Natural history of Ross Sea emperor penguin colonies · PDF fileNatural history of Ross Sea...

2
35 A j. 70 Figure 1. Relationship between time of day and depth and fre- quency of diving for Adélie penguins foraging near Palmer Station, Antarctica. The two horizontal axes represent time of day (in 1- hour intervals) and maximum dive depth (in 1-meter intervals), respectively. The vertical axis is the frequency of occurrence of each combination of time and depth. The figure excludes data from traveling dives (see text) and from all dives with maximum depths less than 5 meters. N =5,900 dives by 27 penguins. lies spent most of their time submerged; typical foraging bouts lasted 20-60 minutes and included 10-40 dives. Travel time between colonies and foraging sites varied widely. Some birds traveled for 2-3 hours before commencing foraging dives, but many others began foraging activities within 10-15 minutes of departure. This research was largely supported by National Science Foundation grant DPP 89-17066. We are grateful to the Palmer Station staff and to members of other research teams for their invaluable assistance at various stages of our work. Figure 2. Relationship between dive duration and maximum depth for Adélie penguins during foraging near Palmer Station, Antarc- tica. The two horizontal axes represent maximum dive duration (in 10-second intervals) and maximum dive depth (in 1-meter inter- vals), respectively. The vertical axis is the frequency of occurrence of each combination of dive duration and maximum depth. The figure excludes data from traveling dives (see text) and from all dives with maximum depths less than 5 meters. N = 5,900 dives by 27 penguins. References Ainley, D.C., R.E. LeResche, and W.J.L. Sladen. 1983. Breeding biology of the Adëlie penguin. Berkeley: University of California Press. Chappell, M.A., K.R. Morgan, S.L. Souza, and T.L. Bucher. 1989. Convection and thermoregulation in two Antarctic seabirds. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 159B, 313-322. Chappell, M.A., K.R. Morgan, and T.L. Bucher. 1990. Weather, micro- climate, and energy costs of thermoregulation for breeding Adélie penguins. Oecologia, 83, 420-426. Trivelpiece, W.Z., S.C. Trivelpiece, and N.J. Volkman. 1987 Ecological segregation of Adélie, gentoo, and chinstrap penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. Ecology, 68, 351-361. Natural history of Ross Sea emperor penguin colonies GERALD L. KOOYMAN, PAUL J . PONGANIS, and PHILIP H. THORSON Physiological Research Laboratory Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093 PATRICE ROBISSON Centre d'Etudes Biologiques des Animaux Savage Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Beauvoir-sur-Niort, France In this third season (1986, 1989) of the study of emperor penguin colonies in the Ross Sea, we introduced several new procedures, all of which were highly successful. The first was deployment of the field camp at Cape Washington by twin- otter. This precluded the need for an air drop or long traverse, and the camp was established by 15 October, the earliest siting of the camp yet. This early arrival was possible because of the first-ever transport of the twin-otter to the Antarctic within an Air Force C5 from Port Hueneme, California to McMurdo Sound with a stopover in Christchurch, New Zealand. It was also an exceptionally early beginning for U.S. Navy helicopter operations when three of the team were transported to Cape Crozier on 11 October for an early season census of the emperor penguin colony. The colony has grown signifi- cantly in the last few years and now numbers about 300 chicks. A count later in the season on 18 December, just before fledg- ing, indicated that chick mortality had been low since October. For the first time in a single season, the other five colonies 1991 REVIEW 181

Transcript of Natural history of Ross Sea emperor penguin colonies · PDF fileNatural history of Ross Sea...

35

A

j.

70

Figure 1. Relationship between time of day and depth and fre-quency of diving for Adélie penguins foraging near Palmer Station,Antarctica. The two horizontal axes represent time of day (in 1-hour intervals) and maximum dive depth (in 1-meter intervals),respectively. The vertical axis is the frequency of occurrence ofeach combination of time and depth. The figure excludes data fromtraveling dives (see text) and from all dives with maximum depthsless than 5 meters. N =5,900 dives by 27 penguins.

lies spent most of their time submerged; typical foraging boutslasted 20-60 minutes and included 10-40 dives. Travel timebetween colonies and foraging sites varied widely. Some birdstraveled for 2-3 hours before commencing foraging dives, butmany others began foraging activities within 10-15 minutes ofdeparture.

This research was largely supported by National ScienceFoundation grant DPP 89-17066. We are grateful to the PalmerStation staff and to members of other research teams for theirinvaluable assistance at various stages of our work.

