Nebraska Silver Jackets Risk Communication...Dec 12, 2013 · Webinar December 12, 2013. ... JEO...
Transcript of Nebraska Silver Jackets Risk Communication...Dec 12, 2013 · Webinar December 12, 2013. ... JEO...
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®
Nebraska Silver Jackets Risk Communication
Eileen L Williamson Public Affairs Specialist, Omaha District
Crystal K Lesmeister PE CFM Hydraulic Engineer, Nebraska Department of Natural Resources
Lori Laster CFM Project Manager, Papio Missouri River Natural Resource District Chair, Nebraska Floodplain and Stormwater Managers Association
Tony D Krause PE CFM Hydraulic Engineer, Omaha District
Webinar December 12, 2013
BUILDING STRONG®
Overview Risk Communication
►Communication Models ►Problems with Flood Risk Communication
NE Silver Jackets Flood Risk Communication Webtool Levee Safety Outreach Effort
BUILDING STRONG®
Risk Communication
Objective: Build Resiliency through Risk Informed Decisions
Risk communication is the exchange of information about hazards and risks leading to a better understanding of the risks and better risk management decisions. Risk communication ensures that the decision makers, other stakeholders and affected parties understand and appreciate the process of risk assessment and in so doing can be fully engaged in and responsible for risk management.
BUILDING STRONG®
Risk Communication
Objective: Build Resiliency through Risk Informed Decisions
Risk communication is the exchange of information about hazards and risks leading to a better understanding of the risks and better risk management decisions. Risk communication ensures that the decision makers, other stakeholders and affected parties understand and appreciate the process of risk assessment and in so doing can be fully engaged in and responsible for risk management.
1. Action Oriented 2. Directed to Decision Maker 3. Requires Engaged Participation
BUILDING STRONG®
Communication Model (Ideal Case)
BUILDING STRONG®
4 Keys to Communication
Communication Environment Defined Objective Organized Message Know the Audience
BUILDING STRONG®
Problems with Risk Communication (Recognizing the Environment)
Communication Environment ► The message must be tailored to the environment ► Communication environments include
• Face to face • Flyer/bulletin • Email • Internet • TV • etc
► All environments provide “noise” that impact the message
Pros and Cons on the Internet Environment ► Pro - Always on ► Pro - Interactive ► Con - Many Distractions (emails, links and more links, you-tube, facebook) ► Con - Limited Feedback
NOISE
BUILDING STRONG®
Problems with Risk Communication (Recognizing the Environment)
BUILDING STRONG®
Problems with Risk Communication (No Organized Message/No Defined Objective)
Flood Risk is a Shared Responsibility Multiple agencies are involved with Risk Communication Each agency has communication tailored to their responsibilities and objectives Each agency is communicating LOUDLY - AT THE SAME TIME - ALL THE TIME No Organized Message – Multiple Objectives
BUILDING STRONG®
Problems with Risk Communication (No Organized Message/No Defined Objective)
BUILDING STRONG®
Problems with Risk Communication (Understanding the Audience)
Prospect Theory -Kahneman, Tversky
Gamblers Fallacy -Greg Barron
Black Swan -Nassim Nicholas Taleb
HILF -Gordon Graham
Tails Event
Description vs Experience (Analytic vs Experimental) -We are more comfortable making decisions on experience, with low frequency events we
often don’t have experience - Outside of a risk management process, descriptive information (numbers) is not well
understood (Message to the public must be tailored so they can understand it) ► Sites Tailored to Public Audience
► The Great Flood of 1913 – 100 years later • Illinois Silver Jackets – Focus on 1913
flood • http://mrcc.isws.illinois.edu/1913Flood
► Floodsmart.gov • Great Visuals • Great Personalization • NFIP objective
BUILDING STRONG®
Problems with Risk Communication (Understanding the Audience)
I Give Up
BUILDING STRONG®
Improving Risk Communication
•Communication Environment •Reshape Commutation Model to Work with the Environment •Make interactive •Provide Feedback Loop •Provide Contact Info
•Defined Objective •Clearly State the Objective / Purpose
•Organized Message •Categorize Information •Provide Sign Posting
•Know the Audience •Personalize (Personal Risk = Personal Consequence = Personal Responsibility) •Visuals/Graphics •Appropriate Information at the Appropriate Time
BUILDING STRONG®
Communication Model Revised Model
BUILDING STRONG®
Risk Communication Webtool http://floods.dnr.ne.gov/
15
BUILDING STRONG® 16
•Defined Objective •Clearly State the Objective / Purpose
•Organized Message •Categorize Information •Sign Posting
BUILDING STRONG® 17
•Appropriate Information at the Appropriate Time
Sections are setup for •Risk mitigation – outside of ongoing event •Preparing for a eminent threat •During a flood •Recovering after a flood
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach Collaborative approach with
► Nebraska Floodplain and Stormwater Managers Association (NeFMSA)
► USACE ► FEMA ► Papio Missouri River NRD ► Nebraska Department of Natural
Resources ► JEO Consulting
One day face to face educational opportunity Organized linear message on levee safety
BUILDING STRONG®
Communication Related to Levees – From a Levee Sponsors Perspective
Rarely are all parties involved with levee safety and risk reduction in the same room at the same time.
