nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of...

15
Report of Vision2020 Workshop on information needs to improve implementation of refractive error programs in India 20-25 March 2006 New Delhi, India Organized by: The International Centre for Eye Health, London, UK The Dr. RP Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India Supported by: VISION2020 (support to courses) VISION2020 India

Transcript of nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of...

Page 1: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Report of

Vision2020 Workshop on information needs to improve

implementation of refractive error programs in India

20-25 March 2006

New Delhi, India

Organized by:

The International Centre for Eye Health, London, UK The Dr. RP Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India

Supported by:

VISION2020 (support to courses) VISION2020 India

Page 2: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Background: Correction of refractive errors (RE) is a priority of VISION2020 – the Right to Sight. However, there are many unanswered questions in relation to: 1) the causes 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected REs on visual function, quality of life and income generating potential 4) the best ways of delivering RE services to those sectors of the community most in need. Purpose of the workshop: To identify gaps in the epidemiological, qualitative and operational research which limit the implementation of cost effective interventions for uncorrected REs, and to outline a programme of research which address some of these information gaps. Objectives of the workshop: The objective of the workshop was to identify gaps in information which need to be addressed for

the successful implementation of RE programs in India, and to design research studies which can provide scientifically valid evidence to improve implementation of such programs. This will ultimately help in devising effective strategies for the elimination of avoidable blindness and low vision in India.

Expected outcome: It was envisaged that at the end of the Workshop, up to 6 draft research proposals on RE would be designed for submission to funding agencies for financial support. Programme and participants: Please see Appendix 1 for details of the programme, and Appendix 2 for a list of participants

The programme was designed to give plenty of time for discussion and group work. The first 2 and a half days were spent in plenary sessions, with presentations which covered the following areas:

Page 3: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

• Epidemiologic issues in RE

• Recent Studies on RE

• Operational issues in delivery of RE services • Service delivery approaches • Service delivery approaches for specific populations

• Qualitative research and evaluation of vision screening in children • Service Costing and Economic Implications • Activities and research of the international NGOs active in India in relation to RE services

At the end of the workshop participants were given a CD containing all the presentations.

Participants were carefully selected, bearing in mind the following:

• Geographical spread • Experience in service delivery

• Expertise in research (epidemiological; operational; qualitative; economic) • Representation from the non-government sector • Representation from VISION2020 India

• Representation from the government

Page 4: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Identifying priority problems that need to be addressed: Six groups each identified information gaps, and then prioritised the top 5 that need to be addressed

to improve the delivery of RE services. A smaller group then prioritised these problems into the top 7. The priority problems identified were as follows:

1) There is inadequate data on the prevalence and magnitude of RE in adults (including presbyopia), as well as coverage of spectacle wearing and the proportion of the need that could

be met by ready made glasses 2) There is a large unmet need for RE services particularly in rural areas, and there are different

approaches to delivering services for RE at the primary level. There is no evidence regarding

which model of delivering RE services is the most cost effective or sustainable. 3) Different school programmes are using different visual acuity cut-offs, and there is no evidence

regarding which is optimal from the perspectives of sensitivity and specificity, spectacle wearing

rates and other factors which influence efficiency. 4) There is no information on attitudes towards school eye health programs from the perspectives

of teachers and students, nor on the cost effectiveness and sustainability of different approaches

to delivering these programs 5) There is no information on the impact of uncorrected REs among adults of working age in terms

of quality of life (QOL), visual function, activities of daily living, or economic productivity. There is also no information on the impact of correcting significant RE on these variables.

6) There is very little information on community’s perceptions of visual impairment due to

uncorrected REs, nor on the factors which influence demand for RE services 7) There is no communication strategy for REs, and it is not known what health education materials

already exist, how they are perceived, and the impact they have on health seeking behaviour in

relation to REs.

Page 5: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Development of research protocols: Participants selected which group they wanted to work in, and spent the next 2 days working on a

research proposal. This was done using a standard template. After each presentation there was a lot of time for discussion and feedback, and some of the proposals need amending in light of this input.

