NM USER FORUM 2014 Razvan BUCUROIU Head of Operations Planning 30/01/2014 Free Route and Airspace...

NM USER FORUM 2014

Razvan BUCUROIUHead of Operations Planning

30/01/2014

Free Route and Airspace Improvements

2

Progress on flight efficiency achievements

Airspace Design – excellent progress – on a good track to achieve 2014 RP1 target Airspace utilisation aspects – decreasing trend, but far from target

Flight planning Enhancements to the RAD, time applicability of the RAD Enhanced utilisation of CDRs Capacity impacts – industrial actions, system failures (0.03-0.04 percentage points lost)

Flight efficiency evolution

Target 2013: +2.85% Target 2013: +4.4%

RTE-DES

3.53% 3.54% 3.45% 3.22% 3.04% 2.96% 2.80%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

RTE-FPL

4.91% 5.03% 4.90% 4.91% 4.73% 4.64% 4.57%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

3

Progress on flight efficiency achievements Flight efficiency evolution 2013

Route Efficiency KPI per AIRAC cycle

20

12

20

10

20

10

20

11

20

13

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%

1001

1002

1003

1004

1005

1006

1007

1008

1009

1010

1011

1012

1013

1101

1102

1103

1104

1105

1106

1107

1108

1109

1110

1111

1112

1113

1201

1202

1203

1204

1205

1206

1207

1208

1209

1210

1211

1212

1213

1301

1302

1303

1304

1305

1306

1307

1308

1309

1310

1311

1312

1313

AIRAC

Ro

ute

Ext

ensi

on

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

RTE-DES

RTE-FPL

4


RTE-FPL

4.91% 5.03% 4.90% 4.91% 4.73% 4.64% 4.57%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

There is a potential of up to 0.6 percentage points improvement through better flight planning

RP1 Focus on NM Flight Efficiency Initiative

Current situationLast filed FPL

Current network potential

RTE-CDR

4.23% 4.34%

5.06%

4.19% 4.08% 4.04% 3.96%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

5

Second Reference Period 2019 European Targets

•Actual trajectory (KEA)average 2.6% route extension

decreasing from 3.17% in 2012

•Last filed flight plan trajectory (KEP)average 4.1% route extension decreasing from

5.15% in 2012

6

Second Reference Period 2019 NM Targets

•Route extension - airspace design - DESimprovement of the DES indicator

by 0.57 between 2012 and 2019

•NM direct contributions to flight efficiency savingsFE direct savings will amount to

- 10% (2015-2016) - 5% (2017-2019)

•Increase the CDR1/2 usage Increase CDR availability and

usage by 5% between 2012 and 2019

7

ERNIP - ARN Version 2014-2018/19Airspace Vision for RP2

•Comprehensive cross-border implementation of Free Route Airspace in Europe• at least above FL310, in the European airspace•RP1 target expected to be met•Cross border FRA in FABs included in most FABs roadmaps

•Optimised route structure below FL310• ensuring efficient connectivity in/out terminal airspace• supporting PBN implementation

•Simplification of RAD•Very limited RAD in SE and Northern Europe•Moving towards a European RAD

•Harmonised airspace publications;

•More efficient Flexible Use of Airspace procedures and system support

•Closer cooperation NM - airspace users - computer flight plan service providers

8

Implementing the VisionEuropean ATS Route Network

Improvement Plan 2014-2018/19

Route Efficiency KPI per AIRAC cycle

20

12

20

10

20

08

20

13

20

07

20

09

20

11

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

713

801

802

803

804

805

806

807

808

809

810

811

812

813

901

902

903

904

905

906

907

908

909

910

911

912

913

1001

1002

1003

1004

1005

1006

1007

1008

1009

1010

1011

1012

1013

1101

1102

1103

1104

1105

1106

1107

1108

1109

1110

1111

1112

1113

1201

1202

1203

1204

1205

1206

1207

1208

1209

1210

1211

1212

1213

1301

1302

1303

1304

1305

1306

1307

1308

1309

1310

1311

AIRAC

Ro

ute

Ext

ensi

on

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

RTE-DES

3.65% Jan 2008

3.40% Sept 2009

3.13% Sept 2010

3.05% Sept 2011 2.95%

Sept 2012

approx. 2.35%

end 2019

2.69% Nov 2013

•450 Airspace Improvement Packages

•80 FRA projects

•50 AO airspace packages

•100 Network Manager packages

9

Implementing the VisionFree Route Implementation

10


11


12


13

Implementing the VisionSectorisation

Traffic Demand Variation 2013 vs 2008 4 Weekdays of Traffic

> 80 Ac/day60 to 80 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day20 to 40 Ac/day10 to 20 Ac/day

Incr

De

cr

20 to 40 Ac/day40 to 60 Ac/day> 60 Ac/day

10 to 20 Ac/day

Cell size is 20nm x 20nm

Week 25 2013<>2008Traffic Demand Variation 2013 vs 2008 4 Weekdays of Traffic


Incr

De

cr


10 to 20 Ac/day


Week 25 2013<>20084 Weekdays of Traffic


Incr

De

cr


10 to 20 Ac/day

4 Weekdays of Traffic


Incr

De

cr


10 to 20 Ac/day


Week 25 2013<>2008

14


Traffic Density Comparison Week <> Weekend


8 Days of Traffic

WE Week

WE <> Week in June 2013Traffic Density Comparison Week <> Weekend


8 Days of Traffic

WE Week

WE <> Week in June 2013


8 Days of Traffic

WE Week



8 Days of Traffic

WE Week


15


Flight Level Distribution in ECAC

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Flight Levels

Per

cen

tag

e (

%)

Week 25 - June 2008

Week 25 - June 2013

16

Implementing the VisionCity Pairs

17

Implementing the VisionASM solutions

18

Implementing the VisionRAD Restrictions

•Elimination of further restrictions impacting 15 ANSPs

•Creation of FAB Annexes

•Creation of Network RAD

•Time applicability of the RAD

•No impact on safety and capacity

19

Implementing the VisionTMA Evolutions

•Paris TMA •Barcelona TMA•Baku TMA•Batumi TMA•Beograd TMA•Canarias TMA•Kutaisi TMA•Ljubljana TMA•London TMA (London Airspace Management Program/ LAMP)•Madrid TMA•Milano TMA•Northern Terminal Control Area/ NTCA of Prestwick ACC •Oslo TMA (HOPE - Harmonisation of Oslo Procedures and Environment)•Roma TMA•Vienna TMA

20

•Close cooperation with the airspace users•Coordination started with some individual airlines

•Shortly will be able to provide support to any airline•Ensuring closer coordination on evolutions with the CFPSPs•At network and local level

•Strategic identification of enhanced flight planning options

•Pre-tactical-Tactical-Post Ops•Deploying flight efficiency actions in the NMOC•More effective utilisation of CDRs – ASM solutions•Direct support to AOs

•More awareness at AOs Users Groups

•NM User Forum

Focus on NM Flight Efficiency Initiative

21


AIRAC RTE-DES RTE-RAD RTE-CDR RTE-FPL RTE-ATC1308 - Thomas Cook 2.20% 2.82% 2.97% 3.72% 2.94%

1308 - Network 2.78% 3.60% 3.92% 4.48% 3.24%

RP1 Focus on NM Flight Efficiency Initiative

22

Increase airspace availability in SE EuropeAvailability of KFOR Sector as from 3 April 2014

NM USER FORUM 2014 Razvan BUCUROIU Head of Operations Planning 30/01/2014 Free Route and Airspace...

Documents

Transcript of NM USER FORUM 2014 Razvan BUCUROIU Head of Operations Planning 30/01/2014 Free Route and Airspace...