NMR Training 2009

72
NMR Training for Advanced Users Huaping Mo Summer, 2009 http://www.pinmrf.purdue.edu http://people.pharmacy.purdue.edu/~hmo/index.htm

Transcript of NMR Training 2009

Page 1: NMR Training 2009

NMR Trainingfor Advanced Users

Huaping Mo

Summer, 2009

http://www.pinmrf.purdue.eduhttp://people.pharmacy.purdue.edu/~hmo/index.htm

Page 2: NMR Training 2009

Overview• Our facility

– PINMRF: Purdue Interdepartmental Facility (http://www.pinmrf.purdue.edu)– Staff include John Harwood (director, D.Sc), Huaping Mo (associate director, Ph.D.), Jerry

Hirschinger (engineer) and other members.

• Our capabilities– 800MHz, 600MHz, 500 MHz (2), 400 MHz(2) and 300MHz (4)– Observe almost all NMR active nuclei– Detect as low as 1 M to as high as 100 M proton concentrations– VT from -80°C to above 100°C*– Many problems can be converted to and addressed by NMR observables!

• Our expertise– Various 1D, 2D and 3D experiments– Novel pulse sequence development and simulations– Structural determinations– Quantitative analysis– NMR hardware trouble shooting and repair

• Our track record– Mo, Harwood et al. J. Magn. Reson., in press; Ye, Mo et al. Anal. Chem. 2009; Mo & Raftery

Anal. Chem. 2008; Bai, Mo, Shapiro, Bioorg Med Chem, 2008; Mo & Raftery J. Bio. NMR, 2008; Mo & Raftery J. Magn. Reson. 2008

– Acknowledged in a number of publications (Thank you!)– Determined the structures for a series of novel natural products / metabolites

Page 3: NMR Training 2009

A schematic Diagram for NMR

probetuning

network

Mz

transmitter

receiver

raw FID

90

excitation

observation

R

FT

g(RG)

ADC FID

pulse calib/angle

receiver gain

function

receiving efficiency

spectral analysi

s

spectral processing

pulse sequence

Shims; chemical shift; coupling;

line-shape; relaxation;

exchange; , c & V

NMR signal: A = A0 * * c * V *R *sin()*I()*g(RG)

RF properties;

I()

© Huaping Mo, 2009

Page 4: NMR Training 2009

Insider scoops: a systematic approach for NMR quantitation

• Receiving efficiency (Mo et al. J. Magn. Reson. in press)– conceptually, it is similar to extinction coefficient in UV spectroscopy in

characterizing how efficient a unit magnetization can be detected– Receiving efficiency can be pre-calibrated as a function of 90° degree pulse

length– receiving efficiency is the same for all nuclei of the same type (indifferent to

chemical shifts) in the same sample

• Receiver gain function (to be submitted)– how much gain is actually achieved by the receiver

• Solvent signal offers a universal and robust concentration internal standard (Mo & Raftery Anal. Chem. 2008)

– Normalized NMR signal size is strictly proportional to the concentration for a given sample, regardless how concentrated or dilute the sample is

– Unit magnetization generates the same amount of total NMR response in the RF coil, which is indifferent to chemical shift or line-shape

– No need to make additional internal or external standard

Page 5: NMR Training 2009

Common Misconceptions

• You need to prepare either an internal or external concentration reference for quantitative NMR

• You need a chemical shift referencing compound in a hetero-nuclear spectrum

• A compound has to be in a deuterated solvent to be observed by NMR

• You need to separate the compound to find out if it is right or how much is there

Page 6: NMR Training 2009

Outlines for this talk• Basic preparations for NMR: safety, sample, lock, shim and tune

• Understanding NMR: excitation and observation

• RF pulse calibration

• Data acquisition: sweep width, carrier freq. and # of scans etc.

