Neurobiology of Addiction
Transcript of Neurobiology of Addiction
Neurobiology of Addiction
Cindy Miner, Ph.D.Deputy Director
Office of Science Policy and CommunicationsNational Institute on Drug Abuse
National Institutes of Health
Department of Health and Human Services
Chief Resident Immersion Training Program
Cape Cod, MA
May, 2009
In 2007, an estimated 19.9 million
Americans, or 8 percent of the
population aged 12 or older, were
current illicit drug users.
Sources: 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), SAMHSA
Past Month Use of Selected Illicit Drugs
among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2007
2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, SAMHSA
Past Month Illicit Drug Use, by Age: 2007P
erce
nt
Usi
ng
in
Pa
st M
on
th
Age in Years
12-13 14-15 16-17 18-20 21-25 26-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65+
Source: 2007 National Survey on Drug Use & Health (SAMHSA)
Percent of Students Reporting Any
Illicit Drug Use in Past Year, by
Grade
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05
8th Grade 10th Grade 12th Grade
* Denotes significant difference
between recent peak year and
current year.
*
*
*
Prevalence of Drugs Among High School Seniors2005 Monitoring the Future Study
* Percentage reporting use in past year. **Nonmedical use.
Drug Prev.* Drug Prev.*Marijuana/Hashish 33.6 MDMA (Ecstasy) 3.0Vicodin** 9.5 Methamphetamine 2.5Amphetamines 8.6 "Ice" 2.3Sedatives** 7.2 Crack 1.9Tranquilizers** 6.8 LSD 1.8OxyContin** 5.5 Ketamine 1.6Cocaine (any form) 5.1 Steroid** 1.5Inhalants 5.0 PCP 1.3Cocaine Powder 4.5 Rohypnol 1.2Ritalin** 4.4 GHB 1.1
Source: Gfroerer, JC et al., SMA 02-3711, OA, SAMHSA – Data from National Survey of Drug Use and Health.
Child<12
Teen12-17
Young Adult18-25
Adult>25
Per
cen
t of
Init
iate
s
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Age at Which Marijuana UseIs First Initiated
ADDICTION IS A DEVELOPMENTAL DISEASE
starts in adolescence and childhood
NIAAA National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, 2003.
Age
Age at tobacco, at alcohol and at cannabis dependence as per DSM IV
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
5 10 15 21 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
% i
n e
ach
age
gro
up
wh
o d
evel
op
firs
tti
me
dep
end
ence
THCALCOHOL
TOBACCO
ADDICTION IS A DEVELOPMENTAL DISEASEstarts in adolescence and childhood
Estimated Economic Cost to Society from
Substance Abuse and Addiction:
Illegal Drugs: $161 Billion/Year
Alcohol: $185 Billion/Year
Tobacco: $138 Billion/Year
Total: $484 Billion/Year
Economic Costs of Substance Abuse
• Health Care Expenditures
– Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services
– Medical Consequences
• Productivity Impacts (Lost Earnings)
– Premature Death
– Impaired Productivity
– Institutionalized Population
– Incarceration
– Crime Careers
– Victims of Crime
• Other Impacts on Society
– Crime
– Social Welfare Administration
– Motor Vehicle Crashes
– Fire Destruction
Americans’ Views of the Seriousnessof Health Problems(Top Ten of Thirty-Six Problems)
65%
65%
68%
69%
71%
73%
74%
75%
78%
82%
Stress
Alcohol abuse
Smoking
Child abuse
Violence
HIV/AIDS
Heart disease
Drunk driving
Cancer
Drug abuse
% s
ay
ing
“v
ery
ser
iou
sp
rob
lem
”
Harvard School of Public Health/Robert Wood Johnson Foundation/ICR, August 2000
Drug abuse
Smoking
HIV/AIDS
Child abuse
Violence
Stress
Cancer
Drunk driving
Heart disease
Alcohol abuse
NIDA Research
…To Managed Care
From Molecules…
…Drug Courts
…Community Coalitions
Your Brain on Drugs
1-2 Min 3-4 5-6
6-7 7-8 8-9
9-10 10-20 20-30
YELLOW shows
places in brain
where cocaine goes
(Striatum)
Front of brain
Back of brain
Advances in Science
Have Revolutionized Our
Fundamental Views of
Drug Abuse and Addiction
Drug Abuse Is A Preventable Behavior
Partnership for a Drug Free America
Drug Addiction Is A Treatable Disease
DRUGS
BRAIN MECHANISMS
BEHAVIOR
ENVIRONMENT
HISTORICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
- previous history- expectation- learning
- social interactions- stress- conditioned stimuli
- genetics- circadian rhythms- disease states- gender
PHYSIOLOGICAL
Drug Addiction:
A Complex Behavioral and Neurobiological Disorder
Community
Peer Cluster
Family
Individual
Drug Abuse Risk Factors
Drug Abuse
Drug/Alcohol Related Traffic Accidents
Delinquency
Academic Failure and DroppingOut of School
Juvenile Depression
Sexually Transmitted Diseases (Including HIV/AIDS)
Running Away From Home
Unwanted Pregnancies
Suicidal Behavior
Community
Peer Cluster
Family
Individual
Becomes Subordinate
IndividuallyHoused
GroupHoused
Morgan, D. et al. Nature Neuroscience, 5: 169-174, 2002.
