Matthew Cote, Lance Bosart, and Daniel Keyser State University of New York, Albany, NY
Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
-
Upload
nelle-atkinson -
Category
Documents
-
view
39 -
download
5
description
Transcript of Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
![Page 1: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Synoptic and Mesoscale Conditions associated with Persisting and
Dissipating Mesoscale Convective Systems that Cross Lake Michigan
Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart
Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, NY 12222
E-mail: [email protected]
Support provided by the NSF ATM–0646907
12th Northeast Regional Operational Workshop
Albany, NY
3 November 2010
![Page 2: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation
Johns and Hirt (1987) Augustine and Howard (1991)
• Great Lakes region is an area of frequent MCS (MCC and derecho) activity– Important to understand MCS behavior upon crossing the Great Lakes
Frequency of Derechos MCC Occurrences
1986
![Page 3: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
NOWrad Areal Coverage ≥45 dBZ
I II IIIIII
0
![Page 4: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
NOWrad Areal Coverage ≥45 dBZ
0
![Page 5: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background
Graham et al. (2004)
68%24%
8%
![Page 6: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Purpose
• Present a climatological overview of MCSs that encountered Lake Michigan
• Examine composite analyses of MCS environments associated with persisting and dissipating MCSs
• Describe two MCSs, one that persisted and one that dissipated while crossing Lake Michigan, and place them into context of the climatology and composites
![Page 7: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MCS Selection Criteria
• Warm Season (Apr–Sep)• 2002–2007
• MCSs in the study:– are ≥(100 50 km) on NOWrad composite reflectivity
imagery– contain a continuous region ≥100 km of 45 dBZ echoes – meet the above two criteria for >3 h prior to crossing
Lake Michigan
100 km
50 km
![Page 8: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Climatology of MCSs
• MCSs persisted upon crossing Lake Michigan if they:– continued to meet the two aforementioned reflectivity criteria
– produced at least one severe report
n=110
![Page 9: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3.0°C 4.4°C 10.8°C 18.9°C 21.6°C 19.1°C
Monthly Climatological Distributionsn=110
LM LWT Climo
![Page 10: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Hourly Climatological Distributionsn=110
![Page 11: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Synoptic-Scale Composites
• Constructed using 0000, 0600, 1200, 1800 UTC 1.0° GFS analyses
• Time chosen closest to intersection with Lake Michigan– If directly between two analysis times, earlier time
chosen
• Composited on MCS centroid and moved to the average position
![Page 12: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Dynamic Persist vs. Dissipate
Persist Dissipate
200-hPa Heights (dam), 200-hPa Winds (m s-1), 850-hPa Winds (m s-1)
n=17 n=31m s−1
m s−1
200-hPa
850-hPa
![Page 13: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Dynamic Persist vs. DissipateCAPE (J kg-1), 0–6 km Shear (barbs; m s-1)
Persist Dissipate
n=17 n=31
J kg−1CAPE
![Page 14: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Differences Significant to 99.9th Percentile
850-hPa Wind Climatology
n=110
Source: NARR
![Page 15: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Downstream CAPE/Shear Climatology
n=54 Source: UAlbany sounding archive
CAPE Differences Significant to 95th Percentile
DTX
![Page 16: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
18 June 2010 - persist
24 June 2003 - dissipate
Case Studies – Bow Echoes
9 out of 13 bow echoes (69%) persisted compared with 47 out of 110 (43%) total MCSs in the climatology
![Page 17: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MCS
1800 UTC 18 June 10 - persist
Source: UAlbany Archive
1000 UTC 24 June 03 - dissipate
MCSSource: NOWrad
Composites
![Page 18: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Source: UAlbany Archive
MCS
MCS Source: NOWrad Composites
2000 UTC 18 June 10 - persist
