Nonprofit Newsletter - December 2012
-
Upload
singerlewak -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Nonprofit Newsletter - December 2012
December 2012
NONPROFIT HOT TOPICS____________________________________________________________
The Impact of the Fiscal Cliff on the Nonprofit Sector and the Future of the Tax Deduction for Charitable Donations
____________________________________________________________
Notice 2012-52: Charitable Contributions to Domestic Disregarded Entities
From Our Partners
ASKING GREAT QUESTIONS
NONPROFIT NEWSLETTER
ContentsDecember 2012
1 | SingerLewak December 2012
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FROM OUR PARTNERS2 ASKING GRE AT QUEST IONS
Asking questions is a human trait baked into our DNA. Aren’t we all curious from birth? Of course we are. Most kids have probably asked a million questions by age 10. If we’re lucky, as we grow older we never lose that curiosity and we continue to love asking questions all our lives.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NONPROFIT HOT TOPICS4 THE IMPACT OF THE F ISCAL CL IFF ON THE NONPROF IT
SECTOR AND THE FUTURE OF THE TA X DEDUCT ION FOR CHARITABLE DONAT IONSDespite the holiday season, the end of 2012 is bringing new anxieties to Nonprofit Organizations. As the “fiscal cliff” looms this coming January, Nonprofits are wary of not only cuts to direct Federal funding for programs, but also the potential impact of changed tax realities impacting the willingness of the public to give.
6 NOT ICE 2012-52: CHARITABLE CONTRIBUT IONS TO DOMEST IC DISREGARDED ENT I T IESThis notice provides guidance on the deductibility of contributions to domestic single-member limited liability companies (“SMLLC�) that is considered to be disregarded for federal tax purposes that are wholly owned and controlled by an exempt organization described in § 170(c)(2).
F R O M O U R PA R T N E R S
ASKING GREAT QUESTIONSBY LEWIS SHARPSTONE | [email protected]
Asking questions is a human trait baked into our DNA. Aren’t we all curious from birth? Of course we are. Most kids have probably asked a million questions by age 10. If we’re lucky, as we grow older, we never lose that curiosity and we continue to love asking questions all our lives.
Someone once told me that if you’re participating in a meeting, asking the right question is often more important than knowing what to say. I think there’s a lot of truth to this. In more than 20 years at SingerLewak, some of my most memorable moments were from questions clients had asked in meetings.
One time, I was conducting an audit exit conference with an Audit Committee, and at the end when I asked for questions, someone who had been pretty quiet for the presentation asked the following: “What, in your experience, is the number one thing a Nonprofit can do to prevent fraud, and are we doing it?”. A great question which lead to a great discussion. (Please do e-mail me if you want to know how I answered it!)
Another time, also at an audit
exit conference, I was going through the balance sheet and a nice Board Member stopped me and asked, “Did you say that the balance sheet lists out our assets and our liabilities?.” “Yes,” I answered. He went on, “...so last month I asked the Executive Director what was this organization’s most important asset, and he replied it was our workforce. Where is that on our balance sheet?” I replied that accounting doesn’t “recognize” the workforce as an asset. He turned to the Executive Director and asked, “so how do we recognize our employees?” From there, a short but wonderful discussion ensued and the Board and management soon afterwards established an enhanced employee kudos and recognition program. Nonprofit now has amongst the lowest of staff turnover rates. It all stemmed from a great question.
When I’m giving a presentation, if someone starts a question with, “I know I’m not an accountant but...”, I can be sure I’m about to be “hit” with a great question.
I have one audit committee member of a client that asks me every year “so, Lewis, you’re our CPA but if you were in our shoes what would you be most worried about around here?” What a great question! I’m always ready for him!
As anyone who has ever taught or presented knows, as you teach, so you learn. How does that happen? It’s through the process of the students or seminar participants asking questions. Their questions make you think. When someone asks you a question, it makes you look at your own material in a different way, through their eyes.