Figure 2. Relationship between dive duration and maximum depthfor Adélie penguins during foraging near Palmer Station, Antarc-tica. The two horizontal axes represent maximum dive duration (in10-second intervals) and maximum dive depth (in 1-meter inter-vals), respectively. The vertical axis is the frequency of occurrenceof each combination of dive duration and maximum depth. Thefigure excludes data from traveling dives (see text) and from alldives with maximum depths less than 5 meters. N = 5,900 dives by27 penguins.

References

Ainley, D.C., R.E. LeResche, and W.J.L. Sladen. 1983. Breeding biologyof the Adëlie penguin. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Chappell, M.A., K.R. Morgan, S.L. Souza, and T.L. Bucher. 1989.Convection and thermoregulation in two Antarctic seabirds. Journalof Comparative Physiology, 159B, 313-322.

Chappell, M.A., K.R. Morgan, and T.L. Bucher. 1990. Weather, micro-climate, and energy costs of thermoregulation for breeding Adéliepenguins. Oecologia, 83, 420-426.

Trivelpiece, W.Z., S.C. Trivelpiece, and N.J. Volkman. 1987 Ecologicalsegregation of Adélie, gentoo, and chinstrap penguins at KingGeorge Island, Antarctica. Ecology, 68, 351-361.

Natural history of Ross Seaemperor penguin colonies

GERALD L. KOOYMAN, PAUL J . PONGANIS,and PHILIP H. THORSON

Physiological Research LaboratoryScripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San Diego

La Jolla, California 92093

PATRICE ROBISSON

Centre d'Etudes Biologiques des Animaux SavageCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Beauvoir-sur-Niort, France

In this third season (1986, 1989) of the study of emperorpenguin colonies in the Ross Sea, we introduced several newprocedures, all of which were highly successful. The first wasdeployment of the field camp at Cape Washington by twin-otter. This precluded the need for an air drop or long traverse,and the camp was established by 15 October, the earliest sitingof the camp yet. This early arrival was possible because of thefirst-ever transport of the twin-otter to the Antarctic withinan Air Force C5 from Port Hueneme, California to McMurdoSound with a stopover in Christchurch, New Zealand.

It was also an exceptionally early beginning for U.S. Navyhelicopter operations when three of the team were transportedto Cape Crozier on 11 October for an early season census ofthe emperor penguin colony. The colony has grown signifi-cantly in the last few years and now numbers about 300 chicks.A count later in the season on 18 December, just before fledg-ing, indicated that chick mortality had been low since October.

For the first time in a single season, the other five colonies

1991 REVIEW 181

Figure 1. The seal exclusion cage partially underwater at the ob-servation site. When fully in place, the top of the seal exclusioncage is flush with the sea ice.

were either visited or surveyed during a close aerial pass. Ateach colony, we took a census, and we analyzed colony struc-ture, distribution of the colony on the sea ice, and sea-ice con-ditions. Coulman Island is, without question, the largest colonyin terms of both the number of birds and the area it occupies.Total counts and ice conditions are under analysis.

The central study site was Cape Washington. We conductedthree major studies there, two of which were new to penguinstudies. The new studies were underwater observations of em-peror penguin predator-avoidance strategies and satellite track-ing of the birds. The latter was in collaboration with Frenchscientists conducting nearly simultaneous tracking experimentsat Dumont d'Urville. The analysis of the tracking studies arein progress, and it appears that the penguins may routinelytravel 200 kilometers from the colonies during their approxi-mately 10-day foraging trips.

The predator avoidance studies were done at the ice edgeabout 3 kilometers from the colony. An innovation was theemployment of a seal exclusion cage (figure 1). The cage kept

Figure 2. A view from the seal exclusion cage of birds acceleratingtoward the exit hole. Note the turbulence rings on the breast feath-ers of the two upright birds, and the jet-like stream of bubblesemanating from the middle bird.

the observers from being distracted or intimidated by patrollingleopard seals and enabled us to make concentrated observa-tions of the birds. Conditions were ideal: water visibility wasslightly more than 70 meters, and several hundred penguinsper hour were passing by for close observation. The results ofseveral hours of videotape are being analyzed for behavioralresponses and speed estimates of the birds (figure 2).

Finally, 15 to 20 good dive records were obtained for deter-mining the foraging characteristics of the birds. These recordsconsist of about 25,000 total dives. The results show that thebirds range widely throughout the water column from about 50meters to 500 meters depth.

We are especially grateful to Dave Bresnahan whose re-sourcefulness made possible the twin-otter air support. We arealso grateful for the support of the Italian antarctic programand Helicopters New Zealand for logistic and air support atCape Washington, Coulman Island, Cape Roget, and for ourtimely return to McMurdo Station. Steve Kottmeier, Jill Verey-ken, and their staff went the extra mile to ensure success andcomfort of our program. This work was supported by NationalScience Foundation grant DPP 87-15863.

182 ANTARCTIC JOURNAL