• NMR observables:– Chemical shift, scalar couplings, NOE and relaxations

• Chemical shift referencing

• Introduction to basic 2D's

• Simulations for spin systems, pulses and sequences

• Basic operation demonstrations

Page 7: NMR Training 2009

Sample• Basic requirements:

– Proton observe: 1 uM or more– Cabron observe: 1 mg or more– Volume: 300 ul or more– Solvent: most solvents will do;10% deuterated solvent is

sufficient for locking– Spectrometers can be run without lock (deuterium).

• Rule #1: for Bruker NMR spectrometers, the NMR tube insert cannot exceed max depth (19mm or 20mm) from the center of the RF coil

– Longer insert than recommended may present problems for the probe, as well as cause frictions during spinning

– Varian is more flexible in allowing longer insert

• Rule #2: center of NMR sample should be as close as possible to the center of RF coil.

– Normal sample needs to about 500 ul or slight more– Too much solvent is a waste!– Too little solvent may make shim difficult, but it does

work!

20mm

~18mm Coil CenterRF coil

Page 8: NMR Training 2009

Samples of smaller volumes

• Follow rule # 1 and then rule #2

• Shimming might be challenging due to air/glass and air/solution interfaces– Bubbles should be avoided

• Consider Shigemi tubes

• Be careful with spinning– Non-spinning is recommended for

volume ~ 300 ul or less– 500 ul is sufficient for a regular tube

300ul 400ul 500ul

Page 9: NMR Training 2009

Sensitivity for smaller volumes

• Volume less than 300 ul may not offer additionally sensitivity improvement over that achieved by 300 ul, if the total amount of analyte is constant

• For a regular tube, larger volume helps shims/line-shape, but not sensitivity directly

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 200 400 600 800 1000

volume (ul)

rela

tiv

e s

en

sti

vit

y

Page 10: NMR Training 2009

Tune and match the probe

• Why do we need tune and match (wobb)?

– For best pulses and sensitivity

• Only higher fields (500, 600 and 800 HMz) in our facility need tuning

– Lower field probes have been tuned!

• Most of the time only proton requires tuning

• Drx500-2 with BBO needs special attention

– Proton always needs tuning– BB (used for 13C or 31P etc) channel needs

tuning, by first setting the numbers to the pre-set values

Frequency

tunematch

RF

ref

lect

ion Carrier frequency

Page 11: NMR Training 2009

Significance of tuning/matching

• Shorter 90° pulse – More efficient use of RF power

• Protects transmitter

– More uniform excitation in high power

• Better sensitivity– Reciprocity: if excitation is efficient,

then detection is equally efficient

• Potentially quantitative:– NMR signal size is about inversely

proportional to the 90° pulse length 0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

8 10 12 14

90 degree pulse length (s)

NM

R s

ign

al s

ize

Page 12: NMR Training 2009

Recognizing Bruker probe types

Dials for broadband (BB) tuning/matching

BBO probe on drx500-2 TXI probe

magnet

BB Dialing stick

Tabulated values for BB tuning/matching

1H tuning/matching rods are labeled as yellow

Side-view

Bottom-view

Side-view

Do not touch those!

Page 13: NMR Training 2009

Lock

• Lock depends on shims: bad shims make bad lock– Initialize shims by reading a set of good shims (i.e. rsh shims.txi)– Inheriting a shim set from previous users may present difficulties – Unusual samples (esp. small volumes) may need significant z1/z2

adjustments

• Use “lock_solvent” or “lock” command – The default (Bruker) chemical shift may appear as dramatically changed

if the spectrometer assumes another solvent

• Avoid excessive lock power – Lock signal may go up and down if lock power is too high due to

saturation of deuterium signal– Apply sufficient lock power and gain so that lock does not drift to

another resonance (this may happen by auto-lock if multiple deuterium signals exist)

Page 14: NMR Training 2009

Shims• The goal of shimming is to make the total magnetic field within the

active volume homogeneous (preferably <1Hz).Total magnetic field = static field (superconductor) + cryoshim (factory set) + RT shim (user adjust) + lock field