Principal Investigators for the proposals are Dr. Clare Gilbert and Dr. G V S Murthy

The following is a summary of the 7 research proposals

Group 1: Title:

National population based prevalence survey of refractive errors in adults aged >16 years

Study design: Cross sectional epidemiological study

Multi centre: Yes

Objectives: To determine the: • Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in the population above the age of

15 years • Prevalence of presbyopia • Spectacle Coverage and unmet need

• Access to eye care services among population with refractive error

Time frame: 3 years

Facilitator: Dr G V S Murthy

Contact person Dr. Asim Sil

Other group participants:

Dr. R.R.Sudhir Dr. Nitin Batra

Ms Neena John Mr. M.Srinivas

Group 2: Title:

Societal perspectives and a comparison of sustainability and cost effectiveness of different service delivery models at primary levels for

refractive errors

Study design: Cross Cutting (Economic, operational (org/non-formal), operational, QOL. VF) in rural and urban settings.

Multi centre: Yes

Objectives: • To understand the community perspective of need for refractive error service

provision at primary level. • To determine the community perspective of available RE services at primary level.

• To compare in terms of Cost-Effectiveness the 3 most common models of RE service delivery at primary level in Rural & Urban underprivileged locations.

• To identify the factors for sustainability (Technical, Managerial, Financial &

Leadership) of the compared models in Rural and Urban Area. • To disseminate and publish study results for aiding in advocacy and policymaking.

Time frame: 3 years

Facilitator: Dr. K.Vishwanath

Contact person Dr. B.R.Shamanna

Other group participants:

Ms. Leena Bhanot Mrs Gunawathy Fernandez Ms Archana Bora Mr. Anand Sudhan

Page 6: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Group 3a: Title:

Optimum visual acuity standards for school eye health programmes in India

Study design: Operational research

Multi centre: Yes

Objectives: To explore different visual acuity screening criteria in vision testing programmes for children aged 11-15 years (i.e. to compare the current criteria of <6/9 in one or both eyes with a) <6/9 tested binocularly b) <6/12 in one or both eyes c) <6/12 tested binocularly) With respect to:

• sensitivity and specificity

• spectacle wearing rates • number and nature of eye disease missed using binocular vision testing • the range and type of spectacles needed for the programme

Time frame: 2 years

Facilitator: Dr. Clare Gilbert

Contact person Dr. H. Kishore

Other group participants:

Dr. Jatin Shah Dr. Chandrashekar Shetty

Dr. Gagandeep Singh Dr. Gautam Bhaduri Dr SKD Thakur

Dr Deepak Bagga

Dr. Arun Kumar Arora Dr. Anand S.Vaijwade

Dr. Elizabeth Joseph Dr. G.V.Rao Ms Lakshmi Shinde

Dr. Pankaj Bhattacharya

Group 3b: Title:

Evaluation and comparison of the impact and cost-effectiveness of two vision screening programmes in primary and secondary schools in rural and urban South India

Study design: Operational research

Multi centre: Yes

Objectives: To assess the: • Impact of school screening on the prevalence of presenting visual impairment in

school students: by primary/ secondary school, by private/government school, sex, by cause, by caste

• Cost-effectiveness of school screening in different settings (urban vs. rural; government vs. private)

• Spectacles use (urban vs. rural; government vs. private; sex; primary vs. secondary; by refractive error, by presenting VA; caste

• Attitude towards spectacles • School performance before and after spectacles provision

Time frame: 3 years

Facilitator: Dr. Susanne Wedner

Contact person Dr. S. Sujatha

Other group participants:

Mrs. K.Mani Mala Mr. Barry Lester

Page 7: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Group 4:

Title:

Impact of correcting RE in person aged 16 and above on economic

productivity and QOL in India

Study design: Operational research

Multi centre: Yes

Objectives: • To develop and validate the an Indian Refractive Error Quality of Life Questionnaire (IND-RE-QOL) for individuals aged 16 and above

• To assess the impact of correcting refractive error on QOL • To assess the impact of correcting refractive error on economic productivity

Time frame: 3.5 years

Facilitator: Dr. Sanjeev Gupta

Contact person Dr. Kuldeep Dole

Other group participants:

Mr. V.Vijay Kumar Dr. V.R.Venkataraman

Group 5: Title:

A qualitative study using Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) as the basis of Community perception of visual needs, services and eye health seeking behaviour in India

Study design: Qualitative research

Multi centre: Yes

Objectives: To determine the following: • Community perceptions of visual needs and visual disability in daily life • Community definitions of normal and abnormal vision, visual function and the

near vision loss • Understand eye health seeking behaviour of the community (where, when and

to whom to go) • Community perceptions on services , providers and use of glasses • Perceptions of the community on relevance and role of traditional methods of

treatment in eye care • Prioritisation of visual needs in community by the level of visual loss and among

other health needs • Prioritisation of visual needs in community in relation to other health needs • Difference in age groups, gender, profession, geographical areas,

socioeconomic strata • Acceptable services in relation to cost, satisfaction and time frame

Time frame: 16 months

Facilitator: Dr. Hannah Faal

Contact person Dr. Uday Gajiwala

Other group

participants:

Mr. P.K.M.Swamy

Dr. Sara Varughese Mr. Aruneesh Singh

Mr. Krishna Kumar

Dr. Anil Tara Dr. Shashank Patel

Group 6: Title:

The impact of information and education through communication on visual impairment due to refractive errors in India.

