Natural Colors: Opportunities for Innovation · 6/3/2019  · Manufacturers is to advance the...

41
Natural Colors: Opportunities for Innovation International Association of Color Manufacturers

Transcript of Natural Colors: Opportunities for Innovation · 6/3/2019  · Manufacturers is to advance the...

  • Natural Colors: Opportunities for Innovation

    International Association of Color Manufacturers

  • Your Presenters

    ▪ John H. Cox, IACM

    ▪ Diego Darquea C., California Natural Color

    ▪ Deepti Dabas, Kalsec, Inc.

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED2

  • IACM Mission Statement“The mission of the International Association of Color Manufacturers is to advance the interests of manufacturers, producers, and users in the color industry by demonstrating the safety of colors and promoting the industry’s economic growth.”

  • Current Members

  • Member Benefits

    ▪ Observer NGO status at Codex Alimentarius and active participation in the Codex Committee on Food Additives (CCFA) meetings and working groups.

    ▪ Member center on the IACM web site including members only regulatory resources, color monographs and database

    ▪ Strong relationships with key federal and international agencies, in particular FDA, USDA FAS, EFSA, and JECFA, who look to our staff as key scientific and regulatory experts for the international color industry

    ▪ Education and networking opportunities including quarterly members meetings, biennial Global Color Conference, educational webinars, LinkedIn Group, and the annual membership directory

    IACM Industry Leadership

  • The committee’s objectives include:

    • The protection and expansion of the current approvals for natural color additives in the US, Asia, Europe, and elsewhere;

    • Participation in the development of official and unofficial analytical methods for natural color additives; and

    • The creation and maintenance of public information and awareness of all aspects of natural color additives.

    Committee Leadership

    • Chair: Kate Urbain, Chr Hansen

    • Vice-Chair: Melissa Kessler, Mars, Inc.

  • © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED7

    “Natural” Color Reality Today

    ▪ Consumers Have Indicated a Preference for Natural

    ▪ Regulations are Incomplete and Inconsistent

    ▪ Approval Process for New Colors is Challenging

    ▪ Global Regulations Are Not Harmonized

  • CONSUMER DEMAND FOR NATURAL

    COLORS FACE GLOBAL REGULATORY

    CHALLENGES

    Diego Darquea C.

    California Natural Color – Fresno, CA

  • © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED9

    • Affordability• Legality

    • Feasibility• Desire

    CONSUMER NEED

    TECHNOLOGY

    BUSINESSREGULATION

  • The Challenge

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED10

  • Consumers want it, companies strive to deliver it, but

    regulators say “wait a minute”

    ▪ What is “it”

    ▪ Same taste, look, performance of any product - anywhere, everywhere

    • Regulatory standards are inconsistent

    • Quality requirements are constraining

    • Production capabilities are unpredictable

    • Consumer needs are erratic

    • Political stability is oxymoronic

    ▪ So, what can we do for consumers?

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED11

  • THE COLOR ADDITIVE CONVERSATION IS

    MORE LIKE A YELLING MATCH

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED12

  • Global consumers eat with their eyes but learn via social

    media

    ▪ “Shareable” foods require visual engagement and innovation.

    ▪ Exciting colors, including mythical-inspired unicorn and mermaid

    colors, add an element of fun to products and appeal to consumers

    looking to share their experiences in visual ways.

    ▪ “Natural” claims are on the rise – but everyone interprets this differently

    ▪ Inconsistencies on “natural” regulations make it challenging for

    companies to satisfy consumer needs

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED13 SOURCE: Mintel’s 2016 Food and Drink Trend Eat with Your Eyes

  • Using colorful language is required to improve education

    and awareness

    ▪ Nutritionists and dieticians encourage us to consume a diet based on

    a rainbow of foods - each of the colors represents a different nutrient

    or compound that work with your body to keep it healthy.

    ▪ “Healthy” and “natural” halo effect

    • Ingredient approval process

    • Allowable claims

    • Labeling requirements

    • Banning or disclaiming

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED14

  • WHAT IS A REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND

    WHY DO WE NEED ONE?

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED15

  • There are many ways to skin a cat , bake a cake and

    regulate color additives

    ▪ The source of a color additive, whether it is from plant, mineral,

    animal, or synthetic sources, has no bearing on its safety.

    ▪ European regulatory bodies use a precautionary approach, while the

    U.S. agencies tend to be more reactive.

