New Coke Fiasco

23
New Coke Fiasco

Transcript of New Coke Fiasco

Page 1: New Coke Fiasco

New Coke Fiasco

Page 2: New Coke Fiasco

Brief History

Page 3: New Coke Fiasco
Page 4: New Coke Fiasco

April 23, 1985

Coca Cola announced reformulation of Coke

July 11, 1985

Reinstating old coke as Coca Cola Classic

Page 5: New Coke Fiasco
Page 6: New Coke Fiasco
Page 7: New Coke Fiasco

Pepsi’s blind taste tests suggested

that America preferred Pepsi

over Coke

Coke was loosing market share

Coke was considered an old brand, whereas Pepsi was young

and energetic

Business Environment

Page 8: New Coke Fiasco

So how did coke handled this difficult situation?

Page 9: New Coke Fiasco

Gain the lost Market Share

Beat Pepsi

Revamp Brand

Strategy

Sweeter Taste

Cool Packaging

Advertisement Campaign

Plan

Coke’s Reaction

Page 10: New Coke Fiasco

And what about Customer Reaction??

Page 11: New Coke Fiasco

Customer’s ReactionA man wrote to Mr. Goizueta asking for his autograph — because, in years to come, the signature of "one of the dumbest executives in American business history" would be worth a fortune.

When the taste change was announced, some consumers panicked, filling their basements with cases of Coke®.

A man in San Antonio, Texas, drove to a local bottler and bought $1,000 worth of Coca-Cola.

Protesters at a Coca-Cola event in downtown Atlanta in May carried signs with "We want the real thing" and "Our children will never know refreshment."

Page 12: New Coke Fiasco
Page 13: New Coke Fiasco

Back to Classic

Introduced within 77

days

Classic Coke

outsold New Coke

Coke gained market

share from Pepsi

Coca Cola Classic to Coca-Cola

in 2009

New Coke line

terminated in 1992

Old Formula

for loyalists

Page 14: New Coke Fiasco

And what about Customer Reaction??

So what went wrong?

Page 15: New Coke Fiasco

Backlash

CustomersResistance to

ChangeStrong American

ValueBrand associated to

culture

Coca-ColaBiased Market

ResearchLow confidence in

Brand Attribute based war

Page 16: New Coke Fiasco

Misalignment of competencies

Page 17: New Coke Fiasco

Coke’s Strength - Association with History

Page 18: New Coke Fiasco

Coke’s Strength - Association with Culture

Page 19: New Coke Fiasco

ResonanceInvolvement, Community, Attachment

JudgementInnovation,

Loyalty, Leader, Superiority

FeelingHappiness, Sharing, Celebration, Family,

Self respect

ImageryHappiness, Moments, Christmas, Social, Fun

PerformanceRefreshment, Unique

Flavour, Reference of Colas, Energy, Tasty

SalienceEverywhere, American Values, Fresh Drink, Happiness, Thirst Quencher, Lovermark

Misalignment of Strength

Attack

Strength

War Zone

Page 20: New Coke Fiasco
Page 21: New Coke Fiasco

ResonanceInvolvement, Community, Attachment

JudgementInnovation,

Loyalty, Leader, Superiority

FeelingHappiness, Sharing, Celebration, Family,

Self respect

ImageryHappiness, Moments, Christmas, Social, Fun

PerformanceRefreshment, Unique

Flavour, Reference of Colas, Energy, Tasty

SalienceEverywhere, American Values, Fresh Drink, Happiness, Thirst Quencher, Lovermark

Coca-Cola to New Coke

100 years of relationship with American Values

Deterioration of Brand Equity

New packaging and taste means lost attachment, So basically a new brand

Page 22: New Coke Fiasco

Learnings

Product Perception is more important than Product

Emotional attachment to brand can be irrational

Imitation doesn’t provide competitive advantage

Listen to your customers

Prevent biases in Market Research

Align competition and competencies well

Page 23: New Coke Fiasco

Disclaimer

Created byHiteshwar Gaur, IIM Lucknow

under

Prof. Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow