North Shore City - Land Transport New Zealand · 2010. 7. 19. · North Shore City Road Safety...

Per fo rmance In fo rmat ion NZ T ranspor t Agency P r i va te Bag 106602 Leve l 11 HSBC House 1 Queen S t AUCKLAND 1143 Ph . (09) 969 9800 Fax . (09) 969 9813 Web: www.nz ta .gov t .nz

June 2010

RRRRRRNorth Shore City Road Safety Report

2005 to 2009

Blank pageContents Page Introduction and general information 1 Crash rates and costs (Figures 1.1 to 1.11) 5 Crash counts (Figures 2.1 to 2.14) 17 Road user statistics (Figures 3.1 to 3.28) 25 Crash type statistics (Figures 4.1 to 4.6) 41 Crash factor statistics (Figures 5.1 to 5.14) 47 Environmental statistics (Figures 6.1 to 6.14) 57 Date and time statistics (Figures 7.1 to 7.3) 67 Council road statistics (Figures 8.1 to 8.26) 71 Crash location statistics (Figures 9.1 to 9.5) 89

Appendices Grouping of crash types Groupings of contributing factors

List of figures Crash rates and costs page 5

Fig. 1.1 Reporting rate serious injuries to hospital admissions

Fig. 1.2 Crashes per 100 million vehicle kilometres travelled

Fig. 1.3 Casualties per 100 million vehicle kilometres travelled

Fig. 1.4 Peer group crash and casualty rates Group A

Fig. 1.5–1.8 Crashes per 100 million vehicle kilometres travelled on:

Urban council roads Group A

Rural council roads Group A

Urban state highways Group A

Rural state highways Group A

Fig. 1.9 Crashes per 10,000 people (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 1.10 Casualties per 10,000 people (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 1.11 Social cost of crashes in North Shore City in 2009

Crash counts page 17

Fig. 2.1 Crash numbers and severity (2005 to 2009) – whole city/district

Fig. 2.2, 2.3 Crash numbers and severity (2005 to 2009) – urban/rural

Fig. 2.4 Casualty numbers and severity (2005 to 2009) – whole city/district

Fig. 2.5, 2.6 Casualty numbers and severity (2005 to 2009) – urban/rural

Fig. 2.7 Number of injury crashes (2000 to 2009) – all roads

Fig. 2.8 Number of casualties (2000 to 2009) – all roads

Fig. 2.9 Number of injury crashes (2000 to 2009) – urban

Fig. 2.10 Number of casualties (2000 to 2009) – urban

Fig. 2.11 Number of injury crashes (2000 to 2009) – rural

Fig. 2.12 Number of casualties (2000 to 2009) – rural

Fig. 2.13, 2.14 Severity ratio (2000 to 2009) – urban/rural

Road user statistics page 25

Fig. 3.1, 3.2 Road user casualties (2005 to 2009) – urban/rural

Fig. 3.3, 3.4 Male/female casualties (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 3.5 Male casualties by age (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 3.6 Female casualties by age (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 3.7, 3.8 Car/van driver casualties (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 3.9, 3.10 Car/van passenger casualties (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 3.11, 3.12 Heavy vehicle casualties (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 3.13, 3.14 Motorcyclist casualties (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 3.15, 3.16 Pedestrian casualties (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 3.17, 3.18 Cyclist casualties (2000 to 2009)

List of figures continued

Road user statistics page 25

Fig. 3.19 Car/van driver casualty age (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 3.20 Car/van passenger casualty age (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 3.21 Heavy vehicle casualty age (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 3.22 Motorcyclist casualty age (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 3.23 Pedestrian casualty age (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 3.24 Cyclist casualty age (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 3.25, 3.26 Casualty ethnicity (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 3.27, 3.28 Licence status (2000 to 2009)

Crash type statistics page 41

Fig. 4.1, 4.2 Crash movement type (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 4.3, 4.4 Crash movement type – trends (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 4.5 Failed to give way/stop – urban (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 4.6 Bend – lost control/head on – rural (2000 to 2009)

Crash factor statistics page 47

Fig. 5.1, 5.2 Contributing factors (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 5.3–5.6 Contributing factor trends – urban (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 5.7 Alcohol-involved trend – urban (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 5.8 Speed-involved trend – urban (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 5.9–5.12 Contributing factor trends – rural (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 5.13 Alcohol-involved trend – rural (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 5.14 Speed-involved trend – rural (2000 to 2009)

Environmental statistics page 57

Fig. 6.1, 6.2 Crashes not on state highways (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 6.3, 6.4 Intersection crashes (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 6.5, 6.6 Wet road crashes (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 6.7, 6.8 Crashes in darkness (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 6.9 Unsealed road crashes – rural (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 6.10 Icy road crashes – rural (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 6.11, 6.12 Collisions with objects (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 6.13, 6.14 Objects struck (2005 to 2009)

Date and time statistics page 67

Fig. 7.1 Time pattern over average week (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 7.2 Day of week (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 7.3 Month of year (2005 to 2009)

List of figures continued Council road statistics page 71

Fig. 8.1 Number of injury crashes (2000 to 2009) – all council roads

Fig. 8.2 Number of casualties (2000 to 2009) – all council roads

Fig. 8.3 Number of injury crashes (2000 to 2009) – urban council roads

Fig. 8.4 Number of casualties (2000 to 2009) – urban council roads

Fig. 8.5 Number of injury crashes (2000 to 2009) – rural council roads

Fig. 8.6 Number of casualties (2000 to 2009) – rural council roads

Fig. 8.7, 8.8 Crash movement type – council roads (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 8.9, 8.10 Crash movement type – trends – council roads (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 8.11 Failed to give way/stop – urban council roads (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 8.12 Bend – lost control/head on – rural council roads (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 8.13, 8.14 Contributing factors – council roads (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 8.15, 8.16 Intersection crashes – council roads (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 8.17, 8.18 Wet road crashes – council roads (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 8.19, 8.20 Crashes in darkness – council roads (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 8.21 Unsealed road crashes – rural council roads (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 8.22 Icy road crashes – rural council roads (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 8.23, 8.24 Collisions with objects – council roads (2000 to 2009)