Study design: Qualitative and operational

Multi centre: Yes

Objectives: • To identify and collate available material and methods of health education regarding refractive errors in India.

• To develop and test (if necessary) IEC material on refractive errors.

Page 8: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

• To develop marketing strategies for each target audience. • To assess the impact of health education about refractive errors on increasing

spectacle uptake.

Time frame: 4 years

Facilitator: Dr. Praveen Vashist

Contact person Dr. Noela Prasad

Other group participants:

Mr. Rajiv Williams Dr. Manish Sharma

Page 9: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Next steps:

• Two page concept notes to be drawn up by the contact person of each group with inputs from other members of the Group, to include the following: o Title

o Background, which summarises what is known, what is not known, and the rationale for the study

o Study design o Objectives of the study o Outline of methods

o Collaborating centres o Plan of activities o Budget

• Concept notes to be sent to Dr GVS Murthy by the end of April 2006 • The concept notes will then be sent to international eye NGDOs, Ministry of Health & family

Welfare, Govt. of India and other research funding agencies.

• Once the concept note is accepted, a full proposal will be prepared with the inputs from the members of the Group and will be submitted to a specific agency for support.

• Dr Clare Gilbert and Dr G V S Murthy will visit the identified research partners in India to assess the research ‘preparedness’ of the different institutions.

Page 10: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Appendix 1: Programme

Day 1 Monday March 20th

0900-

1030

Registration and Inaugural Session

GVS Murthy, C Gilbert;

H. Faal; Dr Ghose, Mr

PKM Swamy

1100-

1300

PLENARY: Epidemiologic issues in RE

ICMR Support for medical research in India

Description of refractive errors (RE) Defining coverage and unmet need

Methods of assessment of RE including rapid appraisal Global magnitude of uncorrected refractive errors

Risk factors for RE

Progression of RE- need for follow up

Chair: Dr. S.Ghose / Mr. R.D.Thulasiraj

Dr. R.S.Dhaliwal

Dr. Vijaylakshmi Dr. Hannah Faal

Dr. GVS Murthy Dr. Clare Gilbert

Dr. Manish Sharma

Dr. Susanne Wedner

1345-

1515

PLENARY: Recent Studies on RE

Refractive errors in secondary school children in Tanzania

Methodology and findings of refractive error surveys in children in India Prevalence of RE among the aged in India

Rapid assessment of RE in Gujarat- Methodology and Relevance Association of Childhood Myopia with family characteristics

Data on spectacle use in India

Follow Up of children after spectacle correction in South India

Chair: Dr. Hannah Faal/ Dr. Ramani Dr. Susanne Wedner

Dr. Clare Gilbert Mr. R.D.Thulasiraj

Dr G. Uday Ms Neena John

Dr. Kuldeep Dole

Ms Mani Mala

1545-

1715

PLENARY: Operational issues in delivery of RE services

Setting priorities for RE services

Advocacy for RE in health programs Compliance with spectacles - evidence and need for follow up studies

Frequency of replacing glasses among children and adults Norms for establishing a quality RE service Technology initiatives for affordable spectacles

IEC approaches for augmenting RE services uptake

Chair: Dr. R.S.Dhaliwal /Dr. B.R.Shamanna Clare Gilbert

Hannah Faal Suzanne Wedner

GVS Murthy Dr. Vijayalakshmi Mr. Krishna Kumar

Dr. Noela Prasad

Day 2 Tuesday 21st March

0900-

1030

PLENARY: Service delivery approaches:

Integrating RE services in primary care in urban slums

Using community volunteers for dispensing glasses Integrating RE services into CBR projects

Vision Centres: augmenting RE services, utilization & appropriate referral

Making spectacles affordable Involving trained Optometrists in RE service delivery

Bringing self-styled practitioners on board

Chair: Clare Gilbert/ Dr. Gautam Bhaduri Dr. Praveen Vashist

Dr. B. Shamanna Dr. Asim Sil

Mr. Anand Sudhan

Dr. Hannah Faal Mrs Laksmi Shinde

Mr. Srinivas

1100-1300

PLENARY: Service delivery approaches for specific populations:

Govt. of India’s vision for child’s right to sight

LCIF supported Project on school screening in Mumbai What constitutes an optimal school screening program

Plan International support to comprehensive eye care programs

Opportunistic screening strategies for industry etc. How sensitive is vision testing in children?

Chair: Mr G V Rao/ Dr. Vijayalakshmi Dr. R.Jose

Dr. Jatin Shah Clare Gilbert

Ms. N. Abraham, PLAN

Dr. Anil Tara Dr G V S Murthy

Page 11: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

1345-

1515

PLENARY: Qualitative research and evaluation of vision screening

in children:

Community perceptions and gender issues in spectacle use

Need for refractive correction in a population Designing quality of life instruments to monitor impact

Available research on quality of life instruments

Barriers to uptake of RE services Evaluation of school screening program in India

Chair: Mr. PKM Swamy/ Dr. K.Vishwanath Susanne Wedner

R.D.Thulasiraj Vijay Kumar

GVS Murthy

Dr. Ramani Asim Sil

1545-1715

PLENARY: Service Costing and Economic Implications

The need for costing of RE services Costing of services at Vision Centre level

Costing of services at secondary level institutions Costing of school eye screening programs

Economic implications of RE services

Measuring cost effectiveness of RE services

Chair: Dr C Shetty/ Dr A Tara

C Gilbert Mr.Anand Sudhan

R.D.Thulasiraj GVS Murthy

Dr B Shamanna

K. Anand

Day 3 Wednesday 22nd March

0900-

1045

NGO support for RE services research

ORBIS Plan for RE research

SSI plan for RE research CBM plan for RE research

LCIF plan for RE research SCOJO Foundation support for RE research

Vision 2020 India Forum activities for RE services

Chair: Dr Asim Sil/ Dr GVS Muthy

Mr G V Rao

Ms Elizabeth Kurien Dr Sara Varughese

Dr C.S.Shetty Mr. Aruneesh Singh

Mr PKM Swamy

1100 - 1300

GROUP WORK SESSION 1: Identifying research areas to improve implementation of RE programs in India in relation to Epidemiologic

Research, Economic implications including costing of RE services, Operational Research and Service delivery - organized sector, Operational

Research and Service delivery - non formal sector, Qualitative research,

QOL, VF

Moderators: Dr. Sanjeev Gupta

Dr Shamanna Dr Hannah Faal

Dr Clare Gilbert

Dr Suzanne Wedner Dr GVS Murthy

1345-1515

PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION FROM SESSION 1:

Group rapporteurs

Chair: Clare Gilbert/ Hannah Faal

1545-

1715

PLENARY: Identification of research priorities for India for RE services

and sources of funding

Chair: Clare Gilbert/ Hannah Faal

Day 5 Friday 24th March

All morning

GROUP WORK SESSION 2: CONTINUED

After-

noon

PLENARY SESSION:

Presentation of protocols by Groups 1-4, with discussion

Moderators: C. Gilbert,

H Faal

Day 4 Thursday 23rd March

All day GROUP WORK SESSION 2: Preparation of protocols for 7 research studies

Resource Persons: H. Faal; C. Gilbert; S. Wedner; GVS Murthy; Dr.K. Vishwanath; Dr S

Gupta; Dr Praveen Vashist

Page 12: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Day 6 Saturday 25th March

900 -1030

PLENARY SESSION: Presentation of protocols by Groups 5 and 6, with discussion

Chair: Dr. Faal/ Dr Praveen Vashist

1030 -

1300

WRAP UP SESSION:

Identification of institutions to undertake research Conclusions and recommendations

Vote of thanks

GVS Murthy, C. Gilbert, Dr Jose, H Faal. Vision

2020 India

Page 13: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Appendix 2. Workshop participants

1. Dr. Arun Kumar

Arora CEO, Dr. Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital, Daryaganj, Delhi [email protected]

2. Dr. Anil Tara CEO, Venu Eye Institute and Research Centre, 1/ 31, Sheikh Sarai Institutional Area- II; New Delhi- 110 017

[email protected]

3. Mr. Anand Sudhan Project Manager, Shri Sadguru Netra Chikitsalaya Shri Sadguru Sewa Sangh Trust Jankikund, Chitrakoot (Satna) M.P

[email protected]

4. Ms Archana Bora Faculty and Consultant Optometrist, Lotus School of Optometry, Mumbai

[email protected]

5. Mr. Arunesh Singh Country Director, SCOJO Foundation, Hyderabad

[email protected]

6. Dr Anand S. Vaijwade

Consultant Pediatric Ophthalmologist, Lions NAB Eye Hospital, Miraj

[email protected]

7. Dr Asim Kumar Sil Chief Medical Officer, Netra Niramay Niketan, Vivekanad Mission Ashram, Chaitanyapur (Haldia) Distt.-Medinipur-721645

[email protected] [email protected]

8. Alok Kumar Ravi Ph.D. Fellow, R.P.Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]

9. Mr. Bikas Chandra Mohanta

Program Manager, VISION 2020: The Right to Sight -INDIA NATIONAL SECRETARIAT, # 805, R-Block, New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi -110 060

[email protected]

10. Dr B.R.Shamanna Consultant, L.V. Prasad Eye Instt. Kismatpur Campus, Post Bag# 1, Kismatupr BO Rajendranagar PO, Hyderabad 500 030

[email protected] [email protected]

11. Mr. Barry Lester M.Sc. student, International Centre for Eye Health, LSHTM, London

BARRY. [email protected]

12. Dr S. Chandrashekar Shetty

Technical Advisor LCIF MD324, “Shashi-Arvind Nilaya” 871/72, 5th Blk, 18th Main, Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560010

[email protected]

13. Dr Clare Gilbert Reader, International Centre for Eye Health, LSHTM, London

[email protected]

14. Mr. Deepak Bagga Optometrist, Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital, 5027 Kedar Nath Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110 002

[email protected]

15. Ms. Elizabeth Kurien

Program Officer, Sight Savers, A-3, Shiv Dham Plot No.-62, New Link Road Malad (V) Mumbai-64

[email protected]

16. Dr. Elizabeth Joseph

Head of Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Little Flower Hospital & Research Centre, P.B.No. 23, Angamaly - Kerala.

[email protected]

17. Dr Gagandeep Brar

Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Post Graduate Institute, Chandigarh.

[email protected]

18. Dr Gautam Bhaduri

Director & HOD, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Medical College, Kolkata

[email protected] dr. [email protected]

19. Mrs Gunawathy Fernandez

CBM Regional Representative, SARO (South), Bangalore [email protected] [email protected]

20. Mr. G.V.Rao Country Director, ORBIS, C-10, 2nd Floor, Gulmohar Park New Dehli-110049

[email protected]

21. Dr G V S Murthy Senior Lecturer, International Centre for Eye Health, LSHTM, London

[email protected]

22. Dr Hannah Faal Regional Advisor, SSI, W.Africa, Ghana [email protected]

23. Dr H. Kishore Consultant Pediatric Ophthalmologist, B.W. Lions Superspecialty Eye Hospital, Bangalore

[email protected]

24. Dr. Jatin B. Shah Technical Advisor, LCIF MD 323, 81 Anand Bhuvan, Mangalwadi, J.S. Sheth Road, Mumbai-400004

[email protected] [email protected]

25. Ms Jyoti Shah International Centre for Eye Health, LSHTM, London [email protected]

26. Dr. K.Anand Associate Professor, Centre for Community Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]; [email protected]

27. Dr. Kuldeep Dole Consultant Community Ophthalmologist, PBMA’S H.V. Desai [email protected]

Page 14: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

Eye Hospital, 93, Tarvade Vasti, Mohamedwadi, Hadapsar, Pune-411028

28. Dr. K.Vishwanath Deputy Medical Superintendent, Sarojini Devi Eye Hospital, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad-28

[email protected]

29. Mrs. Laxmi Shinde Optometrist, Asia-Pacific Co-ordinator, IACLE, 21, 14th Cross AECS Layout, Sanjay Nagar, Banglore 560094

[email protected]

30. Ms. Leena Bhanot General Manager, Venu Eye Institute and Research Centre, 1/ 31, Sheikh Sarai Institutional Area- II; New Delhi- 110 017

[email protected]

31. Mr M. Srinivas Optometrist, L.V. Prasad Eye Instt. Kismatpur Campus, Post Bag# 1, Kismatupr BO Rajendranagar PO, Hyderabad 500 030

[email protected]

32. Dr Manish Sharma Consultant Paediatric Ophthalmologist, Shroff’s Charity Eye Hospital, 5027 Kedar Nath Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110 002

[email protected]

