Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list...

58
1 Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list. They were reviewed and it was decided that these nominations did not warrant inclusion on the local list. An explanation of why this decision was made is included on under the entry for the building, site or structure.

Transcript of Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list...

Page 1: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

1

Nominations not proposed for the local list

These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list. They were reviewed and

it was decided that these nominations did not warrant inclusion on the local list. An explanation of why this

decision was made is included on under the entry for the building, site or structure.

Page 2: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

2

Asset Details Description

Address: College House, Chiswick Mall Significance: Architectural, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N01

College House was built in 1992, architecturally in keeping with other houses in the neighbouring terrace constructed in 1875 to the West. It stands in the gap left between Field House and Thames Bank at the turn-of-the-century when there was a plan to build a road bridge over the Thames here.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The building, while nice, did not meet the criteria. While it blends in unobtrusively and takes inspiration from the houses around it, it does not in itself have architectural significance to warrant inclusion on the local list.

Address: Said House, Chiswick Mall Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape, Social Reference Number: N02

Said House evolved from a small C18th gardener’s cottage in the Victorian period. It was enlarged and ‘Georgianised’ in the 1930s. It is unclear whether this was detailed by the designer Mrs Darcy Braddell or by Albert Randall Wells (1877–1942), an English Arts and Crafts architect. It was then that the ‘galleon’ west wing was created. The extensive 1930s makeover which included the giant curved plate-glass window on the first floor was carried out for the actor-manager Sir Nigel Playfair (1874-1935), who was manager of the Lyric Theatre, Hammersmith, and lived here between 1931 and 1934. Viscount Davidson, Chairman of the Conservative Party (1927-30) and later Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, lived here from 1956 with his wife, a Member of Parliament who became an early life peeress as Baroness Northchurch of Chiswick. The house was featured as the 'home' for the contestants of the first series of the television programme The Apprentice in

2005.

Recommended for inclusion? No The building, while handsome, did not meet the criteria. While it does have architectural quality, it did not meet the criteria for historical, group/townscape or social significance. While a number of interesting people have inhabited the house, however it was not felt that satisfied the social or historical significance criteria. Nothing indicated that it had group/townscape character beyond forming part of the conservation area. It is still a positive contributor to the conservation area, however it does not merit local listing.

Page 3: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

3

Asset Details Description

Address: Group of 20th Century building on Church Street, including 6 Burlington Lane, Russett House, 21 Church Street, The Studio (20 Church St) Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N03

This group of 20th C. houses comprise No. 6 Burlington Lane, which together with Russett House, No. 21 and 20 Church St. (The Studio) present a unified grouping at the entrance to Church Street at the Hogarth roundabout, complementing the much older buildings on the eastern side, and providing a much-needed coherence at the north end of Church Street after many of the original buildings were demolished for road widening initiatives from the 1920s to the 1950s.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This group of buildings did not meet the criteria. While harmonious with the character of the conservation area they do not meet the criterial for architectural significance. These buildings also do not historical significance.

Asset Details Description

Address: Wembury House, 13 Grange Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N04

13 Grange Road stands on the head of the corner of the cul de sac opposite the terrace, reflecting its style in a sympathetic way. The house is two storeys plus accommodation in the roof-space, in red brick and clay roof tiles, it retains timber windows. Staggered plan form with canted element incorporating two storey brick detail projecting from the elevation addressing the corner of Grange Road opposite the entrance to Gunnersbury Station.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This building does not have the same architectural quality as the other houses on Grange Road which were recommended for inclusion. The building is still makes a positive contribution to the character of the conservation area.

Page 4: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

4

Asset Details Description

Address: Connolly's Bar, Chiswick High Road Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape, Social Reference Number: N05

Smaller red brick late Victorian public house with an interesting gable decorated with round whorls and distinctive stonework, in which the original pub name THE ROBIN HOOD is carved. Originally operated as the Robin Hood and Little John and opened in this location in 1897. The building stands out from the shopping parades on either side, which are generally plainer in style and it has a higher fascia, different floor to ceiling heights and a higher parapet than its neighbours. It thus provides a unique feature within the retail frontage in which it sits. Operated as an LGBT pub during the 1980s/90s, representing part of LGBTQ heritage in West London. Now operates as an Irish pub.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The building does not have sufficient architectural quality to be included. It is not a local landmark and does not have group/townscape significance. While its past use as an LGBT pub adds to its significance, it is no longer used in this function which diminishes its social significance. While it does not warrant inclusion on the local list, it does make a positive contribution to the conservation area.

Asset Details Description

Address: 41 Burlington Road Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N06

The building is an attractive feature in the townscape and is a good example of the larger Victorian villa development in the Conservation Area. It is a three-storey, double-fronted, detached Victorian villa which has two large gables to the front elevation, creating a sense of grandeur. The building’s first appearance on an OS map is in the 1896 edition. Burlington Road was formerly known as Brandenburgh Road and is present in the 1887/8 Kelly’s directory where no. 41 is named “Darna”, the residence of a Charles Murdoch.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This building does not meet the criteria for inclusion. The building did not meet the criteria for Historic and Group/Townscape significance. Additionally, the poor quality side extension detracts from the building. It is a conservation area so is protected via this designation and the building makes a positive contribution to the character of the conservation area.

Page 5: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

5

Asset Details Description

Address: 19-23 (odd) Wellesley Road Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N07

Group of characterful houses. No. 19 is a distinctive corner house, two storeys in red brick with a Victorian Gothic influence. It dates from the 1890s. There is a two-storey bay topped by a distinctive slate tiled turret with cast iron crest on the splayed corner at the junction of Grange Road and Wellesley Road. The top sashes in the arched, timber sliding-sash windows of the bays retain leaded lights and some slates to the turret are in a traditional fish scale shape. Nos. 21 and 23 are a pair of Victorian Gothic houses which form a terrace with No. 19.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although these buildings are handsome, they do not meet the criteria for local listing. They do not have historical significance as set out in the criteria and they do not have group/townscape significance as set out in the criteria. They are, however, positive contributors to the character of the conservation area and protected via this designation.

