No. 12/8/2016-HE&MTGovernment of India

Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public EnterprisesDepartment of Heavy Industry

Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi - 11001l.Dated the ih September, 2016.

Office Memorandum

Subject: Minutes of the A th Meeting of Screening Committee held on 30th August, 2016under the Chairmanship of Shri Vishvajit Sahay, Joint Secretary, Departmentof heavy Industry, to consider the proposals received under differentcomponents of the Scheme on Enhancement of Competitiveness in IndianCapital Goods Sector.

The undersigned is directed to forward herewith a copy of the Minutes of the 4th

Meeting of Screening Committee held on 30.08.2016 in the Department of Heavy Industryunder the Chairmanship of Shri Vishvajit Sahay, Joint Secretary, Department of HeavyIndustry, for Information.

Enclosed: As above.

(U.K. Mukherjee)Under Secretary (HE&MT)

E-mail: uk.mukherjee@nic.in

To

(As per list attached)

F No. 12/8/20i6-HE & MT

Department of Heavy Industry(HE&MT Section)

Subject: 4th Meeting of the Screening Committee to consider proposals received underthe Scheme on Enhancement of Competitiveness in the Indian Capital GoodsSector- regarding.

The 4thMeeting of the Screening Committee to consider proposals received under theScheme on Enhancement of Competitiveness in the Indian Capital Goods Sector (CGScheme) was held on 30.8.2016 under the chairmanship of Shri Vishvajit Sahay, JointSecretary (HE&MT), Department of Heavy Industry. List of participants is annexed.

2. In the Meeting, one proposal each under Centre of Excellence for TechnologyDevelopment (CoE) component and Common Engineering Facility Centre (CEFC)component of the CG Scheme were considered. Apart from the above, 4 proposals underTechnology Acquisition Fund Programme (TAFP) component of the CG Scheme, receivedthrough Mis. GIT A were also considered. The applicants made presentation before theCommittee which deliberated on the different aspect of the proposals. The decision arrived atin the Meeting in respect of the proposals are indicated in the succeeding paragraphs.

3. Proposal of Center of Excellence by Coimbatore pump cluster for developmentand manufacture of state of art six inch submersible pump.

3.1 A presentation was made by the representatives of Coimbatore pump cluster forsetting up Centre of Excellence. Under the proposal, Scientific and Industrial Testing andResearch Centre (Si'Tarc), Indian Institute of Science (USc) Bangalore, Indian Institute ofTechnology (IIT)-Madras, Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute (CMERI) ,PSG College of Technology (PSG CT) and Southern Indian Engineering Manufacturers'Association (SIEMA) have joined hands to develop smart six inch submersible pump of 4000RPM at a project cost of Rs.8.41 crores in 12 months. Distributed centers of excellencewould be created with Sitarc coordinating the project. Screening Committee requested toexplore the possibility of USCmT-Madras coordinating the project. DHI contribution ofRs.6.73 crores has been requested. Rest of the fund will be provided by Si'Tarc. 11Coimbatore based units have joined hands for commercialization of technology.

3.2 The project has been conceived at the initiative of Department of Commerce. Thisproject is a part of their strategy of developing 99 product lines with state of art technologies,so that the product export could be accelerated and high imports at present are reversed.

3.3 The technology development has three components namely brushless direct currentmotor, design and manufacture of 4000 RPM pump and controls to make the pump smart.The product specifications have been finalized with the industry and the institutes responsiblefor technology development. The technology development partners, each of which is areputed institute, has been assigned specific responsibility, time table, resources and expectedoutput. .

3.4 It was presented that 6 inch submersibles are most popular models in India as well asabroad. However, at present the 6 inch submersible pump for process plants and agriculturalapplications are made using less efficient motor types. This development will ensure latestglobally competitive product. Presently, major market is domestic and export in this category

Page 1 of 11

F No. i2/8/20i6-HE & MT

is approximately 1% - 2% of global market. With this development, it is expected that saleswill increase domestically as well as there will be a boost in exports. The expected pricing ofthe product is under US $ 1000; therefore it will have commercial viability, since itsinternational equivalent now are selling at prices which are more by 30 % to 60% .

3.5 The project involves hard component ofRs.5 crores, 50% of which is imported due torequirements of high precision, reliability and repeatability. It was emphasized that the list offacilities created is found to be essential and the facilities created will also serve next series ofproduct technology development.

