NCLB Performance Report · No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act Performance Report For Funds FY 2011...

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) ActPerformance ReportFor Funds FY 2011

School Year 2010-2011

NAME OF UNIT Regional School Unit

#78 RangeleyUNIT ADDRESS 43 Mendolia Rd. Rangeley, ME 4970TELEPHONE # 207.864.3311FAX # 207.864.2451

NAME OF CONTACTPERSON Sharon ConnallySCHOOL/DISTRICTOFFICE Rangeley Lakes Regional SchoolADDRESS 43 Mendolia Rd. Rangeley, ME 4970TELEPHONE # 207.864.3311 ext. 104FAX # 207.864.2451E-MAIL [email protected]

This report contains the most accurate data available to the Local Educational Agency.

For Information Call:

Title IA 624-6705Title IIA 624-6830Title IID 624-6815Title III 624-6788Title IVA 287-6475Title V/REAP-Flex 624-6815Technology Plans 287-5627FAX #: 624-6706

USDE Grant Awards for the following programs:Title IA-Basic DisadvantagedTitle IIA- Teacher QualifyTitle IID - Ed Tech (Technology)Title III - Language Instruction for LEP & Immigrant StudentsTitle IVA - Safe & Drug Free Schools & Communities ActTitle V - Innovative EducationREAP - Rural Education Achievement Program

Certified by Electronic Signature on 07/19/2011 Brian Foster Superintendent [email protected]

Maine Department of EducationNCLB Clearinghouse23 State House StationAugusta, ME 04333-0023

Due: August 1, 2011Or 30 days after the close of any NCLBFunded Summer Programming.

(Send letter to NCLB Clearinghouse or [email protected] with summer programending date.)

NCLB Performance Report https://www.4pcamaine.org/NCLBPR/FY2012/data_entry/nclb_a...

1 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

NCLB Act Title IV-A Gun-Free Schools ReportSchool Year 2010-2011(Public Schools Only)

The Federal Gun Free Schools Act, (part of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002, Public Law 107-110,Title IV, Part A, Section 4141), and Maine state law, (20-A MRSA, Section 1001, subpart-9A, StudentsExpelled or Suspended under the Requirements of the Federal Gun-Free Schools Act), requires thatlocal educational agencies do the following:

Expel from school for a period of not less than 1 year a student who is determined to havebrought a firearm* to a school, or to have possessed a firearm at a school, (except that thefederal and state laws shall allow the chief administering officer of such local educationalagency to modify such expulsion requirement for a student on a case-by-case basis), that theyreport the incident to the criminal justice or juvenile delinquency system, and that they providethe Maine Department of Education with annual documentation of the incident.

*Refer to the blue HELP link on this page for firearm definitions. GUN-FREE SCHOOL REPORTHELP

Please complete questions I, II, and III and submit this form as part of the annual NCLB PerformanceReport due on August 1, 2011

I. Were there any firearm incidents in your local educational agency during the 2010-2011 school year?I.

Yes No If the answer is "Yes", a table is displayed below to be completed, one line perstudent involved and expelled..

Does your local educational agency have in place a policy to assure compliance with the expulsionrequirements under the laws referenced at the top of this form?

II.

Yes No

Does your local educational agency have in place a policy to assure compliance with the referral tocriminal justice or juvenile delinquency system requirement under the laws referenced at the top of thisform?

III.

Yes No

School Unit(s): Regional School Unit #78 RangeleyName of Reporting Official: Brian FosterTitle: SuperintendentDate: 2011-06-22 Phone Number: 207.864.3311


2 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

Submit this page to confirm there are no projects.


3 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

Submit this page to confirm there are no School-wide projects.


4 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

NCLB Set-aside Project Sheet for FY2011 TITLE IAUnit Regional School Unit #78 Rangeley Project Title: Homeless

Project Description:1.

The Title I co-ordinator will identify homeless students. A needs assessment will be conducted reneeded services. Identified services will the be provided to students using the most appropriateprogram(s) that best meet their unique needs

Goals: What specific goal(s) has been established to meet this need(s)?2.

Identified students will attend school 90% of the time based upon attendance records

Evaluation of Outcomes/Performance Indicators: (Provide specific data results)3.

Attendance records of identifed homeless students indicate attendance 90% of the time.

Were all the anticipated outcomes met?4.

Yes Describe in the box below any Title IA program change that needs to be made based on thedata.

