NonStress Tests & Using Fetal Monitors in Midwifery...
Transcript of NonStress Tests & Using Fetal Monitors in Midwifery...
NonStress Tests & Using Fetal
Monitors in Midwifery
Practice
KarenE.Hays,DNP,CNM,ARNP
MAWSConference
November9,2012
photosremoved
Objectives 1. List6indicaEonsforperforminganonstress
test(NST),anddiscusshowtheNSTmight
provideimportantinformaEonforproviding
qualitymidwiferycare.
2. State10minimaldocumentaEon
requirementswhencharEngtheresultsofan
NST,anddiscusswhytheyareimportant.
3. IdenEfyNSTresultsthatindicatetheneedfor
consultaEon,co‐management,orreferral.
What are the goals of doing an NST?
1. ToidenEfy…
____________________________
2. Inordertoprevent…
____________________________
What are the goals of doing an NST?
1. ToidenEfyifthereispossiblestress
tofetaloxygenaEon&threatsto
acid‐base(pH)status. [Whichwecall“fetalwell‐being”.]
2. Topreventintrauterineasphyxia
andfetal/neonatalorgandamage
ordeath.
What are the goals of doing an NST?
1. ToidenEfyifthereispossiblestress
tofetaloxygenaEon&threatsto
acid‐base(pH)status.
2. Topreventintrauterineasphyxia
andfetal/neonatalorgandamageor
death.
Thejourneyfrom#1to#2canoccurslowly
orquickly,andiso;enunpredictable.
Fetal Physiology
SeeAfors,K.,&Chandraharan,E.(2011).Useof
conEnuouselectronicfetalmonitoringina
pretermfetus:Clinicaldilemmasand
recommendaEonsforpracEce.Journalof
Pregnancy,doi:10.1155/2011/848794
foranexcellentgraphexplainingfetal
physiologyandtheeffectsofstress
photosremoved
Aspects of the NST • Recognizingwhenitisindicated
– Riskfactorforfetalwell‐beinghasbeenidenEfied
– GestaEonalage>28weeks(somesay32weeks)
• Appropriateinformedconsent
– ClientunderstandswhattheNSTcan&cannottellus
• Performingitcorrectly
– TocoispresentandfuncEoning
– FHR(notmaternalHR)istracingconEnuously
• Interpre9ngitcorrectly
– Understandingphysiology
– Usingdefinedterminology
• Takingappropriateac9on
– DocumentaEon
– ConsultaEonorreferralifindicated
photoremoved
Indications for an NST in midwifery practice
Ariskfactor
hasbeen
iden@fied.
Whattypesof
clinicalsitua8ons
wouldinspirea
midwifetoorderor
performanNST?photoremoved
Indications for an NST in midwifery practice
Ariskfactor
hasbeen
iden@fied.
• Decreasedfetalmovement
• Imminentposhermorposherm
• Hxofobstetricalproblem
o SEllbirth
o LBW
o Others
• CurrentmedicalorOBproblem
o GDM
o HTN
o Almostanything!
• Reassurance
photoremoved
Interpreting the NST: NICHD Terminology?
WorkingGroupjointlysponsoredbytheNaEonal
InsEtuteofChildHealth&Development,ACOG,
&theSocietyforMaternal‐FetalMedicine
Terminology:
1stformalizedin1997
>30yearsanertheEFMwasintroduced
2008wasthenextupdate
Evidencebased?
Theyrecommendmoreresearchneedstobedone….
NICHD 2008 Categories
CATEGORYI
Normal
Baseline110‐160
andModerateVariability
andNoLateorVariableDecels
Accels&EarlyDecelspresentorabsent
CATEGORYII
Indeterminate
CATEGORYIII
Abnormal
NICHD 2008 Categories
CATEGORYI
Normal
Baseline110‐160
andModerateVariability
andNoLateorVariableDecels
Accels&EarlyDecelspresentorabsent
PredicEveof
normalpH.
Ac9on:
RouEnecare
CATEGORYII
Indeterminate
CATEGORYIII
Abnormal
NICHD 2008 Categories
CATEGORYI
Normal
Baseline110‐160
andModerateVariability
andNoLateorVariableDecels
Accels&EarlyDecelspresentorabsent
PredicEveof
normalpH.
