[Nordic GBC Conference 2013] Aalto University - Experiences on Zero-Energy Building
-
Upload
gbc-finland -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.284 -
download
1
description
Transcript of [Nordic GBC Conference 2013] Aalto University - Experiences on Zero-Energy Building
LUUKKU and LANTTI EXPERIENCES on ZERO-ENERGY BUILDING in AALTO UNIVERSITY
LUUKKU WOODEN HOUSE of 2020’s
• DESIGNED and BUILD by AALTO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
• PARTICIPATED SOLAR DECATHLON EUROPE 2010 COMPETITION in SUMMER 2010 with 18 UNIVERSITIES
• MULTI-DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH and EDUCATION PROJECT
LUUKKU HOUSE
ENERGY SAVING
STRUCTURES:
– AIR-TIGHTNESS (n50 = 0,6 1/h)
– AVOIDING THERMAL BRIDGES
– EXCELLENT THERMAL INSULATION U-values = 0,08…0,09 W/m2K
STRUCTURES:
– KERTO LVL-PANEL FRAME
• air-tightness, sealing the corners
• wheather protection
– SEPA-TRUSS THERMAL-CUT ELEMENTS
• cellulose fiber insulation 350mm, U = 0,08 W/m2K
• wood-fibre board
ENERGY SAVING
ENERGY SAVING
• OPENINGS:
– SIZE, AMOUNT ORIENTATION
– U = 0,35
– SHADING
SOLAR ELECTRICITY to the NET6900 kWh/a
SOLAR HEAT for OWN USE1000 kWh/a
ELECTRICITYfrom the NET5000 kWh/a
TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS
• VENTILATION INTEGRATED into AIR-to-AIR HEAT PUMP
• EASY USER-INTERFACE to CONTROL THE USE OF ENERGY
• INTEGRATED BIM-BASED DESIGN PROCESS
• DYNAAMIC ENERGY-SIMULATION through WHOLE DESIGN PROCESS
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
kW
h
SOLAR COLLECTORS / PRODUCTION
PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS / PRODUCTION
FANS, PUMPS ETC.
LIGHTING
EQUIPMENT
DOMESTIC HOT WATER
SPACE COOLING
SPACE HEATING
TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS
ENERGY PRODUCTION
– 60 m2 PHOTO-VOLTAIC PANELS (electricity) – 5 m2 SOLAR COLLECTORS (domestic hot water)
• PLUS-ENERGY HOUSE both in FINLAND and SPAIN– Helsinki: production 3100 kWh more than
consumption / year
– Mäntyharju: production1900 kWh more than consumption / year
– Madrid: production 2,5 x consumption
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
MADRID ESPOO MÄNTYHARJU
kWh NET ENERGY CONSUMPTION
NET ENERGY GENERATION
ENERGY BALANCE E = -76
• USE OF RENEWABLE BUILDING MATERIALS
– 75% RENEWABLE MATERIALS
– CO2 STORAGE: 26 000 kg
– CO2 EMISSIONS:15 000 kg
– CHOISE OF MATERIALS BASED ON LIFE-CYCLE ASSESTMENT
MATERIALS
• INNOVATIVE USE OF WOOD
– EFFEX-INTERIOR PANELS
• Moisture buffering, acoustics
• Hiding the element seams
– GORK–WOOD–GLASS DOORS & WINDOWS
• thermal-cut, stiffness, weather protection
WOOD
• BIM –MODELLING
• DYNAMIC ENERGY-SIMULATION with IDA-ICE
• 1:1 PLYWOOD INTERIOR MODEL to STUDY THE SPACE
• 1:20…1:1 DETAIL MODELS
MODELLING
