New2 environ law pitch

23
BIOMASS EXAMPLE WORST CASE IMPACTS “KLAMATH BIOMASS”

Transcript of New2 environ law pitch

Page 1: New2 environ law pitch

BIOMASS EXAMPLE

WORST CASE IMPACTS“KLAMATH BIOMASS”

Page 2: New2 environ law pitch

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECITVE

• ROOT PROBLEM CAUSE AND STRATEGY TO MINIMIZE

• Inadequate and misinterpreted state and county laws allows:

• --Conditional site use on private land anywhere • regardless of adverse impacts (citizens/environment)

• --Rulings that there are no significant impacts• No laws requiring evaluation of impacts• Impacts outside the council’s jurisdiction• Agency/DOJ Interpretation of no significant impacts

• Last resort solution: legal mandamus action and injunctions to force agencies to protect citizens/environment

Page 3: New2 environ law pitch

• EXAMPLES OF WORST IMPACTS:

• SITE LOCATION –WORST IMPACTS

• --Upwind—homes/non-attainment area

• --Sandwiched between residential/wildlife area on wetlands

Solution: Elimin. bad sites up front (Gov’s streamlining plan), state laws, country ordinances require protection of citizens and wildlife from adverse impacts

Page 4: New2 environ law pitch
Page 5: New2 environ law pitch
Page 6: New2 environ law pitch
Page 7: New2 environ law pitch
Page 8: New2 environ law pitch
Page 9: New2 environ law pitch
Page 10: New2 environ law pitch
Page 11: New2 environ law pitch
Page 12: New2 environ law pitch

PLANT AND TRUCK POLLUTION WILL ADD TO EXISTING EXTREME HEALTH PROBLEMS

• --Residential area vulnerable

• --Community vulnerable

Solution: State laws/county ordinances require protection of public health

Page 13: New2 environ law pitch
Page 14: New2 environ law pitch
Page 15: New2 environ law pitch

PLANT/TRUCK POLLUTION WILL ADD TO EXISTING POOR AIR QUALITY CONDITIONS IN BASIN

--Adjacent neighborhood propensity to attract toxic pollution

--Worst air quality in state and nation and recent Clean Air Act violations/ sanctions

Solutions: Sanctions and precedent cases will not allow plant in basin

Page 16: New2 environ law pitch
Page 17: New2 environ law pitch
Page 18: New2 environ law pitch

• AIR QUALITY IMPACTS GREATER THAN PERMIT• CAUSED BY INADEQUATE AND MISINTREPRED STATE AIR QUALITY

LAWS (ACDP)

• --Do not protect public health

• --Allow significant increase in toxic pollution in basin and no offsets

• --Allow underestimated emissions

• --Unaccounted for emissions and no modeling of cumulative emissions

• --Inadequate emission controls and DEQ oversight

• Solution: Enforce Clean Air Act laws, new precedent case

Page 19: New2 environ law pitch

UNACCOUNTED V PERMITTED EMISSIONS

PERMITTEDEMISSIONS

UNACCT'D FOREMISSIONS

PERMITTED EMISSIONS --ACDP Permit (site only)

Source: SORO expert reports

UNACCOUNTED FOR EMISSIONS (Worst conditions) --Excess site (malfunctions/variability's-open loop sys.) (Weak permit—omissions, miscalculations --In Adjacent neighborhood -Diesel and ash trucks -Chip pile fires and odors, etc. -Other truck influxes (log and gravel) -Other plant’s emissions drift

Page 20: New2 environ law pitch
Page 21: New2 environ law pitch

--OTHER IMPACTSImproper interpretation of state and county laws allow:

• --Adverse impacts to fish and wildlife and endangered species

• --Other impacts and Seismic risks

• --Long run negative benefits

Solution: Mandamus legal action

Page 22: New2 environ law pitch

• STATUS IN SITING PROCESS

• --STATUS • --Contested case—stay• --History--3 years in the siting process

• --RULING • --DOJ findings—state law compliance• --SORO conclusion—inadequate protection of citizens, community, fish and wildlife and environment

Page 23: New2 environ law pitch

FUTURE STRATEGY

• --Subpoena evidence

• --Conditions

• --Litigation and injunctions