NORONT RESOURCES LTD. EAGLE’S NEST...
Transcript of NORONT RESOURCES LTD. EAGLE’S NEST...
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT i of iii NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ I
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... i
1 – INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT COMPONENTS .................................................................................................. 3
1.2.4 Project Schedule and Phases .................................................................................. 4
2 – APPROACH .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 APPLICABLE GUIDANCE .................................................................................................... 8 2.3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 8
2.3.1 Assessment framework ............................................................................................ 8 2.3.2 Identification of other Actions That May Affect the Same VEC ............................... 9 2.3.3 Interaction with other Projects and Activities ......................................................... 11
3 – SCOPE 13 3.1 IDENTIFIED VECS ............................................................................................................. 13 3.2 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES .................................................................................................... 13 3.3 TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES ............................................................................................... 13 3.4 OTHER PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES OF CONSIDERATION ......................................... 19
3.6.1 Summary of Cumulative Effects VECS .................................................................. 26
4 – ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ...................................................................................................... 32
5 – SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 35
6 – REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 36
7 – CERTIFICATION ........................................................................................................................... 37
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT ii of iii NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
TABLES
Table 2.1 Example Cumulative Effects Interaction Matrix ............................................................ 12 Table 3.1 Summary of Residual Effects ....................................................................................... 14 Table 3.2 Summary of Other Projects and Activities .................................................................... 21 Table 3.3 Interactions Matrix ........................................................................................................ 25 Table 3.4 Potential Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................ 27
FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Location of Project Activities .......................................................................................... 2 Figure 1.2 Mine Site Development Area .......................................................................................... 5 Figure 1.3 Transportation Corridor .................................................................................................. 6 Figure 1.4 Trans-Load Facility ......................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2.1 Cumulative Effects Assessment Framework ................................................................ 10 Figure 3.1 Cumulative Effects Study Area ..................................................................................... 18
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT iii of iii NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
ABBREVIATIONS
*** Project ............................................................................................... the Eagle’s Nest project CEA ........................................................................................... Cumulative Effects Assessment CEAA ........................................................................ Canadian Environmental Assessment Act CEA Agency ....................................................... Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency EA ..................................................................................................... environmental assessment EIS ............................................................................................ environmental impact statement FMU ..................................................................................................... Forest Management Unit Noront ...................................................................................................... Noront Resources Ltd. VEC .............................................................................................. valued ecosystem component
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 1 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
1 – INTRODUCTION
This cumulative effects assessment (CEA) has been developed as a stand-alone document to support the environmental impact statement/environment assessment report (EIS/EA report) for Noront Resources Ltd.’s (Noront’s) Eagle’s Nest Project (the Project). The report has been prepared to fulfill the assessment requirements outlined in the Project’s Draft Terms of Reference (Draft ToR) prepared by Noront (Knight Piésold, 2012). This report also addresses the aquatic assessment requirements outlined in the Environmental Impact Statement Guidelines (EIS Guidelines; CEA Agency, 2012) and the Addendum to the EIS Guidelines (CEA Agency, 2013) prepared for the Project by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency).
1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Eagle’s Nest Project is a proposed nickel, copper and platinum group deposit in the Ring of Fire region of northern Ontario (52˚ 44’ 29” N latitude and 86˚ 17’ 45” W longitude; Figure 1.1). The Project proponent is Noront, a Canadian mining company focused on mineral development in the Ring of Fire.
Eagle's Nest deposit is a vertically-oriented ore body containing mineable quantities of nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), platinum (Pt), and palladium (Pd). The deposit contains approximately 11.1 million tonnes (Mt) of proven and probable reserves and nearly 9 Mt of inferred resources. The Project involves the construction, operation and closure of a proposed underground mine, processing facility and associated ore transportation and handling infrastructure.
Based on the current Proven and Probable ore reserves, the proposed mine and associated infrastructure will operate for 11 years at an ore production rate of 2,960 tonnes per day (t/d). The processing facilities at the mine will produce a nickel-copper-platinum-palladium concentrate at a rate of 420 t/d. Tailings from the processing will be stored underground as cemented and un-cemented paste backfill. The concentrate will be transported by truck from the mine site to a rail transfer facility (trans-load facility) located near the community of Savant Lake, a distance of approximately 550 km. At the trans-load facility, the ore will be offloaded from the trucks and loaded onto rail cars for shipment to existing smelting/processing facilities located in eastern Canada via the existing Canadian National Railway (CNR). In addition to the 2,960 t/d of ore, the mine will produce 1,349 t/d of aggregate which will be used for mine site road construction and maintenance, as well as other infrastructure.
The Project includes the following components (Figure 1.1):
• A mine site • A transportation corridor • A trans-load facility
O N T A R I O
_̂
_̂
WEENUSKFIRST NATION
WAPEKEKAFIRST NATION
LAC SEULFIRST NATION
CAT LAKEFIRST NATION
PEAWANUKFIRST NATION
WEBEQUIEFIRST NATION
NIBINAMIKFIRST NATION
AROLAND FIRST NATION
MOOSE CREEFIRST NATION
GULL RIVERFIRST NATION
KINGFISHERFIRST NATION
KASABONIKAFIRST NATION
KEY-WAY-WINFIRST NATION
MUSKRAT DAMFIRST NATION WAWAKAPEWIN
FIRST NATION
SLATE FALLSFIRST NATION
GINOOGAMINGFIRST NATION
KASHECHEWANFIRST NATION
FORT ALBANYFIRST NATION
OJIBWAY NATIONOF SAUGEEN
LAKE NIPIGONFIRST NATION
ATTAWAPISKATFIRST NATION
MARTEN FALLSFIRST NATION
BEARSKIN LAKEFIRST NATION
WUNNUMIN LAKEFIRST NATION
SACHIGO LAKE FIRST NATION
CONSTANCE LAKEFIRST NATION
FORT WILLIAM FIRST NATION
MISHKEEGOGAMANGFIRST NATION
LONG LAKE #58 FIRST NATION
NORTH CARIBOU LAKEFIRST NATION
KITCHENUHMAYKOOSIBFIRST NATION
EABAMETOONG (FORT HOPE)FIRST NATION
NESKANTAGA (LANSDOWNE HOUSE)FIRST NATION
ENGLISH RIVERFIRST NATION
VICTORDIAMOND MINE
MUSSELWHITEGOLD MINE
Nakina
Hearst
MoosoneeRed Lake
Cochrane
Geraldton
Pickle Lake
Savant Lake
Kapuskasing
Fort Frances
Sioux Lookout
Smooth Rock Falls
-400
249,600
499,600
749,600
999,600
5,500,000
5,750,000
6,000,000
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.EAGLE'S NEST PROJECT
LOCATION OF PROJECT ACTIVITIESP/A NO. REF NO.
REVNB102-390/1 35
AFIGURE 1.1DATEREV20DEC'13
DESIGNED DRAWN CHK'D APP'DPAQ SWK SRA RAM
DESCRIPTIONISSUED WITH REPORTA
SAVE
D: I:\
1\02\0
0390
\01\A
\GIS\
Figs\A
521_
rA.m
xd; D
ec 20
, 201
3 11:0
3 PM;
skoz
mick
DRAFT
ò" >N
LEGEND:
0 50 100 150 200 25025 kmSCALE
EXISTING ALL-SEASON ROAD
COMMUNITY
WATER
FIRST NATIONS RESERVEPARK
RAILWAY
_̂
PROPOSED ALL-SEASON TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
MINE SITE AND TRANS-LOAD FACILITY
MINE SITE
TRANS-LOADFACILITY
UVHWY599
UVHWY17
NOTES:1. BASE MAP: © HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHTS OF CANADA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (2009). ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.2. COORDINATE GRID IS IN METRES. COORDINATE SYSTEM: NAD 1983 UTM ZONE 16N.3. PROPOSED ALL-SEASON TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR PROVIDED BY NORONT RESOURCES LTD. (MAY 30, 2013).4. ACTIVE CLAIM BOUNDARIES WERE PROVIDED BY NORONT RESOURCES LTD. (MAY 23, 2013).5. ACTIVE CLAIM BOUNDARIES PROVIDED BY MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES (AUGUST 2012).
