NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM POM 06 BRIEF
description
Transcript of NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM POM 06 BRIEF
1
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAMPOM 06 BRIEF
Ed Chergoski
NAVSEA 04L52
04 November 2003
2
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
NSWC Seal BeachEngineering and
Technical SpecificationsProcurement
Training Liaison Program Office Support
NAVSEA 04L52PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
NSWC Earle
SPETERL to COSAL conversion
Allowancing &Configuration Mgt
NSWC Corona
Calibration Standards Allowancing and
ProcurementICP Development
NAVSEA Budget Specialist Gail Miller
3
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Team ConstructIHD Det Earle IHD Det Seal Beach NSWC CoronaJohn Lupi (90%) Steve Makieil (100%) Len Rice (9%)
Joe Teti (100%) Kathy Saunders (80%) Kathy Ingenhousz (94%)
Rich Devenero (100%) Mark McHugh (100%)
Ernie Davison (100%) Steve Mosczynski (100%)
Donna Morse (100%) Greg Hogan (100%)
Iksang Ro (5%)
Program SupportDennis Kelly (100%)
4
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Annual Maintenance Expenditure on GPETE
N76$22.64M
55%
N75$6.76M16%
N78$5.87M14%
N77$2.35M
6%
N06$2.42M
6%
N96$21K.05%
N04$391K1%
N42$742K2%
5
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Expenditure Breakdown
$24,487,092.38
$3,671,196.36
$13,041,711.25
Calibration
Repair
BER
6
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Priority Functional Group Annual Maintenance Average Cost per Unit
1 Signal Generator $5,382,838.49 $5,289.17
2 DMM $4,301,951.42 $503.92
3 Baseband Generator $3,722,906.30 $1,032.23
4 Synchro Indicator $3,520,850.94 $1,337.19
5 Spectrum Analyzer $2,197,164.55 $2,802.43
6 Calibrator $2,111,725.80 $4,925.84
7 Logic Analyzer $1,952,713.16 $3,023.59
8 Oscilloscopes $1,801,961.62 $962.43
9 Voltmeter $1,498,560.14 $1,293.58
10 Frequency $1,229,301.89 $918.69
11 LAN/WAN $1,178,429.61 $3,778.66
This denotes the total annual costs by functional group including calibration and repair, and then, for those that are bolded, reprioritized based on Fleet requests that the TMDE program resolve issues with problematic or obsolete groups of equipment
7
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Mechanics of analysis
• POM construct was based on individual GPETE model reliability and maintenance cost, ‘Cost of Ownership’.
• MOCC data from 1998 through mid-2003 was used to derive 3 values for each individual model number:
• Repair (Failure Rate): likelihood that a model would fail calibration or be submitted for repair (expressed as percentile)
• Calibration: average hours expended to calibrate a given model
• Beyond Economical Repair (BER): model submitted for calibration fails (is rejected), is submitted for repair, and shows no completed repair, subsequent calibration, or recall date (expressed as count). Cost is projected as outright procurement cost for standard model in the SCAT.
• Based on these 3 values, the annualized costs of maintaining the Navy inventory, as reported by TEMIS, was calculated.
8
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Assumptions and influencing factors
• MOCC data integrity, while improving, varies greatly between reporting years.
• MOCC data reflects multiple entries for individual GPETE items
• 197,866 GPETE line items reported by MOCC
• 95,882 GPETE line items reported by TEMIS (derived from SCLSIS)
• Hinging Fleet expenditures on model vice SCAT will identify the ‘bad actors’ in Navy inventory
• Ignoring platform application will provide the best averaged sample of actual equipment performance/reliability
• Inadequate reporting of repair part expenditures justifies excluding repair part costs from repair calculations.
9
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Mathematics• Calibration Costs
• Repair Costs
• BER Costs
(time) Cal Avg85$Interval Cal
12Inventory TEMIS
(time)Repair Average$140(%) Rate FailureInventory TEMIS
Price Model StandardAllowanceInventory TEMIS
Count BER
10
5 Year Procurement PlanThree key requirement areas:
1. Outfitting• Based on Deploying Battle Groups
2. Obsolete Equipment 3. Standardization
– In addition to engineering considerations we consider the following when performing standardization:- Models with short calibration intervals - Models with low inventory quantities - SCAT Code Consolidation
- RM&A
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
11
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
5 YEAR BUY PLAN CONTROL FIGURESFY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
DMM $1,250,000.00 $1,250,000.00 $1,250,000.00 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000OSCOPEs $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000MAINTENANCE $6,240,000 $4,070,000.00 $2,970,000.00 $3,350,000.00 $3,480,000.00 $3,610,000.00
$8,990,000 $6,820,000 $6,920,000 $7,050,000 $7,180,000 $7,310,000
GRAND TOTAL
12
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
This curve (shown below) indicates that the average maintenance costs for most test equipment begins to rise sharply at an economic age of 14.7 years. Within most GPETE functional groups, this is the point at which purchase of new equipment to replace obsolete inventory becomes fiscally imperative. Based on historical control numbers however, the current GPETE inventory of over 127,000 line items worth roughly $340M can only be completely replaced every 42.5 years.