December 2012 SingerLewak | 2
Someone once told me that if you’re participating in a meeting, asking the right
question is often more important than knowing
what to say.
3 | SingerLewak December 2012
Dan Rockwell has a piece on the web entitled “The 10 Best Questions Ever”. He reminds us that asking a question, assuming it’s done in the correct spirit, honors the askee and builds relationships. Questions usually enhance opportunities and help reach higher levels. He reminds us of the golden rule when asking a question: Always follow a question with silence! He gives us three questions you can almost always ask at any meeting:
• At the beginning of a meeting, if it’s not clear, ask “so why are we here?”
• At the end of a meeting, if it’s not clear, ask, “so who does what, by when?”
• Almost anytime an issue is be-ing discussed, a great question to ask is “so how can I help?”
In conclusion, I’m reminded of the mother of a dear friend of mine who always seemed to answer questions with another question. So I asked her why she did that. You know how she answered? “Do I really?”!
I wish you all a happy, peaceful and successful 2013. Please enjoy SingerLewak’s December 2012 Nonprofit Newsletter.
LEWIS SHARPSTONE CAN BE REACHED AT
[email protected] OR 310.477.3924
He reminds us that asking a question,
assuming it’s done in the correct spirit, honors
the askee and builds relationships.
THE IMPACT OF THE FISCAL CLIFF ON THE NONPROFIT SECTOR AND THE FUTURE OF THE TAX DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE DONATIONSBY MIKE BARLOEWEN | SENIOR [email protected]
Despite the holiday season, the end of 2012 is bringing new anxieties to Nonprofit Organiza-tions. As the “fiscal cliff” looms this coming January, Nonprof-its are wary of not only cuts to direct Federal funding for programs, but also the potential impact of changed tax realities impacting the willingness of the public to give. These anxieties are leaving visions of a New Year with fewer donations received, lower Federal and State fund-ing and the possibility of being overwhelmed by the needs of an underserved public.
The first threat comes from the automatic $54.6 billion across-the-board sequestration cuts scheduled to occur on January 2, 2013. If there is no deal to avert the fiscal cliff, these spend-ing cuts to domestic programs are expected to both increase the public’s demand for services pro-vided by Nonprofits and simulta-neously reduce funds for govern-ments to pay their contracts with Nonprofits. The arbitrary and
across-the-board spending cuts of 8% to 10% affect virtually every domestic program.
The second threat comes from Congress and the President’s potential averting of the fiscal cliff – whether permanently or with a short-term fix. First sug-gested during the presidential campaign by Governor Romney, policymakers are giving serious consideration to a “bi-partisan” proposal to cap all itemized deductions at a specific level, such as $17,000 or $25,000 per individual taxpayer. Considering that the national average for all deductions – healthcare, mort-
gage interest, state/local taxes paid, and charitable giving – is more than $26,000. Such a cap could eliminate or severely reduce any tax incentive for donations to charities.
Nonprofits have been almost unanimously opposed to pro-posals to alter the charitable deduction and, according to the New York Times, resistant to
N O N P R O F I T H O T T O P I C S
December 2012 SingerLewak | 4
If there is no deal to avert the fiscal cliff, these spending cuts to domestic programs are expected to both increase the public’s
demand for services provided by Nonprofits
and simultaneously reduce funds for governments to pay their contracts with
Nonprofits
5 | SingerLewak December 2012
the White House’s suggestion that they press Boehner and the Republicans on tax rates. Deduc-tions for charitable contributions totaled more than $38 billion in 2010. While proposals to limit the tax break have been made before, included in President Obama’s budget proposals, this
renewed focus on the basic line-item deduction has burst into the national spotlight in the current federal deficit talks. It has be-come a hot topic in the media, blogosphere and on social net-working sites. Lobbying records show that since Obama first proposed to lower the deduction in 2009, more than 60 Non-profit groups have spent at least $21 million lobbying Congress and the White House to preserve it. Although nonprofit officials characterize the effort as grass roots, at least 25 organizations have hired Washington area lob-bying firms.