MINING PROJECTOTHER CLAIM AREANORONT RESOURCES LTD. CLAIM AREA
2 of 37
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 3 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
1.2 PROJECT COMPONENTS
1.2.1 Mine Site
The mine site will consist of the following components (Figure 1.2):
• Underground mine, processing facility, and tailings management and storage • Surface concentrate storage and transfer facilities • Surface supporting infrastructure • Diesel power generation facilities • Fuel storage areas • Waste and water management facilities • Explosives handling and storage facilities • Site roads
Noront has elected to locate several key mine site components underground, including the processing facility and permanent disposal areas for waste rock and tailings. This will minimize the Project’s environmental footprint, as well as reduce the aggregate requirements and the cost associated with establishing surface infrastructure on the poor ground conditions associated with the wetland terrain at the mine site.
1.2.2 Transportation Corridor
Access to the Project site will be developed to transport concentrate to market and to supply the equipment and materials required to build and operate the mine. The transportation corridor will consist of the following (Figure 1.3):
• The construction and operation of a new 106 km winter road connecting the mine site to the existing winter road network south of the First Nation community of Webequie. This road will be used to support mine construction.
• Upgrading of this 106 km winter road to an all-season road for the transport of concentrate, equipment, and consumables to the mine site
• Construction and operation of an all-season road from the new 106 km road to the Pickle Lake North Road (formerly Highway 808) north of Pickle Lake. This road will primarily follow the existing 213 km winter road alignment.
• Use of the existing Pickle Lake North Road and Highway 599 to connect the new all-season road to the proposed trans-load facility located near the community of Savant Lake. This segment of the proposed corridor will be approximately 231 km.
1.2.3 Trans-load Facility
The trans-load facility will be located approximately 5 km east of the community of Savant Lake on the CNR mainline. The facility will utilize a brownfield site that was formerly a rail siding used by the forestry industry. The trans-load facility will consist of the following (Figure 1.4):
• Concentrate handling, storage and transfer facilities • Administration and security buildings • Power transmission lines • Fuel storage areas
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 4 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
• Backup diesel power generation facilities • Equipment storage and maintenance facilities • Waste and water management facilities
1.2.4 Project Schedule and Phases
The Project will comprise the following four phases and approximate timelines:
• Construction (3 years) • Operation (11 years) • Closure (2 years) • Post-closure (a minimum of 5 years)
The currently expected Project life inclusive of the construction, operation, and closure phases is 16 years. This will be followed by a post-closure monitoring phase that is expected to be 5 years, or until mine closure objectives are achieved.
WASTE FACILITYWITH INCINERATOR
PROPOSED AIRSTRIPTO BE BUILT BY OTHERS
PROPOSED ALL-SEASONTRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
MUKE
TEI RIVER
170
165
160
167.5
172.5
162.5
175
157.5
177.5
180
155
182.5
185
190
175
175
172.5
172.5
180
172.5
175
175
175
175
170
180
175
157.5
175
177.5
172.5
170
175
175
180
175
175
162.5
177.5
175
172.5
175
175
170
175
180
177.5
175
175
175
175
177.5
177.5175
170
177.5
175
175
167.5
172.5
175
175
162.5
175
172.5
175
177.5
175
175
177.5
170
167.5
165
175
175
165
175
175
175
175
175
175
167.5
157.5
177.5
177.5
160
175
175
167.5
177.5
170175
172.5
175
170
175
167.5
175
177.5
175
172.5
175
177.5
175
175
157.5
167.5
177.5
175
165
175
175175
175
175
165
162.5
177.5
175
165
170
167.5
172.5
175
180 175
175
177.5
172.5
170
172.5
160
175
175
177.5
172.5
172.5
175
175
167.5
544,500
546,000
547,500
549,000
5,841,000
5,842,500
5,844,000
5,845,500
5,847,000
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.EAGLE'S NEST PROJECT
MINE SITE DEVELOPMENT AREA
P/A NO. REF NO.
REVNB102-390/1 35
AFIGURE 1.2DATEREV20DEC'13
DESIGNED DRAWN CHK'D APP'DDKK SWK SRA RAM
DESCRIPTIONISSUED WITH REPORTA
SAVE
D: I:\
1\02\0
0390
\01\A
\GIS\
Figs\A
522_
rA.m
xd; D
ec 20
, 201
3 11:0
7 PM;
skoz
mick
ò" >N
DRAFT
LEGEND:
RIVER/STREAM/DRAINAGE
400 0 400 800 1,200 1,600 2,000200 mSCALE
NOTES:1. BASE MAP PROVIDED BY SNC-LAVALIN GROUP INC. (2010).2. COORDINATE GRID IS IN METRES. COORDINATE SYSTEM: NAD 1983 UTM ZONE 16N.3. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 2.5 METRES.4. INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION AND PROPOSED ALL-SEASON TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR PROVIDED BY NORONT RESOURCES LTD. (MAY 30, 2013). LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
WATERWETLAND
PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE
PROPOSED ALL-SEASONTRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
CONTOUR
LAYDOWN AREA
PORTAL
AGGREGATESTOCKPILE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PHASEEXPLOSIVES FACILITY
FUEL STORAGE
ACCOMMODATION FACILITIES
CROWN PILLAR
SEWAGETREATMENT PLANT
SURFACE WATERCOLLECTION PONDCONCENTRATE DRYING
AND LOADING FACILITY
CROWN PILLAREXCAVATION STOCKPILE
CROWN PILLARLAYDOWN AREA
5 of 37
_̂
_̂
MUSSELWHITEGOLD MINE
WEBEQUIEFIRST NATION
NIBINAMIKFIRST NATION
AROLAND FIRST NATION
SLATE FALLSFIRST NATION
OJIBWAY NATIONOF SAUGEEN
MARTEN FALLSFIRST NATION
MISHKEEGOGAMANGFIRST NATION
EABAMETOONG (FORT HOPE)FIRST NATION
NESKANTAGA (LANSDOWNE HOUSE)FIRST NATION
Nakina
Pickle Lake
Savant LakeSioux Lookout
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
5,600,000
5,700,000
5,800,000
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.EAGLE'S NEST PROJECT
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORP/A NO. REF NO.
REVNB102-390/1 35
AFIGURE 1.3DATEREV20DEC'13
DESIGNED DRAWN CHK'D APP'DRAC SWK SRA RAM
DESCRIPTIONISSUED WITH REPORTA
SAVE
D: I:\
1\02\0
0390
\01\A
\GIS\
Figs\A
523_
rA.m
xd; D
ec 20
, 201
3 11:1
3 PM;
spen
fold
DRAFT
ò" >N
LEGEND:
0 20 40 60 80 10010 kmSCALE
EXISTING ALL-SEASON ROAD
COMMUNITY
WATER
FIRST NATIONS RESERVEPARK
RAILWAY
_̂
PROPOSED ALL-SEASON TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
PROJECT LOCATION
MINE SITE
TRANS-LOAD FACILITY
UVHWY599
NOTES:1. BASE MAP: © HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHTS OF CANADA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (2009). ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.2. COORDINATE GRID IS IN METRES. COORDINATE SYSTEM: NAD 1983 UTM ZONE 16N.3. PROPOSED ALL-SEASON TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR PROVIDED BY NORONT RESOURCES LTD. (MAY 30, 2013).4. EXISTING WINTER ROAD NETWORK CREATED FROM DATA PROVIDED BY SNC- LAVALIN GROUP INC. (MARCH 24, 2011) AND DATA FROM THE OMNR LIO DATABASE (2009).
MUSSELWHITE MINE
CONCENTRATE HAUL ROUTE
STREAM/RIVER/DRAINAGEEXISTING WINTER ROAD
INITIALLY A NEW WINTER ROADFOLLOWED BY AN ALL-SEASON ROAD
(106 KM)
EXISTING ALL-SEASON ROAD(231 KM)
NEW ALL-SEASON ROADWITHIN EXISTING WINTER
ROAD CORRIDOR(191 KM)
6 of 37
241,000
241,200
241,400
241,600
5,570,600
5,570,800
5,571,000
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.EAGLE'S NEST PROJECT
TRANS-LOAD FACILITYP/A NO. REF NO.
