Reagan's Secret War, by Martin and Annelise Anderson - Excerpt
New Physics Beyond the Standard Models with...
Transcript of New Physics Beyond the Standard Models with...
New Physics Beyond theStandard Models with SolarNeutrinos
Annelise Malkus
June 2007
Trento, Italy
ECT*
Outline
• Standard Solar Neutrino Model
• Standard MSW
• Where Can We See New Physics?
• New Models
• Conclusions
Standard MSW
€
i ∂∂t
ψe
ψx
=
ϕ(t) Λ
Λ −ϕ(t)
ψe
ψx
€
ϕ(t) =12GFNe (t) −
δm2
4Ecos(2θv )
Λ =δm2
4Esin(2θv )
What I Used
€
δm2 = 8.0 ×10−5eV 2
€
sin2(2θv) = 0.86
W.M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 33, 1(2006) (URL:http://pdg.lbl.gov)
Where Can We See New Physics?
• Adiabatic Solution
• Resonance€
P(ν e →ν e ) =12
+12cos(2θv ) cos(2θi) source
€
=12
+12cos(2θv )
−ϕ(t)Λ +ϕ 2(t)
source
€
ϕ(t) resonance =12GFNe(t) −
δm2
4Ecos(2θv) = 0
′ ϕ (t) resonance =ϕ(t) resonance + δϕ
=12GFNe(t) −
δm2
4Ecos(2θv) + δϕ = δϕ
Introduction to New Models
• New Interactions
• Mass-Varying Neutrinos
• Long Range Leptonic Forces– Scalar
– Vector
– Tensor
• Solar Density Fluctuations
New Interactions
€
LNSI = −2 2GF (ν αγρνβ )(εαβff L f Lγ
ρ ˜ f L + εαβf˜ f RE f Rγ
ρ ˜ f R ) + h.c.
€
ϕ(t) =12GFNe (t)[1+ ε11]−
δm2
4Ecos(2θv )
Λ =δm2
4Esin(2θv ) +
12GFNe (t)ε12
€
εij = εiju Nu
Ne
+ εijd Nd
Ne
A. Friedland, C. Lundardini andC. Pena-Garay, Phys. Lett. B594, 347 (2004)
Mass-Varying Neutrinos
Cosmic Coincidence Problem:
Use another “coincidence” to help:
Neutrinos couple to dark energy with scalarfield, acceleron.
R. Fardon, A.E. Nelson and N. Weiner, JCAP 0410 005 (2004)[arXiv;astro-ph/0309800]
€
ρCDM ~ ρΛ
€
ρν ~ ρΛ
Mass-Varying Neutrinos
€
i ∂∂t
ψe
ψx
=
12E
U m1 −M1(t)( )2 M3(t)2
M3(t)2 m2 −M2(t)( )2
U
† +2 2GFNe (t)E 0
0 0
ψe
ψx
€
Mi(t) = µiNe (t)Ne (t0)
k
€
ϕ(t) =12GFNe (t) − (m2 −M2(t))2
cos(2θv)2E
+ 2M3(t)2sin(2θv)2E
Λ = 2M3(t)2 cos(2θv ) −
(m2 −M2(t))2
4Esin(2θv )
V. Barger, P. Huber, D. Marfatia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 211802 (2005)
Forces Couple to Lepton Number
Universal Function
Long Range Leptonic Forces
€
W (t) = Ne(ρ)0
Rsun
∫ e− ρ− t /λ
ρ − td3ρ
M.C. Gonzales-Garcia, P.C. deHolanda, E. Masso and R.Zukanovich Funchal, arXiv:hep-ph/0609094
Scalar
€
ϕ(t) = 2GFNe (t)
+12E
m12 cos2θv − 1
2( ) + m22 sin2θv − 1
2( ) −m1ksW (t)cos2θv −m2ksW (t)sin2θv +
ks2W 2
2
Λ =12E
(m2 −m1)(m2 + m1 − ksW (t))cosθv sinθv[ ]
€
ks(e) =g02
4π=10−44
€
m1 = 0
Tensor
€
ϕ(t) =12GFNe (t) −
δm2
4Ecos(2θv ) − Eν kT (e)W (t)
Λ =δm2
4Esin(2θv )
€
kT (e) = meg22
4π=10−60eV −1
Solar Density Fluctuations
€
Ff (t) = 0
Ff (t)Ff ( ′ t ) = 2τδ(t − ′ t )
€
ϕ(t) =12GFNe (t) −
δm2
4Ecos(2θv ) +
GF
2β Ne(t) Ff (t)
Λ =δm2
4Esin(2θv)
F.N. Loreti and A.B. Balantekin,Phys. Rev. D 50 4762 (1994)[arXiv:nucl-th/9406003];
A.B. Balantekin and H. Yuksel,Phys. Rev. D. 68, 013006 (2003)[arXiv:hep- ph/0303169
Summary
• Many new models contain similarformulation:
• This is visible at ~1 MeV, independentof model
€
′ ϕ (t) =ϕ(t) + δϕ
References1. Bahcall, Serenelli, ApJ, 621, L85 (2005)
2. Figure 6.1 in Neutrino Astrophysics, J.N. Bahcall
3. Solar+KamLAND parameter space
4. SNO Salt + KamLAND
5. PDG(2007)
6. A. Friedland, C. Lundardini and C. Pena-Garay, Phys. Lett. B594, 347 (2004)
7. V. Barger, P. Huber, D. Marfatia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 211802(2005); R. Fardon, A.E. Nelson and N. Weiner, JCAP 0410005 (2004) [arXiv;astro-ph/0309800]
8. M.C. Gonzales-Garcia, P.C. deHolanda, E. Masso and R.Zukanovich Funchal, arXiv:hep-ph/0609094
9. F.N. Loreti and A.B. Balantekin, Phys. Rev. D 50 4762 (1994)[arXiv:nucl-th/9406003]; A.B. Balantekin and H. Yuksel, Phys.Rev. D. 68, 013006 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0303169]
DickensIt was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was
the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, itwas the epoch of belief, it was the epoch ofincredulity, it was the season of Light, it was theseason of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it wasthe winter of despair, we had everything before us,we had nothing before us, we were all going direct toheaven, we were all going direct the other way - inshort, the period was so far like the present period,that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on itsbeing received, for good or for evil, in the superlativedegree of comparison only.
Grueling Detail-Solving Evolution
• For all hermitianmatrices, we candiagonalize, usingeither the adiabaticapproximation ornumerically
• Otherwise, we mustsolve completelynumerically
€
ψ(t + Δt) =Ue−iΔtDU†ψ(t)€
Dadiabatic =− ϕ 2 + Λ 0
0 ϕ 2 + Λ
€
D =UHU†
U =cosθm −sinθmsinθm cosθm
cos(2θm ) ≡−ϕ
ϕ 2 + Λ
sin(2θm ) ≡Λ
ϕ 2 + Λ
Grueling Detail-Hermite Weights
• Approximate radialdistributions asgaussiandistributions, with
• Each process, j, isproduced on adifferentdistribution. €
ψ(E) j =
Wi ψ t j +xiσ j
Rsun ,E
i∑
Wii∑
€
σ j,rj
Grueling Detail-Weighting by Flux
• For each process, j, the flux of neutrinosvaries by energy
€
ψ(E) total =
ψ(E) jΦ jj=Be,B ,pp∑
Φ jj=Be,B ,pp∑
SNO Salt and KamLAND [4]
Joint analysis of the solarneutrino dataincluding final SNOsalt results along withthe most recentKamLAND data