Navalized Starfighter
-
Upload
piotr-t-szymanski -
Category
Documents
-
view
246 -
download
2
Transcript of Navalized Starfighter
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
1/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
2/50
Lockheed L-242 Navalized Starfighter
The L-242 airplane was the result of two concurrent studies which were being pursued prior
to Lockheeds final submission to the OS-130 competition. The first such study was based on
the original requirements for a Navy fighter outlined in the first issue of OS-130. The second
study was for a day fighter airplane based on requirements for the United States Air Force
(which ultimately yielded the legendary F-104). In subsequent changes to OS-130, it became
apparent that Navy requirements were paralleling the concept of a day fighter being
developed for the Air Force and, as a result, Lockheeds proposal was essentially the airplanedeveloped for the Air Force modified to fulfill the requirements of a carrier-based airplane for
Navy use.
The table is a supplemental summary of the airplane characteristics and performance which
describes more clearly the combat capabilities and compares the airplane performance directly
with the final requirements of OS-130 and its Amendments.
Lockheed claimed that the L-242 would be entirely adequate to fulfill Navy requirements. It
had a top possible combat speed of 1,000 kts, corresponding to a Mach number of 1.74, which
was far in excess of the Mach 1.2 required. In addition, it had a combat radius of 495 miles,
by the use of droppable fuel tanks and combat at Mach 1.2, which exceeded the 400 miles
required.
Since this airplane was identical in general design to the F-104, its internal fuel capacity was
not q ite s fficient to f lfill the radi s specified in OS 130 Th s the 188 mile radi s ith a
http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=656http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=656 -
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
3/50
Introduction
In the development of the Lockheed L-242 design, the initial effort was spent on an airplaneto fulfill the requirements of a non-afterburning fighter which had a combat radius of 300
miles and a high speed of Mach 1. The development of this design was pursued with a
substantial effort until November 25, 1952 in spite of the fact that previous fighter
investigations by Lockheed had indicated that this level of performance was quite low and
that, on the basis of contemporary power plant data, a lighter smaller, airplane could be
achieved using an afterburner type of power plant. These design studies were continued,
however, because Lockheed was acutely aware of the Navys earnest effort to reduce the size,weight and complexity of its fighter aircraft.
The final design for the non-afterburning fighter did not include a main gear because of the
potential saving in weight provided by the mat landing system.
It was gratifying, in the comparison of the airplanes, to see that the supersonic design was not
vastly larger, and was only more complicated by the inclusion of the afterburner. It was the
considered opinion of Lockheed that the final requirements were more realistic and haveresulted in a more useful airplane for the Navy.
The following sections summarize the operational characteristics of the airplane, including
details of combat performance on alternate missions, combat armament, carrier suitability and
adaptability to later designs of carrier landing facilities. In addition, its maintenance features
and emergency escape provisions are outlined. Another section is devoted to the development
b k d f thi ti l de i ith di i h the i de i det il e e
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
4/50
Also apparent on the inboard profile was the fuselage stowage of the main gear, which
permitted the 3.4% thickness of the wing. In this location, the gear did not interfere with the
external wing stores nor did it prohibit the installation of external stores on the fuselage.
Finally, as shown in both Figures A and B, the ducts and the speed brakes had both been
placed on the side of the fuselage so that eventual modification of the airplane for mat landing
purposes would not involve any change in the aerodynamic configuration.
The general arrangement emphasized the simplicity of the airplane concept which was
necessary to obtain a really useable military weapon and to decrease the development,manufacturing and operational costs of the weapon system.
Combat Performance
Since the definition of a combat profile was difficult and the definition of the combat portion
of a mission could be interpreted in many ways, Lockheed created a summary of alternate
combat profiles to illustrate the full utility of the L-242. Several alternate combat profiles are
shown which were based on different missions where equipment was changed, or the missionpurpose was changed, from that of air-to-air fighter. Included in these alternate missions were
photo missions, bombardment operations, and trainer uses, all of which were found to be
easily provided by simple adaptation of the basic design.
