NICHOLAS & BUTLER, LLPCraig M. Nicholas (SBN 178444)Tracy J. Jones (SBN 262632)

225 Broadway, 19th FloorSan Diego, California 92101Telephone: (619) 325-0492Facsimile: (619) 325-0496

Attorneys for DefendantThe Upper Deck Company, Inc. andRichard McWilliam

JOSEPH PIROZZI, and individual; J&THOBBY LLC,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

NORTH COUNTY DIVISION

13

14Plaintiffs,

vs.

THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, INC., aNevada Corporation; RICHARDMCWILLIAM, an individual; and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

FILED"P C !'n!dTY

'2012 OCT I I PM 12:21

CLES! 'LRfo tour iCCUFiTY. CA

CASE NO.: 37-2012-0005684 CU-BT-NC

REQUES9DICIAL NOTICE INSUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'DEMURRER TO THE COMPLAINT

Date: December21, 2012Time: 1:30 p.m.Dept.: N-31Judge: Hon. Timothy M. Casserly

Defendants.

N€B

TO PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Defendants The Upper Deck Company, Inc. and Richard McWilliam ("Defendants") will

and hereby do request that in conjunction with Defendants' Demurrer to Plaintiffs' Complaint, the

Court take judicial notice that: Plaintiffs have defaulted on the latest contract between

Plaintiffs and The Upper Deck Company, Inc.

The request is based upon California Evidence Code Sections 452 and 453, this

memorandum of points and authorities, the Declaration of Craig M. Nicholas ("Nicholas Dec."), the

pleadings and papers on file in this action, and upon such of the argument and evidence as may be

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINTAnCIK, YS A. LAW

SAn Dino

1

2

presented prior to or at the hearing of this matter.

Defendants lodge the following exhibits in support of this Request for Judicial Notice:

Exhibit A Complaint filed November 7, 2011, TheUpper Deck Company, Inc. v. J & T HobbyLLC et al., San Diego Superior Court CaseNo.. 37-2011-00100599-CU-B C-CTL

Exhibit B Request for Default Judgment filed August14, 2012 (requesting $1.5 million indamages), The Upper Deck Company, Inc.v. J& T Hobby LLC et al., San DiegoSuperior Court Case No. 37-2011-00100599-CU-BC-CTL

16

27

28N&B

AT+o..... AT WvSA. D,.nn

A court may take judicial notice of any facts and propositions that are not reasonably

subject to dispute and are capable of immediate and accurate determination by resort to sources of

reasonably indisputable accuracy. (Cal. Evid. Code § 452(h).) The court shall take judicial notice

of any matter set forth in Section 452 if a party requests it, gives each adverse party sufficient

notice of the request, and furnishes the court with sufficient information to enable it to take

judicial notice of the matter. (Cal. Evid. Code § 453.) Judicial notice should be taken of official

acts and records of legislative, executive, or judicial departments of federal or state government

(Cal. Evid. Code § 452(c); Arce v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 471,

484.)

Exhibits "A" and "B" are true and correct copies of court records filed in The Upper Deck

Company, Inc. v. J & T Hobby LLC et al., San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2011-

00100599-CU-BC-CTL . (Nicholas Dec., Ex. A, B, 112-3.) These records show that Upper Deck

filed a Complaint to recover for Plaintiffs' breach of contract and Upper Deck is in the final stages

of pursuing a default judgment against Plaintiffs for $1.5 million. (Id.) The documents support

Defendants' demurrer by negating Plaintiffs' allegation they substantially performed under the

contract, a necessary element of Plaintiffs' Fourth Cause of Action for breach of the covenant of

good faith and fair dealing. (Complaint, ¶ 38.) This fact is not reasonably subject to dispute given

the court records submitted by Defendants. Therefore, judicial notice is proper and this Court

2REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT

should take judicial notice that Plaintiffs have defaulted on the latest contract between

Plaintiffs and The Upper Deck Company, Inc.