No Describe in the box below any Title IA program change that needs to be made based on thedata. If no program change will be made, why not? A strong rationale must be provided if a similaractivity is planned for the 2011-2012 school year.

No changes at this time.

Actual Project Expenditures Use whole dollars only (no cents)5.

5a. Title IA NCLB Allocation:

BudgetItem

1000, 2000Salaries &Benefits

3000Contracts

5000Travel

6000Supp/Books

7000Equipment

7300Capital

Equipment

8000Other Total

ApplicationEstimate $0 $0 $0 $50 $0 $0 $0 $50

ActualExpenditure

0 0 0 50 0 0 0 50

NCLB Set-aside Project Sheet for FY2011 TITLE IAUnit Regional School Unit #78 Rangeley Project Title: Highly Qualified Teachers


No title I funds are needed - we have sufficient funds in the local budget

Goals: What specific goal(s) has been established to meet this need(s)?2.

100% of teachers who teach core academic subjects must meet highly qualified requirements underNCLB


100% of teachers who teach core academic subjects currently meet highly qualified requirementsunder NCLB.


5 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM




No changes at this time.

Actual Project Expenditures Use whole dollars only (no cents)5.

5a. Title IA NCLB Allocation:

BudgetItem


3000Contracts

5000Travel

6000Supp/Books

7000Equipment

7300Capital

Equipment

8000Other Total

ApplicationEstimate $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

ActualExpenditure

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


6 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

NCLB Project Performance Report for FY2011 TITLE IAUnit Regional School Unit #78 Rangeley Project Title: Supplemental Instruction for Literacy

This is NOT a REAP-FLEX Project1.


Improve reading stratagies for Grade K-5 low achievers. Students that are recommended to theprogram by their classroom teachers are scheduled throughout the school year for one on oneinstruction with a highly qualified reading teacher. Lexia, a Reading software program will bepurchased for students K-5 as an intervention program.

Anticipated Outcomes/Performance Indicators: (From your original project sheet)2.

70% of students involved will be reading at grade level as measured by DRA or Rigby

80% of students involved will show improvement as measure by Rigby or DRA


61% of students involved are reading at grade level as measured by the DRA. 100% of studentsinvolved showed improvement as measured by the DRA.




The Title IA program will be changed to meet anticipated outcomes by increasing the amount of timestudents receive intervention through Lexia and direct instruction. Increased time on Lexia andadditional time receiving direct instructional support will increase the growth of the 9% of the studentsthat did not meet grade level expectations.

Actual Project Expenditures: Use whole dollars only (no cents)5.

5a. Title IA NCLB Allocation

FY 2112, Regional School Unit #78 Rangeley, NCLB Funding for Supplemental Instructionfor Literacy

BudgetItem


3000Contracts

5000Travel

6000Supp/Books

7000Equipment

7300Capital

Equipment

8000Other Total

ApplicationEstimate $59,000 $0 $0 $1,250 $0 $0 $0 $60,250

ActualExpenditure

59000 0 0 1250 0 0 0 60250

NCLB Project Performance Report for FY2011 TITLE IAUnit Regional School Unit #78 Rangeley Project Title: Supplemental Instruction for Math



Improve math stratagies for Grade K-5 low achievers. Students that are recommended to the programby their classroom teachers are scheduled throughout the school year for one on one instruction with ahighly qualified math teacher. iSucceed will be purchased for K-5 students.


7 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

Increase mathematical skills of low achievers in K-5


80% of participating students will reach a score appropriate to their grade level as measured by theNWEA exam


One out of thirteen students met grade level expectations in math according to the NWEA. 100% of thestudents made growth according to the NWEA. 46% of the students met their individual end of the yeartrajectory score.




The Title IA program will be changed to meet anticipated outcomes by increasing the amount of timestudents receive intervention through iXL and direct instruction. Increased time on iXL and additionaltime receiving direct instructional support will increase the growth of the students who did not meetgrade level expectations.