**
S.003 .01 .03 .1
0
10
20
30
40
50
Cocaine (mg/kg/injection)
Dominant
Subordinate
Becomes Dominant
Isolation Can Change Neurobiology
Effects of a Social Stressor on Brain DA D2 Receptors and Propensity to Administer Drugs
We Know There’s ABig Genetic Contribution ToDrug Abuse and Addiction…
And the Nature of this ContributionIs Extremely Complex
Genes associated with Drug Abuse:
CYP2A6 tobacco dependenceFAAH (endogenous cannabinoid regulator) problem drug use
Mu-opioid receptior in heroin addiction
2.5
0
unpleasant response
pleasant response
DA Receptor Levels and Response to MP
Subjects with low receptor levels found MP pleasant while those with high levels found MP unpleasant
Biology/Genes Environment
DRUG
Addiction
Brain Mechanisms
ADDICTION INVOLVES MULTIPLE FACTORS
Brain Development
…the “Emotional” Brain vs. the “Reasoned” Brain
When reading emotion, teens (left) rely more on the
amygdala, while adults (right) rely more on the frontal cortex.
Deborah Yurgelon-Todd, 2000
Emotions
Giedd et al., 2001-2004
Yurgelun-Todd et al., 2000; 2004
Teens Adults
• Understanding drug abuse and addiction from a
Development Perspective has important implications
for their Prevention & Treatment
• Exposure to drugs of abuse during adolescence couldhave profound effects on Brain Development & Brain Plasticity
Why Do People Take Drugs In
The First Place?
People Take Drugs To:
Feel good (sensation seeking)
Feel better (self medication)
A Major Reason People Take
a Drug is They Like What
it Does to Their Brains
We Know That Despite
Their Many Differences, most
Abused Substances Enhance the
Dopamine and Serotonin Pathways
How do drugs work in the brain?
Dopamine Pathways
Functions
•reward (motivation)
•pleasure,euphoria
•motor function
(fine tuning)
•compulsion
•perserveration
Serotonin Pathways
Functions
•mood
•memory
processing
•sleep
•cognition
nucleus
accumbens
hippocampus
striatum
frontal
cortex
substantia
nigra/VTA
raphe
0
50
100
150
200
0 60 120 180
Time (min)
% o
f B
as
al D
A O
utp
ut
NAc shell
Empty
Box Feeding
Source: Di Chiara et al.
FOOD
100
150
200
DA
Co
nc
en
tra
tio
n (
% B
as
eli
ne
)
MountsIntromissionsEjaculations
15
0
5
10
Co
pu
latio
n F
req
uen
cy
Sample
Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
ScrScr
BasFemale 1 Present
ScrFemale 2 Present
Scr
Source: Fiorino and Phillips
SEX
Natural Rewards Elevate Dopamine Levels
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
0 1 2 3 4 5 hr
Time After Amphetamine
% o
f B
as
al R
ele
as
e
DADOPACHVA
Accumbens AMPHETAMINE
0
100
200
300
400
0 1 2 3 4 5 hrTime After Cocaine
% o
f B
as
al R
ele
as
e
DADOPACHVA
AccumbensCOCAINE
0
100
150
200
250
0 1 2 3 4 5hrTime After Morphine
% o
f B
as
al R
ele
as
e
Accumbens
0.51.02.510
Dose (mg/kg)
MORPHINE
0
100
150
200
250
0 1 2 3 hr
Time After Nicotine
% o
f B
as
al R
ele
as
e
AccumbensCaudate
NICOTINE
Source: Di Chiara and Imperato
Effects of Drugs on Dopamine Release
Prolonged Drug Use Changes
the Brain In Fundamental
and Long-Lasting Ways
Science Has Generated A Lot of
Evidence Showing That…
Dopamine D2 Receptors are Lower in Addiction
control addicted
Cocaine
Heroin
Alcohol
DA
DA
DA
DA DADA
DA
Reward Circuits
DADA DA
DA
DA
Reward Circuits
DA
DA
DA
DA DA
DA
Drug Abuser
Non-Drug Abuser
Amygdala
Anterior Cingulate
Nature Video Cocaine Video
CRAVING INDUCTION IN PET SETTING
N = 13
CR
AV
ING
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
Neutral Cocaine
STIMULI
Memories Appear to Be
A Critical Part of Addiction
Cocaine Film
Cocaine Craving:Population (Cocaine Users, Controls) x Film (cocaine, erotic)
Garavan et al A .J. Psych 2000
IFG
Ant Cing
Cingulate
Sig
nal In
ten
sit
y (
AU
)
Controls Cocaine Users
Cocaine Film
Erotic Film
Cocaine Craving:Population (Cocaine Users, Controls) x Film (cocaine, erotic)
Garavan et al A .J. Psych 2000
IFG
Ant Cing
Cingulate
Sig
nal In
ten
sit
y (
AU
)
Controls Cocaine Users
Drugs Are Usurping
Brain Circuits
and
Motivational Priorities
Dopamine Transporters in Methamphetamine Abusers
Methamphetamine abusers have significant reductions in dopamine transporters.