Since the operation of a supersonic airplane had lead to many conjectures concerning the
limits of the airplane and its utility in combat maneuvers, considerable emphasis was place on
th bilit f th i l t l t idl t b t d d it bilit t
http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=773http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=774http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=774http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=773http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=774 -
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
5/50
Combat Armament
The basic Mark 16 sight installation, coupled with AN/APG-34 range radar, was believed tobe the simplest effective installation which could have been incorporated in the first models of
the L-242. Since the components of this sight and system were essentially developed, and
since training procedures were in existence which would develop pilots for this system, it was
felt that its installation in first-production models of the airplane was certainly justified. With
all of the armament components which were proposed for this system, with the exception of
the Aerowolf missile, it was believed to be the simplest possible sight arrangement.
The accompanying blueprints summarize the armament investigations which were made on
the airplane and showed the following capabilities.
1. Gun InstallationsAs shown in Figure 9, the basic Mark 12 guns were feasible to
install in the airplane with 500 rounds of ammunition as required. Alternatively, two
T-182 cannon could have been installed with 500 rounds of ammunition, or a single T-
171 cannon could have also been included with 500 rounds of ammunition. Lockheed
believed that the use of the T-171 cannon was worthy of substantial consideration,since it had the capability of firing almost as many rounds per second as the four Mark
12 guns, and its installation utilized only one armament compartment on the airplane,
leaving the other armament compartment available for the installation of additional
equipment or rockets. A comparison of the total armament weight for the several guns
indicated that for a given amount of fire power there was little to choose between the
installations from a weight standpoint.
2. Rocket InstallationsLockheed only presented one type of rocket installation,
http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=685http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=685 -
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
6/50
for the ability to put rockets in tandem. In any case, the sight had to be arranged for
either open or closed tubes, and, therefore, it would have been undesirable to combine
the fuselage rocket with tip rocket pods, since the ballistics of the two would havebeen different. Lockheed believed that the most desirable installation could have been
a combination of fuselage guns and tip rockets; or a combination of fuselage guns and
nose rockets. A final alternate would have been the use of a T-145 gun on one side
with rockets on the opposite side in the armament compartment. This was the lightest
combination of rockets and guns, and could have proven the simplest.
3. Missile InstallationsFigure 12 shows the installation of four Sparrow missiles and
four Aerowolf missiles on the airplane mounted on external racks on the wing. The
mid-wing arrangement made these installations relatively simple with no ground
clearance problem and the straight wing permitted their installation with the least
effect on balance. Lockheed gave special consideration to the airplane with the
Aerowolf, since this missile promised the simplest possible sighting arrangement,
eliminating range determination by the sight and eliminating the necessity of lead
computation. Lockheed believed usage of the Aerowolf missile as sole armament
merited special consideration for versions of the airplane which were to do interceptor
duty only. This would have permitted additional fuel in the fuselage, resulting inincreased radius or combat time.
4. External Bomb StoresSince the development of a fighter store was far from firm,
Figure 13 was compiled to show several alternative arrangements of external stores on
the airplane. It was worthy of note that the mid-wing arrangement of the airplane and
the landing gear installation had placed substantial emphasis on the ability of the
airplane to carry external stores with good ground and landing gear clearance. As
shown on Figure 13, the 1,000 lb Douglas store was easily carried, and a store of
bl h ith di t f 14 d f ldi fi ld h b i d t
http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=669http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=670http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=669http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=670 -
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
7/50
was used to supply target range information to the Mark 16 optical computing sight
from which gunfire was directed. A receiver-transmitter modulator, antenna, indicator
synchronizer, and control box were included in the proposed radar. The following is abrief itemized operational description of the system: a) ControlsOperation was
instigated by the pilot who had one primary control, an ON-OFF switch. Focus,
brilliance and receiver gain controls were added so that the picture could be adjusted
for optimum viewing. These latter controls could be set on the ground during pre-
flight checks. b) Antenna Scan CoverageThe search antenna, a paraboloid
approximately 22 in diameter, mounted in the aircrafts nose section, revolved at a
high rate of scan in a circular pattern about the airplanes centerline covering a conical
area of plus/minus 60 from this same center line. This coverage was accomplished by
mechanical movement of the antenna as it spun in either a spiral or nodding
manner. c)Indicator PresentationThe cathode ray tube indicator picture which was
used by the pilot for search and tracking purposes was a vertical type PPI display
which revolved in synch with the antennas rotation. In other words, the fighter
airplane was at the center of the scope and the sweep gave range and approximate
elevation and azimuth position information of the target. This is further illustrated in
Figure 14. Roman numeral I of Figure 14 shows how this presentation would haveappeared, based on a sweep range of 25 nm. The earths radar return would have
essentially formed an artificial horizon at the bottom of the scope and further given the
pilot his approximate altitude and attitude above the earths surface. Reference marks
showing range, as well as horizontal and vertical reference lines were etched on the
face of the cathode ray tube. Targets that appeared above the horizontal line were
those targets above the fighter and those which appeared to the right of the vertical
etched line were to the right of the airplane and those that appeared on the left of this
li t it l ft Th if t t d t t d h i R l II it
http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=693http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=693 -
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
8/50
installation as well as for service. The electronic equipment was designed as a package
unit to facilitate installation, maintenance, and service.