Aalto University FinlandArts et Metiers Paris Tech FranceBergische Universität Wuppertal GermanyEcole National Supérieure d'architecture de Grenoble FranceFachhochschule fur Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin GermanyInstituto de Arquitectura Avanzada de Cataluña SpainStuttgart University of Applied Sciences (HFT Stuttgart) GermanyTianjin University ChinaTongii University Shanghai ChinaUniversity of Applied Sciences Rosenheim GermanyUniversidad CEU Cardenal Herrera SpainUniversity of Florida USAUniversity of Nottingham Great BritainUniversidad Politécnica de Cataluña (UPC) SpainUniversidad de Sevilla SpainUniversidad de Valladolid SpainVirginia Polytechnic Institute & State University USA
SOLAR DECATHLON 2010
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University USAUniversity of Applied Sciences Rosenheim GermanyStuttgart University of Applied Sciences (HFT Stuttgart) GermanyEcole National Supérieure d'architecture de Grenoble FranceAalto University FinlandBergische Universität Wuppertal GermanyArts et Metiers Paris Tech FranceUniversity of Florida USAUniversidad CEU Cardenal Herrera SpainFachhochschule fur Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin GermanyTongii University Shanghai ChinaUniversidad de Sevilla SpainUniversidad Politécnica de Cataluña (UPC) SpainUniversidad de Valladolid SpainUniversity of Nottingham Iso-BritanniaTianjin University ChinaInstituto de Arquitectura Avanzada de Cataluña Spain
SOLAR DECATHLON 2010
LUUKKU HOUSE
”WOODEN HOUSE THAT ONLY FINNS STILL CAN BUILD”Glenn Murcutt, 2010
LANTTI FINNISH ZERO-ENERGY HOUSE 2020
HOUSING FAIR 2012 in TAMPERE
AIMS:
1. STANDARD DETACHED HOUSE with E-VALUE = 0- BASED ON PRIMARY ENERGY CALCULATION
- CALCULATED ON ANNUAL CONSUMPTION
AIMS:
1. STANDARD DETACHED HOUSE with E-VALUE = 0- BASED ON PRIMARY ENERGY CALCULATION
- CALCULATED ON ANNUAL CONSUMPTION
2. ADAPTABILITY- FLEXIBLE PLAN VARIATIONS
- ADAPTABILITY to DIFFERENT HOUSING TYPES
AIMS:
1. STANDARD DETACHED HOUSE with E-VALUE = 0- BASED ON PRIMARY ENERGY CALCULATION
- CALCULATED ON ANNUAL CONSUMPTION
2. ADAPTABILITY- FLEXIBLE PLAN VARIATIONS
- ADAPTABILITY to DIFFERENT HOUSING TYPES
3. ECONOMICAL SOLUTIONS
MEANS:
1. SAVING ENERGY
MEANS:
1. SAVING ENERGY
2. OWN ENERGY PRODUCTION
MEANS:
1. SAVING ENERGY
2. OWN ENERGY PRODUCTION
3. USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
MEANS:
1. SAVING ENERGY
2. OWN ENERGY PRODUCTION
3. USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
4. CAREFUL DETAILING in BUILDING PHASE
ARCHITECTURE:
- LOW FORM FACTOR = COMPACT VOLUME
ARCHITECTURE:
- LOW FORM FACTOR = COMPACT VOLUME
- ORIENTATION + SIZE of the WINDOWS
STRUCTURE:
- EFFECTIVE THERMAL INSULATION, U = 0,07 - 0,09 W/m2k
STRUCTURE:
- EFFECTIVE THERMAL INSULATION, U = 0,07 - 0,09 W/m2k
- GOOD AIR-TIGHTNESS (n50 = 0,3 1/h)
STRUCTURE:
- EFFECTIVE THERMAL INSULATION, U = 0,07 - 0,09 W/m2k
- GOOD AIR-TIGHTNESS (n50 = 0,3 1/h)
- AVOIDING THERMAL BRIDGES- thermal-cut stud-frame
TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS:
HEATING and DOMESTIC HOT WATER:
- DISTRICT HEATING
HEATING and DOMESTIC HOT WATER:
- DISTRICT HEATING
- SOLAR COLLECTORS 8 m² (domestic hot water)
HEATING and DOMESTIC HOT WATER:
- DISTRICT HEATING
- SOLAR COLLECTORS 8 m² (domestic hot water)
- WATER BASED FLOOR HEATING- optimized by the different uses of the spaces
VENTILATION:
- HEAT-RECOVERY, with 80 % annual effectivity