Fig. 8.25, 8.26 Objects struck – council roads (2005 to 2009)

Crash location statistics page 89

Fig. 9.1 Urban crash blackspot list for the City (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 9.2 Rural crash blackspot list for the City (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 9.3 State Highway crash blackspot list for the City (2005 to 2009)

Fig. 9.4 Urban crash blackspots with a significant increase in crashes in 2009

Fig. 9.4a Rural crash blackspots with a significant increase in crashes in 2009

Fig. 9.5 State highway crash blackspots with a significant increase in crashes in 2009

North Shore City Road Safety Report 2005-2009

Introduction and general information 1

Introduction and general information

The NZ Transport Agency provides information on road safety to its stakeholders and the

public. It also has responsibility for promoting safety and sustainability in land transport,

among a variety of other functions. This road safety report is an example of information

supplied by the NZ Transport Agency.

This report helps identify road safety issues in North Shore City area (‘the city’) by

presenting tables or graphs of:

• numbers and trends in reported crashes and casualties

• characteristics and types of crashes and casualties

• factors contributing to crashes

• locations with bad crash records

• characteristics of crashes on council authority roads

The information is intended to assist road controlling authorities, the New Zealand Police

and others in evaluating the safety performance of the road network in North Shore City.

Comparison with other cities, districts or regions elsewhere in the country is included.

Researchers, students, and organisations with an interest in road safety will also find the

information useful. Source of crash information This report uses data from the NZ Transport Agency’s crash database. This database

includes all crashes involving injury and non–injury for which Police reports have been

completed and forwarded to the NZ Transport Agency. Mostly five-year data (2005 to

2009) has been used, but 10-year data (2000 to 2009) has been used to analyse trends.

Council authority peer groups Traffic crash patterns and features for an area can depend on the traffic and roading

characteristics of that area. The most useful comparisons are made with other areas or

authorities with similar characteristics, rather than with the whole country. The data for the

city is compared with a peer group of similar council authorities (Group A) along with data

for all New Zealand.

The peer group used for comparison with North Shore City is Group A which consists of

major urban areas with some rural areas on the outskirts. (Population over 100000 and/or

rural crashes less than 30 percent). Council authorities included in this group are listed in

Figure 1.4.



Definitions of urban and rural Data has been separated for urban and rural (open) roads through this report because each

has a distinctly different pattern of crashes. In this report urban roads are defined as all

those with a speed limit of 70 km/h or less, however it should be noted that some locations

which have been speed limit zoned might be more appropriately defined as rural but are

included in urban zones. Definition of statistically significant A number of graphs include a comparison between the road controlling authority, all

New Zealand and a similar peer group. These graphs can include an indication as to

whether the difference is statistically significant. For the purposes of this report statistically

significant means that a difference of this size is unlikely to be due to chance. Significance

is noted at the 5% level (P < 0.05), this means that the observed result would occur by

chance in only 1 in 20 similar situations.

Road user compliance data The Ministry of Transport collects information on road user compliance with traffic law. This

information includes speed surveys, occupant restraint use surveys and cycle helmet use

surveys. Information about these surveys is available on Ministry of Transport web site.

The appropriate web addresses are as follows:

Speed Surveys http://www.transport.govt.nz/research/SpeedSurveys/

Safety belts http://www.transport.govt.nz/research/safetybeltstatistics/

Cycle helmets http://www.transport.govt.nz/research/cyclehelmets2009/

The information is also distributed quarterly in the Ministry of Transport publication Road

safety progress.

The Ministry of Transport also conducts public attitude surveys. These have been

undertaken annually since 1994. They evaluate attitudes to road safety issues, primarily

alcohol-impaired driving and speed. Surveys are carried out in May and June of each year

by trained interviewers who conduct interviews with respondents in their homes. The

sample is chosen to be representative of the New Zealand adult population, and includes

men and women aged 15 and over from towns, cities and rural areas throughout

New Zealand.



The results of these surveys are available from:

http://www.transport.govt.nz/research/PublicAttitudestoRoadSafety-Survey/

General explanatory notes

1. Crash and casualty information in this report generally includes data for both council

roads and state highways. Some tables and charts can separate this information,

however figures 8.1–8.26 provide information for council roads only.

2. Crash and casualty rates are based on 2009 populations estimates updated from the

2006 census, traffic flows from the year 2009, and the average of five year crash data

(2005–2009).

3. Traffic flows are based on Road Asset Maintenance and Management (RAMM) data from

December 2009. As different road controlling authorities update flow data in RAMM at

different times some data will be more up to date than other data, hence caution

should be exercised when comparing traffic flow based crash rates in one authority

with those of other authorities particularly as the traffic flow data (VKT) used in the

calculations can not be considered definitive. Comparisons should be considered as

indicative only.

4. With four to five categories of road for each council authority, some categories will only

have short lengths of road. This may cause significant variation in the calculated crash

and casualty rates.

5. The crash numbers include all those within the road controlling authority. The crash

numbers used in the crash rate section can, however, vary slightly from the remainder

of the document as only ‘on road’ crashes can be used. These are crashes on roads

that have traffic volume information recorded. Crashes that occurred in car parks,

reserves, beaches etc. are excluded.



6. The severity of a crash is determined as the most severely injured casualty in the

crash. Injury severity is classified as fatal, serious, or minor as follows:

Fatal: Injuries that result in death within 30 days of a crash.

Serious: Fractures, concussion, internal injuries, crushing, severe cuts and

lacerations, severe general shock necessitating medical treatment, and

any injury involving removal to and detention in hospital.

Minor: Injuries which are not serious but which require first aid, or cause

discomfort or pain to the person injured, eg sprains and bruises.

