New 1457 IEPC-93-165 SEMI- EMPIRICAL INTERIOR BALLISTICS...

4
1457 IEPC-93-165 SEMI- EMPIRICAL INTERIOR BALLISTICS SIMULATION MODEL OF ARC HEATED LIGHT GAS GUN A.M. Glukhov IPERAS 18 Dvortsovaya, SLPetersburg, 191065, Russia ABSTRACT aX Covolume A mathematical model of hypervelocity p Density electrical arc heated light gas gun has been developed that enables to predict all the major P Pressure gas dynamics parameters of AHLGG vs time and co-ordinate and also the components of R Gas Constant energy conversion during the launching process. The laws of electric energy delivery T Gas Temperature and arc current are used as the initial data. The model is based upon a set of equations of f Electric Charge S- D non - steady motion of compressible gas, combined with empirical relations, Ce Erosion Law Constant describing losses of energy during arc heating t Time process and ingress of the metal vapor into the light gas due to the electrode erosion. The I Arc Current working gas is considered as a binary one, which composition and properties depend on U Arc Potential. Averaged Over Time electric parameters of discharge and type of the electrodes material. The empirical data W Closed Vessel Volume used were obtained at the arc current up to 1.5 MA and the hydrogen density of 10-30 Ee Arc Electric Energy, Ee= U kg/m 3 . The system of equations was solved numerically by means of the Godunov's Ein Internal Energy Increment method. The model and the software had been verified by the series of 43 tests and the H Electrodes Enthalpy of Destruction quantitative parameters of deviations had been obtained. T1 Arc Heating Efficiency NOMENCLATURE V Muzzle Velocity AHLGG Arc Heated Light Gas Gun Vo Muzzle Velocity at Zero Metal Vapor Injection Conditions g Pure Gas Subscript INTRODUCTION m Metal Vapor Subscript Inspite of the AHLGG had been described y Mass Fraction more than 30 years ago, 1 reports on numerical models of electrothermal launchers have CO Mass of Gas Component appeared only in recent time. Probably, that is caused by relatively recent appearance of M Molecular Mass effective methods of gas dynamics equations solution and experimental data on features of C Specific Heat the interior ballistics of the AHLGG. The major feature is, first of all, electrode erosion, that k Specific Heats Ratio consumes a lot of electric energy (20-70 % as usual) and causes metal vapor ingress into the

Transcript of New 1457 IEPC-93-165 SEMI- EMPIRICAL INTERIOR BALLISTICS...

  • 1457 IEPC-93-165

    SEMI- EMPIRICAL INTERIOR BALLISTICS SIMULATIONMODEL OF ARC HEATED LIGHT GAS GUN

    A.M. GlukhovIPERAS

    18 Dvortsovaya, SLPetersburg, 191065, Russia

    ABSTRACT aX Covolume

    A mathematical model of hypervelocity p Densityelectrical arc heated light gas gun has beendeveloped that enables to predict all the major P Pressuregas dynamics parameters of AHLGG vs timeand co-ordinate and also the components of R Gas Constantenergy conversion during the launchingprocess. The laws of electric energy delivery T Gas Temperatureand arc current are used as the initial data.The model is based upon a set of equations of f Electric ChargeS- D non - steady motion of compressible gas,combined with empirical relations, Ce Erosion Law Constant

    describing losses of energy during arc heating t Timeprocess and ingress of the metal vapor into thelight gas due to the electrode erosion. The I Arc Currentworking gas is considered as a binary one,which composition and properties depend on U Arc Potential. Averaged Over Timeelectric parameters of discharge and type ofthe electrodes material. The empirical data W Closed Vessel Volumeused were obtained at the arc current up to 1.5MA and the hydrogen density of 10-30 Ee Arc Electric Energy, Ee= Ukg/m 3 . The system of equations was solvednumerically by means of the Godunov's Ein Internal Energy Incrementmethod. The model and the software had beenverified by the series of 43 tests and the H Electrodes Enthalpy of Destructionquantitative parameters of deviations had beenobtained. T1 Arc Heating Efficiency