Asset Details Description

Address: 25-31 (odd) Wellesley Road Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N08

A group of detached two-storey double fronted villas, likely built in the 1870s. They reflect the Italianate influence on other residential properties built at the same period in the Conservation Area. Orchard House (No. 29) is an exception in that it features a grand projecting porch with windows in each side and a stone balustrade incorporating hollow circles. It has fine ironwork in the fanlight over the timber front door. Orchard House retains a cast iron gate with the name ‘The Orchard’ incorporated.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No It was felt that this group of houses is of a common type found in Chiswick and did not meet the criteria as set out in the guidance. They are in the Conservation area and are afforded certain protections via this designation.

Page 6: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

6

Asset Details Description

Address: 164 Duke Road Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N09

Chiswick's District Rate Book for December 1872 shows a 'House with Coach House etc. located on the Glebe Land' - this is the first time such an entry has appeared and is presumed to reflect date of build. Owner and presumed commissioner of this distinctive, one-off Victorian house was Elisha Cornish, a Master Oriental Printer with a business in London. Known to be a churchwarden at St. Alban the Martyr, Holborn in 1873, Elisha Cornish is presumed to have named this house St. Alban's Cottage/House shortly after moving in. This is a distinguished, and probably unique, good quality domestic property, which adds character to its setting and locality.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Permission to demolish this building was granted on appeal in 2017. It would therefore not be appropriate to include this on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: 402-406 Chiswick High Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N10

A group of two art deco building. 402 is a narrow three-storey brick built building, with an art deco style pediment. 404-406 is a two-storey rendered building with a similar style pediment. Both make a positive contribution to the character of the conservation area and are a good example of the art deco style on the high street.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although these buildings are nice, there are other, better, examples of art deco buildings proposed to be added to the local list.

Page 7: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

7

Asset Details Description

Address: 380 Chiswick High Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N11

Art Deco style building with interesting first floor design. The ground floor shop front has been an unsympathetic addition but the building at first floor level retains much of its architectural integrity. Part of a group of art deco buildings along the high street.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The architectural quality of this building has been compromised by an unsympathetic shop front and it does not meet the criteria.

Asset Details Description

Address: 356-362 Chiswick High Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N12

One of a group of 1930s group of shops along the high street. Red brick with white detailing.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although nice, these buildings do not satisfy the criteria for architectural quality for local listing.

Page 8: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

8

Asset Details Description

Address: 336-340 Chiswick High Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N13

1930s building on the high street. Retains its original crittal windows which adds to its character. Interesting decorative detailing on the first-floor level.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although the detailing and original windows add to the character of the building, the unsympathetic shop fronts have diminished its architectural quality.

Asset Details Description

Address: 332 Chiswick High Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N14

Part of a group of 1930s building along the high street.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The large fascia and the shop front detract from the quality of the building and it does not meet the criteria.

Page 9: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

9

Asset Details Description

Address: 167-179 Chiswick High Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N15

167-169 is a 1929 replacement for a Victorian shop built in red brick. An additional floor behind a mansard roof with dormer windows was given planning permission in 2002. 171-175 Chiswick High Road: Terrace rebuilt in 1905, stucco facade, slate roof, 20th century shop fronts at street level. Upper floor has shallow neo-classical blind arcade giving recesses for windows. 177 and 179 Chiswick High Road: 1930s replacement for a substantial Georgian pub, the Prince of Wales but no longer a pub. Red brick, tiled roof, neo-Georgian building with central dutch gable the central first floor window opening framed with a moulded stone (?) surround and broken pediment above, its contemporary wrought iron balcony incorporates Prince of Wales feathers.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The group, while characterful, was not felt to have sufficient architectural quality to satisfythe criteria to qualify for local listing.

Asset Details Description

Address: Barley Mow Passage and footpath continuing eastward to Duke's Ave Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N16

In the 18th century large villas or 'citizens' boxes', some of them quite grand, ran along what was then the important London to Bath road. The Chiswick Memorial Club, Afton House, Bourne Place, was one of these and is Listed Grade 2. The public path divided the villas from their front gardens; when these were built over with infill development in the 19th century, the access paths behind were retained.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Footpaths will not be considered for local listing.

Page 10: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

10

Asset Details Description

Address: Prospect House, 279 Chiswick High Road Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N16

Prospect House is one of the few surviving 'citizens' boxes' which once lined the High Road - it is now almost hidden. Rendered walls, slate roof, sash windows. Though surrounded by The Lamb (from 1749 The Barley Mow until changed in 2012) and the Whitman's Corner estate agents' offices, the 18th century house is still identifiable and is a noteworthy survival.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The integrity of the building has been compromised by insensitive additions.

Asset Details Description

Address: 78 Barrowgate Road Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N17

The largest and most substantial surviving suburban villa from late Victorian Chiswick, this house stands in what was one of the wealthiest roads in the parish. The building retains good detailing, including interesting brick detailing on the front façade and leaded glass windows to the rear. The house was built for Benjamin Hopkin Morris, to designs by Edwin Monson FRIBA. Morris and his wife, with three servants, had moved in by 1901. Hopkin Morris' left funds to restore the old almshouses at Strand on the Green, near The Bull's Head. The work, completed in 1933 at a cost of £801, is recorded on a commemorative stone on the building.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Permission was granted to demolish the building in 2018 and it would therefore not be appropriate to include it on the local list.

Page 11: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

11

Asset Details Description

Address: Oliver House Steps Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N18

In the 19th century an embankment wall was built along Strand on the Green with flights of steps provided in front of the important houses and public houses to the riverbed roadway for the carriage visitors and customers. This set of steps is placed centrally along the grand terrace of houses.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No We would consider these steps to be within the curtilage of the listed building.

Asset Details Description

Address: Steam Packet Steps opposite Café Rouge Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N19

In the 19th century an embankment wall was built along Strand on the Green with flights of steps provided in front of the important houses and public houses to the riverbed roadway for the carriage visitors and customers. This set of steps is named for the Steam Packet Public House (now Café Rouge).

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although an interesting feature of the area, they do not warrant inclusion on the local list. They are included with the Strand on the Green Conservation Area.

Page 12: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

12

Asset Details Description

Address: Bell and Crown Steps Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N20

In the 19th century an embankment wall was built along Strand on the Green with flights of steps provided in front of the important houses and public houses to the riverbed roadway for the carriage visitors and customers. These steps would have served the pub and row of shops which once sat along it.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although an interesting feature of the area, they do not warrant inclusion on the local list. They are included with the Strand on the Green Conservation Area.

Asset Details Description

Address: Zachary House Steps Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N21

In the 19th century an embankment wall was built along Strand on the Green with flights of steps provided in front of the important houses and public houses to the riverbed roadway for the carriage visitors and customers. The larger and grander houses usually had their own set of steps.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although an interesting feature of the area, they do not warrant inclusion on the local list. They are included with the Strand on the Green Conservation Area.

Page 13: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

13

Asset Details Description

Address: Ship House Steps Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N22

In the 19th century an embankment wall was built along Strand on the Green with flights of steps provided in front of the important houses and public houses to the riverbed roadway for the carriage visitors and customers. This set of steps was constructed in timber and no longer serviceable.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although an interesting feature of the area, they do not warrant inclusion on the local list. They are included with the Strand on the Green Conservation Area.

Asset Details Description

Address: City Barge River Steps Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N23

In the 19th century an embankment wall was built along Strand on the Green with flights of steps provided in front of the important houses and public houses to the riverbed roadway for the carriage visitors and customers.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although an interesting feature of the area, they do not warrant inclusion on the local list. They are included with the Strand on the Green Conservation Area.

Page 14: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

14

Asset Details Description

Address: Bulls Head River Steps Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N24

In the 19th century an embankment wall was built along Strand on the Green with flights of steps provided in front of the important houses and public houses to the riverbed roadway for the carriage visitors and customers. These steps are set at a right angle to the river, providing access to the pub for passengers and deliveries.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No We would consider these steps to be within the curtilage of a listed building.

Asset Details Description

Address: Hopkin Morris River Steps Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N25

In the 19th century an embankment wall was built along Strand on the Green with flights of steps provided in front of the important houses and public houses to the riverbed roadway for the carriage visitors and customers.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although an interesting feature of the area, they do not warrant inclusion on the local list. They are included with the Strand on the Green Conservation Area.

Page 15: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

15

Asset Details Description

Address: Strand on the Green House River Stairs Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N26

In the 19th century an embankment wall was built along Strand on the Green with flights of steps provided in front of the important houses and public houses to the riverbed roadway for the carriage visitors and customers.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No We would consider these steps to be within the curtilage of a listed building.

Asset Details Description

Address: Magnolia Wharf, Strand on the Green Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N27

Magnolia Wharf is a development of 14 houses built on the site of an old barge works belonging to the Steam Navigation Company in 1964. What is noticeable is the use of London stock brick and careful detailing in keeping with the heights and general scale of the area.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although not a negative feature of the area, it was felt that this group of buildings did not meet the criteria for inclusion.

Page 16: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

16

Asset Details Description

Address: 37a Hartington Road Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N28

House by Pierre Fowell Associates, 1987, built of brick, aerated concrete blocks, precast concrete and with a tiled roof on a narrow plot measuring 5 metres at the road and 9 metres at the river. This land had been intended for use as a road leading to a row of houses facing the Thames and parallel to Hartington Road, a development which did not take place, so was incorporated into the garden of no 37. The house was built for the owner of no 37, to which it is attached. the new house made a transition between the two neighbouring houses.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No There are other better examples of modern extensions to historic buildings inside conservation areas.

Asset Details Description

Address: Holly Lodge, 4 Bolton Road Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N29

Built about 1878, the house had an integral coach-house/stable; a lean-to garage was added on the north side in 1929. For some years the home of Pierre Fowell, the architect who has undertaken a number of extensions and also created new buildings in Grove Park, it has been carefully remodelled and extended. The former coach-house became the architects' studio in 1980 converted to later habitable space; the lean-to garage was also replaced with another small extension, in proportion to and with well designed details to

match the original house. Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This building is similar to many of those in the conservation area and it does not warrant inclusion on the local list.

Page 17: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

17

Asset Details Description

Address: Chiswick Staithe Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N30

69 houses designed primarily by Edward Armitage, who was a resident of Strand on the Green, of Green Lloyd & Sons in 1962-3 and built1964-5. The estate is composed of Brick and tile, some with timber cladding on gables. The riverside open space has a davit, an elegant bollard and steps to give pedestrian access to the foreshore as well as the opportunity for lowering a boat at high tide. The gardens feature a yellow stock brick column with stone cap, a short length of wall incorporating a stone quatrefoil, a garden wall with gothic arch and a fine Victorian cast iron and timber gate, all reused features from previous properties.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Not appropriate to include large housing estates on the local list. This estate is within the conservation area, which is the appropriate designation for a large group such as this.

Asset Details Description

Address: The Falcon School for Boys, 2 Burnaby Gardens Significance: Architectural, Social, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N31

Large imposing Victorian building, now used as a school.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This building is similar to many in the area and does not warrant inclusion on the local list.

Page 18: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

18

Asset Details Description

Address: 40 Oxford Road South Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N32

A highly decorated detached house, with intricate plaster details.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, it was felt that this building was similar to many in the area and should not be included on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: 533 Staines Road Significance: Group/Townscape, Social Reference Number: N33

This building is almost 120 years old and formed the beginning of Bedfont Parade, Formerly Moore’s Post Office.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Not the best example of a historic shopping parade in the borough, there are other better examples of shopping parades in the borough. This one has suffered a number of insensitive alterations which have had a detrimental effect on its character.

Page 19: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

19

Asset Details Description

Address: 311 Hatton Road Significance: Group/Townscape, Social Reference Number: N34

Interesting Local building built in 1951.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Does not meet the Group/Townscape criteria as it is not a local landmark or prominent building.

Asset Details Description

Address: Orchard Café, 776 Staines Road Significance: Group/Townscape, Social

Reference Number: N35

A gateway building into Bedfont.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Does not meet the Group/Townscape criteria or the social criteria. It is not a landmark or a building which stands out positively in its surrounding. It is not associated with local communal, symbolic or spiritual significance or local cultural heritage.

Page 20: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

20

Reference Number Asset Details Description

Address: Hatton Farm House, Dick Turpin Way Significance: Group/Townscape Reference Number: N37

A unique reminder of the agricultural past of Hatton.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Only meets one criteria and is not of sufficient quality to merit inclusion on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: Lodge, David Henry Waring House Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N38

The Gate Keepers Lodge to David Henry Waring House. Although currently boarded up, it is an important addition to the David Henry Waring estate.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Within the curtilage of the listed building.