The uncertainty surrounding the future of the tax benefits of charitable giving might lead to a short term increase in donations as tax payers rush to make con-tributions in 2012 ahead of any changes that may take effect.
The question politicians are wres-tling with, as we head closer and closer to the fiscal cliff, is whether the value to Nonprofits and the community outweighs the cost of the charitable tax deduction to the federal budget. Concerned Nonprofits should find a voice in this debate to ensure that its interests are being served.
MIKE BARLOEWEN CAN BE REACHED AT
[email protected] OR 818.999.3924
The uncertainty surrounding the future
of the tax benefits of charitable giving might
lead to a short term increase in donations as tax payers rush to make contributions in 2012
ahead of any changes that may take effect
NOTICE 2012-52: CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS TO DOMESTIC DISREGARDED ENTITIESBY LIOR TEMKIN | [email protected]
This notice provides guidance on the deductibility of contributions to domestic single-member limited liability companies (“SMLLC”) that is considered to be disregarded for federal tax purposes that are wholly owned and controlled by an exempt organization described in § 170(c)(2).
Section 170(a) allows as a deduction any charitable contribution, as defined in § 170(c). Section 170(c)(2) in part
defines the term “charitable contribution” as a contribution or gift to or for the use of a corporation, trust, or community chest, fund, or foundation--
1. Created or organized in the U.S. or in any possession thereof, or under the law of the U.S., any State, the District of Columbia, or any possession of the U.S.;
2. Organized and operated exclu-sively for specified purposes, including religious, charitable, scientific, literary or educa-tional purposes;
3. No part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual; and
4. Which is not disqualified for tax exemption under § 501(c)(3) by reason of attempting to influence legislation or partici-pating in a political campaign.
If all requirements of § 170 listed above are met, the IRS will treat a contribution to a disregarded SMLLC that was created or organized in or under the law of the U.S. as a charitable contribution to a branch or division of the U.S. charity. To prevent inquiries by the IRS, the charity is encouraged to acknowledge that the SMLLC which received the funds is wholly owned by the U.S. charity and treated by the U.S. charity as a disregarded entity.
The effective date of this notice is for charitable contributions made on or after July 31, 2012.
N O N P R O F I T H O T T O P I C S
If all requirements of § 170 listed above are met, the IRS will treat
a contribution to a disregarded SMLLC that was created or organized in or under the law of
the U.S. as a charitable contribution to a branch or division of the U.S.
charity
December 2012 SingerLewak | 6
LIOR TEMKIN CAN BE REACHED AT
[email protected] OR 310.477.3924
SingerLewak is a leading regional accounting services firm in California with offices in Los Angeles, Orange County, Wood-land Hills, Monterey Park, San Diego, Silicon Valley and San Francisco. Serving California since 1959, SingerLewak has established a reputation for excellence as professionals with expertise in the Accounting and Management Consulting industry. Providing the services of a large firm with a blended environment of practices, industry specializations and partic-ular attention to hands-on service, SingerLewak continues to demonstrate leadership and industry growth year-over-year.
We are nationally recognized as active community and profes-sional services partners, working among many sectors of the business world. Our core services deliver results whether it’s auditing, accounting, entrepreneurial business services, tax preparation, business management, SEC filings, transactions, enterprise risk management, forensic accounting, business valuation, litigation support, or consulting.
OUR FIRM
OUR NEWSLETTERS
TO SIGN UP FOR NE WSLE T TERS, PLE ASE V IS I T S INGERLE WAK .COM/CONTACT
SINGERLEWAKNEWSLETTER
NONPROFIT
CFOESSENTIALS
TAX BRIEF
ENTREPRENEUR & FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESSES
AIR NEWSLETTER
THE SKILLS YOU NEED. THE SERVICE YOU EXPECT.