Near-Term Economic Outlook of the Euro-Area and Asia: … OECD Singapore.pdf · 2010=100) (percent)...

25
1 Francisco G. Dakila, Jr. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Near-Term Economic Outlook of the Euro-Area and Asia: Prospects for the Euro-area Economies and Macroeconomic Implications for the ASEAN+3 Economies 26 September 2012 OECD Development Centre-AMRO Joint Asian Regional Roundtable

Transcript of Near-Term Economic Outlook of the Euro-Area and Asia: … OECD Singapore.pdf · 2010=100) (percent)...

  • 1

    Francisco G. Dakila, Jr. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas

    Near-Term Economic Outlook of the Euro-Area and Asia: Prospects for the Euro-area Economies and

    Macroeconomic Implications for the ASEAN+3 Economies

    26 September 2012

    OECD Development Centre-AMRO Joint Asian Regional Roundtable

  • 2

    Outline

    I. Implications of global economic developments to the region

    II. Challenges to monetary policymaking

    III. BSP policy responses

    IV. Summary

  • 3

    I. Implications of global economic developments to the region

    Significant events occurring in several fronts:

    • Eurozone – sovereign debt crisis and recession

    • US – higher unemployment, slow growth and fiscal tightening

    • Middle East – geopolitical risks and impact on oil prices

    • China – low growth performance

  • 4

    II. Challenges to monetary policymaking

    1. Impacts on the real economy

    Total exports by country of destination Total remittances by country of source

    Data for 2011

  • 6

    2. Volatility and correlation between global financial indicators

    Source: IMF WEO July

    2012

    6

    Equity Indices (Indices; January 1,

    2010=100)

    Exchange Rate Indices (Indices; January 1,

    2010=100) Implied Volatility (percent)

    Government Bond

    Yields (percent)

    Source: IMF WEO April

    2012

    Source: IMF WEO July

    2012 Source: IMF WEO July

    2012

    II. Challenges to monetary policymaking

  • 7

    II. Challenges to monetary policymaking

    3. Impact on the financial sector

    Philippine banking system exposure to Europe

    As of January 2011

    As of June 2011

    As of October 2011 p/

    Level (US$ billion) 4.5 2.1 1.9

    Share to total assets (%) 2.9 1.4 1.2

    Source: BSP

  • 8

    II. Challenges to monetary policymaking

    Net private flows to EMEs estimated to be US$1 trillion for 2011 and 2012 • Half of value to Emerging Asia and about half of which is to China

    Source: Capital Flows to Emerging Market Economies, September 2011. Institute of International Finance.

    4. Capital flows and impacts

  • 10

    10

    Source: BSP

    Current Account Balance (in million US dollars)

    1999 – 2012Q2

    -5,000

    0

    5,000

    10,000

    15,000

    20,000

    25,000

    19

    99

    20

    00

    20

    01

    20

    02

    20

    03

    20

    04

    20

    05

    20

    06

    20

    07

    20

    08

    20

    09

    20

    10

    20

    11

    20

    12

    -Q1

    Current Account Balance Remittances*/ By custodian banks.

    Source: BSP-International Operations Department

    Philippines: Portfolio Investment flows*/

    (in million US dollars)

    2008 – 2012 1H

    Capital flows can reinforce the impact of high current account receipts

    -5,000

    0

    5,000

    10,000

    15,000

    20,000

    Inflows Outflows Net

    II. Challenges to monetary policymaking

    3. Capital flows and impacts

  • 11

    II. Challenges to monetary policymaking

    3a. Implications on the exchange rate

    0

    40

    80

    120

    160

    Jan-

    06

    May

    -06

    Sep

    -06

    Jan-

    07

    May

    -07

    Sep

    -07

    Jan-

    08

    May

    -08

    Sep

    -08

    Jan-

    09

    May

    -09

    Sep

    -09

    Jan-

    10

    May

    -10

    Sep

    -10

    Jan-

    11

    May

    -11

    Sep

    -11

    Indonesia Philippines Singapore Malaysia

    Thailand Taiwan South Korea Hong Kong

    Exchange Rate Index, Various Asian Countries (monthly average, January 2006 = 100, $/local currency)

    Source: ARIC database.

  • 13

    3b. Impact of capital inflows on effectiveness of monetary policy

    Philippines’ case: Prior to 2010, yield curve tracks movements in policy rates but since then, movements in policy rate & T-bill rates appear to have

    diverged

    13

    II. Challenges to monetary policymaking

  • 14

    -5.0

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    J F MA M J J A S O N D J F MA M J J A S O N D J F MA M J J A S O N D J F MA M J J A S O N D J F MA M

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    in p

    erce

    nt

    Growth Rates of Domestic Liquidity and Outstanding Loans of U/KBsJan 2008 - May 2012

    U/KB Loans M3

    May 201214.7 pct

    May 20127.9 pct

    II. Challenges to monetary policymaking

    3c. Implications on credit growth

  • 15

    III. BSP policy responses

    • Policy rates

    • Market-determined exchange rate

    • Liberalization of foreign exchange regulations

    • Heightened international cooperation

    • Macroprudential measures

    • Strengthening the financial system

  • 16

    16

    Inflation dynamics remain favorable.