Normal Control
Methamphetamine Abuser p < 0.0002
Do
pa
min
e T
ran
sp
ort
ers
(Bm
ax/K
d)
Normal
Controls
Meth
Abusers
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
BNL - UCLA - SUNY
NIDA - ONDCP - DOE
Dopamine Transporters in Methamphetamine Abusers
BNL/UCLA/SUNY
NIDA, ONDCP, DOE
Motor Task
Loss of dopamine transporters
in the meth abusers may result
in slowing of motor reactions.
Memory TaskLoss of dopamine transporters
in the meth abusers may result
in memory impairment.
7 8 9 10 11 12 131.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Time Gait(seconds)
468101214161.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Delayed Recall(words remembered)
Do
pam
ine T
ran
sp
ort
er
Bm
ax/K
d
DAT Recovery
with prolonged
abstinence from
methamphetamine
Normal Control
Methamphetamine Abuser
(1 month detoxification)
Methamphetamine Abuser
(24 month abstinent)
[C-11]d-threo-methylphenidate
Source: Volkow, N.D. et al., Journal of Neuroscience, 21(23), pp. 9414-9418, December 1, 2001.
PFC
ACG
OFCSCC
Hipp
NAcc
VP
Amyg
REWARD
CONTROLINHIBITORY
CONTROL
MOTIVATION/DRIVE
MEMORY/LEARNING
Circuits Involved In Drug Abuse and Addiction
Control
Drive/
Motiva-
tion
Saliency/
Reward
Memory
STOP
Non Addicted Brain
Addicted Brain
Control
DriveSaliency
Memory
STOP
Non Addicted Brain
GO
Control
DriveSaliency
Memory
The Brains of Addicts
Are Different From
the Brains of Non-Addicts
…And Those Differences
Are An Essential Element
of Addiction
A Major Task for Drug Treatment is
Changing Brains Back!
Behaviorally
Pharmacologically
CONTROL
REWARD DRIVE
CONTROL
DRIVE
MEMORY
CONTROL
DRIVE
MEMORY
CONTROL
Strengthenfrontal control
MEMORY
Weaken learnedpositiveassociationswith drugsand drugcues
REWARD
Decreasethe rewardingvalue ofdrugs REWARD
Increase the rewarding valueof non-drugreinforcers
Treating the ADDICTED Brain
DRIVE
MEMORY
REWARD
Medications for Relapse Prevention
Addicted Brain
Drive
Control
Saliency
Memory
GO Strengthen prefrontal-striatal communication
Executive function/Inhibitory control
Interfere with conditioned memories (craving)
Teach new memories
Counteract stress responsesthat lead to relapse
Interfere with drug’sreinforcing effects
VaccinesEnzymatic degredationNaltrexoneDA D3 antagonistsCB1 antagonists
BiofeedbackModafinilBupropionStimulants
Antiepileptic GVGN-acetylcysteine
Cycloserine
CRF antagonistsOrexin antagonists
STOPDrive
Control
Memory
Non-Addicted Brain
Saliency AdenosineA2 antagonistsDA D3 antagonists
Treating A Brain Disease
Must Go Beyond Just
Fixing The Chemistry
We Need to Treat the
Whole Person!
The Most Effective Treatment
Strategies Will Attend to All Aspects
of Addiction:
• Biology
• Behavior
• Social Context
Components of Comprehensive Drug
Addiction Treatment
www.drugabuse.gov
We Have A Variety Of Effective
Treatment Options In The
Clinical Toolbox
Developing and Testing Addiction
Medications and Behavioral Therapies• More than 60 compounds are being tested as potential
treatments– Cocaine
– Opiates
– Methamphetamine
– Nicotine immunotherapies or vaccines
• Applying powerful new computerized drug development techniques
• Wide variety of behavioral treatments tested in variety of settings as stand-alone and as adjuncts to medications– Motivational incentives
– Aftercare
Some Behavioral Treatments with a Strong Science Base
• Behavioral Treatments for MJ Abuse
• Behavioral Treatments for Smoking Cessation
• Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment
• Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Therapies
• Complementary and Alternative Treatments
• Multisystemic Therapy
• Contingency Management Treatments*
• Dialectical Behavioral Therapy• Drug Counseling• Family Treatments• Group Behavior Therapy• HIV Risk Reduction• Motivational
Interviewing/Enhancement*• Seeking Safety (PTSD)• Work Therapy
PRE-CLINICAL
RESEARCH CLINICAL STUDIES NDA REVIEW POST-MARKETING
AVG: 18 MOS.
IND
AVG: 5 YEARS
NDA APPROVAL
DIS
CO
VE
RY
/SC
RE
EN
ING
SYNTHESIS
AND
PURIFICATION
ANIMAL
TESTING
AVG: 24 MOS.
ADVERSE
REACTION
SURVEILLANCE
PRODUCT DEFECT
REPORTING
SURVEYS/
SAMPLING
TESTING
POST APPROVAL
INSPECTIONS
SHORT-TERM
LONG-TERM
PHASE I
PHASE II
PHASE III PHASE IV
ACCELERATED APPROVAL
PARALLEL TRACK
TREATMENT USE
The Process of NEW DRUG DEVELOPMENTIs Long…and Expensive
ROADBLOCK #1: Lack of Pharmaceutical IndustryInterest in Developing Medications to Treat Addiction
Primary Care Physicians Are Often Reluctant To Treat Substance Abuse or Fail to Link This
With Their Patients’ Other Medical Conditions
ROADBLOCK #2: Erosion of the Medical Community’s Involvement in Preventing
and Treating Drug Abuse and Addiction
ADDICTION CONTRIBUTES TO MANY SERIOUS MEDICAL CONSEQUENCES
• Mental Illness
• Cancer
• Infectious Diseases
(HIV/HCV)
• Cardiac
• Pulmonary
• Learning Disorders
• Obesity
• Cerebrovascular
(strokes)
• Trauma
(accidents) Source: Fowler JS et al., PNAS. 2003;100(20):11600-5.
In 2007 An Estimated 22.3 Million Americans
Were Dependent On or AbusedAny Illicit Drugs or Alcohol
But…Only 3.9 Million (17%) of These Individuals
Had Received Some Type ofTreatment In the Past Year
Source: 2007 NSDUH, National Findings, SAMHSA, OAS, 2008.
Self Help Group
Outpatient Rehab
Inpatient Rehab
Outpatient Mental Health Center
Hospital Inpatient
Private Doctor’sOffice
Emergency Room
Prison or Jail
Numbers in Millions0 .5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
2.2
1.7
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.3
Location TX Received
ROADBLOCK #3: Although Treatments For Addiction Are Available, They Are Not
Being Widely Used By Those Who Need Them
Drug Addiction is a chronic illness that can
be treated as readily as hypertension,
diabetes and asthma
Findings from a study sponsored by:Physician Leadership on
National Drug Policy, March 1998
Relapse Rates Are Similar for Drug Dependence and
Other Chronic Illnesses
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Drug Dependence
Type I Diabetes
Hypertension Asthma
40
to
60
%
30
to
50
% 50
to
70
%
50
to
70
%
Source: McLellan, A.T. et al., JAMA, Vol 284(13), October 4, 2000.
Per
cen
t o
f P
ati
ents
Wh
o R
elap
se
0
2
4
6
8
10
Pre During Post
Treatment Research Institute
Outcome In Hypertension
0
2
4
6
8
10
Pre During Post
Treatment Research Institute
Outcome In Addiction
If we treat a diabetic and symptoms don’t
subside….what do we do?
Would we increase the dose?
Would we change medications?
Would we change treatment approaches?
Would we fail to provide ongoing
treatment for a diabetic?