3.6 The Committee examined technical, financial viability and commercial viability. Inview of the technical capabilities of the proposed partner institutes, the Committee found thatthe target specifications can be met / developed. Even with the projections for revenue onconservative side, in sixth year, revenue of Rs 100 lakhs is being projected. From second yearonwards, the project may be able to meet is working expenses. It was presented that due tothe new product being developed under the proposal, the additional tumover of Rs 384 crorein five years each towards domestic ( 20,000 pumps p.a. by 11 partners by 2020 ) and exports( 20,000 pumps p.a. by 11 partners by 2020) will be generated. They have estimated that theCentral exchequer may gain Rs 50 crore in five years as additional central taxes as a result ofthe proposed development.

3.7 The Committee observed the proposal has all the necessary information for decisionmaking and complete in all respect. The screening Committee established that the project fitsinto the Scheme guidelines on account of product having application in the CG sectorincluding in hot rolling mill of steel plants etc, industry contribution being minimum of 20%,project output being improved global competitiveness of beneficiary CG units and projectdesign falling within scheme parameters.

3.8 Committee informed that as per the approved IPR Policy for COE, technology has tobe, opened to all after two year lock in period, so that the benefit goes to the 200 other pumpmanufacturing units at mutually agreed terms and conditions. Committee instructed that aproper and efficient monitoring system, Quarter wise PERT for monitoring, PR&MC, futureproject list for sustainability, affiliation with CGSC / Govt bodies, coordination with DoCfor exports be maintained.

3.9 The screening committee decided to recommend the proposal to the ApexCommittee for a grant ofRs 6.73 crore.

4. CEFC proposal from Science Engineering and Technological Upliftment (SETU)near Surat.

4.1 The proposal - by Science Engineering and Technological Upliftment Foundation(SETU) to set up a CEFC for Textile Machinery at Bardoli near Surat was considered.SETU is a not for profit Section 8 company promoted by Mis Textile MachineryManufacturers' Associations, India (TMMA), Surat Engineering Vikas Association (SEVA)and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Education Society (SVPES). The CEPC aims to serveIndustrial Estates in various region of South Gujarat -Surat, Bardoli, Navsari, Val sad, Vapi.,Ankleshvar, Dahej, Bharuch, Vadodara and Vyara (no CEFC in this region) and aims toaddress the technological gap due to lack of awareness on technical textiles, technologyobsolesce, , poor infrastructure, lack of skilled workforce. The proposal seeks to enhance

Page 2 of 11

FNo. 12/8/2016-HE & MT

employability, standardization of components and processes, harmonize different segmentsand components and improve global competitiveness. The proposed facility plans to provideproduct I component development support and offer technical services for designing,developing, testing and manufacturing of textile machinery and components.

4.2 SETU informed that they had undertaken a need survey of more than 500 textileengineering firms and vendors( 100 more firms since the Internal Scrutiny Group Meeting) inthe catchment area. The major demand from industry, as emerged from the survey, is that ofproduct I component development and training. Industry representatives explained that thelocal industry is behind 15 -20 years in technology. The CEFC is needed to catch up withglobal technology levels through design, development, testing, certification and training toupgrade their operations and processes and also inculcate use oflatest manufacturing technologies I machines. Total Project cost is Rs.50.27 crore. DHIgrant support envisaged of Rs.27.S1 crore is SO% of the machinery cost. Promoterscontribution will be Rs.18.37 crore and the rest will be arranged by Term Loan amounting toRs.4.09 crore. Land is already with SETU through their partner ( Engineering College atBardoli). The funding pattern falls within DHI CG Scheme guidelines.

4.3 SETU has expressed readiness in getting associated with CGSC. As advised by ISG,·they have confmned that they have seen the working model of Si'Tarc Coimbatore and otherCEFCs and tried to capture the best practices there. They have also decided to inviteGovernment of Gujarat for being a stakeholder/governing council member. They have basedthe rates I user charges for their services according to the rates prevalent in the market. Theyhave assessed that they would become self sustaining from second year onwards.

4.4 Broad list of machinery I equipment worth Rs 34.76 crores for which the grant is beingsought was provided, wherein around Rs, 16.62 crores worth of equipment will be importedand Rs 18.14 crore worth of equipment will be indigenous. Members explained that importedmachineries being procured are new and have to be imported because imported machines arerequired to be used in the CEFC being of ultra precision accuracy, repeatability and workinglife are not available domestically. It was clarified that pre-operative expenses includesinstallation/transportation and other such charges related to equipment.