FY 2112, Regional School Unit #78 Rangeley, NCLB Funding for Supplemental Instructionfor Math

BudgetItem


3000Contracts

5000Travel

6000Supp/Books

7000Equipment

7300Capital

Equipment

8000Other Total

ApplicationEstimate $21,000 $0 $0 $685 $0 $0 $0 $21,685

ActualExpenditure

21000 0 0 685 0 0 0 21685

NCLB Project Performance Report for FY2011 TITLE IAUnit Regional School Unit #78Rangeley

Project Title: Supplemental Instruction for Math andLiteracy




8 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

Identified students shall recieve supplemental instruction in those areas deeded as insufficient ascompared to peers in the Title I Program.One-on-one assistance shall be provided to those students inorder to ensure that their specific goalsare met


Identfied students will be pre and post evaulated after each seesion to determine progress andunderstanding . THe goal being to have each student meet the same standards and measurementspresented to their peers.


Pre- and post-evaluations are ongoing for students needing supplemental instruction. Title I studentsare held to the same standards as their peers.




No changes will be made at this time.



FY 2112, Regional School Unit #78 Rangeley, NCLB Funding for Supplemental Instructionfor Math and Literacy

BudgetItem


3000Contracts

5000Travel

6000Supp/Books

7000Equipment

7300Capital

Equipment

8000Other Total

ApplicationEstimate $20,600 $0 $0 $684 $0 $0 $0 $21,284

ActualExpenditure

20600 0 0 684 0 0 0 21284


9 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

NCLB Project Sheet for FY2011 Teacher Quality - TITLE IIA - PDRegional School Unit #78 Rangeley Project: Improving Instruction


The Staff Development Planning Team will establish activities, dates, times for each of the venueslisted above

Goals:2.

1. To ensure taht all RLRS staff meet HQ status

2. To ensure that all teachers meet the State of Maine Competency Standards fdor Teachers

3. To ensure that all RLRS Student meet ot exceed the Maine Learning Results as measured at eachgrade level

Outcomes/Performance Indicators:3.

If this goal is achieved, what changes in teacher effectiveness, knowledge and skills do youexpect to occur and how will you measure these changes?

A.

1.Teacher evaluations will focus on the implementation of skills learned in SD activities intoclassroominstruction.

2. The SD Team will provide exit evaluations to all participants after each SD session

NCLB Goal 3 By 2005-2006, all students will be taught by highly qualified teachers.B. Objective 3.1 Increase the percentage of classes being taught by teachers who are highly

qualified in the core academic areas both the aggregate and in high povertyschools

Objective 3.2 Increase the percentage of paraprofessionals with instructional duties (excludingthose with sole duties as translators and parental involvement assistants andpersonal assistants) who are highly qualified.

Evaluation of Outcomes/Performance Indicators: (Provide specific data results for each outcomelisted in Item #4)

4.

Teacher evaluations focused on implementation of skills learned in staff development activities. Exitevaluations were conducted with all participants through exit interviews. By the end of the school year2010-2011 100% of teaching staff will highly qualified. 100% of paraprofessionals with instructionalduties are highly qualified.


Yes Describe in the box below any Title IIA program change that needs to be made based on thedata.

No Describe in the box below any Title IIA program change that needs to be made based on thedata. If no program change will be made, why not? A strong rationale must be provided if a similaractivity is planned for the 2011-2012 school year.No changes will be made at this time.


BudgetItem


3000Contracts

5000Travel

6000Supp/Books

7000Equipment

7300Capital

Equipment

8000Other Total

ApplicationEstimate $0 $8,000 $8,902 $0 $0 $16,902


10 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

ActualExpenditure

0 8000 8902 0 0 16902


11 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM



12 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM



13 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM



14 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM



15 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

$50$0

$21,284$60,250$21,685

$16,902

NCLB Summary of Project Totals By Title - School Year 2010-2011Unit Regional School Unit #78 Rangeley Contact Person: Sharon Connally Phone 207.864.3311 ext. 104EmailActual expenditures can be rounded to nearest dollar. An "R" in Row (d) after an amount indicates the funds were used under the REAP-FLEXoption. Title IA

DisadvantedIIA

Teacher QualityIID

Ed TechIVA

Safe & DrugTotals

(a) Original Allocation $103,269 $16,902 $0 $0 $120,171

(b) Funds TransferredUse (+) or (-) between Titles(NO REAP-FLEX)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

(c) Allocation--- Or ---Adjusted Totals Row(a) plus or minus Row (b)

$103,269 $16,902 $0 $0 $120,171

(d) Individual ProjectExpendituresThese amounts match theProject Total from eachPerformance Report Page

$120,171

(e) Expenditure TotalsSum of Project expenditureslisted in Row (d)

$103,269 $16,902 $0 $0 $120,171

(f) FY11 CARRYOVER Row(c) Allocation minus Row (e)Expenditure Totals(f) = (c) - (e)

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0


16 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

TITLE I 2010-2011 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTING Unit Regional School Unit #78 RangeleyThis section covers Title IA projects carried out during school year 2010-2011.Note: Cooperative projects are to be reported as a single school unit.

