Negotiating the Tension between DAP & Skills-Based Instruction in Kindergarten

Negotiating the Tension between DAP & Skills-Based Instruction in

Kindergarten

Sister Mary Karen Oudeans, Ph.D.

Silver Lake College, Manitowoc, WI

Ben Ditkowsky, Ph.D.

Educational Consultant, Chicago, IL

What is Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)?

DAP is based on the assumptions that children can develop without specific intervention and that to provide specific intervention may, in fact, be detrimental to development.

DAP is based on the conviction that – Early educational experiences and environments are

important.– Classroom practices following DAP guidelines enhance

children’s development and facilitate learning.– Superior academic benefits result from DAP practices

A few DAP Research Citations

Bredekamp & Rosegrant, 1992 Bredekamp & Copple, 1997 Carta, Atwater, Schwartz, & McConnell, 1993 Dunn, Beach, Kontos, 1994 Hyson, Hirsh-Pasek, Rescola, 1990 Kostelnik, 1992 Sherman, Mueller, 1996 Stipek, Feiler, Daniels, Milburn, 1995

DAP Principles

Age appropriateness and individualization Student readiness

– Teaching in the Zone of Proximal Development

Integration of curriculum & assessment Importance of active engagement

c. f. Carta, Atwater, Schwartz, & McConnell, 1993

Misinterpretations of DAP

DAP does not mean teachers don’t teach and the children control the classroom.

Classrooms where teachers abdicate responsibility for instruction are NOT developmentally appropriate.

Good (DAP) early childhood programs are, – Highly organized and – Highly structured environments – Where teachers have carefully prepared – Where teachers are in control(e. g. Bredekamp & Rosegrant, 1992; Kostelnik, 1992)

Statements of NAEYC & IRA regarding Reading & DAP (1998)

Learning to read and write is a complex, multifaceted process that requires a wide variety of instructional approaches.

A DAP model of literacy learning and development is an interactive process.

Statements of NYEAC & IRA regarding DAP

Believes that-- Goals and expectations for young

children’s achievement in reading and writing should be developmentally appropriate, that is, challenging but achievable, with sufficient adult support.

NAEYC Expectations for Teachers

Early Childhood Teachers need to understand and be skilled in – The developmental continuum of reading & writing– A variety of strategies to assess and support

individual children.– Setting appropriate literacy goals – Adapting instructional strategies

NAEYC Expects Teachers to:

Frequently read interesting and conceptually rich stories to children

Provide daily opportunities for children to write Help children build a sight vocabulary Create a literacy-rich environment for children to

engage independently in reading & writing

NAEYC Goal for Kindergarten:

Children develop basic concepts of print and begin to engage in and experiment with reading and writing

Some Key Early Reading Syntheses

Adams. M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge,MA: The MIT Press.

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Also available on the internet

http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm

What We Know From This Research

Children who are at risk of reading disability can be identified as early as kindergarten (Torgesen, Wagner, Rashotte,

Alexander, & Conway, 1997), and early intervention is the key.

Kindergarten teachers have a brief window to intervene to prevent an escalating pattern of failure.

Overall, to change outcomes, we must provide the highest quality instruction available as early as possible.

The critical time for instruction = Kindergarten!

Kindergarten Instructional Targets

Phonological Awareness. – The awareness and understanding of the sound structure of our

language, that “cat” is composed of the sounds /k/ /a/ /t/. Alphabetic Principle. Based on two parts:

– Alphabetic Understanding. Words are composed of letters that represent sounds, and

– Phonological Recoding. Systematically identifying a letter sound and blending the sounds together to retrieve the pronunciation of an unknown printed string or to spell.

Automaticity = Fluency– The ability to translate letters-to-sounds-to-words fluently and

effortlessly

What should kids be able to DO by the end of kindergarten that is most predictive of Success in Reading. 1. Blending

– Orally blend onset-rime (m - ilk) 2 - 3 separately spoken phonemes into one syllable words.

(m-e : me . f - u - n : fun.)

2. Segmentation– Identify the first sound in a 1 syllable word

( bug begins with the sound /b/)– Say the individual sounds in 2 to 3 phoneme 1 syllable words

(/c/ /a/ /t/)

Teaching BIG Ideas in Alphabetic Understanding in kindergarten

Teach letter & sound blending, segmenting Scaffold the Instruction

– read and practice first in isolation... then in words... then in connected text

– begin with most common, high frequency sounds and words

– teach one item at a time with intensive practice, ... then continue cumulative and distributed practice daily

What should kids be able to DO by the end of kindergarten?