REVNB102-390/1 35
AFIGURE 1.4DATEREV20DEC'13
DESIGNED DRAWN CHK'D APP'DALR SWK SRA RAM
DESCRIPTIONISSUED WITH REPORTA
SAVE
D: I:\
1\02\0
0390
\01\A
\GIS\
Figs\A
524_
rA.m
xd; D
ec 20
, 201
3 11:0
6 PM;
spen
fold
ò" >N
0 50 100 150 20025 mSCALE
NOTES:1. BASE MAP: © HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHTS OF CANADA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (2009). ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.2. COORDINATE GRID IS IN METRES. COORDINATE SYSTEM: NAD 1983 UTM ZONE 16N.3. INFRASTRUCTURE IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY TETRA TECH (APRIL 19, 2012).
DRAFTHWY 5
99
SAVANT LAKE TRANS-LOADFACILITY
SURFACE WATERCONTAINMENT AREA
TRAILERSPARKING LOT
OFFICETRUCK AND
EQUIPMENT WASH
CONCENTRATE LOAD-OUTAND STORAGE BUILDING
FORESTED AREA
LEGEND:
RIVER/STREAM/DRAINAGEWATER
EXISTING ALL-SEASON ROADRAILWAY
COMMUNITY
PROPOSED HYDRO CORRIDORPROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE
WETLAND
SURFACE WATER COLLECTION POND
SURFACE WATERCOLLECTION POND
7 of 37
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 8 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
2 – APPROACH
2.1 GENERAL
This cumulative effects assessment (CEA) identifies the residual effects of the Project and the potential for these residual effects to interact with other projects or activities, which may result in a greater effect to a Valued Ecosystem Component (VEC).
As outlined in the EIS guidelines and the ToR, cumulative environmental effects (or cumulative effects) are factors that need to be considered in the environmental assessment. Cumulative effects resulting from the Project contribute to the Ministers’ overall decision on the Project.
Cumulative effects are defined by the CEA Agency (1999) as “changes to the environment that are caused by an action in combination with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future human actions”.
The effects assessment for the Project was conducted on a defined list of VECs (Volume 2, Section 6 and 7), which were selected for the Project. As such, the CEA is also focused on determining whether cumulative effects will result from the Project on those VECs.
The Project may cause a cumulative effect on a VEC if the following occur within the same spatial and temporal boundaries, which will be defined in Section 4:
• Residual effects on VECs occur as a result of the Project • Those VECs are affected by other actions (i.e., other projects or activities)
2.2 APPLICABLE GUIDANCE
The CEA has been developed based on the requirements of the EIS guidelines and the ToR, as well as the following guidance materials:
• Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA, Agency). 1999. Cumulative Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide. Prepared by: The Cumulative Effects Assessment Working Group and AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd.
• Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency). 2007. Operational Policy Statement: Addressing Cumulative Environmental Effects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.
• Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency). 1994. Reference Guide: Addressing Cumulative Environmental Effects.
2.3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
2.3.1 Assessment framework
This CEA was conducted based on the following framework presented by the CEA Agency (1999) and illustrated in Figure 2.1:
• Scoping: o Identify regional issues of concern o Identify spatial and temporal boundaries o Identify other actions that may affect the same VECs o Identify potential impacts due to the actions and possible effects
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 9 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
• Analysis of Effects: o Complete the collection of regional baseline data o Assess effects of the Project on selected VECs o Assess the effects of all selected actions on selected VECs
• Identification of mitigation measures
• Evaluation of significance: o Evaluate the significance of residual cumulative effects o Compare results against thresholds or land use objectives or trends
• Follow-up: recommend regional monitoring and effect management
2.3.2 Identification of other Actions That May Affect the Same VEC
For each VEC, the CEA will identify other past, present and reasonably foreseeable projects and human activities that have caused, or may cause, effects and that could interact with the residual effects of the Project on each VEC being assessed.
In general, other actions:
• Are past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects that have entered into a formal project approval or permitting process
• Have been specified through discussion with regulators, Aboriginal groups and/or other stakeholders
• Possess sufficient project information to inform a CEA
Past actions contribute to baseline conditions. For the purpose of the Project effects assessment, effects from historical projects or activities will be included in the baseline conditions. While effects from current (present) actions may also be influencing baseline conditions, they will be considered in the CEA on a VEC-specific basis, since effects may continue into the future.
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 10 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Figure 2.1 Cumulative Effects Assessment Framework
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 11 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
The CEA projects and activities inclusion list for one VEC may differ from the inclusion list for another VEC due to different mechanisms of interaction. The following information sources were reviewed or consulted to prepare a preliminary list of projects and activities:
• Government websites (CEAA, MOE, MNR, MNDM) • Discussions with regulators, First Nations, and/or other stakeholders • Professional judgement
Information will be qualitative or quantitative. Where there are numerous actions in the same category that may cause similar types of effects (sector, industry type, etc.), the effects of the actions on the VEC will be assessed collectively (CEA Agency, 1999b). Projects and activities that do not possess sufficient information to inform a CEA will not be carried forward in the assessment. As outlined in the CEA Agency guide (1999b), some or all of the following information may be required to adequately assess an action’s effects:
• Location, physical size and spatial distribution of components • Components (e.g., main plant, access roads, waste disposal site) and supporting infrastructure
(e.g., waste treatment, transmission line) • Expected life or period of activity (including start date) and phasing involved (e.g., exploration,
construction, decommissioning and abandonment) • Variations in seasonal operation (e.g., winter closures) • Number of permanent and temporary employees • Frequency of use (for intermittent activities, e.g., helicopter use) • Transportation routes and mode of transport (e.g., roads, railways, shipping lanes) • Processes used • Approvals received (e.g., permit and license conditions in effect)
The level of detail for each action will differ for the CEA of each VEC (e.g., the CEA for an economic VEC may not require detailed information about project components and infrastructure).
2.3.3 Interaction with other Projects and Activities
A residual effects interaction matrix will be completed to identify potential cumulative effects of the Project and the residual effects of other projects and activities on each VEC carried forward into the CEA. An example of a residual effects interaction matrix for a VEC is shown in Table 3.1. As previously noted, matrices are used to summarize the conclusions made about interactions. A detailed explanation will be provided in the text to outline how the interactions were derived.
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 12 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Table 2.1 Example Cumulative Effects Interaction Matrix
Other Projects / Residual Effects
Residual Effect 1
Residual Effect 2
Residual Effect 3
Residual Effect 4
Project/Activity 1 Y
Project/Activity 2 Y Y
Project/Activity 3 Y Y
Project/Activity 4 Y
2.3.4 Proposed Mitigation Measures
As noted by the CEA Agency (1999), mitigating a local residual effect as much as possible is the best way to reduce cumulative effects. Mitigation measures applied or recommended for cumulative effects may be considerably different than those applied to Project effects. These additional mitigation measures may require regional stakeholder involvement.
2.3.5 Evaluation of Significance of Residual Cumulative Effect
To assess the significance of cumulative effects will requires an understanding for whether further effects can be sustained by a VEC without irreversible effects (CEA Agency, 1999). Each residual cumulative effect is classified as either significant or not significant based on the available data. The significance of residual cumulative effects is characterized in accordance with the criteria outlined in Volume 2, Section 2 for the assessment of Project residual effects. The characterization of significance of any residual cumulative effects will further consider other factors noted in federal guidance documents, including:
• Exceedance of a threshold or magnitude of change relative to natural background variability • Size of study area • Relative contribution of effects from the Project under review and other projects • Relative rarity of species • Degree of existing disturbance
Professional judgement is required to determine which factors will be considered in the evaluation of significance for cumulative effects. Factors are clearly stated in the methodology so that the assessment is rigorous and objective. Where possible, evaluation of the significance of any residual cumulative effects is discussed in relation to any regional thresholds. These thresholds could include regional planning objectives, or standards and guidelines (e.g., federal drinking water guidelines for human health). Where no defined thresholds exist, professional judgement is relied upon to evaluate the overall significance of a cumulative effect.
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 13 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
3 – SCOPE
3.1 IDENTIFIED VECS
Only those VECs identified as having a residual effect (Volume 2, Section 6 and 7) were carried forward into this CEA. Table 3.1 summarizes the residual effects of the Project on the selected VECs. Where mitigation measures were identified as not being sufficient to eliminate the potential effects, the residual effects were identified.
