None of this whatsoever has been proven. But that’s what fun about it.
-
Upload
jesse-barton -
Category
Documents
-
view
243 -
download
0
Transcript of None of this whatsoever has been proven. But that’s what fun about it.
Avalanches….None of this whatsoever has been proven.
But that’s what fun about it
…at the CMB
MANTLE
CORE
MANTLE
Richard. A. Muller- hero.http://muller.lbl.gov/
Avalanches at the Core-Mantle Boundary, Geophysical Research Letters, vol 29 pp 41-1 to 41-4 (2002)
Earth Structure- the CMB and D’’
How will they FORM I hear you say?
Please don’t let Charlie bite my
finger…
70% of density change as liquid core solidifies is due to exclusion of lighter element exclusion- leads to convection.
Excluded light elements remain in solution and freeze out as they rise (1000oC temp drop I.C to CMB)
Light elements fall like snow onto undulating surface of CMB
Gathers like snow…how nice… Exceeding the angle of repose will cause slumping,
bringing core liquid with it. Only need a few degrees slope. Shear stress causes slumping- oblique impact?
Let it snow, let it snow…
Must be oblique Consider, for example, a comet with
velocity 25 km/sec, radius 5 km ΔΩ = mvR/I If the magnetic field of the core is coupled
to entrained Fe in the sediment, sudden acceleration could cause an avalanche.
Meteor Impact
What would they DO I hear you say?
Trigger the disturbance of the geodynamo◦ Implications for magnetic reversals
Consequence numero uno
Slumping Heat re-distribution as cool precipitate mixes with hot liquid Fe, cooling the Fe and letting it fall due to density increase.
This may disturb large convection cells of the outer core, reduce the overall scale of flow and even change the dipole component.
Cells in close association may be also affected, driving an overall shut down of the geodynamo
Geodynamo
When the convective cells re-establish themselves, there is a 50% chance the magnetic field will reform in the reversed direction.
Geodynamo cont…
Help. I have absolutely no
idea where the hell I am
I’m lost too mate…must be the geodynamo again. Game of
chess?
Mantle Plume initiation◦ The part of the mantle
that lost the ‘sediment’ blanket is exposed to hot Fe and rapidly heated Maybe only from the
largest of avalanches (thickness >>100m)
Consequence numero dos
Mantle plume initiation Flood Basalts and Kimberlites
Consequence numero dos
Mantle plume initiation Flood Basalts and Kimberlites
If several avalanches are coupled from an intense impact, could result in separate but simultaneous plumes e.g simultaneous but spatially distant plumes at 61-62Ma (Larson et al. 1999)
Meteor impacts and flood basalts have long been possible explanations for mass extinctions.
Flood basalts almost always seem to post-date the main phase of extinction
This would be satisfied by the impact avalanche model
A grand unified theory- MASS EXTINCTIONS
TIME??? Mantle plumes take millions of years to reach the surface- would destroy correlations.
Kimberlite rates- 300km/s?
Reversal in fall back breccia of 24-km Reis impact crater.
No reversal occurs with Chicxulub crater◦ Ooooooooooo…..
◦ High iridium suggests impact was vertical (would have been ejected to space if oblique)??
Evidence for linking reversals to impacts
120-85Ma has no magnetic reversals Linked to mantle plume activity (Larson and
Olsen 1991) which created Ontong-Java plateau
The LARGEST, yes, the largest, volcanic province on Earth. Alaska, 30Km thick.
Geomagnetic quiet periods
Multiple avalanches…
Slope recharge after 35Ma
Crater subduction- candidates?
Marine Extinction peak at 120Ma
Decadal variations in avalanching◦ Small avalanches more likely and thus common
than larger ones
Links to the Chandler Wobble?