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    Headline Lower Bound of Target Upper Bound of Target

    2.8%

    June

    Monetary policy

    kept inflation in

    2011 at 4.6% --

    well-within target

    July 2012

    inflation at 3.2%;

    YTD inflation of

    3.1 percent within

    target

    Inflation

    projected to settle

    at the lower half of

    the target of 3-5

    % in 2012-13

  • 17

    III. BSP policy responses

    • Policy rates

    • Market-determined exchange rate

    • Liberalization of foreign exchange regulations

    • Heightened international cooperation

    • Macroprudential measures

    • Strengthening the financial system

  • 18

    18

    Philippines Effective Exchange Rate

    Index

    January 1998-April 2012

    Source: BSP

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    19

    98

    :01

    M

    19

    98

    :07

    M

    19

    99

    :01

    M

    19

    99

    :07

    M

    20

    00

    :01

    M

    20

    00

    :07

    M

    20

    01

    :01

    M

    20

    01

    :07

    M

    20

    02

    :01

    M

    20

    02

    :07

    M

    20

    03

    :01

    M

    20

    03

    :07

    M

    20

    04

    :01

    M

    20

    04

    :07

    M

    20

    05

    :01

    M

    20

    05

    :07

    M

    20

    06

    :01

    M

    20

    06

    :07

    M

    20

    07

    :01

    M

    20

    07

    :07

    M

    20

    08

    :01

    M

    20

    08

    :07

    M

    20

    09

    :01

    M

    20

    09

    :07

    M

    20

    10

    :01

    M

    20

    10

    :07

    M

    20

    11

    :01

    M

    20

    11

    :07

    M

    20

    12

    :01

    M

    REER Major REER Broad REER Narrow

    40

    42

    44

    46

    48

    50

    Ja

    n-

    09

    Ma

    r-

    09

    Ma

    y-

    09

    J

    ul-

    09

    Se

    p-

    09

    No

    v-

    09

    Ja

    n-

    10

    Ma

    r-

    10

    Ma

    y-

    10

    J

    ul-

    10

    Se

    p-

    10

    No

    v-

    10

    Ja

    n-

    11

    Ma

    r-

    11

    Ma

    y-

    11

    J

    ul-

    11

    Se

    p-

    11

    No

    v-

    11

    Ja

    n-

    12

    Ma

    r-

    12

    Ma

    y-

    12

    J

    ul-

    12

    Peso –USD Daily Average Exchange

    Rate

    January 2009 – June 2012

    Foreign

    exchange

    market

    42.776

    5

    177.87

    140.86

    89.55

  • 19

    III. BSP policy responses

    Collaborative initiatives

    • Global and regional collaborations

    IMF bilateral borrowing facility

    ASEAN’s Chiang-Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM)

    • Inter-agency initiatives within the Philippines

    Financial Sector Forum

    Financial Stability Coordination Council

  • 20

    III. BSP policy responses

    Collaborative initiatives

    • Global and regional collaborations

    IMF bilateral borrowing facility

    ASEAN’s Chiang-Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM)

    • Inter-agency initiatives within the Philippines

    Financial Sector Forum

    Financial Stability Coordination Council

  • 21

    21

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

    Rati

    os in

    Perc

    en

    t (%

    )

    Solo = 16.44%

    Consolidated = 17.43%

    CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO (CAR)

    2001-September 2011

    BSP Regulatory Requirement of

    10%

    International Standard of 8%

    LOAN AND ASSET QUALITY RATIOS

    As of end-April 2012

    Feb.

    Dec.

    Banking system remains sound and stable

    Source:

    BSP

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    7,000

    8,000

    9,000

    2001 2002 2003 20042005 2006 2007 20082009 2010 2011 2012

    Leve

    ls in

    PhP

    Bill

    ions

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    Rat

    ios

    in P

    erce

    nt (%

    )

    Levels in PhP Billions

    Growth Rate

    ASSETS GROWTH

    2001 – April 2012

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Mar-

    12

    RETURN ON ASSETS (ROA)/RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE)

    UKBs, As of March 2012

    0

    4

    8

    12

    16

    20

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    Ra

    tio

    s in

    Pe

    rce

    nt

    (%) NPL Ratio NPA Ratio

    ROE =13.09%

    ROA = 1.63%

    Apr. P7,555.6 6.7%

    NPA Ratio (UBs and KBs)