PART I: SCHOOL INFORMATION

Part I requires the reporting of the number of schools operating targeted assistance programs and thenumber of schoolwide programs.

TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS (TAS) Schools that are ineligible for or that choose not to operatea schoolwide program may use Title IA funds only for programs that provide services to eligible childrenidentified as having the greatest need for special assistance in accordance with your Title IA StudentSelection Policy.

SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS (SWP) Title IA funds may be used, in combination with other Federal,State, and local funds, in order to upgrade the entire educational program of a school if at least 40% ofthe children were from low-income families and the school has an approved schoolwide plan on file withthe State Title I Office.

Part I also requires documentation of the number of Title IA schools offering extended learningopportunities to its Title IA eligible students.

Provide the following information about your schools: Title IA

TAS SWP*

Number of schools operating a Title IA program 1 0

Number of schools that were in Schoolwide planning year 0

* To operate a Schoolwide Program (SWP), you must have had a year of planning and a school board-approved schoolwide plan on file at the IASA Clearinghouse in Augusta.

TITLE I 2010-2011 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTING Unit Regional School Unit #78 RangeleyPART II: TITLE IA STUDENT INFORMATION FOR THE REGULAR SCHOOL YEAR (including SummerSchool)

This report requires a breakdown of students who received REGULAR and/or EXTENDED YEAR (includingSummer School) Title IA services by gender, racial/ethnic group, and by special services/programs. Genderand racial/ethnic groups should include all Title IA students served including those students receiving Title Iservices from the special programs noted below. This is an unduplicated count.

NUMBER OF STUDENTS SERVED BYGENDER WITH TITLE IA $

TITLE IA NonPublic

Schools

TOTAL

TAS SWP*

Male 11 0 0 11

Female 17 0 0 17

Total 28 0 0 28

NUMBER OF STUDENTS SERVED BYETHNIC GROUP W/ IA $

TITLE IA NonPublic

Schools

TOTAL

TAS SWP*

American Indian or Alaskan Native 0 0 0 0

Asian 0 0 0 0

Black (not Hispanic) 0 0 0 0

Hispanic 0 0 0 0


17 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0

White (not Hispanic) 28 0 0 28

Two or more races 0 0 0 0

Total 28 0 0 28

NUMBER OF TITLE IA PARTICIPANTS BYSPECIAL SERVICES/PROGRAMS

TITLE IA TOTALTAS SWP*

Local Neglected Students 0 0These studentcounts are asubset and

are includedin the

Gender/Ethnicgroups above.

Students w/ Disabilities (Has IEP on file) 3 0

Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Students 1 0

Homeless Students 4 0

Migrant Students 0 0

* This count should include all students enrolled in those schools that have a school board-approvedschoolwide plan on file at the NCLB Clearinghouse in Augusta.

TITLE I 2010-2011 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTING Unit Regional School Unit #78 RangeleyTitle IA Supplemental Section 2010-2011.

This section requires information on the number of students who received Title IA services by age/grade,and institutional designation. Include all children receiving Title IA funded instructional and/or support servicesduring the regular and extended school year. The first four categories require an unduplicated count andthe total is equivalent to the gender and ethnicity total on previous page.

Then provide a break down for the summer school category. The summer school column will refer to all TitleIA summer school students.

By Grade TAS SWP Non Public Title IASummer School

Ages 0-2* 0 0 0 0

Ages 3-5* 0 0 0 0

K 2 0 0 0

1 6 0 0 3

2 4 0 0 2

3 5 0 0 2

4 1 0 0 0

5 5 0 0 1

6 0 0 0 0

7 2 0 0 0

8 3 0 0 0

9 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0

11 0 0 0 0

12 0 0 0 0


18 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

Ungraded 0 0 0 0

SUBTOTALS 28 0 0 8

Total** 28 8

* These counts include preschool children below the kindergarten level**Equals the TOTALS for gender and ethnicity.

TITLE I 2010-2011 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTING Unit Regional School Unit #78 RangeleyTitle IA Services 2010-2011.

