Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

12
Ho Jung Paik Department of Physics, University of Maryland 8th Japan-Korea Joint Workshop June 27, 2015 Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

description

Superconducting tensor gravitational wave detector (Superconducting Omni-directional Gravitational Radiation Observatory) SOGRO Rayleigh NN must be mitigated by 102 at 0.1 Hz for SOGRO 1 Infrasound NN must be mitigated by 103 at 0.1 Hz for SOGRO 1. Paik

Transcript of Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Page 1: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Ho Jung PaikDepartment of Physics, University of Maryland

8th Japan-Korea Joint WorkshopJune 27, 2015

Newtonian Noise Mitigationwith Tensor Gravitational Wave

Detector

Page 2: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 2

Superconducting tensor gravitational wave detector

SOGRO (Superconducting Omni-directional Gravitational Radiation Observatory)

Rayleigh NN must be mitigated by 102 at 0.1 Hz for SOGRO 1 Infrasound NN must be mitigated by 103 at 0.1 Hz for SOGRO 1.

Page 3: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 3

Newtonian gravity noise Seismic and atmospheric density

modulations cause Newtonian gravity gradient noise.

At 0.1 Hz, s ~ 35 km >> L. Gravity gradient noise L. Detecting and removing the gravity gradient noise appears to be very challenging.

GWs are transverse and cannot have longitudinal components whereas the Newtonian gradient does.

GW could be distinguished from near-field gradients, if all the tensor components are detected.

.)(')(')(')(')(')()(')()(')(')()(')(

)('

axis, 3' along traveling wave with theframe,GW In

33,23,13,

23,22,12,

13,12,11,

NGNGNG

NGNGNG

NGNGNG

hhhhhhhhhhhhh

h

Page 4: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 4

iii

R

iiii

R

iii

iR

iiii

R

iii

R

iii

R

izc

h

izc

h

iizc

h

izc

hh

zc

hh

izc

hh

233

23

13

12

222

211

]cossin))[cos((exp)('

]cossin))[cos(sin()(exp)('

]cossin)][cos(sincos)[cos()(exp)('

]sincos))[cos(sin()(exp)()('

)(sin)(exp)()('

]sincos))[cos((exp)()('

NN due to Rayleigh waves Metric perturbation tensor in the source frame:

Page 5: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 5

Removal of Rayleigh NN

)(expcsc)('cot)('cot2)(')( 32

332

1311

zR

azc

hhhh

With tensor + vertical CM (0 noise)

With tensor (SNR 103)+ vertical CM (SNR 106)+ 7 seism (5 km, SNR 103)

az() is measured by the vertical CM channel.

Page 6: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 6

Removal of infrasound NN sinexp sin)(

π4csc )('cot)('cot2)(')( i

22

233

21311

i

ISii z

cG

hhhh

Harms and Paik, PRD (2015)

With tensor + 15 mikes (0, 0.6, 1 km, SNR 104)

Is there any way that we can mitigate NN by using the tensor channels alone?

Infrasound waves come from half space with an additional unknown: polar angle of incidence .

Microphones are required to measure the air density fluctuations.

Satisfies SOGRO 1 requirement

Page 7: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 7

NN mitigation by correlation? Rayleigh and infrasound waves incident in different angles

are uncorrelated with each other and with the GW signal. This allows us to determine autocorrelations of h+() and h()

by combining correlations of various tensor outputs.

Fourier transform of autocorrelation is power spectral density.

2cos53161','

2cos35161','

2cos35161,','

83,','

3322

2323

1212

2222

hh

hh

hhhh

hhhh

23233322

1212

23233322

2222

','8

17','

815

','),(

','8

15','

89

','),(

hhhh

hhC

hhhh

hhC

Problem: It takes a long time to mitigate the NN by using correlation method.

s 105/ 10 Hz, 20

time)sampling :( )( :factor Mitigation642

4/1

ss

ss

fSTSf

fTfS

Page 8: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 8

Could SOGRO help advanced detectors mitigate NN? (HW from R.

Weiss)

Newtonian noise

Worthy mitigation goal: A factor of ~10 to 10-23 Hz-1/2 at 10 Hz and 10-21 Hz-1/2 at 1 Hz.

Worthy mitigation goal

Page 9: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 9

KAGRA sensitivity curve

The low-frequency noise of KAGRA could benefit from a similar NN rejection.

Page 10: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 10

Sensitivities to GW and NN

2/1202/121

2/1212/123

1212

Hz 1022

1 needs one ,Hz 1at Hz 10 resolve To

Hz 1022

1 needs one ,Hz 10at Hz 10 resolve To

)()( )()('

km), 10 (eter interferomlaser a from NN theremove To

hcL

h

hcL

h

xxLci

LL

hxxciLL

L

R

R

RR

.negligible is infrasound todue NN

)()(

: measures SOGRO)()(

:measureseter interferomLaser

12

RiRi

RR

ci

xXhx

xXxXhLL

At 1-10 Hz, cR = 250 m/s (surface), 3.5 km/s (deep underground). NN is uncorrelated between detector test masses.

Page 11: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

AdV) (aLIGO,detector surface afor m 40.010102

250

ET) (KAGRA,detector dundergrounan for m 6.510102

3500

Hz, 10at 10 achieve To

1

1

2

ScSc

S

c

CS

R

R

R

SN

Paik 11

Incomplete correlation of NN Mitigation factor S is given by the correlation CSN between

the detector and the NN sensor:

Beker et al., GRG 43, 623 (2011)

It is much more challenging to mitigate the NN of ground detectors.

Page 12: Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector

Paik 12

Mini-SOGRO with 5-m arm length

Mini-SOGRO with L = 5 m, M = 1 ton, T = 0.1 K could mitigate the NN at 1-10 Hz by a factor 5. NN mitigation appears very challenging but not impossible.

L = 5 m, M = 1 t, T = 0.1 K, Q = 109, n = 2, fD = 1 Hz