Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

29
Vanderbilt University Next Generation Network

description

Overview of the drivers behind the need for a next generation network @ Vanderbilt University.

Transcript of Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Page 1: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Vanderbilt UniversityNext Generation Network

Page 2: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Storage: Making Analog Digital

1 byte = 8 bits = 1 character 1 kilobyte = 1024 bytes 1 megabyte = 1,000,000 bytes 1 gigabyte = 1000 mb 1 terabyte = 1000 gb 1 petabyte = 1000 tb 1 exabyte = 1000 petabytes 1 zetabyte = 1000 exabytes

2

JPEG Photo @ 1600 x 1200

375,000 bytes

480P

age

Bo

ok

648,

000

byt

es /

.64

8mb

Page 3: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

20090.8 ZB

Growing by a Factor of 44xOne Zettabyte (ZB) = 1 trillion gigabytes

Source: IDC Digital Universe Study, sponsored by EMC, May 2010

The Digital Decade

2020 = 35 ZB

Page 4: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

IP Network Growth

Global IP traffic 2009 to 2014 15 exabytes per month in 2009 64 exabytes per month in 2014

2010: 5 billion internet attached devices 2020: 22 billion internet attached devices

Device Affordability and Portability iPad: 4 million shipped in August 2010; 87

million iPod touch / iPhones in Jul 2010

Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s 4

Page 5: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Intense Use

Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 5

Page 6: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Vanderbilt Network Growth2004 vs. 2010

2010 1,500 mb/s Internet 10,000 mb/s Academic bandwidth 35,127 telephones 35,137 cell phones

▪ 3,465 VU Billed 86,000+ user accounts 16.7 million authentications per

day 939 million emails

2004 180mb/s Internet 622 mbps Academic

bandwidth 27,370 telephones 7,757 cell phones 187 million emails

Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 6

Average daily Mac address connections grew from 15,000 to 20,477 ( 36%) Wireless Access Points grew from 450 to 1,666 ( 270%) Number of Wireless Users grew from 633 to 6,800 (1,037%) Managed Video streaming events grew from 3 (2004) to 172 (2009) (5,633%) Number of IP Telephony terminals grew from 0 to 2,618

Page 7: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Our Network’s Continued Activity

DescriptionUnit of

Measure 2008* Current % Change DurationPossible Attack Events Millions 9 95 972% YearlySecurity Events units 949 21,093 2,123% YearlyE-Discovery Events units 57 121 112% YearlyExternal Complaints units NA 3,089 YearlyBOTs Active units NA 224 DailyBOTS Total Detected units NA 3,114 YearlyGoogle Traffic Gigabytes NA 10,205 MonthlyFacebook Traffic Gigabytes NA 201 MonthlyTwitter Traffic Gigabytes NA 61 MonthlyHotmail Traffic Gigabytes NA 28 MonthlyMySpace Traffic Gigabytes NA 4 MonthlyLinkedIn Traffic Gigabytes NA 3 Monthlye-Harmony Traffic Gigabytes NA 1 Monthly

Note: - NA - Not available * - Earliest data from 2008

Page 8: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Intense on Real Time Services

Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s 8

Page 9: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

2004

Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 9

Data Voice

Text Video

Page 10: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

2007

Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 10

Data Voice

Text Video

Page 11: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

2010

Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 11

DataVoice

Text

Video

Page 12: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Convergence is Here

Anything, Anywhere, Anytime on Any Device 12

Page 13: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Opportunity: What is the NGN?

13

Rich, converged collaboration through the unification of voice, video, web, and collaboration tools

Enhanced security, low latency, appropriate capacity Getting the right person, to the right resource, any where, anytime, on any device.

Vo

ice

Dat

aV

ideo

Mo

bili

ty

Today’s Silos

Voice Data

VideoCollaboratio

n

NGN Unified Collaboration

Converged &Unified

Future

Page 14: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Current: Two “Data” Networks

14

Page 15: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

One Voice Network

[email protected] 15

Page 16: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

For Science and Research - What?