7. Ethnicity of road users involved in crashes can now be recorded on traffic crash reports,

although some reports may not include this data. Figures 3.25 and 3.26 shows the

ethnicity of casualties, where known. Ethnicity is divided into five different groups. Only

data for 2005 to 2009 is available. The graph includes all casualties irrespective of

culpability.

NOTE: Ethnicity data should be treated with caution as the data can be considered

subjective and incomplete.

8. For the licence status grouping in Figures 3.27 and 3.28 the ‘no/wrong licence’ group

includes drivers who have never held a licence or have an expired or wrong class

licence. This graph includes all drivers irrespective of injury or culpability.

9. See appendix for detailed descriptions of:

• crash movement types and crash movement groupings (for Figures 4.1–4.4)

• grouping of factors contributing to crashes (for Figures 5.1–5.14)

10. Blackspot sites listed in Figures 9.1 and 9.3 are listed by the total cost of crashes at the

site and are listed regardless of any remedial treatments. Site were initially selected

on the basis of 3 reported crashes and then the sites listed were limited to those with a

higher number of injury crashes and over a defined social cost, which is indicated on

each figure.

11. Alarm crash sites in section 9 as Figures 9.4 to 9.6 are crash sites that have shown a

statistically significant increase (at the 95 percent level of confidence) in reported

crashes in 2009 compared with the previous five years (2004 to 2008). The sites are

initially selected on the basis of 3 or more reported crashes at the sites. Sites are listed

regardless of any recent remedial treatments and they may already be under

investigation for treatment.


Crash Rates and Costs

6 Crash Rates and Costs


Figure 1.1 Reporting rate serious injuries to hospital admissions

Region 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

30% 28% 34% 38% 27%17% 20% 16% 18% 18%40% 38% 50% 47% 40%32% 37% 38% 29% 27%32% 26% 31% 28% 27%80% 75% 59% 68% 42%55% 65% 79% 41% 36%38% 34% 35% 36% 31%68% 61% 74% 55% 48%44% 52% 54% 50% 39%53% 55% 59% 53% 54%47% 42% 49% 45% 43%99% 85% 77% 69% 39%78% 103% 73% 53% 39%36% 35% 37% 35% 33%

OtagoSouthlandNew Zealand

WellingtonNelson-MarlboroughWest CoastCanterbury

GisborneHawkes BayTaranakiManawatu-Wanganui

NorthlandAucklandWaikatoBay of Plenty

Crash reporting rates

The ratio of ‘reported serious injuries’ can be assessed by comparing seriously injured casualty numbers from Police crash reports to hospital admissions, given that a serious injury is generally one requiring hospital attention.

Figure 1.1 below indicates the serious injury reporting rate for each region.

This is the ratio of the number of persons with serious injuries in reported crashes divided by the number of persons admitted to hospital with serious injuries.

These variations in reporting rates need to be considered when viewing the trends in crashes and casualties shown in this report.

Note: These values should be considered indicative only.



Figure 1.4 Peer group crash and casualty rates

Group A

City or District Urb

an

Rura

l

Urb

an

Rura

l

Urb

an

Rura

l

Urb

an

Rura

l

Auckland 26 32 74 54 15 33 40 111 71 19 444100 21Christchurch 25 42 23 27 19 32 52 31 35 25 372600 9Dunedin 40 83 67 63 19 57 118 95 91 32 123700 24Hamilton 23 40 46 20 37 29 50 56 25 55 140700 10Hutt 21 32 299 128 15 26 39 406 147 19 102100 23Manukau 18 30 33 57 13 24 40 46 82 19 368600 22North Shore 19 31 32 54 14 24 39 46 66 19 225800 20Tauranga 15 24 * 11 15 19 29 * 14 24 112600 14Waitakere 20 44 15 20 18 26 57 22 25 23 204500 16Wellington 23 51 29 50 13 28 59 29 66 18 195500 15

Group A 23 37 33 31 15 30 47 46 40 21 2290200 17All New Zealand 131 38 29 28 18 36 48 42 38 26 4331000 41

* due to small numbers of rural crashes values are not considered meaningful

Crashes per Casualties per 100 million vehicle kilometres travelled

100 million vehicle kilometres travelled

Council roads

State Highways

Council roads

State Highways

10,0

00 P

opula

tion

(5 y

ear

aver

age)

10,0

00 P

opula

tion

(5 y

ear

aver

age)

20

09

Popula

tion

% o

f ru

ral cr

ashes

Group A : Major urban areas with some rural areas on the outskirts. (Population > 97500 and/or rural crashes less than 30 percent).Crashes and casualties per 100 million VKT are based on five years of reported injury on-road crash data (2005-2009) and December 2009 VKT estimates. Crashes and casualties per 10,000 population are based on five year average crash data (2005-2009) and Statistics NZ 2009 population estimates.



Figure 1.5 Crashes per 100 million vehicle-kilometres travelled - urban council roads

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Tauranga

Manukau

North Shore

Hutt

Auckland

Group A

All New Zealand

Hamilton

Christchurch

Waitakere

Wellington

Dunedin

Crashes per 100 million vkt



Figure 1.6 Crashes per 100 million vehicle-kilometres travelled - rural council roads

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Waitakere

Christchurch

Wellington

All New Zealand

North Shore

Manukau

Group A

Hamilton

Dunedin

Auckland

Hutt

Tauranga




Figure 1.7 Crashes per 100 million vehicle kilometres travelled - urban state highways

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Tauranga

Hamilton

Waitakere

Christchurch

All New Zealand

Group A

Wellington

Auckland

North Shore

Manukau

Dunedin

Hutt




Figure 1.8 Crashes per 100 million vehicle-kilometres travelled - rural state highways