4.5 Members observed that the proposal is complete in all respects, falls withinhDID CG scheme guidelines and has the potential to increase the global competitivenessof the Textile Machinery Units. The committee felt that the pro psoaI provides a strongskill upgradation opportunity. The committee, therefore supports the proposal to setup the CEFC for Textile Machinery at Bardoli.

4.6 The screening committee decided to recommend the proposal to the ApexCommittee for a grant ofRs 27.81 crore.

5. Following 4 proposals from GITA, as per their recommendations, considered fit forthe Screening Committee, were deliberated by ISG and placed before Screening Committee.The presentations were made by the individual applicants and different aspects of proposalswere discussed. GITA informed that they had conducted the on-site due diligence of thesefour companies along with project assessment by experts and thereafter, these projects havebeen strongly recommended by GITA. These experts were also invited for the screeningcommittee meeting.

Page 3 of 11

FNo. 12/8/2016-HE & MT

5.1 The proposal from PTC Industries on Titanium, Zirconium Exotic AlloyCastings through Vacuum Melt and Powder Metallurgy HlP. The company proposesacquisition of technology through outright purchase from Castings Technology International(CTl), a company based in United Kingdom with acquisition cost (inclusive ofplant/machinery/knowhow) of Rs.51.0 1 crore. Proposal involves export licensing from USgovernment. Committee acknowledged that the technology proposed by PTC which includessetting up of manufacturing facility for Titanium Castings through introduction of newtechnologies like, Additive Manufacturing through 3D Printing, Erosion resistant CeramicShelling, Melting & Pouring in Vacuum Arc Re-melter (VAR), Hot Isostatic Pressurisation(HIP) is highly niche technology and will be prestigious for Govt. to fund. GITA has got theonsite due diligence conducted by Dr. A Bhartacharjee, Scientist DMRL, technical expertand, Shri Ranjit Datta, former DGM SBI, the financial expert who have stronglyrecommended the project.

5.1.1 Financial Summary submitted by the Applicant as per Application Submission:(Amount in lNR Lakhs)

Technology Acquisition cost Sources of FundingParticulars Amount Particulars AmountCost of Technology & associated 46,26,00,00 Contribution by 11,02,00,000modification 0 AcquirerAccessories/Software/Specialize 2,20,00,000 Others, if any 30,00,00,000d Training related to ProposedTechnologyLogistic & Installation Cost 1,98,00,000 Fund requested from 10,00,00,000

DH1IGITAExcise/Import Duty, Taxes, etc. 58,00,000Total Cost of Technology 51,02,00,00 Total Sources of 51,02,00,000

° Funding

5.1.2 Dr. A Bhattacharjee, expert from DMRL mentioned that in Indian context, at present,except for DMRL and HAL no private company possesses Hot Isostatic Pressurisation (HIP)technology and Vacuum Arc Re-melter (VAR) which is claimed to be among the top 5biggest H1P in the world and the project has been strongly recommended for support, as thisis a niche and sensitive technology for India to be adopted. Dr. S Biswas, Director(Technology), BHEL mentioned that the Titanium casting will have much relevance forvarious critical components of Gas and Steam Turbines and would substantially reduce theimport dependence of BHEL on Siemens and Alstom, and therefore should be supported.Applicant informed that the agreement has already been signed with their foreign collaboratorand they have signed a Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with the Technology Providers.Project has already been started and they already made some payment (around Rs 19 crores)for the same. PTC Industries have been advised to share the list of services along withactivities & timelines which is being proposed by Technology provider as per the agreementsigned with the applicant.

5.1.3 It was clarified by PTC Industries that, CTI (technology provider) will collaboratewith PIC for a period of 3 years as per the agreement which will include the complete know-how of processes including material knowledge like Titanium.

Page 4 of 11

FNo. 12!8!2016-HE & MT

5.1A On the IPR issue, the applicant proposed to allow extending the lPR clause upto 5years and post that, PTC should be open to share the know-how regarding the above processto any central government R&D institute of related field at a mutually agreeable nominaltechnology transfer cost subject to the technology not being transferred further; since this is ahigh gestation and niche technology. However, for technology transfer to others, theapplicant valuated the technology know-how cost @ INR 70 crores as the technology is aboutacquisition of technology along with the required level of infrastructure for technologyacquisition and its adaptation. It was stated that Rs 70 cr escalated / adjusted for inflationafter 5 years would form the fee for transfer of knowhow. The experts present felt that it isunlikely that any manufacturer with these capabilities would emerge in the near future andthat the stipulation put forth by Mis PTC may not lead to undue benefit or impedecompetition in this highly niche area.