Distributed knowledge communities that collaborate and communicate across disciplines, distances and culture

High Performance ComputingData, Data Analysis, and

VisualizationVirtual Organizations for Distributed

CommunitiesLearning and Workforce

Development

[email protected] 16

Page 17: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

For Science and Research - Why?Science is biggerScientific instruments

collect more information at faster rates reside in different localities

Experts do not reside in one geography

Institutions house various experts in various fields

Dispersed world-wide [email protected] 17

Page 18: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Science is bigger and dispersed

Multiple disciplines Many funding agencies Many institutions Many investigators Expensive, remote

instruments Mass data generation Outside the realm of human

cognition Computation and

visualization aid understanding

[email protected] 18

Page 19: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

@ VU: LSM Five Live

[email protected] 19

Dr. David Piston - Proteomics 12 bit depth (which means

16 bit storage for each) at 512 x 512 pixels and 120 frames per second. 

This turns out to be almost exactly 1 Gbit/sec.

They are offering an increased number of channels which would be very useful for us, and that would give 4 to 16 times higher data rates. 

Of course, that isn’t currently practical for most things even if we had unlimited band width and storage, because we don’t have the analysis tools to handle that kind of data stream yet either! 

“In May [2009], my lab has already taken 7.2 TBytes of data on that system. . .”

Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope

• Scan resolution Up to 1536x1536 pixels, also for several channels, continuously variable

• Scanning speed Variable up to 120 frames/s with 512x512 pixels

• Data depth Selectable: 8 bits or 12 bits

Page 20: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

DOE National Labs

[email protected] 20

Page 21: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Science is Dispersed and CollaborativeAAU: 62 Members

Brandeis University (1985) Brown University (1933) California Institute of Technology (1934) Carnegie Mellon University (1982) Case Western Reserve University (1969) Columbia University (1900) Cornell University (1900) Duke University (1938) Emory University (1995) Harvard University (1900) Indiana University (1909) Iowa State University (1958) The Johns Hopkins University (1900) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1934) McGill University (1926) Michigan State University (1964) New York University (1950) Northwestern University (1917) The Ohio State University (1916) The Pennsylvania State University (1958) Princeton University (1900) Purdue University (1958) Rice University (1985) Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (1989) Stanford University (1900) Stony Brook University-State University of New York

(2001) Syracuse University (1966) Texas A&M University (2001) Tulane University (1958) The University of Arizona (1985) University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

(1989) University of California, Berkeley (1900) University of California, Davis (1996) University of California, Irvine (1996) University of California, Los Angeles (1974) University of California, San Diego (1982)

[email protected] 21

University of California, Santa Barbara (1995) The University of Chicago (1900) University of Colorado at Boulder (1966) University of Florida (1985) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1908) The University of Iowa (1909) The University of Kansas (1909) University of Maryland, College Park (1969) University of Michigan (1900) University of Minnesota, Twin Cities (1908) University of Missouri-Columbia (1908) University of Nebraska-Lincoln (1909) The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1922) University of Oregon (1969) University of Pennsylvania (1900) University of Pittsburgh (1974) University of Rochester (1941) University of Southern California (1969) The University of Texas at Austin (1929) University of Toronto (1926) University of Virginia (1904) University of Washington (1950) The University of Wisconsin-Madison (1900) Vanderbilt University (1950) Washington University in St. Louis (1923) Yale University (1900)

Page 22: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

National Institutes of Health: 27 Institutes and Centers

NIH provides leadership and financial support to researchers in every state and throughout the world over 325,000 extramural scientists and research personnel

at more than 3,000 institutions nationwide.

[email protected] 22

Page 23: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

The National Respiratory & Enteric Virus Surveillance (sensor nets)

[email protected] 23

Page 24: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Internet2

[email protected] 24

Page 25: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

User Created Content

Capture Lecture Events Locations Surveillance

Dissemination Uploads content

[email protected] 25

Page 26: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Intertainment (yes I spelled it right)

Netflix / YoutubeTelevisions go DigitalComputers go TV!Social and ChatGaming

[email protected] 26

Page 27: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Current State: Breakpoints

27

Solution:10G upgrade,

VRF implementation, and moving Control Point

Page 28: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Current State – Bypasses to Accommodate Specific Needs

28

Page 29: Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

29

Common Access Point

Right Person, Right Place, Right Time, Right Role

Opportunity: Flexible Access to Information