NDIA SLAAD FORCEnet Innovation and Experimentation Brief CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo” Deputy...

NDIA SLAAD FORCEnet Innovation and Experimentation Brief

CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo”Deputy FORCEnet NETWARCOM

29 April 2004

FORCEnet

MissionMission PeoplPeoplee

CapabilityCapability

FORCEnetAgendaAgenda

• FORCEnet Organization and Alignment• FORCEnet Experimentation• Trident Warrior• FORCEnet FY05/FY06 Sea Trial Priorities• FORCEnet Engagement Packs



FORCEnetForce Development DirectorateForce Development Directorate

Deputy/Technical DirectorGS-2210-14P. JacksonBSC 80110

Admin Asst.GS-318-07

VacantBSC 80400

Concept and Technology Discovery DivisionO-6/1800

CAPT(sel) C. Abbott

Experimentation DivisionO-5/1050

CAPT(sel) R. SimonBSC 80020

Operational Architectures DivisionGS-1550-14

D. MillerBSC 60080

Readiness Sys Innov & Integration DivisionGS-2210-14

S. TysorBSC 66030(F)

Enterprise W eb Services DivisionGS-15/O-6

CAPT S. Hiser

FORCE TransformationO-6/1000

CAPT ZalaskusBSC 80310



FORCEnetFORCEnet Experimentation DivisionFORCEnet Experimentation Division

DAA/ N etw o rksC TR

Do ug PistonN 6 / SPAW AR LNO

I OC DR Foster

N 91B

T echnical PilotC TR

Bruce BurkettFn21BB

C 4 I SystemsC TR

C liff BusseyFn21CB

T echnical AdvisorC TR

M errill W itzelFn21MW

KM Co nceptsC TR

Steve BanusFn21SB

I nnovatio n Co ncepts04/ 05/ 80090

LC DR McM ahonFn21

Plans/ J N T C D&EC TR

Dave Sum m erFn22DS

Plans C oo rdinatorC TR

G il Sho rttFn22GS

J N T C oo rdinatorC TR

R o n AdamoFn22RA

O ps C onceptsC TR

Steve W o odFn22SW

I nnovation Analysis D irC TR

Shelley G allupFn22SG

O p Thread AnalysisC TR

B ill K im pleFn22BK

Analysis System Develo perC TR

R andy M auleFn22RM

Data Base M anagerC TR

Vacant

Sea T rial/ Analysis/ J N T C O OR D/ I nterop04/ 05

LC DR BilsonFn22

I M Co nceptsC TR

M ark SteersFn23MS

Do ctrine/ Co nops/ T TPC TR

Brad Po eltlerFn23BP

I ntegratio n T eam Lead03

LC DR LaborFn231

Deputy04

LC DR L isow skiFn23D

C urrent O ps05

C DR J araFn23

Deputy04 / 05/ GS14

VacantFn2D

Branch H eadC APT (S) Abbo tt

Fn2

LEGEND

1 – Gov GS

15 – Contractor

7 – military

FORCEnet Execution CenterSan Diego



FORCEnetFORCEnet Alignment



FORCEnetFORCEnet Organization & Process FORCEnet Organization & Process

Fleet Modernization

Plan

Assessments

Campaign Analysis

Modeling

PPBSOperational Views

System Views

Technical Views

Architecture

Fleet

Experimentation Concept Development

Science & Technology

Innovation

Sea Trial

RequirementsNear term

Far Term

Mid Term

Assessment

FORCEnet Experimentation


29 April 2004

FORCEnet



FORCEnet

FORCEnet FORCEnet CD&ECD&EPathPath

Mid and Far Mid and Far TermTerm

FORCEnet FORCEnet Prototype PathPrototype Path

Near TermNear Term

FORCEnet Campaign Plan: Two Path Strategy

FY 03 FY 04 FY 05

FY 03 FY 04 FY 05

Block 0 Block 1

FORCEnet Trident Warrior

1. Field FORCEnet Block capabilities to the Fleet including the enabling organization and processes.

2. Pursue rapid prototyping of FORCEnet capabilities to improve joint warfighting now.

1. Provide actionable recommendations from experimentation results to Navy PPBS process.

Feeding Concepts to prototyping



FORCEnetFORCEnet Concept DevelopmentFORCEnet Concept Development

• Develop a draft functional-level concept for FORCEnet which describes how future joint and combined network-centric capabilities may be used to facilitate and enhance naval operations in the 2015-2020 timeframe.

• Supports: – FORCEnet transformational requirements development process,

– FORCEnet operational architecture development

– Concept development & experimentation

• Guided by the FORCEnet Vision• FORCEnet concept will serve as a coherent unifying concept that

enables Sea Strike, Sea Shield, and Sea Basing, as well as a range of supporting concepts.

Foundation for FORCEnet Requirements, Architecture and CD&E



FORCEnet

FORCEnet FORCEnet CD&ECD&EPathPath

Mid and Far Mid and Far TermTerm

FORCEnet FORCEnet Prototype PathPrototype Path

Near TermNear Term

FORCEnet Campaign Plan: Two Path Strategy

FY 03 FY 04 FY 05

FY 03 FY 04 FY 05

Block 0 Block 1

FORCEnet Trident Warrior

1. Field FORCEnet Block capabilities to the Fleet including the enabling organization and processes.

2. Pursue rapid prototyping of FORCEnet capabilities to improve joint warfighting now.

1. Provide actionable recommendations from experimentation results to Navy PPBS process.

Feeding Concepts to prototyping



FORCEnetWhat is a Trident Warrior?What is a Trident Warrior?

• Trident Warrior is:• The Major FORCEnet Sea Trial Experiment

• Annual

• NETWARCOM sponsored

• Trident Warrior Experiment Intent• Provide a rapid fielding of improved warfighting capability to the Fleet, with full

supportability and maintainability.

• Develop supporting Tactics/Techniques/Procedures (TTP) and Concept of Operations (CONOPS) on how best to use this new capability to optimize the execution of Naval operations.



