Anil Kumar 1 , K. Rama Koteswara Rao 1 , T.S. Mahesh 2 and V.S.Manu 1
NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek...
-
Upload
russell-hamilton -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek...
![Page 1: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality
V. Athalye2, H. Katiyar1, Soumya S. Roy1, Abhishek Shukla1, R. Koteswara Rao3
T. S. Mahesh1
1IISER-Pune, 2Cummins College, Pune,
3IISc, Bangalore
Acknowledgements:
Usha Devi1, K. Rajagopal2, Anil Kumar3, and G. C. Knee4
1 Bangalore University,2 HRI & Inspire Inst., Virginia, USA,
3 IISc, Bangalore4 University of Oxford
![Page 2: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Plan
• NMR as a quantum testbed
• Correlation Leggett-Garg Inequality
• Entropic Leggett-Garg Inequality
• Summary
Athalye, Roy, TSM, PRL 2011.
Hemant, Abhishek, Koteswar, TSM,arXiv: 1210.1970 [quant-ph]
![Page 3: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ħgB0
Many nuclei have ‘spin angular momentum’ and ‘magnetic moment’
Coherent Superposition
a|0 + b |1 |0 |1
B0
Nuclear Spins
![Page 4: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Spectrometer Sample:1015 spins
RF coilPulse/Detect
Superconductingcoil
H0
H1cos(wt)
~
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
![Page 5: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1015 spins
Pseudopure State
p1
p0
= 1
~ 105 at 300 K, 12 T
E
kT =
B0 |0
|1 p1
p0
![Page 6: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1015 spins
Pseudopure State
p1
p0
= 1
~ 105 at 300 K, 12 T
E
kT =
B0 |0
|1 p1
p0
pseudopure
=(1- )1/2+|00|
![Page 7: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1015 spins
Pseudopure State
p1
p0
= 1
~ 105 at 300 K, 12 T
E
kT =
B0 |0
|1 p1
p0
RF
pseudopure
=(1- )1/2+|++| =(1- )1/2+|00|
![Page 8: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2-qubit register
=(1- )1/2+|00|
> 1/3
UW
NonseparableState
Resources
SeparableState
1/3
UW
• parahydrogens (Jones &Anwar, PRA 2004)
• q-transducer (Cory et al, PRA 2007)
Resource:Entanglement
Resource:Discord(in units of 2)
Hemant, Roy, TSM, A. Patel, PRA2012
• pseudopure states
• Cory 1997• Chuang 1997
• ~ pure states
![Page 9: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
7-qubit NMR register
NMR systems useful?Pseudopure|0000000
Preparation
(scalability?)
Shor’salgorithm
15 = 3 x 5Chuang, Nature 2002
No entanglementfinite discord
Open question:
Is discord sufficient resource for quantum computation ?
![Page 10: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
NMR system as a quantum testbed• Geometric Phases (Suter, 1988)
• Electromagnetically Induced Transparency (Murali, 2004)
• Contextuality (Laflamme, 2010)
• Delayed choice (Roy, 2012)
• Born’s rule (Laflamme, 2012)
•
•
•
Why NMR?
• Long life-times of quantum coherence
• Unmatched control on spin dynamics
![Page 11: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Correlation LGI(CLGI)
![Page 12: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Macrorealism“A macroscopic object, which has available to it two or more macroscopically distinct states, is at any given time in a definite one of those states.”
Non-invasive measurability“It is possible in principle to determine which of these states the system is in without any effect on the state itself or on the subsequent system dynamics.”
A. J. Leggett and A. Garg, PRL 54, 857 (1985)
Leggett-Garg (1985) Sir Anthony James LeggettUni. of Illinois at UC
Prof. Anupam GargNorthwestern University, Chicago
How to distinguishQuantum behaviorFrom Classical ?
![Page 13: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• N. Lambert et al, PRB 2001
• J.-S. Xu et al., Sci. Rep 2011
• Palacios-Laloy et al., Nature Phys. 2010
• M. E. Goggin et al., PNAS USA 2011
• J. Dressel et al., PRL 2011
• M. Souza et al, NJP 2011
• Roy et al, PRL 2011
• G. C. Knee et al., Nat. Commun. 2012
• C. Emary et al, PRB 2012
• Y. Suzuki et al, NJP 2012
• Hemant et al, arXiv 2012
LGI studies in various systems
![Page 14: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Consider a system with a dynamic dichotomic observable Q(t)
Dichotomic : Q(t) = 1 at any given time
timeQ1 Q2 Q3
t2 t3 . . .
. . .
Leggett-Garg (1985)
A. J. Leggett and A. Garg, PRL 54, 857 (1985)
PhD Thesis, Johannes Kofler, 2004
t1
![Page 15: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
timeQ1
t = 0
Q2 Q3
t . . .
. . .
2t
Two-Time Correlation Coefficient (TTCC)
EnsembleTime ensemble (sequential)
Spatial ensemble (parallel)
Temporal correlation: Cij = Qi Qj = Qi(r)
Qj(r)N
1
r = 1
N
1 Cij 1 Cij = 1 Perfectly correlated
Cij =1 Perfectly anti-correlated
Cij = 0 No correlation
= pij+(+1) + pij
(1)
r over an ensemble
![Page 16: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
LG string with 3 measurements
K3 = C12 + C23 C13
K3 = Q1Q2 + Q2Q3 Q1Q3
3 K3 1
Leggett-Garg Inequality (LGI)
K3
time
Macrorealism(classical)
timeQ1
t = 0
Q2 Q3
t 2t
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1Q2+Q2Q3-Q1Q3
1 1 1 11 1 -1 11 -1 1 -31 -1 -1 1-1 1 1 1-1 1 -1 -3-1 -1 1 1-1 -1 -1 1
![Page 17: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
TTCC of a spin ½ particle
TimeQ1
t = 0
Q2 Q3
t 2t
Consider :
A spin ½ particle
Hamiltonian : H = ½ z
Maximally mixed initial State : 0 = ½ 1
Dynamic observable: x eigenvalues 1 (Dichotomic )
C12 = x(0)x(t) = x e-iHt x eiHt
= x [xcos(t) + ysin(t)]
C12 = cos(t)
Similarly, C23 = cos(t)
and C13 = cos(2t)PhD Thesis, Johannes Kofler, 2004
![Page 18: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Quantum States Violate LGI: K3 with Spin ½
timeQ1
t = 0
Q2 Q3
t 2t
K3 = C12 + C23 C13 = 2cos(t) cos(2t)
K3
t2 3
Macrorealism(classical)
Quantum !!
40
No violation !
(/3,1.5)
Maxima (1.5) @cos(t) =1/2
![Page 19: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
K4 = C12 + C23 + C34 C14 = 3cos(t) cos(3t)
Quantum States Violate LGI: K4 with Spin ½
Extrema (22) @cos(2t) =0
K4 Macrorealism(classical)
Quantum !!
t2 3 40
(/4,22)
(3/4,22)
time
Q1
t = 0
Q2 Q3
t 2t 3t
Q4
![Page 20: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Evaluating K3
K3 = C12 + C23 C13
t = 0 t 2t
x
↗
x
↗
x
↗
x
↗
x
↗
x
↗
time
ENSEMBLE x(0)x(t) = C12
x(t)x(2t) = C23
x(0)x(2t) = C13
ENSEMBLE
ENSEMBLE
0
Hamiltonian : H = ½ z
0
0
![Page 21: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Evaluating K4
K4 = C12 + C23 + C34 C14
t = 0 t 2t
x
↗
x
↗
x
↗
x
↗
x
↗
time
x
↗x
↗
x
↗
3t
ENSEMBLE x(0)x(t) = C12
x(t)x(2t) = C23
x(0)x(3t) = C14
x(2t)x(3t) = C34
Joint Expectation Value
ENSEMBLE
ENSEMBLE
ENSEMBLE
Hamiltonian : H = ½ z
0
0
0
0
![Page 22: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Moussa Protocol
O. Moussa et al, PRL,104, 160501 (2010)
Target qubit (T)
Probe qubit (P)
A B
x
↗|+
AB
Joint Expectation Value
A↗
B↗
ABTarget qubit (T)
Dichotomicobservables
![Page 23: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Sample13CHCl3
(in DMSO)
Target: 13C Probe: 1H
Resonance Offset: 100 Hz 0 Hz
T1 (IR) 5.5 s 4.1 s
T2 (CPMG) 0.8 s 4.0 s
V. Athalye, S. S. Roy, and TSM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 130402 (2011).
![Page 24: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Experiment – pulse sequence
1H
13C
= Ax Aref
Ax(t)+i Ay(t)
Ax(t) = cos(2tij) Ay(t) = sin(2tij)
Ax(t) x(t)
=
0
V. Athalye, S. S. Roy, and TSM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 130402 (2011).
1/2
90x
PFG
![Page 25: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
t
Experiment – Evaluating K3
timeQ1
t = 0
Q2 Q3
t 2t
K3 = C12 + C23 C13
= 2cos(t) cos(2t)
( = 2100)
Error estimate: 0.05
V. Athalye, S. S. Roy, and TSM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 130402 (2011).
![Page 26: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Experiment – Evaluating K3
50 100 150 200 250 300 t (ms)
LGI violated !!(Quantum)
LGI satisfied
Decay constant of K3 = 288 ms
165 ms
V. Athalye, S. S. Roy, and TSM,Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 130402 (2011).
![Page 27: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
t
Experiment – Evaluating K4
( = 2100)
Error estimate: 0.05
K4 = C12 + C23 + C34 C14
= 3cos(t) cos(3t)
time
Q1
t = 0
Q2 Q3
t 2t 3t
Q4
Decay constant of K4 = 324 ms
V. Athalye, S. S. Roy, and TSM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 130402 (2011).
![Page 28: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Entropic LGI(ELGI)
A. R. Usha Devi, H. S. Karthik, Sudha, and A. K. Rajagopal,arXiv: 1208.4491 [quant-ph]
![Page 29: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
timeQ1 Q2 Q3
t2 t3 . . .
. . .
t1
System
A. R. Usha Devi et al,arXiv: 1208.4491 [quant-ph]
System state: 1/2
Dynamical observable : Sz(t) = Ut Sz Ut†
Time Evolution: Ut = exp(iSxt)
![Page 30: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Information Deficit:
timeQ1 Q2 Q3
t2 t3 . . .
. . .
t1
ELGI bound
A. R. Usha Devi et al,arXiv: 1208.4491 [quant-ph]
![Page 31: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Extracting Probabilities
Single-event: time
Qk
. . .
. . .
tk
For S = 1/2
P(0) = ½P(1) = ½
Hemant, Abhishek, Koteswar, TSM, arXiv: 1210.1970 [quant-ph]
k
![Page 32: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Extracting Probabilitiestime
Qj
. . .
. . .
tjti
QiTwo-time joint:
Invasivej
![Page 33: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Extracting Probabilitiestime
Qj
. . .
. . .
tjti
QiTwo-time joint:
![Page 34: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Extracting Probabilitiestime
Qj
. . .
. . .
tjti
QiTwo-time joint:
P(0,qj) P(1,qj)
Non-Invasive Measurement (NIM)
![Page 35: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
System
Two-time joint probability
CH
system
ancilla
Hemant, Abhishek, Koteswar, TSM, arXiv: 1210.1970 [quant-ph]
![Page 36: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Two-time joint probabilities
P(q1,q2) P(q1,q3)
time
Q1 Q2 Q3
t2 t3t1
Hemant, Abhishek, Koteswar, TSM, arXiv: 1210.1970 [quant-ph]
![Page 37: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Information Deficit
CNOT
Hemant, Abhishek, Koteswar, TSM,arXiv: 1210.1970 [quant-ph]
![Page 38: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Information Deficit
CNOT
AntiCNOT
Hemant, Abhishek, Koteswar, TSM,arXiv: 1210.1970 [quant-ph]
![Page 39: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Information Deficit
CNOT
AntiCNOT
NIM
Hemant, Abhishek, Koteswar, TSM,arXiv: 1210.1970 [quant-ph]
![Page 40: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Legitimate Grand Probability A. R. Usha Devi et al,arXiv: 1208.4491 [quant-ph]
Classical Probability Theory:
P’(q1,q2) = P(q1,q2,q3)q3
P’(q1,q3) = P(q1,q2,q3)q2
P’(q2,q3) = P(q1,q2,q3)q1
P(q1,q2)
P(q1,q3)
P(q2,q3)
Marginals Grand
time
Q1 Q2 Q3
t2 t3t1
![Page 41: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Extracting Grand Probability
Three-time joint:
Hemant, Abhishek, Koteswar, TSM,arXiv: 1210.1970 [quant-ph]
![Page 42: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Illegitimate Joint Probability
P(q1,q2,q3)is illegitimate !!
Violation ofEntropic LGI
Hemant, Abhishek, Koteswar, TSM,arXiv: 1210.1970 [quant-ph]
![Page 43: NMR investigations of Leggett-Garg Inequality V. Athalye 2, H. Katiyar 1, Soumya S. Roy 1, Abhishek Shukla 1, R. Koteswara Rao 3 T. S. Mahesh 1 1 IISER-Pune,](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032523/56649d925503460f94a78a11/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Summary• NMR spin-system violated correlation LGI for short time scales
indicating the quantumness of the system.
• The gradual decoherence lead to the ultimate satisfaction of
correlation LGI.
• NMR spins systems also violated entropic LGI in the expected
time interval
• The experimental grand probability P(q1,q2,q3) could not generate
the experimental marginal probability P(q1,q3) supporting the
theoretical prediction.
Thank You !!