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Wellington

Manukau

North Shore

Auckland

Tauranga

Group A

Hutt

All New Zealand

Waitakere

Christchurch

Dunedin

Hamilton




Figure 1.9 Crashes per 10,000 peopleNorth Shore City

191921

232223

1917

1918

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

Cra

shes

per

10,

000

peop

le

All NZ North Shore Group A

Figure 1.10 Casualties per 10,000 peopleNorth Shore City

2422

24 25

29 29 29

26

2324

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

Cas

ualti

es p

er 1

0,00

0 pe

ople




Figure 1.11 Social cost of crashes in North Shore City in 2009

urbanruralurbanrural

Note: Crash costs are in $ millions

State Highways

Total

$1,607.40$909.43

Council roads$80.27$2.71

$299.76$1,487.35$4,303.94

New Zealand

$116.27

$3.09$30.19

North Shore City

The social costs of a road crash and the associated injuries include a number of different elements:

• Loss of life and life quality• Loss of output due to temporary incapacitation• Medical costs• Legal costs• Property damage costs

The average value of a loss of life due to a road crash is estimated by the amount of money the New Zealand population would be willing to pay for a safety improvement that would result in the expected avoidance of one premature death. This is the willingness to pay based value of statistical life or VOSL. The VOSL was established at $2 million in 1991. This has been indexed to the average hourly earnings (ordinary time) to express the value in current dollars. The updated VOSL is $3.5 million (in June 2009 dollars). Based on several international and New Zealand studies on VOSL, the average loss of life quality for permanent impairments due to a serious and a minor injury were estimated to be 10% and 0.4% of the VOSL respectively.

Crash rates can vary due to reporting rates. These are adjusted on a regional basis in this report by comparing with hospitalisation rates.

The other social cost components are estimated based on a number of studies conducted during the early to mid-1990s and are updated for price changes by indexing to an appropriate price index.

For a detail discussion on this, please refer to ‘The social cost of road crashes and injuries: June 2009 update’, available at the Ministry of Transport’s website: http://www.transport.govt.nz/assets/NewPDFs/NewFolder/Social-Cost-June-2009-update-final.pdf

The average social cost per reported crash (in June 2009 dollars) are estimated at:

Rural fatal crash $4,260,000 Rural serious crash $820,000 Rural minor crash $91,000 Urban fatal crash $3,775,000 Urban serious crash $699,000 Urban minor crash $82,000 These values include an allowance for non-reported injury crashes, and the totals in Fig. 1.11 also include an allowance for non–injury crashes.



Crash Counts

19 Crash Counts


20 Crash Counts


Figure 2.1: Crash numbers and severity 2005 to 2009 - whole City

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total % Group AFatal crashes 3 6 4 3 6 22 1% 1%Serious crashes 63 56 44 33 48 244 11% 15%Minor crashes 395 413 399 380 368 1955 88% 84%Total injury crashes 461 475 447 416 422 2221 100% 100%Non-injury crashes 1578 1557 1598 1432 1359 7524

Figure 2.2: Crash numbers and severity 2005 to 2009 - urban roads


Figure 2.3: Crash numbers and severity 2005 to 2009 - rural roads


Figure 2.4: Casualty numbers and severity 2005 to 2009 - whole City

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total % Group AFatal casualties 3 6 4 4 6 23 1% 1%Serious casualties 67 60 47 35 63 272 10% 13%Minor casualties 517 551 509 450 455 2482 89% 86%Total casualties 587 617 560 489 524 2777 100% 100%

Figure 2.5: Casualty numbers and severity 2005 to 2009 - urban roads


Figure 2.6: Casualty numbers and severity 2005 to 2009 - rural roads


21 Crash Counts


Figure 2.8 Number of casualtiesNorth Shore City all roads (urban & rural)

457421

457481

575 587617

560

489524

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

asua

lties

MinorSeriousFatal

Figure 2.7 Number of injury crashesNorth Shore City all roads (urban & rural)

334 327358

373

459 461475

447416 422

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

rash

es

MinorSeriousFatal

22 Crash Counts


Figure 2.9 Number of injury crashesNorth Shore City - urban

322337

358

389382381

298314

262276

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

rash

es

MinorSeriousFatal

Figure 2.10 Number of casualtiesNorth Shore City - urban

383394

443

504473474

367394

333

375

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

asua

lties

MinorSeriousFatal

23 Crash Counts


Figure 2.12 Number of casualtiesNorth Shore City - rural

8288

63

114

101

114 113 117

95

141

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

asua

lties

MinorSeriousFatal

Figure 2.11 Number of injury crashesNorth Shore City - rural

5865

44

75 7879

86 89

79

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

rash

es

MinorSeriousFatal

24 Crash Counts


Figure 2.13 Severity ratio - urbanNorth Shore City

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

YearNote: This graph depicts the percentage of serious injury crashes (including those which resulted in death) to all

injury crashes.

% o

f all

inju

ry c

rash

es


Figure 2.14 Severity ratio - ruralNorth Shore City

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

YearNote: This graph depicts the percentage of serious injury crashes (including those which resulted in death) to all

injury crashes.

% o

f all

inju

ry c

rash

es


25 Crash Counts


26 Crash Counts


Road User Statistics

27 Road User Statistics


Figure 3.1 Road user casualties - urbanNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

**

*

*

217

178

194

39

337

1226

**

*

*

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Car/van drivers

Car/van passengers

Heavy vehicles

M/cyclists

Cyclists

Pedestrians

% of urban casualtiesNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points.

*Denotes statistically significant difference between Local Authority and National or Peer Group Proportions

Group ANorth Shore All NZ

Figure 3.2 Road user casualties - ruralNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

*

*

**

**

415

111

17

33

2

2

*

*

*

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Car/van drivers

Car/van passengers

Heavy vehicles

M/cyclists

Cyclists

Pedestrians

% of rural casualtiesNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points.





Figure 3.4 Male/female casualties - ruralNorth Shore City

43

50

34

60 60

54

60

76

39 37

28

53

40

5962

57

39

61

5155

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year

Note: This graph shows the number of male and female roadusers injured.

No.

of c

asua

lties

MaleFemale

Figure 3.3 Male/female casualties - urbanNorth Shore City

211

169

206

176

243258

278

243

222212

160 162

187 189

230212

221

198

171 166

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year

Note: This graph shows the number of male and female roadusers injured.