This section requires a reporting of the kinds of services paid for with Title IA funds which Title IA studentsreceived during the regular school year, by institutional designation. Services may include both instructionaland support services, so there may be a duplicate count.

INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES PAID FOR WITH IA $

TITLE IAPublic TAS Non-Public

# of Students # of Students

Reading/Language Arts 23 0

Science 0 0

Mathematics 17 0

Reading Recovery® 0 0

Other (Specify)

0 0

SUPPORT SERVICES PAID FOR W/ TITLE IA FUNDS

TITLE IAPublic TAS Non-Public

Supporting Guidance/Advocacy 0 0

Health/Dental/Eye Care 0 0

Dropout Prevention 0 0

Other (Specify)

0 0

TITLE I 2010-2011 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTING Unit Regional School Unit #78 RangeleyPART III: TITLE IA STAFF INFORMATION.

This section requires a listing of Title IA staff paid with Title IA funds, by full-time equivalent and jobclassification, who were employed during the regular school year. This may include staff in non-public andschoolwide programs as well as targeted assistance programs.

FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) is the amount of time per week actually spent on an activity divided bythe amount of time per week normally considered as full-time for that activity. FTE should be expressedas a decimal fraction to the nearest tenth. To calculate the number of FTE staff members in eachcategory, determine the number of hours paid with Title IA funds that each staff member in that categoryworks in a week. Add these numbers together and divide the total by the number of hours that represents"full time" to get the FTE number for that staff category.

Example: 35 hour week = FTE7 educational technicians each work 10 hours per weektotal number of hours worked is 7 ed techs X 10 hours = 70 hours70 hours / 35 hours = 2.0 FTE educational technicians

JOB CLASSIFICATION TITLE IA/ID Staff Report FTEs for staff paid with Title IA FUNDS # of Regular Term FTEs

Administrators (Non-clerical) 0.00


19 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

Teachers 1.40

Educational Technicians I 0.00

Educational Technicians II 1.10

Educational Technicians III 0.00

Staff providing support services (Non-clerical) 0.00

Staff providing support services (Clerical) 0.00

Other (Specify) 0.00

Highly Qualified Paraprofessionals: The following information will be used to report the percentage of TitleIA targeted and schoolwide program paraprofessionals (Educational Technicians) who meet the federal highlyqualified paraprofessional requirements under Section 1119 of the No Child Left Behind Act. These numbersrepresent individuals and should include both part-time and full-time staff. This is not a FTE count.

IA

(A) Number of paraprofessionals (Educational Technicians) paid in whole or in part with TitleIA funds in a targeted assistance program (TAS).

#1

(B) Of the number in (A) above, how many meet the Title IA requirements for highly qualifiedparaprofessionals under section 1119?

#1

C) Total number of all paraprofessionals (Educational Technicians) in a school operating aschoolwide program (SWP). Only schools with a board approved and DOE accepted SWPplan should respond to this question.

#0

(D) Of the number in (C) above, how many meet the Title IA requirements for highly qualifiedparaprofessionals under section 1119?

#0

Staff Information from FY2011 NCLB Consolidated Application


20 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

NCLB Supplemental Report 2010-2011 Teacher Quality - TITLE IIA - PDRegional School Unit #78 Rangeley Project # 1: Improving Instruction

Number (#) of Participating Teachers Percentage of targeted teachers who have participated in this trainingGr. K - 5 Gr. 6 - 8 Gr. 9 - 12

9 6 9 100.0

What was the maximum number of contact hours available per participant 0I.

What was the time period (i.e. days, weeks, months) over which the project took place?

months 10

II.

Directions: Below are listed eleven professional development strategies. Check each of the strategiesthat was utilized in this project.

Immersion in problem-solving and/or inquiry Immersion into the world of mathematics and/or science Curriculum implementation Curriculum replacement units Action Research Case Discussions Examining student work Partnerships with professionals in business, industry, and universities Professional networks Coaching and mentoring Study groups Workshops, institutes, courses, and seminars; Technology for professional learning Developing professional developers

III.