    = 2.77%

    NPL Ratio (UBs and KBs) = 2.30%

  • 22

    There is limited evidence of stretched asset market valuations…

    22

    Equities market

    8.0

    10.0

    12.0

    14.0

    16.0

    18.0

    20.0

    22.0

    24.0

    26.0

    28.0

    30.0

    19

    97

    M0

    1

    19

    97

    M0

    7

    19

    98

    M0

    1

    19

    98

    M0

    7

    19

    99

    M0

    1

    19

    99

    M0

    7

    20

    00

    M0

    1

    20

    00

    M0

    7

    20

    01

    M0

    1

    20

    01

    M0

    7

    20

    02

    M0

    1

    20

    02

    M0

    7

    20

    03

    M0

    1

    20

    03

    M0

    7

    20

    04

    M0

    1

    20

    04

    M0

    7

    20

    05

    M0

    1

    20

    05

    M0

    7

    20

    06

    M0

    1

    20

    06

    M0

    7

    20

    07

    M0

    1

    20

    07

    M0

    7

    20

    08

    M0

    1

    20

    08

    M0

    7

    20

    09

    M0

    1

    20

    09

    M0

    7

    20

    10

    M0

    1

    20

    10

    M0

    7

    20

    11

    M0

    1

    20

    11

    M0

    7

    20

    12

    M0

    1

    Price-to-Earnings (P/E) RatioJanuary 1997 - June 2012

    P/E Ratio Trend

    -

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    19

    87

    M0

    1

    19

    88

    M0

    1

    19

    89

    M0

    1

    19

    90

    M0

    1

    19

    91

    M0

    1

    19

    92

    M0

    1

    19

    93

    M0

    1

    19

    94

    M0

    1

    19

    95

    M0

    1

    19

    96

    M0

    1

    19

    97

    M0

    1

    19

    98

    M0

    1

    19

    99

    M0

    1

    20

    00

    M0

    1

    20

    01

    M0

    1

    20

    02

    M0

    1

    20

    03

    M0

    1

    20

    04

    M0

    1

    20

    05

    M0

    1

    20

    06

    M0

    1

    20

    07

    M0

    1

    20

    08

    M0

    1

    20

    09

    M0

    1

    20

    10

    M0

    1

    20

    11

    M0

    1

    20

    12

    M0

    1

    Philippine Stock Exchange IndexJanuary 1997 - June 2012

    Philippine Stock Exchange Index Trend

    5,246.

    41

    120

    125

    130

    135

    140

    145

    150

    155

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    Ratio of Capital to Rental Values: Residential Sector2001 Q1 - 2012 Q1

    Ratio of capital to rental values: Residential

    Trend

    Pe

    rce

    nt

    52

    56

    60

    64

    68

    72

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Q1

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    Ratio of Capital to Rental Values: Office Sector2001 Q1 - 2012 Q1

    Ratio of capital to rental values: Office Trend

    Pe

    rce

    nt

    Real estate

    market

  • 23

    III. BSP policy responses

    Responses in the 1990s capital flows episode

    • Sterilized intervention

    • Liberalization of foreign exchange regulations

    • Strengthening prudential measures

    • Reduction of exporters’ production costs

  • 24

    Other potential policy responses

    • Capital flow management (CFMs) measures influence capital flows

    • Administrative controls – quantitative limits or prohibitions

    • Market-based controls – increase cost of transactions

    • Capital controls are CFMs that discriminate on residency

  • 25

    Examples from other countries

    Instrument Strengths Weaknesses Examples

    Tax measures Targeted and easily calibrated to size of risks

    Calibration difficult in practice

    Reduces investor confidence

    Brazil: IOF

    Thailand: tax on interest income and capital gains of foreign bondholders

    S Korea: withholding tax on interest income of foreign bondholders

    Minimum periods

    Incentive for long-term investments

    Only delay, not eliminate, capital flows

    Indonesia: 1-month holding period for BI certificates

    Quantitative limits

    Control how much capital is allowed entry

    Allocation and monitoring of allowance may be difficult

    Indonesia: ST external bank borrowing limited to 30% of capital

    S Korea: Limits on banks’ FX forward positions and derivatives build-up

    Unremunerated reserve requirements

    Strong disincentive to investors

    Can drive away beneficial investment

    Brazil: 60% URR on banks’ FX positions in spot market

    Thailand: 30% URR on short-term foreign investment

    Sources: 1. Institute of International Finance “Capital Flows to Emerging Market Economies” January 2011 2. World Economic Forum “Financial Development Report 2010”

  • 26

    Other potential policy responses

    Issues on capital controls

    Effectiveness depends on

    • Institutional infrastructures in place, and

    • Enforcement of controls

    Generally temporary measures because market players find ways to circumvent measures in time

  • 27

    IV. Summary

    • Philippine financial system is sound; banking institutions are equipped with the requisite capital buffers.

    • Greater monitoring and information gathering are needed for risk identification and assessment that will allow for timely and appropriate responses.

    • Extensiveness of impacts calls for collaboration and coordinated responses.

    • There is need to further improve financial regulatory framework to include implementation of OTC derivatives market reform and, if possible, oversight and regulation of the shadow banking system.

    Building economy as well as fortifying “defenses” – creating environment for sustainable growth while managing risks

  • 28

    Better understanding of nature of FX inflows

    Exchange rate flexibility

    Reserve accumulation & associated liquidity management

    Financial sector reforms to deepen financial markets

    Macroprudential measures to strengthen health of banking

    system

    Reform of the FX regulatory framework

    Prepayment of external debt

    Adjustments in monetary policy, when necessary

    BSP’s toolkit in managing capital flows

    28