Average Repairs per Annum
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Age of GPETE
Number of timesa GPETE modelis submitted forrepair per year
13
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAMFUNDING PROFILE
CONTROLS:
SPONSOR FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
N76 OPN 327 2,442 3,268 2,970 2,800 2,851 2,905 2,956
N77 OPN 1,109 1,085 1,305 1,338 1,302 1,330 1,3511,376
N78 OPN 1,791 1,752 4,268 2,086 2,075 2,112 2,1522,191
N096 OPN 443 480 573 536 553 563 574 585
N091 OPN 151 147 174 167 171 175 178 182
N43 OPN 1,594 1,552 1,650 1,693 1,740 1,772 1,806 1,840
N43 O&M,N 419 436 458 456 463 477 492 504
N6 OPN 817 795 991 930 1,241 1,266 1,286 1,311
SCN *524 *730 * * * * * *
* SCN ANNUAL FUNDING AMOUNT AND SOURCE DETERMINED BY SPECIFIC PLATFORMS IN THE SCN OUTFITTING PHASE
NOTE: THE ABOVE FUNDING PAYS FOR GPETE AND CALIBRATION STANDARDS EQUIPMENT AND PROGRAM LABOR COSTS
14
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
• FY($M) 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Tot
• Emergent Technology 0.7 0.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 4.8
• Standard/Modern 5.0 5.0 12.8 12.8 12.9 12.9 12.8 64.7
• Maintenance Initiatives 0.4 0.4 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 9.4
• Budget Totals for all Initiatives 16.4 16.4 16.4 14.8 14.6 79.1
Projected Budget Requests
15
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
FY($M) 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 TotStandardization Initiatives:Scope Cost Avoidance 5.4 5.7 6.1 6.3 6.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 35.4DMM Cost Avoidance 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 22.9BGen Cost Avoidance 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 21.7SGen Cost Avoidance 9.8 9.9 10.4 10.9 11.3 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 63.5Freq Ctr/Mtr Avoidance 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 15.7
Maintenance Initiatives:Antenna Tester 0.05 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.6Synchro Indicator 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.5Phase Angle Voltmeter 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 6.1Comm. Analyzer 0.26 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 14.6
Costs Savings Totals 24.6 28.3 30.0 31.4 32.5 11.9 9.0 9.1 9.1 185.9
Projected Cost Avoidance by test equipment family
16
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Standardization Initiative To implement Fleet wide GPETE modernization by
using standardization within families of test equipment that perform similar basic functions.
Procurements over time has resulted in a variety of models that perform similar functions. This has created a huge footprint for logistics support. We have broken down our approximate 900 individual equipment types into functional groups. This provides opportunity to consolidate models as well as defined SCAT codes relative to maintenance. The analysis has been completed for the first two groups, oscilloscopes and digital multimeters.
17
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Standardization Construct• Process Organization
• 77 Measurement Discipline (functional) Groups• Lifecycle Management Plan for Each Group• Long Term Budget Plan
• Technical Evaluation• FY02/03 - Scopes & Meters • Scopes - (12 SCATs to 3, 71 Models to 6)• DMMs - (38 SCATs to 15, 241 Models to 35)
• FY04 - work planned • Function and Signal Generators, Frequency Counters, &
Megohmmeters
18
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Class Standard Allowancing InitiativeThis effort incorporates a methodology by which test equipment requirements across particular ship class or like operational shore activities are optimized to incorporate cost-of-ownership concepts by overall inventory standardization. This process provides an efficient and effective means for inventory control, equipment modernization and configuration management
19
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAMclass allowancing sample – partial MCM construct
SCAT CODE
S/C QTY QTY QTY QTY QTY QTY QTY QTY QTY
4007 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4032 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0
4042 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0
4046 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4068 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4069 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4076 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4114 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0
4115 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
4117 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4173 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
4200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4205 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4206 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
4208 0 4209 0 4209 0 4209 0 4209 0 4209 0 4209 0 4209 0 4209 0
4209 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4212 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
4214 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0
4228 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4236 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
4237 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4242 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4245 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
4261 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0 RLP 0
MCM 9MCM 5 MCM 6 MCM 7 MCM 8MCM 1 MCM 2 MCM 3 MCM 4
20
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
Calibration Standards Modernization– To define and standardize the NAVSEA
process for determining laboratory standards allowances and the associated procurement policy
• Establishes the roles and responsibilities assigned by NAVSEA to support TMDE calibration functions.
• Re-initiates Laboratory Allowance Reviews• Performs Production workload analysis • Identifies candidates for modernization
21
NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM
• Major/Management Issues– Lack of OM & N Funding adversely impacts on
available labor to perform engineering functions
– Lack of OPN Funding adversely impacts on program’s ability to match execution to Fleet requirements