1200 UTC 24 June 03 - dissipate
![Page 19: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Source: UAlbany Archive
MCS
MCSSource: NOWrad
Composites
2200 UTC 18 June 10 - persist
1400 UTC 24 June 03 - dissipate
![Page 20: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Source: UAlbany Archive
MCS
Source: NOWrad Composites
0000 UTC 18 June 10 - persist
1600 UTC 24 June 03 - dissipate
![Page 21: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
2000 UTC 18 June 10 - persist
SLP (hPa), Surface Temperature (C), and Surface Mixing Ratio (>18 g kg-1)
20
23
26
29
32
18
08
04
1216
cold pool boundary
![Page 22: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
1200 UTC 24 June 03 - dissipate
SLP (hPa), Surface Temperature (C), and Surface Mixing Ratio (>18 g kg-1)
20
18
08
12
1623
20
cold pool boundary
![Page 23: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
2200 UTC 18 June 10 - persist
Source: 20-km RUC
1400 UTC 24 June 03 - dissipate200-hPa Heights (dam), 200-hPa Winds (m s-1), 850-hPa Winds (barbs; m s-1)
![Page 24: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
CAPE (J kg-1), 0–6 km Shear (barbs; m s-1)
2200 UTC 18 June 10 - persist 1400 UTC 24 June 03 - dissipate
Source: 20-km RUC
![Page 25: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
cold pool cold pool
B
B’ B’
B’
B
B
B’
2000 UTC 2200 UTC
∆ (K), (K), Wind (m s-1)
600
700
800
900
B
975-hPa ∆ (K), 0–3-km Shear (m s-1)
2-h differences at 2200 UTC 18 June 10 - persist
![Page 26: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
B’
B
ACARS sounding at 2208 UTC 18 June 10 - persist
900 hPa
975-hPa ∆ (K), 0–3 km Shear (m s-1)
Descent sounding from Madison, WI
![Page 27: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
T, Td, p
°C
Rockford, Illinois meteogram - persist
Source: UAlbany Archive
975-hPa ∆ (K), 0–3 km Shear (m s-1)
hPa
![Page 28: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
°C Buoy 45007
T=2.9°C
Source: NDBC
Buoy meteogram - persist975-hPa ∆ (K), 0–3 km Shear (m s-1)
hPaTair, Twater, p
![Page 29: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Lake Interactions
LWA – South Haven
2130 Z 2200 Z
T, Td, p
![Page 30: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
2-h differences at 1300 UTC 23 June 03 - dissipate
cold pool cold pool
B
B’ B’
B’
B
B
B’
1100 UTC 1300 UTC
975-hPa ∆ (K), 0–3-km Shear (m s-1) ∆ (K), (K), Wind (m s-1)
600
700
800
900
B
12 Z - GRB
![Page 31: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
T, Td, p°C
Oshkosh, Wisconsin meteogram - dissipate
Source: UAlbany Archive
975-hPa ∆ (K), 0–3 km Shear (m s-1)
hPa
![Page 32: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
°C
Buoy 45007
T=3.4°C
Source: NDBC
Buoy meteogram - dissipate975-hPa ∆ (K), 0–3 km Shear (m s-1)
hPaTair, Twater, p
![Page 33: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Later Season
Differences Significant to 99th Percentile
Surface-Inversion Climatology
T5m - TSfc
n=97
Source: NDBC
![Page 34: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Conclusions – Climatology/Composite
• MCSs persisted 43% of the time (47 of 110 MCSs) upon crossing Lake Michigan during warm seasons of 2002–2007
• MCSs persisted during all months and hours but favored July and August and evening and overnight
• MCSs persisted with large downstream CAPE/shear and strong 850-hPa winds and near-surface lake inversions (non-bow echoes)
• MCSs persisted with a greater frequency as organizational structure increased
![Page 35: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Conclusions – Case Studies
• Compared with the MCS that dissipated, the MCS that persisted had:– a deeper, more robust convective cold pool– a near-surface lake inversion of ~equal strength– increased downstream CAPE/shear and a stronger 850-hPa low-
level jet stream
• In these case studies, (and with other bow echoes in the climatology), persistence/dissipation over Lake Michigan appears to be a function of environmental conditions and NOT interactions with Lake Michigan
![Page 36: Nicholas D. Metz and Lance F. Bosart Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135ed550346895d9d5f09/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Organizational Type
n=110
33.3% 45.7%
69.2%