7. Economy of Tooling and Floor SpaceSimplified tension type joints used throughoutthe fuselage, and for joining the wings, kept master gauge costs to a minimum and
eliminated the need for any mating jigs. Each major section of the airplane was
designed to be assembled complete as a subassembly prior to mating. For example, the
forward fuselage, Station 122 to 378.5, could have been assembled complete,
including the canopy, nose landing gear, all doors and panels, etc. prior to mating to
the mid-fuselage. All doors, panels, etc. fell within the confines of each major
subassembly. This feature eliminated the need for portable apply-type drill fixtures
and any drilling or fitting operations after mating that was normally required for
members straddling joint planes. The final assembly line for the L-242 would have
been comparatively short since the operation would have consisted primarily of
mating the major sections, with installation work kept to a minimum.
8. Sub-Contracting the ExpensibilityEach component section of the L-242 was a
complete unit within itself, and was particularly adaptable for subcontracting. All units
were small enough to handle and ship with ease. All problems of tool coordination
were confined to a single section since all movable or removable members werecontained in the subsection. Single plane tension joints, and their related simplified
tooling, assured proper fits and mating of the various sections of the ship. The units of
the production breakdown were extended sufficiently to permit proper work
distribution for expanded production programs. Only the duplication of tools and
facilities required application to attain efficient mobilization rates. The manufacturing
methods and techniques used in the production of the L-242 were standard methods of
manufacture and were all used on contemporary Lockheed production aircraft.
9 F d F l St ti 122 t 378 5 Th f d f l d f
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
9/50
bulkheads. This unit was assembled by framing the longerons to the bulkheads and the
joint ring at Station 508, and attaching the panel assemblies at the longerons. The tail
cone joint, at Station 618, was a simple tension type joint accessible from inside thefuselage. This section, along with the empennage, tail cone, and dive flaps, constituted
the service removable aft section, for engine access and exchange.
12. WingThe wing, which featured single unit skins and a series of spanwise beams,
attached to the side of the fuselage with a simple flat plane tension joint. Twenty-one
attaching bolts were accessible from inside the fuselage. The breakdown of the wing is
shown in Figure 27. All movable surfaces were to have been installed on the wing,
along with their respective actuator units, and rigged and checked out prior to being
mated to the fuselage. All control mechanisms for actuating the leading edge and
trailing edge flaps were located outside the primary wing box structure, thus
eliminating removable access panels in the box structure. Access was gained by
disconnecting the flap links and allowing the surface to hinge downward
approximately 90. The well, which housed the spoiler in the wing surface, was
designed to be sub-assembled complete with spoiler, cylinders, piping, etc., prior to
being installed in the wing structure.
13.EmpennageThe empennage was attached to the aft fuselage by four shear bolts atthe vertical fin beams. Access to this joint was gained through removable fillet
sections. The empennage contained the pitch control booster mechanism and was
capable of being completely rigged prior to mating to the fuselage. a) Vertical Fin
The vertical fin was composed of a leading edge assembly, a trailing edge assembly, a
tip, and intermediate ribs and skins. The two spars, which were aluminum forgings,
had integral fuselage attaching lugs and the rear spar could have had an integral
trunnion bearing for the stabilizer. This unit was assembled by positioning the leading
d d t ili d d f i i th i t di t ib d ki Th dd
http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=765http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=765http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=765 -
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
10/50
it was entirely feasible to modify the airplane for use with an unconventional mat landing
system with attendant gains in combat time or radius.