Letter - Sound correspondence Identify letters by sound Say the most common sound for letters

Decoding Blend sounds of letters to READ short words

Sight-word reading Recognize common sight words

– (e.g. a, I, is, the, my you, of, are)

Alphabetic Understanding Research Conclusions

Letter-sound knowledge is prerequisite to effective word identification. The primary

difference between good and poor readers is the ability to use letter-sound correspondence to identify words.

Students who acquire and apply alphabetic understanding early in their reading careers reap long-term benefits.

Teaching students to listen, remember, and process the letter-sound correspondence in words is a difficult, demanding, yet achievable goal with long lasting effects.

Alphabetic Understanding Research Conclusions

Combining instruction in phonological awareness and letter-sounds appears to be the most favorable for successful early reading.

A whole word strategy, by itself, has limited utility in an orthography based on an alphabet.

Awareness of the relation between sounds and their corresponding printed letter can be taught.

So-- The “pressure” is on!

Kindergarten outcomes contribute substantially to first grade reading outcomes.

By focusing on early literacy skills and attaining established phonological awareness in kindergarten, the likelihood of successful reading outcomes increases.

For students with a deficit in phonological awareness in kindergarten, reading difficulty and reading failure are likely - unless skills are remediated early.

It is critical for kindergarten reading instruction to make explicit the connections between print and the sounds of spoken language.

How we teach the two component skills of letter-sounds and phonological blending and segmenting is as important to children’s progress in becoming readers as what we teach.

We know from previous research

Key Questions

If traditional DAP kindergarten teachers implement a structured, teacher-directed set of instructional lessons will students meet key instructional benchmarks?

If kids are successful, will teachers “buy into” the more structured approach?

Will the size of the group make a difference – whole group instruction (13 –15 children), – small group, (6 or fewer children)

Teacher Participants

Teachers self-selected to participate:

2 teachers in same district

1 teacher from K-5 school in neighboring district

1 teacher volunteered as Control.

– She allowed us to assess her students but felt her children were learning what was necessary to meet kindergarten benchmarks.

School A

Intervention group (Whole class instruction) N = 39 children am / pm Kindergarten (2 teachers)

– 15 minutes of explicit instructional lessons along with early literacy DAP instruction

Control group (Traditional Kindergarten) N = 26 children in am. / pm (1 teacher)

– Used early literacy program based on DAP guidelines

School B

Intervention group (small group instruction)22 children in am / pm kindergarten (2 teachers)

– 15 minutes of explicit instructional lessons along with early literacy DAP instruction

– (5 to 6 children in each group)

Difference from School A:Children divided into 2 groups, 6 children each. 15-minute lessons taught by classroom teacher & Title 1 teacher.

Teachers’ Philosophy Statements

• “I think children learn best by exploring & experiencing many different things in our curriculum, My role should be to set up the activities so the children learn by doing.”

• “My job…is to take each child from the level they are at when they come into kindergarten and help them reach their highest potential.”

• “My philosophy generally is to accept children at their current point in development & progress them according to their ability.”

Teachers’ Philosophy Statements

• “My job is to develop the child’s natural curiosity and desire to learn through the provision of meaningful, interesting & age appropriate experiences.”

• “I believe children learn best through meaningful hands on experiences which allow them to interact with objects, materials, and people in their environment.

• “The role of the teacher is to systematically model, teach, and design learning situations in which the students learn concepts, skills, and ideas, using a variety of ways…through explicit, implicit, actual hands on experiential instruction. The method of delivery depends on the students and how they learn best.”

Types of Literacy Activities in DAP Classrooms

Memorizing letter names & sounds Rhyming games 6-trait writing lessons Phonemic awareness activities that stress variety of

skills Phonics lessons focusing on individual letters &

sounds and how to blend them Shared reading & writing experiences Independent writing experiences based on real life

experiences

Assessment Targets and Age Range

Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) were developed by Good and Associates at the University of Oregon to measure and monitor student outcomes of key instructional targets in beginning reading.

KindergartenPreschool

Onset RF

Phoneme Segmentation Fluency

Letter Naming Fluency

Nonsense-w ord Fluency

CBM Reading G1

CBM Reading G2

First Grade Second G radeSpF W SpF W SpF W SpF W

Initial Sound

Assessment Targetsand Age Range


Onset RF




CBM Reading G1

CBM Reading G2


Initial Sound

Initial Sound Fluency measures a child’s ability to say the initial sound of a spoken word



Onset RF




CBM Reading G1

CBM Reading G2


Initial Sound

Phonemic Segmentation Fluency measures a child’s ability to say all of the sounds in a spoken word



Onset RF




CBM Reading G1

CBM Reading G2


Initial Sound

Nonsense Word Fluency measures a child’s ability to say the sounds in; or read “make-believe” words

Initial Sound Fluency (ISF)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

October

Initial Sound Fluency

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

November


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

End of January


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

March / April


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

End of May


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

We can see that intervention makes a difference for ISF.

But ISF is not a goal in and of itself.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Wo

rds

re

ad

pe

r m

inu

te

RVCRVTX

TRTX

PSF

May / June

Initial Sound Fluency and Phoneme Segmentation Fluency

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Wo

rds

re

ad

pe

r m

inu

te

RVCRVTX

TRTX

PSF

May / June

ISF corresponds with PSF In general:

– Children who scored higher in ISF scored higher in PSF as well.

– Children who scored lower in ISF scored lower in PSF as well.


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

Phonemic Segmentation Fluency (PSF)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX


We can see that intervention makes a difference for PSF.

But PSF is not a goal in and of itself.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Session

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Wo

rds

re

ad

pe

r m

inu

te

RVCRVTX

TRTX

NWF

Phonemic Segmentation Fluency and Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

RVCRVTX

TRTX

NWF

PSF corresponds with NWF In general:

– Children who scored higher in PSF scored higher in NWF as well.

– Children who scored lower in PSF scored lower in NWF as well.

Phonemic Segmentation Fluency and Nonsense Word Fluency

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Session

So

un

ds

read

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Session

So

un

ds

read

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX


-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Session

So

un

ds

read

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX


Small Group = 7 sounds per session

Whole Class = 6 sounds per session

DAP = 3 sounds per session

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Session

So

un

ds

read

per

min

ute


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Session

So

un

ds

read

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

We can see that intervention makes a difference for NWF.

But is NWF measuring how well kids can decode real words ?


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Session

So

un

ds

read

per

min

ute

RVTX

RVC

TRTX

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Wo

rds

re

ad

pe

r m

inu

te

RVCRVTX

TRTX

Wd Rdg Gen

2

5

15

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Wo

rds

re

ad

pe

r m

inu

te

RVCRVTX

TRTX

Word Reading Generalization

2

5

15

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Wo

rds

re

ad

pe

r m

inu

te

RVCRVTX

TRTX


How many untrained words should a kindergarten student read in a minute?

The DAP answer is: – As many as they can.

How many words can they read?

2

5

15

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Wo

rds

re

ad

pe

r m

inu

te

RVCRVTX

TRTX


Using a structured program does not look like it is detrimental to academic development in fact, it appears to facilitate early reading ability!

What does this mean for individual Children?

Remember DAP Guidelines for teaching Age appropriateness and individualization Student readiness

– Teaching in the Zone of Proximal Development

Integration of curriculum & assessment Importance of active engagement

Control Group: Typical predicted non - readers (based on ISF)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

Session For PSF Assessment

Based on ISF in October of Kindergarten we predicted these students in the DAP classroom would not be able to read

Control Group: Typical predicted non - readers (based on ISF)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

0123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

1 2

Student

Wd Rdg Gen


…and in May,

(Children with Low ISF in October) couldn’t read words like:

mop, him, run…

Control Group: Typical predicted readers (based on ISF)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute


Based on ISF in October of Kindergarten we predicted these students in the DAP classroom would be able to read


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

0123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

1 2

Student

Wd Rdg Gen


And in May, they read an average of about 4 or 5 words per minute.


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute


Based on ISF in October of Kindergarten we predicted these students in the DAP classroom would be able to read


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

0123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

1 2

Student

Wd Rdg Gen


They had the skill in

segmentation

Does DAP meet individuals at the Zone of Proximal Development?

They could not read,

even though they were

ready to read!