FORCEnetFORCEnet Trident Warrior

Process ContributorsFORCEnet Trident Warrior

Process Contributors

• NETWARCOM – Navy’s Operational Agent for FORCEnetTrident Warrior lead

• SPAWAR – FORCEnet Chief EngineerTrident Warrior CHENG

• Naval Postgraduate School – Analysis Lead for TW

• Naval War College – TW Wargame lead

• Navy Warfare Development Command – Sea Trial CoordinatorWarfare Centers of Excellence develop CONOPS / TTPS

• Fleet Forces Command (FFC) – Sea Trial LeadApproval and oversight for all resources and ship installs

• OPNAV N61 – Resource SponsorFORCEnet PE Line

Integrate experiment results into POM assessment process



FORCEnetTrident Warrior ApproachTrident Warrior Approach

Inte

gra

tionProgram of Record Ship Alts

Program of Record Temp Alts

In Theater Prototypes

New Prototypes

Fleet Driven

TTP and Conops Results in an early delivery of FORCEnet capability with a subset of supportable leave behind capability

Tailored to meet Fleet / COCOM requirements

Leverage Fleet / Joint exercises

and experiments

NewCONOPS

NewTech.

Impact onprocesses &organization

Sea Trial and FORCEnet Priorities


29 April 2004

FORCEnet



FORCEnet

Conventional Strike(Include SOF) Theater Air & Missile

Defense

CNO

Sea Strike Sea Shield Sea Basing FORCEnet

C2F/5F C3F/7F C2F/6F NETWARCOM

NWDC

Sea Strike Sea Basing FORCEnet

NSAWC

SUW

Deploy and Employ

Sea Trial Organization

STOM

C2F

N702

N701

N704

N703

Sea Shield

CFFC

Sea Trial ESG

Integrated JT LogAT / FP

COP / CTP

Comms & Data Networks ISR

Undersea Warfare

Strategic Deterrence

CSF

SWDG

NFS

SWDG

CPF N00ASW

SWDG

FFC N9 C2F FFC N41

C2F

Comm & Data Netwks.Team Lead: NETWARCOMCPF, CNE, CSF, CNSF,CNAF, NWDC, NNSOCConsulting Members:OPNAV N61, ONR, COTFSPAWAR, MCCDC

NETWARCOM

NETWARCOM FFC N2

Intel. Surv. & Reccon.Team Lead: FFC N2CPF, CNE, CSF,CNSF, CNAF, NWDC,NNWC, NSAWC, NNSOCConsulting Members:OPNAV N61, ONRCOTF, ONI,SPAWARMCCDC

Comm. Op. & Tac Pict.Team Lead:NETWARCOMCPF, CNE, CSF, CNSF,CNAF, NWDC, NSAWCCUSConsulting Members:OPNAV N61, ONR, COTFSPAWAR, MCCDC

PrePo JT Assets Afloat

ST ESG: All OA, N7, CNR, NWDC, MCCDC ST ESG: All OA, N7, CNR, NWDC, MCCDC

Executive Agent for SEA TRIAL

SEA TRIALCoordinatorOperational Agents

Fleet CollaborativeTeams



FORCEnetCommander’s IntentCommander’s Intent

• Guidance for FORCENet FCT’s to be used to develop the FY 05/06 FORCEnet Sea Trial Execution Plan

• Specifics:50% of experimental initiatives will address NCDP gaps

• Highest priority is network visualization and instrumentation

50% of experimental initiatives will address Numbered Fleet Priorities• Top 10 IT priorities• Sea Strike, Sea Shield, Sea Basing FORCEnet enabling capabilities

FY 05 main Effort• TW 05, theme is coalition / MN interoperability partnership with C2F, East

Coast, ESG or CSG• Covers the full spectrum of experimentation

– Prototyping, concept development, non leave behind initiatives



FORCEnetCommander’s IntentCommander’s Intent

• Top Priority, NLT Jul 2004– Develop a FORCEnet Functional / Enabling Concept based on the NOC

– Foundation for concept based experimentation in the future

– Basis for FORCEnet requirements and architectures

• End State– FORCEnet two-year Execution Plan will directly impact PR 07 and POM 08

and have immediate and tangible results which address Fleet priorities for SP 21



FORCEnetNETWARCOM FY 05 PrioritiesNETWARCOM FY 05 Priorities

COMMS AND NETWORK DATABASES

1. INSUFFICIENT BANDWIDTH (BW) FOR SMALL SHIPS

2. 360 DEGREE SATCOM RECEPTION

3. MONITORING AND CONTROLLING BW USAGE

4. GLOBAL NETWORK VISUALIZTION – NETOPS COP

5. ENTERPRISE-WIDE INFORMATION ASSURANCE

6. AUTOMATED NETWORK SOFTWARE-CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

7. UNUSED BW TO SHIPS

8. MLS IN SUPPORT OF COALITION OPERATIONS

9. DISTRIBUTED ISR FROM JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF ISR)

COMMON OPERATIONAL-TACTICAL PICTURE

1. BLUE FORCE TRACKER AND SITUATIONAL AWARENESS

2. UNDERSEA COMMON OPERATIONAL-TACTICAL PICTURE

3. IMPROVED MARITIME COTP




INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAISSANCE 1. ISR Management2. ISR sensors INFORMATION OPERATIONS1. COMPUTER NETWORKD DEFENSE-IN-DEPTH2. CENTRALIZED IO MISSION PLANNING CAPABILITY3. DEPLOYABLE MULTI-MEDIA NAVAL PSYOP CAPABILITY4. COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONIC ATTACK CAPABILITY5. ENHANCED SPECIFIC EMITTER IDENTIFICATION (SEI) CAPABILITY6. NEXT GENERATION SURFACE EW SYSTEM7. SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT TOOL8. SHIP-BORNE COUNTER SPACE CAPABILITY9. TACTICAL-OPERATIONAL COMPUTER NETWORK ATTACK10. DATA LINK DECEPTION CAPABILITY




• COMMS and Networks– GIG-Compliant Network Monitoring & Control experimentation– On-the Move Naval Networking experimentation– Coalition information sharing (comms, COP, CIE and CDS)– Information Assurance / Computer Network Defense-in-Depth– Information Management/Knowledge Management

• COTP – BFT and Situational awareness – Coordinated Real-time Execution experimentation– Improved Maritime COTP and Decision Making experimentation– COP correlation and fusion– XTCF (Extensible Tactical C4I Framework)– Battle management and synchronization– USW CUP

• ISR– On-Demand ISR experimentation– Improved Imagery Experimentation– Horizontal fusion

FORCEnet Engagement Packs


29 April 2004

FORCEnet



FORCEnetFORCEnet Engagement Pack (FnEP)

DefinitionFORCEnet Engagement Pack (FnEP)

Definition

FORCEnet Engagement Packs are small scale system ensembles which demonstrate the engagement enabling power of FORCEnet by integrating Joint sensors, platforms, weapons, warriors, networks, and command & control systems with requirements to perform cross-mission enabled Network-centric Combat Reach Capabilities