33. Ms K. Mani Mala Chief Executive Officer, Sankar Foundation, Vishakapatnam [email protected]

34. Dr. Nalini Abraham

Country Health Advisor, PLAN International, Delhi [email protected] [email protected]

35. Ms. Neha Tyagi Program Manager, ORBIS, C-10, 2nd Floor, Gulmohar Park New Dehli-110049

[email protected]

36. Ms. Neena John Research Officer, Department of Community Ophthalmology, Dr. RP Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]; [email protected]

37. Dr Nitin Batra Reader, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab

[email protected]

38. Dr Noela Prasad Research Medical Officer, Aravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Instt of Ophthalmology, 1 Anna Nagar, Madurai-625020

[email protected]

39. Dr. Pankaj Bhattacharyya

Trainee Consultant, Dept. of Community Ophthalmology, Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Beltola, Guwahati - 781028 (Assam)

[email protected] [email protected]

40. Mr. PKM Swamy National Executive Director VISION 2020: The Right to Sight –INDIA, National Secretariat, # 805, R-Block, New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi -110 060

[email protected]

41. Dr P.Viayalakshmi Arvind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Instt of Ophthalmology, 1 Anna Nagar, Madurai-625020

[email protected]

42. Dr P.Janakiraman Sankara Eye Hospital,. Pammal, Chennai – 600075 [email protected];

43. Dr. Praveen Vashist

Assistant Professor, Department of Community Ophthalmology,Dr. RP Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]; [email protected]

44. Dr. R.Jose Deputy Director General (Ophthalmology), Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi

[email protected]

45. Mr. R D Thulasiraj Executive Director, LAICO Aravind Eye Care System, 1 Anna Nagar, Madurai-625020

[email protected]

46. Mr R. Krishna Kumar

Principal, Elite School of Optometry, Sankara Netralaya, Chennai

[email protected]

47. Dr . R.R. Sudhir HOD Dept of Preventive Ophthalmology and Associate Consultant Cornea Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Medical Research Foundation, 18 College Road, Chennai: 600 006

[email protected]

48. Dr. R.S.Dhaliwal Assistant Director General, Indian Council for Medical Research, Ansari nagar, New Delhi-110029

[email protected]

49. Dr.R.V.Ramani Managing Trustee, Sankara Eye Centre, Sri Kanchi Kamakoti Medical Trust, Sathy Road, Sivanadapuram, Coimbatore – 641035. Tamilnadu.

[email protected]

50. Mr Rajiv Williams Asst. Regional Representative, CBM South Asia Regional Office – North C23, Sector 26; NOIDA - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA

[email protected]

51. Dr. S.Ghose Chief, Dr. R.P.Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]

Page 15: nformation needs to improve implementation of refractive ... · 2) the magnitude and types of refractive errors in different age groups and populations 3) the impact of uncorrected

52. Dr. S.K.D.Thakur Assistant Professor, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Medical College, Kolkata

[email protected]

53. Dr. Sanjeev Gupta Professor, Department of Community Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]

54. Dr. Sara Varughese

Medical Advisor, CHRISTOFFEL BLINDENMISSION South Asia Regional Office – North C23, Sector 26, NOIDA - 201 301 Uttar Pradesh, INDIA

[email protected]

55. Dr. Shashank Patel

Professor, M & J Institute of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, New Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Ahmedabad 380016

[email protected]

56. Dr. Sujatha Professor Institute of Ophthalmology Joseph Eye Hospital, Tiruchirappalli-620001

[email protected]

57. Dr Susanne Wedner

Ophthalmologist, International Centre for Eye Health, LSHTM, London

[email protected]

58. Dr. Uday R. Gajiwala

SEWA-Rural, Jhagadia- 393 110, Bharuch, Gujarat [email protected]

59. Mr V. Vijay Kumar Project Manager, Aravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Instt of Ophthalmology, 1 Anna Nagar, Madurai-625020

[email protected]

60. Dr. V. R.Venkataraman

Professor of Ophthalmology, Mahatma Gandhi Inst of Med. Sciences, Sewagram, Wardha

[email protected]

SECRETARIAL ASSISTANCE

61. Mr. Hira Ballabh Pant

Data Entry Operator, Dept. of Community Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P.Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]

62. Mr. Mahraj Singh Record Clerk , Dept. of Community Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P.Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]

63. Mr. Kamal Kishore

Field Investigator, Dept. of Community Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P.Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]

64. Mr. Jhaman Sigh Rawat

Field Investigator, Dept. of Community Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P.Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi

[email protected]