Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions
description
Transcript of Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions
Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions
Enrique Fernández-Martínez MPI für Physik Munich
Non-unitarity and NSI
Generic new physics affecting n oscillations can beparameterized as 4-fermion Non-Standard Interactions:
fPflPG RLLF ,22
n
Production or detection of a n associated to a l
So that
The general matrix N can be parameterized as: UN 1 where †
Also gives but with *
p → nt
n n → p t
Non-unitarity and NSI matter effects
Non-Standard n scattering off matter can also be parameterized as 4-fermion Non-Standard Interactions:
fPfPG RLLm
F ,22
nn
Integrating out the W and Z, 4-fermion operators are obtained also for the non-unitary mixing matrix They are related to the production and detection NSI
so that
Non-unitarity and NSI matter effects
Integrating out the W and Z, 4-fermion operators for matter NSI are obtained from non-unitary mixing matrix
They are related to the production and detection NSI
fPfPG RLLm
F ,22
nn
enenene
enenene
eneeneeneem
nnnnnnnnnnnn
nnnnnn
tttt
t
t
11
112
Direct bounds on prod/det NSI
C. Biggio, M. Blennow and EFM 0907.0097
dPuPlG RLLud
F ,22
n
13.0013.0087.0013.01.0106.2042.0025.0042.0
5ud
ePPG LLe
F
nn22
03.003.0025.003.003.0025.003.003.0025.0
e
From , , p decays and zero distance oscillations
Bounds order ~10-2
5.01.044.01.003.01.0
44.01.014.0em
Direct bounds on matter NSI
If matter NSI are uncorrelated to production and detectiondirect bounds are mainly from n scattering off e and nuclei
S. Davidson, C. Peña garay, N. Rius and A. Santamaria hep-ph/0302093J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda, C. A. Moura and J. W. F. Valle hep-ph/0512195
J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda, C. A. Moura and J. W. F. Valle 0711.0698C. Biggio, M. Blennow and EFM 0902.0607
fPfPG RLLm
F ,22
nn
Rather weak bounds… …can they be saturated avoiding additional constraints?
305.05.005.0008.005.05.005.01
um
605.05.005.0015.005.05.005.06.0
dm
Gauge invariance
However fPfPG RLLm
F ,22
nn
is related to fPflPlG RLLm
F ,22
by gauge invariance and very strong bounds exist
→ e → e in nucleit decays
S. Bergmann et al. hep-ph/0004049Z. Berezhiani and A. Rossi hep-ph/0111147
See Toshi’s talk
Large NSI?
We searched for gauge invariant SM extensions satisfying:
Matter NSI are generated at tree level
4-charged fermion ops not generated at the same level
No cancellations between diagrams with different messenger particles to avoid constraints
The Higgs Mechanism is responsible for EWSBS. Antusch, J. Baumann and EFM 0807.1003
Large NSI?
At d=6 only one possibility: charged scalar singlet
M. Bilenky and A. Santamaria hep-ph/9310302
cc LiLLiL 22
Present in Zee model orR-parity violating SUSY
Large NSI?
Very constrained:
F. Cuypers and S. Davidson hep-ph/9310302S. Antusch, J. Baumann and EFM 0807.1003
→ e decays t decaysCKM unitarity
Since l = -l only , t and tt ≠0
Large NSI?
At d=8 more freedomCan add 2 H to break the symmetry between n and l with the
vev
There are 3 topologies to induce effective d=8 ops with HHLLff legs:
-v2/2 ff
nn ffLiHHiL t
2
*2
Z. Berezhiani and A. Rossi hep-ph/0111147; S. Davidson et al hep-ph/0302093
Large NSI?
We found three classes satisfying the requirements:
Large NSI?
We found three classes satisfying the requirements:
Just contributes to the scalar propagator after EWSB
Same as the d=6 realization with the scalar singletv2/2 cc LiLLiL 22
1
Large NSI?
We found three classes satisfying the requirements:
The Higgs coupled to the NR selects n after EWSB
-v2/2 ff
nn ffLiHHiL t
2
*2
2
Large NSI?
But can be related to non-unitarity and constrained
122
†22
NNMYv
MYv
i i i
i
i
i 122
†
22
NNMYv
MYv
j j j
j
j
j
Fij G10
2
Large NSI?
For the matter NSI
Where is the largest eigenvalue of
And additional source, detector and matter NSI aregenerated through non-unitarity by the d=6 op
Large NSI?
We found three classes satisfying the requirements:
Mixed case, Higgs selects one n and scalar singlet S the other
3
Large NSI?