Combat Reach Capabilities:• Integrated Fire Control• Automated Battle Management Aids• Composite Tracking• Composite Combat Identification• Common/Single Integrated Pictures

FnEP Attributes:• Joint e.g. Naval, AF, Army• Engagement-oriented • Adaptive e.g., Strike and MD• Field near-term e.g., w/in 5 Years• Capability Based

POC: LCDR Joe McMahon, NETWARCOM, [email protected]



FORCEnet

Experimentation

Pack Development

FY2006 FY2007 FY2008FY2004 FY2005 FY2009

Document requirementsCommon Reference Scenarios, Choose systems

Align Combat Reach technology and acquisition efforts

Initiate Pathfinder

Effort

JFCOM BMC2 Oversight

OrganizationOrganization

ONR NIFC Demo

MD/Strike Pack Factor Integration

IOC Packs

SUW/USW/MCMPack Development

Experimentation

M&S/HWIL JDEP Field Exercises/Sea TrialTech Demos

Pack Development

Fn Pathfinder: FnEPFn Pathfinder: FnEP



FORCEnetQuestions?Questions?

“Speed to Capability”



FORCEnet“FORCEnet will enable the naval service to employ a fully netted force, engage with widely distributed

combat forces, and command with increased awareness and speed as an integral part of the

joint team.”

We’ve started to FORCEnet … appreciate the reason why, get to know the language and

join up!

- Admiral Vern Clark- Admiral Vern Clark

25



FORCEnet

BackupsBackups



FORCEnet

USN CONCEPT

HIERARCHY

USMC CONCEPT

HIERARCHY

JOINT CAPSTONE CONCEPT

NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY

NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY

JOINT VISION 2020

NAVAL POWER 21

NAVAL TRANSFORMATION

ROADMAP

NAVAL OPERATING CONCEPT

SEA POWER 21

MARINE CORPS STRATEGY 21

Naval Strategy

Operational Concepts =Sea ShieldSea StrikeSea Basing

Operational Concepts =Ship to Objective Maneuver,Exp ManueverWarfare

Functional Concepts = Intel, Log, MCM, …

Functional Concepts = FORCEnet

The how to achieve Naval transformation

Naval Vision

Naval CapstoneConcept to achieveGlobal CONOPS

Joint Operating Concept

National Guidance

Joint Guidance

Transformation Drivers for Sea Power 21

Transformation Drivers for Sea Power 21

TRANSFORMATION PLANNING GUIDANCE

Under development



FORCEnetFORCEnet Taxonomy: The basis for The Concept

Development & Experimentation PathFORCEnet Taxonomy: The basis for The Concept

Development & Experimentation Path

4.1.1 - Large Numbers (>10000)

4.1.2 - Low cost

4.1.3 - Distributed

4.1.4 - Autonomous

4.1.5 - Multiple Phenomena

4.1.6 - Continuous coverage4.1.6.1 – Subsurface4.1.6.2 – Surface4.1.6.3 – Air4.1.6.4 - Cyber space

4.1.7 - Standards based output

4.1.8 – Connected

4.1.9 – Remotely Operated …..

4.2.1 - Node adressable network architecture

4.2.2Universal access4.2.2.1-Tactical (LTNs)4.2.2.2-Operational (LANs)4.2.2.3-Strategic (Enterprise)

4.2.3 - Fault Tolerant

4.2.4 - LPD/LPI Comms

4.2.5 - Quality of Service

4.2.6 - Multiple, redundant comm paths

4.2.7 -Mobile/Expeditionary

4.2.8 - Scalable

4.2.9 - Trusted

4.2.10 – Highly available

4.2.11 - Standards based protocol

4.2.12 - Next generation internet like

4.2.13 – Adaptable to C2 needs

4.2.14 – Self organizing

4.2.15 – Self healing

4.2.16 – Common geo/temporal reference…..

4.3.1 – Information Management4.3.1.1- Data mining4.3.1.2 - Filtering4.3.1.3 - Association4.3.1.4 - Analysis4.3.1.5 - Alert4.3.1.6 - Prediction4.3.1.7 - Decision support4.3.1.8 – Assimilation4.3.1.9 – Fusion4.3.1.10 - Trust/Pedigree

4.3.2 - Common, intuitive user interface

4.3.3 - Common, intuitive info representation

4.3.4 - Real time processing

4.3.5 - Reach back

4.3.6 - Semantic data markup

4.3.7 – Agent based computing….

4.4.1 - Distributed commanders

4.4.2 - Well understood ROE

4.4.3 - Well understood commanders intent4.4.4 - Situation specific training4.4.4.1 - Adversary’s Region4.4.4.2 - Adversary’s Culture

4.4.5 - Robust team rehearsal

4.4.6 - Collaborative planning (Naval, Joint, Coalition)

4.4.7 - Access to information (Naval, Joint, Coalition)

4.4.7.1 - Based on need vice comms/computers

4.4.8 - Reduce reaction time4.4.9 - Cognition4.4.9.1 – Presentation4.4.9.2 – Representation…..

4.5.1 - Defensive IO4.5.1.1 - Strong computer network defense

•Hardware•Software•Processes•Procedures

4.5.1.2 -Intrusion detection

4.5.2 Quality of Service……

4. IKA

4.3 Adaptive / Automated decision aids and human centric engineering

4.4 Distributed, collaborative C2 and human centric engineering

4.5 Information Assurance

4.1 Expeditionary, multi tiered sensor and weapons grids

4.2 Dynamic multi-path and survivable

networks

4.2 Dynamic multi-path and survivable networks

4.1 Expeditionary, multi tiered sensor and weapons grids

4.3 Adaptive / Automated decision aids and human centric engineering

4.4 Distributed, collaborative C2

and human centric engineering

4.5 Information Assurance



FORCEnet

Assistant Secretary of the NavyResearch, Development, Acquisition

Acquisition

NAVSEA

NAVAIR

Chief of Naval Operations

Operations & Requirements

CFFC

CommanderFleet Forces Command

NETWARCOM

Naval NetworkWarfare Command

SPAWAR as SPAWAR as FORCEnetFORCEnet

Chief EngineerChief Engineer

Additional

Duty

AdditionalDuty

AdditionalDuty

SPAWAR

SPAWAR as SPAWAR as FORCEnet FORCEnet

Chief AssessorChief Assessor

FORCEnet AlignmentFORCEnet Alignment



FORCEnetStatus of FORCEnet Requirements/ Architectures/ Standards Implementation

Status of FORCEnet Requirements/ Architectures/ Standards Implementation

FORCEnetCompliance

Checklist

ArchitecturesStandards &Assessments

FORCEnetRequirements

GenerationComptroller

Guidance RequirementsReview &Validation

S&T/FNC

Planning

OPNAVSponsorPlanning

OSD/Agency

Coordination

RequirementsGuidance

NETWARCOM, MCCDC.& Fleet OAG CNO (N61)

SPAWAR

CNO (N70)

DoN CIO

Services,JCS, JFCOM

In Place

Legend

In Process

In Review

ISR/DCGS Planning

AcquisitionPlanning &Execution

AcquisitionGuidance

NTWSInteroperabilityRequirements

& Certification

CNO (N75, N76, N77, N78)

ONRNCTSI

JointCoordination

OSD (AT&L,NII), TCO,DoD CIO

CNO (N8)

ASN (FM&C)

POM/Investment

StrategyCNO (N70)

CNO (N20)

IT Policy &Requirements

PEOs, PMs,SYSCOMs

USMCImplementation

(EFDS)

Allies/Friends/Coalition

Coordination

AUSCANNZUKUSSingapore

ASN (RD&A)

Industry

CongressBAMS

DDXCVN21

LCS

CLIP

L i n k 4 / 1 1 / 1 6 / 2 2C E C / V o i c e / D a t aJ T R S / I B G W N

L o c a l P l a t f o r mN e t w o r k s

J F M C C

H u m a n - S y s t e m s

C E N T R I X

I n t e r f a c e

L i n k 4 / 1 1 / 1 6 / 2 2C E C / V o i c e / D a t aJ T R S / I B G W N

L o c a l P l a t f o r mN e t w o r k s

J F M C C

H u m a n - S y s t e m s

C E N T R I X

I n t e r f a c e

CNO and ASN(RD&A)Endorsed FORCEnet

Pilot Programs



FORCEnet

6

FORCEnet Capabilities-Based Requirements Process

Definition of Enterprise FORCEnet Requirements/Architectures/Standards

Definition of Enterprise FORCEnet Requirements/Architectures/Standards

31

Establishment of Top-Level FO RCEnet Capabilities

C ollect, Process

a nd Distr ibut eO rg anic se nsor a ndw eap on Inf orma tion

C ollect, Processa nd Distr ibut e

N on -o rg an ic S enso rInfo rma tion

P ro vid e e xped itio na rym ulti-tie re d se nsor

an d w ea po ninf orma tion

C ond uct B attle

M ana gem e nt / C 2am on g N ava l

fo rces

C ond uct B attleM ana gem e nt / C 2

w ith Jo in tfo rces


with C oalitionfo rces

C ollect, Fuse and

D isse mina teOpe ra tiona lInt ellig ence

Provide au tom ate d,tim ely a ccess a nd

excha ng e o f da ta withjo int a nd coalition forces

Assess, ch aracte r izeand dissem ina te

e nviro nm en talin form ation

C ollabo ra te withcivil /

law e nfo rce me ntag encies

Co ndu ctd istr ibu ted ,

collabo ra tiveco mm an d & con trol

M ana ge in fo rm atio n

tran sfer a mo ngNa valforces

M ana ge in fo rm atio ntransf er w it h

na tiona l net wo rks

M ana ge in fo rm atio ntransf er w it hJoint forces


transf er w it hcoa lit io n fo rce s

P rot ect frie ndlyinfo rma tio n

n etw orks

Provide D yn am ic,mu lti-pa th an d

su rvivab lenet wo rks

C o ndu ct

ope ra tiona land ta ct ica l

Plan ning

Co ndu ct n ett ed,p ro gn ostic

lo gistics

O rg anize, synch ro nizeand inte grate firesand m ane uve r t o

ena ble ma sse d effe cts

D yn am ica lly

allocate an dcon trol sen sors an d

se nsor p la tfo rm s

Provide Ad apt ive /au tom at ed

de cisio naids

Provide

R ea l-tim e a dap tab leMa n-m achine

System s

ProvideMu lti- l in ear

C og nitive p ro ce ssin gw arriors

Prote ct F r ie nd lyIn form ationOut sid e t he

N e two rk

ProvideH um an -ce ntr ic

inte gration

De ny, D e grade

a nd DisruptA dversary In form ation

In fluen ceA dversary

Percept io n

Pro vid e Info rm at io nWe apo ns

FORCE NET

C ollect, Process

a nd Distr ibut eO rg anic se nsor a ndw eap on Inf orma tion

C ollect, Processa nd Distr ibut e

N on -o rg an ic S enso rInfo rma tion

P ro vid e e xped itio na rym ulti-tie re d se nsor

an d w ea po ninf orma tion

C ond uct B attle

M ana gem e nt / C 2am on g N ava l

fo rces


w ith Jo in tfo rces


with C oalitionfo rces

C ollect, Fuse and

D isse mina teOpe ra tiona lInt ellig ence

Provide au tom ate d,tim ely a ccess a nd

excha ng e o f da ta withjo int a nd coalition forces

Assess, ch aracte r izeand dissem ina te

e nviro nm en talin form ation

C ollabo ra te withcivil /

law e nfo rce me ntag encies

Co ndu ctd istr ibu ted ,

collabo ra tiveco mm an d & con trol


tran sfer a mo ngNa valforces

M ana ge in fo rm atio ntransf er w it h

na tiona l net wo rks

M ana ge in fo rm atio ntransf er w it hJoint forces


transf er w it hcoa lit io n fo rce s

P rot ect frie ndlyinfo rma tio n

n etw orks

Provide D yn am ic,mu lti-pa th an d

su rvivab lenet wo rks

C o ndu ct

ope ra tiona land ta ct ica l

Plan ning

Co ndu ct n ett ed,p ro gn ostic

lo gistics

O rg anize, synch ro nizeand inte grate firesand m ane uve r t o

ena ble ma sse d effe cts

D yn am ica lly

allocate an dcon trol sen sors an d

se nsor p la tfo rm s

Provide Ad apt ive /au tom at ed

de cisio naids

Provide

R ea l-tim e a dap tab leMa n-m achine

System s

ProvideMu lti- l in ear

C og nitive p ro ce ssin gw arriors

Prote ct F r ie nd lyIn form ationOut sid e t he

N e two rk

ProvideH um an -ce ntr ic

inte gration

De ny, D e grade

a nd DisruptA dversary In form ation

In fluen ceA dversary

Percept io n

Pro vid e Info rm at io nWe apo ns

FORCE NET

33

Degree to which currency matches what is needed (0 = no match, 1 = high degree of matching between currency level needed and available)

Timeliness

Error and confidence level for time and position information compared to a standard reference

Precision

Percentage of ground truth relevant and necessary for ongoing taskCompleteness

Degree of lack of ambiguity with previous informationConsistency

Correspondence with ground truth-correlation coefficient (0= no correspondence with ground truth, 1= full correspondence with ground truth). Data matrix comprised of relevant information items estimates (for instance: detection, ID, velocity, location, heading, etc.)