    ▪ Labeling

    • FDA (US) - every color is listed by its common or scientific name

    • EFSA (EU) - colors are listed by name or E number

    • JECFA (CODEX) - depends

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED16

    https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/america-worst-food-quality-safety/

  • It’s not just a matter of semantics…even the spelling is

    incousiztent

    ▪ In the United States, a “color additive” is defined by in the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic act (FD&C Act) as:

    • a material which is a dye, pigment, or other suitable substance made by a process of synthesis or similar artifice, or extracted, isolated, or otherwise derived, with or without intermediate or final change of identity, from a vegetable, animal, or mineral, or other source, and when applied to a food, drug, or cosmetic or to the human body or any part thereof, is capable (alone or through reaction with another substance) of imparting a color thereto

    ▪ In the European Union, “coloring” is defined as:

    • “substances which add or restore colour in a food and include natural constituents of food stuffs and sources which are normally not consumed as foodstuffs as such and not normally used as characteristic ingredients of food.”

    ▪ In Japan, a “food additive” is defined as:

    • (i) substances used in or on food in the process of manufacturing food, or

    • (ii) substances used for the purpose of processing or preserving food.

    • Consequently, ''food additive'' includes both substances remaining in the final products, such as food colors and preservatives, and substances not remaining in the final products, such as microorganism control agents and filtration aids.

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED17

  • CODEX to the rescue…almost

    ▪ International Numbering System for Food Additives (INS)

    • Intended as a harmonised naming system for food additives as an alternative to the use of the specific names

    • E-number, name of the food additive, the functional classes and the technological purposes

    • E163 – anthocyanins, fruit and vegetable juice

    ▪ Functional Class #9. Colour (49 approved)

    • A food additive, which adds or restores colour in a food.

    • Colour, decorative pigment, surface colourant

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED18

  • The opportunity is to speak the same language and

    educate regulators, consumers, marketers and product

    developers to do the same

    ▪ Definitions

    ▪ Safe use

    ▪ Technical Benefits

    ▪ Sustainability

    ▪ CHOICE – it is up to you!

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED19

  • Opportunities for New Natural Red Colors:

    Stability Improvement and Applications

    Deepti Dabas, PhD

  • Agenda

    ▪ Natural vs Synthetic Colors

    ▪ Data and Trends

    ▪ Synthetic colors and Tinctorial Strength

    ▪ Red-orange Coloring Options

    ▪ Stability Improvement

    ▪ Case Studies

    • Betalains

    • Anthocyanins

    ▪ Applications Using Other Colorants

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED21

  • IMPORTANCE OF COLORS

    ▪ Color is the first attribute noticed

    ▪ Creates an expectation of flavor

    ▪ Can elevate the mood and create excitement

    ▪ Instagram/food pictures

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED22

    Berry/Rose/Hibiscus

  • DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NATURAL AND SYNTHETICS

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED23

    CHARACTERISTICS NATURAL COLORS SYNTHETIC COLORS

    LABEL & HEALTH

    NOTIONS

    Clean label; ‘considered’ health promoting ‘considered’ health diminishing

    FLAVOR IMPACT Can have aroma or taste of the source At typical usage rate, no off flavor

    TINCTORIAL STRENGTH;

    STRENGTH & PURITY

    Depends on individual pigments & properties; source

    variation, location, variety, cultivation practice,

    extraction method; generally lower than synthetics

    75-85% strength (dyes) is fairly common

    STABILITY Variable, can be improved with the use of stabilizers;

    easy to degrade when disposed

    Generally quite stable, may not degrade

    when disposed

    SUSTAINABILITY Sustainable especially with better breeding programs,

    better cultivation practices and better extraction

    methods

    Considered less sustainable, derived from

    coal tar based ingredients

    PERFORMANCE Some are water soluble whereas other oil soluble,

    need suitable emulsifiers and incorporation

    techniques

    Both dyes and lakes (their oil dispersible

    forms) are available for different matrices

  • APPROVED CERTIFIED COLORS IN USA FOR FOOD

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED24

    COLOR OTHER NAME RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY

    YEAR OF APPROVAL

    FOR FOODS

    Allura Red FD&C Red no 40 Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) 1971

    Sunset YellowFD&C Yellow no 6 GMP

    1986

    TartrazineFD&C Yellow no 5 GMP

    1969

    Brilliant BlueFD&C Blue no 1 GMP

    1993

    Fast GreenFD&C Green No 3 GMP

    1982

    Indigotine FD&C Blue no 2GMP

    1987

    Erythrosine FD&C Red no 3GMP

    1969

  • FOOD COLORS GLOBAL MARKETS 2018 VS 2023

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED25

    2156.7

    701.9

    1023.5

    2923.5

    904.6

    1293.8

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    Natural colors Nature Identical Synthetic

    US

    D M

    illio

    n

    2018-Est

    2023-Proj

    Source: Markets and Markets, 2018

  • CONSUMPTION OF SYNTHETIC DYES IN USA

    Dye Fiscal’ 2012 (lb.)

    Fiscal’2018 (lb.)