3.2 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES
A cumulative effects assessment scoping study area was adopted for initial consideration of other projects and activities that could potentially interact with the Project’s residual effects (See Figure 3.1). The scoping study area encompasses all of the Project’s components and associated alternatives:
• Mine site • Transportation corridor • Trans-load facility
3.3 TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES
The temporal boundaries for the assessment are defined based on the timing and duration of the Project activities that could induce effects on the aquatic resources. Long-term effects can be detected in some of the fish species and aquatic resources in the Project area, as they are long-lived. As such, the purpose of a temporal boundary is to identify when an effect may occur in relation to specific Project phases and activities. Effects will be identified with reference to activities occurring in one or more of the Project phases:
• Construction (3 years) • Operation (11 years) • Closure (2 years) • Post-closure (a minimum of 5 years)
The current expected Project life is 16 years, inclusive of the construction, operation, and closure phases.
TABLE 3.1
NORONT RESOURCES LTD. EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL EFFECTS
VEC LOCATION
(LSA/RSA/COUNTRY)/ (MS, TC, TLF)
PREDICTED DEGREE OF EFFECT AFTER MITIGATION MEASURES
SIGNIFICANCE OF RESIDUAL EFFECT
DIRECTION MAGNITUDE GEOGRAPHIC EXTENT DURATION FREQUENCY REVERSIBILITY CONTEXT PROBABILITY OF
OCCURRENCE
Ambient Air Quality
Ambient air quality effects and dust deposition
MS, TC, TLF Adverse Medium Local Long Term Infrequent Reversible Low Resilience Moderate Not Significant
Climate Change
Climate Change MS, TC, TLF Adverse Low Widespread Long Term Frequent Reversible Low Resilience Low Not Significant
Noise
Increased noise levels from regular activities such as equipment use and power generation
MS, TLF Adverse Medium Local Medium
Term Frequent Reversible
High Resilience
High Not Significant
Surface Water Quantity
Construction and use of roads and infrastructure at the mine site
MS Adverse Medium Local Long Term Frequent Irreversible High Resilience High Not Significant
Construction and use of the all-season road
TC Adverse Medium Local Long Term Frequent Irreversible High Resilience High Not Significant
Groundwater Quantity
Change in groundwater level at mine affecting surface water
MS Adverse Medium Local Medium
Term Frequent Reversible
High Resilience
High Not Significant
Fish and Fish Habitat
Increased dust emissions, erosion and sedimentation resulting in fish habitat loss and/or alteration
TC Adverse Low Local Short Term Infrequent Reversible High Resilience High Not Significant
In-stream construction activities resulting in fish habitat loss and/or alteration
TC, MS Adverse Medium Local Short Term Infrequent Reversible High Resilience High Not Significant
14 of 37
TABLE 3.1
NORONT RESOURCES LTD. EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL EFFECTS
VEC LOCATION
(LSA/RSA/COUNTRY)/ (MS, TC, TLF)
PREDICTED DEGREE OF EFFECT AFTER MITIGATION MEASURES
SIGNIFICANCE OF RESIDUAL EFFECT
DIRECTION MAGNITUDE GEOGRAPHIC EXTENT DURATION FREQUENCY REVERSIBILITY CONTEXT PROBABILITY OF
OCCURRENCE
Change in habitat productivity resulting in fish habitat loss and/or alteration
TC Adverse Low Local Short Term Infrequent Reversible High Resilience Moderate Not Significant
Riparian habitat loss and alteration at crown pillar resulting in fish habitat loss and/or alteration
MS Adverse Low Local Long Term Frequent Irreversible High Resilience Low Not Significant
Increased dust emissions, erosion and sedimentation resulting in sub-lethal effects to fish
TC Adverse Low Local Short Term Infrequent Reversible High Resilience High Not Significant
Vegetation
Physical loss or alteration MS, TC Adverse Medium Local Long Term Infrequent Reversible High Resilience High Not Significant
Wildlife
Removal of Vegetation for Project Development (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
MS, TC Adverse Medium Local Medium Term Infrequent Reversible Low Resilience High Not Significant
Dust Emissions (Degradation) (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
MS, TC Adverse Medium Local Medium Term Infrequent Reversible Low Resilience High Not Significant
Predator-Prey Relationship (Carnivores, Moose)
TC Adverse Medium Local Long Term Infrequent Irreversible High
Resilience High Not Significant
Predator-Prey Relationship (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
TC Adverse Medium Local Long Term Infrequent Irreversible Low Resilience High Not Significant
Noise and Light (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
MS, TC Adverse Medium Local Medium Term Frequent Reversible Low Resilience High Not Significant
Vehicle-wildlife interactions (Carnivores, Moose)
MS, TC Adverse Medium Local Medium Term Infrequent Reversible High
Resilience High Not Significant
Increased access for harvesting activities (Waterfowl, Furbearers, Moose, Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
MS, TC Adverse Medium Local Medium Term Infrequent Irreversible High
Resilience High Not Significant
15 of 37
TABLE 3.1
NORONT RESOURCES LTD. EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL EFFECTS
VEC LOCATION
(LSA/RSA/COUNTRY)/ (MS, TC, TLF)
PREDICTED DEGREE OF EFFECT AFTER MITIGATION MEASURES
SIGNIFICANCE OF RESIDUAL EFFECT
DIRECTION MAGNITUDE GEOGRAPHIC EXTENT DURATION FREQUENCY REVERSIBILITY CONTEXT PROBABILITY OF
OCCURRENCE
Community Dynamics
Out-migration Local Adverse Medium Local Medium
Term Infrequent Reversible High High Not Significant
Competition for Skilled Workers Local Adverse Low Local Short Term Infrequent Reversible High High Not Significant
Human Health and Well Being
Substance Abuse Local Adverse Medium Local Medium
Term Infrequent Reversible High High Not Significant
Change in Perception to Substance Abuse
Local Beneficial Medium Regional Long Term Frequent Reversible High High Significant - benefit
Adverse Parenting Change Local Adverse Low Regional Long Term Infrequent Reversible High High Not Significant
Beneficial Parenting Change Local Beneficial Medium Regional Long Term Frequent Irreversible High High Significant benefit
Training, Employment and Income
Employment Local Beneficial High LSA Medium
Term Frequent Reversible High High Significant - beneficial
Educational attainment Local Beneficial High LSA Long Term Frequent Irreversible High High Not significant - beneficial
Change in Income Local Beneficial High Local Medium
Term Frequent Reversible High High Significant beneficial
Local and Regional Economy
Government Revenues LSA/RSA/Country Beneficial Medium Country Medium
Term Frequent Reversible High High Significant - beneficial
16 of 37
TABLE 3.1
NORONT RESOURCES LTD. EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL EFFECTS
VEC LOCATION
(LSA/RSA/COUNTRY)/ (MS, TC, TLF)
PREDICTED DEGREE OF EFFECT AFTER MITIGATION MEASURES
SIGNIFICANCE OF RESIDUAL EFFECT
DIRECTION MAGNITUDE GEOGRAPHIC EXTENT DURATION FREQUENCY REVERSIBILITY CONTEXT PROBABILITY OF
OCCURRENCE
Business Opportunities LSA/RSA Beneficial Medium Regional Medium
Term Frequent Reversible High High Significant - beneficial
Cultural Resources
Potential loss or alteration of cultural or spiritual sites
LSA Adverse Low Local Long Term Infrequent Irreversible Low Low Not Significant
Aboriginal Resources and Land Use
Fishing Opportunities LSA Adverse Low Local Short Term Infrequent Reversible High
Resilience Low Not Significant
Hunting Opportunities LSA Adverse Low Local Short Term Infrequent Reversible High
Resilience Low Not Significant
Plant Harvesting Opportunities LSA Adverse Low Local Long Term Frequent Irreversible Low
Resilience Low Not Significant
Travel Routes LSA Adverse Low Local Long Term Frequent Irreversible Low
Resilience Low Not Significant
Navigable Waters
Loss of Navigability LSA Adverse High Local Long Term Infrequent Irreversible Low Resilience Low Not Significant