Accuracy

Notional MeasureAttribute

Capability: provide expeditionary, multi-tiered sensor and weapon information

Development of FORCEnet Metrics

SECNAV Report toCongress on FORCEnet

•FY 2003 Appropriations Conference Report (107-732): “While a solid organizational structure for the development of FORCEnet requirements has been established … conferees direct that the Secretary of the Navy submit, by May 1, 2003, a detailed report on the FORCEnet program …define requirements.”

FORCEnet Campaign Plan

•Requirements

•Architectures

•Standards

•Policies

•FY 2004 Senate Appropriations Committee Report (108-87): “ The Committee is supportive of the goals of this integration program. … The Committee directs that the FORCEnet program establish these requirements, test them within the Navy Warfighting Experiments and Demonstration line, and release the approved requirements to those affected programs as quickly as possible in FY 2004.”



FORCEnet

Operational Implementation,Refinement, and Update:•FORCEnet Innovation Continuum

•Trident Warrior “Speed to Capability”

Operational Implementation,Refinement, and Update:•FORCEnet Innovation Continuum

•Trident Warrior “Speed to Capability”

Acquisition Implementation,Refinement, and Update:•JRAE•FIOP/JBMC2/Other•FORCEnet Pilot Programs

Acquisition Implementation,Refinement, and Update:•JRAE•FIOP/JBMC2/Other•FORCEnet Pilot Programs

Enterprise Instantiation:• FORCEnet Compliance

Process/ Checklist

Enterprise Instantiation:• FORCEnet Compliance

Process/ Checklist

Working Baseline FORCEnet Requirements: 2003 FORCEnet Campaign Plan

Spiral Development and Implementation of FORCEnet Requirements/Architecture/ Standards

SECNAV Report to Congress

on FORCEnet

Congressional Direction FY2003/2004

Operational Requirements

System/Tech Requirements

Support/Policy Requirements

Implementation Requirements

FY03

FY04Updated FORCEnet Requirements:

2004 FORCEnet Campaign Plan



FORCEnetJoint / Allied Interoperability

2

HLS ScenarioHLS Scenario• USNORTHCOM• FEMA• DHS (TBD)• NGB• USCG• FBI (TBD)• Mexico (TBD)• Canada-Office of Critical Infrastructure

Protection and Emergency Preparedness (TBD)

Coalition ScenarioCoalition Scenario• USEUCOM

• CCEB nations: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States

• NATO nations: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Poland, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Czech Republic, Hungary, The Netherlands, Greece, Lithuania, Romania

• PACRIM nations: Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand (invited by USPACOM)

• Multinational Groups:– Multinational Naval Task Group

(MNTG – formerly AUSCANNZUKUS Navies)

Support to both scenariosSupport to both scenarios

• USA, USN, USMC, USAF

• USJFCOM

• DISA, NIMA, NSA, JITC

• Industry

Enhancing Allied/Coalition Interoperability- Joint Warfighter Interoperability Demonstration 2004/5 -

JFCOM JBMC2 Systems Engineering

Other Picture Efforts(TBD)

SIMPSISPSIGPSIAP

Blue Force Tracking – Army as Lead Service

Red Force Tracking – Precision Strike and TST

Targeting & Other Functions w/ Appropriate Ld Svc

FIOP

JFCOM(Oversight and Directive Authority)

Common C2/C4ISRT data/infrastructure services

Definition/coordinationof “picture efforts”*

Definition/coordinationof “functional/domain

efforts”

Imagery

COP

METOC

MTI

CEDGCCS-M

GCCS-ATBMCS

AFATDSASAS

MCSGCCS-AF

MSBLJSTARS

TESADSI

Aegis

GCCS

Coordination of FIOP SE processes and products with

POR systems andinfrastructure that implement

and field the capability

Service/Agency Programs

& Systems

JBMC2FIOPJBFSAWEEMC

JFCOM JBMC2 Systems Engineering

Other Picture Efforts(TBD)

SIMPSISPSIGPSIAP

Blue Force Tracking – Army as Lead Service

Red Force Tracking – Precision Strike and TST

Targeting & Other Functions w/ Appropriate Ld Svc

FIOP

JFCOM(Oversight and Directive Authority)

Common C2/C4ISRT data/infrastructure services

Definition/coordinationof “picture efforts”*

Definition/coordinationof “functional/domain

efforts”

Imagery

COP

METOC

MTI

CEDGCCS-M

GCCS-ATBMCS

AFATDSASAS

MCSGCCS-AF

MSBLJSTARS

TESADSI

Aegis

GCCS

Coordination of FIOP SE processes and products with

POR systems andinfrastructure that implement

and field the capability

Service/Agency Programs

& Systems

JBMC2FIOPJBFSAWEEMC

TSVTSVTSVTSVTSV

TBMCS

NCESAWACS AWACS AWACS

SmallUnmanned

Ground Vehicle

MedicalVehicle

Mounted CombatSystem

InfantryCarrierVehicle

NLOS Cannon

NLOS Mortar

Mule

IntelligentMunitions System

NLOS LaunchSystem

MaintVehicle UAV

Class IV

UnattendedGround

Sensors

UAVClass III

UAVClass I

UAVClass II

Soldier

HIMARS

TSVBlackhawk

Chinook

Land Warrior III

ATACMS

Comanche

AerialCommonSensor

JSTARS

Prophet

Multi-MissionRadar

Global Hawk

IBS

Rivet Joint

NSANGICCIA

HomelandDefense

DOE DIA

NIMA

National Databases

NetworkedBattle

Command

Armed RoboticVehicle

Network

Recon &Surv Vehicle

C2Vehicle

APACHE

WIN-TAccess

A2C2S

DCGS

Integrating USN and USA Efforts

Maneuver

ISR

C2

Sustainment

Networked Fires

Patriot

MEADS

MLRS

FBCB2

MCS

FCS UE Complementary SystemsFCS UA Core/CP Systems

Joint Systems/Multi-national

JLENS

GMLRS

UAH

DCGS-AASAS

AFATDS

CSSCS

NFCS

Version 3/31/03

IAS

TES

C2 Constellation

DTSS

Profiler

IMETS

AMDWSFAADC2ADSI

JTAGSSentinel

TAIS

ADOCS

Paladin

BATES

Firefinder

ADLER

JSOF C2

MCTIS

JWARN

SECOMP-I

JMPS

DCTS

IMS

TBMCS

FORCEnet

GCSS-A

OneSAFWARSIM

CATT

CCTT

TSV

Yellow Text = Increment 2 interface

CA&PsyopVehicle

TESSDLS

AWACS

GES

GCCS-A JC2

C2

JNMS

TCO

SIMACET

C2PC

SJFHQ

LLAP/FAST

DCGS-A

GBS

GSTAMIDS

ASTAMIDS

MTS

TC-AIMS-II

F/A-22

BFT

WIN-T ACCESS (UA)

IDM AKMS DSN EKMS EPLRS SINCGARSWIN-T JTRSFASTLANE STEP/TeleportBVTC PPS-5SIPRNET NIPRNET

GMF SATCOMDRSNSMART-T STAR-T (Phoenix)

LFC2ISAMPS

GBS

SICFSIR

HEROS-2/1

ATacCS

ComBAT

WIN-T ACCESS (UE)

WIN-T Access WIN-T ACCESS (JIM)

WIN-T ACCESS

AWACS

ATIA

CTIA

MC4ADA

MFCS LAMPAM

NFCS

MIP

= indirect

interoperability

DJC2

SIGP NCES

SISP

SIAP

FTTS

FMTV

GCCS-J

FORCENET

NFCS

JC2

Present Info

FORCEnetFORCEnet C2 CONSTELLATIONC2 CONSTELLATIONOpen Architecture Sensor Net

Generate Info

Transport Info

USN - USAF Comm Integration

FIOP

E-2

AOC

Aegis

C2 Ship

EP-3

Shooters

Shooters

Satellite

CEC

U2

E-3Precision Targeting

Post/Process

Converging USN-USAF C4ISR Architectures

TSVTSVTSVTSVTSV

TBMCS

NCESAWACS AWACS AWACS

SmallUnmanned

Ground Vehicle

MedicalVehicle

Mounted CombatSystem

InfantryCarrierVehicle

NLOS Cannon

NLOS Mortar

Mule

IntelligentMunitions System

NLOS LaunchSystem

MaintVehicle UAV

Class IV

UnattendedGround

Sensors

UAVClass III

UAVClass I

UAVClass II

Soldier

HIMARS

TSVBlackhawk

Chinook

Land Warrior III

ATACMS

Comanche

AerialCommonSensor

JSTARS

Prophet

Multi-MissionRadar

Global Hawk

IBS

Rivet Joint

NSANGICCIA

HomelandDefense

DOE DIA

NIMA

National Databases

NetworkedBattle

Command

Armed RoboticVehicle

Network

Recon &Surv Vehicle

C2Vehicle

APACHE

WIN-TAccess

A2C2S

DCGS

Integrating USN and USA Efforts

Maneuver

ISR

C2

Sustainment

Networked Fires

Patriot

MEADS

MLRS

FBCB2

MCS

FCS UE Complementary SystemsFCS UA Core/CP Systems

Joint Systems/Multi-national

JLENS

GMLRS

UAH

DCGS-AASAS

AFATDS

CSSCS

NFCS

Version 3/31/03

IAS

TES

C2 Constellation

DTSS

Profiler

IMETS

AMDWSFAADC2ADSI

JTAGSSentinel

TAIS

ADOCS

Paladin

BATES

Firefinder

ADLER

JSOF C2

MCTIS

JWARN

SECOMP-I

JMPS

DCTS

IMS

TBMCS

FORCEnet

GCSS-A

OneSAFWARSIM

CATT

CCTT

TSV

Yellow Text = Increment 2 interface

CA&PsyopVehicle

TESSDLS

AWACS

GES

GCCS-A JC2

C2

JNMS

TCO

SIMACET

C2PC

SJFHQ

LLAP/FAST

DCGS-A

GBS

GSTAMIDS

ASTAMIDS

MTS

TC-AIMS-II

F/A-22

BFT

WIN-T ACCESS (UA)

IDM AKMS DSN EKMS EPLRS SINCGARSWIN-T JTRSFASTLANE STEP/TeleportBVTC PPS-5SIPRNET NIPRNET

GMF SATCOMDRSNSMART-T STAR-T (Phoenix)

LFC2ISAMPS

GBS

SICFSIR

HEROS-2/1

ATacCS

ComBAT

WIN-T ACCESS (UE)

WIN-T Access WIN-T ACCESS (JIM)

WIN-T ACCESS

AWACS

ATIA

CTIA

MC4ADA

MFCS LAMPAM

NFCS

MIP

= indirect

interoperability

DJC2

SIGP NCES

SISP

SIAP

FTTS

FMTV

GCCS-J

FORCENET

NFCS

JC2

Present Info

FORCEnetFORCEnet C2 CONSTELLATIONC2 CONSTELLATIONOpen Architecture Sensor Net

Generate Info

Transport Info

USN - USAF Comm Integration

FIOP

E-2

AOC

Aegis

C2 Ship

EP-3

Shooters

Shooters

Satellite

CEC

U2

E-3Precision Targeting

Post/Process

Converging USN-USAF C4ISR Architectures

14

GIG Transformation Experiment (Sept 04)-Service participation in GIG Test Bed

-Service interoperability while transitioning to

GIG architecture (e.g. IPV6 service architectures)

TST Inter-Service Interoperability Experiment (Sep 04)-Realistic Time Sensitive Targeting / Precision Engagement

Simulation Experiment with multi-service labs and operators

-Examine concept/systems for Joint Networked Targeting

-Examine Interoperability and TT&P issues

Joint Rapid Architecture Experimentation

Army FCS/AEA

USAF Airborne C2 Constellation

NSA/IC NetworkTestbeds

DISA TeleportTest Locations

Navy FORCEnetTSAT Testbed (MIT/LL)• Optical Comm Testbed• RF Testbed• Network Testbed

DISA TerrestrialGIG-BE Test Segments

GIG Testbed•Optical Core (NRL)•ATD Net•BOSSnet

Enterprise Services Interoperability (Mar 04)-Joint Service Open Architecture Software Development-Publish and Subscribe