Ac9on:
RouEnecare
CATEGORYII
Indeterminate
CATEGORYIII
Abnormal
AbsentVariability+Baseline<110
or
AbsentVariability+LateorVariableDecels
NICHD 2008 Categories
CATEGORYI
Normal
Baseline110‐160
andModerateVariability
andNoLateorVariableDecels
Accels&EarlyDecelspresentorabsent
PredicEveof
normalpH.
Ac9on:
RouEnecare
CATEGORYII
Indeterminate
CATEGORYIII
Abnormal
AbsentVariability+Baseline<110
or
AbsentVariability+LateorVariableDecels
PredicEveof
abnormalpH.
Ac9on:
Immediate
remedies
NICHD 2008 Categories
CATEGORYI
Normal
Baseline110‐160
andModerateVariability
andNoLateorVariableDecels
Accels&EarlyDecelspresentorabsent
PredicEveof
normalpH.
Ac9on:
RouEnecare
CATEGORYII
Indeterminate
Baseline<110or>160
orVariabilityabsent,minimal,ormarked
orAccels–noneanersEmulaEon
oranyoftheseDecels:• Variablewithslowreturn,shoulders,orovershoots
• Variableswithminormodvariability
• Lateswithmoderatevariability
• Prolongeddecel>2min
CATEGORYIII
Abnormal
AbsentVariability+Baseline<110
or
AbsentVariability+LateorVariableDecels
PredicEveof
abnormalpH.
Ac9on:
Immediate
remedies
NICHD 2008 Categories
CATEGORYI
Normal
Baseline110‐160
andModerateVariability
andNoLateorVariableDecels
Accels&EarlyDecelspresentorabsent
PredicEveof
normalpH.
Ac9on:
RouEnecare
CATEGORYII
Indeterminate
Baseline<110or>160
orVariabilityabsent,minimal,ormarked
orAccels–noneanersEmulaEon
oranyoftheseDecels:• Variablewithslowreturn,shoulders,orovershoots
• Variableswithminormodvariability
• Lateswithmoderatevariability
• Prolongeddecel>2min
NotpredicEveof
pHstatus.
Ac9ons:
1.Longer
surveillance+/‐
othertesEng
and
2.Re‐evaluaEon
CATEGORYIII
Abnormal
AbsentVariability+Baseline<110
or
AbsentVariability+LateorVariableDecels
PredicEveof
abnormalpH.
Ac9on:
Immediate
remedies
NICHD Categories & Physiology
CATEGORYI
Normal
Baseline110‐160
andModerateVariability
andNoLateorVariableDecels
Accels&EarlyDecelspresentorabsent
PredicEveof
normalpH.
Ac9on:
RouEnecare
CATEGORYII
Indeterminate
Baseline<110or>160
orVariabilityabsent,minimal,ormarked
orAccels–noneanersEmulaEon
oranyoftheseDecels:• Variablewithslowreturn,shoulders,orovershoots
• Variableswithminormodvariability
• Lateswithmoderatevariability
• Prolongeddecel>2min
NotpredicEveof
pHstatus.
Ac9ons:
1.Longer
surveillance+/‐
othertesEng
and
2.Re‐evaluaEon
CATEGORYIII
Abnormal
AbsentVariability+Baseline<110
or
AbsentVariability+LateorVariableDecels
PredicEveof
abnormalpH.
Ac9on:
Immediate
remedies
NICHD 2008 Categories
CATEGORYI
Normal
Baseline110‐160
andModerateVariability
andNoLateorVariableDecels
Accels&EarlyDecelspresentorabsent
PredicEveof
normalpH.
Ac9on:
RouEnecare
CATEGORYII
Indeterminate
Baseline<110or>160
orVariabilityabsent,minimal,ormarked
orAccels–noneanersEmulaEon
oranyoftheseDecels:• Variablewithslowreturn,shoulders,orovershoots
• Variableswithminormodvariability
• Lateswithmoderatevariability
• Prolongeddecel>2min
NotpredicEveof
pHstatus.
Ac9ons:
1.Longer
surveillance+/‐
othertesEng
and
2.Re‐evaluaEon
CATEGORYIII
Abnormal
AbsentVariability+Baseline<110
or
AbsentVariability+LateorVariableDecels
PredicEveof
abnormalpH.