17 of 37
_̂
_̂
WEENUSKFIRST NATION
WAPEKEKAFIRST NATION
LAC SEULFIRST NATION
CAT LAK EFIRST NATION
PEAWANUKFIRST NATION
WEBEQUIEFIRST NATION
NIBINAMIKFIRST NATION
AROLAND FIRST NATION
MOOSE CREEFIRST NATION
GULL RIVERFIRST NATION
KINGFISHERFIRST NATION
KASABONIKAFIRST NATION
KEY-WAY-WINFIRST NATION
MUSKRAT DAMFIRST NATION
WAWAKAPEWINFIRST NATION
SLATE FALLSFIRST NATION
GINOOGAMINGFIRST NATION
KASHECHEWANFIRST NATION
FORT ALBANYFIRST NATION
OJIBWAY NATIONOF SAUGEEN
LAKE NIPIGONFIRST NATION
ATTAWAPISKATFIRST NATION
MARTEN FALLSFIRST NATION
BEARSKIN LAKEFIRST NATION
WUNNUMIN LAKEFIRST NATION
SACHIGO LAKE F IRST NATION
CONSTANCE LAKEFIRST NATION
MISHKEEGOGAMANGFIRST NATION
LONG LAKE #58 FIRST NATION
NORTH CARIBOU LAKEFIRST NATION
KITCHENUHMAYKOOSIBFIRST NATION
EABAMETOONG (FORT HOPE)FIRST NATION
NESKANTAG A (LANSDOWNE HOUSE)FIRST NATION
ENGLISH RIVERFIRST NATION
JASON
POWELL
TB720
MCINTYRE
LAKE-OSURICHELIEUNORTH BAY
MACDONELL
CROWSHORE
KING-DODDS
FOSTER LAKE
GOLDEN HOPE
LINGMAN LAKE
BERENS RIVER
ALBANY RIVER
MCREA-SIMMONS
RICHARDSON LAKE
ANACONDA IRON 1
BERENS RIVER ZONE 3
BUCKSAW'SST. ANTHONYDAWSON-WHITEDAVIDSON CARR
OUILETTE LAKE
SHAWEOGAMA LAKE
EAST OF BUCKSAW'S
WEST COUTURE LAKENORTH COUTURE LAKE
CENTRAL PATRICIA #2PICKLE CROW SHAFT NO.3
MANITOBA
QUEBEC
HUDSON BAY
JAMES BAY
VICTORDIAMOND MINE
VICTOR MINEEXTENSION PROJECT
CLIFFS CHROMITE PROJECTMUSSEL WHITE
GOLD MINE
FRESHWATER RSA
CARIBOU RSF
CUMULATIVE EFFECTSSTUDY AREA
NakinaKenora
Hearst
Moosonee
Red Lake
Geraldton
Pickle Lake
Fort Severn
KapuskasingSmooth Rock Falls
WINISK
SEVERN
EKWAN
ENGLISH
KENOGAMI
UPPER ALBANY
ATTAWAPISKAT
ABITIBI
HAYES
LOWER ALBANY
MOOSE
MISSINAIBI - MATTAGAMI
EASTERN WINNIPEG
UPPER WINNIPEG
CENTRAL HUDSON BAY
HARRICANAW
NIPIGON AND NORTHWESTERN LAKE SUPERIOR
NORTHEASTERN LAKE SUPERIOR
NOTTAWAY
MINE SITE
0 300,000
600,000
900,000
5,700,000
6,000,000
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE'S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS STUDY AREA
P/A NO. REF NO.
REV
NB102-390/1 35
AFIGURE 3.1DATEREV
20DEC'13DESIGNED DRAWN CHK'D APP'D
JSP AS SRA RAMDESCRIPTION
ISSUED WITH REPORTA
SAV
ED
: I:\1
\02\
0039
0\01
\A\G
IS\F
igs\
A44
9_rA
.mxd
; Dec
20,
201
3 11
:20
PM
; asi
mps
on
ò" >N
LEGEND:
CARIBOU FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT
0 50 100 150 200 250 30025 km
SCALE
NOTES:1. BASE MAP: © HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHTS OF CANADA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (2009). ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.2. COORDINATE GRID IS IN METRES. COORDINATE SYSTEM: NAD 1983 UTM ZONE 16N.3. PROPOSED ALL-SEASON TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR PROVIDED BY NORONT RESOURCES LTD. (MAY 30, 2013). 4. MAJOR WATERSHED DATA PROVIDED BY: NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA.5. BASE MAP IMAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI GIS ONLINE(HTTP://WWW.ARCGIS.COM).6. NEW TRANSMISSION LINE TO PICKLE LAKE OBTAINED FROM GOLDER ASSOCIATES FIGURE MAY 3, 2013.7. FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING AREA OBTAINED FROM MNR, APRIL 2013.
COMMUNITY
MINE SITE AND TRANS-LOAD FACILITY
!(
PROPOSED ALL-SEASON TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORATLANTIC OCEAN - HUDSON BAY DRAINAGE DIVIDEMAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE
ONTARIO
_̂MINE DEVELOPMENT
PROVINCIAL BORDER
EXISTING ALL-SEASON ROAD
DRAFT
RING OF FIRE CLAIM AREANEW TRANSMISSION LINE TO PICKLE LAKE PROJECT
CUMMULATIVE EFFECTS STUDY AREA
CARIBOU RSA
FRESHWATER RSA
ENGLISH RIVER FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT
MINERAL CLAIMS HELD BY OTHERS
MID CANADA LINE RADAR STATIONS
ABANDONED MINE LOCATION
18 of 37
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 19 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
The starting point for defining study areas was the delineation of the physical extent of the Project’s activities. Spatial boundaries for the effects assessment were determined individually for each VEC based on the following considerations:
• The anticipated zone of influence of project effects • Traditional and local knowledge • Current and proposed land use by Aboriginal groups • Ecological, socio-economic and cultural considerations
Regional study areas (RSAs) and local study areas (LSAs) have been identified by VEC or VEC groupings. The LSA and RSA boundaries for each VEC are described within the respective impact assessments in Sections 6, 7 and 8.
The temporal boundaries for the assessment are defined based on the timing and duration of Project activities that could induce environmental, economic, social, heritage and health effects. The purpose of a temporal boundary is to identify when an effect may occur in relation to specific Project phases and activities. Effects will be identified with reference to activities occurring in one or more of the Project phases:
• Construction (3 years) • Operation (11 years) • Closure (2 years) • Post-closure (approximately 5 years)
The current expected Project life is 16 years, inclusive of the construction, operation, and closure phases. If any or all of the existing inferred resources (approximately 9 Mt) can be converted to proven or probable reserves the mine life will increase appropriately. This will be followed by a post-closure monitoring phase that is expected to be approximately 5 years, during which it will be confirmed that mine closure objectives have been achieved.
3.4 OTHER PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES OF CONSIDERATION
Other projects were identified as being certain, reasonably foreseeable or hypothetical based on the following definitions (CEEA, 1999):
• Certain - Either the project or activity exists already or there is a high probability that it will proceed. This includes past and ongoing projects and activities as evidenced by existing disturbance areas and facilities, current land use tenures and activities, and documented land use.
• Reasonably foreseeable - There is some uncertainty about whether the action or project may proceed.
• Hypothetical - There is considerable uncertainty whether the action will ever proceed. There is not enough information available to determine otherwise.
As indicated in Section 2.3.2 and recommended in CEAA (1999), only past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects and activities are considered. Projects and activities located within the CEA scoping area are shown on Figure 3.1. Hypothetical projects are identified in Table 4.2 but will not be carried forward into the effects assessment.
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 20 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Obtaining sufficient data for meaningful analysis is a challenge in evaluating the interactions of reasonably foreseeable projects and activities, since reasonably foreseeable projects and activities are sometimes only conceptual without formalized development plans. Potential effects of some projects may not able to be accurately determined.
Projects and activities that were considered within the CEA include:
• Mineral exploration activities within the study area • Operating mines • Proposed mines • Closed/Abandoned Mines • Induced mining projects • Hydroelectric facilities • Infrastructure development • Air Transport • Forestry • Communities • Mid Canada Line Decommissioning • Induced road developments • Traditional and recreational hunting, fishing and foraging • Tourism and commercial recreational activities
Table 4.2 provides a summary of the projects and activities that were considered in the CEA. The location of these activities/projects is shown on Figure 3.1. Where there was a high degree of confidence that the other project or activity would not interact with any residual effects of the Project, it was removed from further consideration. These projects and activities were identified through desktop research and discussions with governments and stakeholders.