• Shimming can be done either manually or by gradient, which can be very efficient and consistent if done properly

• Sample spinning may improve shims– However, spinning-side bands appear

• Recommendations:– Start from a known good shim set (by rsh on bruker or rts on varian).– Do not inherit shims from other users unless you know they’re good– Non-spinning and higher order (spinning) shims should not change

dramatically from sample to sample for most applications

Page 15: NMR Training 2009

Lock: lock gainrecommended not recommended

higher lock gain

may easily lose lock;change in lock level (during shimming) is less visible

Lower lock level due to lower lock gain

Page 16: NMR Training 2009

Lock: avoid high lock powerGood lock Bad lock

unstable and lower lock signal

Lock power okay

Lock power too high

Page 17: NMR Training 2009

Evaluate shims• Look for a sharp peak

– No clear distortion– Full width at half height should be about 1 Hz or less for small molecules– Small (1% or smaller) or free of spinning side-bands

• Check if peak distortions are individual or universal

• Make sure that phasing is not causing peak distortions

• Maximize the lock level– Higher lock level => better shim

• Lock level does not drop significantly when spinning is turned off– Small (<1%) or no spinning side-bands

Page 18: NMR Training 2009

Shim by line-shape

Plot made by G. Pearson, U. Iowa, 1991

z4 too small z4 too big make z4 smaller first

Page 19: NMR Training 2009

Understanding NMR• Modern NMR spectrum is an

emission spectrum

• Equilibrium state– Magnetization is along +z axis– It is desired to have the largest

+z magnetization prior to excitation

• Excitation by a RF pulse– A projection of magnetization is

made on xy plane– It is desired to have the largest

xy plane project for observation

• Observation– Precession of the projected xy-

plane magnetization

Page 20: NMR Training 2009

RF pulses• RF pulse manipulates spins

– Important in excitation and decoupling– Defined by length, power and shape

• RF power is expressed in decibels– Bruker

• Power range: typically 0db (high power) to 120db (low power)

– Varian: • Coarse power: typically 60db (high) to 0db (low); 1 db increment;

absolute• Fine power: 4095 (high) to 0 (low); default is 4095; relative

– e.g. 54.5db can be roughly achieved through setting coarse power to 55 and fine power to 3854

coarse attenuator fine attenuatorin out

Page 21: NMR Training 2009

RF pulse calibration

• Hard pulse (high power pulse) can be calibrated directly or indirectly

• For best calibrations, pulses need to be on resonance (know the chemical shift or resonance frequency!)

• Soft or shaped pulsed can be first calculated and then fine-tuned to optimum – Shapetool (by Bruker) or Pbox (by Varian) can be used for

calculation and simulation– Be aware of possible minute phase shift (several degrees for

soft pulses), which can be critical in water flip back or watergate

Page 22: NMR Training 2009

Proton pulse calibration• Most hard (highest power) 90° pulses are typically from 5 us to

20 us.• High power pulse for proton (or other heteronuclei if sensitivity is

sufficient) is directly calibrated– 360° method (not quite sensitive to radiation damping or relaxation)– 180° method

First pulse with 2 us; 2 us increment

90º

180º

270º

360º

90º

450º180º

270º

360º

Page 23: NMR Training 2009

NMR observables

• Chemical shifts– Expressed in ppm; reflects chemical environment

• Scalar couplings– Expressed in Hz; causing splitting / broadenings in 1D– 2D or nD bond correlations

• NOEs / relaxation / line-shapes– Reveals distance/conformation information

• Peak size– Potentially useful in quantitative analysis

Page 24: NMR Training 2009

Chemical shifts

• Reflects chemical environment:– Ring current effect

• Outside: high ppm• Inside: low ppm

– Effect of electron withdrawing groups

• Donating: low ppm• Withdrawing: high ppm

Page 25: NMR Training 2009

Chemical shifts of solvents/impurities

Gottlieb et al. JOC 1997

Page 26: NMR Training 2009

Example: aliasing

(from arx300) aliased from 0 ppm with phase distortion,because the peak is out of the “detection window”

sw=16ppm

okay

aliased

• Oversampled proton spectrum on higher fields (500 – 800 MHz) does not have the aliasing issue: peaks outside of sw will disappear

Page 27: NMR Training 2009

Spectral aliasing (cont’d)

• In direct observe dimension, spectral aliasing is generally avoided by either increasing spectral width (sw) or moving center frequency (sfo1)

• Sometimes the indirect detection dimension (in nD spectrum) may intentionally adopt aliasing to improve resolution in that dimension

Page 28: NMR Training 2009

Scalar coupling (J)

AB system“roofing”

JABJAB

A B

1

1:1

1:2:1

1:3:3:1

Scalar coupling:• proportional to gyromagnetic ratio• through bond/electrons• split into 2nI + 1 lines.

Page 29: NMR Training 2009

Scalar coupling: simulation helps!

Observed at 300 MHz

simulated

P O

R2O

O

O

R1

H

H a

b12Hz

8Hz

8Hz

Ha and Hb are not exactly equivalent, withchemical shift difference of 0.025ppm

These are not impurities!

pro-chiral!

ssb

Page 30: NMR Training 2009

Example:satellites and spinning side-bands

TMS

6.6 Hz; 29Si satellites; 2.3% each

ssb: 20 Hz or multiple of 20Hz

from center

~120 Hz; 13C satellites; 0.55% each

Page 31: NMR Training 2009

Relaxation

• T1 relaxation allows magnetization to recover back to +z axis– Nuclei with larger gyromagnetic ratios (resonance

frequencies) tend to relax faster• 1H: 0.1 – 10 s (proteins have short T1’s)• 13C, 15N, 31P: much longer than 1H

– Nuclei in a proton rich environment tend to relax faster

• T2 relaxation contributes to the observed resonance line-shape– T2~T1 for small molecules– Line-width offers an estimate of T2

Page 32: NMR Training 2009

Line-shape

• Full Width at Half Maximum is 1/(T2*) Hz, with T2

* as apparent spin lattice relaxation time

• Magnetic inhomogeneity (shim) can increase FWHM (2) or distort the line-shape (reduce T2*)

• T1 > T2 > T2*

• Small molecules– 1H: T1 ~ T2 in the order of seconds– 13C: seconds to tens of seconds; even longer if no

proton attached (CO and quaternary)

• Large molecules– 1H: T1 ~ T2 hundreds of mini-seconds or shorter– 13C: seconds or sub-seconds

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

off set (Hz)

FWHM (2)

Lorentzian: A()= / (2 + (-)2)2=1/(T2

*)

Page 33: NMR Training 2009

Lorentzian peak Integration

0 n (2)-n (2) n

inte

gra

tion

Page 34: NMR Training 2009

Multiple chemical environments:chemical or conformational exchange

• Fundamentally, chemical shift reflects chemical environment surrounding a nucleus’

• Multiple chemical environments may alter chemical shift or even cause significant peak broadening

Fast exchange

slow exchange

Jin, Phy. Chem. Chem. Phys. (1999)

Page 35: NMR Training 2009

(N)H line-shape: influence of relaxation and scalar coupling

JNH ~65 Hz

Slow 14N relaxation (compared to JNH)

medium14N relxation

this might be the very reason why CHCl3 proton appears as a singlet though JH-35Cl and JH-37Cl exist

In addition to chemical exchange, (N)H proton line-shape is also influenced by the coupled nucleus 14N

Fast relaxation

Page 36: NMR Training 2009

Examples of (N)H resonance

Hz

NH4Cl in DMSO. Triplet is due to 14N coupling (52 Hz)

800MHz

500MHz

300MHz

Urea in water (6% D2O)

no 14N decoupling

14N decoupling

Page 37: NMR Training 2009

Direct observe: 31P, 13C or 15N

• 19F, 31P and 13C can be observed directly on all PINMRF 300 and 400 MHz instruments (please follow local PINMRF instructions)

• 13C can be observed on higher fields (500 MHz and above), without any cable change

• Drx500-2 with BBO probe offers higher sensitivity for 31P, 13C, 15N and most other heteronuclei (19F excluded)– Observed nucleus needs to be cabled to x-broadband pre-

amplifier– BBO tuning is needed for both proton and observed nucleus– Double check filters if re-cabled

Page 38: NMR Training 2009

Direct observe: 31P, 13C or 15N

• Satellite peaks can frequently be indirectly observed in proton spectrum (so that we know the less sensitive heteronuclei are there to be observed directly!)

• Decoupling of proton may improve signal by– Sharper peaks– NOE– Proton channel has to be tuned!

Page 39: NMR Training 2009

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

0 2 4 6 8 10

hc

NO

E +

1H

P

C

N

Dipolar coupling: NOE

• NOE depends on correlation time (molecule size) and resonance frequency

• NOE does not always enhance the observed signal

15N

1H

31P

13C

Molecule size

Temperature

Page 40: NMR Training 2009

NOE implication in Quantification

• The observed nucleus should be free of interference from other nuclei

• Pre-saturation in aqueous samples may not be appropriate for accurate quantification– Small molecules tend to gain signal size due to

positive NOE from saturated water– Large molecules tend to lose signal size due to spin

diffusion

Page 41: NMR Training 2009

Improving sensitivity: receiver gain

• Receiver gain needs to be maximized which frequently requires good water suppression

• Avoiding excessive large receiver gain (for signal clipping)

• Excessive acquisition time may end up with spending time collecting noise and down-grade signal-to-noise ratio

sensitivity vs receiver gain(arx300; chloform signal)

0 100 200 300 400 500receiver gain

S/N

Page 42: NMR Training 2009

Improving sensitivity: Ernst angle

• Acquire more scans in a given amount of time

• Use Ernst angle for excitation:

cos = exp(-Tc/T1)

• Increase concentration and lower the solvent / salt amount

Tc/T1

Pulse angle (degrees)

sens

itivi

ty

Page 43: NMR Training 2009

Missing a carbonyl carbonpresumably due to insufficient

relaxation

About 5 mg in CD3OD. 2800 scans (~4 hrs)

O OR

NHOH

R'

OH

O

? Missing a carbonyl

Page 44: NMR Training 2009

Solution: Use H2O

Why it works:

• Carbonyl 13C is reduced due to presence of a proton rich environment in H2O.

• Potential intra-molecular hydrogen bond is weakened or broken, and decoupled from ring movement

In H2O:D2O (1:1). 1400 scans (~2 hrs).

O OR

NHOH

R'

OH

O

Page 45: NMR Training 2009

1D acquisition for very long hours

• Helpful– Split long experiments into smaller blocks and save

data regularly (multiple data can always be summed if needed): multizg

– Dissolve the compound in water (H2O) might be helpful (shorter relaxation time)

– Lower sample temperature may help

• Not helpful– Save several days’ data into one single FID– Use 300 ul or less volatile solvent

Page 46: NMR Training 2009

Chemical shift referencing

• 1H chemical shift can be readily referenced by the solvent signal or TSP/TMS

• Heteronuclei can be indirectly referenced, by PROTON chemical shift!– No need to have a separate internal or

external reference

Page 47: NMR Training 2009

From 1D to 2D

1D

time domain frequency domain

1

FT

t2

2D

time domains

2

FT(t2)

t2

t1t1

FT(t1)

2

1

frequency domains

Page 48: NMR Training 2009

2D NMR• Correlate resonances through bond or space

– COSY: coupling• Magnitude mode recommended. • 1 mg or less will do• Minutes to a couple of hours

– TOCSY: coupling network• ~ 70 ms mixing time• 1 mg or less will do• An hour or longer

– NOESY / ROESY: distance / NOE• Mixing time ranging from less than 100 ms (proteins) to 500 ms (small molecules)• 1 mg or more• Hours or longer

– HSQC/HMQC: proton correlation to X, typically through one-bond scalar couplings (two or three bond correlation possible)

• 1mg or less will do• An hour or longer

– HMBC: proton correlation to X, through multiple bond scalar couplings• 1 mg or more• Hours or longer

Page 49: NMR Training 2009

2D NMR• Resolve overlapping peaks

– Resolution is provided largely through the indirect dimension

– No need to have highest resolution in the direct detected dimension

• Limit direct acquisition time to 100ms or less if heteronuclear decoupling is turned on

• Lower decoupling power if longer acquisition time is needed

– Change in experimental conditions may help

Page 50: NMR Training 2009

2D NMR essentials: acquisition• Proton tuning and matching• Calibration of proton (90 degree) pulse length

– Standard pulse lengths can be used if the solution is not highly ionic (< 50 mM NaCl equivalent)– All proton pulses are likely getting longer if the solution is ionic and/or the probe is not tuned

• Modest receiver gain– rg about half of what rga gives or less

• Carrier frequency (center of spectrum in Hz) and SW (sweep width) in both dimensions (avoid aliasing unless intended to)

• Number of scans (NS)– The pulse program recommends NS (a integer times 1, 2, 4, 8 or 16)– Needs some dummy scans, especially with decoupling / tocsy

• Number of increments in the indirect dimension (td1)– Larger td1 improves resolution in the indirect dimension– Rarely exceeds 512 (except occasionally in COSY

• Detection method in the indirect dimension– Determined by the pulse program– Typically is either states (and/or TPPI) or echo-antiecho

• Acquisition time (aq) less than 100 ms with decoupling• Modest gradients (cannot be more than the full power of 100% and typically less than 2 ms in

duration) • Go through the pulse program if you really care

Page 51: NMR Training 2009

2D processing• Window functions

– Allow FID to approach zero at the end of the acquisition time– Sine bell functions with some shifts are recommended most of the time

• Zero filling– Typically double data points in each dimension

• Phasing– Indirect dimension 0th and 1st order corrections are recommended in the pulse

program. If not, use 0 for both to start with.– First data point is typically scaled by 1 or 0.5, depending on the pulseprogram– Direct dimension’s 1st order phase is rarely more than 50 degrees. 0th order can

be anywhere from 0 to 360 degrees– Phase in the 2D mode for best appearance

• Referencing– Can be done by picking a known resonance in the spectrum– by (external) protons

Page 52: NMR Training 2009

INEPT

HSQC: a Block Diagram

acq

dec

H

X

J

t1/2 t1/2

• Magnetization transfer pathway:F1(H) -> F2(X) -> F2(X,t1) -> F1(H) -> F1(H,t2)

90 180

180 90

States: =x and =y are acquired for same t1 and treated as a complex pair in Fourier transform. No need to change receiver phase

TPPI: =x, y, -x and –y are acquired sequentially in t1, and receiver phase is incremented too. Real Fourier transform.

J J J

Page 53: NMR Training 2009

HMQC or HSQC

Magnitude HMQC (9 mins)Easy set up and slightly higher sensitivity

Phase sensitive HSQC (18 mins)Better resolution

adapted from acornnmr.com

codeine

Page 54: NMR Training 2009

HMQC and HSQC comparison

• HMQC– Fewer pulses– More tolerant to pulse

mis-calibrations

– Allows homonuclear (proton) coupling in the indirect dimension

• HSQC– More pulses– Less tolerant to pulse

mis-calibrations

– No homonuclear (proton) coupling in the indirect dimension

Page 55: NMR Training 2009

Data Presentation

• Processed data can be readily viewed, manipulated and printed by xwinplot (wysiwyg)

• Xwinplot can readily output .png, .jpg or .pdf files for publications or presentations

• Files can be transferred through secure ftp

Page 56: NMR Training 2009

Pulse sequence:the heart and soul of NMR

;zggpwg;this is a bruker sequenceprosol relations=<triple>#include <Avance.incl>#include <Grad.incl>"d12=20u"1 ze2 30m d1 10u pl1:f1 p1 ph1 50u UNBLKGRAD p16:gp1 d16 pl0:f1 (p11:sp1 ph2:r):f1 4u d12 pl1:f1 (p2 ph3) 4u d12 pl0:f1 (p11:sp1 ph2:r):f1 46u p16:gp1 d16 4u BLKGRAD go=2 ph31 30m mc #0 to 2 F0(zd)exitph1=0 2ph2=0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 ph3=2 2 3 3 0 0 1 1ph31=0 2 2 0;comments for parameters…

Delay

define f1 power level

Phases

90° pulse on f1

Gradient pulse

Shaped 90° pulse

Acq. and go to label 2

1H

G

90x

90-x180x

90-x

On-res: dephased by two gradientsOff-res: refocused by two gradients

Write to disc. And go to label 2

Delay only; be very careful with critical command in a

labeled line label

Page 57: NMR Training 2009

Where Things are: Bruker File Structure

• User NMR data /u/data/username/nmr• Pulse programs /u/exp/stan/nmr/lists/pp • Gradient programs /u/exp/stan/nmr/lists/gp• Shaped pulses

/u/exp/stan/nmr/lists/wave• decoupling /u/exp/stan/nmr/lists/cpd• Frequency(f1) lists /u/exp/stan/nmr/lists/f1• Parameter sets /u/exp/stan/nmr/par• Shim sets /u/exp/stan/nmr/lists/bsms• Macros /u/exp/stan/nmr/mac

Page 58: NMR Training 2009

Gradients

• Homospoil gradients– Size of duration may not matter much– Stronger ones tend to clean up unwanted

magnetization better

• Gradient echoes:– Exact ratios between multiple gradients must

follow– Diffusion loss must be considered for small

molecules, especially during long echoes• Log of signal size is proportional to -2g22D

Page 59: NMR Training 2009

Simulations

• Can be easily performed for pulses, spin-systems or pulse sequences

• Save experimental time

• Enhance our understanding of NMR

• Most frequently used for shaped pulses

Page 60: NMR Training 2009

Shaped Pulse: What and Why

• What– Narrow sense: amplitude modulation only, while

phase is constant– Broad sense: amplitude and phase modulation

• Why– To achieve perturbation over a certain frequency

range (uniform and selective)• Narrow bandwidth: shaped pulse. e.g. Gaussian• Wide bandwidth: adiabatic pulse

Page 61: NMR Training 2009

How is Shaped Pulse Different• Composite pulse is typically a block of square pulses with constant

phases– Pulse integration does not correlate with pulse angle– Pulse calibration come from individual component

• Adiabatic pulse sweeps frequency (phase has strong time dependence)– Pulse integration does not correlate with pulse angle– Pulse calibration depends on sweep range, and somewhat on

adiabaticity too

• Simple shaped pulse can be calibrated by integration– Caveat: a 180° pulse is not necessarily twice of a 90° pulse– Some shaped pulses are good for 180° inversions (z -> -z) while others

are good for 90° excitations (z -> x/y)

Page 62: NMR Training 2009

Shaped Pulse Examples

• Square pulse: simplest shaped pulse; good for simple hard excitation

• Gaussian and Sinc: good selectivity; for proton

• Gaussian cascade: G4, G3, Q5 and Q3; for carbon– G4 for excitation– G3 for inversion – Q5 for 90°– Q3 for 180°

Gauss

Sinc1

G4

G4: four Gaussian lobes

Page 63: NMR Training 2009

Choosing Shaped Pulses• Define the goal

– excitation, inversion or refocusing– length or power level

• Rule of thumb: bandwidth is ~ 1/P360 or RF strength (for square pulses)– shape

• Power requirement– peak power may not exceed certain level

• Length requirement– Be aware of probe limit on length in case of high power– While longer pulses tend to have better selectivity, relaxation / scalar coupling

may limit pulse length

• Run pulse simulation and calculation– Bandwidth needs to be first satisfied– Simulated frequency profile is to have top-hat behavior– Phase needs to be linear in the region of interest

Page 64: NMR Training 2009

Shaped Pulse Calculation

• Rule of thumb:

– 6db change in power results two fold change in pulse length

dB = 20 log (P90/P90ref)

– e.g. 10us @0db => 20us @6db for the sample pulse angle

• For a shaped pulse with a imperfect linear amplifier,

dB = 20 log (P90*shape_integ/P90hard*comp_ratio)

Modern spectrometers have comp_ratio close to 1

• Adiabatic pulses require different treatments

Page 65: NMR Training 2009

Example: Setting up a Sinc Pulse

• Within xwinnmr, launch shape tool by typing “stdisp” or from menu

• Within shape tool, choose shapes -> sinc. Change lobe number to 1 and click “OK”

• On the left is the amplitude profile (sinc shape) and (constant) phase is shown on the right

1 means one sinc lobe

Page 66: NMR Training 2009

Example: a Sinc Pulse (cont’d)

• Within shape tool, choose analyze -> integrate pulse. Make necessary updates. In this particular case, we assume the reference is 9.5 us @1.5db and you wish to calculate for 1000us 90 degree pulse. Then click OK

• The power level is calculated as 35.8db compared with the reference. Click “seen”

• If satisfied, you can save this shaped pulse under /u/exp/nmr/stan/lists/wave/.

• Go back to xwinnmr->ased, and update the sinc1 shaped pulse as pulse length of 1ms, and power level to be 35.8 + 1.5 (since reference 9.5us is @ 1.5db) = 37.3db

• If needed, the shaped pulse power can be fine tuned by gs, or a careful calibration

Page 67: NMR Training 2009

Pulse Simulation

• Within shape tool, choose analyze -> simulate. Update the length as 1000us and rotation angle as 90 (for sinc1 we just set up). Click “OK”.

• A new Bloch module will show default (x,y) profile for excitation. Click on z to view z profile.

z

Page 68: NMR Training 2009

Pulse Simulation (cont’d)

• If you decide that the starting magnetization is x, you can click (in Bloch module) “calculate”->”excitation profile”. Change initial Mx to 1 and Mz to 0. Click “OK” and then the excitation profile will be updated.

• If you wish to examine trajectory (how a magnetization at a given frequency responds to the sinc1 pulse), you can click “time evolution”, and update initial values etc (may not allow too many steps). Click “OK”.

Page 69: NMR Training 2009

Demo

• Sample preparation; Shigemi tube• Lock and shim• Tune and match• Calibration of 90° pulse• Water suppression• Calculation / simulation of pulses• Set up 1D and 2D’s: mutizg; COSY and HSQC• Data processing: addition and subtraction• Data presentation: xwinplot

Page 70: NMR Training 2009

Backup slides

Page 71: NMR Training 2009

Safety• Personal safety

– Cryogens: do not lean on or push magnets– Cryoprobes: avoid contact with transfer line– Magnetic and RF hazards

• Instrument safety– Know the limits of instruments and be conservative– Probe limits: avoid excessive long decoupling, hard pulses or their equivalents– Double check pulse program and parameters for any non-standard new

experiment. Pay special attention to power switch statements in the pulseprogram

• Data Safety– Back up data promptly and regularly– Data processing or manipulation has no impact on the raw (FID) data– Do not change parameters after data are acquired

Page 72: NMR Training 2009

Xwinnmr: Spectra addition/subtraction

• Operations on processed data (spectra) have no impact on raw data

• edc2: define 2nd dataset (to be compared) and 3rd dataset (to save results into)

• dual: allow comparison