NNEC Governance & Mid-Term Planssesam.smart-lab.se/seminarier/Hostsem07/ACT.pdf · MTP MTP...

NATO UNCLASSIFIED

NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED 1

17 September 2007

NNEC Governance &

Mid-Term Plans

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


• Overview – What is NNEC?

• Strategic Framework Update

• Governance

• Mid-Term Plans

• Questions & Comments

Outline

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


What is IS/NNEC?

• NATO Network Enabled Capability is the

Alliance’s ability to federate the various

components of the operational

environment, from the strategic level

(including NATO HQ) down to the tactical

levels, through a networking and

information infrastructure (NII).

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


UAV

Ground

Station

Access to informationAccess to information

Remote

Calculation

Air coordination centre

Tactical Sensor

Remote HQ

Image

Interpretation

system

Sensor

Air effectors

X

XX

CollaborationCollaboration

Coordination &

Fusion centre

Information SharingInformation Sharing

Data transportData transport

Info assurance Info assurance

HQ

NNEC in Action

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Development of otherDevelopment of other

Transformation Objective AreasTransformation Objective Areas

NEC National InitiativesNEC National Initiatives

and Coordinationand Coordination• NNEC Foundation

Document

• MCM-0038-2005

• Comprehensive

Political Guidance

NNEC Strategic Framework

NNEC Strategic Framework

Vision and Concept

Architecture

Management Approach

Roadmap

Detailed Plan(s)

• NNEC Feasibility

Study

• Programs of Work

• Commercial world

• Transformation

Objective Areas

inputs

2005 2006 2007

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Leadership

and

Guidance

Architecture &

Service Def. &

Specification

Operational

Concepts and

Requirements

Implications

Implementation

Coherence Areas

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


• Provide NNEC input to concept development.

• Establish an operational maturity model.

• Propose operational maturity level targets.

• Prioritize operational service requirements.

• Coordinate NNEC-related needs for operational

experimentation.

• Recommend operational improvements.

Operational Concepts and

Requirements Implications

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


• Develop and agree NATO Service Oriented

Architectures (SOAs).

• Develop and agree service definitions.

• Establish a services maturity model.

Architecture and Service

Definition & Specification

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


• Establish the forecast of services availability.

• Perform services availability gap analyses.

• Recommend programmatic changes.

• Recommend improvements to the capability

planning process.

• Coordinate test and evaluation activities.

Implementation

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


• Support NNEC governance.

• Provision of coordination body resources.

• Establish coordination mechanisms with non-

NATO bodies.

• Establish and recommend coherent NNEC-

related policies.

• Agree NNEC level of ambition (LoA).

• Development of plans.

• Development of awareness and education.

Leadership and Guidance

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Coordination Body

4 Coherence Areas

Nations NATO Industry

Contributors

L&G

NNEC Gov Body

Decision Bodies

NC3B

Cross-

coordination

Governance

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Operational Needs

Operational

Needs

Operational

Needs

NNEC - What has to be

governed ?

NNEC

Governance

NATO

NEC NATO

Nations

NEC

OTHER

NEC

Capabilities

Capabilities

Capabilities Capabilities

Capabilities

CapabilitiesCapabilities

Capabilities

Capabilities

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Why – Planning Disciplines

• Need a mechanism to coordinate

realization activities across the various

planning disciplines

– Force Planning

– Armaments Planning

– Resource Planning

• Senior Resource Board

• MBC

– C2 Planning

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Capability Master Plan (CMP)

Capability Area

Improvement Programs (CAIPs)

Capability

Architecture

CAFJO

Strategic

Guidance

CPG

TOA

Transformation

Goals

TOA TOA TOA TOA TOA TOA

Cap Cap Cap Cap ProgrammingLevel

Concept

Development

Projects

Experimentation

Projects

Research Technology

Projects

Capability Packages

Projects

TrainingProjects

Capability Area

Plans (CAP)

PlanningLevel

Capability Development

Process – Overview

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Why - Planning Coherence

FPsFPs R&DR&DCPsCPs Pol &Pol &

StdsStdsExpExp Bottom-up DevelopmentBottom-up Development

& Implementation & Implementation

Top-down DirectionTop-down Direction

MTPMTP MTPMTP Coherence between Coherence between

Top-down and Bottom-upTop-down and Bottom-upMTPMTP

Need a mechanism to coordinate C3 related activities across force planning,Need a mechanism to coordinate C3 related activities across force planning,

armaments planning, C2 planning, resource planningarmaments planning, C2 planning, resource planning

OtherOther

TOASTOAS

NNECNNEC

SFSF

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


NNEC Related C3 MTPs

• Predominantly Bottom-up

– No means to define meaningful objectives from top-downdirection (NNEC SF, Overarching Capability Architecture)

– Services not yet defined

– Architecture products not yet delivered

– No means to measure progress – NML work in progress

– Bottom-up provides a real world starting point

• NNEC FS and Architecture Framework used as the foundation

• Compliance with C3 Capability Management Directive

• Remain consistent with ACT’s proposed Capability DevelopmentProcess

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Time Dimension

Mid TermMid Term

Near TermNear Term

MTPs

Meet specific nearMeet specific near

term objectivesterm objectives

Ensure mid-termEnsure mid-term

coherencecoherence

Longer TermLonger Term

Driven by ourDriven by our

longer termlonger term

NNEC SFNNEC SF

VisionVision

3-6 yr3-6 yr

1-2 yr1-2 yr

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


• NNEC related C3 Mid-Term Plans intended to be 5-6

year ‘roadmaps’ for coordinating development and

implementation (“mid-term plans”) efforts

– Output focused - enhancing mission effectiveness

– ‘Common sense’ groupings of related tasks

– Realistic level of ambition for coherence

• A management & coherency tool intended to

encompass:

– Changes to existing projects

– Introduction of new projects

– NATO and national contributions


NATO UNCLASSIFIED


• NNEC-related C3 Mid-Term Plans intended to:– be limited to C3 part of NNEC

– be catalyst to transition:• from system centric to a Service Oriented Approach,

• how programs will deliver capabilities/services.

• Need to focus on:– Delivery of defined capability/service components

through:• existing programs (Bi-SC AIS, Comms, ACCS…),

• force proposals (interaction with Nations)

• other activities ( Experimentation, R&D, ConceptDevelopment, interaction with Industry, COEs, …)


NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Proposed Initial Set of NNEC

Related C3 MTPs

• Common COIServices

• COI Services

– Land C2

– Maritime C2

– Air C2

– Logistics C2

– Spec Forces C2

– CBRN C2

– Intel C2

• Core Enterprise Services

• Communication Services

• Service Management &

Control

• Information Assurance

• Interoperability

Standardization

• Architecture Roadmap

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Where We Are

• Proposed Mid-Term Plans are fully consistent with theNNEC FS and NNEC Architecture compendium (NNECSF)– However, need to define scope & objectives,

interdependencies, priority

• C3 community agreed with ACT approach & initial setof plans:– C3 COI endorsed approach (Mar 2007).

– Agreed to set up C3 COI tiger teams to identify MTPs of near-term priority interest (July 2007).

• NC3B and Nations through its Sub-Committees (SC1 /C3C working group) and others….

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


• Align next DRR cycle focus areas with MTPs.

• Assess interdependencies and update MTPs.– Interdependencies within each MTP

– Interdependencies among / across the MTPs

• Ensure service-centric approach is reflected in all MTPs.– Bottom-up approach in some MTPs is still too system-centric

• Increase participation of the operational community(e.g., update existing CONOPs and/or ensure futureCONOPs reflect NNEC approach).

• Link with Top-Down guidance:– NNEC Strategic framework (Detailed Plan)

– C3 MTPs /CAIPS with Capability Architecture, as emerges

Way Ahead

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


• Define for each plan objectives, milestones, coreactivities, and interdependencies:– Prerequisite : defining scope and objectives based on

architecture products ( # NMLs, Service definitions, Interfaceprofiles)

• Architecture & Standardization MTPs support all otherplans (need to coordinate and harmonize)

• Define minimum criteria to initiate/prioritize plans

• Ideally: All plans should be developed in parallel, butdue to resource limitations, …..

• Prioritisation based on objectives and scope and projects withineach plan, interdependencies between capabilities/servicecomponents (comms /core...)

• Focus on 3-4 priority plans : 1 COI service (Land or Joint C2 ),Core services and sub-set of Communications Services, IAservices ? to demonstrate value and keep momentum,

Way Ahead

NATO UNCLASSIFIED


Questions?

NNEC Governance & Mid-Term Planssesam.smart-lab.se/seminarier/Hostsem07/ACT.pdf · MTP MTP...

Documents

Transcript of NNEC Governance & Mid-Term Planssesam.smart-lab.se/seminarier/Hostsem07/ACT.pdf · MTP MTP...