NICHOLAS & BUTLER, LLP

Dated: October 11, 2012 By:

Attorneys for DefendantsThe Upper Deck Company, Inc. andRichard McWilliam

28N&B

ATT!,XPKY. AT LAWsee Dma,,

3REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT

EXHIBIT A

Sep.11. 2012 4:49PM MICHAEL WEISBERGa7Ur' BEL.It'Ca7

r. (GITACIIt..1d JUDICIAL)NOTtCt: TO DEFENDANT:(AI/ISO AL DEM$ANDADO):J&T Hobby; Joseph Pirozzi individually;DOES 1-100

YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF:(LO EST.4 DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE):The Upper Deck Company Inc.

and

No, 6402__P. 1: Uaa4ooFancOunr ussOkLY

(SOLO JAtA Lao be. LA conr$r

i , ar court` GPrkott.w "+"F

N^V :7 011

P,y: C. 50HAEM'j• Deputy

NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days, Read the Informationbelow.

You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copyserved on the plaintiff. A letter at phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be In proper legal form if you want tho court to hear yourcase. Thera may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California CourtsOnline Self-Help Center (xww.courVnlhca.gov/aeflie), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing tee, askthe court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property

Thaire are other legal requirements, You may want to call an attorney right away. if you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney•• referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, yod maybe eligible forfree legal soNkes from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate

the a1 Sui vfcas Web Sao pc , !Ile wrol life Onlin8SelHielpCq,,L,.(Uwvntooudlnfo.oa,goWselfhalp), or by oontacttrp your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory I(en forwalved fees andcosts on any sbttloment or arbitration award of $10,000 or more In g civil case. The court's lien must be paid before the court Will dismiss the case.$4VISOI to han demandedo. Sl ne rasp We denim do 30 dies, Is code puodo daddlr on so confa sin escudmr su version. Lea la 57famacOn acontinuaoibn.

mat 30 D/AS DECALENDARIO despuas do quo he enfraguen sate dtecl6nypapoles legates pare peasants, Una respuesta par ascrito an *sincome yhaeer qua se ant ague one copia at demandenle. Una cotta o una Hamade tekfdnica no to protegee. Su respuesta Poe eaalto Hone qua esteran fonnato legal refracto si desea qua proceisen so caso an fa carte. Es posible quo hays un fannutarlo qua usted pueda user pars so respuasta.Puede encantrarestos fpgnulados,de is codeaymds WNamaeitn one I Canto. d Ayuda,doIa5, Cartes do CallkrnIAj trtSUWda.(M,gpy),6lcii._.... _.biblataca do leyesde so condado b on la oorte quo Is quads We oerca, S1 no pueda pager to ovate do presontecldn, plda a!secretado do Is Cadequa to did on fonnulado do exancidn do pago do cooled. Si no presents so raspuesta a tlernpo, puade pero'er at caso parincumplimtento y in code topodd quilarso suaido, dnam y blonds sin ends advertencie.

Hey ofros requisites legatos. Es recomandeblo quo Ilame a un abagedo inmed/elamente. SI no conoce a un abogado, puade pamara on servido deramisl6n a abogadas. 51 no puade pagers on abogaob, as posibte quo cvmpla can foe requisites pen obtener servklos legates gratuthu dewprograms do servidos /so has ain tines de /rroa. Puedo encontrarestasgrWos ain fines de, hem an et sii* web do Combrnte Legal Sav/ees,(www.lewhelpcalifomfa.org), an el Centro de Ayuda de An Codes de California, (www.sucorfe.cagov) a ponlendoss on oontado cal la Corte o elcofegfa de abegadaslocales, AWSO: Parley, fa code Sena derscho a redamar/as auras y toe castor oxuplos porirnponeron grevemon sabrecualquierrecuparacldn de S I Q 0006 m3s do valor reelbida medlante on acuerdo a one conces!On do arblfa)e en on caso de derecho dv14 Time quapager efgraramon de /a code ands de. quo in cote pueda dosochar el cases

The name and address of the court ia:(El narvbrie y d1raccldn de Is torte es):SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT220 West BroadwaySan Diego, CA 92112-0128

GAGE JM0EFL(tXwmzWC"W:57-4011-001005aa•CU.13C.CTL

The name, address, and telephone number of plaintiffs attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney, Is:11-727111 A a rc2itE

16"_ No th ;N1airi S,'t'ree' )iy. `: =:<z ^ (F µ t'`0 55:San Andreas, CA 952 'DATE:

'NOV - 7 Z01 1 ) Clerk, byF( actin) 1Y5 _ (Secretaries,

^rproof of Set/ of fje summons, use morons form U4Niceqtoo

TICE'fD" E PTH(SCALI ERSON SEKVeD^r97waN awed1. as an Individual defendant,2. as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify):

3. 0 on behalf of (specify):under. jJ CCP 416.10 (corporation) CCP 416.60 (minor)

CCP 416.20 (defunct corporation) CCP 418.70 (conservatee)

r

;CCP 416.40.(,8 a(htn or^parmelniP)y CCP'416.90 (authorized parson)'other'(speelfy.-=.----==:-:: _.•:...._ _.J =

4. (] by personal delivery on (date):

® 8flMLFo MrauMMONS

FagN a lcode aCMI Proxd,a a 412.20. ass

www.muawmgowTHE UPPER DECK COMPANY INC,

I

Se0.11. 2012 4:49PM MICHAEL WEISBERG

1

2

3

P

FA-eslMiL-E: -(299)75540767---------.._._....._...__._-....----

LAW OFFICES OF 1Y1ICHAELWErsEERG SBN 7853 7POST OFPTCE Box 66516 NORTH Mann STREET, SurmE ASANANDREAs, CALIFORNIA 95249TELEPHONE: (209)754-0765

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF THE UPPER DECK COMPANY

No. 6402 P. 2

:t I; `'Gcrt^^

20IJNOV-4 PH P:Qf

C. j Cour{ r y, ^A

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

GOUNTY 9F SAN PIEGG

30

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

1819

=QzR21

22

THE UPPER DECK COMPANY INC., -. ;Case No, 37.2011-00100599-cU-ac-CTL

vs.

iCOMPLAINT FOR:11) BREACH OF WRITTEN CONTRACT

. BR2 KCH OF WRITTEN CONTRACT • ..',3) OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT

Plaintiff,

J&T HOBBY; JOSEPH PIROZZI individually;and DOES 1-100,

Defendant,

Plaintiff The Upper Deck Company, Inc. (hereinafter "Plaintiff) alleges as follows:

PARTIES

1. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges Defendant J&T Hobbyr

New York law, and authorized to conduct business in San Diego, California.

2. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges Defendant Joseph Pirozzi

24

25

26

yna ei 2PIro'^zzi9 rs 'e 1'resid`en of $cT an a or eesiddiC Plld-atiffis infoime3

and believes and thereon alleges Plaintiff, at all relevant times, conducted business in San Diego

County. Hereinafter J&T and Pirozzi will collectively be referred to as "Defendants".

3. Plaintiff alleges alleges on information and belief that at all relevant times,

fits g.^oye^^y' c^s^§i'iv^fs; i`ir^D'tliat^ucfs^coulpIained-of",..-w28

Seu,11. 2012 4:49PM MICHAEL WEISBERG

1

2

3

No. 6402 P. 3

3. Plaintiff alleges alleges on information and belief that at all relevant times,

Defendants and each of its agents, employees, and/or servants, in doing that acts complained of

herein, acted within the course, scope, and purpose of such agency, service, and/or employment.

11 fT--l--anan action e^Iegedia tfle causes option mto wluch-t :s paragrap7i. is . - - ---- - - ----

5 1 incorporated by reference were ratified and approved by Defendants' officers or managing

6 ul agents.

i 4. Whence r and wherever reference is made to individuals who are not named as

a

9

10

11

14

15

16

17

18

19

:•23

24

Defendants in this action, but were Defendant's employees or agents or any of them herein, such

individuals at all times acted on behalf of Defendant named in this action and within the scope of

their respective employments and agencies.

5. Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of the Defendants sued

herein as DOES •] •tbrough• 10, inclusive, and therefore sues these Defendants by such fictitious.,; ......

,.names. When ascertained, Plaintiff will amend its Complaint to allege the DOES' true names and

capacities. Plaintiff` Is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each fictitiously named

Defendant contributed to or caused Plaintiffs damages.

JUIt f SDTCTYON AND 'VENUE

6. Jurisdiction in this Court is proper as this is an unlimited civil case and the

amount in controversy exceeds Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00).

7. Venue for this action is proper in Superior Court of California, County of San

rega,beeause:-ti ntmetwa"ntered into and i3erferm llnlw-

STATEMENT OF FACTS

8. On or around July 2007, Plaintiff and Defendants entered into a written contract

(hereinafter "Contract")-whereby Plaintiff agreed to-manufacture and sell certain sports and

entertainment trading cards (hereinafter "Produce) to Defendants to be distributed throughout

the United States. In exchange for providing Defendants Product, Defendants agreed to pay

Plaintiff approximately One Million Five Hundred Thirteen Thousand One Hundred Twelve

2

Sep. 11. 2012 4:50PM MICHAEL WEISBERG No.6402 P. 4

Dollars Twenty Seven Cents ($1,513,112.27). Defendants became responsible for payment for

iW =tflt '1'rSdtl f-vhIMAIirtydays'o£the Product's shipment date. .