    Increase or decrease

    (%)

    Red No 40 6,405,570 5,616,397 87.6

    Blue No 1 671,108 927,527 138.2

    All 7 dyes 17,158,050 15,820,030 92.2

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED26

    Source: http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171115110637/https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ColorAdditives/ColorCertification/ColorCertificationReports/ucm286321.htm

  • GLOBAL USE OF RED 40 : NUMBER OF PRODUCT LAUNCHES

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED27

    1,6391,940

    2,1532,479

    3,232

    3,8134,016

    4,604

    5,148

    6,094

    5,630

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    7,000

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

    40,072 ProductsCAGR: +13.1%

    Source: Innova

  • USE OF NATURAL ALTERNATIVES : BEET, ANTHOCYANINS & PAPRIKA

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED28

    1,374

    1,967

    2,6152,875

    3,302

    4,355

    4,778

    5,199

    5,833 5,686

    6,208

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    7,000

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

    44,192 ProductsCAGR: +16.2%

    Source: Innova

  • OPTIONS FOR RED -ORANGE COLORANTS

    ▪ Anthocyanins – Pink-Red-Orange

    ▪ Red Beet – Pink-Red

    ▪ Paprika – Orange-Red

    ▪ Carmine/Carminic Acid – Pink-Red-Orange

    ▪ Annatto – Yellow-Red

    ▪ Lycopene – Orange-Red

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED29

  • COMPARISON OF TINCTORIAL STRENGTH

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED30

    𝐸𝑐𝑚1% =

    10 𝜀

    𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑤𝑡

    Absorbance of 1% of a pure pigment /Specific Absorbance

    Color E1%Wavelength

    (nm)

    Allura Red 522 504

    Paprika 2100 460

    Betanin 1120 535

    Anthocyanin/s 403 515-535

    Carminic acid 175 530

    Norbixin 2870 482

    Lycopene 3245 488

    𝜀 = molar absorptivity M-1 cm-1

  • STABILITY IMPROVEMENT

    Color Can stability be improved/needed If then How

    Anthocyanins No (Yes - Radish) Rosemary

    Paprika Yes Rosemary and others

    Beet Yes Organic Acids and others

    Carmine NA

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED31

  • CASE STUDY : ANTHOCYANINS, STABILITY &

    APPLICATIONS

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED32

  • © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED33

    ANTHOCYANINS

    Cyanidin-3-glucoside Pelargonidin-3-glucoside

  • © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED34

    PROCESSING AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE OF ANTHOCYANINS

    ▪ US Sec 73.169 Grape extract

    ▪ U.S. Sec 73.260 Vegetable juice/73.250 Fruit Juice

    Expressing juice of fresh edible vegetables by water infusion of dried vegetable

    Beet juice may be concentrated or dried

    May contain diluents that are safe and suitable

    ▪ EU: E163 AnthocyaninsExtraction with sulphited water, acidified water, carbon dioxide, methanol orethanol from the natural strains of vegetables and edible fruits.

    Cyanidin; Peonidin; Malvidin; Delphinidin; Petunidin and Pelargonidin

    liquid and powder forms

  • CASE STUDY : USING AND STABILIZING

    BETALAINS IN

    FOOD MATRICES

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED35

  • CARMINE AS A COLORANT

    ▪ Carminic acid : Cochineal Extract

    ▪ Dactylopius coccus

    ▪ Carmine : Calcium or calcium-aluminum lake formed from carminic acid

    ▪ Characteristics :

    ▪ Insoluble pigment (at low pH)

    ▪ Imparts red to pink shades to foods

    ▪ High stability

    ▪ Carmine Replacement : Starbucks

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED36

  • CARMINE PROVIDES GOOD PERFORMANCE BUT…

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED37

    ▪ Not Vegetarian/Vegan

    ▪ Not Kosher

    ▪ Not Halal

    ▪ Allergenicity

    ▪ Need to be declared on the label by name (in US)

    ▪ Cannot be used in some applications in Europe – e.g. Ice-cream

  • © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED38

    BEET FOR CARMINE REPLACEMENT IN SALAMIAfter mixing ( 2 min.)

    Control Red Beet

    After Overnight Curing

    Control Red Beet Cooked Sausage : Red Beet Powder

    Photos: Copyright Kalsec

  • © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED39

    PAPRIKA STABILITY IMPROVEMENT

    Control Treatment

    0 day

    28 days at

    45 oC 010

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Control Treatment

    % A

    bso

    rbac

    e at

    460

    nm

    % color retained at 28 days

    Photos: Copyright Kalsec

  • © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED40

    PAPRIKA IN OIL VS PLATED ON SALT

    Photos: Copyright Kalsec

  • CONCLUSIONS

    ▪ Trends clearly indicate that natural is the order of the day

    ▪ Different red colors are available for todays’ product developer

    ▪ A color’s hue is a function of its concentration and matrix

    ▪ The stability of select colors can be improved by adding suitable stabilizers or antioxidants

    ▪ Using appropriate color for the application to get required performance and stability is crucial

    © INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED41