Network Centric Planning ---- Campaign of Experimentation Program of Research IAMWG Dr. David S....
-
Upload
charleen-singleton -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Network Centric Planning ---- Campaign of Experimentation Program of Research IAMWG Dr. David S....
Network Centric Planning----
Campaign of ExperimentationProgram of Research
IAMWG
Dr. David S. AlbertsSeptember 2005
Agenda
• Objectives• Planning in the Context of Command• C2 Approach Space • Initial Version of the Conceptual Model• Campaign Phases• Critical Path Items• Research Priorities
Objectives
• Propose a Campaign of Experimentation and an associated Program of Research to explore the nature of a planning approach that is suitable for Network Centric Operations
• Provide an initial formulation to serve as a point of departure– Objectives– Initial version of a Conceptual Model– Critical Path items– Priority research topics
Planning in the Context of Command
Command
Sensemaking
Planning
Execution(Actions (t))
Effects (t)
Plan (t)
Outcomes (t)
Dimensions of Command Approach Space(NATO SAS-050)
• Allocation of Decision Rights—The distribution of choices related to a particular topic under a set of circumstances or conditions disseminated to the international community, a society, an enterprise, or an organization.
• Patterns of Interactions Enabled—Establishing standards or protocols that facilitate the appropriate level and quality of communication, information exchange and collaboration required for success.
• Distribution of Information (Command)—The way information flows and is disseminated in the “real world” because of informal relationships, linkages and sources.
• Dynamics Across Purpose and Time– The location of an organization within the C2 approach space may differ
depending on the type of operation.– The period of engagement of an organization within the C2 approach space
may differ depending on the type of operation.
C2 Approach Space(SAS-050)
Distribution of Decision Rights
Distrib
ution
of
Infor
mation
Patte
rn o
f Int
erac
tion
Tight Control
Broad Dissemination
Peer to Peer
Fully Distributed
Unitary
Fully Hierarchal
Edge Organizations
Classic C2
Agenda
• Objectives• Planning in the Context of Command• C2 Approach Space • Initial Version of the Conceptual Model
– Planning Approach Space– Value View (Overview)– Process View
• Campaign Phases• Critical Path Items• Research Priorities
Planning Approach Space
nature of the process
Info
rmat
ion
diss
emin
atio
n
natur
e of th
e plan
hierarchical edge
post
/pul
l w/ c
olab
detai
led
inten
t
with
in c
hain
of c
md
traditionalbaseline
networkcentric
Measures of Merit for Planning
Command
Sensemaking
Planning
Execution(Actions (t))
Effects (t)
Plan (t)
Outcomes (t)
Quality of Command
Quality of Sensemaking
Quality of Planning
Plan QualityQuality of Execution
Value of Effects
Conceptual Model: Value View
Quality of Command
Quality of Sensemaking
Quality of Planning
Plan Quality
Quality of Execution
Value of Effects
Quality of Command
MCP Elements DOTMLP Value View
Approach to Command and Control
Quality of ControlDoctrine
OrganizationLeadership
Training Quality of TrainingTraining
Personnel Quality of PersonnelEducation
Quality of Sensemaking
Systems MaterialQuality of ISR
Quality of TransportQuality of
Information Services
Information Quality
Mission Effectiveness Mission EffectivenessMission Effectiveness
Quality of Execution
Force Agility
From Alberts and Hayes, Understanding C2, CCRP Publications, 2005
Functions of Command
command
social
cognitive
information
physical
• nature of interactions• resource allocation: personnel
• awareness of - intent, roles / responsibilities - rules /constraints
• resource allocation: information assets• resource allocation: information access• information sharing
• resource allocation: material
From Alberts and Hayes, Understanding C2, CCRP Publications, 2005
Network Centric Hypotheses
Information Sharing and
Collaboration
Quality of information and
Shared Situational Awarenessenhances
A robustly networked force Information Sharingimproves
Shared situational awareness enablesCollaboration
andSelf-synchronization
These, in turn, dramatically increase mission effectiveness
Informationavailable
perceptions
access toinformation
mentalmodels individual
awarenessunderstanding
predictiondecisions
Information Domain
collaborationcapabilities
Cognitive Domain Social Domain
interactions
expressionsof intent
sharedawareness
understandingpredictiondecisions
to actions
access tocollaboration
From Alberts and Hayes, Understanding C2, CCRP Publications, 2005
Sensemaking
A robustly networked force Information Sharingimproves
Informationavailable
perceptions
access toinformation
mentalmodels individual
awarenessunderstanding
predictiondecisions
Information Domain
collaborationcapabilities
Cognitive Domain Social Domain
interactions
expressionsof intent
sharedawareness
understandingpredictiondecisions
to actions
access tocollaboration
From Alberts and Hayes, Understanding C2, CCRP Publications, 2005
information sharing
Informationavailable
perceptions
access toinformation
mentalmodels individual
awarenessunderstanding
predictiondecisions
Information Domain
collaborationcapabilities
Cognitive Domain Social Domain
interactions
expressionsof intent
sharedawareness
understandingpredictiondecisions
to actions
access tocollaboration
From Alberts and Hayes, Understanding C2, CCRP Publications, 2005
Information Sharing and
Collaboration
Quality of information and
Shared Situational Awarenessenhances
information sharing
information quality
Informationavailable
perceptions
access toinformation
mentalmodels individual
awarenessunderstanding
predictiondecisions
Information Domain
collaborationcapabilities
Cognitive Domain Social Domain
interactions
expressionsof intent
sharedawareness
understandingpredictiondecisions
to actions
access tocollaboration
From Alberts and Hayes, Understanding C2, CCRP Publications, 2005
Shared situational awareness enablesCollaboration
andSelf-synchronization
synchronizedactions
Planning and Execution
Intent
Entities
Information
Plan / Decisions
Actions
Effects
Entities
Entities
Entities
Information
Plan / Decisions
interactions
planning
execution
interactions
InformationSharing
AwarenessUnderstanding
AwarenessUnderstanding
SharedAwareness
Understanding
SharedAwareness
Understanding
Agenda
• Objectives• Planning in the Context of Command• C2 Approach Space • Initial Version of the Conceptual Model• Campaign Phases
– Concept Phase– Refinement Phase
• Critical Path Items• Research Priorities
Concept Phase
Assess theConceptual
Model
CharacterizeApproaches
Formula
tion P
hase
ConceptualModel
Initial Version
IdentifyCandidatePlanning
Approaches
DevelopWorkingModel(s)
DevelopMetrics /
Instruments
AssessApproaches
(analyses & experiments)
ConceptualModel
(revised & updated)
PromisingApproaches
to refinement phase
ResearchPriorities
to Program of Research
Refinement Phase
Synthesis
Conce
pt Pha
se
ConceptualModel
(revised & updated)
PromisingApproaches
to demonstrationphase
ResearchPriorities
to Program of Research
ModelExperimentAnalysis
Analysis
Analysis
AnalysisModel
Model Model Experiment
ExperimentExperiment
Experiment
ExperimentPlanning Approach #1
Planning Approach #N
Planning Approach #2Model
ExperimentAnalysis
Analysis
Analysis
AnalysisModel
Model Model Experiment
ExperimentExperiment
Experiment
Experiment
ExperimentAnalysis
Analysis
AnalysisModel
Model Model Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
ExperimentModel
PromisingApproaches
(revised)
ExperimentAnalysis
Analysis
AnalysisModel
Model Model Experiment
ExperimentExperiment
Experiment
Experiment
Research Findings
Agenda
• Objectives• Planning in the Context of
Command• C2 Approach Space • Initial Version of the
Conceptual Model• Campaign Phases• Critical Path Items• Research Priorities
Developing Synergies
possibilitiesC2 State
of the Practice
UnderstandingCommand
Control
C2 State of the
Art
AnalysisState of the
Practice
State of the Practice
Measurement
knowledgepossibilities
ideas
requirements
metrics
data datarequirements
knowled
ge focus
data
dataExperimentsState of the
Practice
focus
data
ideas
Critical Path
• Getting measurement right– Meta-data– Relevance of metrics– Appropriateness of instruments– Conditions under which data is collected
• Initial Conceptual Model• Understand and adopt CoBPs• Establish portal for data, findings, and instrumentation
Research Priorities
• Influenced by the Results of Experiments and Analyses• A Priori High Priority Topics
– Taxonomy of Planning and Plans– Quality metrics for planning and plans– Factors that influence Planning Quality– Factors that influence Plan Quality– Impact of Planning and Plan Quality on Operations– Methods and Tools for Planning– Plan Visualization