5.1.5 A view on the IPR issue needs to be taken as the guidelines stipulate IPR for 2 yearsafter which it can be opened up to the others at a nominal cost. Applicant was requested toshare a brief justification note in line with their request for providing a gestation period of 5years with a minimum technology transfer cost of 70 crore plus inflated amount, if the sameis to be opened up, as per DHI guidelines. Even if the Apex Committee approves, the matterwould need to be referred to the Review Committee for a suitable decision.

5.1.6 Subject to the above, the committee recommended the proposal to the ApexCommittee.

5.2 The Proposal from Allied Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Delhi for Manufacturing ofHeavy Duty High Reliability Electrical Specialized Power Cables. The proposal is forTechnology Acquisition and Development to manufacture heavy duty electrical cables ofinternational standards, for power substations and specialized applications by acquiringcomplete cable design software, wire drawing with online annealing and specialised extrusiontechnologies. It was explained by applicant and vetted by the committee members thatSpecialized Power Cables are highly reliable and premium priced product for various sectoralapplications and at present majorly imported from Europe and China. It was stated that withthe upcoming growth Indian power sector, oil and refinery sector, railways etc. SpecializedPower Cables will have a huge market potential. The technology proposed in this project isgoing to create a niche facility to manufacture state of art specialized cables which willbe very much comparable with the imported quality and very economically priced. TheOnline Annealing, Automatic Insulation and Integrated Software designing technology asproposed in the project proposes to ensure very high quality and precision Specialized Cablemanufacturing in the country which is not much availabJe currently. GITA has got the onsitedue diligence conducted by Prof. R Balasubramanian, Former NTPC Chair Professor,Indian Institute of Technology (lIT), Delhi, technical expert and,Shri Ranjit Datta, thefinancial expert who have recommended the project.

5.2.1 Financial Summary submitted by the Applicant as per Application Submission:(Amount in INR Lakhs)

Technology Acquisition cost Sources of FundingParticulars Amount Particulars AmountCost of Technology & associated 12,58,00,000 Contribution by Acquirer 3,75,00,000modificationAccessories/Software/Specialized - Others, if any 3,74,00,000

Page 5 of 11

FNo. 12/8/2016-HE & MT

Training related to ProposedTechnologyLogistic & Installation Cost 45,00,000 Fund requested from 7,49,00,000

DHIIGITAExcise/Import Duty, Taxes, etc. 1,95,00,000Total Cost of Technology 14,98,00,000 Total Sources of 14,98,00,000

Funding

5.2.3 The project is strongly recommended for support by Prof. R Balasubramanium, liTDelhi. Dr S Biswas, BHEL stated that the project has large relevance for Indian Power andother energy consuming sector as we are a net importer of Specialized Power Cables, andtherefore, should be considered for support.

5.2.4 With respect to DHI's observation in ISG that Specialized Power Cables is a sectorfalling under DIPP's domain area, CEO, GITA has stated that they have strong support fromDIPP and therefore they have has requested DIPP to issue a request letter. DIPPrepresentative Mr PLN Murthy, in the screening Committee meeting recommended that thisis a good project with strong technical delivery and production capacity creation in thecountry, and since DIPP do not have any such particular scheme to support these kind ofprojects, therefore it should be considered by DHI for support under the TAFP scheme. CEOGITA stated that a letter of recommendation from DlPP for supporting this project will beforwarded by DIPP at earliest.

5.2.5 It was clarified that eligible funding under TAFP scheme will be limited to 25% onlyas per the guidelines. The Screening Committee also suggested the applicant to share thetechnology cost break-up in which technology know-how and other services are detailed out.On sharing of IPR, Allied has given consent of sharing the lPR as per the requirements of thescheme guidelines, which they have requested to be extended upto 4 years instead of 2 years

5.3 The proposal from Motif Capacitors Pvt. Ltd. for Segmented Film IndustrialCapacitor to acquire technology from Germany. Project pertains to designing of FAIL-SAFEHigh reliable Capacitor with a life expectancy of 30000 hours from MOTIF Capacitors Pvt.Ltd., Delhi relates to Electrical Systems and Equipment Component! Sub Assembly. Projectinvolves Technology Acquisition and Development to manufacture FAIL-SAFE capacitorwith customized Segmented Film which will improvise the phenomenon of the self healingwith a life expectancy of 30000 hours, by acquiring technologies like Special Vacuummetaliser for metalizing high crystalline BOPP, High Precision Slitter with Line follower,Capacitor winding machine with automatic torque control, Testing lab as per IECcompliance. The experts, Prof. R. Balasubramanian (technical) and Shri. Ranjit Datta(financial) who joined the due-diligence have strongly recommended to support the project.