No.

of c

asua

lties

MaleFemale



Figure 3.6 Female casualties by ageNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%< 5

5-9

10-1415-1920-2425-2930-3435-3940-4445-4950-5455-5960-6465-6970-7475-7980+

Age (years)Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points.

The graph plots the percentage of Roaduser Casualties by age.

% o

f fem

ale

casu

altie

s


Figure 3.5 Male casualties by ageNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

12 24

45

278252

144114 110 109 108

64 6643

20 22 22 30

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

< 5

5-9

10-1415-1920-2425-2930-3435-3940-4445-4950-5455-5960-6465-6970-7475-7980+


The graph plots the percentage of Roaduser Casualties by age.

% o

f mal

e ca

sual

ties




Figure 3.7 Car/van driver casualtiesNorth Shore City

292

300328

378343

356290260235250

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

YearNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points

% o

f all

casu

altie

s


Figure 3.8 Car/van driver casualtiesNorth Shore City

235260

290

356343

378

328300 292

250

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

YearNote: Dotted line represents the ten year trend line

No.

of c

asua

lties



Figure 3.9 Car/van passenger casualtiesNorth Shore City

100

7283 90 106 103

11494

54

83

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

YearNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points.

% o

f all

casu

altie

s


Figure 3.10 Car/van passenger casualtiesNorth Shore City

100

72

8390

106 103

114

94

54

83

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


No.

of c

asua

lties



Figure 3.11 Heavy vehicle casualtiesNorth Shore City

12

9

13

1111

7

9

66

10

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

YearNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points.

% o

f all

casu

altie

s


Figure 3.12 Heavy vehicle casualtiesNorth Shore City

10

6 6

9

7

11 11

13

9

12

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


No.

of c

asua

lties



Figure 3.14 Motorcyclist casualtiesNorth Shore City

23 24 2327

19

36 36

56

45

54

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


No.

of c

asua

lties

Figure 3.13 Motorcyclist casualtiesNorth Shore City

54

4556

3636

19

2723

2423

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year

Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points.

% o

f all

casu

altie

s




Figure 3.15 Pedestrian casualtiesNorth Shore City

5050

39

34

46

5344

6255

41

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year


% o

f all

casu

altie

s


Figure 3.16 Pedestrian casualtiesNorth Shore City

41

55

62

44

53

46

3439

50 50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

YearNote: Dottedline represents the ten year trend line

No.

of c

asua

lties



Figure 3.17 Cyclist casualtiesNorth Shore City

3228

2120

34

48

41

29

30 32

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year


% o

f all

casu

altie

s


Figure 3.18 Cyclist casualtiesNorth Shore City

3228

21 20

34

48

41

29 3032

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


No.

of c

asua

lties



Figure 3.19 Car/van driver casualty ageNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

243452

8869

0 1 0

249267

180160

144 154 136

2741

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

< 5 5-9 10-1415-19

20-2425-29

30-3435-39

40-4445-49

50-5455-59

60-6465-69

70-7475-79

80+


The population line show the age distribution for the TLA being analysed.

% o

f car

/van

driv

er c

asua

lties

All NZ North Shore Group A Population

Figure 3.20 Car/van passenger casualty ageNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

14101189117

18

61714

34

70

117

2519

11

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

< 5 5-9 10-1415-19

20-2425-29

30-3435-39

40-4445-49

50-5455-59

60-6465-69

70-7475-79

80+


The population line shows the age distribution for the TLA being analysed.

% o

f car

/van

pas

seng

er c

asua

lties




Figure 3.21 Heavy vehicle casualty ageNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

2 2

0

4

5

2 2

10

3

8

5

4

7

0 0 0 00%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

< 5 5-9 10-1415-19

20-2425-29

30-3435-39

40-4445-49

50-5455-59

60-6465-69

70-7475-79

80+



% o

f hea

vy v

ehic

le c

asua

lties


Figure 3.22 Motorcyclist casualty ageNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

234

1014

0 1 2

35

58

2126

1619

15

0 00%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

< 5 5-9 10-1415-19

20-2425-29

30-3435-39

40-4445-49

50-5455-59

60-6465-69

70-7475-79

80+



% o

f mot

orcy

clis

t cas

ualti

es




Figure 3.24 Cyclist casualty ageNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

02

00

79

1614

2019

1617

11

15

23

20

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

< 5 5-9 10-1415-19

20-2425-29

30-3435-39

40-4445-49

50-5455-59

60-6465-69

70-7475-79

80+



% o

f cyc

list c

asua

lties


Figure 3.23 Pedestrian casualty ageNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

13

5

8

56

11

75

18

28

32

17

6

1

10 11

14

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

< 5 5-9 10-1415-19

20-2425-29

30-3435-39

40-4445-49

50-5455-59

60-6465-69

70-7475-79

80+



% o

f ped

estr

ian

casu

altie

s




Figure 3.25 Casualty ethnicity - urbanNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

*

*

*

*

*29

191

40

74

481*

*

*

*

*

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

European

Maori

Pacific Islander

Asian

Other

% of all casualties Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.



Figure 3.26 Casualty ethnicity - ruralNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

*

*

*

*

*

5

46

12

13

237

*

*

*

*

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

European

Maori

Pacific Islander

Asian

Other

% of all casualties Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.





Figure 3.28 Licence status - ruralNorth Shore City

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year

Note: This graph shows drivers by licence status as % of all drivers involved in injury crashes.

% o

f all

driv

ers

invo

lved

in in

jury

cr

ashe

s

Learner/Restricted No/Wrong Licence Forbidden/DisqualifiedFull Licence Unknown Overseas

Figure 3.27 Licence status - urbanNorth Shore City

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year

Note: This graph shows drivers by licence status as % of all drivers involved in injury crashes.