Many times information is only communicated as issues arise and the local sponsor may not be aware of all responsibilities and expectations. They also may not be aware of responsibilities of other agencies involved.
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach Issues with current communication methods Multiple, dispersed sponsors make it challenging to provide a comprehensive message in a timely, budget friendly, manner.
Most communication with levee sponsors occurs in the field, not in a seminar setting, which limits the capability to communicate key points. Most communication occurs in relation to annual or periodic USACE inspections, or in relation to NFIP certification/accreditation which focuses conversation and communication toward these issues and does not provide insight into the larger understanding of flood risk and/or risk informed decision making
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach typical communications
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach the shared responsibility
BUILDING STRONG®
The Role of ASFPM/NeFSMA Nebraska Floodplain and Stormwater Managers
Association (NeFSMA) – NE state chapter of Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM).
Mission is to provide education to Nebraska’s professional about issues facing communities in stormwater and floodplain regulations.
Training provided to our members is comprehensive – no focus on one particular agency or topic
BUILDING STRONG®
How Can ASFPM/NeFSMA be a Resource
NeFSMA Annual Conference – Many stakeholders across Nebraska and neighboring states traveling to attend conference
NeFSMA often partners with other agencies and groups to offer training opportunities. ► Shared resources keeps costs low ► Cross-promotion can reach a wider audience
As a non-profit, NeFSMA can often help to pay for meeting expenses and incidental that can not be provided by federal agencies (food, conference space, etc.)
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach Multiple, dispersed sponsors make it challenging to provide a comprehensive message in a timely, budget friendly, manner. Bring together multiple sponsors in a single session -Outreach held at same location as the Annual NeFSMA conference -CEC provided
Most communication with levee sponsors occurs in the field, not in a seminar setting, which limits the capability to communicate key points. Session held in a classroom setting Most communication occurs in relation to annual or periodic USACE inspections, or in relation to NFIP certification/accreditation which focuses conversation and communication toward these issues and does not provide insight into the larger understanding of flood risk and/or risk informed decision making. Collaborative message provided in a comprehensive linear format
BUILDING STRONG®
Communication Model Revised Model
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach Attendance: Anticipated 20 – Actual attendance 69
► 6 States ► 13 Levee Districts ► Most attendees from local or regional governments or consultants
Advertised to: ► PL 84-99 participants ► NeFSMA ► NFIP Floodplain administrators ► County Emergency Managers
Attendance cost = $FREE Continuing Education Credits – 6 hours
► Preapproved through ASFPM
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach Setting Nebraska Army National Guard Armory
► This was the only available federal facility large enough in the area of the Nebraska City
► Conference restrictions prevented us from holding this at the more comfortable Lied Lodge
Held on Drill Floor
► Lack of Air Conditioning ► Audio Visuals were not ideal
…..except during July
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach Linear Message – Key Take Always Introductions and Risk Definition Risk Management is a Shared Responsibility Risk = Probability x Consequence Risk treatments include:
► Risk Acceptance ► Risk Transfer ► Risk Reduction – Structural or Nonstructural
Monitoring and Assessing Risk with Levees Identify Levee Failure Modes and link with inspection items What is the NLD What is the difference between Annual and Periodic Inspections What is the difference between inspections and LSAC
Risk Treatments Identify and discuss risk treatment through the NFIP,
structural mitigation, and nonstructural mitigation
Common Hurdles Provide resources to assist with overcoming financial, real-estate, or technical issues
Build a Common Language
Build a Common Understanding
Build a Common Objective/Vision
Provide Resources
•Who is involved •What is Risk •What is Mitigation •etc
How do we recognize risk How do we make decisions
How can we improve Risk
Narrative Hook – lots of pictures
What resources can help
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach Linear Message Introductions and Risk Definition 9:00-9:20 Introductions and the Shared Responsibility of Flood Risk 9:20-9:50 Concept of Risk and Risk Management
Monitoring and Assessing Risk with Levees 9:50-10:35 Levee Failure Modes and their links to inspection criteria 10:35-11:05 USACE Levee Safety Program
Risk Treatments 11:05-11:50 Mitigation through Transfer and the NFIP 11:50-12:00 USACE and Levee Safety Evaluations for the NFIP 1:30–2:00 Structural Risk Reduction 2:00-2:30 Nonstructural Risk Reduction
Common Hurdles 2:30-3:00 Financial Costs 3:00-3:30 Real Estate Requirements 3:30-4:00 Technical and Multiple Agency Coordination and A&E perspective
Course binder and data CD provided to all participants
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach Binder and Data CD Binder includes all presentations Resources and Factsheets
► FEMA handouts ► USACE handouts
• Various guidance documents • Non-Federal Sponsor Guide to
Land Acquisition Written as a part of this outreach 66 pages providing procedure, templates,
form letters, etc relating to real-estate processes
► USGS reports ► ASCE So you Live Behind a Levee
BUILDING STRONG®
Documenting Outcome Pre and Post testing
► Tested before and after the training on the following concepts: • Risk Concepts and Risk Drivers • Levee Processes (NLD/AI/PI/LSAC/Certification) • Timeline of Levee Safety • Risk Treatment Methods
The average performance on the pretest was 65% The average performance on the post test was 80%
► Largest improvement was in Risk Treatment Methods ► Second largest improvement was in Levee Processes
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Safety Outreach Course Evaluation Feedback for each presentation – less valuable (1), valuable (2), more valuable (3) Overall Score 2.35 Highest Ranking Presentations
► Levee Failure Modes and their links to inspection criteria ► USACE Levee Safety Program ► Mitigation through Transfer and the NFIP ► Nonstructural Risk Reduction ► Concept of Risk and Risk Management
The evaluation also asked feedback on a scale of 1-5 on:
► Presenters and handouts (organization, legibility, sequencing) - Average Score 4.5 ► Course Contents– Average Score: 4.4
• Would you recommend course to others? – Average Score: 4.4 • Course contributed to my knowledge and skills – Average Score: 4.4
► Atmosphere and AV- Average Score 2.9
BUILDING STRONG®
Recap Risk Communication
Communication Models Problems with Flood Risk Communication
NE Silver Jackets Flood Risk Communication Webtool Levee Safety Outreach Effort
BUILDING STRONG®
Available Resources on Silver Jackets Sharepoint
-Webtool files – build a tool custom to YOUR STATE !!!! -Levee Outreach: Project Summary, AAR, Working Files, etc
http://www.nfrmp.us/state/factNebraska.cfm
BUILDING STRONG®
Levee Outreach -Get a copy of the Binder -Build a Similar Training Opportunity
Communication Webtool -Check it out -Use it in your communication -Build one custom to your state
BUILDING STRONG®
Questions?
Crystal Lesmeister PE CFM Hydraulic Engineer, Nebraska DNR
Lori Laster CFM Project Manager with Papio Missouri River Natural Resource District and Chair of Nebraska Floodplain and Stormwater Managers Association
USACE Ohama District
Tony D Krause PE CFM Hydraulic Engineer
Eileen L Williamson Public Affairs Specialist
Questions
For post-webinar follow-up, you are welcome to email:
Lori Laster at [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]