VENTILATION:
- HEAT-RECOVERY, with 80 % annual effectivity
- ROTATING HEAT EXCHANGER
VENTILATION:
- HEAT-RECOVERY, with 80 % annual effectivity
- ROTATING HEAT EXCHANGER
- FRESH AIR PRE-HEATED with DISTRICT HEAT
LIGHTING:
- OPTIMISED USED of NATURAL LIGHT(avoiding overheating, window in every space)
LIGHTING:
- OPTIMISED USED of NATURAL LIGHT(avoiding overheating, window in every space)
- LED-LIGHTING
LIGHTING:
- OPTIMISED USED of NATURAL LIGHT(avoiding overheating, window in every space)
- LED-LIGHTING
- KNX-BASED LIGHTING CONTROL
APPLIANCES:
- AA-ENERGY CLASS APPLIENCES and DEVICES
APPLIANCES:
- AA-ENERGY CLASS APPLIENCES and DEVICES
- WATER SAVING TAPS
APPLIANCES:
- AA-ENERGY CLASS APPLIENCES and DEVICES
- WATER SAVING TAPS
- HOME / AWAY SWITCH
MATERIALS:
- HIGH TEMPERATURE of WOODEN SURFACES
MATERIALS:
- HIGH TEMPERATURE of WOODEN SURFACES
- LIGHT REFLECTING SURFACES
MATERIALS:
- HIGH TEMPERATURE of WOODEN SURFACES
- LIGHT REFLECTING SURFACES
- WOOD as MOISTURE BUFFER
DESIGN AND BUILDING:
- COLLABORATION within the DESIGN TEAM
-
DESIGN AND BUILDING:
- COLLABORATION within the DESIGN TEAM
- GUIDANCE and SUPERVISION on BUILDING SITE
DESIGN AND BUILDING:
- COLLABORATION within the DESIGN TEAM
- GUIDANCE and SUPERVISION on BUILDING SITE
- COMPREHENSIVE, HOLISTIC APPROACH
DESIGN AND BUILDING:
- COLLABORATION within the DESIGN TEAM
- GUIDANCE and SUPERVISION on BUILDING SITE
- COMPREHENSIVE, HOLISTIC APPROACH
- ROLES in the TEAM
ENERGY PRODUCTION
- SOLAR PANELS 60 m2
- production 7020 kWh/a (electricity)
ENERGY PRODUCTION
- SOLAR PANELS 60 m2
- production 7020 kWh/a (electricity)
- SOLAR COLLECTORS 8 m2
- production 2660 kWh/a (domestic hot water)
ENERGYBALANCEE = -1
PRODUCTION and CONSUMPTION:
- IN DIFFERENT TIMES
- ORIENTATION OF THE HOUSE
MONITORING:
- REAL-TIME CONSUMPTION an PRODUCTION
- GUIDING USER INTERFACE
- THICKLY INSULATED STUCTURES- floor, roof and wall
1. USEABILITY and COMFORT!
DID WE LEARN?
1. USEABILITY and COMFORT!
2. COOLING or SHADING?
3. EXTRA HEAT of THE APPLIANCES?
4. INTEGRATION of SOLAR TECHNOLOGY?
DID WE LEARN?
1. USEABILITY and COMFORT!
2. COOLING or SHADING?
3. EXTRA HEAT of THE APPLIANCES?
4. INTEGRATION of SOLAR TECHNOLOGY?
5. COSTS...UPGRADEABILITY
DID WE LEARN?
1. USEABILITY and COMFORT!
2. COOLING or SHADING?
3. EXTRA HEAT of THE APPLIANCES?
4. INTEGRATION of SOLAR TECHNOLOGY?
5. COSTS...UPGRADEABILITY
6. NO-TECH or/and HI-TECH?
7. TRADITION and NATURAL LAWS?
8. COMMON SENSE, CREATIVITY, RISK
9. ARCHITECTURE?
DID WE LEARN?
1. USEABILITY and COMFORT!
2. COOLING or SHADING?
3. EXTRA HEAT of THE APPLIANCES?
4. INTEGRATION of SOLAR TECHNOLOGY?
5. COSTS...UPGRADEABILITY
6. NO-TECH or/and HI-TECH?
7. TRADITION and NATURAL LAWS?
8. COMMON SENSE, CREATIVITY, RISK
9. ARCHITECTURE?
10.LOW ENERGY + LOW CARBON = HIGH QUALITY
DID WE LEARN?
IMPROVE AWARD 2010
THE DEVELOPER of USE OF WOOD 2010
WOOD AWARD 2010” Without multi-disciplinary teamwork we could not have reached the goals”
professor Kai Sirén, chairman of the Steering group
WAS IT WORTH?
LANTTI FINNISH ZERO-ENERGY HOUSE 2020
MAIN PARTNERS: