Nigel Clarke Department of Chemistry Durham University Effect of Shear Flow on Polymer-Polymer...
-
Upload
emery-ethelbert-banks -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of Nigel Clarke Department of Chemistry Durham University Effect of Shear Flow on Polymer-Polymer...
Nigel ClarkeDepartment of ChemistryDurham University
Effect of Shear Flow on Polymer-Polymer Miscibility: Theoretical Advances and Challenges
With thanks to: Gavin Buxton, Hervé Gerard,
Julia Higgins, Tom McLeish, Dmitri Miroshnychenko
Overview
• Does flow increase or decrease stability in polymer blends?
– Coupling phase separation dynamics and stress relaxation in entangled blends
• Scattering – a quantitative test of theory– can we describe concentration fluctuations under
shear?
Towards a Theoretical Description
• Fluctuations in concentration– fluctuation in stress if viscosities
are different
• Thermodynamic– shear stresses and normal
forces directly affect free energy
• Dynamic– stresses affect dynamics of
concentration fluctuations
regions of high stress
regions of low stress
blue >> green
Stress relaxation in polymer blends
• Constraint release– stress relaxed more rapidly if
surrounded by short polymers– dynamics depends on
concentration– well defined concentration
dependence of stresses …
2 1 2 2
1
4 (1 )( ) A Bxy A A A A A A B B B B
A B
G G G G
N
relaxation times in fixed tubes
convection
Equation of motion
Coupling between
• concentration fluctuations
• Stress fluctuations
AA A BM
t
v σ
thermodynamics
stressgradients
Doi and Onuki J. Phys. II, 1990, vol. 2, 1631
Concentrations fluctuations and the diffusion coefficient
One phase region– fluctuations decay: D > 0
Two phase region– fluctuations grow: D < 0
Phase boundary – defined by: D (q 0) = 0
s
D
0
+ve
-ve
Increasingly unfavourable interactions
0( ) ( ) exp A At t Dt
Linear stability analysis
• Neglect the dynamics of stress evolution
• Deff < 0 growth of
fluctuations
• Define stability by Deff = 0
– stability only affected for non-zero Normal forces
0 eff( ) ( ) exp A At t D t
Deff depends on• intrinsic dynamics• thermodynamics • stress variation
with composition
Fluctuations: Polymer Solutions A. Onuki, S.T. Milner
Fluctuations in the z direction are suppressed
shear induced mixing
Fluctuations in the y direction are enhanced
shear induced de-mixing
direction of shear
x
yz
Why strong directional dependence?
• Stress balance– flow gradient direction
• shear stress constant• shear rate must vary
with composition
– vorticity direction• shear stress can vary• shear rate constant
• N1 increases as 2
– opposes fluctuations in z direction
– in y direction shear rate variations dominate and favour fluctuations
Fluctuations: Blends
Fluctuations in the z direction are suppressed or enhanced
shear induced mixing or
demixing
Fluctuations in the y direction are enhanced or suppressed
shear induced de-mixing or
mixing
direction of shear
x
yz
Temperature effects: closed-loops
• Generally A/B has a complex dependence on temperature– due to glass transition
temperature differences between components T
em
per
atu
re
No shear
5s-1
EVA
polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate / solution chlorinated
polyethylene
Beyond stability analysis
• Scattering as a more demanding test of theory
• scattering patterns can be measured in a steady state
• Significant advances in our understanding of the dynamics of miscible polymer blends in the past 10 years
• near quantitative constitutive equations that include concentration dependence of friction coefficients
Arbitrary stress relaxation function for blend
Prediction of steady state scattering
Blend rheology data
Improved theory
Predictive tools for phase transitions and microstructure evolution
Summary• In polymer blends
– possible to induce mixing or de-mixing in both the shear gradient and the vorticity directions
– quantitative description elusive
• Scattering patterns– Polymer solutions
• e.g., qualitative agreement with experimental results (Hashimoto et al) for oscillatory shear
– Miscible polymer blends with viscosity difference
• a quantitative test of stress gradient contributions to stability
?