    NOMENCLATURE V Muzzle Velocity

    AHLGG Arc Heated Light Gas Gun Vo Muzzle Velocity at Zero Metal VaporInjection Conditions

    g Pure Gas Subscript

    INTRODUCTIONm Metal Vapor Subscript

    Inspite of the AHLGG had been describedy Mass Fraction more than 30 years ago, 1 reports on numerical

    models of electrothermal launchers haveCO Mass of Gas Component appeared only in recent time. Probably, that is

    caused by relatively recent appearance ofM Molecular Mass effective methods of gas dynamics equations

    solution and experimental data on features ofC Specific Heat the interior ballistics of the AHLGG. The major

    feature is, first of all, electrode erosion, thatk Specific Heats Ratio consumes a lot of electric energy (20-70 % as

    usual) and causes metal vapor ingress into the

  • IEPC-93-165 1458

    0 100 describing arc heating, which are obtained inS/ dedicated experiments. 2 These relations, being080 - - combined with the gas dynamics system of

    So equations for the pure gas and erosion

    v 60 -- -- products mixture, give the entire mathematicalmodel of interor ballistics of the AHLGG. In

    S40 general, such a model is similar to modernO 4 classical gun models, where empirical relations

    20 / 0 for the powder burning are currently in use.

    S0 / - - EMPIRICAL RELATIONS

    S0 1 2 3 4 5S 4 Dedicated experiments were carried out byeroded mass, g means of the closed vessel technique.

    Experiments with heavy projectiles were usedFig.l Energy losses vs eroded mass of as well, because their conditions are prettyelectrodes for tungsten and hydrogen. close to that of the constant volume. In each

    experiment electrodes weighing was carriedout, that enabled to establish the relationbetween the eroded mass and electric charge :

    light gas. This causes formation of the mixtureof the light gas and erosion products, which .m = C 2properties differ much from that of the pure

    e

    gas. These processes have a considerable effecton the AHLGG performance. That is why The relation is obtained for various metals andattempts to use quite perfect gas dynamics tests conditions.3 For tungsten the value of Ce

    models without erosion consideration lead to is found to be about 40 mg/C.

    remarkable disagreement of computational andexperimental results, which grows with the The arc heating efficiency was studied byvelocity increase. As the experimental means of the closed vessel only. The

    investigation of arc burning at gun pressure experimental conditions are described in.2

    and megaampere current is extremely difficult, Assume that all the energy loss is consumed

    there are no sufficient data for creation of the by an ablation of the electrodes metal and

    theoretical model of light gas arc heating. there is a linear function between the lost

    Therefore one has to use empirical relations, energy and eroded metal mass, then the

    Fig.2 Total density (upper curves) and metal vapor density (lower curves) vs time and co -ordinate.

  • 1459 IEPC-93-165

    process in the vessel can be described by the The state equation was adopted in a Duprefollowing equations of mass and energy form P(l/p-ayg)=RT, and the covolume aconservation: was considered as the function of the pressure

    up to 10 kbar.

    Wdp m = I (1) 0-D equations of continuity and energy fordt , the chamber included terms, describing metal

    vapor ingress and energy loss, related to theW- -d m electrode erosion.

    W dP_dE dPm (2)S- HW The barrel process was described by two

    k-1 dt dt dt continuity equations (for each mixturecomponent); momentum equation, including

    Substituting Eq.(1) in Eq.(2) and integrating the the gas skin friction; energy equation,resulting equation over the burning time, we including convective heat transfer to walls ofget the expression for the energy loss: the barrel. The skin friction and the heat

    transfer were evaluated for the conditions of

    E - E = HC 0 the gas flow in the tube behind theSaccelerating piston. The dependence of the gasviscosity and thermal conductivity on

    Defining h= Ein/Ee as the arc heatingSa t a temperature was represented by exponentialefficiency we obtain: approximations.

    S=approximations.

    HCe (3) The projectile motion equation included the~ l ~ projectile friction force and the ambint back

    U pressure. The piston friction was evaluatedusing the experimentally found friction

    The validity of the assumed proportionality coefficientbetween the energy loss and the eroded massis confirmed by the experimental data (see SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEMFig.l). The estimated value of the enthalpy ofdestruction for tungsten is close to 20 MJ/kg. The problem was solved by means ofNote, that, according to the arc efficiency Godunov's discontinuity decay on a movingdefinition, the product in the fraction grid technique. 4 The chamber was treated as anumerator in Eq.(3) is the electrode potential single mesh. Mass fluxes of the twodrop. For tungsten this value is about 750 V. componenets were computed separately by theOn the basis of Eq.(3) we can make an uniform procedure. Probably it was theimportant remark: for the efficiency increase Godunov's approach that prevented thethe total arc potential should be increased, troubles of negative mass fractions. 5 TheThis equation enables to estimate practically program had been written down in VAX-attainable arc heating efficiency. If the value of FORTRAN language. The runtime was withinU is 8-10 kV, which corresponds to the 10-70 minutes depending on the bore andcapacitor bank maximum voltage of 20-25 velocity. The output data were presented inkV, then r should be greater than 0.9. table and graphic form.

    MODEL DESCRIPTION Besides ordinary projectile and gas motionparameters, the program puts out the metal

    The assumption had been made, that the pure vapor density as the function of the time andgas and erosion products form a homogenious, co-ordinate (Fig. 2). The graph is plotted forthermally equilibrium mixture, behaving as a the example with the burning time exceedingbinary gas. Taking into account real properties 1/2 of the total launching time and the muzzleof metals and gases and also reasonable pure velocity of 4.2 km/s. The program also putsgas mass fraction, the following binary gas out the istantaneous energy balance table forparameters were derived: M= M/yg, C= C/g, any moment of the launching which is prettyk=kg.The isentropic exponent was treated as useful for estimation of the role of separatea function of temperature and pressure up to processes in the entire launching process.104 K and 10 kbar.

  • IEPC-93-165 1460

    1.4 0 0 CONLUSIONS1.4 , 0

    S1. o The phenomenological approach in arc1. burning process represntation proved to be

    1.0 -- valid for application in the AHLGG simulation.So ° o a 000o a% The simulation model of the AHLGG based onS0.8 empirical relations for arc burning predicts

    oo o° o° satisfactorily the major gun parameters.

    1 2 3 4 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTVpredited, km/s

    The author would like to acknowledge thefriendly cooperation of Mr. S.A. Kudryavtsev in

    Fig.3 Coincedence of predicted and measured the software developmentvelocities.

    REFERENCES

    I Journeau A., Capelier C., Leboucher,EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION Lecomte C. Rapport de mission aux Etats-

    Unis., LRBA, Vernon, 1961.The accuracy of produced simulation modelhad been evaluated by comparison of 2 Budin A.V., Glukhov A.M., Kolikov V.A.,computations results and experimental data. Rutberg F.G., Shirokov N.A. MegaampereFor this purpose a series of 43 shots3 had been Current Pulse Generation in High Densityused. The gun parameters were the following: Hydrogen. Megagauss Fields and Pulsedbore 30 mm, barrel length 4 m, chamber Power Systems (MG -V). Nova Science Publ.,volume 0.59-1.5 1, arc energy 0.2-1.7 MJ, New.York, 1990.cold hydrogen pressure 17-43 MPa. Therange of the projectille mass was 13.5-250 g. 3 Glukhov A.M., Kolikov V.A., Levchenko B.P.,The coicidence of results can be described by Rutberg Ph.G. Electrical Light Gas Gun as anthe ratio of measured to predicted velocity as Effective Hypervelocity Launcher. Megagaussthe function of the predicted velocity (Fig. 3). Fields and Pulsed Power Systems (MG -VI).The distribution law of values is close to Nova Science Publ., New.York, 1992.normal with the mean value of 1.0 and thestandard deviation of 0.2. The values of the 4 roAyHos C.K. 'HcAeHHoe pemeHHemaximum chamber pressure were processed in MHOroMepHUX 3aAa' ra3oBo~f AHHaMHKH. M.the same manner. The following parameters of HayKa, 1976.accuracy had been obtained: the mean value ofmeasured-to-predicted ratio was 0.73, the 5 Larrouturou B. How to Preserve the Massstandard deviation was 0.2. Fraction Positivity When Computing

    Compressible Multi-components Flows. J.APPLICATIONS Comp. Phys., v.95, 59-84, 1991.

    The created software proved to be a very 6 Glukhov A.M. Numerical Modelling andconvinient and reliable istrument for AHLGG Optimization of Arc Heated Light Gasanalysis and design. It was used effectively for Launcher. 4th European Symposium onenergy balance studies and for AHLGG Electromagnetic Launch Technology. Celle,optimization.6 In particular the model was used 1993.for estimation of eroded metal injection effecton the muzzle velocity. The example of thegun with the total eroded mass of about that ofthe pure gas was investigated. The two sets ofcomputations were carried out for variousmasses of projectiles: one with consideration ofinjection (velocity V) and another - without(velocity Vo). For the values of V 1.8, 3.8 and7.0 km/s the corresponding values of V/Vo1.04, 0.96and 0.76 have been obtained.