3 ° 9 Pursuant to and i c u ti with the C t Pi ed d en tr i i dt. on ac , rozzn j nc on s gn an xecu eo an

-'un^6n^ifiona'^personaTg6atanTy Zheremaf^er "saran to uncou^c tisona^Iy and urevoeably

guaran ty pe ormarzce an pomp paymen un er a ontrac .r

10. Thereafter, Plaintiff shipped the Product to Defendants through July 2010.

t5 J&T' fi 11 f d t t d th C t

11Froln Jss y 2008 through July 2010, Plaintiff demanded payment from Defendants

-pursuant tovthe•Contract's terms. However, Defendants failed and continue to fail to pay Plaintiff

pursuant to their obligations under the Contract.

12. As of July 2010, Defendants maintained an outstanding balance under the

Contract totaling One Million Five Hundred Three Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Three

Dollars Nineteen.Cents ($1,503,493.19).•-.--... •• .............

Contract, Defendants have yet to pay the remaining balance due and owed under the Contract

totaling One Million Five Hundred Three Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Three Dollars

Nineteen Cents ($1,503,493.19), no part of which has been paid, and all of which is due, owing

- -.13. -• --Despite Plaintiff's continued demand payment fromDefendants under the

and payable from Defendant to Plaintiff.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

(Breach of Written Contract)

As alusb4l1-Defend-.ents) ,. :n.

°̀""" 13:" Thor around July 2007, Plaintiff and Defendants entered into a' written Contract in "•

which PIaintiff agreed to manufacture and sell the Product to Defendant for Defendant's

distribution in exchange for payment of One Million Five Hundred Thirteen Thousand One

Hundred Twelve Dollars Twenty Seven Cents ($1,513,112.27).

14. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 13

above, as though fully set forth therein.

Sep. 11. 2012 4:50PM MICHAEL WEISBERG No.6402 P. 5

16. Plaintiff fully performed its obligations under the Agreement by manufacturing,

c. a selling, and shipping the Product to Defendants'througb July 2010.

3 17. Defendants breached and'continue to breach the Contract by failing to pay

-" - " ^- moitiffthe remeimng balance under t71e Contract totaling One ^ l I on Five Hundred Three

5 Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Three Dollars Nineteen Cents ($1,503,493.19).

6 18. As direct and proximate result of Defendants' contractual breach, Plaintiff

ed Three ousand Four

^_.._ 8_ -Hundred Niuety-Three-Dollars Nineteen Cents ($1,503,493.19) plus interest at the.Iega1 interest

9

10

14

15

16

17

18

19

21

25

26

27

rate.

19. Plaintiff also incurred attorneys' fees to resolve this contractual dispute.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

:..,,,....,...,,. ,:...„... (Breach of Written Contract)

:... : -- .-- .. (Against JOE PIROZZn

20. Plaintiff lncorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs 1 through 19

above, as though fully set forth therein.

21. Pursuant to and in conjunction with the Contract whereby Plaintiff agreed to

manufacture, sell, and ship Product to Defendant in exchange for payment, Pirozzi signed and

executed the Guaranty to unconditionally and irrevocably guaranty J&T's full performance and

prompt payment under the Contract.

----I^fauttYlyperfolrrred itsobligaEians undepthe^4^yatrtaetnFingr -

sell1ng, and shipping the Product to Defendants through July 2010.

23. From July 2008 through July 2010, Plaintiff demanded payment from Defendant

"pursuant tffthe"CMf t`n6zffis. However, Defendant failed and continues to fail to.piy Plaintiff

pursuant to his obligations under the Contract.

24. Despite Plaintiff's continued demand for payment from Defendant under the

Contract, Defendant has yet to pay the remaining balance due and owed under the Guaranty and

28 11 -- 4

Sep.11, 2012 4:60PM . MICHAEL WEISBERG No. 6402 P. 6

Contract totaling One Million Five Hundred Three Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Three

1^ Dollars Nineteen Cents ($1,502,493,19). --. ,•,- . _ .__..........___.___

25: Pirorai breached and continues to breach the Contract by failing to

uncondI&iiii illy prow-iae pmmpt payment to Plaintiff - - -

26. As a direct and proximate result of Pirozzi's contractual breach, Plaintiff incurred

compensatory damages totaling One Million Five Hundred Three Thousand Four Hundred

7 u Ninety Three Dollars Nineteen Cents ($1,503,493.19) plus interest at the legal interest rate, all of

.,-which.is due, owing.and.payable from Defendant to Plaintiff, and no part of which has been paid.