% o

f all

driv

ers

invo

lved

in in

jury

cra

shes

Learner/Restricted No/Wrong Licence Forbidden/DisqualifiedFull Licence Unknown Overseas



Crash Type Statistics

43 Crash Type Statistics


Figure 4.1 Crash movement type - urbanNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

*

*

19

147

310

482

576

181

73

*

*

*

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Miscellaneous

Straight -lostcontrol/head on

Bend -lostcontrol/head on

Rear end /obstruction

Crossing / Turning

Pedestrian vs vehicle

Overtaking

% of urban crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.



Figure 4.2 Crash movement type - ruralNorth Shore City roads (2005-2009)

*

*

*

*

*

2

55

40

274

13

2

47

*

*

*

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Miscellaneous




Crossing / Turning

Pedestrian vs vehicle

Overtaking

% of rural crashes Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.





Figure 4.3 Crash movement type - trendsNorth Shore City - urban roads

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

rash

es

Overtaking Straight -lost control/head on Bend -lost control/head on Rear end / obstruction Crossing / Turning Pedestrian vs vehicle

Figure 4.4 Crash movement type - trendsNorth Shore City - rural roads

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year

No.

of c

rash

es




Figure 4.6 Bend - lost control / head - onNorth Shore City - rural roads

19

8 7

3 6 7 6

10 9 8

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

YearNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.

% o

f rur

al c

rash

esbe

nd/lo

st c

ontr

ol/h

ead

on


Figure 4.5 Failed to give way / stopNorth Shore City - urban roads

959794

117121

1038194

61

74

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f urb

an c

rash

esfa

iled

to g

ive

way

/sto

p




69

Crash Factor Statistics

49 Crash Factor Statistics


69

Figure 5.1 Contributing factors - urbanNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

*

*

*

*

*

*

699 172

54 63

129 46 48

150 76

228

198 524

53 29

166 196

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Alcohol involved

Too fast

Failed to g.w./stop

Failed to keep left

Over-taking

Incorrect lanes/position

Poor handling

Poor observation

Poor judgement

Fatigue

Disabled/old/ill

Pedestrian factors

Cyclist factors

Vehicle factors

Road factors

Weather

% of urban crashesNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.



Figure 5.2 Contributing factors - ruralNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

48159

8

412

5237

1240

1702

1011

38178

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Alcohol involved

Too fast

Failed to g.w./stop

Failed to keep left

Over-taking


Poor handling

Poor observation

Poor judgement

Fatigue

Disabled/old/ill

Pedestrian factors

Cyclist factors

Vehicle factors

Road factors

Weather

% of rural crashesNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points.





Figure 5.3 Contributing factor trendsNorth Shore City - urban roads

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of u

rban

cra

shes

Alcohol involved Too fast Failed to g.w./stop Fatigue


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of u

rban

cra

shes

Poor observation Poor judgement Pedestrian factors Road factors




0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of u

rban

cra

shes

Cyclist factors Incorrect lanes/position

Vehicle factors Failed to keep left


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of u

rban

cra

shes

Poor handling Over-taking

Disabled/old/ill Weather



Figure 5.7 Alcohol involved trendNorth Shore City - urban roads

43

39

54

52

40403234

23

37

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f urb

an c

rash

es in

volv

ing

alco

hol


Figure 5.8 Speed involved trendNorth Shore City - urban roads

2830

43

49

47

40

52

40

33 33

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f urb

an c

rash

es in

volv

ing

spee

d




Figure 5.9 Contributing factor trendsNorth Shore City - rural roads

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of r

ural

cra

shes

Alcohol involved Too fast Road factors Fatigue


0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of r

ural

cra

shes

Failed to g.w./stop Poor handling

Poor judgement Failed to keep left




0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of r

ural

cra

shes

Vehicle factors Incorrect lanes/position Poor observation Over-taking


0

1

2

3

4

5

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of r

ural

cra

shes

Weather Disabled/old/ill

Pedestrian factors Cyclist factors



Figure 5.13 Alcohol involved trendNorth Shore City - rural roads

8

53

1

7

4

9

7 6

11

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f rur

al c

rash

es in

volv

ing

alco

hol


Figure 5.14 Speed involved trendNorth Shore City - rural roads

18

1610

10

17

1113

3

15

10

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f rur

al c

rash

es In

volv

ing

spee

d




69

Environmental Statistics

59 Environmental Statistics


69

Figure 6.1 Crashes not on state highwaysNorth Shore City - urban roads

312

320265

256

299 284 360 359 365342

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f urb

an c

rash

es n

ot o

n St

ate

Hig

hway

s


Figure 6.2 Crashes not on state highwaysNorth Shore City - rural roads

56

1112

765

57

9

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year

Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.

% o

f rur

al c

rash

es n

ot o

n St

ate

Hig

hway

s




Figure 6.3 Intersection crashesNorth Shore City - urban roads

160172187

220

176183

152155126

141

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f urb

an c

rash

es a

t int

erse

ctio

ns


Figure 6.4 Intersection crashesNorth Shore City - rural roads

9

10

8

11

66

17

11

11

7

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year

Note: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.

% o

f rur

al c

rash

es a

t int

erse

ctio

ns




Figure 6.5 Wet road crashesNorth Shore City - urban roads

737982

104

78

987976

85

68

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f urb

an c

rash

es o

n w

et ro

ads


Figure 6.6 Wet road crashesNorth Shore City - rural roads

19

27

20

30

2628

28

21

24 29

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f rur

al c

rash

es o

n w

et ro

ads




Figure 6.8 Crashes in darknessNorth Shore City - rural roads

40

2424

29

3131

20

22

23

24

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f rur

al c

rash

es in

dar

knes

s


Figure 6.7 Crashes in darknessNorth Shore City - urban roads

103

93

128132

1231249097

7486

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f urb

an c

rash

es in

dar

knes

s




Figure 6.9 Unsealed road crashesNorth Shore City - rural roads

0 0 0 0 0

1

0 0 0 00%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f rur

al c

rash

es o

n un

seal

ed ro

ads


Figure 6.10 Icy road crashesNorth Shore City - rural roads

000000

1

0000%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f rur

al c

rash

es o

n ic

y ro

ads




Figure 6.11 Collisions with objectsNorth Shore City - urban roads

107100

11785

7965

82

116

9078

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% u

rban

col

lisio

ns in

volv

ing

fixed

obj

ects


Figure 6.12 Collisions with objectsNorth Shore City - rural roads

16

232525

16

24

17

1316

29

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% ru

ral c

ollis

ions

invo

lvin

g fix

ed o

bjec

ts




Figure 6.13 Objects struck - urbanNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