Ac9on:
Immediate
remedies
TheNICHDC
ategoriesar
enotappro
priate
forantepart
umsurveillance
(NSTs).
Butthephysiologicalconcepts&otherterminologyarerelevant.
Terminology for NSTs
• “Accelerations” o 15x15
o 10x10forpreterm<32weeks
• ‘NST’isinappropriatefor<28weeks
• Baseline, variability, decels, … o Sameterminology,withknowledgeoftermvs.
pretermphysiologyinformingyourAssessment.
o SomedecelscanonlybedefinedwithcontracEons
present,soknowthephysiology&theproperuse
oftheterms.
Accelerations (“Accels”)
ThiswebsitehasexcellentpicturesandEFMstrips,many
thatyoucanclicktowatchscrollonthescreen.
CenterforExperienEalLearning,QuillenCollegeof
Medicine,EastTennesseeStateUniversityuElis.net/wm/
photoremoved
Nonperiodic Accelerations (donotoccurinapahernwithcontracEons)
What’sthephy
siology?
Well‐oxygenate
dheart,brain
,&adrenals.
photoremoved
.Periodic Accelerations (occurregularlywithcontracEons)
What’sthep
hysiology?
Cordcompression
–theseare‘ups
idedownvariab
les’.
Alihlesqueeze
oftheumbilicalve
incausesanacc
el,
whileastronger
squeezeoftheu
mbilicalvein+arte
rycausesadece
l.
photoremoved
Accelerations? Theseriseoffthebaselinebutdonotmeetthecriteriaof15beatsabovebaselineat
theacmeeventhoughtheyaremorethan15secondsatthebase.
What’sthephysiology?
Fetus<32weeks?Sleepingfetusundernormalstress?CompensaEonduetosomestress?(cordcompression,oligohydramnios,smoking,drugs,…)Somethingelse?
photoremoved
Are there accelerations?
What’sthephysiology?
Fetus>32wksor<32wks?
Baseline120‐125,modvariability,nodecels.
Need2accelstoreach>135‐140.
NotreacEveatthispoint–butcannotsayif
fetusisundernormalstressornot.
MightconsidersEmulaEonto‘wakebabyup’
photoremoved
Stimulation for Accelerations
SomeEmes30‐60minuteshavepassed,allelselooks
okay,butno15x15accelshavebeenidenEfied.
• Techniquestotryto“wake”thebabyup:
– Massagingor‘jiggling’thematernalabdomen
– ChangematernalposiEon
– Juiceorothercold/glucosefooditems
– Noise(clapping,music,vibroacousEcsEmulaEon)
– Light(halogenispopular)
– RubpresenEngpartinvagina(‘scalpsEm’)
– Others?
88decibelsBetweena
garbage
disposal&
apower
mower.
photoremoved
photoremoved
NST Assessment Terminology “Reactive” 2accelswithin20minofeachother
“Nonreactive” doesnotmeetreacEvecriteria
‘Reaffirmed’in2
012withoutc
hanges.
NST Assessment Terminology “Reactive” 2accelswithin20minofeachother
“Nonreactive” doesnotmeetreacEvecriteria
Othertermsonenusedbutarenotstandardized:
– Equivocal
– Unsatisfactory
– Suspicious
– Indeterminate
– Abnormal
What can the midwife conclude from an NST?
Remember our Goals:
1. Toiden9fyifthereispossiblestressto
fetaloxygena9on&threatstoacid‐
base(pH)status.
‘Reac9veNST’withanormalbaseline+moderate
variability+nodecelsindicatesthatfetalwell‐
beingispresent.
Anythingelseisnotinterpretablewithoutfurther
surveillance–babymayormaynotbeina
situaEonwhereoxygenaEoniscompromised.
What can the midwife conclude from an NST?
Remember our Goals:
1. Toiden9fyifthereispossiblestressto
fetaloxygena9on&threatstoacid‐
base(pH)status.
‘Reac9veNST’withanormalbaseline+moderate
variability+nodecelsindicatesthatfetalwell‐
beingispresent.
Anythingelseisnotinterpretablewithoutfurther
surveillance–babymayormaynotbeina
situaEonwhereoxygenaEoniscompromised.
The NST is a
SCREENING test
,
not a DIAGNOSTIC te
st.
What can the Midwife predict from an NST?
