New ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT · 2019. 11. 25. · Holly Area School District 6 1.6% Durand Area...
Transcript of New ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT · 2019. 11. 25. · Holly Area School District 6 1.6% Durand Area...
ACADEMICPERFORMANCEREPORTWoodland Park Academy
November 2019
OUR MISSIONTo transform public education through accountability, innovation andaccess to quality education for all students.
OUR VISIONWe envision a diverse and dynamic public education marketplacethat fosters academic excellence for all children.
OUR VALUESIntegrity | Respect | Compassion | InclusivenessSocial Responsibility | Excellence | Innovation
Woodland Park AcademyTable of Contents
ACADEMY OVERVIEW
4 Demographics
5 Composite Resident District
ACADEMIC
6 Reading Achievement & Growth
8 Math Achievement & Growth
10 Michigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement
11 Student Growth
12 Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement
14 Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement
END NOTES
15 Sources & Citations
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 3
Woodland Park AcademyDemographics
68%
69%
68%
69%
67%
81%
83%
71%
81%
70%
15%
13%
12%
15%
13%
2%
2%
2%
2%
3%
56%
51%
51%
55%
50%
Studentsof Color
Free/ReducedLunch
SpecialEducation
EnglishLanguageLearner
Enrolled3 or MoreYears
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
2018−2019 2017−2018 2016−2017
2015−2016 2014−2015
ENROLLMENT BY SUBGROUP
Fig. D−1
386394402398420
0
200
400
600
2014
−201
5
2015
−201
6
2016
−201
7
2017
−201
8
2018
−201
9
Stu
dent
s
TOTAL ENROLLMENT BY YEAR
Fig. D−2
30
1
41
26
16
31
12
31
16
34
15
39
10
31
16
22
15
0
20
40
60
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Stu
dent
s
Students Enrolled 0−2 Years
Students Enrolled 3+ Years
STUDENTS PER GRADE
Fig. D−3
African American
YourSchool
American Indian
CMUAverage
Asian
StateAverage
Hawaiian
Hispanic
Multiracial
White
50.3%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
2.6%
14.5%
32.4%
44.9%
0.3%
3.3%
0.0%
3.3%
8.0%
40.1%
17.6%
0.6%
3.5%
0.1%
8.0%
4.2%
66.0%
RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN
Fig. D−4
4 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Woodland Park AcademyComposite Resident District
The Composite Resident District (CRD) illustrates the public school district to which students would be assigned if they were notenrolled in the Academy. Due to geographical constraints, the map may not show all districts.
!(
OaklandCounty
Saginaw County
LapeerCounty
Genesee County
Livingston County
ShiawasseeCounty
Durand4
Holly6
Davison2
Linden2
Flint240
Swartz Creek2 Grand Blanc
33
Mt. Morris13
Carman-Ainsworth42
Atherton32
Bentley2Beecher
1
Bendle6
!(
0 2 4Miles
Woodland ParkAcademy
!( SchoolStudentPopulation:
Lowest 25%25% - 50%50% - 75%Highest 25%
Student’s Resident District Number of Students Percent of Students
Flint, School District of the City of 240 62.2%Carman-Ainsworth Community Schools 42 10.9%Grand Blanc Community Schools 33 8.5%Atherton Community Schools 32 8.3%Mt. Morris Consolidated Schools 13 3.4%
Bendle Public Schools 6 1.6%Holly Area School District 6 1.6%Durand Area Schools 4 1.0%Bentley Community School District 2 0.5%Davison Community Schools 2 0.5%
Linden Community Schools 2 0.5%Swartz Creek Community Schools 2 0.5%Beecher Community School District 1 0.3%Jefferson Schools (Monroe) 1 0.3%
Fig. D-5
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 5
Woodland Park AcademyReading Achievement
194
206
205
207
213
150
200
250
300
3 4 5 6 7Grade
Ave
rage
Sca
led
Sco
re
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets
STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
MAP® SPRING RESULTS − READING ACHIEVEMENT
35%
35% Students Met Target
65% Students Did Not Meet Target
2016−2017
36%
36% Students Met Target
64% Students Did Not Meet Target
2017−2018
38%
38% Students Met Target
62% Students Did Not Meet Target
2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET
Fig. A−1
6 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Woodland Park AcademyReading Growth
Grade 3
180
200
220
Fall Spring
Grade 3
Grade 3
Grade 4
Fall Spring
Grade 4
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Fall Spring
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
180
200
220
Fall Spring
Grade 6
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Fall Spring
Grade 7
Fall Spring
NA
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − READING GROWTH
26%
13%
4%
57%34
2016−2017
37%
13%5%
45% 48
2017−2018
35%
14%3%
48% 49
2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES
Fig. A−2
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 7
Woodland Park AcademyMath Achievement
201
209
212
208
218
150
200
250
300
3 4 5 6 7Grade
Ave
rage
Sca
led
Sco
re
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets
STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
MAP SPRING RESULTS − MATH ACHIEVEMENT
25%
25% Students Met Target
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
2016−2017
30%
30% Students Met Target
70% Students Did Not Meet Target
2017−2018
34%
34% Students Met Target
66% Students Did Not Meet Target
2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET
Fig. A−3
8 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Woodland Park AcademyMath Growth
Grade 3
180
200
220
Fall Spring
Grade 3
Grade 3
Grade 4
Fall Spring
Grade 4
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Fall Spring
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
180
200
220
Fall Spring
Grade 6
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Fall Spring
Grade 7
Fall Spring
NA
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − MATH GROWTH
17%
11%
3%68%
29
2016−2017
28%
15%
5%
53% 42
2017−2018
32%
11%3%
54% 41
2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES
Fig. A−4
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 9
Woodland Park AcademyMichigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement
30.0%
23.1%22.7% 27.2%
62.3% 62.0%
57.8%54.9%
24.7%
25.6%
16.0%19.1%
47.3%
46.0%43.9%
44.3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
M−STEP ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
13.7%
18.3% 19.1%21.7%
48.0% 46.5% 43.0% 41.4%
14.7%15.3%
10.2%13.3%
37.3%37.9% 37.4% 38.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
M−STEP MATH
Fig. A−5
10 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Woodland Park AcademyStudent Growth
48
43
5149
5154
4748
44
46
35
45
50 50 5050
20
40
60
80
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Mea
n S
tude
nt G
row
th P
erce
ntile
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
4449
53
42
5250
48 47
3843
38
4250
5050 50
20
40
60
80
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Mea
n S
tude
nt G
row
th P
erce
ntile
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
MATH
Fig. A−6
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 11
Woodland Park AcademyPreliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement
61.9
%
78.3
%
31.3
%
50.0
%
0%
25%
50%
75%
2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADE 8 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
8.1%
16.7%
41.4
%
48.6
%
0%
25%
50%
75%
2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADE 8 MATH
Fig. A−7
12 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Woodland Park AcademyPSAT Achievement
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 MATH
Fig. A−8
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 13
Woodland Park AcademyScholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
GRADE 11 SAT EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
GRADE 11 SAT MATH
Fig. A−9
14 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Woodland Park AcademySources & Citations
Fig. D-1 CEPI Public Data; Michigan Student Data System (MSDS) fall – UnauditedFig. D-2 CEPI Public DataFig. D-3 MSDS fall – Unaudited; The display of 3+ students in kindergarten and first grade is due to the enrollment date provided in the fall MSDS.Fig. D-4 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. D-5 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-1 NWEA’s MAP: reading – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-2 NWEA’s MAP: reading – springFig. A-3 NWEA’s MAP: math – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-4 NWEA’s MAP: math – springFig. A-5 Spring M-STEP – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-6 Spring MI-Access, M-STEP, PSAT 8, SAT – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-7 Spring PSAT 8 – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-8 Spring PSAT 9 & 10 – Student-levelFig. A-9 Spring SAT – Student-level and Public Data
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 15
THE GOVERNOR JOHN ENGLER CENTER FOR CHARTER SCHOOLSCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY | MOUNT PLEASANT, MI 48859
(989) 774-2100 | www.TheCenterForCharters.org