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 21 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Table 3.2 Summary of Other Projects and Activities
Project/Activity Project Status/Evidence
Certain Project/Activities
Musselwhite Mine Operating
Victor Mine Operating
Mining and Mineral Exploration Activities
Current mineral claim maps
Abandoned Mines Abandoned with remaining mine related hazards
Mid Canada Line Radar Station Decommissioning
Decommissioning commenced in 2011 by Ministry of Natural Resources
Traditional and Recreational Hunting, Fishing and Foraging Activities
Past, present and certain activity (based on current understanding of traditional land use)
Tourism and Commercial Recreational Activities
Past, present and certain activity
Air Transport Past, present and certain activity
Forestry activity in the Caribou Forest Management Unit
Approved harvest plan 2008 to 2018 and Phase II Term Plan scheduled for implementation in 2016
Forestry activity in the English River Forest Management Unit
Approved harvest plan 2009 to 2019 and Phase II Term Plan scheduled for implementation in 2014
Reasonably Foreseeable Projects/Activities
Victor Mine Extension Project
Notice of commencement of an Environmental Assessment, June 4, 2013
Marten Falls Logistics Airstrip Class EA approval - the airstrip will be constructed to support regional mining development. Not expected to move forward until EA approval is received and plans for construction are underway for a mining project in the Ring-of-Fire
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 22 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
3.5 PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES TO BE ASSESSED
3.5.1 Description of Certain Projects/Activities • Musselwhite Mine - The Musselwhite Mine is a fly-in/fly-out gold mine located on Opapamiskan
Lake approximately 130 km north of Pickle Lake. The mine is accessible via the Pickle Lake North Road and air. The underground gold mine has an estimated mine life of 13 years based
Project/Activity Project Status/Evidence
The New Transmission Line to Pickle Lake Project
Terms of Reference submitted May 3, 2013
Hypothetical Projects/Activities
Electrical transmission line to Ring of Fire
Induced Project - a First Nations consortium has announced intent to pursue this project, which is dependent on the New Transmission Line to Pickle Lake Project.
Transmission Line Development into First Nation Communities
Induced Project - a First Nations consortium has announced intent to pursue this project
Induced Mining Projects Development of a mine including an all-season road, given the mineral potential of the Ring of Fire, is expected to support additional mineral exploration and induce further mine development.
Cliffs Chromite Project.1
Notice of Commencement of an Environmental Assessment, June 28, 2012. (EA suspended indefinitely).
Noront’s development of other identified mineral deposits
Induced Project - if the currently proposed Project is developed, there is a possibility that other identified deposits could be developed.
Induced Road Development into First Nation Communities
Induced project - if an east-west road was built into the Ring of Fire there is a possibility that spur roads would be constructed into the local First Nation communities
Induced Road Development into Mining and Mineral Exploration Projects
Induced Project - road development would support the induced mineral exploration and mine development
Hydroelectric Projects (Attawapiskat and Winisk Rivers)
Development of the hydro potential on the Northern Rivers has been identified in the Ontario Power Authority’s long term power plan. A regulatory filing or feasibility study has not been completed.
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 23 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
on the current production rate and gold reserves. Musselwhite mine uses the Pickle Lake North Road to transport equipment and supplies to the mine site (Goldcorp, 2013).
• Victor Mine - The Victor Mine is a fly-in/fly-out diamond mine located on the Attawapiskat River approximately 160 km downstream from the Eagle’s Nest Project. Construction of the open pit mine and ancillary infrastructure began in 2006; the mine went into commercial production in 2008. The estimated mine life is 10+ years based on the estimated reserves and production rate. (De Beers, 2013)
• Mining and Mineral Exploration Activities - Since the original discovery of the Ring of Fire region there have been over 30,000 claims staked by approximately 35 companies. Prospecting and exploration activities are often intermittent and unpredictable. Claims may be visited one year and then not again for several years. The active claims are illustrated on Figure 3.1. Exploration in this region by Noront, as well as others, has taken place and can be expected to continue into the future.
• Abandoned Mines – There are many abandoned mine properties located within the CEA study area. The abandoned mine sites all have mine related hazards remaining. The hazards are either related to physical or chemical instabilities. The closest abandoned mines to the Project include the Albany River, Crowshore, Central Patricia and Central Patricia #2, as well as the Pickle Crow Gold Mine, which are all located off of Hwy. 599.
• Mid Canada Line Decommissioning - The Mid Canada Line was a series of early detection radars that ran along the 55th parallel and have now been abandoned. The Winisk Site was situated within the RCAF Winisk military base within the community of Winisk. The community relocated upstream after a major flood and is now referred to as Peawanuk (Weenusk). Clean up of the abandoned site began in 2011. Contaminates of concern included asbestos and PCBs, among others.
• Traditional and Recreational Hunting, Fishing and Foraging Activities - Communities have a terrestrial footprint and represent a human presence in the region. Additionally, on-going traditional sustenance and recreational (sport) hunting, fishing and foraging activities occur in the terrestrial and aquatic environments, concentrated mainly concentric to the communities, but also extending outward hundreds of kilometres, primarily targeting game species.
• Tourism and Commercial Recreational Activities - Tourism and commercial recreational activities in the region include the following: o Fishing and hunting are the main commercial recreational activities in the region. Fly-in
fishing camps are scattered throughout the Attawapiskat and Winisk watersheds. Tourism activity is generally limited to the summer and fall months.
o Adventure tourism: travelling the Attawapiskat, Winisk and Ekwan Rivers during the summer months. Canoeists and rafters use the provincial parks to experience what Ontario’s Far North has to offer.
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 24 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
• Air Transport – Air transport is the lifeline of the local First Nation communities and regular scheduled flights transport people, perishable items and other goods. Fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters are used for access and exploration of resource projects in the region. Most active mines and exploration projects in the area use fixed-wing aircraft to transport shift workers. At present, exploration activities rely heavily on helicopters due to the lack of an all-season road or an all-season airstrip. Development of the Project would likely reduce the region`s reliance on helicopters. o First Nations also rely on fixed wing aircraft to bring them to and from hunting grounds. o Commercial tourist outfits rely on fixed wing aircraft to transport guests to and from the
fishing and hunting camps. • Marten Falls Logistics Airstrip – Marten Falls Logistics submitted an application to the MNR in
2011 for the construction of a 3,000 m airstrip and ancillary infrastructure. The proposed airstrip is located on the east bank of the Muketei River adjacent to Noront’s Eagle’s Nest Project and Cliffs’ proposed Chromite Project. The proposed airstrip will service regional mining and mineral exploration companies. Construction of the airstrip will be induced by regional mine construction. The construction of the airstrip was originally proposed to support the development of Noront’s Eagle’s Nest Project and Cliff’s Chromite Project.
• Caribou Forest Management Unit – The east-west transportation corridor passes through the Caribou Forest Management Unit. The forest management plan outlines the activities which will take place within the unit from 2008 to 2018 and the Phase II Term Plan is scheduled for implementation in 2016.
• English River Forest Management Unit – The east-west transportation corridor passes through the English River Forest Management Unit. The forest management plan outlines the activities which will take place within the unit from 2009 to 2019 and the Phase II Term Plan is scheduled for implementation in 2014.
3.5.2 Description of Reasonably Foreseeable Projects/Activities
• Victor Mine Extension Project - The Victor Mine Extension Project is located adjacent to the existing Victor Mine. The extension project will involve the development, operation and closure of a satellite open pit, which will extend the life of the Victor Mine. The open pit will have a surface area of approximately 36 ha and will be mined at a rate of 3 million tonnes per year, with an estimated mine life of 7 years (De Beers, 2013).
• The New Transmission Line to Pickle Lake Project - Wataynikaneyap Power is proposing the development of a 230 kV alternating current transmission line from Dinorwic to Pickle Lake. The 300 km transmission line would be constructed in a 40 m wide new right-of-way alignment, within a 2 km wide corridor (Wataynikaneyap Power, 2013). The project is being developed in support of Ontario’s Long Term Energy Plan (Government of Ontario, 2010). The transmission line will improve the existing power supply in the Pickle Lake region and potentially allow for future connects to remote First Nation communities.