FORCEnet/FCS Interoperability (May/June 04)-Sharing Blue Force Tracking-Joint Tactical Digital Fires- Distributed Command and Control

JEFX Air Force/Army Experiment (July 04)-Close Air Support

-Blue Force Tracking

JTRS Testbeds(SSC, NRL, JTEL)



FORCEnetProcess for Iterative TransformationProcess for Iterative Transformation

Experimentation & Assessment ImplementationConcept DevelopmentCFFC, Fleets, NETWARCOM, OPNAV, ONR, NWDC, MCCDC, COEs, NPS

Fleets, NETWARCOM, CFFC, NWC, NWDC, MCCDC, TYCOMs, SYSCOMs, COEs, JFCOM, ONR

CFFC, OPNAV, NETWARCOM,SYSCOMs

DoctrineExp &Assess

Strategy/ Warfare

Challenges

Concept Generation

Enabling Technologies

OperationalArchitecture

Capability Increment

Concept Development

Basic Research

Exp &Assess

Exp &Assess

Exp &Assess

Capability Increment

Organization

Training

Material

Leadership

Personnel

Facilities

Fast Track - Sea Enterprise

Wargaming

CONOPS

DoD

Joint

SSG

Fleet

CCI

Liaison w/ Sea Warrior

S&T

POM

Input to OPNAV assessment

Disciplined Speed to Capability



FORCEnet

Requirements

Current

Future

Joint

Fleet

Acquisitionand

SYSCOMS

ONRDARPADOD

IndustryPrivateSector

AcademiaService LABS

Fleet

NWDC

COEs

Architectures

“AS IS”

“TO BE

AnalysisAnd

Assessments Experimentation

ExperimentVenues

ExerciseVenues

PrototypeEvaluations

Technologyand

Concepts

Gaps/Required Warfighting Capabilities

TechnologyConcepts

Capabilities

Immediate Needs and Issues

POR Fit & Shortfalls



FORCEnetFORCEnet FY 04 / FY 05 Experiment Plan

FY 2004J F M A M J J A S O N D

FY 2005J F M A M J J A S O N D O N D

FY 2003 A M J J A S

Joint/Service CD&E

Wargaming

PI 03

JFCOM MN LOE 3

Silent Hammer

Trident Warrior 04/Sea Viking 04

Fleet LOEs

Fn LOE 03-1

Fn LOE 03-3

Fn LOE 04-2 Prototype Path

JFMCC WG

UC 04 Title 10WG

JFTI RAP 1 / WARNET Demo (CG04)

FBE K Spiral 4 /Sea Viking AWE Part 2Fleet Battle

Experiments

Trident Warrior 05

Fn LOE 04-1

Fn LOE 05-2

Fn LOE 05-1

Spiral 2

ESG LOE WG

Fn Title X WG

Trident Warrior 04 WG

Trident Warrior 05 WG

Spiral 3

JFTI / JNTC RAP 2

Global Engagement VII

JFCOM JCD WG

JEFX 04

APTX 05

ATEX 05CIE LOE

(Trident Warrior 03)

FORCEnet Enabling

FORCEnet Sea Trial

JCD&E

FORGER LOE



FORCEnetFnEP ConceptFnEP Concept

FORCEnet EngagementPack Relationships

Aut

o. B

att.

Man

. Aid

sA

uto.

Bat

t. M

an. A

ids

Inte

grat

ed F

ire C

ontr

olIn

tegr

ated

Fire

Con

trol

Com

posi

te T

rack

ing

Com

posi

te T

rack

ing

Com

posi

te C

om

bat

ID

Com

posi

te C

om

bat

ID

Sin

gle/

Com

mon

Pic

sS

ingl

e/C

omm

on P

ics

FORCEnet Engagement “Pack”Engage “On Demand”Engage “On Demand”

WarriorsWarriors SensorsSensors NetworksNetworks Comm &Control

Comm &Control PlatformsPlatforms WeaponsWeapons

FORCEnet FactorsFORCEnet Factors



FORCEnetFnEP StrategyAligning Programs Using the Fn Services and Contribution to Capability

FnEP StrategyAligning Programs Using the Fn Services and Contribution to Capability

4. Analysis• Gap / Overlap

Analysis • Dynamic Models

1.Establish the Architecture (FORCEnet)

FO

RC

En

et

Ser

vic

es

2. Group Systems & Solutions

5. Portfolio of Solutions & Requirements

System Programs

$$$$$

Integrated Joint /

FORCEnet

$$

3. Decompose into SF/IE categories

Transformation Process

GEMINII & Associated Tools

Sensor

CT

CCID

CTP

ABMA

IFC

WPN

COP

MP

PNT

Fn IG



FORCEnetWhat You should Know about Fn

Engagement PacksWhat You should Know about Fn

Engagement Packs

• ForceNet is Network Centric Warfighting– FnEP Focuses on Engagement Capabilities, Consists of Operational Activities and CRC’s desired

to yield Engagement Capability– FnEP Requirements:

• Adaptable – Multi-mision focus (e.g. TAMD/STRIKE)• Compose-able Distributed Sensor- Weapon Target Pairing (no longer platform constrained)

– CRC’s Defined:• Composite Tracking – “Sensor Management and Control”

– Distributed sensors – access to multiple sensor data• Composite Combat Identification (CCID) – ID Management and Control

– Common Shared Combat ID (red, blue, and orange) • Common Picture – Track Control

– Tactical level Common shared Management and Track Level Operational Pictures w/ Integrated Track Management

• Automated Battle Management Aids (ABMA) – Battle Space Management– Composeable, Adaptable, Redundant, Distributed Command & Control

• Integrated Fire Control – Weapons Management and Control– Distributed Weapons management & Control – Compose weapon – C2 combinations



FORCEnetPOM Process FunctionsPOM Process Functions

Warfighting(Campaign)

Analysis

N6/N7 SPP

Transformation Roadmap

ISCP• Investment Priorities• Capability Balance

4NCP

StrategicGuidance

S & TAssessment

Force Structure & Munitions (NNOR)

Analyses

ForceCapabilit

yMetrics

ProgramGuidance

• Phase I, II, I II BDA• MEA• Target nominations• Special Studies

• Maritime CTL• Phase I, II BDA

• Propose targets• Track JFLCC Targets• Phase I, II BDA• MEA

• Target study• Point mensuration• No strike lists• Target materials• Phase I, II, I II BDA