Can be related to non-unitarity and the d=6 antisymmetric op
3
122
†22
NNMYv
MYv
i i i
i
i
i j j Sj
j
Sj
j
Mv
Mv
2
2 ll
Fij G10
Large NSI?
At d=8 we found no new ways of selecting n
The d=6 constraints on non-unitarity and the scalar singlet
apply also to the d=8 realizations
What if we allow for cancellations among diagrams?
B. Gavela, D. Hernández, T. Ota and W. Winter 0809.3451
Large NSI?
B. Gavela, D. Hernández, T. Ota and W. Winter 0809.3451
Large NSI?
B. Gavela, D. Hernández, T. Ota and W. Winter 0809.3451
tick means selects n at d=8 without 4-charged fermion
bold means induces 4-charged fermionat d=6, have to cancel it!!
Large NSI?
There is always a 4 charged fermion op that needs canceling
Toy model
B. Gavela, D. Hernández, T. Ota and W. Winter 0809.3451
EELiHHiL t2
*2
Cancelling the 4-charged fermion ops.
NSI in loops Even if we arrange to have
We can close the Higgs loop, the triplet terms vanishes and
NSIs and 4 charged fermion ops induced with equal strength
Extra fine-tuning required at loop level to have k=0 or loop contribution dominates when 1/16p2 > v2/M2
EELiHHiLMO t
2*
24
tt EEHHLLHHLLMO ††
42
p
EELLkMO
2
2
4 162
C. Biggio, M. Blennow and EFM 0902.0607
Conclusions Models leading “naturally” to NSI imply:
O(10-3) bounds on the NSI
Relations between matter and production/detection NSI
Probing O(10-3) NSI at future facilities very challenging but not impossible, near detectors like MINSIS excellent probes
Saturating the mild model-independent bounds on matter NSI and decoupling them from production/detection requires strong fine tuning
Other models for n masses
Type I seesawMinkowski, Gell-Mann, Ramond, Slansky, Yanagida, Glashow, Mohapatra, Senjanovic, …
NR fermionic singlet
Type II seesawMagg, Wetterich, Lazarides, Shafi, Mohapatra, Senjanovic, Schecter, Valle, …
D scalar triplet
Type III seesawFoot, Lew, He, Joshi, Ma, Roy, Hambye et al., Bajc et al., Dorsner, Fileviez-Perez
SR fermionic triplet
Different d=6 ops
Type II: • LFV 4-fermions interactions
Type I: • non-unitary mixing in CC• FCNC for n
Type III:• non-unitary mixing in CC• FCNC for n• FCNC for charged leptons
A. Abada, C. Biggio, F. Bonnet, B. Gavela and T. Hambye 0707.4058
Types II and III induce flavour violation in the charged lepton sectorStronger constraints than in Type I
Low scale seesaws
But
DNtD mMmmd 1
5 n
NDND M
mmMmd n 2†6
so
!!!
Low scale seesaws
The d=5 and d=6 operators are independentApproximate U(1)L symmetry can keep d=5 (neutrino mass) small and allow for observable d=6 effects
See e.g. A. Abada, C. Biggio, F. Bonnet, B. Gavela and T. Hambye 0707.4058
Inverse (Type I) seesaw Type II seesaw L= 1 -1 1
DNNtD mMMmd 11
5
DND mMmd 2†6
25 4D
DD
MYd
2
†
6D
DDM
YYd
Magg, Wetterich, Lazarides, Shafi, Mohapatra, Senjanovic, Schecter, Valle,…
Wyler, Wolfenstein, Mohapatra, Valle, Bernabeu, Santamaría, Vidal, Mendez, González-García, Branco, Grimus, Lavoura, Kersten, Smirnov,….
<< M
Low scale seesaws
The d=5 and d=6 operators are independentApproximate U(1)L symmetry can keep d=5 (neutrino mass) small and allow for observable d=6 effects
See e.g. A. Abada, C. Biggio, F. Bonnet, B. Gavela and T. Hambye 0707.4058
Inverse (Type I) seesaw Type II seesaw L= 1 -1 1
DNNtD mMMmd 11
5
DND mMmd 2†6
25 4D
DD
MYd
2
†
6D
DDM
YYd
Magg, Wetterich, Lazarides, Shafi, Mohapatra, Senjanovic, Schecter, Valle,…
Wyler, Wolfenstein, Mohapatra, Valle, Bernabeu, Santamaría, Vidal, Mendez, González-García, Branco, Grimus, Lavoura, Kersten, Smirnov,….
<< M