3.6 INTERACTION ASSESSMENT
A summary of the potential interactions between the VECs identified and the other projects and activities are summarized in Table 4.3.
TABLE 3.3
NORONT RESOURCES LTD. EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
INTERACTIONS MATRIX
VEC
MU
SSEL
WH
ITE
MIN
E
VIC
TOR
MIN
E
MIN
ING
AN
D M
INER
AL
EXPL
OR
ATI
ON
A
CTI
VITI
ES
AB
AN
DO
NED
MIN
ES
MID
CA
NA
DA
LIN
E R
AD
AR
STA
TIO
N
DEC
OM
MIS
SIO
NIN
G
TRA
DIT
ION
AL
AN
D
REC
REA
TIO
NA
L H
UN
TIN
G, F
ISH
ING
AN
D
FOR
AG
ING
AC
TIVI
TIES
TOU
RIS
M A
ND
C
OM
MER
CIA
L R
ECR
EATI
ON
AL
AC
TIVI
TIES
AIR
TR
AN
SPO
RT
FOR
ESTR
Y A
CTI
VITY
C
AR
IBO
U F
MU
FOR
ESTR
Y A
CTI
VITY
EN
GLI
SH R
IVER
FM
U
VIC
TOR
MIN
E EX
TEN
SIO
N P
RO
JEC
T
MA
RTE
N F
ALL
S LO
GIS
TIC
S A
IRST
RIP
NEW
TR
AN
SMIS
SIO
N
LIN
E TO
PIC
KLE
LA
KE
PRO
JEC
T
Ambient Air Quality
Ambient air quality effects and dust deposition YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Climate Change
Climate Change YES YES YES NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES YES NO
Noise
Increased noise levels from regular activities such as equipment use and power generation NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO YES NO
Surface Water Quantity
Construction and use of roads and infrastructure at the mine site NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Construction and use of the all-season road NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Groundwater Quantity
Change in groundwater level at mine affecting surface water NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Fish and Fish Habitat
Increased dust emissions, erosion and sedimentation resulting in fish habitat loss and/or alteration NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
In-stream construction activities resulting in fish habitat loss and/or alteration NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Change in habitat productivity resulting in fish habitat loss and/or alteration NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Riparian habitat loss and alteration at crown pillar resulting in fish habitat loss and/or alteration NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Increased dust emissions, erosion and sedimentation resulting in sub-lethal effects to fish NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Vegetation
Physical loss or alteration YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES YES NO
Wildlife
Removal of Vegetation for Project Development (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou) YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES NO YES YES YES
Dust Emissions (Degradation) (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO
Predator-Prey Relationship (Carnivores, Moose)
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Predator-Prey Relationship (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Noise and Light (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
YES YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES YES YES YES NO
Vehicle-wildlife interactions (Carnivores, Moose)
YES NO YES NO NO YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO
Increased access for harvesting activities (Waterfowl, Furbearers, Moose, Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
YES YES NO NO NO YES YES NO YES YES YES NO NO
25 of 37
TABLE 3.3
NORONT RESOURCES LTD. EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
INTERACTIONS MATRIX
VEC
MU
SSEL
WH
ITE
MIN
E
VIC
TOR
MIN
E
MIN
ING
AN
D M
INER
AL
EXPL
OR
ATI
ON
A
CTI
VITI
ES
AB
AN
DO
NED
MIN
ES
MID
CA
NA
DA
LIN
E R
AD
AR
STA
TIO
N
DEC
OM
MIS
SIO
NIN
G
TRA
DIT
ION
AL
AN
D
REC
REA
TIO
NA
L H
UN
TIN
G, F
ISH
ING
AN
D
FOR
AG
ING
AC
TIVI
TIES
TOU
RIS
M A
ND
C
OM
MER
CIA
L R
ECR
EATI
ON
AL
AC
TIVI
TIES
AIR
TR
AN
SPO
RT
FOR
ESTR
Y A
CTI
VITY
C
AR
IBO
U F
MU
FOR
ESTR
Y A
CTI
VITY
EN
GLI
SH R
IVER
FM
U
VIC
TOR
MIN
E EX
TEN
SIO
N P
RO
JEC
T
MA
RTE
N F
ALL
S LO
GIS
TIC
S A
IRST
RIP
NEW
TR
AN
SMIS
SIO
N
LIN
E TO
PIC
KLE
LA
KE
PRO
JEC
T
Community Dynamics
Out-migration NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Competition for Skilled Workers YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES YES YES NO YES
Human Health and Well Being
Substance Abuse YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES YES YES NO NO
Change in Perception to Substance Abuse YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES YES YES NO NO
Adverse Parenting Change YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES YES YES NO NO
Beneficial Parenting Change YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES YES YES NO NO
Training, Employment and Income
Employment YES YES YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES YES YES YES
Educational attainment YES YES YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES YES YES YES
Change in Income YES YES YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES YES YES YES
Local and Regional Economy
Government Revenues YES YES YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES YES YES YES
Business Opportunities YES YES YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES YES YES YES
Cultural Resources
Potential loss or alteration of cultural or spiritual sites NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Aboriginal Resources and Land Use
Fishing Opportunities YES NO NO NO NO YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO
Hunting Opportunities YES NO NO NO NO YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO
Plant Harvesting Opportunities YES NO NO NO NO YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO
Travel Routes NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Navigable Waters
Loss of Navigability NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
NOTES:
1. YES IS USED TO INDICATE WHERE A RESIDUAL EFFECT OF THE NORONT PROJECT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO OVERLAP SPATIALLY AND TEMPORAL WITH AN ASSUMED RESIDUAL EFFECTS OF OTHER PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES.
26 of 37
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 27 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
3.6.1 Summary of Cumulative Effects VECS
Residual effects that interacted both spatially and temporally with other projects and activities have been carried forward into the CEA as potential cumulative effects and are summarized with potential mitigation measures in Table 3.4.
Table 3.4 Potential Cumulative Effects
Noront Project Residual Effect Project or Activity Mitigation Measures
Ambient Air Quality Effects and Dust Deposition • Musselwhite
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 6.1 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied
Climate Change
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Air transportation • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip
• Mitigation strategies outlined in Section 6.2 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to reduce GHG emissions
• Progressive reclamation will replace lost boreal forest vegetation
Increased Noise Levels (Equipment Use and Generators)
• Air Transportation • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 6.4 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to reduce noise emission
Physical Loss or alteration of Vegetation
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Victor Mine Extension • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 6.7 will be applied to reduce the loss or alteration of vegetation
Removal of Vegetation for Project Development (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip • New transmission line to Pickle
Lake Project
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 6.7 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to minimize the removal of vegetation during Project Development
Dust Emissions (Degradation) (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
• Musselwhite Mine • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 6.1 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to reduce dust emissions
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 28 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Noront Project Residual Effect Project or Activity Mitigation Measures
Noise and Light (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Mid-Canada Line Radar Station
Decommissioning • Traditional, recreational, tourism,
hunting, fishing and foraging • Tourism and commercial
recreational activities • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU)
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 6.3 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to reduce noise and light emission.