5.3.1 Financial Summary submitted by the Applicant as per Application Submission:

Technology Acquisition cost Sources of FundingParticulars Amount Particulars AmountCost of Technology & associated 16,97,44,820 Contribution by Acquirer 4,33,54,693modificationAccessories/Software/Specialized 1,42,00,000 Others, if any 7,34,18,774Training related to Proposed

(Amount in INR Lakhs)

Page 6 of 11

FNo. 12/8/2016-HE & MT

TechnologyLogistic & Installation Cost 33,94,896 Fund requested from 10,00,00,000

DHI/GITAExcise/Import Duty, Taxes, etc. 2,94,33,751Total Cost of Technology 21,67,73,467 Total Sources of Fundi0-.K 21,67,73,467

5.3.2 It was informed that at present, India imports 8 million USD worth of industrialcapacitors per month for various applications in electrical and electronics manufacturingsectors, considering free import duty and raw material duty. Segmented film capacitormanufacturing technology is highly technical and presently being imported from Japan,Korea and China. Prof. R Balasubramanium, III Delhi mentioned that to improve thereliability of the operations of Power sector equipment, segmented film capacitor will playasignificant role. Therefore, the project is strongly recommended for support.

5.3.3 With respect to DHl's observation in ISO that Capacitor is a subject falling underDIPP's domain, CEO, OITA has stated that they have strong support from DIPP andtherefore they have requested DIPP to issue a request letter. DIPP representative Mr PLNMurthy, in the screening Committee meeting recommended that this is a good project withstrong technical delivery and production capacity creation in the country, and since DIPP donot have any such particular scheme to support these kind of projects, therefore it should beconsidered by DHl for support under the TAFP scheme. CEO OITA stated that a letter ofrecommendation from DIPP for supporting this project will be forwarded by DIPP at earliest.

5.3.4 It was clarified that eligible funding under TAFP scheme will be limited to 25% onlyas per the guidelines. The committee also suggested MOTIF to share the technology costbreak-up in which technology know-how and equipment / machinery costs. On sharing ofIPR, MOTIF has given consent of sharing the IPR as per the requirements of the schemeguidelines, which may be extended upto 3.5 years instead of 2 years. If approved, waiver forthe same may be needed from the Review Committee.

5.4 The proposal from Industrial Processors & Metallizers Pvt. Ltd. on CuttingEdge Robotic Laser Cladding Technology for Hydro Turbines Indigenously usingTungsten Carbide Powder for the sector of Heavy Electrical & Power Plant Equipment.Project involves Technology Acquisition of Robotic Laser Cladding to increase the lifetimeof critical Hydro Turbines Components by minimizing erosion, corrosion and wear with astrong metallurgical bond and high deposition rate as a substitute of present HP-HVOFtechnology. The experts, Prof. L M Das (technical) and Mr. Ranjit Datta (financial) whojoined the due-diligence recommended for partial support to the project.

5.4.1 Financial Summary submitted by the Applicant as per Application Submission:

Technology Acquisition cost Sources of Fundin..KParticulars Amount Particulars AmountCost of Technology & associated 3,38,68,624 Contribution by Acquirer 2,48,77,799modificationAccessories/Software/Specialized 33,09,880 Others, if any -Training related to ProposedTechnologyLogistic & Installation Cost 19,07,200 Fund requested from 2,48,77,799

(Amount in INR Lakhs)

Page 7 of 11

F No. 12/8/2016-HE & MT

DHIlGITAExcise/Import Duty, Taxes, etc. 1,06,69,894Total Cost of Technology 4,97,55,598 Total Sources of Funding 4,97,55,598

5.4.2 Prof. L M Das, IIT Delhi has mentioned that Laser Cladding is a high precisionsurface coating technology and has a tremendous relevance for various underwatercomponents of hydropower sector, which can be coated with high deposition efficiency,better accuracy and at a lesser energy consumption. At present, India does not have muchexposure to this technology and application of the same to the Indian Hydropower sector willactually save significant down time and damage of resources. Therefore the project should besupported.

5.4.3 Dr. S Biswas, BHEL stated that IPM is already working with BHEL in the hydroturbine sector and significantly contributing towards saving of national resources andtherefore the project can be supported.

5.4.4 Dr.A Bhattacharjee, DMRL stated that considering the wider applications, it isrecommended that the project of laser cladding coating technology citing its applicationrelevant for aerospace sector as well which is currently being outsourced from outsidecountry and therefore brings lot of relevance.

5.4.5 It was clarified that eligible funding under TAFP scheme will be limited to 25% onlyas per the guidelines.

5.4.6 The committee also suggested the applicant to share the technology cost break-up inwhich technology know-how and other services are detailed out. However, the applicant hasexpressed that the technology is an integral part of the equipment and therefore it is difficultfor them to segregate the two and give an individual cost break-up.

5.5 Screening Committee noted the observations of Internal Scrutiny Group in respect ofmajor expenditure in these proposals is in terms of procuring/importing different high endmachines under the TAFP and the Gazette Notification clauses in this regard (lO.(a) to lO.g(g). Observation of Director, CMTI"regarding the projects amounting to importing high endmachines with operating knowhow to provide solutions/end products that are primarilyimported, was also noted.

5.6 Screening Committee noted that the "technology" as such has not been defined underthe Scheme; though technology gaps are identified under the 12th five year working groupreport. However the experts from IIT and DST strongly mentioned that there can be notechnology without the machine. Learning process knowhow is a definitive must requirementfor technology assimilation and machineries & process knowhow is supported by DST in itstechnology development projects. S.K. Varshney, Scientist G, DST has in writing evincedsupport for the same and has strongly recommended all the four proposals. Further, GITA hasalso strongly recommended all these projects, specifically based on these technologies beingniche, primarily imported and not known to be available in the country, to the best of theirknowledge.

Page 8 of 11

F No. 12/8/2016-HE & MT

5.7 As per the scheme stipulation "For each technology transfer approval, theGovernment shall have every right to transfer the technology to other manufacturers, if it isrequired, after hiiO years of the approval in the case of the technology transfer underTechnology Acquisition Fund Programme. " Since these are not the cases of IPR purchase,knowhow detailing and knowhow sharing after the lock in period needs to be defined

5.8 In view of above deliberations and specifically in view of the opinion of experts andDST on the definition of "technology", Screening Committee decided to recommend theproposals to Apex Committee subject to para 5.7 above, as per the following observation

(i) Allied Cables (for specialized power cables), subject to confirmation by DIPP,further cost breakup details, knowhow detailing, IPR Guidelines and the fundinglimited to 25% of the total project cost

(ii) Motif Capacitors (for segmented film industrial capacitors) subject to confirmationby DIPP, further cost breakup details, knowhow detailing, 1J>RGuidelines and thefunding limited to 25% of the total project cost

(iii) PTC Industries' proposal for Titanium Zirconium & Exotic Alloy Castings,knowhow detailing, subject to IPR Guidelines and the funding limited to 25% ofthe total project cost

(iv) Industrial Processors & Metallizers Pvt. Ltd. on Cutting Edge Robotic LaserCladding Technology for Hydro Turbines subject to knowhow detailing, IPRGuidelines and the funding limited to 25% of the total project cost

6. The meeting ended with vote of thanks to the Chair.

Page 9 of 11

F No. 12/8/2016-HE & MT

ANNEXURE

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF 4th SCREENING COMMITTEE MEETINGHELD ON AUGUST 30.2016 AT 1100 HRS AT UDYOG BHAVAN

S.No. Name & Designation Ministry/ Contact No. E-mail addressDepartment

l. Shri Vishvajit Sahai Deptt.ofH.I. 01123061858 vishvajit.sahay@nic.inJoint Secretary (HE&MT)

- In Chair2. Ms. Ritu Pande, Deptt. of H.I. 01123062182 ritu.pande@gov.in

Director (HE & MT)3. Shri Sushil Lakra, Deptt. ofH.I. 01123061280 slakra@nic.in

Industrial Adviser4. Shri A M Manichan Deptt. ofR.I. 01123063439 am.manichan@nic.in

Deputy Secretary (lFW)5. Sanjay Chavre Deptt. of H.I. 01123063692 sanjay.chavre@nic.in

Senior Development Officer6. Shri N. L. Goswami Deptt.ofR.I. 01123063176 nl.goswami@nic.in

Senior Development Officer7. Dr. Amit Bhattacharjee DefencelDRD 9000111725 amitb@dmrl.drdo.in

Scientist 'G' O/DMRLHydrabad

8. Prof. R.Balasubramanian, I.I.T.Dellhi 9618815347 rbmanian47@gmail.comRetd.NTPC Chair Professor, 1.l.T.Delhi

9. Dr. Punit Singh lISC Bangalore 9483018102 punitsingh@

10. Dr. Pranab Samanto CSIR-CMERl. 9126714635 Q.samanto@cmeri.res.inDurgapur

1l. Dr. Lalgopal Das, Senior CSIR-CMERI 8158953007 Igdas@cmeri.res.inScientistiSenio Scientist Durgapur West Idas20ratr:ahoo.co.in

Bangol12. S. Biswas, Director (E.R&D) BHEL 8527050066 biswas@bhe1.in

CorporationOffice NewDelhi

13. Pravin K.Gupta/ Chartered GITA 9810019342 gugtakscor@gmail.comAccountant

14. Ranjit Datta GITA 9999567285 datta ranjit01hotmail.com

15. R.Rajendran TMMA 8144921201 rajendran.r@cmw.co.inChairman

16. S.Krishnaswamy TMMA 9717019444

17. EM. Sambath Kumar, Accountant GNST& 9962326699 auditorsam((i),gmail.comASSOCIATES

18. B.V.S.S.S.Prasadi Professor I.I.T.Madras 9840069487 Qrasad@iitm.ac.in

19. K.V.Karthik V.P.Sitarc SITARC 9894296960 karthik@decconindustries.com

20. M.Sundaram , PSG Tech PSG 9487018281 msm@rae ..dsstech.ac.in

21. Ashutosh Goel, CEO Allied Engg 9350830840 goelashutosh@yahoo.comWorkesPvt.Ltd.

22. Ramakrishnan N. DSIDOC

Page 10 of 11

FNo. 12/8/2016-HE & MT

23. S.K. Varshney Adviser DST 26525594 skvdstrdmic.in

24. D.C.Joshi, Chief Business Dev. NRDC 9910496565 djoshi@nrdc.in

25. S.P.Katmanni/ Director TEXTILES 9871716671 sQ.katamanni@nic.in

26. Pankaj M. Trivedi SETU 09825136807Foundation hxdroQreumatic@hotmail.com(TMMA)

27. Latesh B. Chandhari SETU 9898673451 ibc.fetr(aJ.gmail.comFoundation

28. Pankaj B. Kannaujya SETU 9998530475 Qankaj kannauixa@xahoo.comFoundation

29. Sachin Kumar TMMA (I) 9342592520 sachin@tmmaindia.net

30. Rahul Sood MIS Industrial 9810162695 rahul sood0l,iQmQl.co.inM.D.& Director Tech Processors &

Metallizers (P)ltd.

31. Sachin Agarwal PTC Industrial 9335811493 sachin(aJ.Qtci l.com

32. P .L.N.Murthy US.DIPP 9910949238 Qln.murthv@nic.in

33. Dr. S. Ganguly GITA 9910241641 sUQrotim.gagulx(aJ.cii.in

34. S. Satish Kumar DlPP, CMTI, 9449842677 sati sh .cmti@,nic.in,director.cmtieanic.in

35. Hetal Mehta SETU 985173595 haQl2xeng(aJ.xahoo.comFoundation

36. Dr. Z.M.Das , Professor Ll.T. Delhi 9868112900 Iindos 1(aJ.hotmail.com

37. Ms. Sona Pradeep, GlTA 8800565565 sona.Qradeel2@gita.org.inDeputy Director-Strategic Project Mamagement

38. Samrat Ghatak Deputy GlTA 8527233163 samrat.ghatak0),gita.org.inDirector-Strategic ProjectManagement

39. Rakesh Kumar 0/0 DC 9871499767 rakesh96@xahoo.comDy. Director (MSME)

40. Mohit Rai Goyal Motif. capacitor Motif 9999414134 mohitraiCalmotifca12.comPvt.Ltd. director Capacitor

Pvt.Ltd.41. Dr. chaitali bhattachanya/ Technology 9560003646 chaitali.tdb@gmail.com

Scientist 'D' DevelopmentBoard

Page 11 of 11