Remember our Goals:
2.Topreventintrauterineasphyxiaand
fetal/neonatalorgandamageordeath.Althoughcontrolledresearchstudiesarefewand
‘evidence’basedonresearchisweak,anecdotal
experienceand‘expertopinion’perpetuateastrong
beliefintheNSTasascreeningtest.
ReacEveNST‐predicEveinthemomentandnearfuture.
NonreacEveNSTorotherconcerns‐youdon’tknowand
youcan’tpredictanything.
Commonlyreportedsta9s9cs:
Reac9veNST=fetaldeathrateof<5/1000
Nonreac9veNST=fetaldeathrateof40/1000
Cochrane Systematic Review Grivell et al., 2010
• 6studies,N=2105women
• Studieswerenothighquality,
allfromthe1980s&1990s
• AntepartumNSTwithEFM(“CTG”)vs.noEFM
• Results:
– PerinatalMortality:nostaEsEcallysignificantdifference,n=1627
– Cesarean:nostaEsEcallysignificantdifference,n=1279
• Conclusion–norecentorhighqualityexperimental
researchevidencetosupporttheuseofNSTs.
Ithasbeendifficulttodemonstratethat
EFMisindicatedorsuperiortootherforms
offetalsurveillancewithRCTs.
Butitis‘thestandardofcare’inmany
clinicalsitua9ons,somidwivesmust
understandit&iftheyuseit,todoso
wisely.
Interpretations & Actions • Reac9veNST(normal,reassuring):
– AcEons:
» FetalmovementeducaEoninlaherhalfofpregnancy
» Informwhentoreturnfornextvisit
• Indeterminate–atemporaryassessment,notafinalassessment.
Needmoreinfobeforedeciding.Timelimit:2hours.
• Nonreac9ve&/orOtherNonemergentConcerns (fetuscompensaEngforsomekindofstress):
– AcEons:
» Consultwithphysician,probablyreferforfurtherassessment.
» PosiEonchange,hydraEon?
» Extendedmonitoring+/‐US(BPP)
• Nonreac9ve&/orEmergentConcerns(fetusdecompensaEng):
– AcEons:
» ImmediateposiEonchange,hydraEon,O2
» ImmediatereferraltoL&Dhospital
NST Documentation 1. Maternalname,age,G/P
2. GestaEonalAge
3. Maternalriskfactorsrelevanttofetalcompromise
4. Fetalriskfactorsrelevanttofetalcompromise
5. Maternalvitalsigns(minimum:BP&*Pulse*)
6. CharacterisEcsof‘thestrip’
ContracEons–regularity,maternalpercepEon,strength
FHR–baseline,variability,accels,decels,anythingunusual
7. InterpretaEon/Assessment
ReacEveorNonreacEve(urgency)
8. AcEons&Plan–followsfromassessment&riskfactoreval
Date/Time S: Pam called this a.m. to report decreased FM x2h. Baby is ‘usually
active in the morning’. She reclined, drank juice, counted 4 ‘small’ movements over the next hour. No ctxs, back ache, bldg, LOF, pain, fever, or other s/sx. Was asked to come to clinic now for eval.
O: 29 yo G1P0 GA 372 based on LNMP & 12 wk US. No pg risk factors except Rh- & GBS+. NKDA.
BP 128/72 P 86 T 98.2 FH 37.5 cm Abd NT. Cephalic by Leopold’s, FM noted w/ abd exam. NST: BL 130-135, mod variability, 3 accels >15x15 in 18 min, no
decels. 1 mild nonpainful ctx recorded.
A: IUP at 37+ wks, c/o decreased FM, no other risk factors Reactive NST
P: Reassurance given. Will cont to monitor FM & call if concerned. RTC for next reg scheduled PNV in 4 days.
~Signature
Date/0845 S: Pam called this a.m. to report decreased FM x2h. …Was asked to
come to clinic now for eval.
O: 29 yo G1P0 GA 372 based on LNMP & 12 wk US. No pg risk factors except Rh- & GBS+. NKDA. BP 128/72 P 86 T 98.2
FH 37.5 cm Abd NT. Cephalic by Leopold’s, FM not noted w/ exam. NST: BL 130-135, mod variability, no 15x15 accels in 60 min, 2
variable decels lasting 20-30 sec to nadir 90-100. 1 mild nonpainful ctx recorded. Position change from reclining to sidelying. Abd massage did not elicit an accel.