27. Plaintiff also incurred attorneys' :fees to resolve this contractual dispute.

l'.WI D CAUSE OF ACTION

(Open Book Account)

........ ........_ ........... ....... (Against all Defendants)

28. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of Paragraphs I through 27

above, as though fully set forth therein,

29. Within four years last past, and prior to the commencement of this action,

Defendants became indebted on an open book account to Plaintiff in the sum of One Million

Five Hundred Three Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Tiuee Dollars Nineteen Cents

($1,503,493.19) for Product furnished to Defendants by Plaintiff at Defendant's special instance

and request.

€the-afer d- -* _

there is still due, owing and unpaid to Plaintiff from Defendants the sum of One Million Five

Hundred Three Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Three Dollars Nineteen Cents ($1,503,493.19)

--sinue July 200g, on,-wliioh•date demand £or payment wasdu iy iriid6.6n Defendant's. '-

31. Plaintiff also requests attorney's fees in an amount to be proven at trial,

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants as follows:

5

Sep.11. 2012 4:51PM MICHAEL WEISBERG

6

7

...--......... _ _.. For.such.other, and furthor.relief as the Court deex s•just nd proper.

14

15

16

17

18

19

24

No.6402 P. 7

1. • Tor compensatory damages totaling One Million Five Hundred Three

-Thousand Four I-Iundred Ninety Three Dollars-Nineteen Cents ..... .

($1,503,493.19) plus interest at the legal interest rate;

3. For Reasonable attorneys' fees as provided in any agreement between that

parties, any statute or otherwise;

4. For costs of the suit; and -

.DATED; October 31,2011

25

26

27

28 6

EXHIBIT B

ATTORNEY OR PART^OPNEY(n.IP.. Sub L M, aid.ddm ): FORCOUar USE ONLY

MICHAEL WEISBERG SBN 076537Post Office Box 665 (Mailing)16 North Main Street, Suite A 1San Andreas, CA 95249 L,_I,..t.:. 'I:•:::;hi.

TELEPNONENO.: (209) 754-0765 FAXNO.(OPSJMIP (209) 754-0767E4MtAOORESS(oPeans: attorneymweisberg@yahoo. com 2T.? AUG 14 Ph 2: 17ATTORNEYFOR(Nnn.}, Plaintiff The U per Deck Co. Inc..SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF 5AN DIEGO

`'..;OI,IftiT

STREETAOORESa:22O West Broadway " • J: LUUCiU)ijY. CANAR1NGADORESS:P.O. Box 120128orvmozw cooeSan Diego, CA 92112-0128

sRANOINAME:Central DivisionPLAINTIFFIPETITIONER: The Upper Deck Company Inc.

DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: J&T Hobby; Joseph Pirozzi indiv

REQUEST FOR Entry of Default Cleric's Judgment CASE NUMBER

(Application) CourtJudgment 37-2011-00100599-CU-BC-CTL1. TO THE CLERK On the complaint or cross-complaint filed

a. on (date): 11-7-11b. by(name): The Upper Deck Company Inc.c. ® Enter default of defendant (names):

J&T Hobby; Joseph Pirozzi indivd.0 I request a court judgment under Code of Civil Procedure sections 585(b), 585(c). 989, etc., against defendant (names):

J&T Hobby; Joseph Pirozzi Indiv

(Testimony required. Apply to the clerk fore heading date, unless the court will enters judgment on an affidavit under CodeCiv. Prow, § 585(d).)

a. Q Enter derk's judgment(1) Q for restitution of the premises only and Issue a writ of execution on the judgment. Code of Civil Procedure section

1174(c) does not apply. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1169.)Q Include In the judgment all tenants, subtenants, named claimants, and other occupants of the premises. The

415.46.(2) Q under Code of Civil Procedure section 585(a). (Complete the declaration under Code Clv. Proc., § 5855 on the

reverse (Item 5).)(3) Q for default previously entered on (date):

2. Judgment to be entered. Amount Credits acknowledged Balancea. Demand of complaint ....................... $ 1, 503, 493.19 $ $ 1, 503, 493.19..--W. ems o amages .. ^__- _------------- --------...._

(1) Spedal ................................... $ $ $ 0.00(2) General ................................... $ $ $ 0.00

c. Interest ............................................ $ $ $ 0.00-a. Costs (see reverse) ....................... $ 395.00 $ $ 395.00e. Attorney fees ................................. $ 1,000.00 $ $ 1,000.00f. TOTALS .......................................... $ 1,S04,RRR.1a s 0.00 s 1,.F04,RRR_lqg. Daily damages were demanded in complaint at the rate of: $ per day beginning (date):(' Personal Injury or wrongful death actions; Code Civ. Proc., §425.11.)

3. Q (Check If filed In an unlawful detainer case) Legal document assistant or un wfu ar on Is onthe reverse (complete Item 4).

Date: 8/13/2012li hWei a ergnhaeM

(TYPE OR PRINT ILVAE) (SIGNATURE OF PW NTIFF OR ATTORNEY FOR PIARITFF)

FOR COURTUSE ONLY

(1) Default entered as requested on (date):(2) Q Default NOT entered as requested (state reason):

Deputy-

P.9. I d2Fam Adagad la MWelay U.. Cod. a CMI na.a,r.,REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULTJuda.ICev.JwxCM O §§585-581,1109cW40D[Rev. J.nxrr t, 2007] Nu MV.M - (Application to Enter Default) uw.mwbwa.9av

B"Mw " THE UPPER DECK COMPANY INC.

Upper Deck v. J&T HobbySTATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

CENTRAL DIVISIONCase No. 37-2011-00100599-CU-BT-CTL

PROOF OF'SERVICE(Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1013a, 2015)

I, Kayleigh Klinzman, declare that I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to thecase; I am employed in the County of San Diego, California, where the mailing occurs; and mybusiness address is 225 Broadway, 19`h Floor, San Diego, California 92101.

On October 11, 2012 I served the within:NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE;MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO

STRIKE;NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT;MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITES IN SUPPORT OF

DEFENDANTS' DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT;DECLARATION OF CRAIG M. NICHOLAS IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR

JUDICIAL NOTICE;REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS

DEMURRER TO THE COMPLAINT on the interested parties in said action by:

II BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION: In addition to service by mail as set forth below,the counsel or interested party authorized to accept service was also forwarded a copy ofsaid document(s) by facsimile transmission at the fax machine telephone numbercorresponding with his/her/its name. The fax machine I used complied with CRC Rule2.301(3) and no error was reported by the machine. Pursuant to CRC Rule 2.306(h)(3), lcaused the machine to print a transmission record of the transmission, a copy of which isattached to this declaration.

BY PERSONAL DELIVERY: I caused each envelope to be hand-delivered to eachaddressee leaving said envelope with either the addressee directly or another person at thataddress authorized to accept service on the addressee's behalf.

[XJ BY MAIL: as follows:

[ X] BY OVERNIGHT COURIER: I placed the above-referenced document(s) in anenvelope for collection and delivery on this date in accordance with standardFEDERAL EXPRESS overnight delivery procedures.

[] E-MAIL

[] By placing a copy thereof in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:

II

John GauleOddenino & Gaule

444 E. Hunington Drive, Suite 325Arcadia, CA 91006

N&B PROOF OF SERVICE (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1013a, 2015)Annxxms A, LAW

Sex e,x,ln

I am readily familiar with the business' practice for collection and processing ofcorrespondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service; and that the correspondenceshall be deposited with the United States Postal Service via First Class Mail on that same day inthe ordinary course of business.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that theforegoing is true and correct.

Executed on October 11, 2012, at San Diego, California.

ayleigh

28

N&B 9 2""... DIrn"'o`AW PROOF OF SERVICE (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1013a, 2015)see m

1

2

Upper Deck v. J&T HobbySTATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

CENTRAL DIVISIONCase No. 37-2011-00100599-CU-BT-CTL

PROOF OF SERVICE(Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1013a, 2015)

PARTIES SERVED:

John GauleOddenino & Gaule444 E. Hunington Drive, Suite 325Arcadia, CA 91006

Counsel for Plaintiff

N&BAITnMI.XY$ AT LAW

SAM Dien.

3PROOF OF SERVICE (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1013a, 2015)