Naval Air Station Fallon

Nevada Joint Military Affairs Committee Update

Naval Air Station Fallon

Nevada Joint Military Affairs Committee Update

CAPT Leif SteinbaughCommanding OfficerFebruary 10, 2015

CAPT Leif SteinbaughCommanding OfficerFebruary 10, 2015

Air Station DemographicsAir Station Demographics

2

• Primary Tenants: Total 21

• Top 5 Primary Tenants (by size)

1. Naval Strike and Air Warfare Center (256 Mil/43 Civ)

2. Strike Fighter Wing Pacific Det Fallon (101 Mil/0 Civ)

3. Fleet Readiness Center West Det Fallon (69 Mil/18 Civ)

4. Fleet Composite Squadron THIRTEEN (52 Mil/98 Civ)

5. Naval Munitions Command, CONUS West Division,

Det Fallon (54 Mil/ 9 Civ)

• Mil/ CIV/ NAF: 207/91/343

• Funding APF : ($8.0M-Labor / $23.8M-N-Labor)

• Funding NAF: ($4.7M-Labor / $4.8M-N-Labor)

• Reimbursable Funding: ($78.6K-L/$447K-NL)

• Types of Appn: OMN, FHN, FAP, TAMP, RAP

• PRV: $1,410,875,385

• Area: 240,726.72 acres (in fee and withdrawn)

• Facilities Structures (Non-Housing): 325

• Housing Structures:

•PPV/Non-PPV: 230/25 (1,780 trans/164 perm)

• Runways: 3

• Range Airspace: 6.5 million acres

• CO/XO/CMC report / departure dates:

• CO—CAPT Steinbaugh: 14 Jun 13 / Jun 16• XO—CDR Woodruff: 17 Aug 12 / Aug 15• CMC— CMC Anderson: 25 Mar 13 / Mar 16

• CSD total customer base population: ~2550

NAS Fallon Training Airspace

RenoMOA

Fallon RangeTraining Complex

Military Airspace Including Military Training Routes

3

Joint Land Use StudyJoint Land Use Study

� Study petitioned by Churchill County in 2012

– Goal – maintain compatible land use between military operations and public in maximizing utilization by stakeholders

� Stakeholders have identified 76 issues / concerns

� The Final Draft document is currently being completed

� Next phase of the JLUS is implementing the recommendations from the study with input from all of the participants

� Study petitioned by Churchill County in 2012

– Goal – maintain compatible land use between military operations and public in maximizing utilization by stakeholders

� Stakeholders have identified 76 issues / concerns

� The Final Draft document is currently being completed

� Next phase of the JLUS is implementing the recommendations from the study with input from all of the participants

4

Navy HousingNavy Housing

MILCON ConstructionMILCON Construction

MILCON Construction NASF

� P-430 Alteration for the F-35 Training Mission

� P-420 Integrated Air Wing Training Facility

� P-418 Tactical Ground Mobility Training (SEALs)

MILCON Construction NASF

� P-430 Alteration for the F-35 Training Mission

� P-420 Integrated Air Wing Training Facility

� P-418 Tactical Ground Mobility Training (SEALs)

P-430 Hangar 1 Upgrade for F-35 Training Mission

P-430 Hangar 1 Upgrade for F-35 Training Mission

P-420 Integrated Air Wing Training Facility

P-420 Integrated Air Wing Training Facility

P-418 Tactical Ground Mobility Training FacilityP-418 Tactical Ground Mobility Training Facility

Special Project RepairSpecial Project Repair

Special Project Repair NASF

�Repair Lighting and Pavements Runway 7-25

�Repair Lighting Outboard Runway 13/31R

�Repair Fire Main to Airfield

Special Project Repair NASF

�Repair Lighting and Pavements Runway 7-25

�Repair Lighting Outboard Runway 13/31R

�Repair Fire Main to Airfield

B-16 Environmental Assessment

B-16 Environmental Assessment

FONSI Signed RADM Patrick Lorge on 29 September 2014The Bravo-16 Environmental Assessment analyzed providing additional training activities and range activities within Training Range Bravo-16 (B-16), used by Naval Special Warfare Command.

� Closing two areas of Navy withdrawn land to public access and installing a fence to increase the safety of military personnel and the public and provide a buffer zone around these areas;

� Establishing a free maneuver area in the Southwest and Northwest areas of the Range for vehicle training;

� Developing a landing zone for C-130 aircraft;

� Develop a launch and recovery area for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS);

� Install visual cueing items, including relocatable habitat units, for more realistic training;

� Re-routing the primary access road to Training Range Bravo-16(B-16) off Sand Canyon Road along the north-south run-in line;

� Installation of a new range tower; and,

� Installation rail-mounted moving targets.

FONSI Signed RADM Patrick Lorge on 29 September 2014The Bravo-16 Environmental Assessment analyzed providing additional training activities and range activities within Training Range Bravo-16 (B-16), used by Naval Special Warfare Command.

� Closing two areas of Navy withdrawn land to public access and installing a fence to increase the safety of military personnel and the public and provide a buffer zone around these areas;

� Establishing a free maneuver area in the Southwest and Northwest areas of the Range for vehicle training;

� Developing a landing zone for C-130 aircraft;

� Develop a launch and recovery area for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS);

� Install visual cueing items, including relocatable habitat units, for more realistic training;

� Re-routing the primary access road to Training Range Bravo-16(B-16) off Sand Canyon Road along the north-south run-in line;

� Installation of a new range tower; and,

� Installation rail-mounted moving targets.

Fallon Range Training Complex EIS

Fallon Range Training Complex EIS

� Public Comment Period

The Draft EIS is available for public comment

from Jan. 23, 2015, to March 9, 2015

�Draft EIS is available for review at www.FRTCEIS.com

� Public Review Meeting

Thursday, Feb. 19, 2015, 5 to 7 p.m.Churchill County Commission Chambers

155 N. Taylor St., Fallon, NV 89406

� Public Comment Period

The Draft EIS is available for public comment

from Jan. 23, 2015, to March 9, 2015

�Draft EIS is available for review at www.FRTCEIS.com

� Public Review Meeting

Thursday, Feb. 19, 2015, 5 to 7 p.m.Churchill County Commission Chambers

155 N. Taylor St., Fallon, NV 89406

Nevada’s Carrier in the Desert

QUESTIONS?