Title IIA 2010-2011 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTING Unit Regional School Unit #78 RangeleyNotifications to Parents That They May Request Teacher Professional Qualifications

1. Did you send out notifications to parents in Title I schools that informs them that they may request teacherprofessional qualifications? Yes No

2. Copy and paste information here

Rangeley Lakes Regional School

LETTER TO PARENTSHIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHER INFORMATIONFor Title I Schools and Programs Only(Parent Notice That They May Request Information)

Dear Parent/Guardian:

We at Rangeley Lakes Regional School are sending you this information as one way to fulfill ourobligations under the "Parents' Right to Know" requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind Act(NCLB). Under these requirements, teachers must meet general qualifications as well as the specificrequirements of the subject they are teaching. This means we will be informing parents whenever achild is taught for four consecutive weeks by a teacher who does not meet the new federal definition of"Highly Qualified".

Maine has some of the most qualified teachers in the country, and we are extremely proud of ourteaching staff. We work hard to assure that every class has a teacher with the appropriate background,experience, and credentials for his or her current teaching assignment.

We believe that a caring, competent, and qualified teacher for every child is the most importantingredient in education reform, and we want to assure you that we consider all our teachers to be fully


21 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

qualified for their positions. All of our teachers are currently entitled to teach under Maine's strictcertification requirements. All of our teachers have college degrees and many have advanced degrees.In addition, every teacher continues his or her own learning through professional developmentactivities and our teachers are evaluated each year to make sure that their teaching skills remain at thehighest possible level.

Most teachers already meet the federal definition of "Highly Qualified". Those teachers who do notmeet this federal standard will be able to do so by engaging in additional professional development orby passing a test. These teachers will have until the end of the 2005 – 2006 school year to do so.

Additional information on the NCLB Act, as well as on the qualifications of your child's teacher isavailable on request. Please contact ___________________________________at (phone#__________________) if you have questions or would like further information. Working with parentsis an important aspect of our efforts to help students learn and we welcome your interest.

Sincerely,

__________________________Principal


22 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

Title IID Supplemental Questions For 2010-2011

Instructions: For the school year 2010-11, please respond to the following questions for your SAU or co-op,if you complete a cooperative application and performance report. Use the best data you have available atthis point in time. Use your best estimate for questions 4 and 5 if the data is not readily available. Thisinformation is being used to support the evaluation component for our Statewide Title IID NationalPerformance Report and EDFacts collections. Please contact Dennis Kunces at 624-6815 or email him [email protected] if you have any questions on this form.

SAU: Regional School Unit #78 Rangeley

If this application is a co-op, enter the number of SAUs being reported on this one form. 1

Please check one button to indicate which level best identifies where you believe your entire SAU is inrelationship to integrating technology into instruction.

Developing: Limited use of technology; a few applications are used by staff and students; thosewho do use technology are experimenting and using it mostly for automation; student technologyintegration elements and or district goals for technology integration are largely unmet.

Approaching: Moderate use of technology by a fair number of staff and students; most teachersand students are learning how to integrate technology and a few staff and students are at a high levelof practice and integration; some technology integration elements and/or district goals for technologyare being met.

Meets: Many staff and students make use of a number of different technologies and applicationsand some are at a high level of integration; the minimum elements of integration and minimum goalsfor curricular integration and staff development are being met.

Fully Integrated: Most staff and students are at a high level of understanding and practice; most ofthe goals for curricular integration and most elements for student integration are being exceeded.

Comments

1.

Has your SAU complied with the requirement to permit 7th and 8th grade students to take home MLTIlaptop computers home to support their learning?

Yes No, we have not complied with the requirement Not applicable, no 7th or 8th grade in our SAU.

Comments

2.

Check any of the grades for which you offer true one-to-one computing (not carts for some classes) Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12

Comments

3.

Fill in the number of fully working Internet accessible computers and the number of students for eachschool in the SAU (co-op).

School Name ComputersDesktops, laptops

or Netbooks1

ThinClient2

Other devices thatconnect to the

internet3

InteractiveWhiteboards4

Students

RangeleyLakes RegionalSchool

150 0 5 13 198

4.

We have 24 K-12 teachers in our SAU (co-op). The number fully trained in the Inquiry Based

Instructional Model 5 using technology as a problem-solving tool is 12 . (# of teachers)

5.

The total number of 8th grade students who were evaluated for "Technical Literacy" 6 by the end of the

school year was 0 . The number deemed by the district to be "Technically Literate" 7 was

0 .

6.


23 of 23 3/9/12 2:10 PM

NCLB Performance Report · No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act Performance Report For Funds FY 2011...

Documents

Transcript of NCLB Performance Report · No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act Performance Report For Funds FY 2011...