural Source Controls Street Sweeping Street right-of-way.

Reduction in potential for clogging storm drains with debris. Some oil and grease control possible.

Paper and plastics, leaves and twigs, dust, and oil and grease. Acquire street sweeping equipment.

Sidewalk Cleaning Sidewalk right-of-way in areas of heavy foot traffic.

Reduction in pollutants entering storm drain. Oil and dirt. None.

Clean and Maintain Storm Drain Channels Annually

Channel capacity and receiving water. Upstream flood control benefits. Includes benefits to channel wildlife habitat and vegetation.

Prevent erosion in channel. Improve capacity by removing silt and sedimentation. Remove debris that is habitat destroying or toxic to wildlife.

Silt and sediment and the contaminants contained therein. Plastic, glass, paper, and metal thrown or washed in channel.

None.

Clean and Inspect Storm Inlets and Catch Basins Annually

Site dependent flood control benefits.

Allows proper drainage to prevent flooding and continued proper operation of facilities.

Silt and sediment and the contaminants contained therein. Plastic, glass, paper, and metal thrown or washed into facilities.

None.

Clean and Inspect Debris Basins Annually

Site dependent flood control benefits.

Allows proper drainage to prevent flooding and continued proper operation of facilities.

Silt and sediment and the contaminants contained therein. Plastic, glass, paper, and metal thrown or washed into facilities.

None.

Storm Drains Cleaned and Maintained Every 3 to 6 Years

Flood control and water quality benefits.

Allows proper drainage to prevent flooding and continued proper operation of facilities.

Silt and sediment and the contaminants contained therein. Plastic, glass, paper, and metal thrown or washed into facilities.

None.

Storm System Pump Stations Cleaned and Maintained Annually

Site dependent flood control and water quality benefits.

Prevents flooding and allows continued proper operation of facilities.

Silt and sediment and the contaminants contained therein. Plastic, glass, paper, and metal thrown or washed into facilities.

None.

Inspect and Maintain Sewer System

Storm drain system and receiving water.

Prevents and eliminates sewer system surcharges.

Contaminants, toxics, and coliform bacteria. None.

Minor Structural Source Controls Storm Drain Inlet Protection Storm drain drainage area. Prevent debris from entering storm

drain. Dirt, leaves, twigs, paper, plastic, and other incidentals. Not available.

Outlet Protection Storm drain receiving water. Prevent erosion at the outlet of pipes or paved channels and protect downstream water quality.

Turbidity and sediment. Structural apron lining at the outlet location. Made of riprap, grouted riprap, concrete, or other structural materials.

Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control Measures

Site and topography dependent. Reduce silt and sediment load to storm drains.

Silt and sediment and the contaminants therein. None.

Interceptor Swale Dependent on flow velocity. Max. velocity for earth channel is 6 fps. Max. velocity for vegetated or riprap channel is 8 fps.

Shorten length of exposed slopes and intercept and divert storm runoff from erodible areas.

Sediment and silt and the contaminants contained therein.

Excavation drainageway across disturbed areas or rights-of-way.

Page 121: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Type of Practice Area of Benefit Storm Protection Benefit Pollutants Controlled Construction Requirements

Improve and Maintain Natural Channels

Channel capacity and receiving water. Upstream flood control benefits. Includes benefits to channel wildlife habitat and vegetation.

Prevent erosion in channel. Improve capacity by removing silt and sedimentation. Remove debris that is habitat destroying or toxic to wildlife.

Silt and sediment and the contaminants contained therein. Plastic, glass, paper, and metal thrown or washed in channel.

None.

Diversion Channel

Dependent of flow velocity. Maximum velocities: 5 fps for vegetated channel and 8 fps for riprap channel. Not for use on slopes greater than 15%. Drainage area should be 5 acres or less.

Intercept and convey runoff to outlets at nonerosive velocity. Sediment and erosion controls. Lined drainageway of trapezoidal cross

section.

Grass-Lined Channel Site dependent but of larger capacity than interceptor or perimeter swales.

Intercept runoff and convey runoff from site.

Sediment and silt and the contaminants contained therein.

Excavation of channel or improvements to natural channel. Stabilization with vegetation.

Storm Drain Drop Inlet Protection Areas less than 1 to 2 acres.

Filters sediment from runoff before it enters inlet. Provides relatively good protection.

Sediment and the contaminants contained therein.

Barrier around storm drain inlet. Useful for areas where storm drain is operational before area runoff area is stabilized.

Riprap Site dependent Provides stabilization and erosion control for stream banks and channels, outlet, and slopes.

Erosion and sediment. Placement of rock on area to be stabilized. May also require use of filter fabric liner.