Although the basic design had been limited to a fighter task, and even though a concentrated
effort had been spent reducing the size, complexity and weight of the airplane, Lockheed
believed the design was usable for several alternate missions including photo reconnaissance,
training and bombardment missions, even including the carrying of special stores. In spite of
the high speed potential, pilot emergency escape was entirely feasible with simple foolproof
mechanisms, thus aiding substantially in maintaining pilot morale. Combining a high speed
potential of Mach 1.74 (1,000 kts) with a combat altitude of 50,000 ft and combat radii
varying from 188 miles to 495 miles, depending upon fuel carried and type of mission, the L-
242 had the potential of performance to give air superiority or equality over any land-based
fighter that could have been developed in the equivalent time period. Furthermore, it had the
potential with contemporary programmed power plants of even higher performance and
greater range and these power plants could have been installed with very minor changes to the
basic airframe. Since the basic L-242 airplane was under development for use on a similar
mission by the Air Force, its concurrent development for Navy purposes was a logical
program. It provided both services with a maximum striking force for minimum developmentand production costs. Since the requirements as outlined by The Air Force and by the Navy
were roughly equivalent, it appeared uneconomical to develop two airplanes for such similar
missions.
Carrier Suitability
Figure 3 at the beginning of this article covered the performance of the airplane in and around
th i b t did t h i th h i l it bilit d th t f th
http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=648http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=648 -
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
11/50
to put the landing gear in such a position that the space made available by the removal of the
gear could have been utilized for alternate purposes.
Figure 17 is a diagram of the airplane inboard profile in which the landing gear has been
removed providing additional space and saving weight. It appeared that approximately 100
gals of fuel could have been put in this area, thereby extending the radius to the desired 300
miles. Lockheed suggested that when such a version of the airplane was considered the nose
gear be retained so that the cart for maneuvering the airplane on the carrier decks would only
have to be of the two-wheel variety once the nose gear had been extended. This could have
been of substantial assistance for take-off purposes and may have simplified the carrier
procedure. Furthermore, it would have permitted an external gear to be mounted on the wing,
thus facilitating the use of the airplane for training and ferrying purposes where the mat
landing facilities were not available.
Emergency Provisions
Figure 18 illustrates the provisions which were made for emergency egress from the airplane.
Considerable effort was spent analyzing the various means of exit from a high-speed airplaneincluding capsule exit, nose detachment, upward and downward ejection, including the actual
detail design of several of these alternates. After substantial consideration of this problem, it
was concluded that the simplest and, therefore, the most feasible method of high-speed exit,
resulted from a combination of complete airplane deceleration and downward ejection.
Experiments at the Lockheed Corporation under the development of the MX-883 supersonic
ram jet test vehicle had shown that the deceleration by parachute of large-weight vehicles was
ti l f ibl d ti l d th f h ld h b i l id d b
http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=701http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=736http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=701http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=736 -
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
12/50
fashion. A further advantage of the configuration was that no wing folding mechanism was
necessary because of the short span, thereby eliminating one major item from maintenance
consideration.
Figure 20 is a diagram showing the access doors which were provided for servicing the
various components of equipment installed in the airplane. Unusual in this regard was the fact
that the electronic equipment was concentrated in two easily accessible locations with large
doors, and the wheel well doors within the fuselage provide additional access to portions of
the fuel system and hydraulic system of the airplane. Removing the tail for engine access was
a completely accepted maintenance feature with many advantages as pioneered in the F-80
series airplanes. A three-point attachment of the aft fuselage simplified its removal, and rails
were provided in the engine installation to permit the movement of the engine aft out of the
fuselage to such a position that the hoist attachment could have been made directly without
any special rigging. The engine was removed as an entity, including its afterburner. Of further
interest to maintenance was the fact that single-point refueling was incorporated in the design
which permitted rapid and simple refueling procedures, cutting down turn-around time.
Development Background for Design
Since a number of reasons for the airplane configuration were already outlined in the
discussion of the operational characteristics of the design, it is only necessary to make a brief
recapitulation of these reasons. There was a wealth of development background which
included the following major items of interest.
Wing Selection
http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=737http://retromechanix.com/articles/aerospace/lockheed-l-242-navalized-star-fighter/?pid=737 -
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
13/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
14/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
15/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
16/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
17/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
18/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
19/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
20/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
21/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
22/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
23/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
24/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
25/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
26/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
27/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
28/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
29/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
30/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
31/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
32/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
33/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
34/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
35/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
36/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
37/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
38/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
39/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
40/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
41/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
42/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
43/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
44/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
45/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
46/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
47/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
48/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
49/50
-
7/27/2019 Navalized Starfighter
50/50