Intervention Whole Class: Predicted Non Readers (based on ISF)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF 1PSF 2PSF 3PSF 4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

0123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

1 2

Student

Wd Rdg GenBased on ISF in October of Kindergarten we predicted these students in the WHOLE CLASS Intervention Classroom would NOT be able to read

Intervention Whole Class: Predicted Non Readers (based on ISF)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF 1PSF 2PSF 3PSF 4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

0123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

1 2

Student

Wd Rdg Gen

CAN whole group instruction meet kids at the Zone of Proximal Development?

Intervention Whole Class: Predicted Readers (based on ISF)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

0123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

1 2

Student

Wd Rdg Gen


Based on ISF in October of Kindergarten we predicted these students in the WHOLE CLASS Intervention Classroom would be able to read

Intervention Small Group: Predicted Non Readers (based on ISF)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute


Based on ISF in October of Kindergarten we predicted these students in the Small Group Intervention Classroom would NOT be able to read

3 of 4 children made it to criterion levels on PSF


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

0123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

1 2 3 4

Student

Wd Rdg Gen



0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

0123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

1 2 3 4

Student

Wd Rdg Gen


Can small group instruction meet children at the ZPD?

Intervention Small Group: Predicted Readers (based on ISF)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0PSF

1PSF

2PSF

3PSF

4PSF

Ph

on

emes

per

min

ute

0123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132

Wo

rds

read

per

min

ute

1 2

Student

Wd Rdg Gen

Note the scale difference


October ISF predicted reading and…

By May they could read.

Basic Components of Lesson Sequence

Activity 1: Letter Names and Sounds Sequence: a, m, t, s, i, f, d, r, o, p, n, l, c, b, u, g,

h, x, e, v, j, w, k, y, z, q The more useful letters are introduced first. The most common sound is taught Letter names and sounds are introduced

simultaneously. “The name of this letter is __. The sound for this letter is /----/.”


Activity 2: Phonemic Blending & Segmenting

• auditory blending and segmenting

• separate activities within the same lesson

•combined after children are able to segment words correctly into individual sounds

• 4 - 6 words are used in each instructional cycle.

• Words contain sounds that were taught previously or will be taught in the following cycle (e.g., am, mat, sam)


Activity 3: Strategic Integration

• only words that children have been taught to blend and segment in earlier cycles.

• a blank tiles represent a phoneme when the letter name and sound is first introduced.

• manipulative letters are used after the letter name and sound are taught & reviewed.

• Word Cards replace letter cards.

Instructional Design Features

• Carefully sequenced examples, practice, corrective feedback, and review

• Clear, unambiguous strategies for teaching phonological blending & segmenting skills, letter names & sounds

• Clear, unambiguous strategies for making explicit connections between the sounds in words and letters in words

Answers and Directions

If traditional DAP kindergarten teachers implement a structured, teacher-directed set of instructional lessons will students meet key instructional benchmarks?

YesBut teacher effectiveness depends

on teacher knowledge and skill.

Answers and DirectionsIf kids are successful, will teachers “buy into” the more structured

approach?

Not necessarily, even when presented with increased student performance teacher reports vary.

T1: “It is hard for me to follow a set list of words…Explicit instruction is necessary but 15 minutes is too much” [will not repeat the program]

T2: “I will use parts but not on a continuous basis”T3: “At first the children did not like reading… hard for them to

concentrate… it taught them a system to use when [reading]… as they learned to read their attitude changed toward [ the program]”

Answers and Directions

Will the size of the group make a difference – whole group instruction (13 –15 children), – small group, (6 or fewer children)

Yes, statistically and educationally significant

differences on multiple indicators.

No Child Left Behind Education Act 2001

• Commitment to “every child can read by the end of third grade”

• Focus is on scientifically based early reading interventions and achieving results for all children

• Schools, districts that fail to make adequate yearly progress toward statewide proficiency goals subject to improvement, corrective action plans to get “them back on course.”

• Key words—prevention, early identification, and early intervention

Implications for instruction

Balance can work– Structured, carefully sequenced instruction in key

target areas results in higher gains, than attempts to catch kids at their individual ZPD with DAP instruction alone.

– Use connected, decodable text facilitates early word reading.

– Print rich environments, and interesting stories to can facilitate the development of oral language and comprehension.

Negotiating the Tension between DAP & Skills-Based Instruction in Kindergarten

Documents

Transcript of Negotiating the Tension between DAP & Skills-Based Instruction in Kindergarten