A: IUP at 37+ wks, c/o decreased FM, no other risk factors NonReactive NST + 2 variable decels
P: Reviewed nonreac NST results & concept of screening test-need for further evaluation. Pam states understanding, called partner Chris.
T.C. consult w/ Dr Smith – advises monitoring at Mercy Hosp L&D. I’ll call Pam &/or hosp in 1-2 hr to f/u.
Pam left for hosp at 10:15. ~Signature
Reducing Errors with EFM
EFMis“effec8veonlywhenusedin
accordancewithpublishedstandardsand
guidelinesbyprofessionalsskilledin
correctinterpreta8onandwhen
appropriate8melyinterven8onisbased
onthatinterpreta8on.”Simpson&Knox(2000)
photoremoved
Reducing Errors with EFM EFMis“effec8veonlywhenusedinaccordance
withpublishedstandardsandguidelinesby
professionalsskilledincorrectinterpreta@on
andwhenappropriate8melyinterven8onis
basedonthatinterpreta8on.”Simpson&Knox(2000)
Overthepast40years,EFMeduca8onhas
evolvedfroman‘on‐the‐job’RN‐onlytraining
approachtorequiringbothproviders&staff
todemonstrateformaleduca8onand
ongoingcompetency(similartoNRP).
EFM Certification • CerEficaEon
– coursesareusually1‐2dayswithanexam
– maintenanceeitherrequiresCEUsorexamretake
• BecomingarequirementacrossthenaEon
– Interdisciplinary(physicians,nurses,midwives)
• ineducaEonalprograms(CNMs)
• forhiring
• conEnuedcerEficaEon(every2‐3years)
• PublishedreportsareappearingthatdescribeEFM
educaEon/cerEficaEonasamandatoryriskmanagement
acEvity.SomereportsarelinkingthiseducaEonto
improvedoutcomes.
photoremoved
EFM Certification ‘CerEficaEon’course
In‐person,notonline,is
bestfor1stEme
SomeonlyletMDs,RNs,
CNMstakeexam
NST Informed Consent Please share your informed consent discussion
• Verbal?
• Wrihen?
• Signed?
• Differentinfofor
recommendingor
advisingtheNSTvs.
performingtheNST?
photoremoved
Writing Practice GuidelinesIndica9onsforNST
IniEaEon,frequency
InformedConsent
CriteriaforAssessment
Defineyourterms!
‐ReacEve
‐NonreacEve
‐Others(‘indeterminate’)
CriteriaforDocumenta9on
Indica9onsforConsultaEon,Co‐management,Referral
• Decreasedfetalmovement• Imminentposhermorposherm• Hxofobstetricalproblem
o SEllbirth
o LBW
o Others• CurrentmedicalorOBproblem
o GDM
o HTN
o Almostanything!• Reassurance
photoremoved
NST Practice Guidelines • DecreasedFetalMovement
– IniEaEon–samedayasthereportofdecreasedFM(ifnoFM
anertheusualeffortsoflyingdowndrinkjuicecountlonger)
– Frequency–once,intheabsenceofotherriskfactors
• PendingPos`erm
– IniEaEon–41wkscompletedgestaEon(somestartat40½)
– Frequency–q3‐4daysunElbirth
• MedicalorOBRiskFactors(hxorcurrent)
– IniEaEon–perconsultaEonwithMD,usuallysomeEme
between32‐36weeks
– Frequency–perconsultaEon,usuallyweekly
Strip Review • CenterforExperienEalLearning,QuillenCollege
ofMedicine,EastTennesseeStateUniversity
uElis.net/wm/hasexcellentpicturesandEFMstrips,
manythatyoucanclicktowatchscrollonthe
screen.
Take Home Messages • KnowwhenanNSTisindicated:maternal/fetal
physiology&riskfactors.
• Demonstrateappropriatetrainingbefore
performing&interpreEngNSTs.
• InformedConsent:NSTsareforscreeningonly.
• DeveloppracEceguidelinesthatreflectthe
recogniEonofthescreeningnatureofNSTs,and
theconsultaEon&referralindicators&resources
ofyourparEcularpracEce.
• Documentthoroughly,withaplanthatreflectsthe
normalcyorurgencyoftheAssessment.