• Phase II BDA;Combat Assessment

• CDL, JNFL, Pre-planned JTL

• Target materials• Target nomination

• Phase I , II BDA; MEA• Tgt. Folders;weaponeering• ATO, JTl

J FC(J OC/ J I C)

J FLCC(ACE)

WOCMAW

J FMCC

F2C2

DCCC

DIA

NMJ IC

J FSOCC

J FACC(AOC)

• Phase I BDA

• Phase I BDA

• Coalition Coordination

Caveats:• Extract fromUSCENTCOM Objective Architecture Concerning Targeting – November 1997 Draft• Nodes; info. exchanges; functions shown do not represent a complete set

MIDBChanges

TargetNominations

BDA Reports(imagery/text)

• BDA Reports (imagery/text)

• Collection Requirements


• Target materials/analysis• BDA Reports (imagery/text)

CollectionRequirements

• Weapon System Video• MISREPs• Combat Reports• Munitions Effects• Target nominations• Target material requests

• Target materials/analysis• BDA Reports (imagery/text)


• Enemy Force Effectiveness• Collection Requirements• Target Nominations • BDA Reports

(imagery/text)

• Weapon System Video• MISREPs• Combat Reports• Munitions Effects• Target nominations• Target material requests• Collection Requirements

A1 A2 A3

A1.2 A3.1 A3.2A1.1

A3.2.1 A3.2.2

A0

ActivityHierarchy

ActivityDiagram

A1

A2

A3

EVENTS/TIME

NODES

NODE 1 NODE 2 NODE 3

EVENT 1

EVENT 2

EVENT 3

EVENT 4 EVENT 5

EVENT 6

EVENT 7 EVENT 8

time 1

time 2

time 3

time 3'

{formula relatingtime 3 to time 3'}

time n

{formula relatingtime 1 to time 2}SATCOM Interface

NODE A

NODE B

NODE C

SYSTEM

2

SYSTEM1

SYSTEM1

SYSTEM3

SYSTEM

4

EXTERNALCONNECTION

SYSTEM1

SYSTEM

2

COMMS Interface

F/A-18A/BF/A-18A/B

Navy Tankers4

E-2CE-2C

F-14DF-14D

F-14A, BF-14A, B

Tactical SurveilP-3C S-3BSH-60 UAVsetc.

Tactical SurveilP-3C S-3BSH-60 UAVsetc.

EA-6BEA-6B

ARC

C2WC3

ASUWC

ASWC

F/A-18 C/D, E/F

JFACCJFACCJFMCCJFMCC

JFLCC JFSOCCJFSOCCNATO Allies

Coalition Allies

JFCJOCJIC

JFCJOCJIC

CWCCWC ACAACAAADCAADC

SWC

A JMA JM

Joint ElementsNational Theater

DSP SOF OTHR HFDF ASW ArraysFOSICs/FOSIFsetc

E-31 U-2RRC-

135V2 EP-3ES-3AUAVsTankers4

Ships6

Subs6 etc

Joint ElementsNational Theater

DSP SOF OTHR HFDF ASW ArraysFOSICs/FOSIFsetc

E-31 U-2RRC-

135V2 EP-3ES-3AUAVsTankers4

Ships6

Subs6 etc

AAWC

AEGIS Cruiser: CG-47 Class*(Alternate, CV)

CICAAWC

AEGIS Cruiser: CG-47 Class*(Alternate, CV)

CIC

A J NM

Z

A C M

A J N M Z

A J NM

Z

A C M

A J N M Z

USAFControlE-31 CRCCRE

WeaponsF-15 F-16

ForceAOC

USAFControlE-31 CRCCRE

WeaponsF-15 F-16

ForceAOC

ControlE-31 CRCCRE

WeaponsF-15 F-16

ForceAOC

AEGISDestroyers

DDG-51

AEGISCruisers

CG-47

AircraftCarriers

CV

Other AAWShips

CGN-36/38, DDG-993

Other AAWShipsFFG-7

OtherShips

AEGISDestroyers

DDG-51

AEGISCruisers

CG-47

AircraftCarriers

CV

Other AAWShips

CGN-36/38, DDG-993

Other AAWShipsFFG-7

OtherShips

ForceAAMDC FPTOC

Control WeaponsArmy

ForceAAMDC FPTOC

Control WeaponsForceAAMDC FPTOC

Control WeaponsArmy

USMCForceTACC

ControlTAOC / SAAWC /

EWC

WeaponsF/A-18AV-8BHAWK TMDD

USMCForceTACC

ControlTAOC / SAAWC /

EWC

WeaponsF/A-18AV-8BHAWK TMDD

Near Term Operations as of 2003 -- Major Regional Conflict -- Theater Air and Missile Defense functions Sources: Ref J6, J13, J62, J84, J94, J97, N3, N10, N11, N14, N1 6, N27, F1, B17, R8, R16, S11, S14-S24 Notes for Navy Charts1 AWACS 2 RIVET JOINT3 Formerly EWC 4 Aerial Refueling Aircraft 5 May be indirect via Fleet gatew ay6 “Ships” & “Subs” refers to vessels, which although not an integral part of the Joint Force, are tasked to provide surveillance

Unclassified

InvestmentStrategy

SYSCOMAssessments

MCPMCPMission Area

Analysis

SEA ENTERPRISE

FORCEnetConcept &

OperationalArchitecture



FORCEnet

Framework&

Principals

ArchitectureVision

(Viewpoint)Capability

Metrics

ReferenceImplementation

ArchitectureAssessments

PortfolioOf Solutions

MigrationStrategy

ImplementationGovernance

Requirements

ArchitectureMaintenance

Capability Metrics, Illustrating Issues

Architecture views(OV’s. SV’s. TV’s)• Dependencies

Static: Functionality / InteroperabilityDynamic: Capability MetricsCosts / Value/Benefit/Utility/ETE Functionality

Bundles/ Engagement Packs, and Portfolios of Systems in To-Be architectureFnEP Solution Sets• # consumers, Program Viability, Volatility

Prioritization, Sequencing of systemDeployment (CED?)• How Much And When?

Planning, Procurement,Acquisition, and Deployment Governance

Timeframe, Scope,Boundary, and Context

FnEP Definition & Development Process: GEMINIIFnEP Definition & Development Process: GEMINIIWARFARE

DEVELOPMENT

Tech push

Capabilities pull

S&T

PPBS

NDIA SLAAD FORCEnet Innovation and Experimentation Brief CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo” Deputy...

Documents

Transcript of NDIA SLAAD FORCEnet Innovation and Experimentation Brief CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo” Deputy...