*

*

*

*

0

26

14

102

13

110

195

25

86

2

7

0

87

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%

Animals

Bridge

Cliff/bank

Over bank

Fence/building

Guardrail

Island/sign/kerb

Parked vehicle

Other

Poles

Roadworks

Trees

Ditch




Figure 6.14 Objects struck - ruralNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

0

5

7

7

1

13

2

10

4

60

5

9

8

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16%

Animals

Bridge

Cliff/bank

Over bank

Fence/building

Guardrail

Island/sign/kerb

Parked vehicle

Other

Poles

Roadworks

Trees

Ditch

% of rural crashesNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.





69

Date and Time Statistics

69 Date and Time Statistics

71

Date a

nd T

ime Sta

tistics

North

Shore

City

Road S

afe

ty R

eport 2

00

5-2

00

9Figure 7.1 Time pattern over average week

North Shore City (2005-2009)

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12 00 12

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

% of Total C

rashes



69

Figure 7.2 Day of week (6 a.m. to 6 a.m.)North Shore City (2005-2009)

*

259

298

400388

349

309279

*

**

*

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

DayNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.


% o

f tot

al c

rash

es

Group A North Shore All NZ

Figure 7.3 Month of yearNorth Shore City (2005-2009)

165

200

180167

202203186

208199

211

165

135

**

**

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

MonthNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of crashes is shown against the data points.


% o

f tot

al c

rash

es

Group A North Shore All NZ



69

Local Road Statistics

73 Local Road Statistics


Figure 8.2 Number of casualtiesNorth Shore City - council roads (urban & rural)

374

336

386355

451 451

488

443

387 379

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

asua

lties

MinorSeriousFatal

Figure 8.1 Number of injury crashesNorth Shore City - council roads (urban & rural)

317326

353377

366366

289304

263274

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

rash

es

MinorSeriousFatal



Figure 8.3 Number of injury crashesNorth Shore City - urban council roads

312320342

365359360

284299

256265

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

rash

es

MinorSeriousFatal

Figure 8.4 Number of casualtiesNorth Shore City - urban council roads

363

324

377349

444 442474

426

375 371

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

asua

lties

MinorSeriousFatal



Figure 8.6 Number of casualtiesNorth Shore City - rural council roads

1112

9

67

9

14

17

12

8

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

asua

lties

MinorSeriousFatal

Figure 8.5 Number of injury crashesNorth Shore City - rural council roads

5

6

11

12

7

6

55

7

9

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

rash

es

MinorSeriousFatal



Figure 8.8 Crash movement type - ruralNorth Shore City council roads (2005-2009)

*

*

*

*

3

2

5

7

21

1

2

*

*

*

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Miscellaneous




Crossing / Turning

Pedestrian vsvehicle

Overtaking



Group A LRNorth Shore LRAll NZ LR

Figure 8.7 Crash movement type - urbanNorth Shore City council roads (2005-2009)

*

*

19

142

304

454

533

179

67

*

**

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Miscellaneous




Crossing / Turning

Pedestrian vsvehicle

Overtaking






Figure 8.9 Crash movement type - TrendsNorth Shore City - urban council roads

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

rash

es


Figure 8.10 Crash movement type - TrendsNorth Shore City - rural council roads

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year

No.

of c

rash

es




Figure 8.12 Bend - lost control / head - onNorth Shore City - rural council roads

7

3

5

3

3 4

6 5

4

2

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f rur

al c

rash

esbe

nd/lo

st c

ontr

ol/h

ead

on

All NZ LR North Shore LR Group A LR

Figure 8.11 Failed to give way/stopNorth Shore City - urban council roads

8990

87

111113

9574

93

58

70

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f urb

an c

rash

esfa

iled

to g

ive

way

/sto

p




Figure 8.13 Contributing factors - urbanNorth Shore City council roads (2005-2009)

**

*

*

*

*

*

663 158

52 61

128

43 46

147

76

223

192 490

53

26 151

191

*

*

**

*

*

*

*

*

*

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Alcohol involved

Too fast

Failed to g.w./stop

Failed to keep left

Over-taking


Poor handling

Poor observation

Poor judgement

Fatigue

Disabled/old/ill

Pedestrian factors

Cyclist factors

Vehicle factors

Road factors

Weather




Figure 8.14 Contributing factors - ruralNorth Shore City council roads (2005-2009)

*

*

93

1

36

126

09

10

2

01

610

*

*

*

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Alcohol involved

Too fast

Failed to g.w./stop

Failed to keep left

Over-taking


Poor handling

Poor observation

Poor judgement

Fatigue

Disabled/old/ill

Pedestrian factors

Cyclist factors

Vehicle factors

Road factors

Weather

% of rural crashesNote: While the graph plots percentages, the number of casualties is shown against the data points.





Figure 8.16 Intersection crashesNorth Shore City - rural council roads

0

3

33

1

2

1

0

3

1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% ru

ral c

rash

es a

t int

erse

ctio

ns


Figure 8.15 Intersection crashesNorth Shore City - urban council roads

151158173

201

164166140145

121132

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% u

rban

cra

shes

at i

nter

sect

ions




Figure 8.17 Wet road crashesNorth Shore City - urban council roads

66

83

7788

7573

100

80 77 71

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% u

rban

cra

shes

on

wet

road

s


Figure 8.18 Wet road crashesNorth Shore City - rural council roads

1

24

4

1

4

4

3

22

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% o

f rur

al c

rash

es o

n w

et ro

ads




Figure 8.19 Crashes in darknessNorth Shore City - urban council roads

8271

90 87116 117

126124

89

99

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% u

rban

cra

shes

in d

arkn

ess


Figure 8.20 Crashes in darknessNorth Shore City - rural council roads

4 3

3

0

34

6

4

3

2

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% ru

ral c

rash

es in

dar

knes

s




Figure 8.21 Crashes on unsealed roadsNorth Shore City - rural council roads

0 00

0 0

1

0 0 0 00%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% ru

ral c

rash

es o

n un

seal

ed ro

ads


Figure 8.22 Icy road crashesNorth Shore City - rural council roads

00000000000%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% ru

ral c

rash

es o

n ic

y ro

ads




Figure 8.23 Collisions with objectsNorth Shore City - urban council roads

80

64 77

83112

96104

115

8678

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% u

rban

cra

shes

invo

lvin

g fix

ed o

bjec

ts


Figure 8.24 Collisions with objectsNorth Shore City - rural council roads

2

4

5

4

4

4

3

2

2

5

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


% ru

ral c

rash

es in

volv

ing

fixed

obj

ects




Figure 8.25 Objects struck - urbanNorth Shore City council roads (2005-2009)

*

*

*

*

*

*

0

0

26

14

102

11

103

193

25

84

2

86

6

*

*

*

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%

Animals

Bridge

Cliff/bank

Over bank

Fence/building

Guardrail

Island/sign/kerb

Parked vehicle

Other

Poles

Roadworks

Trees

Ditch




Figure 8.26 Objects struck - ruralNorth Shore City council roads (2005-2009)

*

*

3

7

0

5

1

0

1

2

4

2

2

0

0

*

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

Animals

Bridge

Cliff/bank

Over bank

Fence/building

Guardrail

Island/sign/kerb

Parked vehicle

Other

Poles

Roadworks

Trees

Ditch






Crash Location Statistics

89 Crash Location Statistics


90 Crash Location Statistics

North Shore City Road Safety Report 2005 - 2009

Site Radius = 30 metres

CRASH ROAD SIDE ROAD 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL

Non-Injury

Wet Crash

%

Dark Crash

% Crash Costs

GLENFIELD ROAD I DOWNING ST 9 4 2 1 3 19 11 21 16 $4,851,848

VERRAN ROAD I WAIPA ST 2 10 4 4 3 23 16 48 39 $3,946,624

GLENFIELD ROAD I PUPUKE ROAD 4 2 4 4 1 15 13 40 33 $3,570,717

EAST COAST ROAD I ABERDEEN ROAD 1 3 2 1 1 8 4 38 25 $3,527,744

WAIRAU ROAD 50 W KATHLEEN ST 1 1 1 3 2 33 33 $3,419,802

BUTE ROAD 290 E BEACH ROAD 1 2 3 1 33 $3,358,484

WAIRAU ROAD 100 N SHAKESPEARE ROAD 1 1 1 1 4 3 $3,322,806

CARLISLE ROAD 90 W LIMMER PLACE 1 1 1 3 2 33 67 $3,305,354

TAHAROTO ROAD I NORTHCOTE ROAD 14 16 14 10 9 63 52 13 21 $3,017,238

ONEWA ROAD I LAKE ROAD 10 3 4 7 7 31 21 26 39 $2,410,427

WAIRAU ROAD I VIEW ROAD E 17 5 10 3 6 41 31 15 20 $2,149,261

EAST COAST ROAD I SUNRISE AVENUE S 5 7 2 3 3 20 13 35 45 $2,058,236

TRISTRAM AVENUE I WAIRAU ROAD 15 10 9 8 16 58 48 12 16 $2,003,168

EAST COAST ROAD I OTEHA VALLEY ROAD 7 10 6 7 30 20 27 43 $1,961,565

WAIRAU ROAD I ARCHERS ROAD 17 13 12 9 4 55 45 25 27 $1,950,040

SUNSET ROAD I TARGET ROAD 4 3 2 2 2 13 6 38 31 $1,937,112

JAMES ST I GLENFIELD ROAD 9 3 4 9 5 30 21 30 13 $1,907,271

GLENFIELD ROAD I BENTLEY AVENUE 9 7 4 5 9 34 27 18 29 $1,851,077

ELLICE ROAD I WAIRAU ROAD 10 6 9 2 6 33 26 12 39 $1,844,743

MEDALLION DRIVE I OTEHA VALLEY ROAD 2 7 4 7 5 25 20 36 32 $1,596,027

ANZAC ST A BARRYS POINT ROAD 12 13 6 2 1 34 24 24 35 $1,580,585

EAST COAST ROAD I HASTINGS ROAD 2 1 3 6 12 8 42 50 $1,314,734

GLENFIELD ROAD I CORONATION ROAD 10 3 4 8 6 31 26 29 23 $1,252,011

FIRTH ROAD I CARLISLE ROAD 5 3 2 1 11 8 27 18 $1,244,406

ROSEDALE ROAD I BUSH ROAD 3 2 6 5 2 18 9 17 28 $1,243,612

SHAKESPEARE ROAD I STRATFORD AVENUE 1 4 5 1 20 $1,196,512

MOKOIA ROAD 80 W BIRKENHEAD AVENUE 2 1 1 4 25 $1,179,060

OLD UPPER HARBOUR OU I TAUHINU ROAD 3 1 1 5 2 60 80 $1,141,588

HAMMOND PLACE I BIRKENHEAD AVENUE 2 2 1 5 2 40 60 $1,132,202

LAKE ROAD I EXMOUTH ROAD 2 8 4 7 6 27 23 30 30 $1,127,959

SHAKESPEARE ROAD I TAHAROTO ROAD 13

North Shore City - Land Transport New Zealand · 2010. 7. 19. · North Shore City Road Safety...

Documents

Transcript of North Shore City - Land Transport New Zealand · 2010. 7. 19. · North Shore City Road Safety...