Gabions Site dependent Provides stabilization and erosion control for stream banks, outlet, and slopes.

Erosion and sediment. Placement of wire cage will with rocks over area to be stabilized. May also require use of filter fabric liner.

Vegetative Control Applicable and effective for most sites.

Provides stabilization and erosion control for streambanks, swales, channels, outlets, slopes, open disturbed areas. Can be up to 99% effective with established cover. Temporary seeding can be up to 90% effective.

Erosion and sediment.

Site preparation (can include land leveling and installation of irrigation system), seeding or planting, and netting or mulching to establish seed. Can also include other sodding, ground cover, shrubs, trees, and native plants.

Filter Strips Site dependent. Receives overland flow slowing runoff and trapping particulates. Can be 30 to 50% effective for sediment control.

Silt, sediment, trash, organic matter, and to an extent, soluble pollutants through infiltration.

Grading and vegetative establishment. Should have a minimum width of 15 to 20 feet. Good performance is achieved with a 50 to 75 foot width.

Fence Open Channels Site dependent. Prevent windblown trash from entering channel. Prevents illegal dumping in channel.

Trash and pollutants. Construction of fences.

Discharge Elimination Methods

French Drains and Subsurface Drains

Dependent on site topography and soil permeability.

Provides drainage of “wet” soils to allow establishment of vegetation. Can reduce runoff.

Sediment. Underground perforated pipe leading to a surface water outlet. Pipe size, bedding and depth is dependent on site conditions.

Page 122: North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of ... · North/Northwest Natural Area Screening Study, City of Saskatoon Prepared for: City of Saskatoon Planning and Development

Type of Practice Area of Benefit Storm Protection Benefit Pollutants Controlled Construction Requirements

Infiltration Trench and Dry Well

Small drainage areas. Runoff from rooftops, parking lots, residential, etc.

Provides temporary storage of runoff and infiltration to soil. Not for use in areas where groundwater could become contaminated.

Prevents 100% of pollutants from entering surface water. Oil, grease, floating organic matter, and settleable solids should be removed before water enters trench.

Excavation of a shallow trench 2’ to 10’ deep. Backfilled with coarse stone aggregate.

Exfiltration Trench Site dependent. Prevent silting on underlying filter gravel or rock bed. Retain first flush, reduce runoff volume and peak discharge rate and promote water quality improvement.

Prevents pollutants from entering surface water. Oil, grease, floating organic matter, and settleable solids should be removed before water enters trench.

Uses perforated pipe with suitable membrane filter material. Installed before receiving water outlet or in groundwater recharge area.

Porous Pavement Site dependent. Requires relatively flat surface.

Allow infiltration of surface runoff. Reduce runoff volume and pollutant loadings from low volume traffic areas.

Oil and grease. Install porous pavement. May require twice as much paving material as standard asphalt to achieve same strength.

Retention Basin Best for sites of 5 to 50 acres. Promotes infiltration to groundwater and reduces runoff volume and velocity. Filters pollutants.

Sediment, trace metals, nutrients, and oxygen-demanding substances.

Excavation of a basin over permeable soils. Size is site dependent. Depth is 3 to 12 feet.

Floatables and Oil Removal Clarifiers and Oil and Water Separators on Parking Structures

Parking lot structure and receiving water.

Collect debris before it can enter storm drain.

Oil, grease, and antifreeze from vehicles and foods and food wrappers.

Install grit and separators.

Oil and Grit Separators Site dependent. For heavy traffic areas or areas with high potential for oil spills.

Remove pollutants. Sediments and hydrocarbons. Install oil and grit separators on storm drains.

Sediment/Grease Trap Installed on storm drain inlets. Intercept and trap sediment and grease from runoff. Sediment, oil, and grease. Install sediment and grease traps.

Solids Removal

Detention Basin Four acres of drainage area for each acre/foot of storage provided to retain a permanent pool of water.

Temporary storage of storm runoff until release. Can also improve water quality.

Sediment, trace metals, hydrocarbons, nutrients, and pesticides.

Excavation of a basin over soils which will cause excessive seepage. May require a liner. Can be used aesthetically as a small pond in landscaping.

Extended Detention Basin

Size for a minimum detention time of 24 hours.

Temporary storage of runoff for an extended period of time. Can improve water quality.

Sediment, trace metals, hydrocarbons, nutrients, and pesticides.

Excavation of a basin over soils which will cause excessive seepage. May require a liner. Can be used aesthetically as a small pond in landscaping.

Bar Screens Site dependent. Restrict passage of objects which may obstruct pump station suction bays. Large debris. Install bar screens before pump station

suction bays. Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. 2010b.