Vehicle-wildlife interactions (Carnivores, Moose)
• Musselwhite Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Traditional, recreational, tourism,
hunting, fishing and foraging • Tourism and commercial
recreational activities • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU)
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 6.8 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to minimize the vehicle-wildlife interactions
Increased access for harvesting activities (Waterfowl, Furbearers, Moose, Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Traditional, recreational, tourism,
hunting, fishing and foraging • Tourism and commercial
recreational activities • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU)
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 6.8 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to minimize the effect of increased access for harvesting activities
Competition for Skilled Workers
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension • New transmission line to Pickle
Lake Project
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.2 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to minimize the effect of competition for skilled workers
Substance Abuse
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.3 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to minimize the effect of substance abuse
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 29 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Noront Project Residual Effect Project or Activity Mitigation Measures
Change in Perception to Substance Abuse
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.3 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to maximize the effect of changing perception to substance abuse
Adverse Parenting Change
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.3 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to minimize the effect of adverse changes to parenting
Beneficial Parenting Change
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.3 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to maximize the effect of beneficial changes to parenting
Employment
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Mid-Canada Line Radar Station
Decommissioning • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip • New transmission line to Pickle
Lake Project •
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.5 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to maximize the effect of increased employment
Educational attainment
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Mid-Canada Line Radar Station
Decommissioning • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip • New transmission line to Pickle
Lake Project
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.5 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to maximize the effect of increased educational attainment
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 30 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Noront Project Residual Effect Project or Activity Mitigation Measures
Change in Income
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Mid-Canada Line Radar Station
Decommissioning • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip • New transmission line to Pickle
Lake Project
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.5 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to maximize the effect of increases to income
Government Revenues
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Mid-Canada Line Radar Station
Decommissioning • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip • New transmission line to Pickle
Lake Project
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.6 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to ensure appropriate government revenues
Business Opportunities
• Musselwhite Mine • Victor Mine • Mining and Mineral Exploration • Mid-Canada Line Radar Station
Decommissioning • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU) • Victor Mine Extension • Marten falls Logistics Airstrip • New transmission line to Pickle
Lake Project
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.6 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to maximize local business opportunities
Fishing Opportunities
• Musselwhite Mine • Traditional, recreational, tourism,
hunting, fishing and foraging • Tourism and commercial
recreational activities • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU)
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.8 and 7.9 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to minimize adverse impacts to recreational fishing opportunities
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 31 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Noront Project Residual Effect Project or Activity Mitigation Measures
Hunting Opportunities
• Musselwhite Mine • Traditional, recreational, tourism,
hunting, fishing and foraging • Tourism and commercial
recreational activities • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU)
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.8 and 7.9 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to minimize adverse impacts to recreational hunting opportunities
Plant Harvesting Opportunities
• Musselwhite Mine • Traditional, recreational, tourism,
hunting, fishing and foraging • Tourism and commercial
recreational activities • Forestry (Caribou and English
River FMU)
• Mitigation measures outlined in Section 7.8 of the EIS/EA Report will be applied to minimize adverse impacts to plant harvesting opportunities
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 32 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
4 – ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
The relative significance of residual cumulative effect was evaluated based on a suite of standardized criteria including: magnitude, geographical extent, duration, frequency, reversibility, context and likelihood of occurrence. A rating was assigned and compiled in Table 4.1 to the residual cumulative effects identified in Table 3.4.
Residual Cumulative Effect
Predicted Degree of Effect After Additional Mitigation Measure Significance of Residual Cumulative Effect
Dire
ctio
n
Mag
nitu
de
Geo
grap
hic
Exte
nt
Dur
atio
n
Freq
uenc
y
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Con
text
Like
lihoo
d/
Prob
abili
ty o
f O
ccur
renc
e
Ambient Air Quality Effects and Dust Deposition
Adverse Low Local Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible Low Resilience
Moderate Not Significant
Climate Change
Adverse Low Widespread Long Term
Frequent Reversible Low Resilience
High Not Significant
Increased Noise Levels (Equipment Use and Generators)
Adverse Low Local Medium Term
Frequent Reversible High Resilience
High Not Significant
Physical Loss or alteration of Vegetation
Adverse Low Local Long Term
Infrequent Irreversible Low Resilience
High Not Significant
Removal of Vegetation for Project Development (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
Adverse Low Local Long Term
Infrequent Irreversible Low Resilience
High Not Significant
Dust Emissions (Degradation) (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
Adverse Low Local Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible Low Resilience
High Not Significant
Noise and Light (Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
Adverse Low Local Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible Low Resilience
High Not Significant
Vehicle-wildlife interactions (Carnivores, Moose)
Adverse Low Local Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible High
Resilience
Low Not Significant
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 33 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Residual Cumulative Effect
Predicted Degree of Effect After Additional Mitigation Measure Significance of Residual Cumulative Effect
Dire
ctio
n
Mag
nitu
de
Geo
grap
hic
Exte
nt
Dur
atio
n
Freq
uenc
y
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Con
text
Like
lihoo
d/
Prob
abili
ty o
f O
ccur
renc
e
Increased access for harvesting activities (Waterfowl, Furbearers, Moose, Wolverine, Woodland Caribou)
Adverse Low Local Long Term
Infrequent Irreversible High Resilience
Moderate Not Significant
Competition for Skilled Workers
Adverse Medium
Regional Medium Term
Frequent Reversible High Resilience
High Not Significant
Substance Abuse
Adverse Low Local Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible High Resilience
Low Not Significant
Change in Perception to Substance Abuse
Beneficial High Local Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible High Resilience
Low Beneficial Not Significant
Adverse Parenting Change
Adverse Low Local Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible High Resilience
Low Not Significant
Beneficial Parenting Change
Beneficial High Local Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible High Resilience
Low Beneficial -Not Significant
Employment Beneficial High Regional Medium
Term Infrequent Reversible High
Resilience High Beneficial Not
Significant
Educational attainment
Beneficial High Regional Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible High Resilience
High Beneficial Not Significant
Change in Income
Beneficial High Regional Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible High Resilience
High Beneficial Not Significant
Government Revenues
Beneficial High Regional Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible High Resilience
High Beneficial Not Significant
Business Opportunities
Beneficial High Regional Medium Term
Infrequent Reversible High Resilience
High Beneficial Not Significant
Fishing Opportunities
Beneficial Low Local Long Term
Infrequent Irreversible High Resilience
High Beneficial Not Significant
Hunting Opportunities
Beneficial Low Local Long Term
Infrequent Irreversible High Resilience
High Beneficial Not Significant
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 34 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
Residual Cumulative Effect
Predicted Degree of Effect After Additional Mitigation Measure Significance of Residual Cumulative Effect
Dire
ctio
n
Mag
nitu
de
Geo
grap
hic
Exte
nt
Dur
atio
n
Freq
uenc
y
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Con
text
Like
lihoo
d/
Prob
abili
ty o
f O
ccur
renc
e
Plant Harvesting Opportunities
Adverse Low Local Long Term
Infrequent Irreversible Low Resilience
Low Not Significant
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 35 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
5 – SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The potential for beneficial cumulative socio-economic effects arising from interactions between the Project and other foreseeable projects is acknowledged. None of the cumulative effects assessed lead to significant effects. However, uncertainty related to thresholds and the direction of future development suggests that monitoring may need to take place. The socio-economic monitoring framework described in Volume 4, Section 2, addresses the need for collaboration in many areas of monitoring.
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 36 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
6 – REFERENCES
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA, Agency). 1999. Cumulative Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide. Prepared by: The Cumulative Effects Assessment Working Group and AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency). 2007. Operational Policy Statement: Addressing Cumulative Environmental Effects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency). 1994. Reference Guide: Addressing Cumulative Environmental Effects.
Cliffs Natural Resources. 2011. Cliffs Chromite Project - Project Description Summary - Update #1. October, 2011.
De Beers Canada. 2013. Victor Mine Extension Project - Project Description. Prepared by AMEC Environment and Infrastructure (AMEC), April.
Goldcorp. 2013. Musselwhite - Overview & Permitting Highlights. Retrieved from: http://www.goldcorp.com/English/Unrivalled-Assets/Mines-and-Projects/Canada-and-US/Operations/Musselwhite/Overview-and-Operating-Highlights/default.aspx Last Accessed November, 2013.
Government of Ontario. 2010. Ontario’s Long Term Energy Plan. Queens Printer for Ontario, 2010.
Wataynikaneyap Power. 2013. Final Terms of Reference for the New Transmission Line to Pickle Lake Project Environmental Assessment. Prepared by Golder Associates, May 2013.
NORONT RESOURCES LTD.
EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT
CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT 37 of 37 NB102-390/1-35 Rev A December 20, 2013
7 – CERTIFICATION
This report was prepared, reviewed and approved by the undersigned.
Prepared:
Jason Plamondon, B.Sc. Project Environmental Scientist
Reviewed:
Richard Cook, P.Geo. Ltd. Senior Environmental Scientist
Approved:
Robert A. Mercer, Ph.D., P.Eng. Managing Principal, North Bay
This report was prepared by Knight Piésold Ltd. for the account of NORONT RESOURCES LTD.. Report content reflects Knight Piésold’s best judgement based on the information available at the time of preparation. Any use a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions made based on it is the responsibility of such third parties. Knight Piésold Ltd. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. This numbered report is a controlled document. Any reproductions of this report are uncontrolled and might not be the most recent revision.