For More Information
NIDA Public Information Office:
301-443-1124
Or
www.nida.nih.gov
www.drugabuse.gov
National Clearinghouse on Alcohol and
Drug Information (NCADI):
1-800-729-6686
www.drugabuse.gov
Healthy Heart Diseased Heart
Decreased Heart Metabolism in Heart Disease Patient
ADDICTION IS A DISEASE OF THE BRAINas other diseases it affects the tissue function
Control Cocaine Abuser
Decreased Brain Metabolism in Drug Abuse Patient
Sources: From the laboratories of Drs. N. Volkow and H. Schelbert
High
Low
Partial Recovery of Brain Dopamine Transportersin Methamphetamine (METH)
Abuser After Protracted Abstinence
Normal Control METH Abuser(1 month detox)
METH Abuser(24 months detox)
0
3
ml/gm
Source: Volkow, ND et al., Journal of Neuroscience 21, 9414-9418, 2001.
ADDICTION CAN BE TREATED
NIDA Screening and Treatment Resources
for Medical and Health Professionals
Overview
• Why screen for drug use in general medical settings?
• Website
• Demo of Online Screening Tool
• Quick Reference Guide
• Online Resource Guide
• Data from Review
• Press Conference
• Scientific Meeting
Why screen for drug use
in general medical settings?
• Drug use is harmful and has many adverse consequences?
– Cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, HIV/AIDS, anxiety, depression, sleep problems, as well as financial difficulties and legal, work, and family problems can all result from or be exacerbated by drug use.
• The use of illicit drugs is more common than you might think.
– In 2007, an estimated 20 million Americans aged 12 or older (~8.0 percent of the population) were current illicit drugs users.
– Nearly 1 in 5 Americans aged 18-25.
Why screen for drug use
in general medical settings?
• Only a fraction of individuals who need specialty treatment for drug or alcohol addiction receive it each year.
– In 2007, of the more than 23 million persons aged 12 or older who needed specialized treatment for a drug or alcohol problem, most—almost 21 million—did not receive it.
• Using screening and brief intervention (SBI) procedures in general medical settings can make a difference in drug use behaviors.
– Research has demonstrated that SBI can reduce alcohol and tobacco use.
– A growing body of literature suggests SBI can also reduce illicit and nonmedical prescription drug use as well.
Website and Online Tool Demo
Quick Reference Guide
Online Resource Guide
Online Resource Guide
• Introduction
– Why screen for drug use in general medical settings?
– How do you screen and provide feedback—the 5 As
• Before you begin screening patients
– Determine staffing roles and train staff
– Decide how screening results will be used
– Find reimbursement information for your state (SAMHSA website)
– Establish relationships and linkages with treatment providers
Online Resource Guide
• NIDA-Modified ASSIST Screening Tool—Step 1: ASK about drug use
– Introduce yourself and establish rapport (script)
– Ask patients about lifetime drug use using the Prescreen Question
– Begin the NIDA-Modified ASSIST
• Tobacco and Alcohol
– Score the full NIDA-Modified ASSIST
Online Resource Guide
• Conducting a Brief Intervention
– Step 2: ADVISE patient according to screening results
• Review screening results with patient
• Provide medical advice about the patient’s drug use
– Step 3: ASSESS the patient’s readiness to quit
– Step 4: ASSIST patient in making a change
– Step 5: ARRANGE specialty assessment, drug treatment, follow-up visit.
• Refer patients as appropriate
• Schedule a follow-up appointment
• Offer continuing support
Online Resource Guide
• Appendix 1 – Recommendations to address patient resistance
• Appendix 2 – Sample Progress Notes
• Appendix 3 – Change Plan Worksheet
• Appendix 4 – Biological Specimen Testing
• Appendix 5 – Additional Resources
• References
Reviewer Data
Review of Screening Tools
• Reviewers
– Researchers (9) who participated in May meeting to review original screening instrument + additional experts on brief intervention.
– Physician Consultant Group (24) – Practicing primary care physicians from around the country selected from the AMA’s Physician Master File dataset
• Review Form
– On a scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best), how would rate the materials on their accuracy, completeness, clarity, and resources?
Review of Screening Tools
0
2
4
6
8
10
Accurate Complete Clear and Comprehensible Resources Included
Physicians (n=24)
Researchers (n=9)
Review of Screening Tools
• Review Form (cont…)
– Do you think that the below listed items would be useful for primary care physicians and their practices?
• Resource Guide
• Web-based Screening Tool (in concept)
• PDF of Screening Tool
• Quick Reference Guide
Percent of Reviewers Who Felt
Materials Would Be Useful
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Resource Guide Web-based Tool PDF of Tool QRG
Physicians
Researchers
Review of Screening Tools
• Review Form – For Practicing Physicians Only
– Is the screening tool something that you would implement in your practice?
– Are the screening tool and accompanying materials something that you would recommend to colleagues?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No
Physicians Who Would Implement or Recommend NIDA
Screening Tools
Implement
Recommend