Page 21: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

21

Asset Details Description

Address: 29-31 Swan Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape

Reference Number: N39

Imposing pair of semi-detached bay fronted houses. Well detailed with barge boarding, intact boundary wall and brick details.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, it was thought that this pair had had too many alterations to be included.

Asset Details Description

Address: Legacy Centre Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N40

Art Deco style building, constructed in 1950. Retains the original flag pole feature on the façade.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No It was felt that the building had been changed in a way which impacted its significance and it was not appropriate to include it.

Page 22: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

22

Asset Details Description

Address: Feltham Fire and Ambulance Station Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N41

1960s fire station and accompany ambulance statement. An interesting example of this period of fire station buildings.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No It was felt that the building did not have architectural or historical significance sufficient to include it on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: Boundary Marker, Boston Manor Road near Junction with Boston Gardens Significance: Historical, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N42

Boundary Marker on the boundary walls to Boston Manor House and Park.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This marker forms part of a listed wall.

Page 23: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

23

Asset Details Description

Address: Lakeside, Boston Gardens Significance: Architectural, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N43

Large detached house in its own ground near the northern entrance to Boston Manor Park, likely dating from the interwar period. Likely named for its position next to Boston Manor’s lake.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This building does not meet the criteria, it does not have group/townscape significance and fails to meet the two required criteria.

Asset Details Description

Address: Brentford County Court, Alexandra Road Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N44

Good example of brutalist/modern civic architecture with strong linear forms and articulation. Added historic significance as the local court building. Local landmark which stands out positively in the area.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The building does not have sufficient architectural quality to be included on the local list, although it does have significance as a court, the magistrates court in Brentford is a better example and already locally listed.

Page 24: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

24

Asset Details Description

Address: Berkley House Significance: Architectural, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N45

Classic mid 20th century apartment typology, in terms of floorplate and site layout. Similar material palette to County Court a few doors down, together with Grade II Listed Alexandra house form composition of early-mid 20th Century buildings. Building features stone panel feature wall and a glass curtain wall feature to the stairwell.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The building does not have sufficient architectural quality to be included on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: Former railway arches and former dock railway viaduct Significance: Historical, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N46

Stump of the former dock railway viaduct with arches underneath by Isambard Kingdom Brunel (1859) with railway bridge removed which formerly ran to the docks. An interesting remnant of the industrial history of the area.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The significance of the viaduct has been impacted by the unsympathetic treatment of the railway arches.

Page 25: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

25

Asset Details Description

Address: Soaphouse Creek Marina Significance: Historical, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N47

A small marina occupying a former canal basin.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Marinas will not be considered for local listing.

Asset Details Description

Address: 2-12 Boston Manor Road Significance: Architectural, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N48

These characterful buildings stand out positively with good architectural detailing. Some of the group retain original features such as timber sashes, the original moulded timber doors with inset glazed panels, surmounted by a glazed fanlight, and front tiled pavements.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, this group of buildings does not warrant inclusion on the local list as they do not meet the group/townscape significance criteria as set out in the guidance.

Page 26: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

26

Asset Details Description

Address: Footbridge over Grand Union Canal near entrance to Boston Manor Park Significance: Architectural, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N49

Modern and attractive footbridge over Grand Union Canal of timber construction with a picturesque look. Makes a positive contribution to the character of the Grand Union Canal and conservation area.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The footbridge does not have sufficient architectural quality to be included on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: 71 Hamilton Road Significance: Architectural, Group/ Townscape Reference Number: N50

Large detached Victorian property. Maintains original features such as windows and doors. Stands out positively on the streetscape.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, this building is of a type which is common and does not warrant inclusion on the local list. The building is within a conservation area which affords it certain protections.

Page 27: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

27

Asset Details Description

Address: 30 Commerce Road Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N51

One of a group of art deco buildings along commerce road. This one retains its original windows on the top floor which adds to its character. Has historic value as a remnant of the borough’s industrial past.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The original crittal windows on the upper storey add to the character of the building, but the removal of these original features on the ground floor has compromised the integrity of the building’s character.

Asset Details Description

Address: School building at Clifden Road entrance, Brentford School for Girls Significance: Architectural, Social Reference Number: N52

A mid-20th century school building. Brick built and well detailed. Has architectural significance as a good example of mid-20th century architecture and has social significance as a local school.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This building does not meet the criteria for local listing.

Page 28: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

28

Asset Details Description

Address: 60 Green Dragon Lane Significance: Architectural, Historical, Social Reference Number: N53

Built in 1893 as a school. Now functions as a community centre. Has architectural significance as a prominent Victorian school building, built in brick. Has social and historical significance as place for education for the community.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Unsympathetic additions have harmed the character of this building and its architectural significance.

Asset Details Description

Address: Hope Cottages, 13-16 Orchard Road Significance: Architectural , Group/Townscape Reference Number: N54

Good examples of flat fronted Victorian housing, with semi-circular fanlights. The group maintains many original features such as windows and doors which add to their value as a cohesive group.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, this terrace does not have sufficient architectural quality to be included on the local list. They form part of an interesting and characterful group on the street and would be more appropriated designated as a conservation area, as is suggested in the draft St Paul’s Brentford Conservation Area Appraisal.

Page 29: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

29

Asset Details Description

Address: 34-36 Braemar Road Significance: Architectural, Group Reference Number: N55

Group of three terrace houses, which maintain their original features such as timber windows. This a is a handsome group of houses which adds to the character of the area positively.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This terrace is a of a standard Victorian design and does not warrant inclusion on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: The Pottery Arms, Clayponds Lane Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N56

Former pub, now converted to flats. Likely named for the pottery works which it was nearby.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The architectural significance of the building has been compromised by the conversion and the unsympathetic addition.

Page 30: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

30

Asset Details Description

Address: Park View, Church Walk Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N57

Large and imposing arts and crafts style house built c1900. Although the building has suffered some insensitive alterations, its architectural character is still evident in the building.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This building has suffered from unsympathetic additions which have harmed its significance and character. Does not warrant local listing.

Asset Details Description

Address: Drinking Fountain Redlees Park Significance: Architectural, Historical, Social Reference Number: N58

Art Deco drinking fountain probably installed in 1930s by the Metropolitan Drinking Fountain and Cattle Trough Association, when Redlees became a municipal park.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No It was felt that this fountain was not of sufficient quality to be included on the local list. There are better examples of water fountains in the borough and on the local list.

Page 31: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

31

Asset Details Description

Address: 282 Worton Road Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N59

One of the few remaining Art Deco industrial units in Worton Road – with additional buildings Art Deco buildings in the estate at rear. Until the 1920s the area comprised of orchards and market gardens. From1920s onwards factory units were built and in the 1930s these included a concrete pipe works, a steel construction works, an engineering works and a wireless factory. Many of the sites in Worton Road are now trading and industrial estates.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Not considered to be one of the best examples of art deco architecture in the borough. Better examples are proposed for the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: 276-278 Worton Road Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N60

Semi-detached pair of houses. Shown on 1894 map. Possibly built to house labourers working in the market gardens and orchards that covered the area.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Average Victorian semi-detached houses which have had a number of unsympathetic alterations such as the modern windows and the porch which diminish their character.

Page 32: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

32

Asset Details Description

Address: Oak Cottages, Worton Road Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N61

Terrace of Victorian cottages probably built for farm labourers working on Oak Farm, owned by W.T.Mann & Sons, market gardeners for over 100 years of Worton Road and Mogden Lane where a side turning is named after them.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Victorian housing of a common design which did not have sufficient significance to warrant inclusion on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: Former Farm House and Wall, 83 Worple Road Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N62

House remaining from 19th century when area was comprised of orchards and market gardens.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No A house dating from the 19th century is not on its own sufficient reason to be included on the local list. This house has clearly had a number of alterations which impact on its historic character.

Page 33: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

33

Asset Details Description

Address: Mary Anthony Building Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N63

Built in 1890 as St Mary’s R.C. High School, latterly became known as the Mary Anthony Building, part of the Gumley House school complex. In the 1990s the building and a portion of land were sold to developers and building converted into apartments. Included the original gates from the building, which were removed and rescued by a local resident and reinstated at the request of the council.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although a prominent building, it was not felt that this building warranted inclusion on the local list as although it has historical significance, it did not fit the criteria. The building does have some historical significance as a local school but two other local schools very near to this one are already on the local list. Additionally this building closed as a school and was converted to flats, somewhat diminishing its significance as a local school. The building is within the conservation area so protected via this designation.

Asset Details Description

Address: Saracen House, Swan Street Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N64

Part of a redevelopment in the area by Speyhawk in the 1980s.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This 1980s office block does not have sufficient architectural significance to be included on the local list. It is not the one of the best examples of this period of architecture, it does not demonstrate architectural quality in its design, material, construction or craftsmanship.

Page 34: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

34

Asset Details Description

Address: 3-4 The Pavement & 35-37 South Street Significance: Historic, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N65

No.35 South Street and 4 The Pavement retain original Victorian shop fronts. 3 The Pavement has installed replacement shop front to copy original. A reminder of the once thriving shopping area. Group value which contributes to the distinctive character of the local neighbourhood.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Victorian shopping parade which is not of distinctive or exception quality. These buildings are included within the conservation area so are recognized for their contribution to the character of the area this way.

Asset Details Description

Address: Isleworth Stairs, adjacent to Town Wharf Pub Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape, Social Reference Number: N66

In previous centuries used as a landing stage for people travelling by water. 17th century diarists Samuel Pepys and Evelyn record using them. Steps originally led to Town Wharf and Lower Square by the rear of the Old Blue School. In the 20th century they provided a frequent back-drop for films about smuggling.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No These types of steps are common in Hounslow along the Thames and this set is not unique. These steps are within conservation area and are protected via this designation.

Page 35: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

35

Asset Details Description

Address: Retaining Wall Surrounding All Saints’ Church, Church Street Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N67

19th Century retaining wall, plaque indicates it was built in 1826. Wall contains a number of decorative plaques to record high tides.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Considered to be within the curtilage of a listed building.

Asset Details Description

Address: Cathja Barge, Church Street Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape, Social Reference Number: N68

38 metre fully mobile Dutch barge moored at Isleworth Riverside since 1996. Sculpture “The Heron” by Martin Cotts is a permanent item.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The barge cannot be locally listed as it can be moved.

Page 36: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

36

Asset Details Description

Address: Queens Terrace Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N69

Terrace of cottages, all of a similar design, which have survived from the 19th century when Isleworth consisted mainly of market gardens and orchards. Probably built to house farm labourers. Includes the original surviving street sign.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The appropriate designation for such a large group of buildings is a conservation area, not local listing. This street is proposed for inclusion in the Isleworth Riverside Conservation Area.

Asset Details Description

Address: Tomb of Thomas Chandler Haliburton, All Saints Church Yard Significance: Historical, Social Reference Number: N70

Inscribed: “To the loved and honoured memory of Thomas Chandler Haliburton late one of Her Majesty’s Judges for the Province of Nova Scotia. He died at Isleworth August 17th 1865. Here also rest the remains of Sarah Harriet wife of Thomas Chandler Haliburton died November 27 1886 having survived her husband 21 years. The weary are at rest, Jesus Master Have Mercy Upon Us”. Originally from Nova Scotia, Judge Haliburton retired to Isleworth in 1856. He took an active interest in local affairs, holding public lectures and on one occasion a 2-day bazaar to help raise funds to extend what is now known as Isleworth Public Hall; he was Chairman of Isleworth Philanthropic Society.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No It was not felt that this grave had social significance as Thomas Chandler Haliburton is not a locally important person. His interest in local affairs and 2 day bazaar is not sufficient to qualify his grave as being socially and historically significant.

Page 37: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

37

Asset Details Description

Address: Podger Family Vault, All Saints Church Yard Significance: Historical, Social Reference Number: N71

William Podger was born 14th January 1817 in Somerset. After leaving school in 1832 he learnt the milling business then came to London where in 1842 he met Samuel Kidd, proprietor of Kidd’s Mill, Mill Plat, Isleworth, with whom he went into partnership four years later. He played a prominent and active part in local affairs; was a Sidesman and Church Warden at All Saints’ Church, Treasurer of numerous parochial funds, Trustee of Isleworth Charities, supporter of Isleworth Philanthropic Society and President of the London Master Bakers’ Pension and Almshouse Society. William Podger is not commemorated in any other way in Isleworth which gives the vault added significance as an historic reminder of the social contribution he made to the welfare of employees of the local flour mill, All Saints Church and as a philanthropist and charitable trustee.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No William Podger’s accomplishments do not qualify his grave as having social significance.

Asset Details Description

Address: Quaker Meeting House boundary wall Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N72

Boundary wall of the Quaker Meeting House, garden and burial ground. Quaker Meeting House Grade ll* listed, built in 1785, so it is assumed boundary wall erected at the same time.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The wall is within the curtilage of the listed meeting house.

Page 38: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

38

Asset Details Description

Address: Hanover Terrace London Road Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N73

Terrace of six cottages in a quiet location off the London Road.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No While handsome, this group of cottages is of a typical style and a common design.

Asset Details Description

Address: The Bridge Public House, 457 London Road Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N74

Built for William Farnell of the Isleworth Brewery, built at the time the railway was extended to Isleworth and adjacent to the iron bridge.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The building does not meet the criteria for historical significance, the building does not demonstrate important aspects of local social, economic cultural or military history. It is also not associated with a locally important person, family or group. It was built for a local brewery but this would not qualify the pub for local listing. The building also does not meet the criteria for Group/Townscape criteria, as it is not a local landmark or an example of urban planning or architectural unity, such as a shopping parade. It does have some significance in its name, in that it is named for the adjacent iron bridge, but this would not qualify the building for local listing, especially as this bride is still in situ and recalls the development of the railway through the area.

Page 39: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

39

Asset Details Description

Address: Grave of Father Eric Green, Isleworth Cemetery Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape, Social Reference Number: N75

Father Eric Green was a priest in Isleworth, who is buried in Isleworth Cemetery. He was responsible for a number of works in Isleworth, including the building of our Lady of Sorrows and St Bridget Roman Catholic Church and St Marys Catholic School. He also founded an outdoor procession to honour people from Isleworth.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The grave stone does not meet the criteria for architectural significance as it does have demonstrate architectural quality and it is not attributed to a notable designed. It is of a standard crucifix design and is not the best example of a gravestone in the Isleworth cemetery. Better examples such as the Ayres monument has been proposed for local listing. It does not meet the criteria for Group/Townscape significance as it is not a local landmark, an example of local architectural unity or urban planning, it does not demonstrate the past development of the area, and it is to an important green space. The grave does not meet the criteria for social significance as it is not associated with local communal, symbolic or spiritual significance, it is not associated with cultural heritage such as art, literature, music or film and it is not used for important community events. It only meets the criteria for historical significance and therefore does not qualify for local listing.

Asset Details Description

Address: Commemorative Plaques of Brentford Union Workhouse, Brentford District Schools k/as Percy House and Hounslow Hospital, West Middlesex Hospital Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape, Social Reference Number: N76

This group of plaques in their current setting are regarded as of townscape and social significance, remnants charting the past, namely evolution of BUW and Hounslow Hospital into the modern day 2003 re-build of West Middlesex University Hospital in which grounds they stand. As such they and the area within which they are located are an important element of the local neighbourhood and add positively to their apt surroundings due to their historical associations.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although these plaques are an interesting element of history of the area they do not meet the criteria for local listing. They do not meet the criteria for group/townscape significance or social significance. They are not local landmark or an example of local architectural unity. They are not a remnant of the development of the area, but rather a marker of the history of the area. They do not have social significance as set out in the criteria as they are not associated with local communal, symbolic or spiritual significance and are not associated with local cultural heritage such as art literature or music.

Page 40: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

40

Asset Details Description

Address: Bridge over Duke of Northumberland's River, within Mogden Sewage Works Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N77

Ornate bridge over Duke of Northumberland’s River – forms part of pedestrian access through Mogden Sewage Works.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This bridge does not meet the criteria for group/townscape significance. The bridge is not a local landmark nor an example of architectural unity such as a shopping parade or terrace, a remnant of the past development of the area, or an important green or public space.

Asset Details Description

Address: Boundary Marker in Osterley Park Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N78

Historic boundary marker in Osterley Park, in front of the house.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This boundary marker is not of the same quality as the others proposed for the local list.

Page 41: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

41

Asset Details Description

Address: 14-20 College Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N79

Group of semi-detached houses with interesting detailing on the façade. The group of houses also have interesting and characterful porches.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This style of building is found throughout the conservation area, which is the appropriate designation for large groups of buildings.

Address: 22 College Road and 1 Ridgeway Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N80

Interesting end of terrace houses which terminate a junction. Interesting for their townscape value and the way they respond to their setting in the roads.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although an interesting element of townscape as these houses are ay a junction of two roads, they are of a common design in the conservation area.

Page 42: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

42

Asset Details Description

Address: 16-18 The Grove Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N81

Pair of semi-detached houses on a grand scale. These houses and the houses on the outer part of The Grove formed part of the original Davies Estate. Henry Davies was a speculator in real-estate and planned the Spring Grove Estate with large villas aimed at gentlemen, professionals and retired officers. Although this pair suffers from an unfortunate addition they still maintain their character and their importance as part of the original estate.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, it is one of the houses built as part of the Davies estate and typical of the style. Better examples of this period of development are proposed for the local list. The building is still a positive feature of the conservation area.

Asset Details Description

Address: 12 The Grove Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N82

Large detached villa, forming part of the original Davies estate. Retains original features, such as windows.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, it is one of the houses built as part of the Davies estate and typical of the style. Better examples of this period of development are proposed for the local list. The building is a positive feature of the conservation area.

Page 43: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

43

Asset Details Description

Address: 10 The Grove Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N83

Large detached villa, forming part of the original Davies estate. Retains original features, such as windows. Same style at the house at Number 12.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, it is one of the houses built as part of the Davies estate and typical of the style. Better examples of this period of development are proposed for the local list. The building is a positive feature of the conservation area.

Asset Details Description

Address: 8 The Grove Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N84

Large detached villa, forming part of the original Davies estate and exemplary of this style of housing.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, it is one of the houses built as part of the Davies estate and typical of the style. Better examples of this period of development are proposed for the local list. The building is a positive feature of the conservation area.

Page 44: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

44

Asset Details Description

Address: 4-6 The Grove Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N85

Pair of semi-detached houses designed on a smaller scale than other on the Grove and in the estate although still of handsome design.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, this pair of houses was built as part of the Davies estate and typical of the style. Better examples of this period of development are proposed for the local list. These buildings are a positive feature of the conservation area

Asset Details Description

Address: 2-3 Church Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N86

Handsome and well detailed pair of semi-detached houses. Pebble dashed with interestingly detailed porches.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No These buildings do not meet the criteria for group/townscape significance as set out in the guidance.

Page 45: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

45

Asset Details Description

Address: 104 Thornbury Road Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N87

Victorian house on a smaller scale than most of the villas in the historic estate but likely developed in the same period. Shown on the 1894 ordinance survey map.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This building does not meet the criteria for historical significance. While it is a a positive and interesting feature of the conservation area is not the best example of this period and style of architecture in the conservation area.

Asset Details Description

Address: 77-87 Thornbury Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N88

1960s group of terrace houses. Interestingly detailed with stone frontages and porthole windows.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This group of houses is not the best example of this period of architecture. They are within a conservation area and afforded certain protections via this designation.

Page 46: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

46

Asset Details Description

Address: 54-56 The Grove Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N89

Pair of semi-detached houses in the same grand style at the others which make up the Davies Estate.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, a large extension to one half of the semi-detached pair has unbalanced the pair. There are better examples of Davies estate buildings on the local list and proposed for the local list. The pair make a postive contribution the conservation area.

Asset Details Description

Address: 66 St Stephens Road Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape

Reference Number: N90

Built in 1882 as one of a group of three by Thomas Hiscock. In the late 1880’s the house was occupied by William Tufnell LeQueux, who worked for some years as a reporter on the Middlesex Chronicle, and later became a prolific and popular author.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This building did not meet the criteria for architectural or group/townscape significance. There are better examples of Victorian buildings within the conservation area, this building lacks the same level of architectural detailing of the other buildings on St Stephens Road proposed for the local list. It is not a local landmark, qualifying it for group/townscape significance.

Page 47: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

47

Asset Details Description

Address: 61-63 St Stephens Road Significance: Architectural, Historical, Social Reference Number: N91

Semi-detached pair built in 1881 by Charles Danels, each with an attractive side bay window looking out over the side garden. The dwellings were probably built for Gilbert Plumbridge, who lived in No63 and rented out the adjoining semi, and was leader of the St Stephens Residents group who in the late 1880’s liaised with the Local Board over the making up of the road.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This pair of semi-detached houses lacks the architectural detailing of the other houses on St Stephen’s road proposed for the local list. The pair also do not meet the criteria for social significance, as they are not associated with local spiritual, communal or symbolic significance.

Asset Details Description

Address: Hounslow Police Station Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N92

A good example of mid 20th century civic architecture.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Not the best example of 20th century architecture in Hounslow or proposed for the local list.

Page 48: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

48

Asset Details Description

Address: Alma and Lucknow Cottages Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N93

Holly Road was Hounslow’s first estate road, divided into plots, take up in groups by local builders. Alma Cottages were the first built, in 1854, Lucknow following 3 years later.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Victorian cottages of average design found throughout the borough. While they have historic interest they do not warrant inclusion on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: Heatherdale, 57-59 St Stephens Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N94

This a later, and a fine contrasting example of Charles Danels work. In 1884 Danels had built 124/126 -Margison Villas for occupation and renting out by the Martins, who were clearly satisfied by his work. Danels built to commission, usually semis, one for occupation, and one for rent. The design includes Danels’ trademark dental courses. It has group value with the other works by Danels on St Stephens Road.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, this pair does not meet the group/townscape criteria as they are not a local landmark and being a pair of semi-detached houses does not give them group value. They are in a conservation area and they make a positive contribution to the character of this conservation area.

Page 49: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

49

Asset Details Description

Address: 329 Martindale Road Significance: Architectural, Historical

Reference Number: N95

Interesting mid to late 20th century house with stained glass and an octagonal shaped roof dormer. Good example of architecture from this period, of which there are not many within the borough.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although an interesting building, it is not the best example of this period of architect and therefore does not meet the criteria.

Asset Details Description

Address: Inwood Park Lodge, Inwood Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N96

The lodge for Inwood Park. Built in the late 19th early 20th century, in appears on the 1910 OS map. Striking design with two front gables and bay windows. Has significance as the lodge for Inwood Park.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Does not meet the criteria for group/townscape significance as it is not a local landmark and not part of a wider group which adds to its significance.

Page 50: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

50

Asset Details Description

Address: Emmanuel Baptist Church and adjacent hall, Staines Road Significance: Architectural, Social Reference Number: N97

Arts and Crafts style Baptist church, constructed in 1933. Original stained glass windows at the frontage of the building. The hall is in a polychromatic style with gothic pointed arch windows, and pre-dates the larger church. This building was likely originally used as the church and then converted to a hall when the larger church was built.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No There are other religious buildings proposed for the local list which are better examples of that type of building. This building, which having some interesting features, was not felt to meet the architectural significance criteria.

Asset Details Description

Address: 121-123 Hibernia Road Significance: Architectural, Historical Reference Number: N98

Attractive and well detailed pair of houses, with barge boards and polychromatic brick work. Roundels on the top of the building depict a floral design. Road sign depicting the name of the street and a sign above the doorway names this pair of houses ‘Hibernia’. Maps indicate that this pair was likely some of the first housing built on the street. The name likely relates to the previous name of the street “Irish Lane”, Hibernia is the Latin name for Ireland.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No While handsome, it was not thought that this pair of houses should be placed on the local list as they fail to meet the historical significance criteria.

Page 51: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

51

Asset Details Description

Address: Cressy’s Corner Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape

Reference Number: N99

Corner shopping parade composed of red brick with pediments on the corner and on each side. Built in the first half of the 20th century.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The architectural significance of this building was impacted by the unsympathetic shop fronts.

Asset Details Description

Address: 333-339 Hanworth Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N100

Substantial group of two semi-detached houses. Exceptionally well detailed with column details to the bay windows, iron detailing on the top of the bay windows and bargeboards features on the top floor.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No Although handsome, these pairs have had a number of alterations which have impacted their significance.

Page 52: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

52

Asset Details Description

Address: 131 Heston Road Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N101

19th century three storey Victorian building. Possibly the coaching annex for the former Old George Public House adjacent, the wide entrance at ground floor supports that idea.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The building, while being a positive contributor to the character of the conservation area, does not meet the criteria for architectural significance. It is of a relatively standard Victorian design. However, it is within the conservation area and forms a part of a characterful group.

Asset Details Description

Address: 135-137 Heston Road Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N102

Pair of Victorian cottages next the listed building adjacent. Remnant of the village character of the area.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This pair of buildings, while being positive contributors to the character of the conservation area, do not meet the criteria for architectural significance. They are of a relatively standard Victorian design. However, they are within the conservation area and form a part of a characterful group.

Page 53: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

53

Asset Details Description

Address: Norwood Green Junior School Significance: Architectural, Historical, Social Reference Number: N103

Mid-20th century school building with a distinctive roof scape. Has architectural quality as a good example of a 20th century municipal building, with interesting features. Has historical significance as an example of this period of architecture. Has social significance as a local school.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The building is not the best example of this period of architecture, and other better examples of school architecture are proposed for the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: Sheepcote Close Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N104

Good example of 1960s terrace housing. Uniform in design with projecting porches, this group maintains its group character and architectural character.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The appropriate designation for a large group of houses such as this is a conservation area which these are already a part of.

Page 54: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

54

Asset Details Description

Address: Manhole Covers, various locations Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N105

Products of the Winterborne Foundry and Engineering Works, 79 South Street. William Winterborne set up in business 1866 and is credited with inventing the free wheel mechanism for bicycles about 1870 selling the patent to Raleigh Cycle Company for £80; he received a gold inventor’s medal from Queen Victoria. He and his six sons cast many manhole covers and drain gratings for Heston, Isleworth, Twickenham and Richmond Councils, possibly being unique in making their own wooden patterns (some are held at Gunnersbury Museum).

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The proposed manhole covers and grates do not meet the criteria for local listing. The manhole covers on the accompanying list received are ubiquitous and each of a similar design, and although they have some significance as coming from a local foundry this was not thought to make them qualify for local listing. The grates are of a utilitarian design and function do not have architectural, or group/townscape significance, being stamped with “Isleworth” do not give them enough significance to merit local listing.

Reference Number Asset Details Description

Address: Syon House, 1

Harvard Road

Significance: Architectural,

Historical, Group/Townscape

Reference Number: N106

Syon House is an elegant, well-proportioned,

double-fronted, three-storey, Victorian villa

dating from around 1882. It is brick-built and

part white-painted stuccoed. The building

retains timber sliding sash windows and

timber front door. This imposing villa is a

landmark in its area, occupying as it does a

prominent corner position at a wide road-

junction. A good example of Victorian villa

development, one of the largest and grandest

houses built on the Askew Estate, with added

significance as the home of the estate

developer, William John Tomlinson.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No

This building, while handsome, is of a common Victorian style. It does not have sufficient architectural

significance to satisfy the criteria and it also did not meet the criteria for group/townscape significance.

Page 55: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

55

Asset Details Description

Address: 268-270 Worton Road Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N108

Brick built semi-detached pair. Shown on 1894 map. Possibly built to house labourers working in the market gardens and orchards that covered the area.

Reference Number Asset Details tails Description ription

Address: Fromow’s Corner, Sutton Lane North Significance: Architectural, Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N107

A good example of an imposing late Victorian mansion block with ground-floor retail units, with connections to a prominent local family, their business and the previous land use of much of West Chiswick for centuries. Three storeys plus a set-back mansard forming attic floor. Red brick with slate mansard. Timber windows to upper floors. Street elevation consists of five non-identical frontages demarcated by brick pilasters and capitals, with a principal central bay of three windows wide containing two retail units at ground floor level. Parapet topped with a Dutch gable and stone plaque on corner of Sutton Lane North and Wellesley Road. The building was built on a plot which was previously a seed shop for the Fromow family nurseries. The Fromows were a prominent family in Chiswick.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No While the building does have group/townscape significance as a prominent landmark, it does not satisfy the criteria for architectural or group/townscape significance.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No

These cottages are of a common Victorian design and do not warrant inclusion on the local list.

Page 56: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

56

Asset Details Description

Address: Roundel, Hall St Bridget's Church Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N109

Renaissance style roundel. Depicts a religious scene.

Asset Details Description

Address: Bath Villas, 124-128 Twickenham Road Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N110

Group of three terraced houses. Plaque states ‘Bath Villas 1869’. Named for William Pulteney, who was married to John Gumley’s (of nearby Gumley House) only daughter and who was made the first Earl of Bath in 1742.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This group of cottages is of an average Victorian design and does not warrant inclusion on the local list. The loose association with Gumley family does not satisfy the historical criteria as set out in the guidance.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No

This plaque, while nice, does not warrant inclusion on the local list as it does not satisfy the criteria from

group/townscape significance.

Page 57: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

57

Asset Details Description

Address: Stone Plaque on Worple Road side of Jubilee Garage South Street Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape Reference Number: N111

Plaque erected in 1887 building named to commemorate Queen Victoria’s Golden Jubilee, but possibly of earlier date.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No The plaque does not have group/townscape significance and therefore does not meet the requirements for inclusion on the local list.

Asset Details Description

Address: Cobbles, Linkfield Road outside Raybell Court Significance: Historical, Group/Townscape

Cobble stones, possibly remaining from original road surface.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No This set of cobbles is thought to be a more modern example and other, better, examples have been suggested for inclusion on the local list.

Page 58: Nominations not proposed for the local list€¦ · Nominations not proposed for the local list These nominations were received as part of the process of updating the local list.

58

Asset Details Description

Address: Lovat Walk, Cranford Lane Significance: Architectural, Group/Townscape, Social

A group of almshouses built in 1977 by Edwards Jones. Described by Pevsner as a “bright spot” in Cranford. Unfortunately most have lost their distinctive coloured doors with port hole windows, which added to their character.

Recommended for inclusion? Yes / No While an interesting modern group of alms-houses, the loss of certain features, such as the original doors, detracts from their character.